Vietnam has become increasingly integrated into the global economy since its accession to the WTO in 2007, which is not only beneficial, but also detrimental. Membership was almost immediately followed by the 2008 global financial crisis which, along with Europe’s escalating public debt, dramatically slowed Vietnam’s, at that time, rapidly developing economy. To mitigate the persisting effects of that economic shock and facilitate growth sufficient to the needs of its citizens, Vietnam is obligated to reevaluate the sustainability of its “brown economy” and develop strategies toward the adoption of a “green economy” growth model. Vietnam is fortunately located in a region that has been experiencing dramatic economic development and with its neighboring countries, many advantageous social and legal conditions for the development of a green economy. Yet, Vietnam’s economy persists in being driven by a brown growth model which is characterized by reliance on raw materials production, the consumption of unsustainable quantities of fossil fuels and natural resources and burgeoning environmental pollution. This paper provides a nation-level analysis of green technology development in Vietnam by using the data from the National Office of Intellectual Property to analyze the extent to which green technology constitutes technology use in Vietnam. Vietnamese enterprises were interviewed to gain insight and data regarding the development and renovation of green technology. Given this situation, an assumption is made that initial growth in greening the economy is primarily driven by enterprises. Greening economy can start from technology renovation and it was hypothesized that such renovation would have been due to both knowledge-based labor and outside support. It was also hypothesized that green economy can be pushed under the outside pressure on Vietnamese enterprises. This paper was designed to test these hypotheses.
Green economic development has been a global trend for sustainable growth in developing countries. Vietnam is no exception. The “Agenda 21” action plan on sustainable development identified that the country’s official task was to change its growth model and restructure the economy towards sustainable development. Vietnam is in the most dynamic economic region in the world and has favorable conditions for greening the economy. However, it is also admitted that a green economy has not developed in Vietnam. Vietnam’s economy persists in being driven by a brown growth model which is characterized by reliance on raw materials production, the consumption of unsustainable quantities of fossil fuels and natural resources and burgeoning environmental pollution. In fact, the dominant forces in the economy are unsustainable energy-intensive highly polluting raw materials processing industries, the antithesis of green technology.
A large body of academic research studies green economic concepts from various perspectives, the needs and the requirements for green economic development in both developed and developing countries and the common view is that the green economy is one in which the contribution of enterprises plays a dominant role. Many empirical studies in the literature to date examine the strategies adopted by a variety of businesses, which have helped to fuel green development in economic sectors such as energy, technology, agriculture, etc. and in many countries, including Vietnam.
Vietnam’s economy is in the process of developing and opening up to world markets. Clearly, new strategies are required. Given the importance of the greening transition in the process, there have been a lot of studies focusing on the policy framework for the green economy development in Vietnam [
The topic of the green economy has been debated since the 1970s, and especially since October 2008 when UNEP together with the developed economies implemented the idea of the green economy. It is possible to broadly categorize research reports about the green economy into two groups. The first group specializes in basic concepts, principles and views of green economic development such as Holger Rogall (2011), Nachhaltige Ökonomie-Ökonomische Theorie und Praxis einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung; Earthsummit 2012, Principles for the green economy: a collection of principles for the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication; OECD (2011) Towards green growth: A summary for policy makers, Paris; UNEP (2011), Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, Nairobi; UN (2012), Working towards a balanced and inclusive green economy: A United Nations System-wide perspective [
The second group analyzes specific situations and development strategies in some countries and regions such as UNESCO (2011), from green economies to green societies, Paris; UNEP (2010), Green economy-Develop- ing countries success stories, Nairobi; Stern. N. (2007), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations, TEEB; Robins, N. et al. (2010), Green austerity hits the UK, London: HSBC Global Research, Climate Change [
Researches in Vietnam [
Investment in clean technology, clean production can come from state and/or from enterprises. 97.5 % of enterprises in Vietnam are small and medium sized [
Many studies have proved that financial factors like cash flow, research workers’ salaries, etc. much influence on the R&D expenditures, which is key to renovation [
Hypothesis 1: Renovation motivation in Vietnamese enterprises is positively associated with non-financial factors including knowledge-based labor force and outside support.
There has been a strong trend of thought running through some studies which consider scientific personnel among dominant motivations for companies to focus on R&D [
Hypothesis 2: Green renovation in Vietnamese enterprises is positively associated with outside pressure.
Luo & Bhattacharya [
The research is tested in the context of Vietnam, an economy which is in the transitional period from brown into green.
Green technologies are primarily used in only six areas: construction, transportation, agriculture, industry, energy and waste treatment. 41% of the green technologies used in waste treatment are for filtration, clean water supply, and waste collection from production, medical facilities and residential use. Most of the green patents in energy are devoted to the production of electricity using solar and wind energy. R&D activities in construction, transportation and agriculture are not fully invested despite their important role in the process of greening the economy.
