 Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 2011, 1, 199-209 doi:10.4236/jbbs.2011.14027 Published Online November 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jbbs) Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS Repeated Physical Training and Envir onmental E nrichment Induce Neurogenesis and Synaptogenesis Following Neuronal Injury in an Inducible Mouse Model Fabiana Morroni†, Masashi Kitazawa†*, Denise Drago, David Cheng, Rodrigo Medeiros, Frank M. LaFerla* Department of N e uro bi ology and Behavior, Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, USA E-mail: *kitazawa@uci.edu, *laferla@uci.edu Received July 19, 2011; revised August 20, 2011; accepted September 5, 2011 Abstract Neuronal loss as a consequence of brain injury, stroke and neurodegenerative disorders causes functional impairments ranging from cognitive impairments to physical disabilities. Extensive rehabilitation and train- ing may lead to neuroprotection and promote functional recovery, although little is known about the molecu- lar and cellular mechanisms driving this event. To investigate the underlying mechanisms and levels of func- tional recovery elicited by repeated physical training or environmental enrichment, we generated an induc- ible mouse model of selective CA1 hippocampal neuronal loss. Following the CA1 neuronal injury, mice underwent one of the above mentioned conditions for 3 months. Exposure to either of these stimuli promoted functional cognitive recovery, which was associated with increased neurogenesis in the subgranular zone of dentate gyrus and enhanced synaptogenesis in the CA1 subfield. Notably, a significant correlation was found between the functional recovery and increased synaptogenesis among survived CA1 neurons. Collectively, these results support the utilization of cognitive and physical stimulation as approaches to promote recovery after neuronal loss and demonstrate the potential of this novel mouse model for the development of therapeu- tic strategies for various neurological disorders associated with focal neuronal loss. Keywords: Hippocampus, Water Maze, Environmental Enrichment, Cognition, Head Injury 1. Introduction Neuronal loss is the signature feature of numerous neu- rological conditions, including head injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease. Depending on the brain regions impacted by the neuronal loss, individuals may experience physical disabilities and/or cognitive impairments. Currently, stroke is the most com- mon single cause of disability, and Alzheimer disease is the leading cause of dementia among elderly, positioning these diseases as major medical concerns in our society [1,2]. Notably, no effective therapeutic strategies have been developed for these conditions so far. Experimentally, stem cell transplant has shown some potential in functional re- covery in mouse models [3-5]. However, the technical hur- dle implementing of stem cell-based therapeutic approaches in humans is still high and other issues including ethical and safety concerns need to be further evaluated. Traditionally, rehabilitation has been practically applied to help recovery of lost or impaired functions caused by disease or injury. In the case of brain injuries, physical rehabilitation and social/environmental enrichment have been proposed to stimulate new neuronal connections and enhance neuronal plasticity among survived neurons, pro- moting functional recovery [6-8]. Endogenous neuroge- nesis stimulated by rehabilitation has been reported to play a critical role in functional recovery following brain damage [9-12]. However, the underlying mechanisms as- sociated with the functional recovery have not yet been well understood. Therefore, we sought to examine the potential mechanisms and changes following rehabilita- tion in mice with defined neuronal injury. To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation after neuronal injury, we developed a novel genetic model of †These authors contributed equally to this work.
 F. MORRONI ET AL. 200 hippocampal neuronal loss that is mediated by the ex- pression of diphtheria toxin A (DTA) and tightly regu- lated by tetracycline-inducible system (Tet-off). Utiliza- tion of the calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) promoter allows the induction of DTA expression primarily in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons followed by corti- cal neurons in a time-dependent manner. Of note, our pre- vious studies have demonstrated that induction of this CaMKII/TetDTA genetic system for 20 - 25 days re- sults in extensive neuronal loss specifically in the CA1, which causes severe cognitive decline in hippocam- pal- dependent tasks [5]. Using this model, mice underwent 3-months of repeated physical training within the Morris water maze or 3-months of environmental enrichment, mimicking a physical or social rehabilitation paradigm, respectively, following a 21-day induction of neuronal injury. Data presented indicates that both training proto- cols markedly increased BrdU-positive neurons in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus. Of great relevance, we also determined that repeated physical training and environmental enrichment rescues the neu- ronal loss-induced cognitive impairment as well as the synaptic density in the SGZ and CA1 in mice with neu- ronal injury. Taken together, our data indicates that reha- bilitation following neuronal injury helps functional recov- ery through upregulation of neurogenesis in the SGZ and synaptogenesis within survived neurons. