 Materials Sciences and Applicatio ns, 2011, 2, 1407-1415 doi:10.4236/msa.2011.210190 Published Online October 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/msa) Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA 1 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review Ibram Ganesh Centre for Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Cells and Advanced Ceramics, International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metal- lurgy and New Materials (ARCI), Hyderabad, India. Email: ibram_ganesh@yahoo.com Received February 3rd, 2011; revised March 23rd, 2011; accepted April 2nd, 2011. ABSTRACT This article presents a meticu lous and comprehensive review of literature reported on conversion of carbon dio xide, a green house gas into methanol or to any other value added chemical following various routes including catalytic, ther- mal, biological, electrochemical and photoelectrochemical (PEC). More emphasis is given on conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol using solar energy (i.e., artificial photosynthesis) as this process can tackle the human generated two pressing problems, i.e., “global warming” and “energy crisis” today world is facing. It also covers information on various materials required for designing and development of reliable PEC cells for conversion of carbon dioxide to more value added chemicals including methanol. Finally, it also provides the scope for the future research on this topic with adequate literature support. Keywords: Solar Energy, Carbon Dioxide, Methanol, Photoelectrochemical Cells 1. Introduction Recently, the selective catalytic reduction of carbon di- oxide (CO2) to value added chemicals using solar energy has received a great deal of attention from the scientific community as it can in deed solve two major problems, i.e., “Global Warming” [1-4] and “Energy Crisis” [5-9] today world is facing. Atmospheric CO2 resulting from burning of fossil fuels to meet energy needs of human beings is mainly responsible for global warming that is posing severe problems to both ecology and human be- ings. Recently, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has also concluded that the increasing CO2 concentrations resulting from fossil fuel burning and deforestation are responsible for most of the observed global warming [2]. Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol [3] of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions [4]. On the other hand, today 90% of the world’s primary energy requirement is met by fossil fuels and for at least next few decades these fossil fuels are going to be the only energy resources as alternative reliable renewable energy resources are yet to be fully realized. The world reserve of natural gas is estimated as about 1014 m 3; this has a significant impact on the world’s energy balance. As per an estimation, at the current rate of use, these reserves will last for 60 years, compared with 30 years for crude oil reserves [1-4]. On the other hand, self sufficiency in energy is a stated national goal for all the countries. Most of the proposed means to achieve this goal are either en- vironmentally unacceptable or are not feasible, especially those not depending on fossil fuel resources [10-20]. Of the available alternatives, solar energy is the most abun- dant, inexhaustible single resource available. Solar en- ergy as available on the surface of the earth constitutes clean, non-polluting, abundant and relatively “free” re- source. As much solar energy falls on earth’s surface in a fortnight as the energy contained in the world’s fossil fuel resources (1016 kW). The mean solar irradiance at normal incidence outside the atmosphere is 1360 W/m2 and the total annual incidence of solar energy in India alone is about 107 kW and for the southern region the daily average is about 0.4 kW/m2 [11]. However, captur- ing and utilizing solar energy is not simple. Methods are being sought to convert solar energy into a concentrated, storable form of energy. Nature via photosynthesis con- verts somewhat less than 1% of the sun’s energy at the earth’s surface to a solid fuel, i.e., plant materials, which when accumulated and transformed over geologic ages
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review 1408 yielded fossil fuels. Current rates of use of these fossil fuels, and the particular geographic distribution and po- litical control of major petroleum resources pose prob- lems for nations that are net petroleum consumers [5-9]. Hence, an alternative method yielding a simple fuel, at a higher conversion, has long been desired. The conversion of CO2 into more useful organic fuels (like methanol) using energy that is not produced from fossil fuels is be- lieved to be one such alternative method. It is also strongly believed that the artificial photosynthesis has tremendous potential, even though it remains to be suc- cessfully demonstrated on a commercial basis. It is a scientific challenge, and if this process is successful, the market will be gigantic. Considering the importance of solar assisted conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol from the point of view of global warming and energy crisis, the complete literature available on this topic has been reviewed and presented in this article along with the merits and demerits associated with each reported process. 2. Methods Available for Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Value Added Chemicals Methanol is the most promising photo-reduced product of carbon dioxide because it can be transformed into other useful chemicals such as gasoline (petrol) using conventional chemical technologies, or easily transported and used as fuel in the automobile vehicles without major adjustments [21-28]. There are several other motivations as listed below for producing methanol or any other use- ful chemical from carbon dioxide [29-35]. 1) Carbon dioxide is an inexpensive, nontoxic feedstock that can frequently replace toxic chemicals such as phosgene of isocyanates. 