Journal of Environmental Protection
Vol.07 No.12(2016), Article ID:72208,8 pages

Laboratory Evaluation of the Impact of Contaminants on Soil Resistivity and the Consequent Effect on Plant’s Growth

Wilfred N. Igboama1, Nicholas U. Ugwu2*

1Department of Physics, Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria

2Department of Physics, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: August 29, 2016; Accepted: November 20, 2016; Published: November 23, 2016


This study is focused on investigation of the resistivity property of polluted soils and the consequent effect on the growth rate of plants. The method involves construction of an inexpensive apparatus for measuring the electrical resistivity of polluted soil in the laboratory based on application of Ohm’s law. Some pollutants such as petrol, kerosene and brine were added to the soil samples and the electrical resistivity was determined. The results showed that the quantity of petrol and kerosene added to the soil were directly proportional to the resistivity of the soil while the salt concentration varied inversely with resistivity. On the other hand, the study showed that Kerosene, Petrol and Salt solution of different concentrations have an adverse effect on the growth and development of the bean plants.


Ohm’s Law, Pollutants, Resistivity, Kerosene, Petrol, Brines

1. Introduction

Soil sullying with organic and inorganic waste products is attracting attention due to toxic effects on natural vegetation, wildlife and human health [1] . Kerosene, diesel and petrol (petroleum hydrocarbons) are powerful (potent) soil organic pollutants [2] [3] [4] . Petroleum contamination could be due to spillage, leakage, discriminating disposal of petroleum products, road traffic, industrial seepage and agricultural activities [2] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] . Petroleum of which kerosene and petrol are derivatives contain sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen in low concentrations as well as metals such as lead, nickel, sodium, calcium, copper, uranium and manganese [10] [11] [12] . It can cause chronic or acute effects on the plants. In addition to direct and indirect toxicity, the oil causes interference in the hydric relations of the plants. The toxicity leads to a reduction in the growth of the stem and the root [13] .

[14] reported that toxic hydrocarbon molecules could inhibit the activities of amylase and starch phosphorylase and thereby affecting the assimilation of starch. The most common and important symptoms observed in the plants contaminated with oil and its byproducts is a degradation of chlorophyll [15] [16] [17] alterations in the stomatal mechanism [15] , reduction in photosynthesis and respiration [15] .

Oil spillage has been known to exhibit various deleterious effects on plants by generally retarding plant growth [18] [19] [20] ; reduces aeration, by blocking air spaces between soil particles, hence creates conditions of anaerobiosis [21] , and causes root stress which reduces leaf growth thereby impairing photosynthesis [15] [16] [17] [22] .

Plants may be killed by oil pollution or suffer reduced growth and reproductive rates due to a combination of physical coating, altered soil chemistry and toxic effects of crude oil components [5] . Also, different heavy metals at supra optimal concentrations have been shown to inhibit various metabolic processes in plants resulting in their reduced growth and development [11] [23] .

Sodium chloride (brine) when introduced in the soil could increase soil salinity and thereby affects vegetation in the surrounding area. The crop growth may be altered by the interaction between salinity and nutrients in the soil [24] . [25] reported the adverse effect of a flow in roadside salinity on irrigated agriculture.

Electrical resistivity, a physical property of the soil, can be affected by these pollutants and is determined by standard measurement of soil resistance by measuring the distance and cross sectional area through which current travels. Artificially generated electric currents are supplied to the soil and the resulting potential differences are measured. Potential difference patterns provide information in the form of subsurface heterogeneities and of their electrical properties [26] . This study is focused on investigation of the resistivity and other properties of polluted soils and the consequent effect on the growth rate of plants.