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Animals and Induction of Neuronal Injury Double transgenic CaMKII/Tet-DTA mice or single transgenic Tet-DTA mice were maintained on a 12-hr li- ght/dark cycle and freely accessible to food and water as previously described [5]. Doxycycline (2 mg/g of chow) containing food was given to all mice all the time. CA1 neuronal injury was induced in 6 - 9 month old CaMKII/- Tet-DTA mice by withdrawing doxycycline-containing food and replacing it with regular food for 21 days (re- ferred to as lesioned mice). Doxycycline was also with- drawn in Tet-DTA mice for 21 days, but no neuronal loss was triggered due to a lack of CaMKII-TRE transgene (referred to as non-lesioned control mice). All procedures were performed in accordance with the regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Uni- versity of California, Irvine. 2.2. Rehabilitation Strategies 1) Repeated physical training (Morris water maze, MWM) - Two weeks after the induction of neuronal injury, one group of mice underwent a repeated MWM experience as a physical training group, and another group of mice was not exposed to MWM at all (no training group, n = 11 - 13 per group). Mice in the training group received physical training in the water maze once a month for 3 months (please see below for detailed MWM procedure). During the 3-month training, both groups also received BrdU (50 mg/kg, ip) injections twice a week. 2) Environmental enrichment - After the induction of neuronal injury, mice were placed in environmentally en- riched cages or regular cages for 3 months (n = 7 - 8 per group). Each environmentally-rich cage (45 × 30 × 30 cm) consisted of running wheels, various types of plastic or wooden shelters, tube maze, bells, plastic balls and other toys. 3 - 4 mice shared one cage to stimulate social inter- action, and toys were cleaned weekly and rotated to dif- ferent cages. Regular cages (30 × 15 × 20 cm) contained the same bedding but did not have any toys. All mice re- eived BrdU (50 mg/kg, ip) injections every other day in the last 2 weeks of the experimental period. 2.3. Behavioral Tests 1) Morris water maze (MWM) test—The apparatus used for the water maze task was a circular aluminum tank (1.2 m diameter) painted white and filled with water maintained at 27˚C. The maze was located in a room con- taining several simple visual, extramaze cues. To reduce stress, mice were placed on the platform for 10 s prior to the first training trial. Mice were trained to swim to a 14 cm diameter circular clear Plexiglas platform submerged 1.5 cm beneath the surface of the water and invisible to the mice while swimming. On each trial, the mouse was placed into the tank at one of four designated start points in a pseudorandom order. If a mouse failed to find the plat- form within 60 s, it was manually guided to the platform and allowed to remain there for 10 s. After the trial, each mouse was placed into a holding cage under a warming lamp for 25 s until the start of the next trial. To ensure that memory differences were not due to lack of task learning, mice were given four trials a day for as many days as were required to reach criterion (<20 s mean escape la- tency before the first probe trial was run). To control for overtraining, probe trials were run for each group, both as soon as they reached group criterion and after all groups had reached criterion. Retention of the spatial training was assessed 24 h after the last training trial. Both probe trials consisted of a 60 s free swim in the pool without the platform. The parameters measured during the probe trial included (1) time spent in the platform quadrant, (2) latency to cross the platform location, and (3) number of platform location crosses. 2) Novel object recognition test—Each mouse was first habituated to an empty Plexiglass arena (45 × 25 × Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 201 F. MORRONI ET AL. 20 cm) for 3 consecutive days prior to the actual test. On the first day of testing, mice were exposed to two identi- cal objects placed at opposite ends of the arena for 5 min. In the probe trial 24 h later, mice were presented for 5 min with one of the familiar objects and a novel object of similar dimensions. Exploration counted if the mouse’s head was within one inch of the object with its neck ex- tended and vibrissae moving. The recognition index repre- sents the percentage of the time that mice spent exploring the novel object. 