With 31 million motorbikes and more than 1.6 million automobiles in Vietnam, transportation is by far the greatest polluter of the environment. Only 4% of the green patents were granted in the transportation industry, and those were specifically for intelligent transportation systems, infrastructure quality and new more fuel efficient engines.
Among green technologies, some patents have been granted. Patents granted for green technologies were compared with ordinary technologies in
Green patents account for 2.18% of total patents granted annually, which is said to be extremely inadequate (see
Green patents in Vietnam are held by 6 groups of patent holders: multi-national organizations (including enterprises, investment funds, NGO), local enterprises, universities, research institutes, Vietnamese and foreigners (see
It has been noted that green patent exploitation depends on research, development and patent licensing activities from multi-national organizations. Such organizations when implementing technology transfer to Vietnam, assign or license a few green patents only, accounting for 1.8% of the total [
est and most productive universities and research institutes contributing to from 40% to 50% of national research [
We used data obtained from the survey conducted in 2014 in which we interviewed 450 enterprises in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang and Quang Ninh. Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City are the two biggest centers of economy, education and technology in the North and the South of the country so we assume that enterprises there shall be leaders in green technology renovation. Da Nang and Quang Ninh are situated in the centre and northern centre of Vietnam and are considered to be dynamic in technological areas. Questionnaires were prepared and sent to the said enterprises by postmails and emails.
The number of enterprises in interview was 26.4% in Ho Chi Minh City, 62.9% in Hanoi and 10.6% in Quang Ninh and 10.6% in Da Nang. 75.3% of enterprises interviewed situate in urban area; 20.7% of enterprises interviewed are in industrial zone; 2.7% are in hi-tech parks and only 1.3% are in processing zone.
To ensure the accuracy of the information collected, we arranged interviews with management boards or heads of R&D departments of 20 outstanding enterprises in the fields (see the Appendix for the list of these entrepreneurs).
We arranged meetings with legal scholars and economists in the Central Institute of Economic Management to exchange information and private assessments regarding the restructuring of Vietnam’s economy from brown to green.
Besides, the paper used data obtained from the National Office of Intellectual Property to have an overview of green technologies in Vietnam and work out the number of green patents out of the total granted in Vietnam up to 2013 in order to quantize the process of greening the economy in Vietnam.
First, bivariate relationships among variables were explored via correlation analysis. Then, multiple regression analyses were performed to test proposed hypotheses. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to support the analyses.
Renovation motivation in Vietnamese enterprises is positively associated with knowledge-based labor (
We use logistic model to valuate factors affecting on the enterprises’ decision of technology renovation toward clean and green.
Knowledge-based labor was thought to be important for the enterprises to push the process. We assume:
Labor: ld
No skill labor: ld_noskill
No train labor: ld_notrain
Basic skill labor : ld_socap
Intermediate skill labor: ld_trungcap
Vocational labor : ld_cd
Graduate labor: ld_dh
As can be seen in the below formula:
Variable of labor (ld) is in the below formula:
Regression of logistic model is used to evaluate the influence of knowledge-based labor on renovation.
As can be seen from the regression, the variable of labor does not have significant impact on the renovation in an enterprise. Same result has shown when lde is replaced by ld_dh, ld_cd.
Motivation | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
1 | Better quality | 87.26 |
2 | Lower price | 58.28 |
3 | Adaptability | 44.59 |
4 | Lower labor cost | 26.43 |
5 | Waste treatment | 17.20 |
6 | Reduction of energy expenditure | 16.26% |
7 | Others | 11.78% |
Regression of function (2) provides Xi value 1 provided support from outsiders and 0 with no such support. Outsiders can be authorities, research institutions, business partners, etc.
