Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.07 No.15(2016), Article ID:71899,27 pages
10.4236/jmp.2016.715182
Extending the Truncated Dyson-Schwinger Equation to Finite Temperatures
Sergey M. Dorkin1,2, Marco Viebach3, Leonid P. Kaptari1, Burkhard Kämpfer3,4
1Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna, Russia
2International University Dubna, Dubna, Russia
3Institut für Theoretische Physik, Dresden, Germany
4Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received: October 16, 2016; Accepted: November 7, 2016; Published: November 10, 2016
ABSTRACT
In view of the properties of mesons in hot strongly interacting matter, the properties of the solutions of the truncated Dyson-Schwinger equation for the quark propagator at finite temperatures within the rainbow-ladder approximation are analysed in some detail. In Euclidean space within the Matsubara imaginary time formalism, the quark propagator is not longer a O(4) symmetric function and possesses a discrete spectrum of the fourth component of the momentum. This makes the treatment of the Dyson-Schwinger and Bethe-Salpeter equations conceptually different from the vacuum and technically much more involved. The question whether the interaction kernel known from vacuum calculations can be applied at finite temperatures remains still open. We find that, at low temperatures, the model interaction with vacuum parameters provides a reasonable description of the quark propagator, while at temperatures higher than a certain critical value
the interaction requires stringent modifications. The general properties of the quark propagator at finite temperatures can be inferred from lattice QCD (LQCD) calculations. We argue that, to achieve a reasonable agreement of the model calculations with that from LQCD, the kernel is to be modified in such a way as to screen the infra-red part of the interaction at temperatures larger than
. For this, we analyse the solutions of the truncated Dyson-Schwinger equation with existing interaction kernels in a large temperature range with particular attention on high temperatures in order to find hints to an adequate temperature dependence of the interaction kernel to be further implemented in the Bethe-Salpeter equation for mesons. This will allow investigating the possible in medium modifications of the meson properties as well as the conditions of quark deconfinement in hot matter.
Keywords:
Dyson-Schwinger, Bethe-Salpeter Equations, Rainbow Ladder Truncation, Quark Propagator, Chiral Symmetry

