Engineering
Vol. 3  No. 3 (2011) , Article ID: 4146 , 4 pages DOI:10.4236/eng.2011.33029

Transient Waves Due to Thermal Sources in a Generalized Piezothermoelastic Half-Space

Jagan Nath Sharma, Anita Devi Thakur, Yogeshwar Dutt Sharma

Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India

E-mail: jns@nitham.ac.in, anitanithamirpur@yahoo.com, yds@nitham.ac.in

Received October 18, 2010; revised October 26, 2010; accepted January 9, 2011

Keywords: Thermal Sources, Integral Transforms, Romberg Integration, Relaxation Time, DesCartes’ Algorithm

ABSTRACT

This paper is devoted to the study of disturbances due to impact and continuous strip thermal sources, temperature or temperature gradient input acting on the rigidly fixed and charge free (open circuit) surface of a homogeneous, transversely isotropic, thermally conducting, generalized piezothermoelastic half-space. The Laplace and Fourier transforms technique have been employed to solve the model consisting of partial differential equations and boundary conditions in the transformed domain. In order to obtain the results in the physical domain the quadratic complex polynomial characteristic equation corresponding to the associated system of coupled ordinary differential equations has been solved by using DesCartes’ algorithm with the help of irreducible Cardano’s method. The inverse transform integrals are evaluated by using numerical technique consisting of Fourier series approximation and Romberg integration. The temperature change, stresses and electric potential so obtained in the physical domain are computed numerically and presented graphically for cadmium selenide (CdSe) material. The study may find applica-tions in smart structures, piezoelectric filters, resonators, transducers, sensing devices and vibration control.

1. Introduction

Application of different types of loads on the surface of piezoelectric materials is an active research subject for engineers and scientists. Smart and intelligent structures are developed to enhance the performance of the structural components. In some cases, the load bearing substrates of these smart structures are made of composite materials. Ashida et al. [1] provides an overview of the use of piezoelectric materials in intelligent structures for aerospace applications. The mechanical and fracture properties of piezoelectric ceramics under thermal loading conditions have gained much attention [2,3]. There are some factors such as economical, less fuel consumption, higher speed achievement, ability to adapt to various applied loads and environment, which increases the interest to enhance the performance (e.g. load carrying capacity, crash or buckling behaviors) of the structural components in aerospace, ground vehicles, hydrospace, nuclear engineering, navigation, civil, mechanical engineering and ship manufacturing industries etc.

The theory of coupling of thermal and strain fields gives rise to coupled thermoelasticity and was formulated by Duhamel [4], which predicts the infinite speed of heat transportation. Lord and Schulman [5] and Green and Lindsay [6] have formulated non-classical (generalized) theories of thermoelasticity which eliminate the paradox of infinite velocity of heat propagation inherited in classical theory of thermoelasticity. According to these theories, heat propagation should be viewed as a wave phenomenon rather than diffusion one. A wave-like thermal disturbance is referred to as “second sound” by Chandrasekharaiah [7]. Ackerman et al. [8] and Ackerman and Overtone [9] proved experimentally for solid Helium that thermal waves (second sound) propagating with a finite, though quite large speed also exit. Guyer and Krumhansl [10] studied the second sound effect in solid Helium analytically. The recent and relevant theoretical development on this subject are due to Green and Nagdhi [11-13], which provide sufficient basic modification in the constitutive equations that permit treatment of a much wider class of heat flow problem.

