This study aimed to elucidate elderly patients’ recognition of and life adjustment to attending dialysis facilities, and then to discuss factors for enabling such patients to continue attending dialysis facilities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants and interview data were analyzed using the modified grounded theory approach. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Niigata University School of Medicine. The interview data yielded 21 concepts, comprising 2 categories and 7 subcategories. Patients who find themselves in a “Difficult Lifestyle” often try to maintain their health and lifestyle by using required support for hemodialysis patients. Factors for continuing to attend dialysis facilities were the ability to cope with the Difficult Lifestyle and to adjust to Hemodialysis as a Life Priority. It is thought that switching from a model of economic security to one of providing living support will be effective for maintaining elderly dialysis patients’ life with only limited expenses. Additionally, it is necessary to consider the utilization of existing services.
Hemodialysis is the main treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Japan, where it accounts for 96.9% of chronic dialysis patients. In Japan, the mean age of dialysis patients has increased from 62.2 years in 2002 to 66.9 years in 2012 [
Hemodialysis patients have to attend a dialysis facility three times a week, and hemodialysis greatly affects the lives of elderly patients. The burden of kidney disease in Japan, as measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, is higher than in the US or Europe [
A qualitative descriptive design was used to collect data through semi-structured interviews.
A total of 15 hemodialysis patients were selected by the head nurse of the hemodialysis unit of cooperating facilities. Hemodialysis complications often occur in patients who receive hemodialysis for more than 10 years. In addition, patients who are over 65 years old often experience decreases in their activities of daily living. Therefore, the eligibility criteria in this study were 1) receiving hemodialysis for more than 10 years and 2) over 65 years old.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Japanese at the participants’ dialysis facilities by the first author, using a guide containing open-ended questions. Participants were asked to speak freely about their past experiences. Questions concerned patients’ experiences feeling difficulty in attending dialysis facilities, utilization of services for attending dialysis facility, worry about continuing to attend dialysis facilities, and recognition of attending dialysis facilities. Data were collected in August to September of 2012. All interviews were audio recorded, and later transcribed verbatim in Japanese, and ideas and observations that arose during interviews were recorded.
The modified grounded theory approach (M-GTA) [
The verbatimtranscript was reread repeatedly for in-depth analysis of data. In M-GTA, the minimum analytical unit is the concept, and each concept is derived from several pieces of data (variations). Here, variations were extracted from the verbatimtranscript according to the analysis theme “What kinds of life management do elderly hemodialysis patients perform in order to continue to attend dialysis facilities?” Variations were collected after reading the verbatim transcriptrepeatedly until fully comprehending them. Variations with similar meanings were grouped to allow for the development of concepts. The M-GTA uses an analyzing worksheet to develop concepts, which also includes ideas for concept names and notes on interpreting variations. When a concept was created, similar or antithetical data related to the concept were examined to prevent arbitrary interpretation. Subcategories were created from the relationships between concepts, relationships between subcategories were examined, and the process of data comparison and analysis was repeated. The structure of the relationships between subcategories was clarified, identifying the categories. Data collection and data analysis were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached, as assessed by the absence of new concepts.
The research was supervised by one researcher specialized in chronic illness nursing and all results were considered by all authors to ensure accuracy and reliability. All categories, concepts, and variations were originally in Japanese and analyzed as such. The author translated these data into English, and a native English translator verified the translations.
The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Niigata University School of Medicine (Approval No. 1443). Our study conformed to the principles set by the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained both verbally and in writing. All participants were informed that their participation was voluntary and that they could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. The participants’ physical condition was considered the first priority during the interview. The interview was suspended and rescheduled if so required by the participant required.
