ABSTRACT

This study assessed the rainfall trends and changes over Mono river basin under the highest greenhouse gas emission scenario RCP8.5. Simulations of eight regional climate models (RCMs) provided by Africa-CORDEX program were considered. To analyze the performance of a set of regional climate models, the MBE (mean bias error), the RMSE (root mean square error), the volume bias (VB), correlation coefficient (R²) and the t-Test statistics were calculated. The precipitation concentration index (PCI), Mann-Kendall trend test, Theil-Sen’s slope estimator (β), and relative percentage change methods were also adopted for data analysis. Changes from the baseline period 1981-2010 were computed for far future (2061-2090 and 2071-2100). As results, the analysis herein highlighted the multi-models’ mean ability to simulate the Mono river basin rainfall adequately. Two distinct patterns emerged from the calculated PCI indicating that stations in southern basin will have moderate, irregular, and strongly irregular rainfall concentrations, whereas stations in northern basin will have irregular and strongly irregular rainfall concentrations. Significant declining in the rainfall was detected in most stations for the future period. The evolution of the monthly average rainfall amounts will be broadly characterized by a decrease and increase between 32.4 and 12% with late rainy seasons. It is understood that future changes in rainfall distribution and trends will affect the availability of water for crops, which should affect the productivity of rain fed agriculture.

Keywords:

Future Rainfall, Variability, Trend, Change, Mono Basin

1. Introduction

Global warming and climate variability are emerging as the foremost environmental problems in the 21st century, particularly in developing countries. The research from scientific community on climate change has estimated and predicts that the frequency, intensity and extent of these phenomena (drought on continental regions and violent cyclonic storms) are and will be likely to increase across the world which will increase the exposure of populations in the years to come [1] .

Africa is one of the most vulnerable continents to climate change across the world. This situation will aggravate by different interactions between population and ecosystems and low adaptive capacity [2] [3] . For example, this continent was particularly hit in 2007 by floods which affected more than two millions lives in the Central and Eastern parts in January, and 2.6 millions victims in a large region from west to east in July and August of the same year [4] .

It is thus common that the developing countries’ low-income populations are likely to be affected by factors related to global warming, as West Africa one of the regions in the world that are most vulnerable to climate change. This is particularly true for rural areas in West Africa where agriculture is the most prominent instrument for securing income and overcoming poverty. This region experiencing exponential population growth is already facing the consequences of climate change through gradual land degradation and loss of croplands and ecosystem services [5] [6] and high water stress and scarcity year [7] , along with recurrent and localized droughts and flash floods year [8] . These conditions, expected to be exacerbated in the future, constitute significant threats to water resources, energy, agricultural activities and ecosystem services.

For the specific case of Togo, according to the report of Togo Republic [9] , floods, droughts, late rains, high temperatures and high winds, are the major risks in the country. The drought covers the entire territory except for the coastal zone which is however facing sea level rise risk. It should be noted that among the latest climatic events, flooding takes precedence over other risks with its share of material damage and loss of life. It is becoming more and more dangerous across the whole country. Activities which are most exposed to these risks are farming, livestock farming, marketing of agricultural products and market gardening. Mono river basin that is our study area has not been spared by these events [10] [11] .

To better understand climate change and its consequences, different types of models have been developed. The first generation of models is the General Circulation Models (GCMs). The second is the regional climate models (RCMs). Global climate models (GCMs) face enormous difficulties and cannot represent the climate in the region because of their very rough spatial resolution (200 to 300 km). Therefore, those models are only important when it comes to representing climate on a very large scale of space. But at regional level, they present many limitations [3] . In order to rectify this challenge, Regional Climate Models (RCMs) are developed to downscale results from GCMs scales to very lower scales. Data from CORDEX (Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment) are now proposed in several studies because of their high spatial resolution (10 to 100 km) [12] . However, in general, these RCMs have different biases depending on the climatic zones and the multi-model approach generally gives remarkable results compared to the use of a single RCM. We have noted that the analysis and evaluation of climate change using RCMs are generally made at the regional scale of the Cordex-Africa domain; thus, most of the RCMs multi-model studies have focused on Africa [13] , West Africa [14] or on the Sahel [15] scale. Few studies have been done locally over Cordex-Africa countries as well as at basins domain over Africa.