1. Introduction
The description of mesons as quark-antiquark bound states within the framework of the Bethe-Salpeter (BS) equation with momentum dependent quark mass functions, determined by the Dyson-Schwinger (DS) equation, is able to explain successfully many spectroscopic data, such as meson masses [1] - [7] , electromagnetic properties of pseudoscalar mesons and their radial excitations [8] [9] [10] and other observables [10] - [17] . Contrary to purely phenomenological models, like the quark bag model, such a formalism maintains important features of QCD, such as dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, dynamical quark dressing, requirements of the renormalization group theory etc., cf. Ref. [18] . The main ingredients here are the full quark-gluon vertex function and the dressed gluon propagator, which are entirely determined by the running coupling and the bare quark mass parameters. In principle, if one were able to solve the Dyson-Schwinger equation, the approach would not depend on any additional parameters.
However, due to known technical problems, one restricts oneself to calculations within effective models which specify the dressed vertex function
and interaction kernel
. The rainbow-ladder approximation [2] is a model with rainbow truncation of the vertex function
in the quark DS equation and a specification of the dressed quark-quark interaction kernel as
. (Here,
is a Dirac gamma matrix and
stands for the gluon propagator; g is the coupling strength and k denotes a momentum.)
The model is completely specified once a form is chosen for the effective coupling
. The ultraviolet behavior is chosen to be that of the QCD running coupling
; the ladder-rainbow truncation then generates the correct perturbative QCD structure of the DS and BS equations. Moreover, the ladder-rainbow truncation preserves such an important feature of the theory as the maintenance of the Nambu- Goldstone theorem in the chiral limit, according to which the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking results in an appearance of a (otherwise absent) scalar term in the quark propagator of the DS equation. As a consequence, in the BS equation a massless pseudoscalar bound state should appear. By using the Ward identities, it has been proven (see, e.g. Refs. [19] [20] [21] ) that in the chiral limit the DS equation for the quark propagator and the BS equation for a massless pseudo-scalar in ladder approximation are completely equivalent. It implies that such a massless bound state (pion) can be interpreted as a Goldstone boson. This results in a straightforward understanding of the pion as both a Goldstone boson and quark-antiquark bound state.
Another important property of the DS and BS equations is their explicit Poincaré invariance. This frame-independency of the approach provides a useful tool in studying processes when a rest frame for mesons cannot or needs not be defined.
The merit of the approach is that, once the effective parameters are fixed (usually the effective parameters of the kernel are chosen, cf. Ref. [22] [23] , to reproduce the known data from lattice calculations, such as the quark mass function and/or quark condensate), the whole spectrum of known mesons is supposed to be described, on the same footing, including also excited states. The achieved amazingly good description of the mass spectrum with only few effective parameters encourages one to employ the same approximations to the truncated Dyson-Schwinger (tDS) and truncated Bethe-Salpeter (tBS) equations also at finite temperatures with the hope that, once an adequate description of the quark propagators at non-zero temperature (T) is accomplished, the corresponding solution can be implemented in to the BS equation for mesons to investigate the meson properties in hot and dense matter.
At low temperatures the properties of hadrons in nuclear matter are expected to change in comparison with the vacuum ones, however the main quantum numbers, such as spin and orbital momenta, space and inner parities etc. are maintained. The hot environment may modify the hadron masses, life time (decay constant) etc. Contrarily, at sufficiently large temperature in hot and dense strongly interacting matter, phase transitions may occur, related to quark deconfinement phenomena, as e.g. dissociation of hadrons in to quark degrees of freedom. Therefore, these temperature regions are of great interest, both from a theoretical and experimental point of view. Hitherto, the truncated DS and BS formalism has been mostly used at large temperatures to investigate the critical phenomena near and above the pseudo-critical and (phase) transition values predicted by lattice simulation data (cf. Refs. [24] [25] [26] [27] and and references therein quoted). It has been found that, in order to achieve an agreement of the model results with lattice data, a modification of the vacuum interaction kernel is required. Namely, the infra-red term has to vanish abruptly in this region. Accordingly, it has been suggested [24] [25] to employ a kernel with a Heavyside step-like behaviour in the vicinity of the (pseudo-)critical temperature
. Then, it becomes possible to achieve a rather reliable description of such quantities as the quark spectral function, plasmino modes, thermal masses etc., see also Ref. [28] . However, a use of such a discontinuously modified interaction in the BS equation in the whole temperature range becomes hindered. Another strategy of solving the DS equation in a larger interval of temperatures is to utilize directly the available LQCD results to fit, point by point, the interaction kernel at given temperatures. In such a way one achieves a good description of the quark mass function and condensate for different temperatures, including the region beyond
