Open Access Library Journal
Vol.03 No.03(2016), Article ID:69061,4 pages
10.4236/oalib.1102453
Weak Insertion of a continuous function between Two Comparable α-Continuous (C-Continuous) Functions*
Majid Mirmiran
Department of Mathematics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Copyright © 2016 by author and OALib.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Received 18 February 2016; accepted 4 March 2016; published 9 March 2016
ABSTRACT
A sufficient condition in terms of lower cut sets is given for the insertion of a continuous function between two comparable real-valued functions.
Keywords:
Weak Insertion, Strong Binary relation, C-open Set, Semi-Preopen set, α-open Set, Lower Cut set
Subject Areas: Topology
1. Introduction
The concept of a C-open set in a topological space was introduced by E. Hatir, T. Noiri and S. Yksel in 1996 [1] . The authors define a set s to be a C-open set if, where u is open and A is semi-preclosed. A set s is a C-closed set if its complement is C-open set or equivalently if
, where u is closed and A is semi-preopen. The authors show that a subset of a topological space is open if and only if it is an α-open set and a C-open set. This enable them to provide the following decomposition of continuity: a function is continuous if and only if it is α-continuous and C-continuous.
Recall that a subset A of a topological space is called α-open if A is the difference of an open and a nowhere dense subset of X. A set A is called α-closed if its complement is α-open or equivalently if A is union of a closed and a nowhere dense set. Sets which are dense in some regular closed subspace are called semi-preopen or β-open. A set is semi-preclosed or β-closed if its complement is semi-preopen or β-open.
The concept of a set A was β-open if and only if was introduced by J. Dontchev in 1998 [2] .
Recall that a real-valued function f defined on a topological space x was called A-continuous if the preimage of every open subset of belongs to A, where A was a collection of subset of x and this the concept was introduced by M. Przemski in 1993 [3] . Most of the definitions of function used throughout this paper are consequences of the definition of A-continuity. However, for unknown concepts, the reader might refer to papers introduced by J. Dontchev in 1995 [4] , M. Ganster and I. Reilly in 1990 [5] .
Hence, a real-valued function f defined on a topological space x is called c-continuous (resp. α-continuous) if the preimage of every open subset of is c-open (resp. α-open) subset of x.
Results of Katĕtov in 1951 [6] and in 1953 [7] concerning binary relations and the concept of an indefinite lower cut set for a real-valued function, which was due to Brooks in 1971 [8] , were used in order to give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong insertion of a continuous function between two comparable real-valued functions.
If g and f are real-valued functions defined on a space X, we write in case
for all x in X.
The following definitions were modifications of conditions considered in paper introduced by E. Lane in 1976 [9] .
A property p defined relative to a real-valued function on a topological space is a c-property provided that any constant function has property p and provided that the sum of a function with property p and any continuous function also has property p. If and
are c-property, the following terminology is used: A space x has the weak c-insertion property for
if and only if for any functions g and f on x such that
has property
and f has property
, then there exists a continuous function h such that
.
In this paper, it is given a sufficient condition for the weak c-insertion property. Also several insertion theorems are obtained as corollaries of this result.
2. The Main Result
Before giving a sufficient condition for insertability of a continuous function, the necessary definitions and terminology are stated.
Let be a topological space, the family of all α-open, α-closed, C-open and C-closed will be denoted by
,
,
and
, respectively.
Definition 2.1. Let a be a subset of a topological space. Respectively, we define the α-closure, α-interior, C-closure and C-interior of a set a, denoted by
and
as follows:
Respectively, we have are α-closed, semi-preclosed and
are α-open, semi-preopen.
The following first two definitions are modifications of conditions considered in [6] [7] .
Definition 2.2. If ρ is a binary relation in a set S then is defined as follows:
if and only if
implies
and
implies
for any u and v in S.
Definition 2.3. A binary relation ρ in the power set of a topological space x is called a strong binary relation in
in case ρ satisfies each of the following conditions:
1) If for any
and for any
, then there exists a set C in
such that
and
for any
and any
.
2) If, then
.
3) If, then
and
.
The concept of a lower indefinite cut set for a real-valued function was defined [8] as follows:
Definition 2.4. If f is a real-valued function defined on a space x and if for a real number
, then
is called a lower indefinite cut set in the domain of f at the level
.