Harinath [14,15] considered the problem of surface point and line source over a homogeneous isotropic generalized thermoelastic halfspace. Majhi [16] introduced a potential function and applied the LS theory to study the transient thermal response of a semi-infinite piezoelectric rod subjected to a local heat source along the length direction. The physical laws for the thermo-piezoelectric materials have been explored by Nowacki [17,18]. Chandrasekhariah [19,20] developed the generalized theory of thermo-piezoelectricity by taking in account the finite speed of propagation of thermal disturbances. Honig and Dhaliwal [21], solved a boundary value problem of an isotropic elastic halfspace with its plane boundary either rigidly fixed or stress free and subjected to sudden temperature increase. Nirula and Noda [22,23] treated the problems of crack breaking at the surface of piezothermoelastic semi-infinite body and a strip under steady thermal load. Sharma and Kumar [24] investigated the plane strain problems of transversely isotropic thermoelastic medium by employing an eigenvalue approach after applying the technique of Laplace and Fourier transform. Sharma et al. [25] studied the disturbances in the piezothermoelastic halfspace due to periodic strip thermal sources acting on its surface. The model of two dimensional equations of generalized magneto-thermoelasticity in a perfectly conducting medium has been established by Aouadi [26].

The present paper deals with the distribution of temperature change, stresses and electric potential in a generalized piezo-thermoelastic (6 mm class) material halfspace due to impact and continuous strip thermal sources acting on its surface. A combination of the Laplace and Fourier integral transforms has been used to solve the problem in the transform domain. The results in the physical domain are attained with the help of a numerical technique for inverting the integral transforms [27]. The computer simulated results in respect of stresses; temperature change and electric potential have been presented graphically for cadmium selenide (6 mm class) material. A comprehensive analysis and comparison of results in various theories has been presented.

2. Formulation of the Problem

We consider a homogeneous, transversely isotropic, thermally conducting generalized piezothermoelastic halfspace which is initially at uniform temperature. We takeaxis along the poling direction and also as sume that the medium is transversely isotropic in the sense that the planes of isotropy are perpendicular to the axis. We take origin of the co-ordinate system at any point on the plane surface and axis pointing vertically downward into the halfspace, which is thus represented by. It is assumed that an impact/continuous strip thermal source is acting at the rigidly fixed surface of the medium as shown in the Figure 1. From the symmetry consideration all the field quantities are independent of coordinate. We further assume that the field quantities vanish as . Let, and respectively, denote displacement vector, temperature change and electric potential in the considered solid. The non-dimensional basic governing field equations and constitutive relations for a homogeneous, transversely isotropic piezothermoelastic solid halfspace; in the absence of charge density, heat sources and body forces, are given by Sharma and Walia [28].

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

and are the electrical displacement and electric potential, respectively. The superposed dot denotes time

Figure 1. Geometry of the problem.

derivatives and coma notation is used for spatial derivatives.

Where we have defined and used the quantities

(9)

The primes have been suppressed for convenience. Here, and, are respectively, the coefficients of linear thermal expansion and thermal conductivity, in the direction orthogonal to the axis of symmetry and along the axis of symmetry; and are the mass density and specific heat at constant strain, respectively; is the thermoelastic coupling constant; is the characteristic frequency of the medium; is piezothermoelastic coupling constant; are elastic parameters; are piezoelectric constants;, are the electric permittivities perpendicular and along the axis of symmetry; is pyroelectric constant in direction; and are respectively denote stresses and electrical displacement;, are the thermal relaxation time parameters and is the longitudinal wave velocity in the medium. The symbol is Kronecker’s delta in which corresponds to the Lord-Shulman (LS) and refers to the Green-Lindsay (GL) theories of thermoelasticity. The thermal relaxation time parameters and satisfy the inequalities

(10)

in case of GL theory only. However, it has been proved by Strunin [29] that the Inequalities (10) are not necessary to be satisfied.

3. Initial, Regularity and Boundary Conditions

The following initial and regularity conditions are assumed to be satisfied:

(11)

In addition to above boundary conditions, the surface of the piezothermoelastic solid is subjected to time dependant strip thermal sources (impact or continuous) in the region and assumed to be rigidly fixed and charge free (open circuit). Therefore, the corresponding boundary conditions are given as Rigidly fixed and open circuit:

(12.1)

Temperature input (TI):

(12.2)

Temperature gradient (TG):

(12.3)

where, and, the prime has been suppressed. Here the function is a well behaved function of time and is defined as

where is a Heaviside unit step function, denotes the Dirac delta function.

