﻿Some Results on Generalized Degree Distance

Open Journal of Discrete Mathematics
Vol.3 No.3(2013), Article ID:34512,8 pages DOI:10.4236/ojdm.2013.33026

Some Results on Generalized Degree Distance

Asma Hamzeh, Ali Iranmanesh*, Samaneh Hossein-Zadeh

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Email: *iranmanesh@modares.ac.ir

Copyright © 2013 Asma Hamzeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received January 14, 2013; revised February 15, 2013; accepted May 14, 2013

Keywords: Generalized Degree Distance; Cartesian Product; Join; Symmetric Difference; Composition; Disjunction

ABSTRACT

In [1], Hamzeh, Iranmanesh Hossein-Zadeh and M. V. Diudea recently introduced the generalized degree distance of graphs. In this paper, we present explicit formulas for this new graph invariant of the Cartesian product, composition, join, disjunction and symmetric difference of graphs and introduce generalized and modified generalized degree distance polynomials of graphs, such that their first derivatives at x = 1 are respectively, equal to the generalized degree distance and the modified generalized degree distance. These polynomials are related to Wiener-type invariant polynomial of graphs.

1. Introduction

A graph invariant is any function on a graph that does not depend on a labeling of its vertices. Topological indices and graph invariants based on the distances between the vertices of a graph are widely used in theoretical chemistry to establish relations between the structures and the properties of molecules. Topological indices provide correlations with physical, chemical and thermodynamic parameters of chemical compounds [2]. In this paper, we only consider simple and connected graphs. Let G be a graph on n vertices and edges. We denote the vertex and the edge set of G by and, respectively. As usual, the distance between the vertices and of G, denoted by (for short), is defined as the length of a minimum path connecting them. We let be the degree of a vertex in G. The eccentricity, denoted by, is defined as the maximum distance from vertex to any other vertex. The diameter of a graph G, denoted by, is the maximum eccentricity over all vertices in a graph G.

The Cartesian product of graphs G and H is a graph such that, and any two vertices and are adjacent in if and only if either and is adjacent to, or and is adjacent to, see [3] for details. Let and be two graphs with disjoint vertex sets and and edge sets and. The join is the graph union together with all the edges joining and. The composition is the graph with vertex set and is adjacent to whenever (is adjacent with) or (and is adjacent to), [3, p. 185]. The disjunction of graphs and is the graph with vertex set and is adjacent to whenever or. The symmetric difference of two graphs and is the graph with vertex set and

.

The first Zagreb index was originally defined as

[4]. The first Zagreb index can be also expressed as a sum over edges of,

We refer readers to [5]

for the proof of this fact and for more information on Zagreb index. The first Zagreb coindex of a graph is defined in [6] as:

Let be the number of pairs of vertices of a graph that are at distance, be a real numberand, that is called the Wienertype invariant of associated to, see [7,8] for details. Additively weighted Harary index is defined in [9] as

Dobrynin and Kochetova in [10] and Gutman in [11] introduced a new graph invariant with the name degree distance that is defined as follows:

In [12], the modified degree distance was defined as follows:

The generalized degree distance, denoted by, is defined as follows in [1].

For every vertex and real number, is defined by, where

. We then define

If, then. When, this new topological index is equal to the degree distance (or Schultz index). There are many papers for studying this topological index, for example see [13-16]. Also if, then Therefore the study of this new topological index is important and we try to obtain some new results related to this topological index. The modified generalized degree distance, denoted by, is defined in [1] as:

If, then.

We construct graph polynomials having the property such that their first derivatives at are equal to the generalized degree distance, the modified generalized degree distance and Wiener-type invariant respectively. These polynomials are defined as follows:

and

The Wiener index of the Cartesian product of graphs was studied in [17,18]. In [19], Klavžar, Rajapakse and Gutman computed the Szeged index of the Cartesian product of graphs. In [9,20-24], exact formulae for the hyper-Wiener, the first Zagreb index, the second Zagreb index and Schultz polynomials of some graph operations were computed.

Throughout this paper, and denote the cycle, path, complete graph and star on vertices. The complement of a graph is a graph on the same vertices such that two vertices of are adjacent if and only if they are not adjacent in. The graph is usually denoted by. Our other notations are standard and taken mainly from [2,25,26].

