International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application
Vol.3 No.3(2014), Article ID:48633,8 pages DOI:10.4236/ijmnta.2014.33015

On Slide Mode Control of Chaotic Rikitake Two-Disk Dynamo

—Chaotic Simulations of the Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field

School of Natural Resources Engineering, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan

Email: aharb48@gmail.com   Received 5 June 2014; revised 3 July 2014; accepted 11 July 2014

ABSTRACT

The modern nonlinear theory, bifurcation and chaos theory are used in this paper to analyze the dynamics of the Rikitake two-disk dynamo system. The mathematical model of the Rikitake system consists of three nonlinear differential equations, which found to be the same as the mathematical model of the well-known Lorenz system. The study showed that under certain value of control parameter, the system experiences a chaotic behaviour. The experienced chaotic oscillation may simulate the reversal of the Earth’s magnetic field. The main objective of this paper is to control the chaotic behaviour in Rikitake system. So, a nonlinear controller based on the slide mode control theory is designed. The study showed that the designed controller was so effective in controlling the unstable chaotic oscillations.

Keywords:Chaos Theory, Nonlinear Control, Magnetic Theory, Sliding-Mode Control Theory 1. Introduction

Figure 1   shows the Rikitake two-disk dynamo. As shown in Figure 1, two conducting disks, (Left) and (Right) are subjected to a common torque of magnitude G. Disks and rotate in the same sense. Disk has an angular velocity, , around the axis of rotation and has an angular velocity, , around the axis of rotation . Current loop is coaxial with disk with axis and is below , while current loop is coaxial with disk with axis and is above . Currents and both run upwards in the axial wires and respectively. From the configuration of Figure 1 we see that current runs radially outward in Disk while current runs radially inward in Disk . Loop is connected to Disk and its axis of rotation by conducting brushes, similarly loop is connected to Figure 1. Rikitake two-disk dynamo   .

Disk and its axis of rotation by conducting brushes. Current loop causes a magnetic field to pierce through the rotating disk , and current loop causes a magnetic field to pierce through the rotating disk . According to Faraday’s law and Lenz’s law magnetic field crossing disk induces an emf between the center of and its rim causing an induced inward current to occur in the opposite direction to which reduces the original current . A similar situation happens in disk and magnetic field , but of opposite polarity to that of and , where the induced emf is also between the center of and its rim causing an induced outward current to occur in the opposite direction to which reduces the original current . This process will result in electric current reversals in both loops which causes a reversal in the corresponding magnetic fields. Chaos shall result under particular initial conditions.

The dynamics of Rikitake system has been discussed by many researchers. E. C. Bullard  - has extensively discussed the behavior of earth’s magnetic field and its simulation with dynamos. He first discussed the magnetic field within the earth  , then the similar behavior between a set of homogeneous dynamos and terrestrial magnetism  and in 1955  discussed the stability of a homopolar dynamo. Liu Xiao-Jun, et al.  analyzed the dynamics of Rikitake two-disk dynamo to explain the reversals of the Earth’s magnetic field. They concluded that the chaotic behavior of the system can be used to simulate the reversals of the geomagnetic field. The Rikitake chaotic attractor was studied by several authors. T. McMillen  has studied the shape and dynamics of the Rikitake attractor. J. Llibre et al.  used the Poincare compactification to study the dynamics of the Rikitake system at infinity. Chien-Chih Chen et al.  have studied the stochastic resonance in the periodically forced Rikitake dynamo.

Many researchers start working on controlling the chaotic behaviors. Harb and Ayoub  have designed a nonlinear controller based on backstepping nonlinear theory to control the chaotic behaviour in Rikitake system. Harb and Harb  have designed a nonlinear controller to control the chaotic behavior in the phase-locked loop by means of nonlinear control. Harb and Abdel-Jabber  used both linear and nonlinear control to mitigate the chaotic oscillations in electrical power system. Nayfeh et al.  , Chiang et al.  and Abed et al.  have controlled the chaotic oscillations in power systems using nonlinear control. Chang and Chen  investigated bifurcation characteristics of nonlinear systems under a PID controller. The main objective of control is to stabilize and delay a chaotic oscillation and reduce the amplitude of bifurcation solution. In  , they used a control law to transform an unstable subcritical bifurcation point into a stable supercritical bifurcation point.