2. Method

A method is presented for constructing an inexpensive plug in apparatus for measuring the electrical resistivity of polluted soil samples in the laboratory. The principle of operation of the apparatus is based on Ohm’s law. A 12v dry cell, voltmeter, ammeter was connected together with the constructed pipe and soil was introduced into the pipe as shown in Figure 1. Electric current is injected into soil in the pipe using two conducting metal electrodes connected to 12v battery as a power source. The potential differences ∆V between two points A and B and flow of current I in a linear line with the current electrode were measured by the voltmeter and ammeter respectively.

From Ohm’s law the current, which flows through a conductor of length, L and cross sectional area S, is directly proportional to the potential difference across the ends of the conductor that is:

Figure 1. Experimental set up for determining the resistivity of contaminated soil in the laboratory.

where R = resistance of the conductor (soil). It follows that


and R is also expressed as


ρ is the resistivity of the soil to be determined.

From the values of voltage (V) and current (A) measured, the resistivity is determined.

Soil was introduced into the pipes of various lengths and compacted. The initial resistivity of the soil was determined before introducing the contaminants into the soil. The contaminants introduced into the soil in the various pipes included kerosene, petrol and brine (salt solution) of different concentrations. The concentrations of brine solution are 1.0, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.10 molar. The contaminated soil samples were left for 24 hours for proper transmission into the pore spaces. Each pipe containing the soil or contaminated soil samples was connected in turns as shown in Figure 1 and current and voltage measured. The resistivity was therefore calculated using Equation (2).

The contaminants were tested on germinated beans plants to know the effective rate of growth. Six nursery bags were filled with planting soil and beans were sown in them. After germination, the plants were allowed to grow for some days. The growth rate was then measured and recorded each day for another five (5) days. Contaminants (Petrol, Kerosene and Various salt solution concentrations) were introduced into five nursery plants and one was left to serve as a control. The height of the plants from the stem above the soil level to the tip of the apical bud (terminal bud) was measured at a specified time each day. The growth rates were recorded for another five (5) consecutive days. Precaution was taken so that the contaminant was not applied directly on the plants.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 showed the resistivity of the soil when different quantities of kerosene were added. It was observed that resistivity increases with volume in the three different pipes after absorption. Figure 3 equally showed the resistivity of soil to be directly proportional to the volume of petrol added. Addition of different volumes of salt solution showed inverse variation to the resistivity (see Figure 4).

Figure 5 showed that resistivity was also inversely proportional to the length of pipe used when the same volume and concentration of salt solution was added to the soil. Figure 6 showed that when the concentration of the salt solution was increased, the resistivity of the soil sample reduced.

Figure 2. Graph of resistivity against the volume of kerosene added for different lengths (0.5 m, 0.75 m and 1.0 m).

Figure 3. Graph of resistivity against the volume of petrol added for different lengths (0.5 m, 0.75 m and 1.0 m).

Figure 4. Adding brine solution to soil sample (at constant length of pipe) decreases its resistivity.

Figure 5. Graph of resistivity versus lengths (0.5 m, 0.75 m, 1.0 m and 1.25 m) of pipe at constant volume and concentration of salt solution.

Figure 6. Resistivity is inversely proportional to the concentration of salt solution (at constant length of pipe).

In essence, pollutants such as kerosene, petrol, salt solution have effects on the resistivity of soil. From the result obtained above, it is evident that petrol and kerosene increase the resistivity of the soil while the increase in length of the tube and concentration of salt solution cause decrease in the soil resistivity, thereby increasing the soil conductivity. Generally, salt solution contains ions and when introduced into the soil increases the conductivity of the soil as is seen in Figure 4. Also increase in concentration of the salt solution increases the salinity of the soil, and thereby lower the resistivity, Figure 6.

From Figure 7 it was also noticed that there was no growth, that is increase in height from the stem above soil level to the tip of the apical bud, in nursery bean plants D, E and F after Day 6 and by Day 11 the plants were dead. Hence, the death of the plants in nursery bean plants B, C and D with different salt concentrations was in agreement [27] , that excess salinity in soil can decrease plant available water and cause plant stress.