4. Solution of the Problem

In order to solve the problem we apply Laplace transform with respect to time ‘t’ and Fourier transform with respect to x defined by Churchill [30]

(13)

(14)

Upon operating Transformations (13) and (14) on the system of Equations (1) to (4), we obtain

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

where, , ,

The above coupled system of ordinary differential Equations (15-18) upon retaining that part of the solution which satisfies the radiation condition (j = 1, 2, 3, 4) leads to the following formal transformed solution

(19)

where, and are the amplitude ratios, obtained as

, , (20)

and the characteristic roots are given by the relations

(21)

Here the quantities F, and, are defined in the Appendix. Upon using Solution (19) in the Equations (5-8), the transformed stresses and electric displacement are obtained as

(22)

where

(23)

Upon applying integral transforms (13) and (14) to the boundary conditions (12) and using the Solution (22), we obtain a nonhomogeneous system of linear algebraic equations in the unknowns for each set of conditions, TI or TG.

After solving the above system of equations we obtain

(24)

where

(25)

and can be written from by replacing the permutation of suffixes (2, 3, 4) in and with (1, 3, 4), (1, 2, 4) and (1, 2, 3) respectively.

Thus the transformed solutions of various field functions such as displacements, temperature change, stresses, electric potential and electric displacement can be obtained from Equations (19) and (22) upon solving the values of from Equation (24) in case of thermal loads (TI/TG) under the considered electrical and mechanical conditions prevailing at the surface of the halfspace.

5. Inversion of the Transforms

Due to the existence of damping term in Equations (1-4) the dependence of characteristic roots on the integral transform parameters and is complicated. Hence analytically inversion of integral transform is difficult and cumbersome because the isolation of and q is not easily possible. This difficulty, however, can be overcome if we use some approximate or numerical methods. Therefore, in order to obtain the solution of the instant problem in the physical domain, we invert the integral transforms in Equations (19) and (22) by using a numerical technique [27] outlined below.

The expressions for various transformed field functions can formally be expressed as a function of, and of the form. Upon inverting the Fourier transform, we get

(26)

where and respectively, denote the even and odd parts of the function with respect to. For fixed values of, and, the function inside the braces in Equation (26) can be considered as a Laplace transform of some function. Using the inversion formula for Laplace transform [31] provides

(27)

where is an arbitrary real number greater than the real parts of the singularities of. Taking, the above Integral (27) takes the form

(28)

Expanding the function in Fourier series in the interval, the approximate Formula (28) becomes

(29)

where

(30)

is the discretisation error which can be made arbitrarily small by choosing large enough. Since the infinite series in Equation (29) can be summed up to a finite number (N) of terms, the approximate value of h (t) becomes

(31)

While using Formula (31) to evaluate, we also introduce a truncation error that must be added to the discretisation error to produce the total approximation error. In order to accelerate the process of convergence of the solution, the “Korrecktur” method is used to reduce the discretisation error and the algorithm is employed to reduce the truncation error. The Korrecktur formula provides us where and. Thus, the approximate value of becomes

(32)

where is an integer such that. We shall now describe the algorithm that is used to accelerate the convergence of the series in Equation (31). Let N be an odd natural number and let be the sequence of partial sums of Equation (31). We define the sequence by

, ,;

It can be shown that the sequence converges to faster than the sequence of partial sums (m = 1, 2, 3,). The actual procedure used to invert the Laplace transforms consists of using Equation (29) together with the -algorithm. The values of and are chosen according to the criteria outlined by Honig and Hirdes [32].

The last step in the inversion process is to evaluate the Integral (26). According to Bradie [33], the various quadrature formulae such as Newton-Cotes, Romberg and Gaussian quadrature etc. can be used to approximate the value of an improper integral, provided the integral exists. However, some change of variable generally must be made to achieve theoretical order of convergence, if required. Here the evaluation of Integral (26) has been done by using Romberg integration with adaptive step size, which uses the results from successive refinements of the extended trapezoidal rule followed by extrapolation of the results to the limit when the step size tends to zero. The details can be found in Press et al. [34].