2) Carbon dioxide is a renewable feedstock compared to oil or coal. 3) The production of chemicals from carbon dioxide can lead to new industrial produc- tivity. 4) New routes to existing chemical intermediates and products could be more efficient and economical than current methods. 5) The production of chemicals from carbon dioxide could have a small but significant impact on the global carbon balance. Considering these benefits, several technologies have been proposed for utilization of carbon dioxide and for improving the effi- ciency of energy conversion. The most successful reac- tion of these types is the Sabatier process [36]. This pro- cess involves the reaction of hydrogen with carbon diox- ide at elevated temperatures and pressures in the pres- ence of a nickel catalyst to produce methane and water (CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O). It was discovered by the French chemist Paul Sabatier. It has been proposed as a key step in reducing the cost of manned exploration of Mars (Mars Direct) through in-situ resource utilization. After producing water by combining hydrogen trans- ported from Earth and carbon dioxide taken from the atmosphere of Mars, oxygen would be extracted from the water by electrolysis and used as a rocket propellant. The stoichiometric propulsion fuel mix ratio is 1:8 between hydrogen and oxygen by weight (each pound of hydro- gen requires 8 pound of oxygen to burn), and if only the light hydrogen has to be transported, and the heavy oxy- gen extracted locally, that would result in a very consid- erable weight savings which would have to be trans- ported to Mars. Nevertheless, the expensive electrolysis technique employed in the Sabatier process for splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen is not economical to practice for vehicles those run on the road. On the other hand, electrochemical systems developed for reducing CO2 to methanol or methane involve high electrode over-potentials, which offer little or no advan- tage since the quantity of fuel consumed during the syn- thesis of the reduction products far exceeds the fuel value of the products [34-36]. Whereas, the catalytic hydro- genation of CO2 to methanol has also been found to be not encouraging due to the involvement of high reaction temperatures [34]. Even, the electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid or carbon monoxide at Pd, Pt and Hg electrodes were also found to be not commer- cially viable [37-39]. The production cost of processes involving reduction of CO2 to methanol such as, high temperature catalytic-vapour phase reaction of CO2 with water vapour, thermo-chemical/electro-chemical reduction of CO2, etc., has been found to be not economical [10]. The main reason for un-economical production of me- thanol or any other useful chemical from CO2 is the en- dothermic nature of these reactions (for example, CO2(g) + 2H2O(l) CH3OH(l) + 3/2O2(g); Ho – 727 kJ·mol–1 and Go – 703 kJ·mol–1). Given the CO2 reduction process is thermodynami- cally uphill (CO2 + 6H+ + 6e– CH3OH + H2O; E˚ = –0.38 V), economical reduction of CO2 to value added chemicals is possible only if renewable energy, such as solar energy, is used as the energy source. In fact, plant photosynthesis has long been studied with an eye to un- derstanding its underlying mechanisms and then applying this knowledge to the production of energy for the needs of society [40]. Solar energy can be harnessed to drive CO2 conversion by: 1) artificial photosynthesis using ho- mogeneous and heterogeneous systems; 2) electroche- mical reduction using solar electric power; and 3) hy- drogenation of CO2 using solar-produced hydrogen, i.e., using photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells. Though, these routes exhibited ability to convert CO2 to CH3OH, HCOOH, HCHO, CH3OCH3, CO, etc., they suffered from several limitations such as, poor performance, un-sta- bility of associated catalysts and semi-conductors in wa- ter, in-efficiency of electrolytic systems, inferior reduc- Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review1409 ing cathode materials, etc. Nevertheless, photoelectro- chemical (PEC) conversion of CO2 to methanol appears to be more promising among various other routes [41]. 3. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Cells In a study, Halmon [10] demonstrated that aqueous car- bon dioxide could be reduced on semiconductor surfaces such as p-type gallium phosphide to produce formic acid, formaldehyde and methanol in a photo-assisted electro- lytic reaction using photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells. In fact, PEC conversion of visible light to chemical or elec- trical energy has the potential of being a relatively effi- cient process. PEC cells enable solar energy utilization to meet many of the energy needs of the future [42-58]. These cells involve the application of liquid-junction transducers to solar energy conversion. Semiconductor- electrolyte junction devices of these cells have an advan- tage over solid state photo-voltaics in that 1) they can directly generate hydrogen or carry out other photo-redox processes, and 2) they can use polycrystalline semicon- ductor electrodes. The junction is easily prepared merely by dipping the electrode in the electrolyte, in contrast to solid state junctions which have to be prepared by diffu- sion or ion implantation. However, the efficiency of so far studied PEC cells was found to be low and the semi- conductor photoelectrodes employed exhibited poor sta- bility against water reaction under solar irradiation. Photoelectrolysis of water or reduction of CO2 require thermodynamic energy inputs of 1.23 and 1.5 eV, re- spectively. Greater energy input is required to make up for losses due to band bending (necessary in order to separate charge at the semiconductor surface), resistance losses, and overvoltage potentials [42-58]. Furthermore, when a semiconductor is placed in an electrolyte, partial differences between the two phases result in charging of the interface, as