[29] [30] . The success of such approaches demonstrates that the rainbow approximation to the DS equation with a proper choice of the interaction kernel is quite adequate in understanding the properties of quarks in hot environment. Nevertheless, for systematic studies of quarks and hadrons within the BS equation, on needs a smooth parametrization of the kernel in the whole interval of the considered temperatures. In view of still scarce LQCD data, such a direct parametrization from “experimental” data is problematic. An alternative method is to solve simultaneously a (truncated) set of Dyson-Schwinger equations for the quark and gluon propagators within some additional approximations [31] . This approach also provides good description of quarks in vicinity of
, however it becomes too cumbersome in attempts to solve the BS equation, since in this case one should solve a too large system of equations. It should also be noted that there are other investigations of the quark propagator within the rainbow truncated DS equation, which employ solely the vacuum parameters in calculations of T-dependencies of quarks [32] without further attempts to accommodate the kernel to LQCD results. As a result one finds that the critical behaviour of the propagators (e.g. chiral symmetry restoration) starts at temperatures much smaller than the ones expected from LQCD.
In the present paper we are interested in a detailed investigation of the quark propagator in the whole range of temperatures, from zero temperatures up to above
, and find a reliable smooth parametrization of the kernel. We start with the interaction kernel known at
and extend it, step by step, to larger temperatures by finding the prerequisites to meet the requirements of the LQCD and to be able to implement the kernel into the BS equation in subsequent studies of the hadron bound states at finite temperatures.
In quantum field theory, a system embedded in a heat bath can be described within the imaginary-time formalism, known also as the Matsubara approach [33] [34] [35] . Due to finiteness of the heat bath temperature T the Fourier transform to Euclidean momentum space becomes discrete, resulting in a discrete spectrum of the energy, known as the Matsubara frequencies. Consequently, the interaction kernel and the DS solution become also discrete with respect to these frequencies. Moreover, since the heat bath already fixes a particular frame, the corresponding DS and BS equations are not longer
symmetric. This requires a separate treatment of the transversal and longitudinal parts of the kernel with the need of an additional function in parametrizing the quark propagators. All this makes the consideration of the DS equation different from the vacuum case. However, here is the hope that the phenomenological interaction kernel defined at
can be, to some extent, applied for finite temperatures as well.
In the present paper we investigate the prerequisites to the interaction kernel of the DS formalism at finite temperatures to be able to investigate, in a subsequent step, different processes with the challenging problem of changes of meson characteristics at finite temperatures. Our goal is to determine with what extend the rainbow truncation of the DS equation is applicable in a large interval of temperature, starting from low values, with the effective parameters, known to accomplish an excellent description of the hadron properties in vacuum, towards temperatures above the critical values predicted by lattice calculations. We try to find a proper modification of the kernel at higher temperatures to be able to describe the properties of the quark propagator in the whole temperature range. A reliable parametrization of the T-dependence will allow to implemented it directly into the BS equation in the same manner as at
and to investigate, e.g. in-medium changes of mesons in hot environment. This is crucial, e.g. in understanding the di-lepton yields in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Our future goal is to investigate to what extend the effective parameters, known to accomplish an excellent description of the hadron properties in vacuum, can be utilized in the BS equation to investigate the hadron modifications in hot and dense matter below and above the critical or cross-over temperature. For this we consider the quark propagators from the DS equation in a large temperature range and investigate their properties and compare qualitatively with other approaches, such as the LQCD calculations.
Our paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall the truncated BS and DS equations in vacuum and at finite temperatures. The rainbow approximation for the DS equation kernel in vacuum is introduced and the system of equations for the quark propagator, to be solved at finite temperature, is presented. Numerical solution for the chirally symmetric case is discussed in Section 3, where the chiral quark condensate and spectral representation for the quark propagator are introduced. It is found that, to achieve a reasonable behaviour of the spectral functions above the critical temperature, a modification of the interaction kernel is needed. In Section 4, we consider the solution of the truncated DS equation for finite bare masses. The inflection points of the quark condensate and the mass function are considered as a definition of the pseudo-critical temperature at finite quark masses. The procedure of regularization of integrals in calculating the quark condensate from the solution of the DS equation is discussed in some detail. It is shown that, for finite quark masses, the inflection method determines the pseudo critical temperatures by ~50% smaller than the ones obtained by other approaches, e.g. by lattice QCD calculations. The possibility to reconcile the model and lattice QCD results is considered too. The impact of the infrared term in the interaction kernel in the vicinity and above the critical temperature is also briefly discussed. Summary and conclusions are collected in Section 6. A brief explanation of the meaning of the rainbow-ladder approxiamtion is presented in the Appendix.
2. Basic Formulae
2.1. Dyson-Schwinger and Bethe-Salpeter Equations in Vacuum
1Usually, for quarks of masses 