6. Numerical Results and Discussion

In order to illustrate and compare the theoretical results obtained in the previous sections, in the context of LS, GL and CT theories of thermoelasticity, we now present some numerical results. The material for the purpose of numerical calculations is taken as cadmium selenide (CdSe) having hexagonal symmetry (6 mm class) and belongs to the class of transversely isotropic material. The physical data for a single crystal of CdSe material is given below [28].

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The value of thermal relaxation time parameter has been estimated from the relation, see Chandrasekharaiah [7]. We have taken for computation purpose. The computations are carried out for single value of time at. The complex characteristic equation formed by the Relations (21), being, in general of the form, can be solved for ‘r’ with the help of DesCartes procedure [27] along with irreducible case of Cardano’s method for fixed values of p and q. These are used to obtain temperature change (T), normal stress, shear stress and electric potential in the relevant relations. The numerical technique outlined in the Section 5 has been used to invert the Laplace and Fourier transforms. A FORTRAN code is developed and executed to compute various considered field functions due to two different types of strip thermal loads namely, temperature input (TI) and temperature gradient (TG) acting at the rigidly fixed, open circuit (OC) boundary of the piezothermoelastic halfspace. These computer simulated quantities are plotted in the Figures 2 to 9. The curves without ball, with solid ball and hollow ball correspond to LS, GL and CT theories of thermoelasticity, respecttively. The variations of temperature change (T), normal stress, shear stress, and electric potential with respect to epicentral distance due to strip of impact or continuous temperature input (TI) has been presented in the Figures 2 to 5 and due to temperature gradient (TG) in the Figures 6 to 9 on linear scales in the context of LS, CT and GL theories of thermoelasticity.

Figure 2 reveals that the profiles of temperature change due to continuous or impact temperature input (TI) have maximum value in the vicinity of the load. The temperature change start decreasing with increasing epicentral distance and ultimately die out at certain values of epicentral distance, which ascertain

Figure 2. Variation of temperature change with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature input.

Figure 3. Variation of normal stress with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature input.

Figure 4. Variation of shear stress with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature input.

Figure 5. Variation of electric potential with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature input.

Figure 6. Variation of temperature change with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature gradient.

Figure 7. Variation of normal stress with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature gradient.

Figure 8. Variation of shear stress with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature gradient.

Figure 9. Variation of electrical potential with epicentral distance due to continuous and impact temperature gradient.

the existence of wave-front and finite speed of heat propagation. It is also revealed that the magnitude of temperature change due to impact TI is signifycantly large as compared to that for continuous one. The various curves are quite distinguishable due to significant effect of thermal relaxation time. It is also observed that temperature change has a non-zero value only in a particular region of the halfspace and outside that region its values almost vanish identically which means that no thermal disturbance can be felt outside that particular region. On comparing the results of temperature change for three different theories of thermoelasticity, it is observed that for both impact and continuous load.

It is observed from Figure 3 that magnitude of normal stress increases initially, attains maximum value and then decreases slowly to ultimately become asymptotically close to zero for, which again conforms the existence of wave fronts. This phenomenon is attributed to compression and expansion of the molecules of the solid due to application of the load. Initially, the internal friction due to application of temperature input at OC boundary increases which results in increase in the magnitude of normal stress followed by a rapid decay in the magnitude of normal stress due to decrease of internal friction. It is also observed that profiles of normal stress are clearly distinguishable due to signifycant effect of thermal relaxation times. The normal stress for three different theories of thermoelasticity follows the trend for both impact and continuous load.

Figure 4 shows the variation of shear stress with epicentral distance in the context of GL, LS and CT theories of thermoelasticity. It is observed that shear stress devolvement due to continuous TI is comparatively small to that of impact temperature input (TI). The amplitude of vibrations gets suppressed due to increase in the internal friction among the molecules of the solid as we move away from vicinity of the load. Shear stress dies out in an oscillating fashion as we move away from vicinity of the load. However, the shear stress devolvement is very small as compared to the vertical stress which is consistent with the boundary conditions. Shear stress shows the trend for in case of continuous load.

