^{1}

^{2}

^{2}

^{1}

^{*}

In this paper, we first summarize several applications of the flux approximation method on hyperbolic conservation systems. Then, we introduce two hyperbolic conservation systems (2.1) and (2.2) of Temple’s type, and prove that the global weak solutions of each system could be obtained by the limit of the linear combination of two systems.

It is well known that no classical solution exists for the following initial value problem

with bounded measurable initial data

where is the unknown vector function standing for the density of physical quantities and is a given vector function denoting the conservative term. These equations are commonly called conservation laws.

Since, in general, the discontinuity or the shock waves will appear in the solution to the Cauchy problem (1.1)- (1.2), there are two standard methods to obtain a weak solution or a generalized solution for given hyperbolic conservation laws. One is to construct a sequence of smooth functions to approximate. For example, to add a small parabolic perturbation term to the right-hand side of (1.1):

where is a constant. For each fixed, we have a classical solution of (1.3)-(1.2), then we try to prove that the limit of as goes to zero is the solution of (1.1)-(1.2), where the compactness could be obtained by the compensated compactness arguments [1,2] when the functions have only the uniform boundedness in a suitable Banach space or the technique given in [

However, the third front tracking method [

In [

where is a scalar function, and is a locally Lipschitz continuous function. He constructed a sequence of piecewise linear functions and a sequence of step functions to approximate and the initial date respectively. Let the solutions of the following Cauchy problem be:

with the initial data

For each fixed, since the simplicity of the flux function and the initial date, the sequence of solutions can be easily obtained first. Then by using the standard compactness argument by Oleinik, the convergence of can be proved as goes to zero.

Later, the above idea was used to study the existence of Riemann solutions for some special systems of two equations. For example, in [

with initial data

The more details about the Front Tracking method for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws can be found in the books [5,8] and the references cited therein.

In [

with the Riemann initial data, where since the system is hyperbolic or as required in

[

The method of flux approximation was applied by the first author of this paper to study the existence of weak solutions [10,11], the existence of global Lipschitz solutions [

In this section, we introduce a new application of the flux approximation method. We found two hyperbolic conservation systems of Temple’s type [

Consider the hyperbolic systems

and

By simple calculations, two eigenvalues of system (2.1) are

where, with corresponding right eigenvectors

and

The Riemann invariants of (2.1) are

Thus, the curves are straight lines on the -plane.

Similarly, two eigenvalues of system (2.2) are

with the corresponding right eigenvectors (2.4) and

The Riemann invariants of (2.2) are also given by (2.6)

Therefore if we consider the bounded solution in the region:, it follows from (2.5) (or (2.8)) that both characteristic fields of system (2.1) (or system (2.2)) are genuinely nonlinear in the sense of Lax [

Now we prove that both systems (2.1) and (2.2) have the same entropies.

Let. Then for smooth solutions, (2.2) is equivalent to the following system:

Considering the entropy-entropy flux pair of system (2.2) as functions of variables, we have

Eliminating the from (2.10), we have

Similarly, for smooth solutions, (2.1) is equivalent to the following system:

For the entropy-entropy flux pair of system (2.1), we have

Eliminating the from (2.13), we have also the same entropy Equation (2.11).

Using the compensated compactness arguments, we may easily obtain the global existence of weak solutions for the Cauchy problem of system (2.2) in the upper -plane or system (2.1) in the region for a suitable constant, which could be guaranteed since the curves are straight lines, where are four suitable constants. The details could be found in Chapter 7 of [

Now we consider the linear combination of systems (2.1) and (2.2):

where are two positive flux approximation perturbations.

The eigenvalues of system (2.14) are solutions of the following characteristic equation:

Two roots of Equation (2.15) are

with the corresponding right eigenvectors (2.4) and the Riemann invariants (2.6). Moreover,

Therefore both characteristic fields of system (2.14) are genuinely nonlinear in the region:.

Now we consider the Cauchy problem of system (2.14) with initial data

and have the main results in the following theorem

Theorem 1. Suppose the initial data be bounded measurable and for a suitable constant. Then for any fixed, the global weak solution of the Cauchy problem (2.14) and (2.18) exists. Moreover, for fixed (or), there exists a subsequence (or) of, which piontwisely converges, as (or) goes to zero, to the solution of the Cauchy problem of system (2.1) (or (2.2)) with the initial data (2.18).

The proof of Theorem 1: The proof of Theorem 1 can be obtained by the standard vanishing artificial viscosity method coupled with the compensated compactness argument and the famous framework of DiPerna [

with the initial data (2.18). According to the calculations given in (2.3) and (2.7), we know that the two eigenvalues of system (2.14) are

with the corresponding right eigenvectors (2.4) and the Riemann invariants (2.6).

For any constant, the curves or is a straight line on the -plane, then we may choose suitable constants such that forms a bounded invariant region. Moreover, in this region, for a suitable constant. Since system (2.14) is strictly hyperbolic and genuinely nonlinear, and the viscosity solutions of system (2.19) are uniformly bounded, then the famous compactness framework of DiPerna [

where the limit is a weak solution of system (2.14) or satisfies (2.14) in the sense of distributions. For fixed (or), and for the generalized functions, we may rewrite system (2.14) as

Since the left hand side of (2.22) or system (2.1) is also strictly hyperbolic and genuinely nonlinear, and the functions are uniformly bounded, independent of, so the DiPerna’s result [

where the limit is a weak solution of system (2.1) or satisfies (2.1) in the sense of distributions, which ends the proof of Theorem 1.

This work was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No. LY12A01030 and Grant No. LZ13A010002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11271105).