Vol.3, No.11, 684-688 (2011)
doi:10.4236/health.2011.311115
C
opyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/
Health
Gender differences and laterality in maximal handgrip
strength and controlled force exertion in young adults
Hiroshi Kubota1*, Shinichi Demura2
1Faculty of Education, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan; *Corresponding Author:
2Graduate School of Natural Science & Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Received 24 July 2011; revised 15 October 2011; accepted 3 November 2011.
ABSTRACT
This study examines gender differen ces and lat-
erality in maximal handgrip strength and con-
trolled force exertion (CFE) in young adults. The
subjects were 75 healthy young males (mean
age 19.6 ± 1.6 yrs.) and 50 healthy young fe-
males (mean age 20.9 ± 1.9 yrs.). Maximal hand-
grip strength was measured tw ice. The subjects
performed the CFE test three times after one
practice trial. They matched their handgrip
strengths to the demand values, which con-
stantly changed and ranged from 5 to 25% of
maximal handgrip strength. The difference be-
tween the demand value and the grip exertion
value w as used as an estimate of CFE. Maximal
handgrip strength was significantly larger in
males than in females in both the dominant and
non-dominant hands, and was significantly lar-
ger in the dominant hand in both males and
females. Insignificant gender differences were
found in CFE of both hands. CFE was signifi-
cantly superior in the dominant hand in both
genders. In conclusions, gender differences are
present in maximal handgrip strength of the
dominant and non-dominant hands in young
adults, but not in CFE of both hands. Laterality
exists in maximal handgrip strength and in CFE
for both genders.
Keywords: Human; Handgrip Strength;
Neuromuscular Function
1. INTRODUCTION
Nerve and muscle functions are closely related to hu-
man motor performance. In particular, skillful and effi-
cient movements that demand feedback, such as manual
dexterity and hand-eye coordination, are closely in-
volved in the coordination of the voluntary movement
system, i.e. controlled force exertion (CFE) [1]. CFE is
the ability to properly adjust force exertion values to
demand values. Nagasawa et al. developed a CFE test in
which the subjects match their grip exertion values to
changing demand values on a personal computer display
[2,3].
Males have greater muscle strength than females [4].
Montoye and Lamphiear examined muscular abilities in
males and females, and reported large gender differences
in the grip and arm strengths in people aged fourteen
years or older [5]. Males performed better than females
in dexterity of hands and fingers involving nerve func-
tion [6-9]. York and Biederman reported that tapping test
performances in males and females were almost equal
[10], and Kimura et al. found no difference between
males and females with respect to the agility of the body,
hands and fingers [11]. Nagasawa et al. examined CFE
of the dominant hand in middle-aged and elderly people
and reported that males scored better than females [12].
Nagasawa et al. examined CFE of males and females
aged 15 to 86 by quasi-random target-pursuit system and
reported that an insignificant sex difference was found,
except in subjects older than 60 years [13]. From these
results, it is judged that a sex difference in of muscle
strengths was found, but that the tests involving nerve
function were not always conclusive.
On the other hand, a functional right and left differ-
ence, called “laterality”, is found in each body part with
bilateral symmetry in humans [14-17]. Laterality is in-
herited, and thus appears from infancy [18]. It is par-
ticularly evident in movements involving the arm or
fingers, such as throwing a ball, using a spoon, or writ-
ing. According to Noguchi et al., it is found in the Beans
with Tweezers test and the Pegboard test evaluating fin-
ger dexterity, and the dominant hand is found to be su-
perior [19]. Ohtsuki et al. determined that the laterality
of grading ability becomes more pronounced by the in-
fluence of an acquired factor [20]. From these researches,
although laterality in the force exertion of the upper
limbs is found, laterality of CFE has not yet been suffi-

H. Kubota et al. / Health 3 (2011) 684-688
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/
685685
ciently examined.