Figure 5 represents the variations of electric potential with epicentral distance due continuous or impact temperature input (TI) acting on the OC boundary of the halfspace. Its magnitude is noticed to be signifycantly large near the source and decreases as we move away from the vicinity of the source. The magnitude of electric potential is significantly small for continuous TI as compared to that produced by the action of impact TI on the surface of the considered solid. The effect of thermal relaxation time is quite significant as the profiles are distinguishable with each other. And the magnitude of electric potential follows the trend in case of continuous load.

Figure 6 shows the variation of absolute temperature change in the context of GL, LS and CT theories of thermoelasticity shows that due to the application of continuous/impact TG load applied at the boundary. Behavior of the profiles is noticed to be almost similar as that in Figure 3 with the exception that its magnitude is quite small in case of TG loading. The magnitude of temperature change decreases with epicentral distance and observes oscillating behavior to vanish at certain value of epicentral distance. Oscillating behavior of the temperature change is attributed to compression and expansion of the molecules of the solid due to application of the TG load. The effect of thermal relaxation time is also significant and it results in the decreasing magnitude of temperature change. Figure 7 shows that the profiles of normal stress in the context of GL, LS and CT theories of thermoelasticity are quite distinguishable due to the effect of thermal relaxation time and follow the trend for continuous load. Initially, the magnitude of normal stress increases in the domain to achieve maximum value at because of less internal friction among the molecules of the solid in this range. After that it starts decreasing due to increase in the internal friction of the molecules of the solid and finally dies out oscillating behavior to die out at certain value of epicenetral distance due to compression and expansion of the molecules.

Figure 8 shows that shear stress follows the oscillatory behavior with varying amplitude in the context of GL, LS and CT theories of thermoelasticity due to continuous/impact temperature gradient (TG) applied on rigidly fixed and OC boundary. Shear stress shows the trend for and for in case of continuous load. The effect of thermal relaxation time is also quite pertinent on the shear stress. The shear stress has maximum magnitude near the vicinity of the load which decreases and ultimately dies out in an oscillating fashion with increasing epicentral distance. The shear stress development is very small as compared to the normal stress. It means that most of the thermal energy is carried in the form of vertical stress waves and meager amount propagate in the form of shear stress, which is consistent with the boundary conditions. Figure 9 shows that plots the variation of electric potential with epicentral distance in context of GL, LS and CT theories of thermoelasticity due to strip continuous temperature gradient (TG) follows the trend for and for. It is also observed that electric potential development in case of TG input is less as compared to that of TI on the same surface. The effect of thermal relaxation time is significantly large because the various profiles of electric potential are clearly distinguishable.

The comparison of Figures 2-9 reveals that the magnitude of temperature change and electric potential interlace according as in case of TI load and these trends get reversed for TG load with the exception that the variation of electric potential follows the trend periodically in the latter case. The variations of vertical and shear stresses follow the inequalities for TI load and for TG load except that the inequalities get reversed for shear stress in the latter case.

7. Concluding Remarks

The present analysis and the used values of parameters lead to following conclusions:

1) All the considered field parameters are noticed to be quite large near the vicinity of thermal sources and decrease with increasing epicentral distance to ultimately vanish at certain value of epicentral distance under both types of impact or continuous thermal loads (TI/TG). This ascertained the existence of wave fronts and hence finite speed of heat propagation.

2) The profiles of temperature change with epicentral distance show that this quantity has a non-zero value in certain region of the halfspace and almost identically zero outside that region. This means that no thermal disturbance is felt outside this particular region. Similar behavior is also noticed from the profiles of the other considered functions viz. stresses and electric displacement.

3) Significant effect of thermal relaxation times has been observed on the profiles of various considered functions in the CdSe material because all the profiles of considered functions are quite distinguishable. Hence the results for all the considered field parameters show the difference between the three different theories of thermoelasticity namely CT, LS and GL.