Regression results from
Logistic regression of other determinants is also done as below:
Environmental cost : Q 17
Environment relating certificates: Q 22 & 11
Outside support from business partners: Q 16 & 3
SA certificate 8000: Q 22 & 13
Export out of revenue: Q 25
Logistic regression | Number of obs = 432 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR chi2(8) = 15.13 | ||||||
Prob > chi2 = 0.0567 | ||||||
Log likelihood = −245.74589 | ||||||
Pseudo R2 = 0.0299 | ||||||
Li | Odds Ratio | Std. Err. | z | P > |z| | [95% Conf. Interval] | |
X3 | 1.859729 | 0.4679075 | 2.47 | 0.014 | 1.135762 | 3.0451723 |
X1 | 1.209564 | 0.4095352 | 0.38 | 0.702 | 0.5694337 | 2.309132 |
X2 | 0.95293 | 0.4403835 | 0.52 | 0.601 | 0.5925427 | 2.469097 |
X4 | .6243408 | 0.2109306 | −1.39 | 0.163 | 0.3219937 | 1.210587 |
X5 | 1.612622 | 0.5578401 | 1.38 | 0.167 | 0.8186229 | 3.176737 |
X6 | 1.101025 | 0.4507991 | 0.24 | 0.814 | 0.4934971 | 2.456459 |
X7 | 1.085757 | 0.3537507 | 0.25 | 0.801 | 0.5733273 | 2.056188 |
X8 | 0.9856942 | 0.2931192 | −0.05 | 0.961 | 0.5503228 | 1.765497 |
Source of support | Support/total enterprises | Support/enterprises having support |
---|---|---|
Local authorities | 21.53 | 31.31 |
Research management authorities | 20.37 | 29.63 |
Business partners | 47.92 | 69.70 |
Non-governmental organizations | 18.06 | 26.26 |
Research institutes | 18.52 | 26.94 |
Investment funds | 10.19 | 14.81 |
Technology conselling organizations | 29.63 | 43.10 |
Associations | 31.02 | 45.12 |
Others | 13.6 | 19.87 |
The survey includes a question on the determinants of the green development for enterprises with the Likert scale from zero-no importance to 5-extremely importance. The result can be seen in the
Customers in 91 enterprises in our survey have required environment relating certificates but only 39 enterprises can meet such demand.
56% of the enterprises admitted that green development has been urgent need for them to improve their competitiveness (the Likert scale is 4 out of 5). The outside pressure for green development on the enterprises has been seen increasing. Around 10.2% of the enterprises in the sample have certificates relating to green development like certificates of environment, etc meanwhile 30.56% enterprises have faced with the requirement of such certificates from their customers and 29.4% enterprises have been asked to show such certificates in order to access foreign markets. Those numbers have shown that Vietnamese enterprises have lost many opportunities to access new markets, new customers.
Logistic regression | Number of obs = 266 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR chi2(6) = 30.80 | ||||||
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 | ||||||
Pseudo R2 = 0.0985 | ||||||
Log likelihood = -140.90484 | ||||||
Odds Ratio | Std. Err. | z | P > |z| | [95% Conf. Interval] | ||
Q 11 | 1.871914 | 0.560703 | 2.09 | 0.036 | 1.040691 | 3.367055 |
Q 25 | 0.9850502 | 0.0056331 | −2.63 | 0.008 | 0.9740712 | 0.9961528 |
Q 17 | 0.95293 | 0.0215055 | −2.14 | 0.033 | 0.9116986 | 0.996026 |
Q 22 & 11 | 2.443402 | 0.8058512 | 2.71 | 0.007 | 1.280155 | 4.663663 |
Q 22 & 12 | 4.019569 | 4.818084 | 1.16 | 0.246 | 0.3836021 | 42.11899 |
Q 22 & 13 | 0.0797545 | 0.0958384 | −2.10 | 0.035 | 0.0075665 | 0.8406524 |
Mean | Deviation | |
---|---|---|
Cost reduction in long term | 2.650943 | 1.907591 |
Customer requirement | 3.132075 | 1.656591 |
Authorities requirement | 3.283019 | 1.865755 |
Strategic development for enterprises | 2.990566 | 1.748443 |
Better labor condition | 2.943396 | 1.728364 |
This study explores the relationships among renovation motivation in Vietnamese enterprises, knowledge-based labor and outside support. Inconsistent with the existing literature where knowledge-based labor was found to be dominant motivation for companies’ renovation, the study shows that such labor force does not have significant impact on the renovation in an enterprise in Vietnam.
It is proven here that there is a strong linkage between renovation and outside supports (authorities, business partners, research institutes). Also, customers’ requirements and authorities’ regulations are two outstanding determinants to push the renovation toward greening process. Therefore, it is recommended for the government to develop these links and to erase obstacles which weaken such links. The obstacles can be unavailable subsidies for clean electricity, discouraging investment in wind and solar energy [
It is found in this study that pressure from existing environment-relating certificates is positively associated with renovation motivation in Vietnamese enterprises. The government should take advantage of such pressure to encourage enterprises to invest resources in the development of green patents and/or to the exploitation thereof in the shortest time as implemented in Japan and the United States [
This study has two main limitations. First, it relies on cross-sectional survey; therefore, causal relationships among variables cannot be confirmed. Second, measures of determinants are still based on subjective assessment of managers in the enterprises. Future research could address these weaknesses by including objective measures of determinants and conducting longitudinal studies.
Despite all the limitations, results of this study still advance our knowledge of the relation between the green economy development and enterprises’ involvement. The study has provided some important implications for enterprises’ managers and for policy makers.
This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number II4.5-2012.02.
HoThuy Ngoc,NguyenTu Anh, (2016) Green Economy Development in Vietnam and the Involvement of Enterprises. Low Carbon Economy,07,36-46. doi: 10.4236/lce.2016.71004
List of 20 outstanding companies whose managers interviewed: