We study a sample of the companies listed on the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) for the predictors of the returns on these companies’ stocks. Using the sample period of December 2004 through July 2011, we study the sample of 134 companies out of a universe of 176 companies. We construct the marketwide indicators of Fama-French approach: capitalization (Small and Big) and book-to-market ratio (Low, Middle and High). The standard CAPM and three-factor regression equations are estimated. The typical Fama and French results are not obtained. At best, the results are mixed. They show that Nepalese capital market provides excess return for big value-stocks and lower excess return for small growth-stocks. It is possible that this result is attributable to the biases in the listed corporate sector. Financial sector companies dominate the listing on the Nepal Stock Exchange. Because of the impossibility of elimination financial companies from the sample, it is impossible to be categorical about this attribution. We recommend that the study be replicated after a few years when either more companies become available or longer time series of data becomes available.
The Fama and French (FF) three-factor model has emerged as an alternative explanation for the ongoing debate on asset pricing. It was developed by Fama and French [
However, most of the research concentrated on the U.S. and developed capital markets may not be applicable to less-developed and emerging capital markets. To the best of our knowledge, no study has been carried out in the context of Nepalese stock market and very few of South Asian markets. The current study attempts to fill the gap by using data from Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE). This paper empirically examines the Fama-French three-factor model for the Nepalese stock market. We test the one-factor pricing relationship implied by the CAPM and the three-factor linear pricing model of Fama and French. We analyze whether the market, size and value factors provide enough explanatory power for the cross-section of stock returns.
The remainder of the present study proceeds as follows. Section 2 outlines the Fama-French three-factor model and some related anomalies research. Section 3 details the empirical method employed and describes the various sources of data. Section 4 presents and discusses test results and section 5 offers a summary and conclusion.
The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) remains perhaps the popular choice among practitioners when it comes to calculating both expected return on stocks and benchmark expected return. The attraction of the CAPM is that it offers powerful yet simple predictions about risk and the relation between expected return and risk. The model’s expected return is the sum of the return on the risk-free asset plus an expected premium for risk, where the risk premium is a function of the asset’s covariance (beta) with the market. Despite the simplicity, it performs poorly in explaining realized returns. That is, if by creating portfolios at a given point in time with a range of betas, it is not clear that a perfect or near-perfect linear positive relationship between portfolio beta and realized returns actually exists. The beta calculated using a broad-based market index on average explains about 70 percent of the volatility of stock returns.
Similarly, there is now a substantial published literature that documents a return premium to small companies [
Other researchers found value effect that returns are predicted by ratios of market value to accounting measures such as earnings, book-value of equity (Basu [
To explain these anomalies, Fama and French [
While there have been a few attempts to explain the size effect from a behavioral perspective, behavioral finance has played a central role in explanations for the book-to-market effect. The most common behavioral finance explanation is that the market overreacts to both good and bad company performance. Good performance is rewarded too handsomely by the market and prices are driven above the intrinsic value of the underlying stock. Bad performance is punished too harshly by the market and prices are driven below the intrinsic value of the stock [
Fama and French [
The study by Daniel, Titman and Wei [
The size and book-to-market effects observed by Fama and French in the US market have been observed also in markets outside of the US (Fama and French [
While the Fama and French [
A study of Fama and French three-factor model for the stock exchange of Thailand by Homsud, Wasunsakul, Phuangnark and Joongpong [
A similarly study of the stock returns of Athens Stock Exchange by Theriou, Aggelidis, Maditinos and Šević [
Connor and Sehgal [
Griffin [
As the preceding review illustrates, most of the research carried out in the developed capital markets and the extant published developed literature on the validity of the Fama and French multifactor asset pricing model is inconsistent with some of the key U.S. results. The current paper aims to improve our knowledge of the applicability of the Fama and French three-factor model in the Nepalese capital market and to contribute to the necessary accumulation of non-U.S. research.
For the purposes of this study, we need monthly return of each stock, weighted average monthly rate of risk-free return, monthly market return, market capitalization and book-value of each stock included in the sample. The total population of stocks is all the listed companies at the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) at the end of FY 2009-2010 which is 176. Monthly return is calculated by using the month-end price of each stock and retrieved from the monthly report of NEPSE from December 2004 to July 2011. So, from the 80 monthly reported data, 79 months’ returns are calculated. The NEPSE index is used to calculate market return for the same period. We use the standard measures for return and three factors. The equation to calculate return for individual stocks is
where
The accounting data from the balance sheet and profit and loss account of each company in the sample are used for book-equity. As fiscal year ends at mid-July each year in Nepal, we use the data up to July of FY 2010-2011. The monthly risk-free rate of return is retrieved from the rate of 91-days treasury bills which are published in monthly National Debt Bulletin of Nepal Rastra Bank, the central bank of Nepal.