A summary of the 15 participants (9 men, 6 women; 7 participants in their 60 s, 7 in their 70 s, 1 in her 80 s; duration of dialysis 12 - 28 years) is shown in
Hemodialysis patients had been conscious of the first category of “Hemodialysis as a Life Priority” from initiation of dialysis to the present. Hemodialysis as a Life Priority consisted of the subcategories mental attitude of hemodialysis priority and life adjustment to hemodialysis priority. Mental attitude of hemodialysis priority consisted of 4 concepts: living with goals, thinking of hemodialysis as a part of life, thinking about needing hemodialysis in order to live, and being determined to receive hemodialysis. Hemodialysis as a Life Priority was positively influenced by feelings of support. Dialysis patients who experience living with poor physical condition
Participant | Gender | Age | Period of dialysis (years) | Primary disease | Job | Family | Access to dialysis facility | Family members in attendance | Commuting time, one way (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | M | 70 s | 12 | Nephrosclerosis | Unemployed | Wife | Private car | None | 15 |
B | M | 60 s | 19 | Glomerulonephritis | Independent business | Wife, Son | Private car | None | 15 |
C | M | 70 s | 12 | Glomerulonephritis | Independent business | Wife, Son | Private car | None | 20 |
D | M | 60 s | 19 | Nephrosclerosis | Temporary worker | Wife | Private car | None | 40 |
E | M | 70 s | 26 | Chronic nephritis | Unemployed | Alone | Private car | None | 10 |
F | M | 60 s | 17 | Glomerulonephritis | Temporary worker | Wife, Daughter | Private car | Wife | 10 |
G | M | 60 s | 15 | Pyelonephritis | Unemployed | Wife, Mother-in-law | Private car | None | 25 |
H | F | 60 s | 28 | Glomerulonephritis | Unemployed | Alone | Private car | None | 1 |
I | F | 70 s | 18 | Pyelonephritis | Unemployed | Husband | Private car | Husband, Son | 10 |
J | M | 60 s | 28 | Chronic nephritis | Unemployed | Alone | Private car | None | 15 |
K | M | 70 s | 18 | IgA nephropathy | Unemployed | Wife | Private car | None | 30 |
L | F | 70 s | 25 | Purpura nephritis | Agriculture | Husband, Son, Daughter-in-law, Grandchild | Private car | Husband, Wife | 10 |
M | F | 70 s | 25 | IgA nephropathy | Unemployed | Son, Daughter- in-law, Grandchild | Bus, Taxi | None | 10 |
N | F | 60 s | 19 | Pyelonephritis | Unemployed | Husband | Bus, Taxi | None | 20 |
O | F | 80 s | 16 | Glomerulonephritis | Unemployed | Husband | Bus | None | 15 |
“Category”, sub-category, concept |
---|
“Hemodialysis as a Life Priority” |
Mental attitude of hemodialysis priority |
Living with goals |
Thinking of hemodialysis as a part of life |
Thinking about needing hemodialysis in order to live |
Being determined to receive hemodialysis |
Life adjustment to hemodialysis priority |
Not wanting to burden family |
Scheduling around hemodialysis cycle |
“Difficult Lifestyle” |
Living with poor physical condition |
Realizing a decline in health |
Keeping a poor physical condition after hemodialysis |
Forcing oneself to attend dialysis facilities |
Difficulties of living with hemodialysis |
Feeling time constraints |
Feeling the inconvenience of transportation to dialysis facilities |
Feeling inferior because of receiving social security for dialysis patients |
Prospective worry about continuing to receive dialysis |
Envisioning a decline in health |
Worrying about future difficulty in attending dialysis facilities |
Required support for hemodialysis patients |
Requiring adaptable support for attending dialysis facilities |
Not wanting to change hemodialysis cycle |
Requiring financial support and car parking |
Wanting to be able to freely contact sources of advice |
Feelings of support |
Feel be helped by security services for dialysis patients |
Thought of being supported by medical professionals |
Feeling grateful for the support of family |
and difficulties of living with hemodialysis then begin to experience prospective worry about continuing to receive hemodialysis.
Elderly hemodialysis patients who realize this second category, Difficult Lifestyle, try to continue by taking advantage of the required support for hemodialysis patients, defined as requests for preferential treatment in attending dialysis facility. Required support for hemodialysis patients also consisted of 4 concepts: requiring adaptable support for attending dialysis facilities, not wanting to change hemodialysis cycle, requiring financial support and car parking, and wanting to be able to freely contact sources of advice. This addresses Difficult Lifestyle in accordance with patients’ situations. Required support for hemodialysis patients was increased by patients’ recognition of Difficult Lifestyle, and was decreased by recognition of Hemodialysis as a Life Priority.
The lifestyle adjustments clarified in this study were largely divided into those where patients attempted to solve their problems themselves (“Hemodialysis as a Life Priority”) and those where they would ask others for help (required support for hemodialysis patients). Hemodialysis as a Life Priority was disturbed by Difficult Life-
style. Because elderly hemodialysis patients could not avoid this Difficult Lifestyle, they tried to cope with it by strengthening their required support for hemodialysis patients. We consider that required support for hemodialysis patients played an important role in patients’ continuing to attend dialysis facilities. Required support for hemodialysis patients differs from secondary gains [
Social security and welfare systems are available for dialysis patients in Japan. Although the individual medical expenses for dialysis total from 10,000 to 20,000 yen (US$ 94.5 - 190.0, 1 US$ = ¥105.848; OECD 2014) [
Because there were participants from a limited residential area, it is possible that the study may reflect common local factors. Future studies should include more participants taken from a wider area.
Semi-structured interviews with 15 participants were conducted, and interview data yielded 21 concepts, divided into 2 categories and 7 subcategories. Elderly hemodialysis patients are conscious of Hemodialysis as a Life Priority. Patients who find themselves in a Difficult Lifestyle often try to maintain their health and lifestyle by using required support for hemodialysis patients. Factors for continuing to attend dialysis facilities were the ability to cope with the Difficult Lifestyle and to adjust to Hemodialysis as a Life Priority. It is thought that switching from a model of economic security to one of providing living support will be effective for maintaining elderly dialysis patients’ life with only limited expenses. Additionally, it is necessary to consider the utilization of existing services.
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
UtakoShimizu,MomoeSakagami,MiekoUchiyama,HagikoAoki, (2015) Life Adjustments of Elderly Hemodialysis Patients for Continuing to Attend Dialysis Facility. Open Journal of Nursing,05,878-884. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2015.510092