Background: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the impact of oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers on periodontal status of adults special needs in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 180 caregivers and 180 adults with special needs divided into three equal groups (n = 60 + 60 + 60) based on type of disabilities: Visual impairment group (I); moderate mental retardation group (II); and physical impairment group (III). Questionnaire forms were used to assess the oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers. The clinical examination of special needs adults was done to assess the effect of oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers on periodontal status of adults special needs. All data were collected and analyzed by the SPSS statistical software and (ANOVA) to assess the variations in the mean and standard deviation (±SD) of clinical findings. Results: Acceptable periodontal, oral health knowledge, awareness and oral health practice were detected among caregivers, particularly, group (II) more than group (III) and group (I). But there were no significant differences in periodontal clinical parameter scores in the comparison between the study groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that the level of oral health practice and knowledge of caregivers included within the current study, were not effective in keeping periodontal health of special needs adults.
The health of the community is connected with the physical, mental and social health of an individual [
A disability is a lack of the normal ability and activity of the special needs individuals that compose a fundamental part of the community. It is predestined that there are about 500 million disabled in the world [
In Saudi Arabia, disability is a considerable economic and social problem. According to 2000 demographic survey, it was revealed that 135,000 Saudi people are disability individuals [
Recently, the increasing in the consciousness of this group special needs from the dental side due to their physical inability to have appropriate oral hygiene, moreover, difficulties in getting enough dental care in the dental office were noticed [
On the other hand, there is an increase in the incidence of dental diseases among special needs individuals in the Gulf Area. Therefore, the evaluation of caregivers behavior toward periodontal and oral health is necessary due to its impact on periodontal and oral health keeping among these kinds of individuals [
Furthermore, there was no study focused on the oral health practice and oral health knowledge level of caregivers and its effect on periodontal status among special needs adults in Aseer Region. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers on the periodontal status among special needs adults in Aseer Region Saudi Arabia. At the end of the current study, the results that were obtained may help caregivers to maintain the health of periodontal tissues, among these patients in special needs centers in Saudi Arabia.
The current cross-sectional study was carried out on 180 special needs patients and on 180 caregivers who visited the Outpatients’ Dental Clinics, College of Dentistry at King Khalid University in the period between January 2018 and January 2019. Special needs individuals were divided into three equal groups (n = 60 + 60 + 60), visual impairment group (I), moderate mental retardation group (II) and physical impairment group (III).
All participants in the current study (special needs individuals and caregivers) were males. The standard of the inclusion of the present study was their close working with the special needs individuals. It is difficult to assess the level of oral health practice and oral health knowledge of all special need individuals’ caregivers in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. And also to evaluate its impact on the periodontal status of special also need individuals. Consequently, the sample in the current study depended on a selection of participating individuals who came to the Outpatients’ Dental Clinics, college of dentistry, King Khalid University in Abha city of Aseer region. In such way that they represent the caregivers and their special need individuals in Aseer region possible.
The Scientific Research Committee, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University reviewed and approved the proposal of the study and the ethical clearance certificate was obtained (SRC/ETH/2018-19/081). The consent for participants was obtained before starting the study. All ethical steps of this study design were applied according to the Ethical Standards of the Helsinki Statement 1975 reviewed in 2008.
A questionnaire for the present study was designed for an interview of all the caregivers’ participants to assess the oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers. The questionnaire was prepared in different languages due to the fact that was foreigners. The questionnaire was comprised of caregivers’ personal, general and occupational information. Moreover, two portions of information. Part (I): Questions about the caregivers’ periodontal, oral health knowledge and awareness. Part II: Questions about the caregivers’ periodontal and oral health practice (
The clinical examination of the assessment periodontal tissues as well as the oral hygiene status among special needs individuals was conducted by the authors as a second clinical step in the present study. Periodontal and oral health status of all the special needs individuals in the present study was evaluated by the assessment of; Plaque Index (PLI) [
Data was collected and a comparison was done between the oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers and periodontal status of special needs adults. Data was analyzed by using the SPSS Statistical Software (version 21.0, IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Percentages of the results and proportions were applied to explain the statistics. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and utilized to assess the variations in the mean and standard deviation (±SD) of PLI, GI, PPD, GR and
CAL. Chi-square test was applied to evaluate the relation between periodontal and oral hygiene status of patients. According to the types of disabilities and caregiver oral health practice, knowledge level and the adopted statistical significance differences (p-value) in the results of this study were (p < 0.05).
On the other hand,
DAǂ | Groups | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Group I | Group II | Group III | ||
EA* | 17 (29%) | 20 (33%) | 19 (32%) | 56 (31%) |
MA | 23 (38%) | 22 (37%) | 27 (45%) | 72 (40%) |
LAᵠ | 20 (33%) | 18 (30%) | 14 (23%) | 52 (29%) |
Total | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 180 (100%) |
Chi-square | X2 | 5.204 | ||
P-value | 0.103 |
ǂDistributions of adults within group; *Early Adulthood (24 - 34 ys); **Moderate Adulthood; **(34 - 60 ys). ᵠLater Adulthood (60 - 75 ys).
Groups | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group I | Group II | Group III | ||||
Range of age | 25 - 35 ys | 12 (20%) | 17 (28%) | 11 (19%) | 40 (23%) | |
36 - 45 ys | 27 (45%) | 31 (52%) | 29 (48%) | 87 (48%) | ||
46 - 55 ys | 21 (35%) | 12 (20%) | 20 (33%) | 53 (29%) | ||
Total | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 180 (100%) | ||
Chi-square | X2 | 4.725 | ||||
P-value | 0.146 |
of group III were within the range of age 46 - 55 years. Consequently and according to these results, there were 31%, 40% and 29% of special needs individuals within early Adulthood age. The moderate adulthood age, and the later adulthood age respectively, whereas, 23%, 48% and 29% of caregivers within the age range of 25 - 35 years 36 - 45 years and 46 - 55 years respectively.
Caregivers were interviewed to evaluate their periodontal and oral health knowledge and awareness (
Tooth brushing should be two times daily according to the answers of 37% of group I, 32% of group II and 49% of group III compared to 48% of group I, 16% of group II and 16% of group III who reported that it should be after eating. Furthermore, the anti-sensitivity teeth dentifrices were the best toothpaste according to the answers of 69% of group I, 78% of group II and 70% of group III.
On the other hand, 55% of group I, 27% of group II and 52% of group III answered that the ideal brush is the soft toothbrushes compare with 37% group I, 57% of group II and 45% of group III who chose the answer of medium toothbrushes. In addition, 33%, 60% and 48% of caregivers demonstrated that the toothbrush should be changed every three months. Regarding the answers to oral hygiene measures in the questionnaire and when we asked caregivers about the right method of tooth brushing 38% of group I, 52% of group II and 55% of group III reported that the horizontal tooth brushing is the best method.
In the answers to the question about the methods of interdental spaces cleaning, 73% of group I, 77% of group II and 77% of group III answered that the using to dental floss is the effective method to clean the Interdental space. Regarding determine the suitable time of the dental clinic visit, there were 63% of group I, 72% of group II and 60% of group III answered that it should be every six months. Consequently, oral health practice among the caregivers of group II and group III was better than among the caregivers of group I.
P value | % | Frequency | Choose one answer | Questions | N | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0001* | GIII | GII | GI | GIII | GII | GI | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A-18 | How many teeth does adult individual have? | 1 | |
10 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | B-28 | |||
80 | 78 | 82 | 42 | 47 | 49 | C-32 | |||
10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 7 | 11 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 93 | 92 | 97 | 56 | 55 | 58 | A-Small black cavity on the tooth surface | Which of the following may help you to know the dental decay? | 2 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | B-Tooth bleeding | |||
7 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | C-Tooth pain | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 85 | 87 | 82 | 51 | 52 | 49 | A-Plaque | Do you know what the discoloration in the neck of the tooth is? | 3 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | B-Tartar | |||
7 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 6 | C-Food debris | |||
3 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A-Normal Gum | What do bleeding gums indicate? | 4 |
93 | 97 | 87 | 56 | 58 | 52 | B-Infected Gums | |||
5 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | C-Pigmented Gums | |||
2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A-Age progression | Which of the following is considered essential for causing gum diseases? | 5 |
27 | 20 | 25 | 16 | 12 | 15 | B-Sweet and sugar | |||
73 | 80 | 68 | 44 | 48 | 41 | C-Bacterial deposit | |||
0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 59 | 36 | 51 | 35 | 22 | 31 | A-Gums abscess | Which of the following may occur after gums diseases? | 6 |
33 | 55 | 35 | 20 | 33 | 21 | B-Missing teeth | |||
0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | C-Headache | |||
8 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 66 | 68 | 65 | 40 | 41 | 39 | A-Yes | Do you think, there is a correlation between systemic diseases and gum diseases? | 7 |
12 | 10 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 14 | B-No | |||
22 | 22 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 7 | C-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.00001* | 33 | 36 | 48 | 20 | 22 | 29 | A-Bleeding of gums | What is the most important problem related to the gums and teeth of your patient? | 8 |
