﻿Periodicity and Solution of Rational Recurrence Relation of Order Six

Applied Mathematics
Vol. 3  No. 7 (2012) , Article ID: 19882 , 5 pages DOI:10.4236/am.2012.37107

Periodicity and Solution of Rational Recurrence Relation of Order Six

Tarek F. Ibrahim1,2

1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts (S. A.), King Khalid University, Abha, KSA

2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Email: tfibrahem@mans.edu.eg

Received April 27, 2012; revised May 27, 2012; accepted June 3, 2012

Keywords: Difference Equation; Solutions; Periodicity; Local Stability

ABSTRACT

Difference equations or discrete dynamical systems is diverse field whose impact almost every branch of pure and applied mathematics. Every dynamical system determines a difference equation and vise versa. We obtain in this paper the solution and periodicity of the following difference equation.

where the initial conditions and are arbitrary real numbers with and not equal to be zero. On the other hand, we will study the local stability of the solutions of Equation (1). Moreover, we give graphically the behavior of some numerical examples for this difference equation with some initial conditions.

1. Introduction

Difference equations or discrete dynamical systems is diverse field whose impact almost every branch of pure and applied mathematics. Every dynamical system determines a difference equation and vise versa. Recently, there has been great interest in studying difference equations. One of the reasons for this is a necessity for some techniques whose can be used in investigating equations arising in mathematical models decribing real life situations in population biology, economic, probability theory, genetics, psychology, ...etc. Difference equations usually describe the evolution of certain phenomenta over the course of time. Recently there are a lot of interest in studying the global attractivity, boundedness character the periodic nature, and giving the solution of nonlinear difference equations. Recently there has been a lot of interest in studying the boundedness character and the periodic nature of nonlinear difference equations. Difference equations have been studied in various branches of mathematics for a long time. First results in qualitative theory of such systems were obtained by Poincaré and Perron in the end of nineteenth and the beginning of twentieth centuries. For some results in this area, see for example [1-13].

Although difference equations are sometimes very simple in their forms, they are extremely difficult to understand throughly the behavior of their solutions.

Many researchers have investigated the behavior of the solution of difference equations for examples.

Cinar [1,2] investigated the solutions of the following difference equations

Karatas et al. [4] gave that the solution of the difference equation

G. Ladas, M. Kulenovic et al. [12] have studied period two solutions of the difference equation

Simsek et al. [13] obtained the solution of the difference equation

Ibrahim [5] studied the third order rational difference Equation

In this paper we obtain the solution and study the periodicity of the following difference equation

, (1)

where the initial conditions , and are arbitrary real numbers with, and not equal to be zero. On the other hand, we will study the local stability of the solutions of Equation (1). Moreover, we give graphically the behavior of some numerical examples for this difference equation with some initial conditions.

Here, we recall some notations and results which will be useful in our investigation.

Let I be some interval of real numbers and Let be a continuously differentiable function. Then for every set of initial conditions , the difference equation

(2)

has a unique solution [11].

Definition (1.1) A point is called an equilibrium point of Equation (2) if

That is, for, is a solution of Equation (2), or equivalently, is a fixed point of F.

Definition (1.2) The difference Equation (2) is said to be persistence if there exist numbers m and M with 0 < m ≤ M < ∞ such that for any initial there exists a positive integer N which depends on the initial conditions such that m ≤ xn ≤ M for all n ≥ N.

Definition (1.3) (Stability)

Let I be some interval of real numbers.

1) The equilibrium point of Equation (2) is locally stable if for every ε > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that for with

we have for all n ≥ −k.

2) The equilibrium point of Equation (2) is locally asymptotically stable if is locally stable solution of Equation (2) and there exists γ > 0, such that for all with

we have

3) The equilibrium point of Equation (2) is global attractor if for all, we have

4) The equilibrium point of Equation (2) is globally asymptotically stable if is locally stable, and is also a global attractor of Equation (2).

5) The equilibrium point of Equation (2) is unstable if not locally stable.

The linearized equation of Equation (2) about the equilibrium is the linear difference equation

Theorem (1.4) [10] Assume that (real numbers) and Then

is a sufficient condition for the asymptotic stability of the difference equation

Remark (1.5) Theorem (1.4) can be easily extended to a general linear equations of the form

where (real numbers) and. Then Equation (4) is asymptotically stable provided that

.

Definition (1.6) (Periodicity)

A sequence is said to be periodic with period p if for all n ≥ −k.

2. Solution and Periodicity

In this section we give a specific form of the solutions of the difference Equation (1).