The aim of this study is therefore threefold: 1) to evaluate the performance of some RCMs in simulating rainfall over Mono basin in Togo (West Africa); 2) to exanimate trends of future rainfall over Mono basin in Togo (West-Africa).; 3) to project future changes in rainfall in the period 2061-2090 and 2071-2100 using a regional climate model (Africa-cordex) under highest emission scenarios (i.e. RCP8.5).

The study area, used data and methods are described in the next Section 2. Section 3 was only reserved to the results. The Section 4 represents the discussions and conclusion is in the Section 5.

2. Study Area, Data and Methods Used

2.1. Study Area

Located on the coast of the Gulf of Guinea in West Africa, Togo (TG) has a surface area of 56,600 km², bordering the Atlantic Ocean in the south, Burkina Faso in the north, Benin in the east and Ghana in the west. The Togolese population was estimated at 6.3 million inhabitants in 2007 according to the report of UNDP in 2007. The main important rivers are Oti, Mono, Kara, Keran, Koumongou, Anie, Zio and Haho. Mono basin, which is the study area, is located in the Gulf of Guinea region, more precisely between 6˚16'N and 9˚20'N and 42˚E and 20˚25'E (Figure 1). The Mono river basin is almost entirely in Togo although its lower course is between Togo and Bénin. Our study considered the part in Togo. It houses a dam of hydroelectric power plant called Nangbeto. Draining a surface of 25,400 km², the Mono river is the major one of Togo [10] [11] . The climate of the Mono river basin is the one of West Africa which is controlled by the interaction of two air masses; the influence of which varies throughout the year with the north-south movement of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). Hot and dry continental air masses originating from the high pressure system above the Sahara desert give rise to dusty Harmattan winds over most of West Africa from November to February. In summer, moist equatorial air masses originating over the Atlantic Ocean bring annual monsoon rains [15] [16] . Within this West African context, rainfall in the study area is characterized by two types of rainfall regimes. In southern basin, (from 6˚16'N to 7˚30'N) there are two rainy seasons which extend from mid-March to mid-July and from mid-August to October. In northern basin (from 7˚30'N to 9˚20'N), there is one rainy season which extends from April to October. The

average discharge of the main watercourse of this basin is approximately 106 m³/s at Nangbeto hydrometric station from 1981 to 2010. The annual rainfall average is 1915 mm from 1981 to 2010. The mean maximum temperature for the whole basin varies between 28.4˚C and 33.7˚C while the mean of minimum temperature fluctuates between 24.3˚C and 27.8˚C from 1981 to 2010. According to the report of WAEMU in 2006, the population of the basin is more than two million, with an annual increase of 2.9%. This population also distributed at high densities in the south of the basin has as main activities, agriculture (mainly rain fed); in the lower valleys, fishing and salt-farming are the major activities [17] .

2.2. Data Used

Two sources of data have been used in this paper. The first one is CORDEX program archives. The CORDEX program archives outputs from a set of RCM simulations over different regions in the world. In this study datasets from CORDEX Africa are accessed from https://esgf-data.dkrz.de/projects/esgf-dkrz/. The datasets are quality controlled. The spatial grid resolutions of all CORDEX Africa RCMs were set to longitude 0.44˚ and latitude 0.44˚ using a rotated pole system coordinate. These models operate over an equatorial domain with a quasi-uniform resolution of approximately 50 km by 50 km. The components of the model are based on the scenario or Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP). Detailed description of CORDEX RCMs and their dynamics as well as their physical parameterization are given by [3] . Those authors listed the details of CORDEX-RCMs and the driving GCMs: CNRM-CERFACS-CNRM-CM5 (CNRM), ICHEC-EC-EARTH (ICHEC) and MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR (MPI).These data have also been used over West-Africa [10] . Table 1 presents the eight climatic models used with daily time step outputs. The last source of data is the observed rainfall provided by the National Meteorology Agency of Togo (Météo Togo) for the period 1980-2010 for 12 stations spatially located as shown by Figure 1. The stations were selected based on the length of record period and the relative completeness of the data.