47 | 42 | 33 | 28 | 25 | 20 | B-Dental decay | |||
10 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | C-Movement of teeth | |||
10 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 7 | D-I haven’t any idea | |||
0.0001* | 86 | 81 | 92 | 52 | 49 | 55 | A-Sweet | Which of the following food most deleterious to teeth and gums? | 9 |
7 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | B-Meat | |||
7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | C-Fruits | |||
0 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 5 | D-I haven’t any idea |
0.0001* | 7 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 5 | A-Mouth sensation | What are the effects of tobacco smoking on the gums? | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 14 | 10 | B-Inflammation of gums | |||
72 | 67 | 64 | 43 | 40 | 39 | C-Mouth cancer | |||
5 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 7 | D-I haven’t any idea |
% | Frequency | Choose one answer | questions | N | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIII | GII | GI | GIII | GII | GI | |||
72 | 68 | 55 | 43 | 41 | 33 | A-Tooth brushing | What is the ideal method for teeth cleaning at home? | 1 |
3 | 2 | 35 | 2 | 1 | 21 | B-Washing with water | ||
22 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 17 | 4 | C-Cleaning with Miswak | ||
3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
33 | 47 | 7 | 20 | 28 | 4 | A-One-time | How many times per day the teeth should be cleaned? | 2 |
49 | 32 | 37 | 29 | 19 | 22 | B-Two times | ||
16 | 16 | 48 | 10 | 10 | 29 | C-After eating | ||
2 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 5 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
70 | 78 | 69 | 42 | 47 | 41 | A-Anti-sensitivity dentifrices | What Kind of dentifrices do you prefer? | 3 |
8 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 8 | B-Teeth-whitening dentifrices | ||
8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | C-Herbal dentifrices | ||
14 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 8 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
52 | 27 | 55 | 31 | 16 | 33 | A-Soft | What is the ideal kind of toothbrush? | 4 |
45 | 57 | 37 | 27 | 34 | 22 | B-Medium | ||
0 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 5 | C-Hard | ||
3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
55 | 52 | 38 | 33 | 31 | 23 | A-Horizontal | Which of the following is the correct method of tooth brushing? | 5 |
26 | 26 | 23 | 16 | 16 | 14 | B-Circular | ||
12 | 20 | 27 | 7 | 12 | 16 | C- Horizontal with circular | ||
7 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
22 | 22 | 27 | 13 | 13 | 16 | A-After one month | When the toothbrush should be changed? | 6 |
28 | 16 | 38 | 17 | 10 | 23 | B-After 2 months | ||
48 | 60 | 33 | 29 | 36 | 20 | C-After 3 months | ||
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
77 | 77 | 73 | 46 | 46 | 44 | A-The dental floss | Which of the following should be used for cleaning the spaces between teeth? | 7 |
8 | 13 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 8 | B-The toothpick | ||
13 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 7 | C-Inter dental brush | ||
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | D-I haven’t any idea | ||
22 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 8 | A-Once every 3 months | What is the suitable time to visit the dental clinic routinely | 8 |
60 | 72 | 63 | 36 | 43 | 38 | B-Once every 6 months | ||
16 | 13 | 22 | 10 | 8 | 13 | C-Once every year | ||
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | D-I haven’t any idea |
PLIₓ | GIₓₓ | PPDⱷ | GRⱷⱷ | CALⱴ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group I | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.81 | 2.1 ± 0.33 | 6.6 ± 1.14 |
Group II | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.11 | 6.0 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 0.88 | 8.7 ± 2.38 |
Group III | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 1.6 | 5.5 ± 1.5 | 2.0 ± 0.25 | 7.5 ± 1.75 |
P-value | 0.613 | 0.355 | 0.314 | 0.677 | 0.424 |
ₓPlaque index; ₓₓGingival index; ⱷPeriodontal pocket depth; ⱷⱷGingival recession; ⱴClinical attachment loss.
II group III (p > 0.05). The mean and standard deviation of PLI and GI of group III were more than group I and II whereas PPD, GR and CAL in group II were more than group I and group III.
Patients in group I and group III had a fair oral hygiene and Stage III generalized periodontitis moderate rate, whereas, moderate oral hygiene and Stage III generalized periodontitis severe rate were detected among the patients in group II. These clinical findings are not corresponding to the oral health knowledge and practice among caregivers of group I, group II and III where there was an increase in the level of oral health knowledge and practice among caregivers of group II and group III more than group I.
The role of caregivers in the preservation of periodontal and oral health is very important. Consequently, regular oral health participates to the inhibition of periodontal disease, but there are difficulties for the individuals with special needs who cannot do regular oral health by themselves and depend on caregivers for help.