in a capacitor. This charging results in a perturbation of the energy levels of the semiconductor called “band-bending”. Band-bending is responsible for separation of electron-hole pairs in photoelectrochemical processes. Recombination and corrosion processes de- crease the utilization of the electron-hole pairs generated on illumination. Photoelectrolysis of water at high effi- ciency is also hampered by a number of problems. First, the overvoltages of the hydrogen and oxygen couples at most moderate band gap (1.0 < Eg < 2.0 eV) semicon- ductors are substantial. Second, if electron or hole trans- fer to the substrate does not occur rapidly, recombination of electron-hole pairs can occur at surface defects or grain boundaries in polycrystalline samples [42-58]. These two problems arise, at least in part, from one fundamental deficiency. While the electrolyte-semicon- ductor interface has excellent characteristics for separa- tion of charge and generation of high oxidation or reduc- tion potentials when irradiated, it often has very poor catalytic properties for reactions with significant activa- tion energies. Water is particularly an attractive source of hydrogen for the reduction of CO2 as well as for the di- rect generation of H2. Water can only be used, however, if the semiconductor electrodes are stable in its presence. It has been demonstrated that, the production of en- ergy-rich materials (e.g., H2, CH3OH, CH2O, CH2O2, and NH3) is associated with O2 evolution [42-58]. A major problem in photoelectrochemistry is that the oxidation of water at the photoanode of non-oxide n-type materials is thermodynamically and kinetically disfavoured over the reaction of the valence band holes with the semiconduc- tor lattice. In fact, all known non-oxide and many oxide n-type photoanodes are susceptible to photodegradation in aqueous electrolytes. In spite of its great economic and social importance, only a few papers have dealt with selective reduction of carbon dioxide to value added chemicals using renewable solar energy as the reaction promoting aid. The first im- portant step of the photoelectrochemical (PEC) reduction of CO2 to methanol is the generation of hydrogen ions and electrons by the solar irradiance of semi-conducting photoanode. Upon illumination of the semiconductor with light energy equal to or greater than that of the semiconductor bandgap, electrons are promoted from the valence band to the conduction band, creating electron- hole pairs at or near the interface. The electron-hole pairs are spatially separated by the semiconductor junction barrier, and are injected into the electrolyte at the respec- tive electrodes to produce electrochemical oxidation and reduction reactions [59-61]. A major impediment to the exploitation of photoelectrochemical cells in solar energy conversion and storage is the susceptibility of small band- gap semiconductor materials to photoanodic and photo- cathodic degradation. The photoinstability is particularly severe for n-type semiconductors where the photogener- ated holes, which reach the interface, can oxidize the semiconductor itself. In fact, all known semiconducting materials are predicted to exhibit thermodynamic insta- bility toward anodic photodegradation. Whether or not an electrode is photostable then depends on the competitive rates of the thermodynamically possible reactions, name- ly, the semiconductor decomposition reaction and the electrolyte reactions. 4. Transition-Metal Complexes as Photo-Sensitizers and Catalysts In a study, Williams and Rembaum have modified the electrodes surfaces with electron mediators such as, N,N’- dimethyl, 4,4’-bipyridinium (methyl viologen, MV+2) to enhance rates of photoelectrochemical reactions and sup- press photo-corrosion and recombination [52]. MV+2 has Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review 1410 been shown to be an efficient electron transfer catalyst for H2 evolution. The role of the MV+2/MV+1 system is to provide an oxidized material which is efficiently photo- reduced and a reduction product which can efficiently transfer electrons to water or hydrogen ions at metal (platinum) catalysts to produce H2, hν, E +2 +1 MV MV On the surface of p-type semiconductor the following reaction occurs: Pt 1+2 22g MVHOMVOH12 H The problems with mediation via solutions of methyl viologen are the intense absorption of visible light by the MV+1 species, and the relatively low concentration of the mediator. Transition-metal complexes have also often been used as photochemical and thermal catalysts because they can absorb a significant portion of the solar spectrum, have long-lived excited states, can promote multielectron transfer and activate small molecules through binding [53]. In transition-metal complexes, a central metal has octahedral, tetrahedral, square planar, square-pyramidal, or trigonal-pyramidal symmetry depending on the sur- rounding ligands. Reduced metal centers such as MIL, in which the oxidation number of the central metal (M) is plus one and the ligand (L) has four-coordinating atoms, typically have one or more vacant coordinate sites. These sites can be used to bind and activate CO2 (or other small molecules). The oxidative addition of CO2 to MIL to form a metallocarboxylate, MIIIL( ), stabilizes the CO2 moiety through two-electron transfer. The MIIIL () can then react with H+ to form MIIIL, CO and OH–. The systems that have been used for photochemical CO2 reduction studies have been divided into the follow- ing steps: 2 2 CO 2 2 CO 1) Ru(bpy)2 3(bpy-2,2”-bipyridine) as both the photo- sensitizer and the catalyst; 2) Ru(bpy)2 3 as the photosensitizer and another metal complex as the catalyst; 3) ReX(CO)3(bpy) (X = halide or phosphine-type ligand) or a similar complex as both the photosensitizer and the catalyst; 4) Ru(bpy)2 3 or Ru(bpy)2 3-type complex as the pho- tosensitizer in microheterogeneous systems; 5) A metallophorphirin as both the photosensitizer and the catalyst; 6) Organic photosensitizers with transition-metal com- plexes as catalysts. Mechanisms believed to be involved in the above process are: 1) light absorption by a photosensitizer to produce the excited state; 2) a quenching reaction be- tween the excited state and an electron donor to produce a reduced complex; 3) electron transfer from the reduced complex to a catalyst; and 4) activation of CO2 by the reduced catalyst. However, the major products formed in this process are formic acid (HCOOH) and carbon mon- oxide. 