T. R. BURCHELL ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. OJMI
25
In conclusion, the 32-channel phased array coil pro-
duces both a high er SNR and significantly higher quality
images than the standard 5-channel coil in routine stress
CMR despite using near identical acquisition protocols
for both coi l s.
5. References
[1] N. Al-Saadi, E. Nagel, M. Gross, et al., “Noninvasive
Detection of Myocardial Ischemia from Perfusion Re-
serve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,”
Circulation, Vol. 101, No. 12, 2000, pp. 1379-1383.
[2] T. Giang, D. Nanz, R. Coulden, et al., “Detection of
Coronary Artery Disease by Magnetic Resonance Myo-
cardial Perfusion Imaging with Various Contrast Medium
Doses: First European Multi-Centre Experience,” Euro-
pean Heart Journal, Vol. 25, No. 18, 2004, pp. 1657-
1665. doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.037
[3] E. Nagel, C. Klein, I. Paetsch, et al., “Magnetic Reso-
nance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive De-
tection of Coronary Artery Disease,” Circulation, Vol.
108, No. 4, 2003, pp. 432-437.
doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000080915.35024.A9
[4] J. Schwitter, D. Nanz, S. Kneifel, et al., “Assessment of
Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease by
Magnetic Resonance a Comparison with Positron Emis-
sion Tomography and Coronary Angiography,” Circula-
tion, Vol. 103, No. 18, 2001, pp. 2230-2235.
[5] N. Wilke, M. Jerosch-Herold, A. Zenovich and A. Still-
man, “Magnetic Resonance First-Pass Myocardial Perfu-
sion Imaging: Clinical Validation and Future Applica-
tions,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 10,
No. 5, 1999, pp. 676-685.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<676::AID-J
MRI10>3.0.CO;2-L
[6] C. Jahnke, E. Nagel, R. Gebker, et al., “Prognostic Value
of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests: Adenosine
Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion
Imaging,” Circulation, Vol. 115, No. 13, 2007, pp. 1769-
1776. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652016
[7] E. Di Bella, D. Parker and A. Sinusas, “On the Dark Rim
Artifact in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Myocardial
Perfusion Studies,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
Vol. 54, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1295-1299.
[8] T. Niendorf and D. Sodickson, “Highly Accelerated Car-
diovascular MR Imaging Using Many Channel Technol-
ogy: Concepts and Clinical Applications,” European Ra-
diology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2008, pp. 87-102.
doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0692-0
[9] S. Plein, S. Kozerke, D. Suerder, et al., “High Spatial
Resolution Myocardial Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic
Resonance for the Detection of Coronary Artery Dis-
ease,” European Heart Journal, Vol. 29, No. 17, 2008,
pp. 2148- 2155.
[10] P. Araoz, J. Glockner, K. McGee, et al., “3 Tesla MR
Imaging Provides Improved Contrast in First-Pass Myo-
cardial Perfusion Imaging over a Range of Gadolinium
Doses,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,
Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, pp. 559-564.
doi:10.1081/JCMR-200060622
[11] C. J. Hardy, H. E. Cline, R. O. Giaquinto, et al., “32-
Element Receiver-Coil Array for Cardiac Imaging,” Mag-
netic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 5, 2006, pp.
1142-1149. doi:10.1002/mrm.20870
[12] Y. Zhu, C. J. Hardy, et al., “Highly Parallel Volumetric
Imaging with a 32-Element RF Coil Array,” Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2004, pp. 869-
877. doi:10.1002/mrm.20209
[13] S. Reeder, B. Wintersperger, O. Dietrich, et al., “Practical
Approaches to the Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise Ratio
Performance with Parallel Imaging: Application with
Cardiac Imaging and a 32-Channel Cardiac Coil,” Mag-
netic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2005, pp.
748-754. doi:10.1002/mrm.20636
[14] M. Ohliger and D. Sodickson, “An Introduction to Coil
Array Design for Parallel MRI,” NMR in Biomedicine,
Vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, pp. 300-315. doi:10.1002/nbm.1046
[15] M. Fenchel, V. Deshpande, K. Nael, et al., “Cardiac Cine
Imaging at 3 Tesla: Initial Experience With a 32-Element
Body-Array Coil,” Investigative Radiology, Vol. 41, No.
8, 2006, pp. 601-608.
doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000223896.70095.49
[16] L. Shaw, D. Berman, D. Maron, et al., “Optimal Medical
Therapy with or without Percutaneous Coronary Inter-
vention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results from the
Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Ag-
gressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear
substudy,” Circulation, Vol. 117, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1283-
1291. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743963
[17] P. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, N. Pijls, et al., “Fractional
Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percuta-
neous Coronary Intervention,” The New England Journal
of Medicine, Vol. 360, No. 3, 2009, pp. 213-224.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
[18] J Schwitter, C. Wacker, A. van Rossum, et al., “MR-
IMPACT: Comparison of Perfusion-Cardiac Magnetic
Resonance with Single-Photon Emission Computed To-
mography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
in a Multicentre, Multivendor, Randomized Trial,” Euro-
pean Heart Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2008, pp. 480-489.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617