2.3. Methods

In this study, to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated data, from the models described above, the following statistical estimators were used: MBE (Mean Bias Error), RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), MPE (mean percentage error) and the correlation coefficient (R²), to test the linear relationship between simulated and observed values. For higher modeling accuracy, these estimators should be closer to zero, and the correlation coefficient, (R²), should approach to 1. However, these estimated errors provide reasonable criteria to compare models but do not objectively indicate whether the estimates from a model are statistically significant. The t-Test statistic allows models to be compared and at the same time it

indicates whether a model’s estimate is statistically significant at a particular confidence level. So, the t-Test was carried out on the models to determine the statistical significance of the predicted values. Lawin et al. (2019) used these methods in a similar study [11] :

Mean Bias Error (MBE)

To evaluate the accuracy of the predicted data from the models described above, this test provides information on the long-term performance of a model. The validation period is from 1999 to 2008. A low MBE value is desired. A negative value gives the average amount of underestimation in the calculated value. The MBE value is computed by Equation (1). The subscript i refer to the i^th value of the daily rainfall; n is the number of the daily rainfall. The subscripts “s.” and “o.” refer to the simulated and measured daily climatic parameters (rainfall) values. A percentage error between −10% and +10% is considered acceptable [17] .

$\text{MBE}=\frac{1}{n}{\displaystyle \sum _1^n\left(X_{is}-X_{io}\right)}\times 100$ (1)

Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)

The value of RMSE given by Equation (2) is always positive and is zero in the ideal case. The RMSE gives information on the short-term performance of the correlations by allowing a term-by-term comparison of the deviation between the simulated and observed values. The smaller the value, the better the model’s performance is [18] .

$\text{RMSE}={\left[\frac{1}{n}{\displaystyle \sum _1^n{\left(X_{is}-X_{io}\right)}^2}\right]}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ (2)

The correlation coefficient (R²)

In statistics literature, it is the proportion of variability in a data set that is accounted for by a statistical model, where the variability is measured quantitatively as the sum of square deviations. A high value of R² is desirable as this shows a lower unexplained variation. R² is a statistic that gives some information about the goodness-of-fit of a model. In regression, the R² coefficient of determination is a statistical measure of how well the regression line approximates the real data points. An R² of 1.0 indicates that the regression line perfectly fits the data, which is never valid in any climatic parameters estimation model [18] .

The relative error (E)

The relative error (EP and ET), respectively for precipitations and temperature of the estimated values of the rainfall or temperature (minimum or maximum) may be calculated from the following:

$\text{EP}=\frac{X_o-X_s}{X_o}$ (4)

$\text{ET}=X_o-X_s$ (5)

Volume bias (VB)

Volume bias (VB) which indicates over and underestimations is representing by equation:

$\text{VB}=\frac{{\displaystyle \sum _{t=1}^n\left(\text{RCMs}-\text{OBS}\right)}}{{\displaystyle \sum _{t=1}^n\left(\text{OBS}\right)}}$ (6)

RCMs and OBS designed the values of observed and simulated data for validation period (1999-2008).

The t-Test statistic (t)

The tests for mean values, the random variable t with n − 1 degrees of freedom may be written here as follows. The smaller values of t-statistic the better the performance of modeling.