5. Passivation of Semi-Conductor Surfaces against Photocorrosion A great variety of approaches have been made to control the photo-instability of the semiconductor-electrolyte in- terfaces using surface coating techniques. For example, to stabilize semiconductor surfaces from photodecompo- sition, non-corroding layers of metals or relatively stable semi-conductor films have been reported. These con- tinuous metal films which block solvent penetration can protect n-type GaP electrodes from photo-corrosion. However, if the films are too thick for the photo-gener- ated holes to penetrate without being scattered, they as- sume the Fermi energy of the metal. Then the system is equivalent to a metal electrolysis electrode in series with a metal-semi-conductor Schottky barrier. In such a sys- tem, the metal-semiconductor junction controls the pho- tovolatge and not the electrolytic reactions. In general, a bias is required to drive the water oxidation. In other cases, the metal can form an Ohmic contact that leads to the loss of the photoactivity of the semiconductor. In discontinuous metal coatings, the electrolyte contacts the semiconductor, a situation which can lead to photo-cor- rosion. For example, discontinuous gold films do not seem to protect n-type GaP from photo-corrosion [42- 58]. Corrosion-resistant wide-bandgap oxide semiconductor (TiO2 and titanates mostly) coatings over narrow-band- gap n-type semiconductors such as GaAs, Si, CdS, GaP, and InP have been shown to impart protection from pho- todecomposition. One of two problems is currently associ- ated with the use of optically transparent, wide-bandgap semiconducting oxide coatings: either a thick film blocks charge transmission, or a thin film still allows photocorro- sion [47,48]. 6. The Electro-Active and the Charge Conductive Polymers In a study it has been shown that chemical bonding of electroactive polymers to the semiconductor surface af- fects the interfacial charge-transfer kinetics such that the less thermodynamically favoured redox reaction in the electrolyte predominates over the thermodynamically favoured semiconductor decomposition reaction [48]. To date, emphasis has been placed on improving the cata- lytic properties of p-type electrodes, where photocorro- sion by reductive processes is not a major problem. The overvoltage for the evolution of hydrogen from p-type Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review1411 electrode surfaces is normally quite large. It has been demonstrated, however, that the catalytic property of a p-type Si photocathode is enhanced for hydrogen evolu- tion when a viologen derivative is chemically bonded to the electrode surface and Pt particles are dispersed within the polymer matrix [47]. The viologen mediates the transfer of the photogenerated electron to H+ by the pla- tinum to form H2. A thin platinum coating directly on the p-type silicon surface also improves the catalytic per- formance of the electrode. Charge conduction is gener- ally much higher in electrically conductive polymers than in typical electroactive polymers [42-58]. Accordingly, work on charge conductive polymers in the filed of photoelectrochemistry has been directed to- ward stabilization of electrodes against photodegradation in electricity-generating cells. Charge conductive poly- mers are known to protect certain semiconductor surfaces from photodecomposition, by transmitting photogener- ated holes in the semiconductor to oxidizable species in the electrolyte at a rate much higher than the thermody- namically-favoured rate of decomposition of the elec- trode. In a study it has been demonstrated that coating n-type silicon semiconductor photoelectrodes with a charge conductive polymer, such as polypyrrole, enhan- ces stability against surface oxidation in electricity-ge- nerating cells. n-type GaAs has also been coated with po- lypyrrole to reduce photodecomposition in electricity-ge- nerating cells, although the polymer exhibited poor adhe- sion in aqueous electrolyte [42-58]. Despite the promising use of polypyrrole on n-type silicon to suppress photodecomposition, heretofore, whe- ther or not conductive polymers in general could be used in conjunction with catalysts was unknown. Moreover, it can be seen that the discovery of uses for various poly- mer coatings on photoelectrodes has been on a case by case basis because of the empirical nature of the effects on any particular semiconductor and/or the interaction with a given electrolyte environment [42-70]. 7. Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction The reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol is repre- sented as CO2 + 6H+ + 6e– CH3OH + H2O. In a study, Jr. Frese, et al. [35], carried out this reaction over the surface of a molybdenum cathode. According to them, a molybdenum cathode can reduce carbon dioxide to methanol selectively and with up to 80% to 100% fara- daic efficiency. Such reductions can occur, for example, at –0.7 V vs SCE at pH 4.2, only 160 mV negative of the standard potential corrected for pH. However, this proc- ess is yet to be tested in a PEC cell. In another study, Barton et al. [51], conducted a selec- tive solar-driven reduction of CO2 to methanol using a catalyzed p-GaP based photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell in a process called chemical carbon mitigation. The pho- toinduced conversion of CO2 to a value-added product without the use of additional CO2 generating power source is referred to as “chemical carbon mitigation”. More than 95% conversion and 100% methanol selectiv- ity was noted in this