Plants may also be killed by oil pollution or suffer reduced growth and reproductive rates due to a combination of physical coating, altered soil chemistry and toxic effects of crude oil components [5] .

The nursery bean plant C was in bending position, this could be due to high concentration of salt while the plants in D, E and F later withered and died. The control A, showed a steady and normal growth in height, Figure 7. Results obtained from this study agreed with [28] that used engine oil as a contaminant to study its effect on plant height, stem girth and moisture content. A number of researchers had revealed that crude oil inhibits plant growth [29] , reduces germination due to toxic effects on seeds [30] and leads to decrease in biomass productivity [31] .

Figure 7. The graph of growth of germinated beans against days in soil of different contaminants.

4. Conclusions

The effect of the brine solution showed that, the higher the concentration of salt, the lower is the resistivity and for petrol and kerosene the higher the volume, the higher the resistivity. Length on the other hand is inversely proportional to the resistivity.

The study also showed that Kerosene, Petrol and Salt solution of different concentrations have an adverse effect on the growth and development of the plants and also on physical properties of the soil. The presence of salinity in soils and other contaminates is detrimental to plant growth.

Cite this paper

Igboama, W.N. and Ugwu, N.U. (2016) Laboratory Evaluation of the Impact of Contaminants on Soil Resistivity and the Consequent Effect on Plant’s Growth. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7, 1802-1809.


  1. 1. Rahbar, F.G., Kiarostami, K. and Shirdam, R. (2012) Effects of Petroleum Hydrocarbons on Growth, Photosynthetic Pigments and Carbohydrate Levels of Sunflower. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10, 773-776.

  2. 2. Alkorta, I. and Garbisu, C. (2001) Phytoremediation of Organic Contaminants in Soils. Bioresource Technology, 79, 273-276.

  3. 3. Villalobos, M., Avila-Forcada, A.P. and Gutierrez-Ruiz, M.E. (2008) An Improved Gravimetric Method to Determine Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Contaminated Soils. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 194, 151-161.

  4. 4. Asghar, H.N., Setia, R. and Marschner, P. (2012) Community Composition and Activity of Microbes from Saline Soils and Non-Saline Soils Respond Similarly to Changes in Salinity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 47, 175-178.

  5. 5. Leighton, F.A. (2000) Petroleum oils and Wildlife. CCWHC Wild Health Topic, 345 p.

  6. 6. Vasudevan, N. and Rajaram, P. (2001) Bioremediation of Oil Sludge-Contaminated Soil. Environment International, 26, 409-411.

  7. 7. Peng, S., Zhoua, Q., Cai, Z. and Zhang, Z. (2009) Phytoremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils by Mirabilis jalapa L. in a Greenhouse Plot Experiment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168, 1490-1496.

  8. 8. Ahmadu, J. and Egbodion, J. (2013) Effect of oil spillage on cassava production in Niger Delta region of Nigeria. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 3, 914-926.

  9. 9. Agbogidi, O.M. and Arinze, A.N. (2014) Effects of Kerosene Contaminated Soil on the Growth of Soya Bean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). International Journal of Environmental Science, 2, 54-61.

  10. 10. Posthuma, J. (1970) The Composition of Petroleum. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Réunions. Conseil International pour l'éxploration de la Mer., 171, 7-16.

  11. 11. Davies, E. (1991) Effects of Toxin Concentration of Metals on Root Growth and Development. In: Artkinson, D., Ed., Plant Root Growth, Blackwell, London, 211-227.

  12. 12. Archambault, D.J. and Winterhalder, W.K. (1995) Metal Tolerance in Agrostic Scabra Ontario Area. Canadian Journal of Botany, 78, 766-775.

  13. 13. Alkio, M., Tabuchi, T.M., Wang, X. and Colón-Carmona, A. (2005) Stress Responses to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Arabidopsis Include Growth Inhibition and Hypersensitive Response-Like Symptoms. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 2983-2994.