Lately, the control aspect of the Rikitake chaotic attractor was studied through self coupling of single state variable and nonlinear feedback controller with partial systems states  .

In this paper, we used the nonlinear control based on slide mode control to control the chaotic oscillations of the Rikitake two-disk dynamo.

2. Mathematical Model

As shown in Figure 1, the Rikitake two-disk system consists of two conducting rotating disks. These disks are connected into two coils. The current in each coil feeds the magnetic field of the other. The self inductance and resistance are the same in each circuit. An external constant mechanical torque for each circuit is applied on the axis to rotate with an angular velocity. The circuit equations as shown in Figure 1 are given as: (1) (2)

where and are the rotation voltages and . is the mutual inductance.

If the moment of inertia of each disk, is considered, the system mathematical model can be written after  as follows: (3) (4) (5)

where and .

3. Uncontrolled System

Simulation Results and Discussion

The equilibrium solution or constant solution of the system can be found if we let the set of Equations (3)-(5) to be zero. One will end up with a set of nonlinear algebraic equations. One of the solutions of this set of equations willbe function of one of the control parameters. The stability of this constant solution, can be studied by using eigenvalue analysis which is based on the Jacobian matrix derived based on linearization. The eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix of the set of Equations (3)-(5) evaluated at the equilibrium point. In this paper, we used our own program for calculating and analyzing the stability of the fixed points and their bifurcations rather than using software packages in the market.

On the other hand, the stability of the periodic solution is studied by means of the Floquet theory. At the value of the control parameter , we found that the system is experiencing chaotic oscillations as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. In this paper, the main objective is to find a way to eliminate the chaotic oscillations. So, a nonlinear controller based on backstepping nonlinear theory control is designed. In the next section, the nonlinear controller design will be discussed.

4. Controlled System

4.1. Slide Mode Nonlinear Controller

Sliding mode control (SMC) is a variable structure control utilizing a high-speed switching control law to drive a system state trajectory onto a specified and user chosen surface, so called sliding surface, and to maintain the Figure 2. Time history (chaotic behavior, without controller). Figure 3. State space trajectory projection (chaotic behavior, without controller).

system state trajectory on the sliding surface at subsequent times. Many researchers have been used such a controller, for example; Korondi et al.  , Hung et al.  , Slotine and Sastry  , and Slotine and Li  .

To this end, let us rewrite the Equations (3)-(5) as follows: (6) (7) (8)

where , is the control signal need to be designed.

The two separate phases of the sliding mode design method are:

Phase 1:

Sliding-surface design: an appropriate sliding surface must be selected to yield desirable performance. (9)

where is Tuning parameter.

Phase 2:

Sliding-reachability condition design (10)

where and are positive constant design parameters.

4.2. Construction of the Control Law

By differentiating the sliding surface and equating with the reachability condition and solving out for , the control signal will be: (11)

4.3. Simulation Results and Discussion

As mentioned previously, the Rikitake system is experiencing a chaotic behavior as shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, and this was when no control signal added to the system. But once we add the designed control signal in Equation (11) to the mathematical model of the Rikitake system Equations (6)-(8), one can see that all the chaotic oscillations, shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, have been eliminated as shown in Figures 4-7. Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the time history of the system when the designed controller , is applied after 50 sec. One can see how effective the controller in eliminating the chaotic oscillations. Figure 4. Time history (with controller). Figure 5. State space trajectory projection (with controller). Figure 6. State space trajectory projection (with controller).

5. Conclusion

Bifurcation and chaos theory was used to investigate dynamics of the Rikitake two-disk dynamo. Rikitake system mathematical model consists of three nonlinear differential equations, which found to be the same as the mathematical model of the well known Lorenz system. This system is experiencing a chaotic behavior at certain value of the control parameter. The experienced chaotic oscillation can simulate the reversal of the Earth magnetic field. To control chaotic behavior, a nonlinear controller based on the slide mode control theory was Figure 7. Comparison of state space trajectory projection between two cases (with and without controller, and the controller applied after 50 sec).

designed. The study showed that the designed controller was so effective to eliminate the unstable chaotic oscillations of the Rikitake two-disk dynamo.