4) It is also observed that the magnitude of all the field functions due to impact thermal loads are quite large as compared to that in case of continuous one almost at a particular epicentral distance.

5) The shear stress development is very small as compared to the vertical stress for both types of thermal loads. It means that in addition to thermal wave, vertical stress wave carries the major portion of energy and meager amount propagate in the form of shear stress wave, which is consistent with the boundary conditions.

6) The temperature change and electric potential interlace according to the inequalities

for TI load and these trends get reversed for TG load with periodic variations in case of electric potential in the latter case.

7) The magnitudes of vertical and shear stresses obey the inequalities for TI load and for TG load with some variations in the magnitude of shear stress in the latter case.

8. Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the reviewers for their useful suggestions for the improvement of this work. The author (JNS) is also thankful to The CSIR New Delhi for providing financial assistance via scheme No. 25(0184) EMR-II.

9. REFERENCES

  1. F. Ashida, T. R Tauchert and N. Noda, “Intelligent Structures for Aerospace: A Technology Overview and Assessment,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1689- 1700. doi:10.2514/3.12161
  2. F. Ashida and T. R. Tauchert, “Transient Response of a Piezothermoelastics Circular Disc under Axisymmetric Heating,” Acta Mechanica, Vol. 128, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1007/BF01463155
  3. Y. Shindo, K. Watanabe and F. Narita, “Electroelastic Analysis of a Piezoelectric Ceramic Strip with a Central Crack,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-19. doi:10.1016/S0020-7225(99)00015-4
  4. J. Duhamel, “Second Memoire Sur Les Phenomenon Thermo-Mechanique,” Journal de l'Ecole Polytechnique, Vol. 15, 1937, pp. 1-15.
  5. H. W Lord and Y. Shulmann, “A Generalized Dynamical Theory of Thermoelasticity,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1967, pp. 299-309. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(67)90024-5
  6. A. E. Green and K. E. Lindasy, “Thermoelasticity,” Journal of Elasticity, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1972, pp. 1-7. doi:10.1007/BF00045689
  7. D. S. Chandrasekharaiah, “Thermoelasticity with Second Sound — A Review,” Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1986, pp. 355-376. doi:10.1115/1.3143705
  8. C. C. Ackerman, B. Bentman, H. A. Fairbank and R. A. Krumhansal, “Second Sound in Solid Helium,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 16, 1966, pp. 789-791. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.789
  9. C. C. Ackerman and W. C. Overtone, “Second Sound in Solid Helium, 3,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 22, No. 15, 1969, pp. 764-766. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.764
  10. R. A. Guyer and J. A. Krumhansl, “Thermal Conductivity, Second Sound and Phononhydrodynamic Phenomena in Nonmetallic Crystals,” Physical Review, Vol. 148, No. 2, 1966, 778-788. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.148.778
  11. A. E. Green and P. M. Nagdhi, “A Re-Examination of the Basic Postulates of Thermodynamics,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, London, Vol. 432, 1991, pp. 171- 194. doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0012
  12. A. E. Green and K. E. Lindsay, “On Undamped Heat Waves in an Elastic Solid,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1992, pp. 252-264. doi:10.1080/01495739208946136
  13. A. E. Green and P. M. Nagdhi, “Thermoelasticity without Energy Dissipation,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1993, pp. 189-208.
  14. K. S. Hrinath, “Surface Point Source in Generalized Thermoelastic Half Space,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 8, 1975, pp. 1347-1351.
  15. K. S. Hrinath, “Surface Line Source in Generalized TherMoelastic Half Space,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 11, 1980, pp. 1210-1216.
  16. M. C. Majhi, “Discontinuities in Generalized Thermoelastic Wave Propagation in a Semi-Infinite Piezoelectric Rod,” Journal of Technical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1995, pp. 269-278.