To determine the bound-state mass of a quark-antiquark pair one needs to solve the DS and the homogeneous BS equations, which in the rainbow ladder approximation and in Euclidean space read


where 














Often, the coupled equations of the quark propagator S, the gluon propagator 










2.2. Choosing an Interaction Kernel
Note that the nonperturbative behaviour of the kernel 




Following examples in the literature [2] [5] [9] [10] [12] [16] the interaction kernel in the rainbow approximation in the Landau gauge is chosen as

where the first term originates from the effective IR part of the interaction determined by soft, non-perturbative effects, while the second one ensures the correct UV asymptotic behaviour of the QCD running coupling. In what follows we restrict ourselves to two models. i) The interaction consists of both the IR and UV terms: Such an interaction is known as the Maris-Tandy (MT) model [2] . ii) The UV term is ignored at all: This interaction is known as Alkofer-Watson-Weigel [16] kernel, referred to as the AWW model. It should be noted that at zero temperatures these models, with only a few adjustable parameters―the IR strength D, the slope parameter 





2.3. Finite Temperatures
The theoretical treatment of systems at non-zero temperatures differs from the case of zero temperatures. In this case, a preferred frame is determined by the local rest system of the thermal bath. This means that the 











Accordingly, the interaction kernel is decomposed in to a transversal and longitudinal part

where 





The gap equation has the same form as in case of


Then the system of equations for A, B and C to be solved reads (cf. also Ref. [29] )



where 


for 







where 



with E being the energy scale. For the temperature range considered in the present paper we adopt







In the present paper we use several sets of parameters for the interaction kernel (3):
1)



2) 



3) AWW, MT1 and MT2 with a modified parameter D making it dependent on temperature; at low T it remains constant, equal to the values used in the AWW, MT1 and MT2 sets, while at large temperatures, where the IR contribution is expected to be screened, the parameter D becomes a decreasing function of T. In this case, since the IR term vanishes, the AWW model is not applicable. It should be noted that all these models provide values for the vacuum quark condensate in a narrow corridor, 


3. Solutions of the tDS Equation in the Chiral Limit
3.1. Order Parameters
As seen from Equation (9) in the chiral limit, i.e. at





We solve numerically the system of Equations (8)-(10) by an iteration procedure. Since the UV term in the MT1 and MT2 models is logarithmically divergent, a regularization of the integral over the internal momentum and summation over 










for the Gaussian integration with 
















The dependence of the solution on the temperature is of particular interest. It is known that in dense and hot matter there may occur different kind of phase transitions.
Figure 1. (color online) Solutions of Equations (8)-(10) for the lowest Matsubara frequency 








Figure 2. (color online) Solutions of Equations (8)-(10) in the chiral limit, 






In SU(3) gauge theory, the deconfinement transition is of first order at 






At high enough temperatures one expects a chiral restoration. This means that at a certain high value of the temperature the mass function B should vanish, indicating a possible phase transition in the hot matter. The lowest temperature at which 





The chiral condensate is defined by

where the trace is performed in spinor space. In Figure 3 we present results of calculations of the T-dependence of the mass solution B (left panel), and the normalized chiral condensate 

One infers from this figure that in a large range of T the solution 
















Figure 3. (color online) Solutions 

Figure 4. (color online) Solution 






3.2. Spectral Representation above Tc
Another important quantity characterizing the hot matter is the spectral representation of the retarded quark propagator. The Euclidean propagator can be transferred to Min- kowski space by an analytical continuation of the solution of the gap equation to real energies,

In Minkowski space, the dispersion relation for the quark propagator determines the spectral representation 



From this the importance of studying 


where 



i.e. the spectral functions 


In the present paper we focus to two particular cases.
i) Chiral limit, where the scalar, or “mass”, part 


where
ii) Zero momenta: The projection operators are 

Note that at zero momenta the energy E of the quark can be associated to a mass 


where

If one writes the dispersion relations for the model propagators (26)

then by inverting (27) one can obtain the (model) spectral density



where the integral in Equation (28) must be preliminarily carried out analytically to leave the dependence only on 

The simplest parametrization for the spectral function at finite T is suggested by the case of a free quark propagator (21), i.e. one can expect that 

