Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.06 No.13(2015), Article ID:60434,5 pages
10.4236/jmp.2015.613185
Strong Interaction and Newtonian Potential Energy
Cvavb Chandra Raju
Physics Department, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India
Email: cvavbc@gmail.com
Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 8 September 2015; accepted 18 October 2015; published 21 October 2015
ABSTRACT
The central part of the nuclear potential energy is shown to depend on the interacting masses of the nuclear matter. This mass dependent potential energy reduces to the usual Newtonian potential energy of the interacting masses when both the interacting masses are more than a certain limiting mass. This strong potential energy results when both the interacting masses are less than the limiting mass. The potential energy is applied to two more systems here and out of which one nucleus is in the middle of periodic table.
Keywords:
Newtonian Potential Energy, Mass Limit, Boron-5, Silver-95, Uncertainty Principle

1. Introduction
The gross properties of a nucleus are obtained by applying approximate potentials derived from quantum chromodynamics. In this note, a mass dependent potential energy is derived and it applies to any nucleus. It only depends how we choose the interacting masses of the given nucleus. Whenever the masses are quite large compared to the binding energy of the system, non-relativistic quantum mechanics can be used with any potential energy. For example, the electron and proton masses are very large compared to the binding energy of hydrogen atom and non-relativistic quantum mechanics provides a very good idea of the various properties of the hydrogen atom. The universal constant of gravitation is assumed to be universal for all values of the interacting masses. Once we relax this assumption for small masses like those of a nucleus, the results are stunningly accurate as shown in [1] -[5] . Usually, we generally assume that an interaction is constant to depend on the distance of separation between the interacting masses or charges. In [1] -[5] , the Potential energy is obtained assuming no dependence of the Universal Constant of Gravitation on the distance of separation between the interacting masses. Here, we overcome this deficiency and show how ar dependent G leads to the same potential energy that is used in the references cited. Moreover, the earlier application leads one to believe that this potential energy applies only to low mass number nuclei. To overcome this misunderstanding, we apply the potential energy to such a nucleus like silver isotope with a mass number 95.
What are the gross properties of a nucleus? 1) The binding energy, 2) the ground state wave function, 3) the total spin and 4) the principal energy levels. These are some properties with which we can decide the acceptability of the given potential energy. The mass dependent potential energy is presented in Section 2. In Section 3, the mass dependent potential energy is applied to two more nuclei. These results are in addition to our results that are presented in [1] -[5] with this potential energy. Section 4 contains our conclusions.
2. Mass Dependent Potential Energy
In general, the main nuclear potential energy consists of two parts. 1). The central part and 2) the Yukawa exchange factor
. The Yukawa exchange factor limits the range of interaction. Let the central part of the nuclear potential be given by
. (2.1)
where,
is the universal constant of gravitation and,
. (2.2)
In order to account for various gross properties of nuclei such as Deuteron Helium-4 and many other nuclei, we were led to choose,
. (2.3)
The expression in Equation (2.1) looks different from the usual expression of Newtonian potential energy for interacting masses
and
. But Whenever,
and/or
. (2.4)
Equation (2.4) ensures that whenever even if one of the masses is greater than or equal to the cut-off mass
the Newtonian potential energy is restored. For example, a neutron experiences the same acceleration as any other object near the earth because one of the masses (the earth) satisfies Equation (2.4). If and when both the masses satisfy the following condition, Equation (2.1) holds.
. (2.5)
The same neutron experiences a different potential energy near a proton. It experiences the potential energy given by Equation (2.1) where for a proton-neutron there is no prior information as to the value of
.This parameter is specific to each pair of
and
. The parameter
is same for all interacting masses
and 






Let the universal constant of gravitation G be a function of r where r is the distance between the interacting masses.

where k is a dimensionless parameter and a has the dimensions of inverse length. The central part of the nuclear potential energy is given by,

Suppose we choose k in the following way:

where, f(N) is a function of the variable, 



The above condition ensures that the factor k becomes equal to and the exponential factor inside the brackets in Equation (2.6) goes to zero irrespective of the value of r. On the other hand,

If a system can be imagined to be made up of two interacting masses 




Newtonian potential energy. From Equation (2.8), it is clear that k is dimensionless as the factor 

The above factor is not a YUKAWA factor. In case of the Yukawa factor the mass appears as a single factor or as a sum but not as a product of masses. The factor a also indicates the dependence of 


That 




Assuming that f(N) = 0 for interacting nuclear masses or for those products of masses 

From the above expression, it is quite clear why 
Equation (2.14) we have,

From Equation (2.15) it must be very clear that 











If the results of an experiment or observation match the theoretical prediction then there is good reason to accept the theory.
3. Applications
The potential energy in general should also include the YUKAWA factor 

The factor 




3.1. Boron-11
Boron nucleus contains 5 protons and 6 neutrons. The core for this nucleus consists of 5 neutrons and 5 protons. There is a neutron outside this core. The total spin of this nucleus in the ground state is


where, 

The energy spectrum is given by,

Here n = 2, 3, 4 is the principal quantum number as in the case of hydrogen atom.
The ground state (n = 2) energy for this nucleus is given by,

The binding energy of this nucleus is 76.2046 MeV. The solution of the time independent Schrodinger equation led to the result given by Equation (3.5). By following
3.2. Silver
The Silver nucleus has many isotopes. One isotope of silver has a mass number of 95. This isotope is 


There must be a proton outside this core of 48 neutrons and 46 protons with an orbital angular momentum quantum number of

where 

The mass defect for this nucleus is given by
This is equivalent to a binding energy of 766.5079 MeV. With the potential energy given by Equation (3.8) the time independent Schrodinger Equation can be solved as in Refs. (1,2,3). The energy eigen-values are given by,

where,
In Equation (3.10), 

When n = 5, the ground state energy is −766.508 Mev. The binding energy of this nucleus is 766.5 MeV. To decide whether a neutron or proton is outside the core we have to examine the magnetic moment of the silver-95 nucleus.
4. Conclusions
In this note, the Newtonian potential energy is modified through a limiting mass




In general, we should use Equation (3.1) for any nucleus. Here, we use it without the Yukawa factor to explain the gross properties of silver nucleus which is in the middle of the periodic table and has 95 nucleons. Is it possible to explain these results for this nucleus through QCD?
Acknowledgements
The author is very grateful to Prudhvi RChintalapati.
Cite this paper
Cvavb ChandraRaju, (2015) Strong Interaction and Newtonian Potential Energy. Journal of Modern Physics,06,1814-1819. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.613185
References
- 1. Raju, C.C. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 459-462.
- 2. Raju, C.C. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1180-1184.
- 3. Raju, C.C. (2013) Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics, 3, 25-28.
- 4. Raju, C.C. (2015) Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 22-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.61004 - 5. Raju, C.C. (2014) Modern Physics Letters A, 29, 1450027.

