Using a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer and magnetic susceptibility meter, we measured fired bricks from nine temples (Prasat Thom, Prasat Damrei, Prasat Chamreh, Prasat Krachap, Prasat Kraham, Prasat Chen, Prasat Banteay Pir Chan, Prasat Chrap, and Prasat Pram) of the Koh Ker monuments, Cambodia. Based on cluster analysis of the chemical compositional data for Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, and Zr, as well as magnetic susceptibility data, the brick buildings could be classified into four groups (Stages A to D). Taking into consideration the five construction stages (Stages ① to ⑤) defined by Uchida et al. (2014) for laterite buildings, and using the assumption that all buildings were basically constructed outwards from the center, we define a construction sequence for these brick buildings. Thus, the following chronological relationship was obtained for construction stages of both laterite and brick buildings: Stage A → Stages B & ① → Stages C & ② → Stages D & ③ → Stage ④ → Stage ⑤. We surmise that the Northern Libraries of Prasat Pram, Prasat Chen and Prasat Damrei were added after the construction of their Inner Enclosures.
The Angkor monuments are representative of the monuments constructed by the Khmer people from the 9th to 15th century. The Angkor area was the capital of the Khmer Empire, situated north of Tonle Sap Lake. The Koh Ker monuments are located 85 km northeast of the Angkor monuments (
Investigation of the Koh Ker monuments began with Harmand (1879) , and was followed by Delaporte (1880) , Aymonier (1900) , Lunet de Lajonquière (1902) , Groslier (1924-1926) , Parmentier (1939) , Jacques & Lafond (2004) , Evans (2010-2011) , and Mizoguchi & Nakagawa (2011) . To date, no study except for Uchida et al. (2014) has focused on the construction sequence of the Koh Ker monuments.
Sandstone, laterite, and bricks were the major construction materials used in the Koh Ker monuments. Sandstone blocks were used to the Inner Enclosure, East and West Gopuras of the Middle Enclosure, and East Gopura of Prasat Thom, Prasat Balang, Prasat Thneng, Prasat G, Prasat Khna and other buildings. Sandstone blocks were supplied from the surrounding area (Evans, 2010-2011) . Because little difference in the chemical composition or magnetic susceptibility of these sandstone blocks was found, sandstone could not be used to determine the construction sequence of the Koh Ker monuments (Uchida et al., 2014) . In contrast, there are remarkable differences in the chemical composition and magnetic susceptibility of the laterite used in construction of many of its buildings.
Uchida et al. (2014) determined the construction sequence of the laterite buildings in the Koh Ker monuments based on Sr content and magnetic susceptibility of these laterite components. As a result, five construction stages were recognized among the laterite buildings. In this study, we focus on the bricks, another important construction material of the Koh Ker monuments, to deduce the construction sequence of the brick buildings. All bricks used in the Khmer monuments, including the Koh Ker monuments, are fired bricks. Bricks were used for the Sanctuaries of Prasat Thom, Prasat Damrei, Prasat Chamreh and Prasat Krachap, and the Libraries of many temples (
In this study, we conducted chemical analyses and magnetic susceptibility measurements of bricks used in the Koh Ker monuments. Measurements were carried out on brick buildings from the following nine temples: Prasat Thom, Prasat Damrei, Prasat Chamreh, Prasat Krachap, Prasat Kraham, Prasat Chen, Prasat Banteay Pir Chan, Prasat Chrap, and Prasat Pram (
Analyses of the bricks were conducted non-destructively, using a portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer (Delta Premium; Innov-X Systems Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). “Soil mode” was used for all measurements. Prior to analysis, calibration curves were obtained using Japanese standard rock samples: JA-1, JA-2, JB-1b, JB-2, JB-3, JG-1a, JG-2, JGb-1, JR-1, and JR-2 (Imai et al., 1995) . The total measurement time was fixed at 60 s. Field measurements were conducted on the surfaces of 10 bricks, not covered with soil, lichen or algae, from each building, and an average value was calculated.
Given that magnetic susceptibility of the sandstones used in the Angkor monuments was very useful in determining the construction sequence of the sandstone buildings and the provenance of the sandstone blocks (Uchida et al., 2003, 2007, 2013) , we applied this technique to bricks in this study. The magnetic susceptibility measurements were conducted non-destructively, using a portable magnetic susceptibility meter (SM30; ZH Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic). We measured brick surfaces of 5 cm × 5 cm. Contribution to measured magnetic susceptibility is around 50% at a depth of 5 mm from the surface, around 80% at a depth of 15 mm, and around 90% at a depth of 25 mm. The measurement time was about 2 s, giving an accuracy of 1 × 10−6 SI unit. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were made on 50 bricks at each building, and an average value was calculated. Measurements were carried out on flat surfaces of bricks, not covered with soil, lichen or algae.
The bricks in the Koh Ker monuments have a yellowish to reddish brown color on surface. This color may reflect the existence of hematite and/or goethite. The bricks in the Koh Ker monuments frequently contain a small amount of pisolites, up to 10 mm in diameter, in which iron and aluminum oxides are concentrated.