3) Contextual fear conditioning test—Each mouse was placed in the fear conditioning chamber (San Diego In- struments, San Diego, CA, USA) and allowed to explore for 2 min before receiving three electric foot-shocks (dura- tion, 1 s; intensity, 0.2 mA; inter-shock interval, 2 min). The mouse was returned to the home cage 30 sec after the last foot-shock. Twenty-four hours later, the mouse was placed back in the chamber, and freezing behavior was recorded during a 5 min examination period. 2.4. Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescent Staining Fixed brain halves were sliced on a vibratome at 50 μM thickness. Brain sections were mounted onto slides, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed as previously described [5,13]. For BrdU double labeling, sections were first treated with 2 N HCl for 30 min at 37˚C, then neutralized by 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.5). Prior to overnight incubation with primary antibody in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) con- taining 3% serum and 2% BSA at 4˚C, sections were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in TBS and blocked in solution containing 2% BSA. After the incubation with primary antibodies, sections were washed and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 hr at ambi- ent temperature. Primary antibodies used in this study were anti-BrdU antibody (1:500; Acculate Chemical, West- bury, NY), anti-Iba1 antibody (1:500; Wako, Richmond, VA), anti-GFAP antibody (1:1000; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-NG2 antibody (1:500; Chemicon, Temecula, CA), anti- NeuN antibody (1:000; Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti- PSD-95 antibody (1:500; Millipore), and anti-synapto- physin antibody (1:500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Secon- dary antibodies were anti-mouse or anti-rabbit conjugated with Alexafluor 488 or Alexafluor 555 (1:200; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). All fluorescent images were captured us- ing a Bio-Rad 2000 confocal microscopy (Bio-Rad Labo- ratories, Hercules, CA). Fluorescent intensity was quanti- fied by averaging 3 - 5 random fields at 60× objective or higher in each section. Grayscale images were inverted and optical density was quantified using the Image J soft- ware. Pixel intensity from two sections per animal were averaged and compared. 2.5. Statistical Analysis All data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post- test (Dunnett or Bonferroni post-test) when comparing three or more groups, or using unpaired t-test when com- paring two groups. p < 0.05 or lower was considered to be statistically significant. 3. Results 3.1. Repeated Physical Training Improves Cognitive Function after Neuronal Injury Twenty-one-day induction of DTA by withdrawing do- xycycline significantly damaged neurons in CA1 hippo- campus and dentate gyrus (DG) of CaMII/Tet-DTA (lesioned) mice (Figures 1(a) and (b)). In CA1 region, the fluorescent in- tensity of NeuN labeling reduced by 44% in lesioned mice (intensity 26.3 ± 0.8) compared to non-lesioned mice (intensity 47.1 ± 1.1), and the somatic layer of CA1 was clearly thinner due to neuronal loss (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 1). Similarly, in the molecular layer of DG, the intensity of NeuN labeling reduced by 30% in lesioned mice (intensity 52.8 ± 2.2) (a) (b) Figure 1. Twenty-one days of induction results in a focal CA1 neuronal lesioning in CaMKII/Tet-DTA transgenic mice. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining clearly indicates thinning in CA1 pyramidal cell layer in lesioned mice, while other areas in hippocampus are not damaged. (b) Magnified images in CA1 pyramidal neuronal loss fol- lowing the induction. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 F. MORRONI ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS 202 compared to non-lesioned mice (intensity 75.5 ± 1.9). However, the thickness of the molecular layer of DG was not as clear as that of CA1, suggesting that the neuronal loss in DG was not as robust as that in CA1 at 21-day induction (Supplemental Figure 1). The pattern and de- gree of neuronal injury were controlled and well-defined, consistent with previously reported observations [5]. All induced mice resulted in a similar degree of lesions, minimizing potential variability due to the severity of neuronal injury. After the completion of three repeated MWM training over the three-month period, we first ex- amined cognitive function. Lesioned mice with repeated MWM training were indistinguishable from non-lesioned control mice with or without repeated training in the es- cape latency and number of platform crosses in MWM, whereas lesioned mice without repeated training showed significant impairments on both parameters (Figures 2(a) and (b)). The improvement of cognitive function of lesioned mice by the MWM test was not simply due to the repeated ex- posures to the MWM task as we found no difference in cognitive outcomes between no trained and repeatedly trained non-lesioned mice. To further rule out this possi- bility, we examined cognition using other tests that these mice had never been exposed to. Similarly, place-based object recognition as well as contextual fear conditioning, both