With such a parametrization the spectral function 










In our calculations we use the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for minimization of 
It can be seen that both, MT1 and MT2 models (solid and dashed curves in Figure 5), provide increasing functions of T. However, the absolute values at 
Figure 5. (color online) The scaled thermal masses as function of 
propagators at




where the additional adjustable parameters are 









Another important characteristic is the behaviour of the plasmino mode as a function of the momentum





4. Solution of the tDS Equation at Finite Bare Masses
At finite quark masses the solution of the tDS equation differs from the chiral limit in at least two aspects. First, the Wigner-Weyl mode is not longer a solution. Second, the integrals over 











where





Figure 6. (color online) Left panel: Energy of the normal (solid curve) and plasmino mode (dashed curve) as a function of the scaled momentum computed with the T-dependent interaction (30). Right panel: The corresponding weights of the normal (solid curve), and plasmino modes (dashed curve) at





where


In obtaining (32) we put 


where 


pendent light-quark condensate. Exactly the same procedure is applied to determine the quark condensate at finite T, see also Ref. [30] . The remaining multiplicative divergences can be removed by normalizing to quark condensate at zero temperature.
In Figure 7 we present the dependence of the mass function 







The (pseudo-)critical temperature 


Figure 7. (color online) The solutions 

Figure 8. (color online) The inflection points (second derivative with respect to temperature) for the mass function 
Figure 7 and Figure 8 clearly demonstrate that the inflection points at finite quark bare masses provide much smaller (pseudo-)critical temperatures






5. Impact of the IR term
Analysing the relative contributions of the IR and UV terms in the interaction we find that, while at 
In Figure 9, left panel, we present the separate contributions of the IR (dashed curve) and UV (dash-dot-dot curve) terms to the tDS solution





The new effective parameters of the modified kernel should smoothly approach their vacuum values as T approaches zero and must provide a suppression of the IR interaction term above the (pseudo-)critical temperature. As in the previous case above, a simple expression simulating such a behaviour may be written by utilizing two suppression functions with a Heavyside step function-like behaviour, one acting below 


Figure 9. (color online) Relative contributions of IR and UV terms to the solution 

where 







The resulting solution



Figure 10. (color online) A possible dependence of the strength D of the IR term in the MT1 and AWW models on the temperature T (solid curve) in comparison with the case of 


Figure 11. (color online) The tDS solution 


the MT1 and AWW models with proper modifications of the interaction kernel can provide a reasonable description of the quark propagators and quark condensate at finite temperatures. Such a modified interaction can be used then in the BS equation to analyse the behaviour of mesons embedded in a hot environment.
Obviously, the effective parameters in Equation (36) can be tuned further to obtain an improved agreement with lattice calculations. This is not the goal of the present paper. We reiterate that we are interested in choosing an effective interaction suitable for solving the BS equation at finite temperature in a large interval of T, which can allow for performing qualitative analyses of the behaviour of mesons in hot (and dense) matter as well as to infer from this the relevant order parameters and other conditions for a possible phase transition at large temperature.
6. Summary
We have investigated the impact of various choices of the effective quark-gluon interaction within the truncated rainbow approximations on the solution of the truncated Dy- son-Schwinger (tDS) equation at finite temperature. The ultimate goal is to establish a reliable interaction kernel adequate in a large range of temperatures which, being used in the Bethe-Salpeter equation, allows for an analysis of the behaviour of hadrons in hot matter, including possible phase transitions and dissociation effects. For this we investigate to what extent the models, which provide an excellent description of mesons at zero temperatures, can be applied to the truncated tDS equation at finite temperatures. We find that in the chiral limit at temperatures below a critical value 