In addition to the chemical analyses and magnetic susceptibility measurements of the bricks, a cluster analysis (Ward’s method) was carried out using these data to obtain groupings of the brick buildings in the Koh Ker monuments.
Our XRF measurements detected the following common elements in bricks of the Koh Ker monuments: Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, Zr, Sr, Mn, Ca, V, Co, Cu, Zn, and Pb. Average compositions of selected elements are summarized in
Average magnetic susceptibilities of bricks of the Koh Ker monuments are summarized in
The 13 elements most commonly detected in bricks of the Koh Ker monuments were: Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, Zr, Sr, Mn, Ca, V, Co, Cu, Zn, and Pb. There were no significant differences in the contents of Co, Cu and Zn among buildings. However, Ca, Sr, Mn, Pb, and V showed large fluctuations within the same buildings. Therefore, our cluster analysis using Ward’s method, was restricted to the elements, Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, and Zr, as well as magnetic susceptibility (
The dendrogram obtained using chemical compositional data for Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, and Zr, as well as magnetic susceptibility data is shown in
Based on the chemical composition and magnetic susceptibility of laterite, Uchida et al. (2014) assigned the laterite buildings in the Koh Ker monuments to five construction stages. In particular, Uchida et al. (2014) used Sr content of the laterite to divide the laterite buildings into two groups, using a value between 300 to 400 ppm. Likewise, magnetic susceptibility of the laterite buildings was used to divide them into two groups, using a value of 2 × 10−3 SI units. Assuming that temples were basically constructed outwards from the center, as it is demonstrated in the Angkor monuments except for middle enclosures (Dumarçay & Groslier, 1973; Uchida et al., 2003) , laterite buildings in the Koh Ker monuments were classified into five construction stages (Stages ① to ⑤) (
All laterite buildings in Prasat Thom belong to relatively old stages (Stages ① and ②) of construction of the Koh Ker monuments (
East Gopura (Prasat Kraham) (Stage B) of the Outer Enclosure was constructed almost at the same time as the laterite Outer Enclosure, belonging to Stage ①, giving an initial construction sequence of Stage A → Stage B & Stage ①. The construction sequence of Stage B & Stage ① is also deduced from Pr. Damrei (
The relationship between Stage C and Stage ② is clearly evident in Prasat Krachap (
The relationship between Stage D and Stage ③ was deduced from buildings in Prasat Banteay Pir Chan (
From the above facts, the chronological relationship among Stages ① to ⑤ for the laterite buildings and Stages A to D for the brick buildings is determined to be: Stage A → Stages B & ① → Stages C & ② → Stages D & ③ → Stage ④ → Stage ⑤ (
Chemical analyses using a portable XRF analyzer and magnetic susceptibility measurements were conducted on bricks of nine temples in the Koh Ker monuments. Cluster analysis using magnetic susceptibility data and chemical compositional data for Ti, Fe, Rb, Y, and Zr, grouped these brick buildings into four distinct groups, corresponding to Stages A to D. All buildings classified as Stage A are situated in Prasat Thom. Brick buildings of Prasat Damrei and Prasat Chen, and Prasat Kraham in Prasat Thom are classified as Stage B, while those of Prasat Chen and Prasat Kraham are classified as Stage C. Stage D includes the brick buildings of Prasat Banteay Pir Chan and Prasat Pram, and the Northern Libraries of Prasat Chen, Prasat Chrap and Prasat Damrei. Bricks used for each Stage have distinct chemical compositions: Stage A bricks are rich in Y (more than 33 ppm); Stage B bricks are rich in Rb (more than 39 ppm); Stage C bricks are rich in Zr (more than 540 ppm); Stage D bricks are depleted in Rb (less than 36 ppm).
Taking into consideration Stages ① to ⑤ determined for the laterite buildings described in Uchida et al. (2014) , a construction sequence for the brick buildings was determined based on chemical composition and magnetic susceptibility of their bricks, as well as the assumption that temples were constructed outwards from their center. We obtained a consistent construction sequence, except for the Central Sanctuary of Prasat Chen. The chronological relationship between Stages ① to ⑤ for the laterite buildings and Stages A to D for the brick buildings of the Koh Ker monuments is defined as follows: Stage A → Stages B & ① → Stages C & ② → Stages D & ③ → Stage ④ → Stage ⑤. The Northern Libraries of Prasat Pram, Prasat Chen and Prasat Damrei were likely added after the construction of the Inner Enclosure.
This research was carried out as part of the Japanese Government Team for Safeguarding Angkor, with permission from the Authority for the Protection and Management of Angkor and the Region of Siem Reap (APSARA Authority, Cambodia). It was supported financially by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Project No. 23401001; E. Uchida).
Uchida, E., & Sakurai, Y. (2018). Construction Sequence of the Koh Ker Monuments Constrained by the Chemical Composition and Magnetic Susceptibility of Its Bricks. Archaeological Discovery, 6, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2018.62009