Engineering
Vol.06 No.09(2014), Article ID:48756,11 pages
10.4236/eng.2014.69058

Yongjun Xu, Xiaoming Gui, Bin Zhao, Ruiqi Zhou

Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Email: yjxu@imech.a.cn

Received 26 May 2014; revised 2 July 2014; accepted 15 July 2014

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with the in-plane elastic stability of arches subjected to a radial concen- trated load. The equilibrium equation for pin-ended circular arches is established by using energy method, and it is proved that the axial force is nearly a constant along the circumference of the circular arches. Based on force method, the equation for the primary eigen function is derived and solved, and the approximate analytical solution of critical instability load is obtained. Numerical examples are given and discussed.

Keywords:

In-Plane Elastic Stability, Buckling, Critical Load, Circular Arch, Force Method

1. Introduction

In this paper, the in-plane elastic stability of pin-ended circular arches subjected to a concentrated load is ana- lyzed. The virtual work procedure [7] [8] [14] [15] and a force method [16] are used to derive the eigenvalue equation for pin-ended circular arches and to obtain the analytical solutions for engineering applications.

2. Differential Equilibrium Equations of Hinge-Ended Arch

As Figure 1 shows, the O is centre of the circular arch ACB with a radius of R, A and B are the two hinge-ended points, C is the top points of the arch, α is the semi-angle of the arch, P is a radial concentrated load, θ is the an- gle from C to the concentrated load point.

Before buckling occur, the axial strain at any point of the arch can be expressed [1] as

. (1)

the axial force can be expressed as

. (2)

and the moment can be expressed as

. (3)

Then we have strain energy

. (4)

Figure 1. Hinge-ended arch subjected to a concentrated load.

and the external work

. (5)

then we get total potential energy

. (6)

For the in-plane elastic arches subjected to a pair of concentrated loads, based on the principle of minimum potential energy, then furnishes

. (7)

Integrating Equation (7) by parts leads to

. (8)

wherein, is the corresponding virtual radial displacement at the loading point, and are the cor- responding virtual displacements.

Because, are continuous at, and, , ,

at, so we can simplify Equation (8) as

. (9)

from Equation (9), the basic differential equilibrium equations can be obtained as

. (10)

and the force boundary conditions can be obtained as

. (11)

From the first equation of , it follows that

. (12)

where is the axial force in the arch, which means that the axial force is nearly constant along the cir- cumference of the arch.

3. Buckling of Hinge-Ended Arch Prepare

The primary structure system is shown in Figure 2, as the first degree statically indeterminate structure of a Pin-ended arch, with notations the same as Figure 1. Assume that the horizontal force at the hinge joint is the primary unknown, the release of a redundant restraint introduces a compatibility condition for displacement of the primary system. In the original structure system, the deflection/displacement at hinge joint is zero, therefore, the basic equation in the force method [16] can be expressed as

. (13)

where represents a coefficient of proportionality, which is equal to the displacement in direction at the hinge joint when the primary structure system were subjected to the unit force alone. And re- presents the displacement at the hinge joint, corresponding to, due to the external load, when the primary system is subjected to the load.

The primary structure system can be treated as a curved beam, if the flexural deformation is (in a certain con- dition) dominant. Therefore, the coefficient and the constant term can be obtained from

. (14)

where is the bending rigidity of the curved beam arch and is the infinitesimal element (differential) of the arch length. is the moment at any cross section of the primary system due to. is the axial force at any cross section of the primary system due to. is the moment at any cross section of the primary system due to the external load.

For the primary system, the vertical reaction force due to is zero, so and at cross section are

Figure 2. Simply support curve system of hinge-ended arch subjected to a certain concentrated load.

. (15)

and at cross section due to the external loads also can be obtained as

. (16)

and can be obtained from Equation (14) based on Equation (15) and Equation (16)

. (17)

. (18)

where

The primary unknown can be obtained from Equation (13), by using Equation (17) and Equation (18)

. (19)

From the vertical equilibrium of the original structure system, the vertical reaction force can be obtained as

. (20)

The constant circumferential force can be obtained by using the primary unknown and the vertical reaction forces

. (21)

substitute Equation (19) and Equation (20) into Equation (21), we have

. (22)

The differential equation for the deflection of the arch based on the relative radial displacement while lo- cal buckling occurring can be expressed as

. (23)

where is the moment at any point of the local buckling position while local in-plane buckling occurring, just as in the Euler compression bar. The compression force is approximately equal to and can be ap- proximately represented as [17] [18] . Equation (23) can then be expressed as

. (24)

The corresponding boundary conditions are

. (25)

The general solution of the ordinary differential Equation (24) is

. (26)

where and are constant coefficients.

