Small-scale crop production in many parts of Tanzania is constrained by many problems among which soil fertility degradation is a major problem. Over 80% of cassava ( Manihot esculenta ) production in Tanzania is done by the small-scale farmers who continuously cultivate their fields, but use limited inputs to restore depleted plant nutrients. The objective of this study was to examine the best legume species that could be incorporated in cassava ( Manihot esculenta ) production systems under farmers’ conditions and result in increase in soil fertility and crop yields. Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis were either incorporated with cassava (Manihot esculenta) or planted as sole crop in rotation with cassava. Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis were found to produce almost similar amount of biomass. The two legumes, however, produced higher biomass in rotation than intercropping system. The amount of biomass produced by Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis in rotation system was 6.28 t·ha-1 and 5.31 t·ha-1, respectively. The Mucuna use represents an input of nitrogen into the soil which simulates a saving cost of 181.42 and 141.96 US$ ha-1. In the first year, cassava root yields were significantly increased (p < 0.05) over control (continuous sole cassava) (1.44 t·ha-1) by the use of intercropping of cassava (Manihot esculenta) with Mucuna pruriens (2.41 t·ha-1) and or Canavalia ensiformis (2.25 t·ha-1). Intercropping and rotation of cassava with legumes increase cassava yield and represent a sustainable alternative to reduce the farms’ dependence on external inputs and to enhance inherent soil fertility.
Low soil fertility is widely recognized as a major obstacle to improving agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa [
The low and declining productivity of many tropical soils are the major constraints limiting the realization of improved genetic potential of crops that is now available [
One alternative to restore soil fertility is the use of high-soluble fertilizers; however, the ratio of the price of inorganic fertilizers is unfavorable to most of the smallholder farmers because of the high price. These situations create food insecurity and low income to resource poor farmers. Other alternative is to intercrop or rotate crops with legumes as a low-cost approach to adding nitrogen in the soil [
In Southern Africa, increased yield of subsequent cereal crops after leguminous plants has been demonstrated [
The relationship between Soil Organic Matter (SOM) and productivity is ascribed to the role of SOM in supplying plant nutrients, enhancing water holding capacity, improving soil aggregation and hence water holding capacity, improving soil pH, supporting soil biological activity, consequently giving higher crop yield compared to treatments from which the crop residue had been removed [
In some villages of western Tanzania, most farmers use neither fertilizers nor farm yard manure [
Although many studies emphasize the use of legumes, little has been reported in Tanzania on the use of Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis for improving soil fertility of small scale farmers. This paper aimed to evaluate the influence of Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis to improve soil fertility and cassava root yield in Western Tanzania.
Kigoma region is located on shores of Lake Tanganyika at the North-West corner of Tanzania. The region is situated between longitude 29.5 and 31.5 East and latitude 3.5 and 6.5 South of the equator. The region is characterized by a unimodal rainfall regime with annual total rainfall between 500 - 1500 mm. The region is divided into four agroeconomical zones, namely the lake shore zone, the miombo forest zone, the intermediate zone and the highlands zones [
The experiment was carried out in Kasulu district in Kigoma Region in areas low in N and P. The study involved Fifty (50) farmers in the district. The farmers were randomly selected at the region. Rainfall and potential evapotranpiration were measured by sattelite imagens gathered data of two years (2015 and 2016) in the experimental fields region [
Before initiation of the trials, composite soil samples were collected from each farmer’s field for initial fertility determination using soil auger at 0 - 15, 15 - 30 cm depth from 4 randomly selected spots within the plots. The samples were analysed for pH, organic carbon, available phosphorus and exchangeable cations (Na, K, Ca and Mg) and total nitrogen (
Organic carbon was determined using the Walkey and Black wet oxidation method using concentrated sulphuric acid and aqueous potassium dichromate [
The trial design was randomized complete randomized block (RCBD) with individual farmer field plots as replicates. Plot size was 10 × 10 m and the net plot 8 × 8 m separated by 1m distance, in which 10 rows of cassava were planted at a spacing of 1 × 1 m, within and between rows spacing respectively.
