Applied Mathematics
Vol.05 No.17(2014), Article ID:50756,10 pages
10.4236/am.2014.517260
On Universal Mechanics and Superluminal Velocities*
Caesar P. Viazminsky1, Piere K. Vizminiska2
1Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, USA
2Department of Computer Engineering, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, USA
Email: kaysarv2@gmail.com
Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 4 August 2014; revised 26 August 2014; accepted 9 September 2014
ABSTRACT
In this work we continue to set up the theory of universal space and time and derive the Euclidean form of the scaling transformations. Two types of velocities emerge, inertial and universal, with the former bound by the light velocity c whereas the latter is unbound, and may accommodate consistently particles’ velocities possibly exceeding c. The inertial velocity is the ratio of the simultaneous source’s displacement and the corresponding length of the light trip to the observer, whereas the universal velocity has its familiar meaning for motion in a synchronous inertial frame. Defining the momentum as the product of universal velocity and mass, and utilizing the already established mass-energy equivalence, the mechanics constructed on the bases of the new concepts, named universal mechanics, admits superluminal velocities but yet coincides with the relativistic mechanics in its basic dynamical components and their inter-relations. The possibility of superluminal velocities provides a straight forward explanation of the presence of the μ-meson particles abundantly at the sea level despite their generation at high altitude and their short lifetime.
Keywords:
Inertial Velocity, Superluminal Speeds, Universal Mechanics

1. Introduction
The basic concepts and main structure of the theory of the universal space and time (UST) were discussed in [1] . It was argued that time intervals are essentially measured by spatial intervals associated with light trips. A light trip follows the same path in the universal space which can be identified with any inertial frame, one at a time. The duration and direction of a light trip are the same, but its geometric lengths differ from a frame to another. The scaling transformations (STs) determine the relation between the geometric lengths of the same light trip in two inertial frames. The STs were shown to map intrinsic units in a frame on intrinsic units in another, and were utilized to explain the presence of the
-meson particles which are generated at a high latitude at the sea level despite their short lifetime. It was also shown that in UST the longitudinal Doppler’s effect coincides with the relativistic one, but the transverse effect at right angle is absolutely absent in UST.
In the current work which continues constructing UST we furnish the following points:
· We derive the scaling transformations in a concise and transparent way illuminating its Euclidean form.
· Two types of velocity are distinguished, inertial and universal, with the former bound by light velocity, while the latter is unbound and can exceed c.
· The inertial velocity is defined by the quotient of the distance travelled by a body to the corresponding distance travelled by a light pulse. The universal velocity is the quotient of the distance travelled by the body to the corresponding time interval in a universal space.
· Defining the particle’s momentum by the product of its mass and universal velocity, we obtain all basic relativistic mechanical expressions and relations [2] -[6] .
· The paradox of the presence of the meta-stable particles at sea level finds its natural explanation in superluminal speeds of these particles.
In future works, the change of direction of a light trip between two frames and its application to explain the stellar aberration will be presented. Also, a second type of scaling transformation (STII) will be derived and applied to explain the drag effect, Sagnac effect, Michelson and Morley experiment, Michelson and Gale experiment.
2. The Euclidean Form of the Scaling Transformations
(2.1)
satisfy the relation
Figure 1. The light’s trips to stationary and moving targets as seen from two frames when each is considered universal.
(2.2)
where
Solving for
we obtain
, (2.3)
where
(2.4)
We shall call
the Euclidean factor.
Since time in the UST theory is a frame-independent entity we therefore seek the transformation from a universal frame
to a frame
co-moving with
such that the transformation and its inverse yield time durations as frame-independent. The latter demand is essential to enable one to start with either
or a frame co-moving with
(but not both) as universal. Consider thus an inertial frame
moving in the universal frame
at velocity
; the body 






































On the other hand, the quantities 


or

The required transformation is therefore

or

We call the function 







It was shown in [1] that if a light wave emanates from 






3. The Euclidean Body-Observer Triangle
The initial and final positions of the moving body in the universal frame 

The given lengths satisfy all triangle relations in Euclidean geometry, and yield a value 
By (3.1) we have

which are equivalent to the relations

In terms of the initial geometric distance T we have

By the sinuses law in trigonometry,

we have

By (3.2) the pair of sides 








Figure 2. The body-observer triangle.
This implies that, in correspondence with each body-observer triangle there is one value of



The Inertial Velocity: By (3.2), the displacement of the source, the distance travelled by the signal, and their duration 

which is obtained from (3.2), will be called the inertial velocity of the body










4. The Universal Mechanics
The universal velocity of a body 

The universal velocity of the body b is

where by (3.2)

