Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.2 No.6(2012), Article ID:24369,4 pages DOI:10.4236/apm.2012.26059
The p.q.-Baer Property of Fixed Rings under Finite Group Action
Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Yanbian University, Yanji, China
Email: *hljin98@ybu.edu.cn, hljin98@hanmail.net
Received August 21, 2012; revised September 30, 2012; accepted October 8, 2012
Keywords: p.q.-Baer Property; Fixed Ring; Group Action
ABSTRACT
A ring R is called right principally quasi-Baer (simply, right p.q.-Baer) if the right annihilator of every principal right ideal of R is generated by an idempotent. For a ring R, let G be a finite group of ring automorphisms of R. We denote the fixed ring of R under G by RG. In this work, we investigated the right p.q.-Baer property of fixed rings under finite group action. Assume that R is a semiprime ring with a finite group G of X-outer ring automorphisms of R. Then we show that: 1) If R is G-p.q.-Baer, then RG is p.q.-Baer; 2) If R is p.q.-Baer, then RG are p.q.-Baer.
1. Introduction
Throughout this paper all rings are associative with identity. Recall from [1] that a ring R is called right principally quasi-Baer (simply, right p.q.-Baer) if the right annihilator of every principal right ideal of R is generated, as a right ideal, by an idempotent of R. A left principally quasi-Baer (simply, left p.q.-Baer) ring is defined similarly. Right p.q.-Baer rings have been initially studied in [1]. For more details on (right) p.q.-Baer rings, see [1-6].
Recall from [7] (see also [8]) that a ring R is called quasi-Baer if the right annihilator of every right ideal is generated, as a right ideal, by an idempotent of R. A ring R is called biregular if for each,
for some central idempotent
. We note that the class of right p.q.-Baer rings is a generalization of the classes of quasi-Baer rings and biregular rings.
For a ring R, we use to denote a fixed maximal right ring of quotients of R. According to [9] an idempotent
of a ring
is called left (resp., right) semicentral if
(resp.,
) for all
. Equivalently, an idempotent
is left (resp., right) semicentral if and only if eR (resp.,
) is a two-sided ideal of R. For a ring R, we let
(resp.,
) denote the set of all left (resp., right) semicentral idempotents. An idempotent
of a ring
is called semicentral reduced if
. Recall from [2] that a ring R is called semicentral reduced if
, i.e., 1 is a semicentral reduced idempotent of R.
For a nonempty subset X of a ring R, we use and
to denote the right annihilator and the left annihilator of X in R, respectively. If R is a semiprime ring and I is a two-sided ideal of R, then
. For a right R-module
and a submodule N of M, we use
and
to denote that
is essential in
and
is dense in
, respectively.
For a ring R, we let denote the group of ring automorphisms of R. Let
be a subgroup of
. For
and
, we let
denote the image of r under g. We use
to denote the fixed ring of R under G, that is
.
We begin with the following example.
2. Preliminary
Example 2.1. There exist a ring R and a finite group G of ring automorphisms of R such that R is right p.q.-Baer but RG is not right p.q.-Baer. Let with a field F of characteristic 2. Then R is right p.q.-Baer. Define
by
Then since the characteristic of F is 2.
Now we show that RG is not right p.q.-Baer. The fixed ring under G is
By computation we see that the idempotents of RG are only 0 and 1, thus RG is semicentral reduced. So if RG is right p.q.-Baer, then RG is a prime ring by [2, Lemma 4.2], a contradiction. Thus RG is not right p.q.-Baer.Also we can see that RG is not left p.q.-Baer.
Definition 2.2. Let R be a semiprime ring. For , let
where
is the Martindale right ring of quotients of R (see [10] for more on
). We say that
is Xouter if
. A subgroup G of
is called Xouter on R if every
is X-outer. Assume that R is a semiprime ring, then for
, let
.
For, we claim that
. Obviously
. Conversely, if
then
. There exists
such that
. Therefore
,
, and
. Thus
, hence
. Therefore
. So if G is X-outer on R, then G can be considered as a group of ring automorph-ismms of
and G is X-outer on
. For more details for X-outer ring automorphisms of a ring, etc., see [10, p. 396] and [11].
We say that a ring R has no nonzero n-torsion (n is a positive integer) if with
implies
.