From a universe of 176 companies, only 134 companies remain in the sample. A few companies are deleted because relevant accounting data are not available whereas some others were not included because relevant trading data are not available. The companies with negative book value are also not included. A noted departure occurs in the sample: We include both financial and non-financial companies for analysis. Contrastingly, Fama and French [
The classification of 134 companies in six portfolios is indicated in
The variable SMB (Small minus Big) represents the risk factor for size. SMB will be different for each month for the average returns of small group (SL, SM and SH) and the average returns of large group (BL, BM and BH).
The variable HML (High minus Low) represents the risk factor for equity value. HML will be different for each month for the average returns of high group (SH and BH) and the average returns of low group (SL and BL).
The sample of 134 companies is categorized by market capitalization and book-to-market value ratios. Small companies (indicated as S) are those which have market capitalization value less than the median market capitalization value of all companies and big companies (indicated as B) are those which have market capitalization value greater than the median value of all companies. Low book-to-market companies (indicated as L) are called growth companies and have book-to-market value ratio in the bottom 30 percent. The middle book-to-market companies (indicated as M) are called “neutral” companies and have book-to-market value ratio in the middle 40 percent. High book-to-market companies (indicated as H) are called value companies and have book-to- market value ratio in the top 30 percent. Thus, the intersection of the two sizes and three book-to-market groups produces six portfolios of stocks. The number of companies for each portfolio is presented in
The summary statistics shown in
SMB is constructed to measure the additional return investors have historically received by investing in stocks of companies with relatively small market capitalization. This additional return is often referred to as the “size premium”. A positive SMB in a month indicates that small-cap stocks outperformed large-cap stocks in that month. A negative SMB in a given month indicates the large-cap stocks outperformed small-cap stocks. As a point of reference, the historical annualized average premium from January 2005 to July 2011 of the monthly SMB factor is 0.16% as shown in
HML is constructed to measure the “value premium” provided to investors for investing in companies with high book-to-market values (essentially, the value placed on the company by accountants as a ratio relative to
Low (L) | Mid (M) | High (H) | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Small (S) | 8 | 37 | 23 | 68 |
Big (B) | 22 | 37 | 7 | 66 |
Total | 30 | 74 | 30 | 134 |
The total population of listed companies on the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) at the end of 2009-2010 is 176. Removing the companies without relevant accounting data or trading data left a sample of 134 companies. Note that this sample includes both financial and non-financial companies, because financial companies dominate the listing on the exchange. The companies are first ranked by market capitalization (size) and assigned to two different groups, Small and Big. Then, with each group, companies are ranked by book-to-market ratio and assigned to three groups, viz., lowest 30 percent (L), middle 40 percent (M) and highest 30 percent (H). These groups are then used to calculate the returns for Small minus Big (SMB) and High minus Low (HML).
Portfolio | Average Return | Median | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|
SL | 0.724% | 0.334% | 3.415% |
SM | 0.218% | 0.250% | 4.642% |
SH | −0.070% | −0.119% | 4.571% |
BL | 0.652% | 0.871% | 5.313% |
BM | 0.167% | 0.211% | 6.373% |
BH | 0.013% | −0.548% | 7.216% |
Market | 0.493% | 0.782% | 8.383% |
Risk-Free | 0.381% | 0.322% | 0.183% |
The table gives the distributional properties of returns of the six portfolios, designated by capitalization and book-to-market ratio. S = Small capitalization, B = Big capitalization. L = Low book-to-market ratio, M = Middle book-to-market ratio, H = High book-to-market ratio. For comparison, similar distributional properties are provided for the market index and risk-free rate. The data reflect the sample period from December 2004 to July 2011. From monthly returns of 80 months, 79 returns are calculated.
the value the public markets placed on the company, commonly expressed as B/M). A positive HML in a month indicates that value stocks outperformed growth stocks in that month. A negative HML in a given month indicates the growth stocks outperformed value stocks in that month. Over the time period from January 2005 to July 2011 annualized average of the monthly such premium for value stocks is −8.60%. It shows that on average, growth stocks (low book-to-market ratio) are providing higher premium in Nepalese capital market.
The correlation matrix of the calculated portfolios shows that monthly risk-free rate of returns has negative correlation with other variables. All the portfolios’ monthly returns as well as monthly market returns are positively correlated. Moreover, almost all correlation coefficient are significant at 5 percent level. The relationship of SL with BL, BM and Rm is not significant. Similarly, the correlation coefficient between Rf and Rm is also not significant at 5 percent level. The highest positive correlation is between SH and BM with coefficient 0.725 and the highest negative correlation is between SH and RF with coefficient −0.535 (
Following the tradition, we provide two sets of results. Because the three-factor model is an extension of the standard CAPM, CAPM serves as a nice benchmark.
The regression model for CAPM is as follows:
where the notation is standard. For each of the six portfolios, 79 excess monthly returns are regressed on excess market returns. Contrary to the previous studies, the results for our sample show that market risk tends to be higher for big companies in comparison with small companies. But this result is consistent with Halliwell, Heaney and Sawicki [
HML | SMB | |
---|---|---|
1.35% | −8.60% | 0.16% |
This table provides a measure of the incremental return received on stocks of companies in the category of High-minus-Low book-to-value ratio and Small-minus-Big capitalization. For comparison, the incremental return on the market index is provided. The data reflect the sample period from December 2004 to July 2011. From monthly returns of 80 months, 79 returns are calculated.