References

1. Rikitake, T. (1958) Oscillations of a System of Disk Dynamos. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 54, 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100033223
2. http://oen.dydaktyka.agh.edu.pl/dydaktyka/matematyka/c_fraktale_i_chaos/chaos.php?rozdzial=8
3. Danca, M.-F. and Codreanu, S. (2011) Finding the Rikitake’s Attractors by Parameter Switching. arXiv:1102.2164v1
4. Danca, M.-F. and Codreanu, S. (2012) Modeling Numerically the Rikitake’s Attractors. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 349, 861-878.
5. Bullard, E.C. (1949) The Magnetic Field within the Earth. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 197, 433-453.http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1949.0074
6. Bullard, E.C. and Gellman, H. (1954) Homogeneous Dynamos and Terrestrial Magnetism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 247, 213-278.
7. Bullard, E.C. (1955) The Stability of a Homopolar Dynamo. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 51, 744-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100030814
8. Liu, X.-J., Li, X.-F., Chang, Y.-X. and Zhang, J.-G. (2008) Chaos and Chaos Synchronism of the Rikitake Two-Disk Dynamo. 4th International Conference on Natural Computation, IEEE Computer Society, Jinan, 18-20 October 2008, 613-617.
9. McMillen, T. (1999) The Shape and Dynamics of the Rikitake Attractor. The Nonlinear Journal, 1, 1-10.
10. Llibre, J. and Messias, M. (2009) Global Dynamics of the Rikitake System. Physica D, 238, 241-252.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2008.10.011
11. Chen, C.-C. and Tseng, C.-Y. (2007) A Study of Stochastic Resonance in the Periodically Forced Rikitake Dynamo. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 18, 671-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2007.18.4.671(T)
12. Harb, A. and Ayoub, N. (2010) Nonlinear Control of Chaotic Rikitake Two-Disk Dynamo. International Journal of Nonlinear Science, 9, 1-8.
13. Harb, A. and Harb, B. (2004) Chaos Control of Third-Order Phase-Locked Loops Using Backstepping Nonlinear Controller. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 20, 719-723.
14. Harb, A. and Abedl-Jabbar, N. (2003) Controlling Hopf Bifurcation and Chaos in a Small Power System. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 18, 1055-1063.
15. Nayfeh, A.H., Harb, A.M. and Chin, C. (1996) Bifurcation in a Power System Model. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 6.
16. Abed, E.H., Alexander, J.C., Wang, H., Hamdan, A.H. and Lee, H.C. (1992) Dynamic Bifurcation in a Power System Model Exhibiting Voltage Collapse. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, San Diego, 10-13 May 1992, 2509-2512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.1992.230476
17. Chiang, H.-D., Dobson, I., Thomas, R.J., Thorp, J.S. and Fekih-Ahmed, L. (1990) On Voltage Collapse in Electric Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5, 601-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.54571
18. Chang, H.-C. and Chen, L.-H. (1984) Bifurcation Characteristics of Nonlinear Systems under Conventional PID Control. Chemical Engineering Science, 39, 1127-1142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(84)85075-7
19. Abed, E.H. and Fu, J.-H. (1986) Local Feedback Stabilization and Bifurcation Control, I. Hopf Bifurcation. Systems Control Letters, 7, 11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(86)90095-2
20. Jian, J., Shen, Y. and Yu, H. (2008) Synchronization of Rikitake Chaotic Attractor via Partial System States. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, Hunan, 18-21 November 2008, 2919-2924.
21. Korondi, P., Hashimoto, H. and Utkin, V. (1994) Proceedings of the Asian Control Conference, 381 Lee, S. 1995.
22. Hung, J.Y., Gao, W. and Hung, J.C. (1993) Variable Structure Control: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 40, 2-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/41.184817
23. Slotine, J.-J.E. and Sastry, S.S. (1983) Tracking Control of Non-Linear Systems Using Sliding Surfaces, with Application to Robot Manipulators. International Journal of Control, 38, 465-492.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207178308933088
24. Slotine, J.-J.E. and Li, W. (1991) Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.