115
T. MUSHA ET AL.
Figure 5. Experimental result by the BCI system.
From these experimental results, it is considered that
the human consciousness can influence the computer
function as predicted by the brain model based on the
superluminal particles. Thus it is considered that these
results open the door to the possibility to achieve the
brain-computer interface to operate computers of move
robotic arms using nothing but human’s thoughts.
Further experiments conducted by using the random
data sampled about an hour ago to display on the screen
showed a similar result that the accumulation curve was
changed according to the human will on real time. This
result showed that the human will affected the computer
function beyond time. This result has shown the violation
of causality, which confirms our hypotheses that con-
sciousness is a field of tachyonic or superluminal matter
located beyond the barrier of the light. Some researchers
such as Prof. R. Dutheil proposed the same idea that our
consciousness or the mind is composed of tachyons lo-
cated in superluminal space-time and our subliminal
universe is merely a holographic projection of the fun-
damental universe, where information and meaning are
located [15]. From the application of superluminal hu-
man consciousness, it is considered that there is a possi-
bility to develop a computer-brain interface with higher
capabilities than the conventional electric systems.
4. Conclusions
Based upon the brain model that consciousness is com-
posed of superluminal evanescent photons, the authors
searched for the possibility to realize the brain-computer
interface both by the theoretical analysis and the experi-
ment, and they obtained the positive result for its realiza-
tion. Hence it is considered that that there is a possibility
to develop a computer-brain interface which can ma-
nipulate electric systems by thought alone. By realizing
the interface between the brain and the computer, it will
help persons who are unable to move or speak to resume
their interaction with the world around them.
5. References
[1] S. Hameroff and R. Penrose, “Conscious Events as Or-
chestrared Space-Time Selections,” Journal of Consci-
ousness Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1996, pp. 36-53.
[2] S. Hameroff, “Quantum Computation in Brain Micro-
tubules? The Penrose-Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ Model of
Consciousness,” Philosophical Transactions Royal Soci-
ety London (A), Vol. 356, No. 1743, 1998, pp. 1869-
1896.
[3] S. Hameroff, “Information Processing in Microtubules,”
Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 98, No. 4, 1992, pp.
549-561. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90137-0
[4] M. Jibu and K. Yasue, “What Is Mind? Quantum Field
Theory of Evanescent Photons in Brain as Quantum The-
ory of Consciousness,” Informatica, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1997,
pp. 471-490.
[5] M. Jibu, K. Yasue and S. Hagan, “Evanescent (Tunneling)
Photon and Cellular Vision,” BioSystems, Vol. 42, No. 1,
1997, pp. 65-73. doi:10.1016/S0303-2647(97)01686-9
[6] M. Tegmark, “Importance of Quantum Coherence in Brain
Processes,” Physical Review E, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2000, pp.
4194-4206. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4194
[7] T. Musha, “Possibility of High Performance Quantum
Computation by Superluminal Evanescent Photons in
Living Systems,” BioSystems, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2009, pp.
242-245. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.03.002
[8] M. Jibu, K. H. Pribram and K. Yasue, “From Conscious
Experience to Memory Storage and Ritrieval: The Role
of Quantum Brain Dynamics and Boson Condensation of
Evanescent Photons,” International Journal of Modern
Physics B, Vol. 10, No. 13&14, 1996, pp. 1753-1754.
doi:10.1142/S0217979296000805
[9] E. Recami, “Superluminal Motions? A Bird-Eye View of
the Experimental Situation,” Foundations of Physics, Vol.
31, No. 7, 2001, pp. 1119-1135.
doi:10.1023/A:1017582525039
[10] R. W. Ziolkowski, “Superluminal Transmission of Infor-
mation through an Electromagnetic Metamaterial,” Phy-
sical Review E, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2001, pp. 046604-046617.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.046604
[11] E. Lazlo, “Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral
Theory of Everything,” Inner Traditions, Rochester, 2004.
[12] G. Feinberg, “Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles,”
Physical Review, Vol. 159, No. 5, 1967, pp.1089-1100.
[13] B. Duplantier, J.-M. Raimond and V. Rivasseau, “Quan-
tum Decoherence, Poincare Seminar 2005,” Birkhäuser
Verlag Basel, Berlin, 2006.
[14] W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the Transition from
Quantum to Classical—Revisited,” Los Alamos Science,
No. 27, 2002, pp. 2-25.
[15] E. E. Valarino, “On the Other Side of Life, Exploring the
Phenomenon of the Near-Death Experience,” Perseus
Publishing, Cambridge, 1997.
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JQIS