$t={\left[\frac{\left(n-1\right){\left(\text{MBE}\right)}^2}{{\left(\text{RMSE}\right)}^2}-{\left(\text{MBE}\right)}^2\right]}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ (7)

Mann-Kendall Trend Test:

Many techniques can be used for analyzing the series trends, yet the most commonly used technique by meteorologists is the Mann-Kendall (MK) test [19] - [24] . There are two advantages of using this test. The Mann-Kendall test is non-parametric, does not require normally distributed data, and has a low sensitivity to missing data [20] . This method has also an advantage to have a low sensitivity to abrupt breaks due to inhomogeneous time series [21] [24] . Null hypothesis H0 means that no trend changes in series data have been found (the data are independent and randomly ordered), and H0 is tested against the alternative hypothesis H1, which assumes a trend exists. The Mann-Kendall statistics are calculated as follow:

$S={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n-1}{\displaystyle \sum _{j=i+1}^n\mathrm{sgn}\left(X_j-X_i\right)}}$ (8)

Positive S value indicates an increasing trend and negative value indicates a decreasing trend in the data series. The sign function is given as:

$\mathrm{sgn}\left(X_j-X_i\right)=\{\begin{array}{l}1\text{if}{X}_j-X_i>0\\ 0\text{if}{X}_j-X_i=0\\ -1\text{if}{X}_j-X_i<0\end{array}$ (9)

In cases where the sample size n > 10, the statistics S is approximately standard normal distribution with the mean zero and variance is denoted by the following:

$VAR\left(S\right)=\frac{n\left(n-1\right)\left(2n+5\right)-{\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^m{t}_i\left(t_i-1\right)\left(2t_i+5\right)}}{18}$ (10)

where n is the number of data points; t_i are the ties of the sample time series; and m is the number of tied values (a tied group is a set of sample data having the same value). Then Equations (8) and (10) were used to compute the test statistic Z from the following Equation (11):

$Z=\{\begin{array}{l}\frac{S-1}{\sqrt{VAR\left(S\right)}}\text{if}S>0\\ 0\text{if}S=0\\ \frac{S+1}{\sqrt{VAR\left(S\right)}}\text{if}S<0\end{array}$ (11)

A positive value of Z indicates an upward trend; a negative value indicates a downward trend, and a zero value indicates no trend.

Sen’s slope estimator and relative percentage change (RPC):

β which is Sen’s slope estimator, sign reflects data trend reflection, while its value indicates the steepness of the trends (Equation (12)):

$\beta =\text{Median}\left(\frac{x_j-x_k}{j-k}\right)$ (12)

Equation bellow (13) was used to compute the relative percentage change (RPC) of the annual as well as monthly rainfall:

$\text{RCP}=\left(\frac{n\beta }{Xmean}\right)\ast 100$ (13)

where n is the length of the trend period; β is the magnitude of the trend slope of the time series determined by the Theil-Sen median estimator; and X is the absolute average value of the time series. This method was used in a similar study by Tabari et al. (2013) [25] and Somée et al. (2013) [26] .

Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI)

In order to study monthly and annual variability of rainfall in the study area of each weather station, a Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI) was used. The guidelines for interpretation of PCI are presented in Table 2. The PCI was designed as an indicator of rainfall concentration over specified time scales. For the purpose of this study, the PCI is calculated on an annual scale for each station. This index is described as:

$\text{PCI}=\left[\frac{\left({\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{12}{P}_i{}^2}\right)}{{\left({\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{12}{P}_i}\right)}^2}\right]\ast 100$ (14)

where P_i is the monthly precipitation in month i. An interpretation of the PCI classification as suggested by Oliver (1980) is represented in Table 2. Recently, many researchers [27] [28] [29] have adopted this method. In addition to the above, the frequency count of PCI classes in each station is carried out.

Changes in precipitation from the reference period:

Finally, the changes from the reference period are assessed as shown by Equation (15) for precipitations:

$I_p=\left(\frac{\text{FF}-\text{HIST}}{\text{HIST}}\right)\times 100$ (15)

where FF and HIST represent respectively the mean for the far future (2061-2090 and 2071-2100) and the historical or reference period (1981-2010) [11] .