process. However, the stability of this semiconductor is to be tested to see the feasibility of this process running on a commercial basis. Rather in another study, Xu et al. [13], successfully reduced CO2 to methanol following a biochemical ap- proach in which formate dehydrogenase, formaldehyde dehydrogenase, and alcohol dehydrogenase were used as catalysts. Prior to reaction, these dehydrogenase catalysts were encapsulated in an alginate-silica hybrid gel, which was formed through in situ growth of the silica precursor within the alginate solution that was followed by Ca2+ cross-linking. The methanol yields noted in this process were 98.8%, 71.3% and 98.1%, respectively, for reac- tions catalyzed by free dehydrogenases, dehydrogenases immobilized in pure alginate and dehydrogenases immo- bilized in alginate-silica. The latter catalyst showed the methanol yield of 76.2% even after stored for 60 days. Nevertheless, these catalysts are yet to be tested in PEC cells for the same reaction. 8. Water Oxidation Catalysts Recently, a path breaking observation was made at Law- rence Berkeley National Laboratory by Heinz Frei and Feng Jiao [62]. They prepared an aqueous solution con- taining silica particles that have been embedded with photooxidizing cobalt oxide nanocrystals plus a sensi- tizer to allow the water-splitting reaction to be driven by visible light. When this solution was irradiated by laser light it turned from gold to blue as the sensitizer ab- sorbed the light. Bubbles soon begin to form as oxygen gas was released from the split water molecules. The idea of Frei and Jiao was to develop artificial leaves in which light harvesting occurs by capturing of solar pho- tons by the oxidation of water over a bio-catalyst. Green plants perform the photooxidation of water molecules within a complex of proteins called Photosystem II, in which manganese-containing enzymes serve as the cata- lyst. Manganese-based organometallic complexes mod- eled off Photosystem II have been tested by them for the same reaction. Though these catalysts have shown some promise as photocatalysts for water oxidation but suf- fered from being water insoluble and none were very robust. In looking for purely inorganic catalysts that would dissolve in water and would be far more robust than biomimetic materials, Frei and Jiao turned to cobalt oxide, a highly abundant material that is an important industrial catalyst. When they have tested micron-sized particles of cobalt oxide, they found the particles were Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review 1412 inefficient and not nearly fast enough to serve as photo- catalysts. However, when they nano-sized the particles, it was another story. The yield for clusters of cobalt ox- ide (Co3O4) nano-sized crystals was about 1600 times higher than for micron-sized particles and the turnover frequency (speed) was about 1140 oxygen molecules per second per cluster, which is commensurate with solar flux at ground level (approximately 1000 Watts per square meter). Frei and Jiao used mesoporous silica as their scaffold, growing their cobalt nanocrystals within the naturally parallel nanoscale channels of the silica via wet impregnation technique. The best performers were rod-shaped crystals measuring 8 nm in diameter and 50 nm in length, which were interconnected by short brid- ges to form bundled clusters. The bundles were shaped like a sphere with a diameter of 35 nm. While the cata- lytic efficiency of the cobalt metal itself was important, they presumed that the major factor behind the enhanced efficiency and speed of the bundles was their size. However, their catalyst is yet to be tested in a reaction of water oxidation integrated with the carbon dioxide re- duction step via artificial photosynthesis, which is really a challenging task. In another study, Geletti et al. [63], developed a water soluble new inorganic metal oxide (i.e., a polyoxometa- late, POM) cluster with a core consisting of four ions of the rare transition metal ruthenium, which has shown the fast and effective oxidation of water to oxygen while remaining stable itself. They say that in contrast to all other molecular catalysts for water oxidation, their cata- lyst does not contain any organic components and that is the reason for its stability in water. However, while Ru is more abundant and also less expensive than several other precious metals, its use would nonetheless be problematical for many large-scale green energy appli- cations. Given this reality, they turned to the develop- ment and evaluation of POMs containing multiple earth-abundant metals as potential water oxidation cata- lysts (WOCs). Finally, they succeeded in realising a fast soluble carbon-free molecular water oxidation catalyst based on abundant metals (Co, W and P) [64,65]. The POM, [Co4 (H 2O)2(PW9O34)2]10– prepared by them was found to be comprising a Co4O4 core stabilized by oxi- datively resistant polytungstate ligands. It was also found to be hydrolytically and oxidatively stable ho- mogenous WOC that self assembles in water from salts of Co, W and P. With [Ru(bpy)3]3+ (bpy is 2,2’-bi-pyri- dine) as the oxidant, this catalyst showed catalytic turn- over frequencies for O2 production ≥ 5 s–1 at pH = 8. According to them, their next challenge is to integrate these inorganic complexes into photoactive systems, which efficiently convert solar energy into chemical en- ergy. So far, energy is still obtained from chemical oxi- dants in their studies [65]. 