A more detailed parametrization of the IR term requires a separate and meticulous analysis of the tDS equation at finite T and will be done elsewhere.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Heisenberg-Landau program of the JINR-FRG collaboration, GSI-FE and BMBF. DSM and LPK appreciate the warm hospitality at the Helmholtz Centre Dresden-Rossendorf.
Cite this paper
Dorkin, S.M., Viebach, M., Kaptari, L.P. and Kämpfer, B. (2016) Extending the Truncated Dyson-Schwinger Equation to Finite Temperatures. Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 2071-2097. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.715182
References
- 1. Maris, P. and Roberts, C.D. (1997) Physical Review C, 56, 3369.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.3369 - 2. Maris, P. and Tandy, P.C. (1999) Physical Review C, 60, Article ID: 055214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.055214 - 3. Dorkin, S.M., Kaptari, L.P. and Kämpfer, B. (2015) Physical Review C, 91, Article ID: 055201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.055201 - 4. Hilger, T., Popovici, C., Gomez-Rocha, M. and Krassnigg, A. (2015) Physical Review D, 91, Article ID: 034013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.034013 - 5. Maris, P. and Roberts, C.D. (2003) International Journal of Modern Physics E, 12, 297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301303001326 - 6. Holl, A., Krassnigg, A. and Roberts, C.D. (2004) Physical Review C, 70, Article ID: 042203(R).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.042203 - 7. Blank, M. and Krassnigg, A. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 096014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.096014 - 8. Jarecke, D., Maris, P. and Tandy, P.C. (2003) Physical Review C, 67, Article ID: 035202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.035202 - 9. Krassnigg, A. and Maris, P.J. (2005) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 9, 153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/9/1/029 - 10. Roberts, C.D., Bhagwat, M.S., Hol, A. and Wright, S.V. (2007) The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 140, 53-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2007-00003-5 - 11. Dorkin, S.M., Hilger, T., Kaptari, L.P. and Kämpfer, B. (2011) Few-Body Systems, 49, 247-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00601-010-0108-6 - 12. Qin, S.-X., Chang, L., Liu, Y.-X., Roberts, C.D. and Wilson, D.J. (2012) Physical Review C, 85, Article ID: 035202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035202 - 13. Jain, P. and Munczek, H.J. (1991) Physical Review D, 44, 1873.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1873 - 14. Munczek, H.J. and Jain, P. (1992) Physical Review D, 46, 438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.438 - 15. Frank, M.R. and Roberts, C.D. (1996) Physical Review C, 53, 390.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.390 - 16. Alkofer, R., Watson, P. and Weigel, H. (2002) Physical Review D, 65, Article ID: 094026.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.094026 - 17. Fischer, C.S., Watson, P. and Cassing, W. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, Article ID: 094025.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.094025 - 18. Alkofer, R. and von Smekal, L. (2001) Physics Reports, 353, 281-465.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00010-2 - 19. Bender, A., Roberts, C.D. and Smekal, L. (1996) Physics Letters B, 380, 7-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00372-3 - 20. Delbourgo, R. and Scadron, M.D. (1979) Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, 5, 1621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/5/12/004 - 21. Munczek, H.J. (1995) Physical Review D, 52, 4736.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.4736 - 22. Maris, P. and Tandy, P.C. (2006) Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, 161, 136-152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.08.012 - 23. Roberts, C.D. and Williams, A. (1994) Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 33, 477-575.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(94)90049-3 - 24. Qin, S.-X., Chang, L., Liu, Y.-X. and Roberts, C.D. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 014017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.014017 - 25. Gao, F., Chen, J., Liu, Y.-X., Qin, S.-X., Roberts, C.D. and Schmidt, S.M. (2016) Physical Review D, 93, Article ID: 094019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.094019 - 26. Roberts, C.D. and Schmidt, S.M. (2000) Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 45, S1-S103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(00)90011-5 - 27. Qin, S.-X. and Rischke, D.H. (2013) Physical Review D, 88, Article ID: 056007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.056007 - 28. Karsch, F. and Kitazawa, M. (2009) Physical Review D, 80, Article ID: 056001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.056001 - 29. Fischer, C.S. and Mueller, A. (2009) Physical Review D, 80, Article ID: 074029.