The seasonal averages as well as the annual averages were calculated using the Climate Data Operator Commands and the free software R is used to compute all the statistical parameters and the plots presented in the following [11] [12] .

3. Results

This section is divided into two main parts. The first part focuses on statistical tests of the performance of the eight models used. The second part analyses the results of the seasonal and annual distribution of rainfall, changes and trends in rainfall over Mono basin in Togo.

3.1. Statistical Tests

Summarized values of statistical parameters over the period 1999-2008 are given by Table 3. From this table, we analyze the model with the most accurate performance to estimate rainfall by assessing overall performances using MBE, RMSE, MPE, R², t-test and VB. The MBE between RCMs simulations and observations are from −18.75% to 6.72% for precipitation. The largest MBE is observed with models MIROC5 (mean value −18.75) and the smallest MBE is given by the multi-models’ mean (Model-Mean) where the value is −2.33. With regards to RMSE, the models MIROC5, GFDL-ESM2M and MPI-ESM-LR exhibited the largest biases for precipitation. On the other hand, the highest values of R² for rainfall are presented by the models EC-EARTH, IPSL-CMA5-MR, NorESM1-M and Model-Mean with 0.863, 0.899, 0.921 and 0.952, respectively. Among the four latter models, the t-test lowest value is given by the Model-Mean (1.87 mean value) followed by IPSL-CMA5-MR, NorESM1-M and EC-EARTH, respectively. However, the model EC-EARTH was excluded because of the t-test value was high (4.35 mean value). Therefore, the three models can be considered as the best to estimate rainfall. Table 3 revealed that the computed volume biases values are between −13.33% and 15.01%. In fact, the highest biases recorded may be attributed to errors in the observed data and errors associated with the model. Furthermore, the Monthly relative percentage error (E) summarized in Table 4 was calculated for each model to provide information on the model performance, and is thus stringent test of model

performance. In fact, the (E) between RCMs simulations and observations varies between −15% and 37% for precipitation. We notice from the above discussion that the models are performed differently for different months. Some models performed well, while others performed poorly, and vice versa. This is explained by compensation or cancellation of the biases between the different RCMs.

In the next section the multi-models mean only will be considered. To bias-correct the model future projection, the cumulative distribution function matching (CD FM) of the model in the reference period is used to identify the corresponding percentile values of the future period [10] .

3.2. Variability, Changes and Trends in Rainfall

Seasonal Changes of Rainfall

Seasonal variations were investigated to provide more detail about the changes in climatological monthly precipitation, averaged across Mono basin using the multi-models mean. The analysis of the results obtained by the rainfall changes is presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The evolution of the monthly average rainfall amounts will be broadly characterized by a decrease and increase between the 1981-2010 reference period and the far future (2061-2090 and 2071-2100). In the rainy season (May to August), all the stations selected in the basin show a decrease in fluviometric heights, in general. This indicates that Mono Basin will be characterized by late rains in the future. In any time, slices,

results from the multi-models mean suggest a decrease in precipitation in general, with no significant differences between the stations and the horizons considered. Thus, the magnitude of the decrease peaks in rainy season (April to October), with the smallest increase in dry season (November to March).

Future Annual and seasonal rainfall patterns

This section analyzes future annual and seasonal rainfall patterns. According to the rainfall data analysis, the long-term mean annual rainfall from 2061 to 2100 in the region is 1784.3 mm. However, as shown in Table 5, the mean annual rainfall ranges from 1018 to 1924 mm. The lowest rainfall (1018.02) was observed in the northern part of the basin (Tchamba) and the highest rainfall (1923.54) was recorded in the southwest of basin (Atakpamé), with a coefficient of variation of 0.48 and 0.19, respectively.