9. Scope for the Future Research The above information clearly suggests that among vari- ous routes proposed for conversion of CO2 to methanol or to any other value added chemical, the photoelectro- chemical (PEC) cells have an edge over other process. In order to realize efficient PEC cells for this reaction, 1) an n-type semiconductor with desired bade gap and band edges for photoanode (e.g., pure TiO2, ZnO, CdS, etc.); 2) a p-type semi-conductor with desired band gap and band edges for photocathode (e.g., doped TiO2, ZnO, GaP, etc.); 3) a catalyst for performing water oxidation reac- tion over or near to the surface of photoanode (e.g., polyoxometallates [63-65]), and 4) a catalyst to perform CO2 reduction reaction over or near to the surface of photocathode (e.g., pyridinium ions over the surface of p-GaP [18,41,51]) are essential. Furthermore, these four systems should exhibit quite stability in water under solar irradiation. In addition to these, it is also required to un- derstand the following underlined mechanisms for suc- cessful realization of PEC cells for converting CO2 to value added chemicals. 1) Underlined mechanisms in water oxidation and CO2 reduction reactions over the surfaces of photoanode and photocathode, respectively; 2) The mechanisms involved in the dissolution and evolution of CO2 in water soluble organic solvents such as monomethanol amine, etc., to perform CO2 reduction reactions in PEC cells containing water based electrolyte; 3) Interaction of conducting polymers with both photo- anode and photo-cathode materials; 4) Underlined mechanisms in the corrosion of non- oxide (for e.g., GaP and CdS) semi-conducting materials in water upon solar irradiance and in the passivation of these semi-conducting materials surfaces against photo- degradation; 5) Underlined mechanisms in the suppression of H2 formation from H+ ions produced over the surface of photo-anode upon solar irradiation in PEC cells con- tained water based electrolyte at the surface of photo- cathode; 6) The behaviour of electron and ion transporting of water-soluble organics/catalysts in PEC cells; 7) Finally, integration of various systems required for conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol or to any value added chemical in PEC cells. 10. Acknowledgements Author wishes to thank Dr. G. Sundararajan, Director, ARCI, Hyderabad for his kind encouragement and for giving permission to publish this review article. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review1413 REFERENCES [1] A. B. Robinson, N. E. Robinson and A. Soon, “Environ- mental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Diox- ide,” Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Vol. 12, 2007, pp. 79-90. [2] IPCC, “Summary for Policemakers,” Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Work- ing Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the In- tergovermental Panel on Climate Change, 4 May 2007. http://ipcc-wgl.ucar.edu/wgl/Report/AR4WG1Print SPM. pdf/ [3] J. David and H. Herzog, “The Cost of Carbon Capture,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Green- house Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, 13-16 August 2000, pp. 985-990. [4] M. Gupta, I. Coyle and K. Thambimuthu, “CO2 Capture Technologies and Opportunities in Canada,” Strawman Document for CO2 Capture and Storage (CC & S) Techno- logy Roadmap, 1st Canadian CC & S Technology Road- map Workshop, Calgary, September 2003, pp. 18-19. [5] R. Priddle, “World Energy Outlook 2002,” 2nd Edition, International Energy Agency, IEA/OECD, Paris, 2002. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/weo2002.pdf [6] UDI, “World Electric Power-Plants Database,” Utility Data Institute, McGraw-Hill, Washington DC, 2003. [7] ENI, “World Oil and Gas Review 2004,” Rome, 2004. http://www.agip.it/ [8] World Energy Council, “19th Survey of World Energy Resources,” World Energy Council, London, 2001. http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/defaul t/launches/ser/ser.asp [9] G. Moritis, “EOR Continues to Unlock Oil Resources,” Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 12, 2004, pp. 53-65. [10] M. Halmon, “Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Aque- ous Carbon-Dioxide on p-Type Gallium-Phosphide in Liquid Junction Solar-Cells,” Nature, Vol. 275, 1978, pp. 115-116. doi:10.1038/275115a0 [11] A. Aruchamy, G. Aravamudan and G. V. Subba Rao, “Semiconductor Based Photoelectrochemical Cells for So- lar Energy Conversion—An Overview,” Bulletin of Mate- rial Science, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1982, pp. 483-526. doi:10.1007/BF02824960 [12] L. R. Sheppard and J. Nowotny, “Materials for Photo- electrochemical Energy Conversion,” Advances in Ap- plied Ceramics, Vol. 106, No. 1-2, 2007, pp. 9-20. doi:10.1179/174367607X152353 [13] S. W. Xu, Y. Lu, J. Li, Z. Y. Jiang and H. Wu, “Efficient Conversion of CO2 to Methanol Catalyzed by Three De- hydrogenases Co-Encapsulated in an Alginate-Silica (ALG- SiO2) Hybrid Gel,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 45, No. 13, 2006, pp. 4567-4573. doi:10.1021/ie051407l [14] G. A. Olah, A. Geoppert and G. K. S. Prakash, “Chemical Recycling of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol and Di- methylether: From Greenhouse Gas to Renewable, Envi- ronmentally Carbon Neutral Fuels and Synthetic Hydro- carbons,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2009, pp. 487-498. doi:10.1021/jo801260f [15] M. Khoshtinat, N. A. S. Amin and I. Noshadi, “A Review of Methanol Production from Methane Oxidation via Non-Thermal Plasma Reactor,” World Academy of Sci- ence, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 62, 2010, pp. 354-358. [16] E. Thimsen, F. L. Formal, M. Gratzel and S. C. Warren, “Influence of Plasmonic Au Nanoparticles on the Photo- activity of Fe2O3 Electrodes for Water Splitting,” Nano Letters, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2011, pp. 35-43. doi:10.1021/nl1022354 [17] D. J. Darensbourg, “Chemistry of Carbon Dioxide Rele- vant to Its Utilization: A Personal Perspective,” Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 23, 2010, pp. 10765-10780. doi:10.1021/ic101800d [18] E. B. Cole, P. S. Lakkaraju, D. M. Rampulla, A. J. Morris, E. Abelev and A. B. Bocarsly, “Using a One-Electron Shuttle for the Multielectron Reduction of CO2 to Methanol: Kinetic, Mechanistic, and Structural Insights,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 132, No. 33, 2010, pp. 11539-11551. doi:10.1021/ja1023496 [19] P. M. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang and C. B. Musgrave, “Si- multaneous Two-Hydrogen Transfer as a Mechanism for Efficient CO2 Reduction,” Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 19, 2010, pp. 8724-8728. doi:10.1021/ic100454z [20] M. Pehnt, “Fuel Cells in the Power Market: Separating the Hope from the Hype,” Presentation at CAN Europe meeting, Brussels, 27 May 2004. http://www.climnet.org/CTAP/workshop2004/Presentatio nsWS2.htm/ [21] A. J. Traynor and R. J. Jensen, “Direct Solar Reduction of CO2 to Fuel: First Prototype Results,” Industrial & Engi- neering Chemistry Research, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2002, pp. 1935-1939. doi:10.1021/ie010871x [22] C. Mandil, “Prospects for CO2 Capture and Storage,” International Energy Agency and Energy Technology Analysis, IEA Publications, 2004. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2004/prospects.pdf [23] S. Bachu, “Sequestration of CO2 in Geological Media: Criteria and Approach for Site Selection in Response to Climate Change,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2000, pp. 953-970. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00149-1 [24] S. Bachu and J. J. Adams, “Sequestration of CO2 in Geo- logical Media in Response to Climate Change: Capacity of Deep Saline Aquifers to Sequester CO2 in Solution,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 44, No. 20, 2003, pp. 3151-3175. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00101-8 [25] R. G. Bruant, M. A. Celia, A. J. Guswa and C. A. Peters, “Safe Storage of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers,” Envi- ronmental Science and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2002, pp. 240A-245A. doi:10.1021/es0223325 [26] J. Gale, “Using Coal Seams for CO2 Sequestration,” Ge- ologica Belgica, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 99-103. [27] T. Holt, J. I. Jensen and E. Lindeberg, “Underground Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review 1414 Storage of CO2 in Aquifers and Oil Reservoirs,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 36, No. 6-9, 1995, pp. 535-538. doi:10.1016/0196-8904(95)00061-H [28] C. W. Hustad, “Infrastructure for CO2 Collection, Trans- port and Sequestration,” The 3rd Nordic Mini-Symposium on Carbon Dioxide Storage, Presented Paper, Trondheim, 1-2 October 2003. [29] F. V. Bergen, J. Gale, K. J. Damen and A. F. B. Wilden- borg, “Worldwide Selection of Early Opportunities for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2-Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Production,” Energy, Vol. 29, No. 9-10, 2004, pp. 1611-1621. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.063 [30] C. Salvador, D. Lu, E. J. Anthony and J. C. Abanades, “Enhancement of CaO for CO2 Capture in an FBC Envi- ronment,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2003, pp. 187-195. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.011 [31] J. C. Hicks, J. H. Drese, D. J. Fauth, McMahan L. Gray, G. Qi and C. W. Jones, “Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas-Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Ca- pable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 130, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2902-2903. doi:10.1021/ja077795v [32] S. K. Ritter, “What Can We Do with Carbon Dioxide? Scientists Are Trying to Find Ways to Convert the Plen- tiful Greenhouse Gas into Fuels and Other Value-Added Products,” Chemical & Engineering News, Vol. 85, No. 18, 2007, pp. 11-17. [33] M.-J. Choi and D.-H. Cho1, “Review: Research Activities on the Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Korea,” Clean, Vol. 36, No. 5-6, 2008, pp. 426-432. [34] J. W. Dijkstra and D. Jansen, “Novel Concepts for CO2 Capture with SOFC,” Proceedings of the 6th Interna- tional Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technolo- gies, Kyoto, 1-4 October 2002, pp. 161-166. doi:10.1016/B978-008044276-1/50026-X [35] K. W. Frese Jr., S. C. Leach and D. P. Summers, “Elec- trochemical Reduction of Aqueous Carbon Dioxide to Methanol,” US Patent No. 4,609,441, 2 September 1986. [36] S. T. Hussain, M. M. Muhammad and H. U. Rehman, “Novel Process and Catalyst for Carbon Dioxide Conver- sion to Energy Generating Products,” Patent file numbers: IPC8 Class: AC07C2706FI, USPC Class: 518712. [37] B. Dickson, I. Yashayaev, J. Meincke, B. Turrell, S. Dye and J. Holfort, “Rapid Freshening of the Deep North At- lantic Ocean over the Past Four Decades,” Nature, Vol. 416, No. 6883, 2002, pp. 832-837. doi:10.1038/416832a [38] M. R. Dubois and D. L. Dubois, “Development of Mo- lecular Electrocatalysts for CO2 Reduction and H2 Pro- duction/Oxidation,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2009, pp. 1974-19982. doi:10.1021/ar900110c [39] R. J. Jensen, J. L. Lyman, J. D. King and R. D. Guettler, “Solar Reduction of CO2”, US Patent No. 6,066,187, 23 May 2000. [40] Exxon Mobil Algae Biofuels Research and Development Program, 1978. http://www.exxonmobil.com/corporate/files/news_pub_al gae_factsheet.pdf/ [41] G. Seshadri, C. Lin and A. B. Bocarsly, “A New Electro- catalyst for the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol at Low Overpotential,” Journal of Electroanalytical Che- mistry, Vol. 372, No. 1-2, 1994, pp. 145-150. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(94)03300-5 [42] N. Spataru, K. Tokuhiro, C. Terashima, T. N. Rao and A. Fujishima, “Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Diox- ide at Ruthenium Dioxide Deposited on Boron-Doped Diamond,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1205-1210. doi:10.1023/B:JACH.0000003866.85015.b6 [43] A. Fujishima, D. A. Tryk and T. N. Rao, “New Ap- proaches in CO2 Reduction,” Advances in Chemical Con- versions for Mitigating Carbon Dioxide, Vol. 114, 1998, pp. 31-42. In: T. Inuiv, M. Anpo, K. Izui, S. Yanagida and T. Yamaguchi, Ed., Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Book Series, Elsevier, Amsterdam. [44] J. Ryu, T. N. Andersen and H. Eyring, “Electrode Reduc- tion Kinetics of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Medium,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 76, No. 22, 1972, pp. 3278-3286. doi:10.1021/j100666a029 [45] K. Ogura and M. D. S. Viallalpando, “CO2 Electro- chemical Reduction via Adsorbed Halide Anions,” Jour- nal of Operations Management, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 35-38. http://www.springerlink.com/content/818vx0624h6112lk/ fulltext.pdf [46] S. Kapusta and N. Hackerman, “The Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide and Formic Acid on Tin and Indium Electrodes,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 130, No. 3, 1983, pp. 607-613. doi:10.1149/1.2119761 [47] K. Ohashi, J. McCann and J. O. M. Bockris, “Stable Pho- toelectrochemical Cells for Splitting of Water,” Nature, Vol. 266, No. 5603, 1977, pp. 610-611. doi:10.1038/266610a0 [48] R. Bhardwaj, R. L. Pan and E. L. Gross, “Solar-Energy Conversion by Chloroplast Photoelectrochemical Cells,” Nature, Vol. 289, No. 5796, 1981, pp. 396-398. doi:10.1038/289396a0 [49] S. Licht, “A Description of Energy-Conversion in Photo- electrochemical Solar-Cells,” Nature, Vol. 330, No. 6144, 1987, pp. 148-151. doi:10.1038/330148a0 [50] M. Gratzel, “Photoelectrochemical Cells,” Nature, Vol. 414, No. 6861, 2001, pp. 338-344. doi:10.1038/35104607 [51] E. E. Barton, D. M. Rampulla and A. B. Bocarsly, “Se- lective Solar-Driven Reduction of CO2 to Methanol Using a Catalyzed p-GaP Based Photoelectrochemical Cell,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 130, No. 20, 2008, pp. 6342-6344. doi:10.1021/ja0776327 [52] R. M. Williams and A. Rembaum, “Photoelectrochemical Electrodes,” US Patent No. 4,414,080, 8 November 1983. [53] A. J. Frank, “Organic Conductive Films for Semiconduc- tor Electrodes,” US Patent No. 4,461,691, 24 July 1984. [54] M. Gratzel and K. Kalyanasundaram, “Artificial Photo- synthesis: Efficient Dye-Sensitized Photoelectrochemical Cells for Direct Conversion of Visible-Light to Electric- Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA
 Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol Using Solar Energy—A Brief Review Copyright © 2011 SciRes. MSA 1415 ity,” Current Science, Vol. 66, No. 10, 1994, pp. 706-714. [55] A. J. Bard, “Semiconductor Photoelectrochemical Cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 126, No. 3, 1979, pp. C145-C145. [56] D. Haneman, “Surfaces for Photoelectrochemical Cells,” Surface Science, Vol. 86, 1979, pp. 462-485. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(79)90424-2 [57] J. Manassen, G. Hodes and D. Cahen, “Photoelectro- chemical Cells,” Chemical Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1981, pp. 112-117. [58] S. Yae, T. Kobayashi, M. Abe, N. Nasu, N. Fukumuro, S. Ogawa, N. Yoshida, S. Nonomura, Y. Nakato and H. Ma- tsuda, “Solar to Chemical Conversion Using Metal Nano- particle Modified Microcrystalline Silicon Thin Film Photoelectrode,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Vol. 91, No. 4, 2007, pp. 224-229. [59] A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode,” Nature, Vol. 238, No. 5358, 1972, pp. 37-38. doi:10.1038/238037a0 [60] A. Fujishima, K. Kohayakawa and K. Honda, “Formation of Hydrogen Gas with an Electrochemical Photo-Cell,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Vol. 48, No. 3, 1975, pp. 1041-1042. doi:10.1246/bcsj.48.1041 [61] T. Watanabe, T. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Photoelctro- chemical Hydrogen Production,” In: T. Ohta, Ed., Solar Hydrogen Energy Systems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979, pp. 137-169. [62] F. Jiao and H. Frei, “Water Oxidation: Nanostructured Cobalt Oxide Clusters in Mesoporous Silica as Efficient Oxygen-Evolving Catalysts,” Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 121, No. 10, 2009, pp. 1873-1876. doi:10.1002/ange.200805534 [63] Y. V. Geletii, B. Botar, P. Kogerler, D. A. Hillesheim, D. G. Musaev and C. L. Hill, “Oxygen Generation: An All-In- organic, Stable, and Highly Active Tetraruthenium Homo- geneous Catalyst for Water Oxidation,” Angewandte Che- mie, Vol. 47, No. 21, 2008, pp. 3896-3899. doi:10.1002/anie.200705652 [64] Q. Yin, J. M. Tan, C. Besson, Y. V. Geletii, D. G. Mu- saev, A. E. Kuznetsov, Z. Luo, K. I. Hardcastle and C. L. Hill, “A Fast Soluble Carbon-Free Molecular Water Oxi- dation Catalyst Based on Abundant Metals,” Science, Vol. 328, No. 5976, 2010, pp. 342-345. doi:10.1126/science.1185372 [65] Y. V. Geletii, Q. Yin, Y. Hou, Z. Huang, H. Ma, J. Song, C. Besson, Z. Luo, R. Cao, K. P. O’Halloran, C. Zhao, J. W. Vickers, Y. Ding, S. Mohebbi, A. E. Kuznetsov, D. G. Musaev, T. Lian and C. L. Hill, “Polyoxometalates in the Design of Effective and Tunable Water Oxidation Cata- lysts—A Review,” Israel Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2011, pp. 238-246. doi:10.1002/ijch.201100021 [66] K. V. C. Rao, M. R. Rao, M. P. Nair, V. G. Kumar and C. G. R. Nair, “TiO2-SiO2 Based Photoanodes in Photoelec- trochemical Cells—Performance and Evaluation Studies,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1989, pp. 295-301. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(89)90129-8 [67] B. van der Zwaan and A. Rabl, “The Learning Potential of Photovoltaics: Implications for Energy Policy,” Energy Policy, Vol. 32, No. 13, 2004, pp. 1545-1554. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00126-5 [68] S. Chandra, P. K. Pandey and R. C. Agrawal, “Solar En- ergy Conversion by Photoelectrichemical Cells Using Che- mical-Bath-Deposited CdS Films,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 13, No. 9, 1980, pp. 1757-1760. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/13/9/025 [69] A. Gupta and A. S. N. Murthy, “Photoelectrochemical Behaviour of Polypyrrole Coated Cadmium Telluride,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1992, pp. 113-121. doi:10.1016/0927-0248(92)90003-8 [70] T. Bak, J. Nowotny, M. Rekas and C. C. Sorrell, “Review Article: Photo-Electrochemical Hydrogen Generation from Water Using Solar Energy. Materials-Related Aspects,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 27, No. 10, 2002, pp. 991-1022.
|