In this paper we present explicit formulas for of graph operations containing the Cartesian product, composition, join, disjunction and symmetric difference of graphs and introduce generalized and modified generalized degree distance polynomials of graphs, such that their first derivatives at are respectively, equal to the generalized degree distance and the modified generalized degree distance. These polynomials are related with Wiener-type invariant polynomial of graphs.

2. Main Results

The aim of this section is to compute the generalized degree distance for five graph operations. We start with a lemma which gives some information about the number of vertices and edges of operations on two arbitrary graphs. For a given graph, the number of vertices and edges will be denoted by and, respectively.

Lemma 2.1. [3,20] Let and be graphs. Then we have:

a)

and

b) The graph is connected if and only if and are connected.

c) If and are vertices of, then.

d) The Cartesian product, join, composition, disjunction and symmetric difference of graphs are associative and all of them are commutative except the composition of graphs.

e)

.

f)

g)

h)

i)

j)

k)

l)

m)

In Theorem 2.2, we give a formula for the generalized degree distance of the join of two graphs.

Theorem 2.2. Let and be two graphs. Then

Proof. It is obvious from definition that for any, the distance is either 1 or 2. In the formula for, we partition the set of pairs of vertices of into three subsets and. In we collect all pairs of vertices u and v such that u is in and v is in. Hence, they are adjacent in. The set is the set of pairs of vertices u and v which are in. Also we partition the sum in the formula of into three sums so that is over for. For we obtain

and

Similarly,

Therefore

Corollary 2.3. Let G be a connected graph with n vertices and m edges. Then

.

The exact formulas for the fan graph K1 + Pn and for the wheel graph are given in the following Corollary.

Corollary 2.4.

and

Remark 2.5. In the above theorem, if, then we obtain, which gives first derivatives formula Theorem 3 in [22] at.

In the next theorem we obtain the exact formula for the generalized degree distance of the composition of two graphs.

Theorem 2.6. Let and be two graphs. Then

Proof. Suppose and are two set of vertices of and, respectively. Then by Lemma 2.1 and definition of, we have:

So the proof of theorem is now completed. □

By composing paths and cycles with various small graphs we can obtain classes of polymer-like graphs. Now we give the formula of the index for the fence graph and the closed fence.

Corollary 2.7.

and

Remark 2.8. In Theorem 2.6, if, then we obtain, which gives first derivatives formula Theorem 5 in [22] at.

Now we prove the theorem that characterizes the generalized degree distance of the disjunction of two graphs.

Theorem 2.9. Let and be two graphs. Then

Proof. According to definition of, we have the following relations:

and

So we have:

This completes the proof. □

Now we prove the theorem that characterizes the generalized degree distance of the symmetric difference of two graphs.

Theorem 2.10. Let G1 and G2 be two graphs. Then

Proof. We consider four sums as follows:

similarly to

and

By the definition of, we have:

So the proof is now completed. □

In the next theorem we find the generalized degree distance of the Cartesian product of two graphs.

Theorem 2.11. Let and be two graphs. Then

Proof. Suppose and are two set of vertices of and, respectively. Then by Lemma 2.1 and definition of, we have:

So the proof is now completed. □

As an application of the above theorem, we list explicit formulae for the generalized degree distance of and. These graphs are known as the rectangular grid, the nanotube, and the nanotorus, respectively.

Lemma 2.12. Define. By [1,23], we have:

Corollary 2.13. By Theorem 2.9 and Lemma 2.12 we have:

and

Remark 2.14. In the above theorem, if, then we obtain, which gives first derivatives formula Theorem 1 in [22] at.

Now we obtain the relation between the generalized degree distance polynomial and Wiener-type invariant polynomial and the relation between the modified generalized degree distance polynomial and Wiener-type invariant polynomial for graphs.