Special needs individuals were divided into two main groups: Congenital deficiencies group and acquired disorders group. The current study was designed to assess the effect of oral health practice and knowledge level of caregivers on periodontal status of some special needs adults in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. Several earlier studies revealed that there was sufficient knowledge of oral health among caregivers [
In Saudi Arabia and depending on the knowledge of authors, there are no former studies displayed the relationship between the periodontal status of special needs individuals and the oral health Knowledge of their caregivers in Aseer Region. The findings of the present study displayed differences in periodontal status among special needs individuals according to the oral health knowledge and oral health practice among caregivers. These results are in agreement with the results of another study which demonstrated that good oral health could be accomplished for special needs individuals after caregivers’ development of their oral health knowledge [
The findings of the present study revealed that the caregivers had a good knowledge about oral health (81.75%) more than their knowledge of periodontal health (67.5%), which is in agreement with the finding of another study which revealed that 75% of the caregivers reported that constant oral health is necessary to avoid the incidence of oral diseases [
In the present study 70.5% of caregivers in group I chose the correct answers of oral health and periodontal knowledge questions, compared to 74.7% of group II and 72.8% of group III. This shows that the caregivers of the special needs individuals in the current study had more awareness about the risk factors of oral and periodontal diseases.
In a previous study which has been done to evaluate the oral health knowledge of some caregivers, there were three from five of caregivers knew the effects of topical application of fluoride in preventing dental caries. Other previous studies confirmed the importance of caregiver’s comprehension regarding the effect of fluoride in the protection of oral health [
It is noteworthy that caregivers in this study demonstrated acceptable knowledge of periodontal and oral health practice, where 37% of caregivers in group I, 32% of caregivers in group II and 49% of caregivers in group III answered that teeth should be brushed twice daily. In contrast with 48% of caregivers in group I, 16% of caregivers in group II and 16% of caregivers in group III relieved that it is best to brush teeth after every meal. Moreover, 7% of caregivers in group I, 47% of caregivers in group II and 33% of caregivers in group III answered that teeth should be brushed one time daily. These results are in agreement with a professional recommendation which revealed that tooth brushing should be twice daily with bass technique [
On the other hand, the results aren’t in agreement with the findings of Niazi et al. [
Considering that the toothbrushes are vital tools in plaque controlling and keeping of periodontal health [
Regarding the method of tooth brushing, the plurality of caregivers in the present study used horizontal tooth brushing technique. These results coincided with the results of Padilla et al. studies [
It should be noted that to preserve the health of periodontal tissues in interdental areas, many researchers recommend using dental floss [
Based on the results of the current study, there were ineffectual of oral health Knowledge and oral health practices of caregivers to decrease the formation of dental plaque and periodontal disease among special needs individuals in Aseer region. In previous epidemiological study, there was a relation between the level of dental plaque and oral hygiene in addition to the severity of periodontal disease [
According to the clinical findings of the present study, the oral hygiene is better and severity of periodontal diseases is less among the special needs individuals in group I compared to the special needs individuals in group II and group III.
In the present study, the oral hygiene was fair and the severity of periodontal disease was stage III generalized periodontitis moderate rate among the special needs individuals in group I and group III. Compared to moderate oral hygiene and severe stage III generalized periodontitis severe rate among the special needs individuals in group II [
These results are not in harmony with the oral health knowledge and practice among caregivers of group I, group II and III, where there was an increase in the level of oral health knowledge and practice among caregivers of group II more than group I and group III. That may be due to the mental retardation among the patients of group II compared to the patients of group I and III.
The limitations in this study are that it was carried out on the special needs individuals who went through periodontal treatment in the outpatient Dental Clinics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University in Abha city as a sample of special needs individuals in Aseer region. It is known that there are several centers of special needs individuals in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, this study included males of caregivers and special needs individuals only.
Although the limitations in the present study conclude that all caregivers didn’t take practice in periodontal and oral care, and they educated periodontal oral health practice by other colleagues or by themselves. Periodontal and oral health knowledge of caregivers was satisfying, but the periodontal status was unsatisfying that most of the special needs adults in the current study affected by moderate to severe periodontitis. For improving oral health and periodontal status of special needs individuals, the dental education and oral hygiene practice should be given to caregivers.
The authors would like to thank the parents of the special needs individuals, their caregivers, and the dental assistants in the clinics of college of dentistry, King Khalid University, for their participation and help in completing this study.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Al-Abdaly, M.M.A.A., Almalki, R.A.A. and Shalan, A.M.A. (2019) The Impact of Oral Health Practice and Oral Health Knowledge Level of Caregivers on Periodontal Status of Some Special Needs Adults in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Stomatology, 9, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2019.95012