From the BCs Equation (25), we have

. (27)

When the corresponding constant coefficients satisfy, the solution is the trivial solu- tion, which represents the state of no loading and no deflection. The instability condition is that the non-trivial constants exist, as the solution of Equation (27), namely,. That means that the corres- ponding matrix determinant of in Equation (27) is equal to 0, or

. (28)

We will have, namely,

. (29)

The approximate axial force can be expressed as

. (30)

By substituting Equation (30) into Equation (22), the n-th order critical load is obtained as

. (31)

The dimensionless critical load is defined as following

. (32)

By substituting Equation (31) into Equation (32), this will leads to the dimensionless critical load as

. (33)

where modified slenderness is given by.

4. The Critical Instability Load and Numerical Results

From Equation (33), we find that the modified slenderness and included angle of an arch play important roles in the buckling. [3] shows the variation of the first four order dimensionless buckling load for pin-ended arches subjected to concentrated load at the crown with the included angle when. It can be observed from Figure 3, the dimensionless critical load of circular arch subjected to concentrated load at crown decreases with an increase of the included angle.

Figure 4 depicts the variation of the first four order dimensionless buckling load for pin-ended arch with the loading angle when and. It can be seen from Figure 4, the dimensionless buckling load increases with loading angle increase from crown to arch feet.

Figure 5 shows the variation of the first order dimensionless buckling load for different included angles pin-ended arch subjected to concentrated load at the crown with the modified slenderness. It can be observed that the dimensionless critical load decreases with the increase of modified slenderness. Obviously, for given the radius and half-angle of the circular arches, dimensionless critical loads mainly depend on the characteristic parameter of cross section.

Example 1: A steel arch structure

Figure 3. Different order dimensionless critical load curve against included angle.

Arch structures are widely used in the engineering practice, especially in a coal mine roadway support. In this paper, a steel arch structure of roadway support in a certain coal mine is discussed, half included angle of arch is, the radius of arch is, moment inertia is, Young’s modulus of elas- ticity is and Poisson ratio is.

When n = 1, From the boundary conditions, namely, the integral constants can be determined, and the radial displacement can be obtained

Figure 5. Dimensionless critical load curve of different included angles against modified slenderness.

Table 1. Different order critical loads (kN).

Table 2. Relative error of theoretical and numerical results (%).

as, the corresponding buckling mode is shown in Figure 7(a). Similarly, when n = 2, the radial displacement is, and corresponding buckling mode is shown in Figure 7(b). When n = 3, the radi- al displacement is, and corresponding buckling mode is shown in Figure 7(c). When n = 4, the radial displacement is, and corresponding buckling mode is shown in Figure 7(d). The buckling modes of numerical results obtained by eigenvalue buckling analysis are shown in Figure 8. The lowest order buckling mode corresponds to anitsymmetric buckling form with two semi waves, and the third order buckling mode corresponds to symmetric buckling form with three semi waves, and so on. For the third-order symmetric buckling mode, there are two deformations: (a) vault sink and two sides crush to rock; (b) vault uplift and two sides crush to the roadway. Both possibly occur in practice. It also can be seen that the lowest-order buckling mode of eigenvalue buckling analysis corresponds to the second order buckling mode.

Traditionally, two buckling analysis techniques are available in ANSYS for predicting the buckling load and buckling mode shape of a structure, nonlinear buckling analysis and eigenvalue (or linear) buckling analysis. The eigenvalue buckling analysis predicts the theoretical buckling strength of an ideal linear elastic structure. This method corresponds to the textbook approach of elastic buckling analysis. The nonlinear buckling analysis employs a nonlinear static analysis with gradually increasing loads to seek the load level at which the structure becomes unstable. If not inflicting any initial defects on the ideal perfect structure, geometry nonlinear analysis couldn’t predict the critical load accurately. Generally in engineering, the method of imposing certain initial de-

(a) (b)(c) (d)

Figure 7. Buckling modes of theoretical analysis. (a), 1st order mode; (b), 2nd order mode; (c), 3rd order mode; (d), 4th order mode.