Theorem 2.15. If is a graph with vertices and edges, then

Proof. By definition, we have

This completes the proof. □

Theorem 2.16. If is a graph with vertices and edges, then

Proof. By definition, we have

This completes the proof. □

REFERENCES

1. A. Hamzeh, A. Iranmanesh, S. Hossein-Zadeh and M. V. Diudea, “Generalized Degree Distance of Trees, Unicyclic and Bicyclic Graphs,” Studia Ubb Chemia, LVII, Vol. 4, 2012, pp. 73-85.
2. M. V. Diudea, I. Gutman and L. Jantschi, “Molecular Topology,” Nova Science, Huntington, 2001.
3. W. Imrich and S. Klavžar, “Product Graphs: Structure and Recognition,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
4. I. Gutman and N. Trinajstic, “Graph Theory and Molecular Orbitals. Total π-Electron Energy of Alternant Hydrocarbons,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1972, pp. 535-538. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(72)85099-1
5. S. Nikolic, G. Kovacevic, A. Milicevic and N. Trinajstic, “The Zagreb Indices 30 Years after,” Croatica Chemica Acta, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2003, pp. 113-124.
6. T. Došlic, “Vertex-Weighted Wiener Polynomials for Composite Graphs,” Ars Mathematica Contemporanea, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008, pp. 66-80.
7. I. Gutman, “A Property of the Wiener Number and Its Modifications,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 36A, No. 2, 1997, pp. 128-132.
8. I. Gutman, A. A. Dobrynin, S. Klavžar and L. Pavlovic, “Wiener-Type Invariants of Trees and Their Relation,” Bulletin of the Institute of Combinatorics and Its Applications, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2004, pp. 23-30.
9. Y. Alizadeh, A. Iranmanesh and T. Došlic, “Additively Weighted Harary Index of Some Composite Graphs,” Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 313, No. 1, 2013, pp. 26-34. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2012.09.011
10. A. A. Dobrynin and A. A. Kochetova, “Degree Distance of a Graph: A Degree Analogue of the Wiener Index,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1994, pp. 1082-1086. doi:10.1021/ci00021a008
11. I. Gutman, “Selected Properties of the Schultz Molecular Topological Index,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1994, pp. 1087-1089. doi:10.1021/ci00021a009
12. I. Gutman, and S. Klavžar, “Wiener Number of VertexWeighted Graphs and a Chemical Applications,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 80, No. 1, 1997, pp. 73-81. doi:10.1016/S0166-218X(97)00070-X
13. H. Hua and S. Zhang, “On the Reciprocal Degree Distance of Graphs,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 160, No. 7-8, 2012, pp. 1152-1163. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2011.11.032
14. S. Hossein-Zadeh, A. Hamzeh and A. R. Ashrafi, “Extremal Properties of Zagreb Coindices and Degree Distance of Graphs,” Miskolc Mathematical Notes, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2010, pp. 129-137.
15. I. Tomescu, “Unicyclic and Bicyclic Graphs Having Minimum Degree Distance,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 156, No. 1, 2008, pp. 125-130. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2007.09.010
16. I. Tomescu, “Some Extremal Properties of the Degree Distance of a Graph,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 98, No. 1-2, 1999, pp. 159-163. doi:10.1016/S0166-218X(99)00117-1
17. A. Graovac and T. Pisanski, “On the Wiener Index of a Graph,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, pp. 53-62. doi:10.1007/BF01166923
18. B. E. Sagan, Y.-N. Yeh and P. Zhang, “The Wiener Polynomial of a Graph,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 60, No. 5, 1996, pp. 959-969. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)60:5<959::AID-QUA2>3.0.CO;2-W
19. S. Klavžar, A. Rajapakse and I. Gutman, “The Szeged and the Wiener Index of Graphs,” Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1996, pp. 45-49. doi:10.1016/0893-9659(96)00071-7
20. M. H. Khalifeh, H. Yousefi-Azari and A. R. Ashrafi, “The Hyper-Wiener Index of Graph Operations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1402-1407. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.03.003
21. M. Eliasi and A. Iranmanesh, “The Hyper-Wiener Index of the Generalized Hierarchical Product of Graphs,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 159, No. 8, 2011, pp. 866-871. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2010.12.020
22. M. Eliasi and B. Taeri, “Schultz Polynomials of Composite Graphs,” Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2008, pp. 285-296. doi:10.2298/AADM0802285E
23. S. Hossein-Zadeh, A. Hamzeh and A. R. Ashrafi, “WienerType Invariants of Some Graph Operations,” Filomat, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 103-113. doi:10.2298/FIL0903103H
24. M. H. Khalifeh, H. Yousefi-Azari and A. R. Ashrafi, “The First and Second Zagreb Indices of Some Graph Operations,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 157, No. 4, 2009, pp. 804-811. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2008.06.015
25. F. Harary, “Graph Theory,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1969.
26. N. Trinajstic, “Chemical Graph Theory,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.