^{1}

^{2}

A complex example of electrolytic redox system involving 47 species, 3 electron-active elements and five (3 am-phiprotic + 2 aprotic) co-solvents, is presented. Mixed solvates of the species thus formed are admitted in the system considered. It is proved that the Generalized Electron Balance (GEB) in its simplest form obtained according to the Approach II to GEB is identical with the one obtained for aqueous media and binary-solvent system, and is equivalent to the Approach I to GEB.

Motto: “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler” [

In the previous issues [_{2}O) media, _{Wi}, n_{Ai} and n_{Bi}, considered as mean numbers of W, A and B attached to

In this paper, we refer also to more complex media with the mixture of co-solvents: W, A, B, E and F. We assume that the co-solvents are mutually miscible and at least one of the co-solvents has amphiprotic properties

[_{i} entities of these species in the related

system. In further part of the paper, we assume W = H_{2}O, A = CH_{3}OH, B = C_{2}H_{5}OH, E = (CH_{3})_{2}SO, F = CH_{3}CN;

W, A, B have amphiprotic properties, and E, F―have not. In particular, N_{15} ions _{15}

atoms of I, _{15}n_{15E} atoms of S, and N_{15}n_{15F} atoms of N. It is as-

sumed that the solvents do not form―with solvates―the species _{3}OH, _{3}O^{?} contain the cluster CH_{3}O^{?}, considered as the core. We denote C(A) = CH_{3}O^{?}, C(B) = C_{2}H_{5}O^{?}, C(E) = (CH_{3})_{2}SO = E, C(F) = CH_{5}CN = F. The species: H_{2}CO_{3}, _{2}) and ClO_{2} (chlorine dioxide) have different cores.

All the balances in this paper will be presented explicitly, to check the validity of the reasoning and accept it without reservations.

Let us consider a system obtained after addition of V mL of titrant (T) containing I_{2} (C) + KI (C_{1}) + CO_{2} (C_{2}) in A + B + E + F into V_{0} mL of titrand (D) containing KBrO_{3} (C_{0}) + HCl (C_{01}) + CO_{2} (C_{02}) in W + A + E; all concentrations are expressed in mol/L. The volume V_{0} mL of D is composed of N_{01} molecules of KBrO_{3}, N_{02} molecules of HCl, N_{03} molecules of CO_{2}, N_{04} molecules of W, N_{05} molecules of A, and N_{06} molecules of E; V mL of T is composed of N_{07} molecules of I_{2}, N_{08} molecules of KI, N_{09} molecules of CO_{2} and N_{011} molecules of A, N_{012} molecules of B, N_{013} molecules of E, and N_{014} molecules of F.

We assume that the solutes composing D and T were introduced in single solvents or mixtures of solvents. In ca. V_{0} + V mL of a D + T mixture thus obtained, we have the following species (all changes in oxidation degrees are admitted).

where I_{2(s)}―solid iodine, I_{2}―soluble iodine. In the above list of species, H_{2}O (N_{1}), CH_{3}OH (N_{44}), C_{2}H_{5}OH (N_{47}), (CH_{3})_{2}SO (N_{51}) and CH_{3}CN (N_{52}) are free molecules of the corresponding solvents, i.e., not involved in the solvates. We prove that the numbers: N_{1}, N_{44}, N_{47}, N_{51} and N_{52} of the free molecules and the numbers: n_{iW}, n_{iA}, n_{iB}, n_{iE}, n_{iF} of these molecules in the solvates do not enter the simplest form of the resulting GEB.

The elemental balances: f(H) for H, and f(O) for O are as follows:

・ f(H)

・ f(O)

From (1) and (2) we obtain

・ 2・f(O) ? f(H)

As we see, Equation (3) does not involve the terms N_{1}, N_{04}, and {n_{iW}} related to water. To cancel the terms involved with A, B, E and F, we add Equation (3) to the core balances (4) - (7): 2・f(CH_{3}O) (4), 4・f(C_{2}H_{5}O) (5), 4・f((CH_{3})_{2}SO) (6), 3・f(CH_{3}CN) (7) and charge balance (8). Further simplification gives addition of the balance for K (9), and of the core balance 4・f(CO_{3}) (10):

・ 2・f(CH_{3}O)

・ 4・f(C_{2}H_{5}O)

・ 4・f((CH_{3})_{2}SO)

・ 3・f(CH_{3}CN)

・ Charge balance

・ f(K)

・ 4・f(CO_{3})

As the result of this addition, considered as a kind of linear combination [

Applying the relations:

(where N_{A}―Avogadro’s constant), from Equations (11), (12) we have

Elemental balances for electro-active elements (“players”) are as follows:

f(Br)

f(Cl)

f(I)

Multiplying (14) - (16) by atomic numbers: Z_{Br} = 35, Z_{Cl} = 17, Z_{I} = 53, for Br, Cl and I, respectively, adding them and applying Equation (12), we have:

After subtracting (13) from (17), we get the equation for GEB, identical with one obtained according to Approach I to GEB

The balance (18) is equivalent to the balance (13).

A remark is needed in relation to the charge balance. Rewriting Equation (8) in terms of concentrations (see Equation (12)), we have

As we see, Equation (19) involves the ionic species related to amphiprotic co-solvents. However, in accordance with the remarks presented in [_{3}O^{?}) and (_{2}H_{5}O^{?}) can be perceived as pairs of solvates of H^{+} and OH^{−} ions.

The complex redox system in a mixture with five solvents is considered. The discussion can be extended on mixtures with S solvents,

systems, the solvates

Equation (13) was obtained from linear combination of the related balance 2・f(O) ? f(H) (Equation (3)) with: charge balance (Equation (8)), elemental balances for other “fans” (C, K) (Equations (9), (10)), and core balances (Equations (4) - (7)) related to organic solvents in this system. This GEB does not involve the species composed only of “fans”: H, O, C, K. In particular, it does not contain the components explicitly related to the solvent species. The paper is an illustration of the compact formulation of redox systems according to GATES/ GEB Principles, presented in Ref. [

One can notice that uncharged (neutral) species: I_{2}, I_{2}_{(s}_{)}, Cl_{2}, Br_{2}, ICl, IBr are not present in Equation (13). Note also that Cl^{−}, Br^{−}, I^{−}, Cl_{2}, Br_{2}, I_{2}, I_{2(s)}, _{2}Cl^{−}, ICl, _{3} (I―“player”; H, O― “fans”).

Note that―at the start―the Approach II does not distinguish between “fans” and “players”; the terms “fans” and “players” are used here only for the needs of the Approach I to GEB. In further parts of this text, the “players” (the electro-active elements) are distinguished later only to indicate the equivalency of the Approaches I and II.