It is assumed that males have greater muscle strength
than females [4], gender differences are observed in CFE
of the dominant hand in middle-aged and elderly people
[12], that CFE of dominant hand does not show sex dif-
ference in subjects younger than 60 years old [13], and
laterality exists in the upper limbs [19]. However, CFE
of the non-dominant hand has not been examined, and it
has not been determined whether gender difference in
the dominant hand is equal to that in the non-dominant
hand. The properties of muscle strength may differ from
those of CFE, because muscle strength is largely affected
by muscle function, while CFE is affected by both mus-
cle and nerve functions. However, the question of
whether muscle strength differs from CFE with respect
to gender and laterality has not yet been sufficiently
examined. This study examines CFE of young adults,
but these questions need to be examined all age groups.
This study examines gender differences and laterality
in maximal handgrip strength and CFE in young adults.
2. METHODS
2.1. Subjects
The subjects were 125 healthy young people consist-
ing of 75 males (age 19.6 ± 1.6 yrs, height 170.7 ± 4.4
cm, weight 64.1 ± 8.2 kg) and 50 females (age 20.9 ±
1.9 yrs, height 160.1 ± 6.5 cm, weight 52.7 ± 7.0 kg). No
participant reported previous wrist injuries or nerve
damage to upper limbs, and all were in good health. Be-
fore the experiment, all participants were judged to be
right-handed by a handedness inventory survey [21].
Each subject could observe the computer display without
difficulty; hence, it was concluded that individual vision
did not affect measurements. No participant had previ-
ously experienced a CFE test. Prior to measurement, the
purposes and procedures of this study were explained in
detail, and written informed consent was obtained from
all participants. The protocol of this study was approved
by the Kanazawa University Department of Education
Ethical Review Board.
2.2. Test and Test Procedure
2.2.1. Measurement of Maximal Handgrip
Strength
Maximal handgrip strength was measured with a
Smedley’s handgrip mechanical dynamometer with an
accuracy of ±0.2% in the range of 0 to 99.9 kg (Sakai,
Tokyo, Japan). The subjects exerted grip strength using
the handgrip device while sitting in a chair with their
elbow straight and close to the body. The size of the grip
was set so that the subject felt comfortable squeezing it.
The maximal grip strengths of the dominant and non-
dominant hands were measured twice within a one-minute
interval, and the greater value was used in this study.
2.2.2. Measurement of CFE
CFE was measured with a Smedley’s handgrip me-
chanical dynamometer and a hand biofeedback system
(EG-100; Sakai, Tokyo, Japan). The information from
the handgrip device was transmitted at a sampling rate of
20 Hz to a computer through a data output cable after
A/D conversion. The subjects performed the CFE test
while attempting to minimize the differences between
the demand and grip values, as they were being pre-
sented on a computer. The display showed both demand
values and actual grip values simultaneously. Relative
values were used as the demand values, because the grip
strength of each individual is different. The demand
values changed at a constant frequency of 0.2 Hz from 5
to 25% of the maximal grip strength, did not regard the
fatigue of subjects, and were represented by a bar graph.
The difference between the demand values and the grip
values was used as an estimate of CFE. A smaller dif-
ference was interpreted to mean a superior CFE. The
subjects performed the CFE test in three trials using the
dominant and non-dominant hands with a one-minute
interval after one practice trial. The mean values of the
second and third trials were used for analysis. The dura-
tion of each trial was 40 seconds, and CFE was esti-
mated using the resulting data, excluding the first 15
seconds of each trial, in accordance with the criteria es-
tablished by Nagasawa et al. [2,3,12]. The order of
measuring the dominant and non-dominant hands was
random for each subject. A sufficient rest period was
given to eliminate the effect of muscle fatigue.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The data are reported using ordinary statistical meth-
ods, including mean (M) and standard deviation (± stan-
dard deviation, SD). A two-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was used to examine significant differences
among trial means (gender and dominant/non-dominant
hands). The level of significance was set a priori to 0.05.