SL | SM | SH | BL | BM | BH | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL | 1 | |||||||
SM | 0.272 | 1 | ||||||
SH | 0.299 | 0.669 | 1 | |||||
BL | 0.060* | 0.634 | 0.583 | 1 | ||||
BM | 0.236 | 0.601 | 0.725 | 0.802 | 1 | |||
BH | 0.294 | 0.634 | 0.538 | 0.562 | 0.597 | 1 | ||
−0.009* | −0.407 | −0.535 | −0.329 | −0.411 | −0.327 | 1 | ||
0.002* | 0.403 | 0.270 | 0.680 | 0.566 | 0.510 | −0.169* | 1 |
The table provides correlations among the monthly returns of the six portfolios described in
Portfolio | α | β | R2 | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
SL | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.924 |
SM | −0.002 | 0.232 | 0.364 | 0.000 |
SH | −0.005 | 0.159 | 0.200 | 0.000 |
BL | 0.002 | 0.435 | 0.708 | 0.000 |
BM | −0.003 | 0.440 | 0.576 | 0.000 |
BH | −0.004 | 0.448 | 0.505 | 0.000 |
The table provides the results of the regression of the standard CAPM equation given by
Fama and French hypothesize that the return of big-size portfolio is less than small-size portfolio, implying that small minus big (SMB) coefficient should be positive. However, our sample shows that out of 79 months the big-size portfolio return is higher than the small-size return for 41 months. Further, 47 months’ portfolio returns on high-minus-low book-to-market portfolio are negative whereas the remaining 32 months’ returns are positive.
The regression model for the three-factor model is as follows:
where the notation is standard.
The alpha term is the intercept and it shows the excess return the portfolio earned. In other words, if the alpha is positive, the asset earned a return greater than it should have given its level of risk; if the alpha is negative, the asset earned a return lower than it should have given its level of risk. Here the estimates of alpha values for all portfolios are positive but none of them is significant.
The size- and value-factors as surrogates for non-market-specific risk should have positive returns. Therefore, value stocks should have higher returns than growth stocks; small stocks should have higher returns than large stocks; and small value stocks should have the highest returns of all.
The regression results presented in
In case of premium for value stocks, the regression results show that there is a significant positive relationship between SM, SH, BM and BH portfolio returns with HML factor. In addition, these estimates are significant. This means that HML factor possess some explanatory power for providing excess return to small value stocks. The portfolios of BH and SH have highest coefficients of HML (1.222 and 0.728) implying that value stocks are providing higher return in Nepalese capital market. This result supports one of the findings of Fama and French as well as other studies (e.g., Malin and Veeraraghavan [
Portfolio | Coefficients | p-value of Coefficients | Model | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α | β | h | s | pα | pβ | ph | ps | R2 | p-value | |
SL | 0.0037 | 0.1008 | 0.0630 | 0.3263 | 0.340 | 0.109 | 0.567 | 0.026 | 0.065 | 0.167 |
SM | 0.0020 | 0.2562 | 0.5553 | 0.2272 | 0.653 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.177 | 0.337 | 0.000 |
SH | 0.0005 | 0.1424 | 0.7280 | 0.1438 | 0.902 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.370 | 0.382 | 0.000 |
BL | 0.0018 | 0.1968 | −0.1134 | −0.8036 | 0.642 | 0.002 | 0.301 | 0.000 | 0.628 | 0.000 |
BM | −0.0005 | 0.1472 | 0.2379 | −0.8781 | 0.927 | 0.084 | 0.112 | 0.000 | 0.521 | 0.000 |
BH | 0.0050 | 0.1553 | 1.2217 | −0.6210 | 0.208 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.788 | 0.000 |
The table provides the results of the regression of the standard CAPM equation given by
that small capitalized and high book-to-market-value stocks generate high returns as compensation for higher systematic risk is partially true in Nepalese capital market.
We study the efficacy of the Fama-French three-factor model to explain realized returns in the Nepalese capital market, represented by the Nepal Stock Exchange. Both the traditional CAPM and the three-factor models are estimated on a sample of Nepalese companies. The results are mixed. The results show that Nepalese capital market provides excess return for big value-stocks and lower excess return for small growth-stocks. The typical Fama and French results are not obtained. It is possible that this result is attributable to the listed corporate sector. Financial sector companies dominate on the Nepal Stock Exchange. It is impossible to eliminate financial companies from the sample.
Given the above, it would be useful to replicate the study after a few years when either more companies become available or longer time series of data becomes available.
Sabin BikramPanta,NiranjanPhuyal,RajeshSharma,GautamVora, (2016) The Cross-Section of Stock Returns: An Application of Fama-French Approach to Nepal. Modern Economy,07,223-231. doi: 10.4236/me.2016.72024