hippocampus-dependent memory tasks, were mark- edly rescued by repeated training in lesioned mice (Figures 2(c) and (d)). On the other hand, context-based object rec- ognition, which evaluates hippocampus-independent and corticaldependent memory, was not different in all four groups, and the recognition index was fairly consistent with our previous observation (Supplemental Figure 2). (a) (b) (c) (d) Fi gu re 2 . A repeated physical training hel ps to recover the CA1 lesion-induced cognitive impairment. After 3 months of physi cal training, all mice were tested w ith a battery of behavi oral te sts. (a) Escape latency and (b) number of platform crosses for a 24-hr probe trial of MWM show that a repeate d physical trai ning promotes a functi onal recovery in lesioned mice. (c ) Place rec ognition test and (d) contextual fear conditioning test also detect a marked recovery of hippocampus- dependent cognitive function in le- sioned mice. Each graph represents mean ± S.E.M. for n = 11 - 13, and *p < 0.05.
 203 F. MORRONI ET AL. 3.2. Repeated Physical Training Increases Neurogenesis in Dentate Gyrus We next examined molecular changes in the brain after the repeated MWM training to explain observed restora- tion of cognition. The overall neurogenesis in subgranular zone/dentate gyrus (SGZ/DG) was significantly increased in mice with physical training regardless of neuronal in- jury as detected by BrdU and NeuN double labeling (Figures 3(a) and (b)), suggesting the repeated MWM training itself stimulated neurogenesis over the period of 3 months, consistent with previous findings [11,12]. No- tably, it appeared that neuronal injury itself also stimu- lated neuron-genesis in SGZ as lesioned mice without physical trainingexhibited a marked increase of neuro- genesis compared to non-lesioned control mice without physical training (Figures 3(a) and (b)). The prolifera- tion of other cell types; microglia and astrocytes, was also quantitatively analyzed by counting BrdU/Iba1 (mi- croglia) and BrdU/ GFAP (astrocytes) positive cells in SGZ/DG and CA1 hippocampus. Although neuronal in- jury significantly increased proliferation of microglia, the repeated MWM training itself did not alter proliferation of both cell types (Figures 3(c) and (d)). 3.3. Repeated Physical Training Stimulates SynaptoGenesis in Survived Neurons We further examined whether repeated MWM training modulated synaptic plasticity in remaining neurons in the (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 3. A repeated phy sical training increases neuroge nesis in SGZ. (a) Representative low-magnification images of double immunofluorescent staining of NeuN (green) and BrdU (red) in SGZ. (b) Quantitative analysis of NeuN/BrdU positive new- born neurons in SGZ and representative high-magnification images of NeuN/BrdU double labeled neurons in SGZ. (c, d) Quantitative analyses of Iba1/BrdU (c) and GFAP/BrdU (d) and representative high-magnification images of double labeled cells. Each graph represents mean ± S.E.M. for n = 11 - 13, and *p < 0.05. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 F. MORRONI ET AL. 204 hippocampus, and subsequently contributed to functional recovery. In this regard, we measured densities of synap- tophysin, a pre-synaptic protein, and PSD-95, a post-sy- naptic protein, in DG and CA1 hippocampus. Notably, synaptophysin in CA1 hippocampus was restored in mice with repeated MWM training, and the levels were almost equivalent to those in non-lesioned control mice (Figure 4(a)). Similarly, PSD-95 levels in CA1 were also signify- cantly increased following repeated MWM training in lesioned mice (Figure 4(b)). Interestingly, neither synap- tophysin (Figure 4(c)) nor PSD-95 (data not shown) levels in DG were significantly different among four groups. 3.4. Environmental Enrichment Restores Cognition and Stimulates Neurogenesis and Synaptogenesis in Mice with Neur onal Injury Repeated physical training represented by monthly MWM is a relatively stressful procedure for mice. Acute or chron- ic stress has been reported to suppress learning and mem- ory function [14-16]. To rule out any negative impacts of stress that may interfere with the beneficial function of reha- bilitation, we next evaluated whether less stressful reha- bilitation similarly promoted functional recovery and neu- ronal changes in mice with neuronal injury. In this regard, Figure 4. Synaptogenesis in CA1 hippocampus is upregulated by a repeated physical training in lesioned mice. (a) The fluo- rescent intensity of synaptophy sin in CA1 hippocampal region was quantified. (b) The fluoresc ent intensity of PSD-95 in api- cal dendrites of CA1 pyra midal neurons was quantified. (c) The fluoresce nt intensity of synaptophysin in DG was not differ- ent among the four groups. Each graph represents mean ± S.E.M. for n = 11 - 13, and *p < 0.05. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 205 F. MORRONI ET AL. lesioned mice were housed in environmentally enriched cages. This approach mimicked rehabilitation associated with social and environmental interactions [17]. Three months of environmental enrichment partially improved hippocampus-associated cognitive function as determined by place recognition test. Lesioned mice with environ- mental enrichment explored novel object significantly more than chance level (50%) while lesioned mice singly housed in a regular cage did not distinguish novel object from familiar object (Figure 5(a)). This functional re- covery was not due to a recovery of CA1 neurons as both groups showed similar levels of CA1 neuronal thinning or loss (Figure 5(b)). Rather, it correlated well with the in- creased synaptogenesis in survived CA1 neurons (Fig- ures 5(c) and (d)). Neurogenesis was also markedly in- creased in mice under the environmental enrichment as previously described in various studies (data not shown) [12,18,19]. Taken together, both repeated physical train- ing and environmental enrichment stimulated neurogenesis (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 5. Environmental enrichment promotes functional recovery and synaptogenesis in lesioned mice. (a) Place re- cognition test was performed after the 3-month environ- mental enrichment in mice with neuronal injury. Each graph represents mean ± S.E.M. (n = 7 - 8), and *p < 0.05 from the chance (50%) le vel. (b) Immunofluorescent stai ning of NeuN in CA1 hippocampus region. (c) Synaptophysin immuno- fluorescent staining in CA1 region and (d) PSD-95 im- munofluorescent staining in CA1 region. Fluorescent inten- sity was quantified by averaging 3 - 5 random fields at 63x in each section and expressed as mean ± S.E.M. in the graph. *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 compared to non-enriched group. Scale bar = 25 m. in SGZ and synaptic plasticity among survived CA1 neurons and promoted functional recovery after neuronal injury. 4. Discussion Functional impairments of the brain are serious medical conditions that adversely affect a patient’s life in many ways. Types and severity of impairments are highly dependent on the areas and extent of the damage in the brain. Various diseases and conditions cause brain damage and functional impairments. For example, one-time stroke, hypoxia or traumatic brain injuries result in focal damage and neu- ronal loss in the brain. These are often non-progressive, and the damaged area is limited. On the other hand, Alz- heimer disease (AD), Lewy body dementia or frontotem- poral dementia are progressive neurodegenerative disea- ses, and the damaged areas spread over time together with progressive cognitive and functional impairments. Nota- bly, the incidence of brain injuries and neurodegenerative disorders are increasing every year, and effective treat- ments and medical support are in immediate demand. Rehabilitation is one of the most important post-opera- tive care strategies for patients with brain injuries. In order to better understand the therapeutic properties of reha- bilitation, we examined the some of the mechanisms as- sociated with the restoration of brain function induced by physical and social/environmental stimulation following neuronal injury in mice. Importantly, our mouse model de- velops a very defined and temporal pattern of neuronal loss following the induction of DTA by withdrawing do- xycycline from the diet. Significant pyramidal neuronal loss in CA1 region is first detected at 15 - 20 days of in- duction, followed by a neuronal loss in DG and cortecies at 25 - 30 days of induction. We have chosen the 21-day induction, which gave us a defined neuronal loss in CA1 and DG with minimum loss of neurons in cortecies. Sub- sequently, this induction paradigm impaired predominantly hippocampal-based, but not cortical-based, cognitive func- tion [5]. Notably, it has been well documented that CA1 pyramidal neurons are selectively damaged during global cerebral ischemia [20-22]. Therefore, we utilized this model as a focal neuronal injury model and examined whether repeated physical and social/environmental stimulations rescued clinical phenotypes. We applied repeated Morris water maze as physical training-based stimulation and group-housed environmental enrichment as a social and environmental stimulation for neuronal injury mouse model. A repeated water maze training paradigm has been shown to ameliorate post-seizure-induced cognitive impairments in rats [23]. Both paradigms markedly restored injury- associated cognitive function in our mouse model. Such improvement in the cognitive performance was clearly Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 F. MORRONI ET AL. 206 associated with increased synaptogenesis among survived neurons in CA1 as well as neurogenesis in SGZ. Similar findings have been reported in different rodent models of brain injuries [6,9-12]. Neurogenesis in SGZ has been reported to play a criti- cal role in memory formation and long-term memory con- solidation [24,25]. In various rodent stroke models, in- creased neurogenesis in SGZ is associated with functional recovery following skilled physical activity [11,22]. Our study showed that the neurogenesis was significantly up- regulated not only by repeated physical training but also by CA1 neuronal