The PCI is computed and presented in the same Table 5 for the seasonal and annual distribution of rainfall at the stations. This Table depicts the values of PCI across the study area. The PCI values for the stations in the climate subequatorial (Anié, Atakpamé and Tabligbo) range between 11.53 and 33.52, signifying a range between a uniform precipitation distribution, a moderate

^aUniform distribution, ^bModerate distribution, ^cIrregular distribution, ^dStrong irregular distribution. ¹and ²represent Annual and seasonal mean rainfall, respectively.

precipitation distribution and a strongly irregular distribution. The highest values of PCI were recorded at the Tabligbo rain gauge station. The PCI values for humid tropical climate stations (Sokodé, Sotouboua and Tchamba) were in the same range (between 16.36 and 59.34) in the climate subequatorial but with a predominant occurrence of irregular and strongly irregular distributions. The highest values of PCI were recorded at the Soutouboua and Tchamba rain gauge stations. As would be expected, these two stations are on the northwestern and northeastern flank of the study area where the mean annual total rainfall is lowest in Togo.

Rainfall Trend Analysis

The result of the MK test was applied to analyze the future mean annual and seasonal rainfall trend for the period of 2061-2100 for six stations in the Mono basin in Togo. Similarly, Sen’s slope and percentage change were used to examine the magnitude and change of the future variables. The results of the MK trend, Sen’s slope and percentage change of rainfall are given in Table 6. The annual and seasonal trend and the changes rate vary widely from place to place. The trend indicates the mean annual and seasonal rainfall increase (positive trend), reduction (negative trend), and no trend for the stations considered in the basin. Accordingly, annual rainfall shows a decreasing trend in 67% of the stations. Out of these stations, only four have a significant level (5%). From these, a decreasing trend has been observed to be significant at Sotouboua (6.09 mm/year), Sokodé (9.32 mm/year) and Tchamba (4.8 mm/year) with a percentage change of 17.7%, 30.23% and 12.3%, respectively. Station Tabligbo shows a significant decreasing trend at 7.18 mm/year, with a percentage change of 18.76%. However, a no significant increasing trend in the mean annual rainfall was observed at Atakpamé (2.2 mm/year) with a percentage change of 8.45%. Station Anié shows a no significant decreasing trend at 0.45 mm/year, with a percentage change of 2.85%. Much of the decreasing trend in rainfall is due to a decrease monthly-averaged rainfall [10] . Accordingly, mensural rainfall a significant decreasing trend is also observed in Tabligbo (0.43 mm/year) and Sokodé

^aand % Δ denote significant level at 5%, and percentage change, respectively. ¹and ²denote Annual and Seasonal mean rainfall, respectively.

(0.89 mm/year) with percentage changes of 18.67 and 67.8, respectively (Table 6). On the other hand, stations in Anié and Sotouboua show a statistically insignificant decreasing rainfall trend with a percentage change of 32.6% and 22.35%, respectively during this season. Station Atakpamé shows a no-significant increasing trend at 0.4 mm/year, with a percentage change of 37%.

4. Discussions

We notice from the above discussion that the models are performed differently for different months. Some models performed well, while others performed poorly, and vice versa. This is explained by compensation or cancellation of the biases between the different RCMs. However, the analysis herein highlighted the multi-models’ mean ability to simulate the Mono river basin rainfall adequately and therefore can be used for assessment of future climate projections for this region. To have better comprehension of results of in this paper it is important to look at the results of other regions and countries. The disparity observed in the evolution of precipitation could be due to the type of forcing models or the convection pattern used in West Africa [15] . This divergence of models on climate projections on precipitation in West Africa is still uncertain [30] . The inconsistent trends and changes of rainfall noticed are likely linked to the high heterogeneousness types seasons. Indeed, the Mono basin is characterized by two types of rainfall regime. In southern basin, there are two rainy seasons which extend from mid-March to mid-July and from mid-August to October. In northern basin, there is one rainy season which extends from April to October.