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.074029 - 30. Fischer, C.S., Luecker, J. and Welzbacher, C.A. (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 034022.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034022 - 31. Eichmann, G., Fischer, C.S. and Welzbacher, C.A. (2016) Physical Review D, 93, Article ID: 034013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034013 - 32. Blank, M. and Krassnigg, A. (2010) Physical Review D, 82, Article ID: 034006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.034006 - 33. Matsubara, T. (1955) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 14, 351-378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.14.351 - 34. Kapusta, J.I. (1989) Finite-Temperature Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- 35. Abrikosov, A.A., Gorkov, L.P. and Dzyaloshinski, I.E. (1963) Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics. In: Silverman, R.A., Ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
- 36. Landsman, N.P. and van Weert, Ch.G. (1987) Physics Reports, 145, 141-249.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87)90121-9 - 37. Umezawa, H., Matsumoto, H. and Tachiki, M. (1982) Termo Field Dynamics and Condensed States. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
- 38. le Bellac, M. (1996) Thermal Filed Theory. In: Landshoff, P.V., Nelson, D.R., Sciama, D.W. and Weinberg, S., Eds., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 39. Niemi, A.J. and Semenoff, G.W. (1984) Annals of Physics, 152, 105-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90082-4 - 40. Fischer, C.S., Maas, A. and Pawlowski, J.M. (2009) Annals of Physics, 324, 2408-2437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2009.07.009 - 41. Pennington, M.R. and Wilson, D.J. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 094028 (Pennington, M.R. and Wilson, D.J. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 119901, Erratum).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.094028 - 42. Souchlas, N. (2010) Infrared and Ultraviolet QCD Dynamics with Quark Mass for J = 0, 1. arXiv:1006.0942.
- 43. Cucchieri, A., Maas, A. and Mendes, T. (2007) Physical Review D, 75, Article ID: 076003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.076003 - 44. Harada, M. and Tagaki, S. (2002) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 107, 561-596.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.107.561 - 45. Hong, D.K., Miransky, V.A., Shovkovy, I.A. and Wijewardhana, L.C. (2000) Physical Review D, 61, Article ID: 056001 (Hong, D.K., Miransky, V.A., Shovkovy, I.A. and Wijewardhana, L.C. (2000) Physical Review D, 62, Article ID: 059903, Erratum).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.056001 - 46. Alkofer, R., Amundsen, P.A. and Langfeld, K. (1989) Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 42, 199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01555857
- 47. Tagaki, S. (2003) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 109, 233-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.109.233 - 48. Bender, A., Blaschke, D., Kalinovsky, Yu. and Roberts, C.D. (1996) Physical Review Letters, 77, 3724.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3724 - 49. Dorkin, S.M., Kaptari, L.P., Hilger, T. and Kämpfer, B. (2014) Physical Review C, 89, Article ID: 034005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034005 - 50. Bazavov, A., et al. (Hot QCD Collaboration) (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 094503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094503 - 51. Borsanyi, S., Endrodi, G., Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D. and Szabo, K.K. (2012) Journal of High Energy Physics, 7, 56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)056 - 52. Borsányi, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S. and Szabó, K.K. (2014) Physics Letters B, 730, 99-104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007 - 53. Bonati. C., de Forcrand, Ph., D’Elia, M., Philipsen, O. and Sanfilippo, F. (2011) Constraints on the Two-Flavor QCD Phase Diagram from Imaginary Chemical Potential. arXiv: 1201.2769
- 54. Aoki, Y., Borsanyi, S., Durr, S., Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S. and Szabo, K.K. (2009) Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009, 088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/088 - 55. Ding, H.-T., Karsch, F. and Mukherjee, S. (2015) International Journal of Modern Physics E, 24, Article ID: 1530007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301315300076 - 56. Hatsuda, T., Koike, Y. and Lee, S.H. (1993) Nuclear Physics B, 394, 221-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(93)90107-Z - 57. Gerber, P. and Leutwyler, H. (1989) Nuclear Physics B, 321, 387-429.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(89)90349-0 - 58. Fischer, C.S. and Luecker, J. (2013) Physics Letters B, 718, 1036-1043.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.054
Appendix
Rainbow Truncation
The gap equation can be written as [2]

where 


















where 



