3. RESULTS
Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations of
maximal handgrip strength according to the dominant
and non-dominant hands in males and females, and the
test results of two-way ANOVA. Gender and laterality
were found to have a significant effect. Males had
greater grip strength than females in both hands, and the
dominant hand was greater than the non-dominant hand
in both genders.

H. Kubota et al. / Health 3 (2011) 684-688
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/Openly accessible at
686
Table 2 shows the means and standard deviations of
CFE according to the dominant and non-dominant hands
in males and females, and the test results of two-way
ANOVA. Laterality was found to have a significant ef-
fect. An insignificant gender difference was found in
CFE in both hands. The dominant hand was superior to
the non-dominant hand in both genders.
4. DISCUSSION
Christine described that females sixteen years of age
and older have about two-thirds muscle strength of
males in the same age groups [4]. Moreover, these gen-
der differences are closely correlated to differences in
physiological maturation found in muscle growth. In this
study, the ratio of grip strength of males and females was
67.7% in the dominant hand and 66.4% in the non-
dominant hand. Thus, the present results agreed with
those in the above study. Christine also concluded that
gender differences of muscle strength reflect the ob-
served variation between males and females in the
physical activities of daily life [4]. In short, it is inferred
that handgrip strength is greatly affected also by daily
life pattern.
In the present study, the dominant hand displayed
maximal handgrip strength greater than that of the
non-dominant hand (about 6% in males, about 8% in
females). Crosby et al. similarly found that maximal
handgrip strength of the dominant hand is about 6%
greater than that of the non-dominant hand [22]. These
results also confirm that laterality exists in both genders.
The dominant hand develops as the individual habitually
favors one hand in daily life [23,24].
Males are superior to females in the dexterity of hands
and fingers involving nerve function [6-9]. Houx exam-
ined gender differences in subjects from 20 to 80 years
of age in choice reaction speed, which evaluates nerve
function, and reported that males were superior to fe-
males [25]. Nagasawa et al. examined CFE of the domi-
nant hand in middle-aged and elderly people, and saw
that males were superior to females [26]. There was no
gender difference found in the nerve function of the
maximal ability, which involves no information feed-
back. However, submaximal ability, which involves in-
formation feedback, revealed gender differences.
One the other hand, Kimura et al. found no differ-
ences between males and females in the agility of body,
hands and fingers [11]. Haward and Griffin did not find
any sexual differences in the pegboard test. Tests which
evaluate nerve function differ in their conclusions con-
cerning gender differences [27]. Nagasawa et al. found
gender differences in CFE of middle-aged and elderly
people, and inferred that dexterity and speed of hands
and fingers closely reflects to experiences of the move-
ments in daily life [26]. The unique experiences of indi-
viduals create the CFE gender differences. Both young
males and females have a more active daily life than the
elderly, and there is no variation in their active experi-
ences. Therefore, no difference may be discovered with
respect to CFE. In addition, a gender difference was
found in maximal handgrip strength, due to sex differ-
ence in muscle mass, but not in CFE, which evaluates
muscle and nerve function. This may depend on the fact
that, in the CFE test, subjects exert a submaximal force
but not a maximal one. Maximal handgrip strength is
Table1. Means of maximal grip strength by each group and test result (two-way ANOVA).
Males (n = 75) Females (n = 50)
Mean SD Mean SD
F-valuepartial η2
Dominant hand 48.6 8.5 32.9 6.5 F1 164.30*0.53
Non-dominant hand 45.8 7.6 30.4 6.5 F2 87.78* 0.37
F3 0.27 0.00
*p < 0.05, unit: kg, F1: gender, F2: dominant and non-dominant hand, F3: interaction.
Table2. Means of CFE value by each group and test result (two-way ANOVA).
Males (n = 75) Females (n = 50)
Mean SD Mean SD
F-valuepartial η2
Dominant hand 595.0 114.0 580.2 151.2 F1 0.00 0.00
Non-dominant hand 654.0 110.8 669.4 136.3 F2 44.89* 0.23
F3 1.94 0.01
*p < 0.05, unit: %, F1: gender, F2: dominant and non-dominant hand, F3: interaction.