It is clear that 

The momentum of the particle 


Multiplying both sides of the identity

by 

In the reduced system of units (




we write (4.6) in the form

The latter relation reads: the state of motion of a body with rest mass 


When 


In MKM,

If the magnitude of 

If only the magnitude of 

If both the magnitude and direction of 

Differentiating both sides of the equation 

The relation (4.14) determines the instantaneous rate at which the mass changes under the action of a force when moving at velocity



It is customary to measure mass in kg, energy in



And Equations (4.9) and (4.10) become


The Equation (4.14) which gives the rate of kinetic energy change is written as follows

And the work done by the force during a displacement 

From its definition, the momentum of a particle is related to its universal velocity and energy by

Or equivalently

For particles travelling at a universal velocity

We recall that 


The energy needed to give a stationary particle a universal velocity 
In the relations (4.21) and (4.23) the rest energy (or rest mass) is directly measurable, and the momentum of the particle is known if the body’s velocity is known. For particles that can exist only in a state of motion, like photons in vacuum, it is meaningless to talk in

and applicable to material particle, may be extended to comprise photons whose velocity is 







Unlike the relation (4.23) which connects directly measurable quantities, the latter relation which extends (4.25) to photons, requires in order to be fully meaningful a way by which either the energy or the momentum of a photon is prescribed. It is not satisfactory to merely deduce the energy and the momentum of the photon through its earlier or subsequent interaction with an external system. The contrary is required; the theory should be capable to quantify the photon’s energy and momentum in terms of inherent characteristics, and thus capable of predicting the magnitudes of its interaction with an external system. Moreover, and whereas (4.23) assigns to a particle with a rest energy 



5. Point-Wise Measurement of the Inertial Velocity
Suppose that the free source of light 

















from

The latter formula determines the inertial velocity of a moving body 








The following comments illustrate some facts concerning the inertial velocity which applies, of course, only to material bodies, but not to light signals.
(i) By (5.2), 

(ii) If a body 






(iii) In spite of the fact that the inertial velocity of any object cannot reach the velocity of light, the object itself can overtake the pulse emanating from its starting position





locity of the body is

While inertial velocity cannot reach the velocity of light, universal velocity is unbound. These facts demonstrate that there is nothing odd about the result of an experiment yielding a superluminal speed for an elementary particle.
(iv) For a fixed value of





(v) For small velocities, 

If the inertial velocity is sufficiently small we can neglect the third order term in comparison with the first order term and write

We also obtain the same result simply by neglecting 1 in the dominator on the right hand-side of (5.2) in comparison with the much larger term 
For high velocities, 

The inertial velocity can also be deduced in terms of 



The 
The 




The particles with inertial velocities not less than the latter value can cover 60 km in the earth’s frame 



Relative to the earth frame the universal velocity of the mesons particles that reach the earth surface is

one hundred times of the velocity of light!
6. The Simultaneous Positions of a Particle and Its Emitted Signal
Suppose that the body 








Equivalently,

The first and third ratios show that when the body is at a distance 

Figure 3. The simultaneous positions of the moving body and its emitted signal.

from
which (assuming not absorbed) is almost twice as much the distance travelled by the particle itself.
By (6.1), the particle and the light, arrive at




Thus light arrives first at 


Employing the STI to determine the position of the light front when 



which coincides with (6.3). The same relation has been obtained by the Galilean picture, which on scaling
and 



Substituting for 

which is the same as the classical picture, apart from the fact that the quotients are




7. Conclusion
The UST which was shown to produce the mass-energy equivalence relation in a natural way proved also capable of producing a universal mechanics that is almost identical to the relativistic mechanics. Indeed, and through defining momentum as the product of mass and universal velocity, which has no upper bound, the mechanics constructed admits superluminal velocities but yet coincides with the relativistic mechanics in its basic dynamical components and their inter-relations. The possibility of superluminal velocities provides a straight forward explanation of the abundant presence of the 
References
- Viazminsky, C.P. and Vizminiska, P.K. (2014) On Universal Space and Time. Applied Mathematics, 5, 2530-2546. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.516243
- Rindler, W. (1977) Essential Relativity. Springer-Verlag, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86650-0
- French, A.P. (1968) Special Relativity. Butler & Tanner Ltd., Frome and London.
- Steve, A. (1997) Relativity: An Introduction to Space-Time Physics. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London.
- Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1980) The Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Mould, R.A. (1998) Basic Relativity. Springer-Verlag, London.
NOTES
*This is an extended version of the paper: C. P. Viazminsky and P. K. Vizminiska, “On Universal Mechanics and Superluminal Velocities in ST”, Jan. 9, 2014, General Sciences Journal.