Properties | Soil depth (cm) | Medium value |
---|---|---|
Organic C (g∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 3.21 |
Total N (g∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 0.29 |
Available P (mg∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 6.09 |
Exchangeable Ca (cmol∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 4.05 |
Exchangeable Mg (cmol∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 1.25 |
Exchangeable K (cmol∙kg−1) | 0 to 15 | 0.15 |
pH (in water 1:2.5) | 0 to 15 | 6.30 |
15 to 30 | 5.88 | |
Bulk density (g∙cm−3) | 0 to 15 | 1.151 |
15 to 30 | 11.358 | |
Sand (%) | 0 to 15 | 57.8 |
Silt (%) | 14.2 | |
Clay (%) | 38.5 |
Treatments were as followed: 1) Cassava without legumes (Control); 2) Cassava with recommended mineral-fertilizer applied at the time of planting (50 kg N ha−1) applied to cassava in both seasons; 3) Mucuna pruriens sole crop (rotation system); 4) Cassava intercropped with Mucuna pruriens planted two weeks after planting cassava; 5) Canavalia ensiformis sole crop (rotation system); 6) Cassava intercropped with Canavalia ensiformis planted two weeks after planting cassava. The used cassava variety from IITA was Mkombozi with 125 days to maturity. Sole cassava was grown in the first season 2015 and 2016 in order to test the residual value of Mucuna pruriens and Canavalia ensiformis.
Phosphorus was applied to all treatments at a rate of 45 kg P2O5 ha−1 to one season. Legumes-Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis intercropped in between cassava row 30 cm apart, while Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis sole crop-75 cm between rows, 0.3 m within rows. At harvesting, all cassava in the eight middle rows was harvested. From the middle eight rows, root of the cassava plants were harvested and weighted. Subsamples were taken to laboratory to oven dry to 65˚C for estimation of harvested dry weight.
Cover plants samples were ground to 0.5 mm and digested according to [
Mean cassava yield data of two years (2015 and 2016) were used in the partial budget analysis [
TVC = a + b + c + d (1)
where:
TVC: Total variable cost (US$ ha−1);
a: cassava cuttings (US$ ha−1);
b: legume seeds (US$ ha−1);
c: fertilizes (US$ ha−1);
d: labour(US$ ha−1).
Net benefit was calculated by subtracting total variable cost from gross benefit.
NB = GB − TVC (2)
where:
NB: net benefit (US$ ha−1);
GB: gross benefit (US$ ha−1);
TVC: total variable cost (US$ ha−1).
The marginal rate of return (MRR) was calculated as the ratio of differences between net benefits to successive treatments to the difference between total variable costs of successive treatments.
MRR = RL CT v
where:
MRR: marginal rate of return;
NB: net benefit;
TVC: Total variable cost.
Data from the trials were organized and analysed using the GENSTAT statistical programme. Significant differences at p < 0.05 are indicated by DMRT. Production costs for economic analysis were analysed through partial budget analysis.
Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis were found to produce almost similar amount of biomass. The two legumes, however, produced higher biomass in rotation than intercropping system (
Cropping systems | Biomass (t∙ha−1) | Nitrogen content (%) | Nitrogen (kg∙ha−1) | Cost saving (US$ ha−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mucuna cassava rotation | 6.28 | 2.60 | 163.28 | 181.42 |
Cassava Mucuna intercropping | 5.05 | 2.53 | 127.77 | 141.96 |
Canavalia cassava rotation | 5.31 | 2.40 | 127.44 | 141.60 |
Cassava Canavalia intercropping | 3.82 | 2.34 | 89.39 | 99.32 |
Effect of rotation and intercropping of cassava with Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis on cassava yield. Legume incorporation and N fertilizer significantly affected cassava yield in the two seasons 2015 and 2016 seasons (
In general, on average they increased cassava yield over the control treatment by 118% and 56% under rotation and intercropping systems respectively. Jarvis et.al, 2012, reported that cassava yield was more than doubled by incorporation of three month old Mucuna and Crotalaria grown in alluvial soil on the island of Java, Indonesia. These results showed that the two legumes did not differ significantly on their effects on cassava yield under the different cropping systems, meaning that the two legumes have almost equal potential as source of nitrogen for soil fertility replenishment. The higher effect of the legumes on cassava yield observed under rotation over intercropping system could be due to a higher biomass produced and incorporated into the soil.
Comparison of the mineral fertilizer treatment (50 kg N ha−1) with two legumes under the two cropping systems showed that mineral nitrogen fertilizer was not statically different from the two legumes under the two cropping systems. However, the mean cassava yield of the mineral fertilizer was slightly lower but higher than the mean cassava yield under rotation and intercropping systems, respectively. The inferior effect of the mineral nitrogen fertilizer over the green manure under rotation system could probably be attributed to excessive leaching effect as a result of high rainfall during the second season. Increase in cassava yield with the incorporation of forage legumes had been reported by several researchers [
In the present study we have shown that nitrogen content of the two legumes was high (Mucuna 2.60% and Canavalia 2.40%) and there was no much difference in nitrogen content of the biomass harvested from the two different cropping systems (
Treatment | Cassava yield (t∙ha−1) | Yield increase (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | ||
Control | 1.44c | 2.00c | 0 |
Cassava + 50 kg N ha−1 | 2.76ab | 2.83b | 88 |
Mucuna rotation | 3.14a | 3.79a | 118 |
Cassava Mucuna intercropping | 2.41b | 2.80b | 62 |
Canavalia rotation | 3.03ab | 3.28ab | 120 |
Cassava Canavalia intercropping | 2.25b | 2.39b | 56 |
Mean | 2.51 | 2.85 | |
CV (%) | 3.8 | 8.4 |
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT (P > 0.05).