  17. W. Nowacki, “Some General Theorems of Thermo-Piezoelectricity,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 1, 1978, pp. 171-182. doi:10.1080/01495737808926940
  18. W. Nowacki, “Foundations of Linear Piezoelectricity,” In: H. Parkus; Ed., Electromagnetic Interactions in Elastic Solids, Springer Verlag, Vienna, 1979.
  19. D. S. Chandrasekhariah, “A Temperature Rate Dependent Theory of Piezoelectricity,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 7, 1984, pp. 293-306. doi:10.1080/01495738408942213
  20. D. S. Chandrasekhariah, “Generalized Linear Thermoelasticity Theory of Piezoelectric Media,” Acta Mechanica, Vol. 71, No. 1-4, 1988, pp. 39-49. doi:10.1007/BF01173936
  21. L. Honig and R. S. Dhaliwal, “Thermal Shock Problem in Generalized Thermoelastic Halfspace,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 27, 1996, pp. 85-101.
  22. O. P. Niraula and N. Noda, “Thermal Stresses Analysis of Piezothermoelastic Strip with an Edge Crack,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 25, 2002, pp. 389-405. doi:10.1080/014957302753505031
  23. O. P. Niraula and N. Noda, “The Analysis of Thermal Stresses in Thermo-Piezoelastic Semi-Infinite Body with an Edge Crack,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 72, No. 2-3, 2002, pp. 119-126. doi:10.1007/s00419-002-0204-2
  24. J. N. Sharma and V. Kumar, “Plane Strain Problems of Transversely Isotropic Thermoelastic Media”, Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 20, 1997, pp. 463-476. doi:10.1080/01495739708956113
  25. J. N. Sharma, A. D. Thakur and Y. D. Sharma, “Diturbance Due to Periodic Thermal Load in a Piezothermoelastic Half-Space,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2009, pp. 607-629. doi:10.1142/S1758825109000320
  26. M. Aouadi, “Electromagneto-Thermoelastic Fundamental Solutions in a Two-Dimensional Problem for Short Time,” Acta Mechanica, Vol. 174, 2005, 223-240. doi:10.1007/s00707-004-0201-3
  27. J. N. Sharma, “Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists,” 2nd Edition, Alpha Science International Ltd., Oxford, Narosa Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2007.
  28. J. N. Sharma and V. Walia, “Straight and Circular Crested Lamb Waves in Generalized Piezothermoelastic Plates,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 29, 2006, pp. 529-551. doi:10.1080/01495730500373552
  29. D. V. Strunin, “On Characteristics Times in Generalized Thermoelasticity,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 68, No. 5, 2001, pp. 816-817. doi:10.1115/1.1386696
  30. R. V. Churchill, “Operational Mathematics,” 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd., Tokyo, 1972.
  31. J. N. Sharma and K. Singh, “Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists,” 2nd Edition, Alpha Science International Ltd., Oxford, Narosa Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2009.
  32. G. Honig, and U. Hirdes, “A Method for the Numerical Inversion of the Laplace Transform,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1984, pp. 113-132. doi:10.1016/0377-0427(84)90075-X
  33. B. Bradie “A Friendly Introduction to Numerical Analysis,” Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, New Delhi, 2007.
  34. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN,” 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

Appendix

The coefficients, in Equation (20) and, in equation (21) are obtained as

(A.1)

(A.2)

(A.3)

(A.4)

(A.5)

(A.6)

(A.7)

(A.8)

(A.9)

(A.10)

where

(A.11)

(A.12)

Nomenclature

= Mass density

= Specific heat at constant strain

= Thermoelastic coupling constant

= Characteristic frequency

= Piezothermoelastic coupling constant

= Thermal conductivity along orthogonal to the axis of symmetry

= Thermal conductivity along the axis of symmetry

= Elastic parameters

= Piezoelectric constants

= Electric permittivity perpendicular to the axis of symmetry

= Electric permittivity along the axis of symmetry

= Pyroelectric constant

= Stresses

= Electrical displacement

= Electric potential

= Temperature change

= Kronecker’s delta

, Longitudinal wave velocity in the medium

, Displacement vector