Lemma 2.3. [12,13]
Let R be a semiprime ring and G a group of ring automorphisms of R. If is semiprime, then
is semiprime.
For a ring R, we use to denote the center of R.
Lemma 2.4. For a semiprime ring R, let G be a group of X-outer ring automorphisms of R.
Then.
Proof.
Let with
, 1 the identity of G, and
.
The for all
. So
,
, ···,
for all
. Since G is X-outer, it follows that
. Hence
. Also since
for all
, we have that
.
Note that for all,
implies
. So
. Thus
.
Conversely, is clear.
Therefore.
Lemma 2.5. [14] Assume that R is a semiprime ring and G is a finite group of X-outer ring automorphisms of R. Then.
Lemma 2.6. Assume that R is a semiprime ring and. Let
be a two-sided ideal of R such that
and
with
. Then
.
Proof. Since R is semiprime,
. Thus
. As
,
. We note that e and
are in
. So we have that
.
Lemma 2.7. [15] Let R be a semiprime ring with a finite group G of X-outer ring automorphisms of R.
1) For, let I be a dense right ideal I of RG such that
. Then IR is a dense right ideal of R and the map
defined by
, with
and
, is a right R-homomorphism. Moreover
.
2) The map defined by
is a ring isomorphism.
3) Let and K a dense right ideal of R such that
. Then
is a dense right ideal of RG
and, where
is the restriction of
to RG. Thus
.
For a ring R with a group G of ring automorphism of R, we say that a right ideal I of R is G-invariant if for every
, where
.
Proposition 2.8. [1] Let R be a semiprime ring. Then the followings are equivalent.
1) R is right p.q.-Baer;
2) Every principal two-sided ideal of R is right essential in a ring direct summand of R;
3) Every finitely generated two-sided ideal of R is right essential in a ring direct summand of R;
4) Every principal two-sided ideal of R that is closed as a right ideal is a direct summand of R;
5) For every principal two-sided ideal I of R, is right essential in a direct summand of R;
6) R is left p.q.-Baer.
For a ring R with a group G of ring automorphisms of R, we say that a right ideal I of R is G-invariant if for every
, where
. Assume that R is a semiprime ring with a group G of ring automorphisms of R. We say that R is G-p.q.-Baer if the right annihilator of every finitely generated G-invariant two-sided ideal is generated by an idempotent, as a right ideal. By Proposition 8, if a ring R is semiprime p.q.- Baer with a group G of ring automorphisms of R, then R is G-p.q.-Baer.
A ring R is called right Rickart if the right annihilator of each element is generated by an idempotent of R. A left Rickart ring is defined similarly. A ring R is called Rickart if R is both right and left Rickart. A ring R is said to be reduced if R has no nonzero nilpotent element. We note that reduced Rickart rings are p.q.-Baer rings.
We put
Let be the subring of
generated by R and
.
Lemma 2.9. [16] Assume that R is a semiprime ring. Then:
1) The ring is the smallest right ring of quotients of
which is p.q.-Baer;
2) R is p.q.-Baer if and only if.
With these preparations, in spite of Example 1, we have the following result for p.q.-Baer property of RG on a semiprime ring R for the case when G is finite and X-outer.
3. Main Results
Theorem 3.1. Let R be a semiprime ring with a finite group G of X-outer ring automorphisms of R. Then:
1) If R is G-p.q.-Baer, then RG is p.q.-Baer.
2) If R is reduced G-p.q.-Baer, then RG is Rickart.
Proof. 1) Assume that R is G-p.q.-Baer. To show that RG is p.q.-Baer, it is enough to see that by Lemma 9 since RG is semiprime from Lemma 3. Let
. Then
, so
by Lemma 7. From Lemma 9, there exists
such that
because
. Note that
.
We show that. To see this, say
with
. Then
. So there exists
such that
. Hence
.
Observe that, as RG is semiprime from Lemma 3. So
is a dense right ideal of RG since RG is semiprime. By Lemma 7,
is a dense right ideal of
. So it is essential in
. Hence
.
We claim that.
First note that. For the claim, it is enough to show that
. Take
with
. Then there exists
such that
. Say
, where
and
.
Then.
Put with
and
. Then
. In this case,
for all i. To see this, assume on the contrary that there is
such that
. Note that
.
Thus there exists such that
because
.