injury. Interestingly, the increased neu- rogenesis in SGZ was not sufficient to facilitate functional recovery in our neuronal lesioned mouse model. There- fore, it is speculated that neurogenesis together with in- creased synaptogenesis among survived neurons in CA1 ameliorate the lesion-induced cognitive impairments. This idea is supported by our recent findings on neural stem cell transplant in a mouse model of AD [26]. We have de- monstrated that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) secreted from transplanted neuronal stem cells promotes synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons and rescues AD- associated cognitive impairments without attenuating AD neuropathologies [26]. The relationship between synap- togenesis and BDNF is further supported by multiple studies demonstrating that treatment with neurotrophic fac- tors including BDNF, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) show neuroprotective effects against brain injuries in rodent models [27-29]. Environmental enrichment or exercise has been shown to upregulate BDNF and restore cognitive function in rats with chronic hypoperfusion or ischemia and blockade of BDNF production significantly negated its beneficial effects in rats with ischemia [30-32] Inter- estingly, BDNF also enhances neurogenesis after the stroke [33]. Promoting synaptogenesis in post-stroke or brain inju- ries may be a potential therapeutic strategy. In stroke and ischemia models, increased synaptogenesis by pharma- cological agents or skilled training facilitates functional recovery [6,34,35]. In this context, the repeated physical and social/environmental stimulations in our paradigm could promote the release of neurotrophic factors, which in turn contribute to the induction of synaptogenesis and functional recovery. However, additional studies are neces- sary to confirm this hypothesis. The current results provide functional and molecular evidence indicating that physical and social/environmental stimulations after neuronal injury are ways to effectively facilitate recovery without any invasive methods. Such approaches may have great potential as therapeutic alter- natives for neurological disorders associated with neu- ronal loss. 5. Acknowledgements This study was supported by grants from the National Insti- tutes of Health (NIH): NIH/NIA R01AG20335 (F.M.L.), NIH Program Project Grant, AG00538 (F.M.L.), NIH/- NIAMS K99AR054695 (M.K.). 6. References [1] J. M. Garbusinski, M. A. van der Sande, E. J. Bartholome, M. Dramaix, A. Gaye, R. Coleman, O. A. Nyan, R. W. Walker, K. P. McAdam and G.E. Walraven, “Stroke Presentation and Outcome in Developing Countries: A Prospective Study in the Gambia,” Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2005, pp. 1388-1393. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000170717.91591.7d [2] H. W. Querfurth and F. M. LaFerla, “Alzheimer’s Dis- ease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 362, No. 4, 2010, pp. 329-344. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0909142 [3] M. M. Daadi, A. S. Davis, A. Arac, Z. Li, A. L. Maag, R. Bhatnagar, K. Jiang, G. Sun, J. C. Wu and G. K. Steinberg, “Human Neural Stem Cell Grafts Modify Micro- glial Response and Enhance Axonal Sprouting in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury,” Stroke, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2010, pp. 516-523. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.573691 [4] P. Stroemer, S. Patel, A. Hope, C. Oliveira, K. Pollock and J. Sinden, “The Neural Stem Cell Line CTX0E03 Promotes Behavioral Recovery and Endogenous Neuro- genesis after Experimental Stroke in a Dose-Dependent Fashion,” Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2009, pp. 895-909. doi:10.1177/1545968309335978 [5] T. R. Yamasaki, M. Blurton-Jones, D. A. Morrissette, M. Kitazawa, S. Oddo and F. M. LaFerla, “Neural Stem Cells Improve Memory in an Inducible Mouse Model of Neuronal Loss,” Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 27, No. 44, 2007, pp. 11925-11933. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1627-07.2007 [6] A. M. Auriat, S. Wowk and F. Colbourne, “Rehabilitation after Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats Improves Recov- ery with Enhanced Dendritic Complexity but No Effect on Cell Proliferation,” Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 214, No. 1, 2010, pp. 42-47. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.025 [7] R. P. Allred, M. A. Maldonado, J. E. Hsu and T. A. Jones, “Training the “Less-Affected” Forelimb after Unilateral Cortical Infarcts Interferes with Functional Recovery of the Impaired Forelimb In Rats,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 2005, pp. 297-302. [8] J. Biernaskie, A. Szymanska, V. Windle and D. Corbett, “Bi-Hemispheric Contribution to Functional Motor Re- covery of the Affected Forelimb Following Focal Ischemic Brain Injury in Rats,” European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005, pp. 989-999. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03899.x [9] S. H. Im, J. H. Yu, E. S. Park, J. E. Lee, H. O. Kim, K. I. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 207 F. MORRONI ET AL. Park, G. W. Kim, C. I. Park and S. R. Cho, “Induction of Striatal Neurogenesis Enhances Functional Recovery in an Adult Animal Model of Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury,” Neuroscience, Vol. 169, No. 1, 2010, pp. 259-268. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.038 [10] W. L. Li, S. P. Yu, M. E. Ogle, X. S. Ding and L. Wei, “Enhanced Neurogenesis and Cell Migration Following Focal Ischemia and Peripheral Stimulation in Mice,” Devel- opmental Neurobiology, Vol. 68, No. 13, 2008, pp. 1474- 1486. doi:10.1002/dneu.20674 [11] C. Zhao, J. Wang, S. Zhao and Y. Nie, “Constraint-In- Duced Movement Therapy Enhanced Neurogenesis and Behavioral Recovery after Stroke in Adult Rats,” The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 218, No. 4, 2009, pp. 301-308. doi:10.1620/tjem.218.301 [12] F. Wurm, S. Keiner, A. Kunze, O. W. Witte and C. Re- decker, “Effects of Skilled Forelimb Training on Hippo- campal Neurogenesis and Spatial Learning after Focal Cortical Infarcts in the Adult Rat Brain,” Stroke, Vol. 38, No. 10, 2007, pp. 2833-2840. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485524 [13] M. Kitazawa, K. N. Green, A. Caccamo and F. M. LaFerla, “Genetically Augmenting Abeta42 Levels in Skeletal Muscle Exacerbates Inclusion Body Myositis- Like Pathology and Motor Deficits in Transgenic Mice,” American Journal of Pathology, Vol. 168, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1986-1997. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051232 [14] S. J. Lupien, S. Gaudreau, B. M. Tchiteya, F. Maheu, S. Sharma, N. P. Nair, R. L. Hauger, B. S. McEwen and M. J. Meaney, “Stress-Induced Declarative Memory Im- pairment in Healthy Elderly Subjects: Relationship to Cortisol Reactivity,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol. 82, No. 7, 1997, pp. 2070-2075. doi:10.1210/jc.82.7.2070 [15] K. Mizoguchi, M. Yuzurihara, A. Ishige, H. Sasaki, D. H. Chui and T. Tabira, “Chronic Stress Induces Impairment of Spatial Working Memory Because of Prefrontal Dopa- Minergic Dysfunction,” Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1568-1574. [16] C. Sandi, J. C. Woodson, V. F. Haynes, C. R. Park, K. Touyarot, M. A. Lopez-Fernandez, C. Venero and D. M. Diamond, “Acute Stress-Induced Impairment of Spatial Memory Is Associated with Decreased Expression of Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule in the Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex,” Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 57, No. 8, 2005, pp. 856-864. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.034 [17] F. D. Rose, E. A. Attree, B. M. Brooks and D. A. Johnson, “Virtual Environments in Brain Damage Rehabilitation: A Rationale from Basic Neuroscience,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 58, 1998, pp. 233-242. [18] N. Madronal, C. Lopez-Aracil, A. Rangel, J. A. del Rio, J. M. Delgado-Garcia and A. Gruart, “Effects of Enriched Physical and Social Environments on Motor Performance, Associative Learning, and Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Mice,” PLoS One, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2010, p. e11130. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011130 [19] O. Lazarov, J. Robinson, Y. P. Tang, I. S. Hairston, Z. Korade-Mirnics, V. M. Lee, L. B. Hersh, R. M. Sapolsky, K. Mirnics and S. S. Sisodia, “Environmental Enrichment Reduces Abeta Levels and Amyloid Deposition in Trans- Genic Mice,” Cell, Vol. 120, No. 5, 2005, pp. 701-713. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.015 [20] O. Bendel, T. Bueters, M. von Euler, S. Ove Ogren, J. Sandin and G. von Euler, “Reappearance of Hippocampal CA1 Neurons after Ischemia Is Associated with Recovery of Learning and Memory,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2005, pp. 1586- 1595. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600153 [21] T. Kirino, “Delayed Neuronal Death in the Gerbil Hippo- Campus Following Ischemia,” Brain Research, Vol. 239, No. 1, 1982, pp. 57-69. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)90833-2 [22] H. Nakatomi, T. Kuriu, S. Okabe, S. Yamamoto, O. Ha- tano, N. Kawahara, A. Tamura, T. Kirino and M. Naka- fuku, “Regeneration of Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons after Ischemic Brain Injury by Recruitment of Endoge- nous Neural Progenitors,” Cell, Vol. 110, No. 4, 2002, pp. 429-441. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00862-0 [23] S. J. Wong-Goodrich, M. J. Glenn, T. J. Mellott, Y. B. Liu, J. K. Blusztajn and C. L. Williams, “Water Maze Experience and Prenatal Choline Supplementation Dif- ferentially Promote Long-Term Hippocampal Recovery from Seizures in Adulthood,” Hippocampus, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2011, pp, 584-608. [24] T. Kitamura, Y. Saitoh, N. Takashima, A. Murayama, Y. Niibori, H. Ageta, M. Sekiguchi, H. Sugiyama and K. Inokuchi, “Adult Neurogenesis Modulates the Hippocam- pus-Dependent Period of Associative Fear Memory,” Cell, Vol. 139, No. 4, 2009, pp. 814-827. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.020 [25] W. Deng, M.D. Saxe, I.S. Gallina and F.H. Gage, “Adult- Born Hippocampal Dentate Granule Cells Undergoing Maturation Modulate Learning and Memory in the Brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 43, 2009, pp. 13532-13542. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3362-09.2009 [26] M. Blurton-Jones, M. Kitazawa, H. Martinez-Coria, N. A. Castello, F. J. Muller, J. F. Loring, T. R. Yamasaki, W. W. Poon, K. N. Green and F. M. LaFerla, “Neural Stem Cells Improve Cognition via BDNF in a Transgenic Model of Alzheimer Disease,” Proceedings of the National Aca- demy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 106, No. 32, 2009, pp. 13594-13599. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901402106 [27] C. R. Almli, T. J. Levy, B. H. Han, A. R. Shah, J. M. Gidday and D. M. Holtzman, “BDNF Protects against Spatial Memory Deficits Following Neonatal Hypoxia- Ischemia,” Experimental Neurology, Vol. 166, No. 1, 2000, pp. 99-114. doi:10.1006/exnr.2000.7492 [28] S. Katsuragi, T. Ikeda, I. Date, T. Shingo, T. Yasuhara, K. Mishima, N. Aoo, K. Harada, N. Egashira, K. Iwasaki, M. Fujiwara and T. Ikenoue, “Implantation of Encapsulated Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Secreting Cells Prevents Long-Lasting Learning Impairment Fol- lowing Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Insult in Rats,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 192, No. 4, 2005, pp. 1028-1037. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
 F. MORRONI ET AL. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS 208 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.014 [29] S. Lin, L.W. Fan, Y. Pang, P. G. Rhodes, H. J. Mitchell and Z. Cai, “IGF-1 Protects Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells and Improves Neurological Functions Following Cerebral Hypoxia-Ischemia in the Neonatal Rat,” Brain Research, Vol. 1063, No. 1, 2005, pp. 15-26. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.09.042 [30] M. Ploughman, S. Granter-Button, G. Chernenko, B. A. Tucker, K. M. Mearow and D. Corbett, “Endurance Ex- ercise Regimens Induce Differential Effects on Brain- Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Synapsin-I and Insulin- Like Growth Factor I after Focal Ischemia,” Neurosci- ence, Vol. 136, No. 4, 2005, pp. 991-1001. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.037 [31] H. Sun, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Liu, H. Zhu and Y. Yang, “Environmental Enrichment Influences BDNF and NR1 Levels in the Hippocampus and Restores Cognitive Im- pairment in Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfused Rats,” Cur- rent Neurovascular Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2010, pp. 268-280. [32] M. Ploughman, V. Windle, C. L. MacLellan, N. White, J. J. Dore and D. Corbett, “Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Fac- tor Contributes to Recovery of Skilled Reaching after Focal Ischemia in Rats,” Stroke, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1490-1495. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531806 [33] W. R. Schabitz, T. Steigleder, C. M. Cooper-Kuhn, S. Schwab, C. Sommer, A. Schneider and H. G. Kuhn, “In- travenous Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Enhances Poststroke Sensorimotor Recovery and Stimulates Neuro- genesis,” Stroke, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2007, pp. 2165-2172. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477331 [34] M. K. Sun, J. Hongpaisan, T. J. Nelson and D. L. Alkon, “Poststroke Neuronal Rescue and Synaptogenesis Medi- ated in Vivo by Protein Kinase C in Adult Brains,” Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 105, No. 36, 2008, pp. 13620- 13625. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805952105 [35] L. Zhang, R. L. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. G. Zhang, H. Meng and M. Chopp, “Functional Recovery in Aged and Young Rats after Embolic Stroke: Treatment with a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor,” Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2005, pp. 847-852. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000158923.19956.73
 209 F. MORRONI ET AL. Supplemental Figures Supplemental Figure 1. Twenty-one days of induction c a use s ne ur onal loss in CA1 hippocampus and dentate gyrus in CaM- KIIα/Tet-DTA transgenic mice. NeuN immunofluorescent staining shows significant reductions of the intensity in CA1 and dentate gyrus of lesioned mice. Graphs represent changes in the NeuN intensity between the two groups (**p < 0.01). No sig- nificant changes are observed between no training and trained groups. Supplemental Figure 2. Cortical-dependent cognitive function is minimally affected in lesioned mice. Cortical-dependent memory tasks, (a) context recognition and (a) object recognition tests, are also evaluated after the repeated physical training and found no difference among the 4 groups, indicating that neuronal damages are minimal in cortex areas (n = 11 - 13). Copyright © 2011 SciRes. JBBS
|