H. Kubota et al. / Health 3 (2011) 684-688
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/
687687
affected by muscle mass, but the CFE test, which uses
relative values, is not largely affected by muscle mass or
maximal handgrip strength.
Demura et al. found that lateral dominance appears in
motor tasks which demand dexterity of the hands, fin-
gers and upper limbs, and where the dominant hand is
superior [28]. Noguchi et al. examined maximal hand-
grip strength and CFE in young males, and concluded
that the dominant hand is easily determined by CFE,
rather than by maximal handgrip strength [19]. The
functions which involve motor tasks develop because of
the frequent use of the dominant hand, and the develop-
mental differences between the dominant and non-
dominant hands become more pronounced over time
[18,29,30]. The present results also found that the domi-
nant hand was superior in CFE of both genders, which
agree with those in previous studies [19,21]. It is in-
ferred that laterality is found also in the young.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Gender differences are found in maximal handgrip
strength of the dominant and non-dominant hands in the
young, but not in CFE, which involves muscle and nerve
function. Laterality exists in maximal handgrip strength
and CFE of both genders.
REFERENCES
[1] Henatsch, H.D. and Langer, H.H. (1985) Basic neuro-
physiology of motor skills in sport: A review. Interna-
tional Journal of Sports Medicine, 6, 2-14.
doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025805
[2] Nagasawa, Y. and Demura, S. (2002) Development of an
apparatus to estimate coordinated exertion of force. Per-
ceptual & Motor Skills, 94, 899-913.
[3] Nagasawa, Y., Demura, S. and Kitabayashi, T. (2004)
Concurrent validity of tests to measure the coordinated
exertion of force by computerized target pursuit. Percep-
tual & Motor Skills, 98, 551-560.
doi:10.2466/pms.98.2.551-560
[4] Christine, L. W. (1985) Women, sport, & performance.
Human Kinetics Publishers Ltd. Leeds.
[5] Montoye, H.J. and Lamphiear, D.E. (1977) Grip and arm
strength in males and females, age 10 to 69. Research
Quarterly, 48, 109-120.
[6] Anianson, A., Rundgren, A. and Sperling, L. (1980)
Evaluation of functional capacity in activities of daily
living in 70-year-old men and women. Scandinavian
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 12, 145-154.
[7] Sperling, L. (1980) Evaluation of upper extremity func-
tion in 70-year-old men and women. Scandinavian
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 12, 139-144.
[8] Ruff, R.M. and Parker, S.B. (1993) Gender- and age-
specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordina-
tion in adults: normative values for the Finger Tapping
and Grooved Pegboard Tests. Perceptual & Motor Skills,
76, 1219-1230. doi:10.2466/pms.1993.76.3c.1219
[9] Speller, L., Trollinger, J.A., Maurer, P.A., Nelson, C.E.
and Bauer, D.F. (1997) Comparison of the test-retest re-
liability of the Work Box using three administrative
methods. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51,
516-522. doi:10.5014/ajot.51.7.516
[10] York, J.L. and Biederman, I. (1990) Effects of age and
sex on reciprocal tapping performance. Perceptual &
Motor Skills, 71, 675-684.
[11] Kimura, M., Hirakawa, K., Okuno, T., Oda, Y., Morimoto,
T., Kitani, T., Fujita, D. and Nagata, H. (1989) An analy-
sis of physical fitness in the aged people with fitness bat-
tery test. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and
Sports Medicine, 38, 175-185.
[12] Nagasawa, Y., Demura, S., Yamaji, S., Kobayashi, H. and
Matsuzawa, J. (2000) Ability to coordinate exertion of
force by the dominant hand: Comparisons among univer-
sity students and 65- to 78-year-old men and women.
Perceptual & Motor Skills, 90, 995-1007.