In this study, the precipitation decreases projected by the average multi-models are consistent with other studies in West Africa: Kouakou et al. [31] applied the RegCM3 regional climate model driven by the ECHAM5 model to simulate temperatures and precipitation over Ivory-Coast. The results of this simulation predicted a decrease in average annual rainfall in the 21st century. Kouakou et al. [31] estimated the decrease in precipitation on the Western Sahel to about −12.6% by 2091-2100. Diallo et al. [32] showed that the decrease in mean rainfall in this area of West Africa could probably be induced in part by a weakening of the moisture from local sources, slowing down the hydrological cycle. Tall et al. [33] , found a strong decrease in precipitation by 2100 under the RCP8.5 scenario. Thus, the results of this investigation showed that the long term mensural precipitation of study area in general has decrease. These results are in line with Dosio and Panitz [34] using the regional climate model CCLM, have predicted a significant reduction of precipitation at the end of the century in West Africa. It is also in line with the recent special IPCC report which states that West Africa will likely experience longer and more intense droughts in the near future [1] [2] .

However, we note that the divergence of climate change patterns is still uncertain over the world. Some climate projections suggest an increase in the rainfall and others indicate a decrease. Significant positive trends have been observed in the USA [35] East and Northeast Australia [36] , Chinas coastal area [37] , India [38] , eastern and western Indochina Peninsula [39] .

The results indicate that the rainfall coefficient of variability is high in the area with low annual rainfall. This is supported by Birara et al. 2018 [21] , whose study confirms the relationship between the area with low annual rainfall and high variability of rainfall. For example, we have noted that, Atakpamé located near the mountainous area in the region receive higher amounts of rainfall as compared with the stations at lower elevations. A similar study by Haile et al. (2009) [17] on rainfall variability in the Blue Nile region concludes that the probability of rainfall occurrence is high at stations in mountainous areas compared with stations located at lower elevations.

In RCP8.5 context, the agricultural sector, main economic activity in Mono basin watershed would be affected. Furthermore, a significant decrease in water availability (surface water and groundwater) due to a decrease in rainfall showed by [30] will exacerbate following the scenario RCP8.5. The reduction of inflow will affect economic activities in basin. The river discharges are the most important component of hydrological cycle for water planning and management in Mono basin [40] . Indeed, due to financial and technological constraints hindering a satisfactory development, and exploration of groundwater and reservoir resources in Mono basin, river water is the most accessible water for many uses such as irrigation, livestock watering, washing, energy. So all these activities will be affected.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, the study analyzed the performance of a set of regional climate models. Some models performed well, while others performed poorly, and vice versa. This is explained by compensation or cancellation of the biases between the different RCMs. The PCI, Mann-Kendall trend test, Theil-Sen slope estimator and RPCs were calculated to investigate trends and changes in rainfall over Mono basin in Togo at annual, seasonal, and monthly time scales for the 1981-2010 and 2061-2100 periods.

Stations in the south have moderate, irregular, and strongly irregular rainfall concentrations, whereas stations in the North of basin have irregular and strongly irregular rainfall concentrations. In addition, annual and the monthly Mann Kendall trends indicate that both significant and insignificant negative and positive changes in rainfall have occurred across the Mono basin in Togo. With regard to the changes of the seasons, a decrease is found for the precipitations in general. In addition, it indicates that Mono Basin will be characterized by late rains in the future. It is understood that future changes in rainfall distribution and trends will affect the availability of water for crops, which should affect the productivity of rain fed agriculture. In short, further work is needed in order to improve the future impact assessments of the climate change on water resources and on some human activities such as agriculture, energy, fisheries and breeding.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lamboni, B., Emmanuel, L.A., Manirakiza, C. and Djibib, Z.M. (2019) Variability of Future Rainfall over the Mono River Basin of West-Africa. American Journal of Climate Change, 8, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.81008

References