Also because
. Therefore we have that
, a contradiction. Thus
for all i, so
. Hence
. Now since
, write
with
and
. Then
because
. So
. Therefore
. Note that
by Lemma 5. Therefore
Hence.
As RaR is a G-invariant two-sided ideal of R and R is R-p.q.-Baer, there is such that
. From [9],
. As
and
, it follows that
by Lemma 6, so
.
Therefore, and thus
.
So, and hence RG is p.q.-Baer by Lemma 9.
2) We recall that a reduced p.q.-Baer ring is Rickart. Thus if R is reduced G-p.q.-Baer, then RG is Rickart from 1).
4. Conclusion
In [14], the quasi-Baer property of fixed rings under finite group actions on a semiprime ring and their applications to C*-algebras have been studied (see also [17,18]). Motivated by investigations in [14], in this paper we investigate the right p.q.-Baer property of fixed rings under finite group actions on a given semiprime ring. Assume that R is a semiprime ring with a finite group G of X-outer ring automorphisms of R. Then we show that if R is G-p.q.-Baer, then RG is p.q.-Baer. Thus if R is a semiprime p.q.-Baer ring with finite group G of X-outer ring automorphisms of R, then RG is p.q.-Baer.
REFERENCES
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, “Principally Quasi-Baer Rings,” Communications in Algebra, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2001, pp. 639-660. doi:10.1081/AGB-100001530
- G. F. Birkenmeier, H. E. Heatherly, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, “Triangular Matrix Representations,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 230, No. 2, 2000, pp. 558-595. doi:10.1006/jabr.2000.8328
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, “Quasi-Baer Ring Extensions and Biregular Rings,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2000, pp. 39-52. doi:10.1017/S0004972700022000
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, “A Sheaf Representation of Quasi-Baer Rings,” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Vol. 146, No. 3, 2000, pp. 209-223. doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(99)00164-4
- G. F. Birkenmeier and J. K. Park, “Triangular Matrix Representations of Ring Extensions,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 265, No. 2, 2003, pp. 457-477. doi:10.1016/S0021-8693(03)00155-8
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, “Polynomial Extensions of Baer and Quasi-Baer Rings,” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Vol. 159, No. 1, 2001, pp. 25- 42. doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(00)00055-4
- W. E. Clark, “Twisted Matrix Units Semigroup Algebras,” Duke Mathematical Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1967, pp. 417-423. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-67-03446-1
- A. Pollingher and A. Zaks, “On Baer and Quasi-Baer Rings,” Duke Mathematical Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1970, pp. 127-138. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-70-03718-X
- G. F. Birkenmeier, “Idempotents and Completely Semiprime Ideals,” Communications in Algebra, Vol. 11, No. 6, 1983, pp. 567-580. doi:10.1080/00927878308822865
- T. Y. Lam, “Lectures on Modules and Rings,” Springer, Berlin, 1998.
- J. W. Fisher and S. Montgomery, “Semiprime Skew Group Rings,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 52, No. 1, 1978, pp. 241-247. doi:10.1016/0021-8693(78)90272-7
- M. Cohen, “Morita Context Related to Finite Automorphism Groups of Rings,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1982, pp. 37-54.
- S. Montgomery, “Outer Automorphisms of Semi-Prime Rings,” Journal London Mathematical Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1978, pp. 209-220. doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-18.2.209
- H. L. Jin, J. Doh and J. K. Park, “Group Actions on Quasi-Baer Rings,” Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, Vol. 52, 2009, pp. 564-582. doi:10.4153/CMB-2009-057-6
- J. Osterburg and J. K. Park, “Morita Contexts and Quotient Rings of Fixed Rings,” Houston Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 10, 1984, pp. 75-80.
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. K. Park and S. T. Rizvi, “Principally Quasi-Baer Ring Hulls,” Advances in Ring Theory, 2010, pp. 47-61. doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0286-0_4
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. K. Park and S. T. Rizvi, “Hulls of Semiprime Rings with Applications to C∗-Algebras,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 322, No. 2, 2009, pp. 327-352. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.03.036
- G. F. Birkenmeier, J. K. Park and S. T. Rizvi, “The Structure of Rings of Quotients,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 321, No. 9, 2009, pp. 2545-2566. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.02.013
NOTES
*Corresponding author.