Cropping systems | Nitrogen | Phosphorus | Potassium | Calcium | Magnesium | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | |
Mucuna pruriens | 102.4a | 63.2a | 18.6ab | 13.2ab | 115.0ab | 68.2a | 22.2a | 13.0bc | 9.7ab | 9.7ab |
Canavalia | 57.8b | 45.6b | 14.7bc | 11.9ab | 86.1bc | 50.0bc | 14.4bc | 11.0c | 8.1bc | 8.1bc |
Control (no fertilizers) | 40.4c | 29.0c | 6.5c | 4.8b | 40.7c | 37.0c | 6.4c | 5.6c | 5.2c | 6.0c |
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT (P > 0.05).
that they can be used as source of nitrogen for soil fertility replenishment [
The total N uptake of cassava was quite different between treatments. More was taken up in Mucuna pruriens followed by Canavalia ensiformis than after control in both years (
Economic analysis (
Comparison of the mineral nitrogen treatment with the two legumes as a source of nitrogen indicated that a higher net benefit was obtained from use of
Cropping systems | TVC2 | NB3 | MRR4 |
---|---|---|---|
US$ ha−1 | US$ ha−1 | ||
Control | 38.83 | 69.35 | 1.79 |
Mucuna-Cassava rotation | 29.69 | 64.59 | 2.18 |
Cassava-Mucuna intercropping | 30.84 | 107.31 | 3.48 |
Canavalia-rotation | 29.69 | 65.33 | 2.20 |
Cassava-Canavalia ensiformis intercropping | 30.84 | 109.50 | 3.55 |
1. = Price of cassava crop, cassava cuttings, and legume seeds = 3.65 $, 45.68 and 45.68 $∙kg−1, respectively.
the two legumes than mineral fertilizer. Reasons for the lower net benefit recorded from the mineral N treatment versus the legumes could be attributed to high price ratio of mineral fertilizers to price ratio of cassava crop. Price of mineral fertilizers has being going-up over the years whereas that cassava remained constant or even went down.
However, farmer’s evaluation of the treatments showed that Mucuna was chosen as first priority for soil fertility and cassava yield improvement. However, its habit of coiling on cassava, made Mucuna suitable in rotation system. Canavalia ensiformis was chosen as best-bet because it can be used both in rotation as well as in intercropping system as it does not coil on cassava. Mucuna was considered to be equally useful as Canavalia ensiformis in terms of cassava yield improvement, however, its habit of coiling on cassava and strangle it, made to be suitable only in rotation systems. But acceptability of the farmers to use the two legumes for soil fertility improvement under rotation system was low because the legumes do not have other economic benefit(s) other than soil fertility improvement.
Use of nitrogen fertilizers in the study area is important for improving cassava yields. Farmers who can afford to apply mineral nitrogen fertilizers (50 kg∙ha−1) or above can expect cassava yield improvement of about 88% than farmers who do not use mineral fertilizer. However, farmers that can use Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis legumes as source of nitrogen with cassava can get higher cassava about 118% than those farmers who do not use Nitrogen fertilizers. Also, farmers who could intercrop cassava with either of the two legumes can expect cassava yields of about 56% than those farmers who do not use mineral nitrogen fertilizers.
Based on economic analysis, higher net benefit was obtained from intercropping than rotation system either of the two legumes. Rotation system had lower net benefits because of cassava crop that was forgone during the first season, thus making net return for this treatment low.
It was concluded that both Mucuna and Canavalia ensiformis legumes have high potential as organic nitrogen source for soil fertility restoration, and hence cassava yield improvement.
More studies are needed in future to study on; amount of nitrogen contributes to the soil by the two legumes through biological fixation and effect of the two legumes as cover crop for soil moisture conservation and weed suppression.
We would like to express our sincere thanks first to the Market Place Initiative for financial support for the two years of implementation of the project. Also we would like to extend our sincere thanks to the Director, ARI-Tumbi for assistance and material support during the implementation of the project, also wish to thank Daldo Kasulu and his staff, particularly Mr. Mathias and Odilo for data recording in the farmers’ field.
Matata, P.Z., Passos, A.M.A., Masolwa, L.W., Marcolan, A.L. and Ribeiro, R. da S. (2017) Incorporation of Leguminous Cover Crops in Smallholder Cassava-Based Production System in Western Tanzania. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 3490-3501. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.813235