(a) (b)(c) (d)

Figure 8. Buckling modes of eigenvalue buckling analysis by ANSYS. (a) 2nd order mode; (b) 3rd order mode; (c) 3rd order mode; (d) 4th order mode.

fects is adopted to approximate the actual critical load of structures, but this method will change the geometrical model. In addition to the above two numerical methods, we put forward a transient analysis method for buckling analysis [19] , and the dynamic response of the loading process and inertial iterative process could be regarded as a kind of tiny disturbance.

Table 3 shows second order buckling critical load of several different analysis methods. Here, we impose 5‰ maximum displacement of eigenvalue buckling analysis as initial imperfection in geometrical nonlinear analysis. Figure 9 shows critical loads by different methods vary with different loading positions.

5. Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn:

1) This paper gives a theoretical analysis of the local instability of circular arches subjected to a concentrated load.

2) The virtual work method is used to derive the equilibrium equation for pin-ended circular arches, and it is shown that the axial force is nearly constant along the circumference of the circular arches subjected to a concentrated load.

Table 3. Second-order critical loads of different methods (kN).

3) Based on force methods, the primary eigenfunction equation is derived and solved, and the approximate analytical solutions of critical instability loads are obtained. The buckling load increases with loading angle increasing from crown to arch feet and the critical load decreases with increasing of modified slenderness.

4) For a practical steel arch structure of the roadway support in a certain coal mine in the south of China, the theory predictions results agree very well with the eigenvalue buckling analysis results of ANSYS.

5) The analytical solutions and numerical results prove that the method and approximate theoretical analysis formula in this paper are practical and feasible, and can be used directly in engineering practices in the eval- uation of the critical loads of arches.

References

1. Timoshenko, S.P. and Gere, J.M. (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Vlasov, V.Z. (1961) Thin-Walled Elastic Beams. 2nd Edition, Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Israel.
3. Simitses, G.J. (1976) An Introduction to the Elastic Stability of Structures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
4. Bradford, M.A., Uy, B. and Pi, Y.L. (2002) In-Plane Stability of Arches under a Central Concentrated Load. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 10-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:7(710)
5. Gjelsvik, A. and Bodner, S.R. (1962) The Energy Criterion and Snap Buckling of Arches. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 88, 87-134.
6. Schreyer, H.L. and Masur, E.F. (1966) Buckling of Shallow Arches. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 92, 1-20.
7. Pi, Y.L. and Trahair, N.S. (1999) In-Plane Buckling and Design of Steel Arches. Journal of the Structural Engineering, ASCE, 125, 1291-1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:11(1291)
8. Pi, Y.L., Bradford, M.A. and Uy, B. (2002) In-Plane Stability of Arches. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 39, 105-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00209-8
9. ABAQUS Standard User’s Manual. Copyright 2009, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc.
10. ANSYS User’s Manual 12.0. Copyright 2009 SAS IP, Inc.
11. Rajasekaran, S. and Padmanabhan, S. (1989) Equations of Curved Beams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 115, 1094-1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:5(1094)
12. Kang, Y.J. and Chai, H.Y. (1994) Thin-Walled Curved Beams. II: Analytical Solutions for Buckling of Arches. Jour- nal of Engineering Mechanics, 120, 2102-2125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:10(2102)
13. Cheng, J. and Jiang, J.J. (2003) Ultimate Load-Carrying Capacity of Long-Span Steel Arch Bridges. Engineering Mechanics, 20, 7-10. (in Chinese)
14. Pi, Y.L. and Trahair, N.S. (1996) In-Plane Inelastic Buckling and Strengths of Steel Arches. Journal of the Structural Engineering, ASCE, 122, 734-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(734)
15. Pi, Y.L. and Trahair, N.S. (1998) Non-Linear Buckling and Postbuckling of Elastic Arches. Engineering Structures, 20, 571-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00067-9
16. Long, Y.Q. and Bao, S.H. (2000) Structure Mechanics. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
17. Ding, J.G. (2003) The Analysis of Stability on Cable-Arch Structure Acted by a Concentrated Load at the Middle Point of a Span. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 27, 214-217.
18. Xiang, H.F. and Liu, G.D. (1991) Stability and Vibration of arch Structure. China Communication Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
19. Gui, X.M., Xu, Y.J. and Zhao, B. (2011) Finite Element Analysis on Stability of u-Type Arch. Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Structure Engineering, Ningbo, 5-7 November 2011, 182-186. (in Chinese)