We now give the following main result:
Theorem 2.1. Let g and f be real-valued functions on a topological space x with. If there exists a strong binary relation ρ on the power set of x and if there exist lower indefinite cut sets
and
in the domain of f and g at the level t for each rational number t such that if
then
, then there exists a continuous function h defined on X such that
.
Proof. Let g and f be real-valued functions defined on x such that. By hypothesis there exists a strong binary relation ρ on the power set of x and there exist lower indefinite cut sets
and
in the domain of f and g at the level t for each rational number t such that if
then
.
Define functions F and g mapping the rational numbers into the power set of X by
and
. If
and
are any elements of
with
, then
, and
. By Lemmas 1 and 2 of [7] it follows that there exists a function h mapping
into the power set of X such that if
and
are any rational numbers with
, then
and
.
For any x in x, let.
We first verify that: If x is in
then x is in
for any
; since x is in
implies that
, it follows that
. Hence
. If x is not in
, then x is not in
for any
; since x is not in
implies that
, it follows that
. Hence
.
Also, for any rational numbers and
with
, we have
. Hence
is an open subset of X, i.e., h is a continuous function on x.
The above proof used the technique of proof of Theorem 1 of [6] .
3. Applications
The abbreviations and
are used for α-continuous and c-continuous, respectively.
Corollary 3.1. If for each pair of disjoint α-closed (resp. c-closed) sets of X , there exist open sets
and
of X such that
,
and
then X has the weak c-insertion property for
(resp.
).
Proof. Let g and f be real-valued functions defined on the X, such that f and g are (resp.
), and
. If a binary relation ρ is defined by
in case
(resp.
), then by hypothesis ρ is a strong binary relation in the power set of x. If
and
are any elements of
with
, then
since is an α-closed (resp. c-closed) set and since
is an α-open (resp. c-open) set, it follows that
(resp.
). Hence
implies that
. The proof follows from Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 3.2. If for each pair of disjoint α-closed (resp. c-closed) sets, there exist open sets
and
such that
,
and
then every α-continuous (resp. c-continuous) function is continuous.
Proof. Let f be a real-valued α-continuous (resp. c-continuous) function defined on the X. Set, then by Corollary 3.1, there exists a continuous function h such that
.
Corollary 3.3. If for each pair of disjoint subsets of X , such that
is α-closed and
is C-closed, there exist open subsets
and
of X such that
,
and
then x have the weak c-insertion property for
and
.
Proof. Let g and f be real-valued functions defined on the X, such that g is ac (resp.) and f is
(resp. ac), with
. If a binary relation ρ is defined by
in case
(resp.
), then by hypothesis ρ is a strong binary relation in the power set of X. If
and
are any elements of
with
, then
since is a c-closed (resp. α-closed) set and since
is an α-open (resp. c-open) set, it follows that
(resp.
). Hence
implies that
. The proof follows from Theorem 2.1.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by Centre of Excellence for Mathematics(University of Isfahan).
Cite this paper
Majid Mirmiran, (2016) Weak Insertion of a Continuous Function between Two Comparable α-Continuous (C-Continuous) Functions. Open Access Library Journal,03,1-4. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102453
References
- 1. Hatir, E., Noiri, T. and Yksel, S. (1996) A Decomposition of Continuity. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 70, 145-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00113919 - 2. Dontchev, J. (1998) Between α- and β-Sets. Mathematica Balkanica, 12, 295-302.
- 3. Przemski, M. (1993) A Decomposition of Continuity and α-Continuity. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 61, 93-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01872101 - 4. Dontchev, J. (1995) The Characterization of Some Peculiar Topological Space via α- and β-Sets. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 69, 67-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01874608 - 5. Ganster, M. and Reilly, I. (1990) A Decomposition of Continuity. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 56, 299-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01903846 - 6. Katětov, M. (1951) On Real-Valued Functions in Topological Spaces. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 38, 85-91.
- 7. Katětov, M. (1953) Correction to, “On Real-Valued Functions in Topological Spaces”. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 40, 203-205.
- 8. Brooks, F. (1971) Indefinite Cut Sets for Real Functions. The American Mathematical Monthly, 78, 1007-1010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2317815 - 9. Lane, E. (1976) Insertion of a Continuous Function. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 66, 181-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1976.66.181
NOTES
*This work was supported by University of Isfahan and Centre of Excellence for Mathematics (University of Isfahan).