Theorem (2.1)

Let be a solution of Equation (1). Then Equation (1) have all solutions and the solutions are

where.

Proof:

For n = 0 the result holds. Now suppose that n > 0 and that our assumption holds for n − 1. We shall show that the result holds for n. By using our assumption for n − 1, we have the following:

Now, it follows from Equation (1) that

similarly we can derive,

Thus, the proof is completed.

Theorem (2.2)

Suppose that be a solution of Equation (1). Then all solutions of Equation (1) are periodic with period fourteen.

Proof:

From Equation (1), we see that

which completes the proof.

3. Stability of Solutions

In this section we study the local stability of the solutions of Equation (1).

Lemma (3.1)

Equation (1) have two equilibrium points which are 0 and 1.

Proof:

For the equilibrium points of Equation (1), we can write

Then, i.e.

Thus the equilibrium points of Equation (1) is are 0 and 1.

Theorem (3.2)

The equilibrium points and are unstable.

Proof:

We will prove the theorem at the equilibrium point and the proof at the equilibrium point by the same way.

Let be a continuous function defined by

Therefore it follows that

At the equilibrium point we have

, ,

, ,

,

Then the linearized equation of Equation (1) about is

i.e.

Whose characteristic equation is

By the generalization of theorem (1.4) we have

which is impossible. This means that the equilibrium point is unstable. Similarly, we can see that the equilibrium point is unstable.

4. Numerical Examples

For confirming the results of this section, we consider numerical examples which represent different types of solutions to Equation (1).

Example 4.1

Consider x−5 = 1, x−4 = 2, x−3 = 4, x−2 = −1, x−1 = −2, and x0 = 7. See Figure 1.

Example 4.2

Consider x−5 = 1, x−4 = −1, x−3 = 2, x−2 = −6, x−1 = 5, and x0 = −4. See Figure 2.

Example 4.3

Consider x−5 = 3, x−4 = 5, x−3 = −7, x−2 = −3, x−1 = 2, and x0 = −1. See Figure 3.

Example 4.4

Consider x−5 = −4, x−4 = 3, x−3 = −2, x−2 = 9, x−1 = 17,

Figure 1. The periodicity of solutions with period 14 with unstable equilibrium points = 1 and = 0.

Figure 2. Periodicity of solutions with period 14 with unstable equilibrium points = 1, = 0.

Figure 3. Periodicity of solutions with period 14 with unstable equilibrium points = 1 and = 0.

Figure 4. The periodicity of solutions with period 14 with unstable equilibrium points = 1, = 0.

and x0 = −6. See Figure 4.

5. Acknowledgements

We want to thank the referee for his useful suggestions.

REFERENCES

1. C. Cinar, “On the Positive Solutions of the Difference Equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 158, No. 3, 2004, pp. 793-797. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.139
2. C. Cinar, “On the Positive Solutions of the Difference Equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 156, No. 2, 2004, pp. 587-590. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.010
3. S. N. Elaydi, “An Introduction to Difference Equations,” Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 1996.
4. R. Karatas, C. Cinar and D. Simsek, “On Positive Solutions of the Difference Equation,” International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 10, 2006, pp. 495-500.
5. T. F. Ibrahim, “On the Third Order Rational Difference Equation,” International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 27, 2009, pp. 1321-1334.
6. T. F. Ibrahim, “Global Asymptotic Stability of a Nonlinear Difference Equation with Constant Coefficients,” Mathematical Modelling and Applied Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009.
7. T. F. Ibrahim, “Dynamics of a Rational Recursive Sequence of Order Two,” International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 5, No. D09, 2009, pp. 98- 105.
8. T. F. Ibrahim, “Solvability and Attractivity of the Solutions of a Rational Difference Equation,” Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics: Advances and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2009, pp. 227-237.
9. T. F. Ibrahim, “Periodicity and Analytic Solution of a Recursive Sequence with Numerical Examples,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2009, pp. 701-708.
10. V. L. Kocic and G. Ladas, “Global Behavior of Nonlinear Difference Equations of Higher Order with Applications,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.
11. M. R. S. Kulenovic and G. Ladas, “Dynamics of Second Order Rational Difference Equations with Open Problems and Conjectures,” Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001. doi:10.1201/9781420035384
12. G. Ladas and M. Kulenovic, “On Period Two Solutions of,” Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, Vol. 6, 2000, pp. 641-646.
13. D. Simsek, C. Cinar and I. Yalcinkaya, “On the Recursive Sequence,” International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 10, 2006, pp. 475-480.