[13] Nagasawa, Y., Demura, S. and Hamazaki, H. (2010) Age
and sex differences of controlled force exertion measured
by a computer-generated quasi-random target-pursuit
system. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Inter-
actions, 10, 237-244.
[14] Dolcos, F., Rice, H.J. and Cabeza, R. (2002) Hemispheric
asymmentry and aging: right hemisphere decline or
asymmetry reduction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral
Reviews, 26, 819- 825.
doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00068-4
[15] Geshwind, N. and Behan, P. (1982) Left-handedness:
Association with immune disease, migraine, and devel-
opmental learning disorder. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 79, 5097-5100.
doi:10.1073/pnas.79.16.5097
[16] Gur, R.C., Turetsky, B.I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W.,
Hughett, P. and Gur, R.E. (1999) Sex differences in brain
gray and white matter in health young adults: Correla-
tions with cognitive performance. Journal of Neurosci-
ence, 19, 4065- 4072.
[17] Roy, E.A., Bryden, P. and Cavill, S. (2003) Hand differ-
ences in pegboard performance through development.
Brain and Cognition, 53, 315-317.
doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00133-7
[18] Chi, J.G., Dooling, E.C. and Gilles, F.H. (1977) Left-right
asymmetry of the temporal speech areas of the human
fetus. Archives of Neurology, 34, 346-348.
[19] Noguchi, T., Demura, S. and Aoki, H. (2009) Superiority
of dominant and nondominant hands in static strength
and controlled force exertion. Perceptual & Motor Skills,
109, 339-346. doi:10.2466/pms.109.2.339-346
[20] Ohtsuki, H., Hasebe, S., Okano, M. and Furuse, T. (1997)
Comparison of surgical results of responders and non-
responders to prism adaptation test in intermittent
exotropia. Acta Ophthalmol Sca nd, 75, 528-531.
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00143.x
[21] Demura, S., Sato. S. and Nagasawa, Y. (2009) Re-ex-
amination of useful items for determining hand domi-
nance. Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche,
168, 169-177.
[22] Crosby, C.A., Wehbe, M.A. and Mawr, B. (1994) Hand
strength: normative values. Journal of Hand Surgery , 19,
665-670. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90280-1
[23] Aoki, H. and Demura, S. (2008) The effect of gender and

H. Kubota et al. / Health 3 (2011) 684-688
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/
688
lateral dominance on gripping muscle power in young
adults. Sports Science for Health, 3, 1-6.
doi:10.1007/s11332-008-0054-6
[24] Aoki, H. and Demura, S. (2009) Laterality of hand grip
and elbow flexion power in young male and female
adults. International Journal of Sports Physiology and
Performance, 4, 355-366.
[25] Houx, P.J. and Jolles, J. (1993) Age-related decline of
psychomotor speed: Effects of age, brain health, sex, and
education. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 76, 195-211.
doi:10.2466/pms.1993.76.1.195
[26] Nagasawa, Y., Demura, S., Yamaji, S. and Shimada, S.
(2001) Relationship between physical fitness and ability
to coordinate exertion of force with reference to sex dif-
ference in healthy middle- and old-aged people. Japa-
nese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine, 50,
425-436.
[27] Haward, B.M. and Griffin, M.J. (2002) Repeatability of
grip strength and dexterity tests and the effects of age and
gender. International Archives of Occupational and En-
vironmental Health, 75, 111-119.
[28] Demura, S., Yamaji, S., Goshi, F. and Nagasawa, Y.
(2001) Lateral dominance of legs in maximal muscle
power, muscular endurance, and grading ability. Percep-
tual & Motor Skills, 93, 11-23.
[29] Annett, M. (1975) Hand preference and the laterality of
cerebral speech. Cortex, 11 , 305-328.
[30] Yamamoto, T. (2001) For practical and scientific condi-
tioning measurement and assessment. Tokyo Book House
HD, Tokyo.