  14. 14. Achuba, F.I. (2006) The Effect of Sublethal Concentrations of Crude Oil on the Growth and Metabolism of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Seedlings. Environmentalist, 26, 17-20.

  15. 15. Baker, J.M. (1970) The Effects of Oils on Plants. Environmental Pollution, 1, 27-44.

  16. 16. Malallah, G., Afzal, M., Kurian, M., Gulshan, S. and Dhami, M.S.I. (1998) Impact of Oil Pollution on Some Desert Plants. Environment International, 24, 919-924.

  17. 17. Malallah, G., Afzal, M., Gulshan, S., Kurian, M. and Dhami, M.S.I. (1996) Vicia faba as a Bioindicator of Oil Pollution. Environmental Pollution, 92, 213-217.

  18. 18. Gill, L.S. and Sandate, R.M.A. (1974) Effect of Foliarly Applied CCC on the Growth of Phaseolus aureus. Rjexb-mung on Green Gram. Bangladesh Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 35-40.

  19. 19. Glouse, A.K.M., Zaidi, H. and Attique, A. (1980) Effect of Air Pollution on the Foliar Organs of Callistemon citrinus Staf. Journal of Scientific Research, 2, 207-209.

  20. 20. Ekpo, M.A. and Nwankpa, L.I. (2005) Effect of Crude on Microorganisms and Growth of Ginger (Zingba officinate) in the Tropics. Journal of Sustainable Tropical Agricultural Research, 16, 67-71.

  21. 21. Rowell, M.J. (1977) The Effects of Crude Oil Spill on Soils. A Review of Literature 1, The Reclamation of Agricultural Soil after Oil Spills, Part 1. Department of Soil Science, University of Alberta Canada, Canada, 33-355.

  22. 22. Smith, B., Stachowish, M. and Volken-Burgh, E. (1989) Cellular Processes Limiting Growth in Plants under Hypoxic Root Stress. Experimental Botany, 40, 89-94.

  23. 23. Bala, R. and Setia, R.C. (1990) Some Aspects of Lead Toxicity in Plants. Narendia Publishing House, India, 268.

  24. 24. Fores, P., Carvajal, M., Cerda, A. and Marrinez, V. (2001) Salinity and Ammonium/Nitrate Interactions on Tomato Plant Development, Nutrition and Metabolites. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24, 1561-1573.

  25. 25. Chinnusamy, N., Jagendorf, A. and Zhu, J. (2005) Understanding and Improving Salt Tolerance in Plants. Crop Science, 45, 437-448.

  26. 26. Kearey, P., Brooks, M. and Hill, I. (2002) An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

  27. 27. Krista, P.E. (2003) The Basics of Salinity and Sodicity Effects on Soil Physical Properties (Information Highlight for the General Public). Adapted from a paper by Nikos J. Warrence, Krista E. Pearson and James W. Bauder.

  28. 28. Adenipekun, C.O. and Kassim, L.O. (2006) Effects of Spent Engine Oil on the Growth Parameters and Moisture Content of Celosia argentea. In: In: Akpan, G. and Odoemena, C.S.J., Eds., Botany and Environmental Health, University of Uyo, Uyo, 108-111.

  29. 29. Cook, F.D. and Westlake, D.W.S. (1974) Information Canada. Cat. No R72-12774.

  30. 30. Udo, E.J. and Opara, O.O. (1984) Some Studies on the Effects of Crude Oil Pollution of Soil on Plant Growth. Journal of Biology and Applied Chemistry, 11, 26-29.

  31. 31. Odejimi, R.A.O. and Ogbalu, O. (2006) Physiological Impact of Crude Oil Polluted Soil on Growth, Carbohydrate and Protein Levels of Edible Shoot of Fluted Pumpkin (Telfera occidentalis). In: Akpan, G. and Odoemena, C.S.J., Eds., Botany and Environmental Health, University of Uyo, Uyo, 102-105.