Advances in Pure Mathematics, 2011, 1, 105-117
doi:10.4236/apm.2011.14023 Published Online July 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/apm)
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
Left Eigenvector of a Stochastic Matrix
S
ylva
i
n
Lavall
e
´
e
Departement de mathematiques, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Montreal, Canada
E-mail:
sylvain.lavallee@uqtr.ca
Received January 7, 2011; revised June 7, 2011; accepted June 15, 2011
Abstract
We determine the left eigenvector of a stochastic matrix associated to the eigenvalue 1 in the commu-
tative and the noncommutative cases. In the commutative case, we see that the eigenvector associated to the
eigenvalue 0 is , where is the
M
1
(,, )
n
NN i
Nith
principal minor of , where is the
identity matrix of dimension . In the noncommutative case, this eigenvector is , where is
the sum in of the corresponding labels of nonempty paths starting from and not passing through
in the complete directed graph associated to .
=n
NMI
1
1
(,P

i
n
I
n1
)
,
n
Pi
P
ij
a
iM
Keywords: Generic Stochastic Noncommutative Matrix, Commutative Matrix, Left Eigenvector Associated
To The Eigenvalue 1, Skew Field, Automata
1. Introduction
It is well known that 1 is one of the eigenvalue of a
stochastic matrix (i.e. the sum of the elements of each
row is equal to 1) and its associated right eigenvector is
the vector . But, what is the left eigenvector
associated to 1?
(1,1, ,1)T

In the commutative case, this eigenvector is the vector
1
(,, )
n
M
M , where i
M
is the i principal minor
of the matrix. This formula is known in probability
theory; it amounts to finding the stationary distribution
of the finite Markov chain whose transition matrix is the
stochastic irreducible matrix.
th
In the noncommutative case, we must involve inverses
of elements of the skew field and as these may be
undefined, we take a generic noncommutative stochastic
matrix: this is the matrix of noncommuting vari-
ables ij subject only to the stochastic identities; i.e. the
sum of each row equals one.
()
ij
a
a
We work in the free field generated by these variables
(in the sense of Paul Cohn), which we call the stochastic
free field. Considering the complete digraph on the set
, let i
{1,,}n
M
be the set of paths from to i. Let
i be the paths starting from and not passing
through again. We identify i with the noncom-
mutative power series which is equal to the sum of all the
words in i and we still denote this series by i. Next
we show that the elements
i
P i
i
P
P
P
1
i
P
can be evaluated in the
stochastic free field and that the vector
is fixed by our matrix; moreover, the sum
of the
1
1
(,,
n
PP


1
i
P
1
)
is equal to 1, hence they form a kind of
noncommutative limiting probability.
These results have been proved in [1] but the proof
proposed in this paper are completely different.
Indeed for the major part the proof in these two
instances, we use elementary operations on the rows and
the columns of the matrix.
2. Commutative Case
The commutative case is well known in probability
theory. Indeed, we calculate the limit probability of a
finite Markov chain by replacing the stochastic matrix
by
M
MI, where is the identity matrix of the
appropriate dimension. For this, we use the Markov
chain tree Theorem, where this calculus is expressed in
terms of spanning trees. The Markov chain tree theorem
gives a formula for the stationary distribution of a finite
Markov chain. Equivalently, this formula gives a row
vector fixed by a matrix fixing . This
theorem is attributed to Kirchoff by Persi Diaconis, who
gives a probabilistic proof of it (see [2] p. 443 and 444).
See also [3,4].
I
(1,1, ,1)T

The proof uses only the definition of the determinant
which involves the principal minors.
Proposition 1 Let be a stochastic matrix and M
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
106
n1,
==()
nijij
b
NMI
n
; i.e. for all , =1,,in
=1 =0
ij
jb
. Then , where is the i
1
(,, )
n
NN i
Nth
principal minor of , is the left eigenvector associated
to the eigenvalue 0.
N
Proof. By definition of , we have
N
det= 0N.
We show that
12
(, ,, )=0
n
NN N
 N
We verify this Equation with the first column of .
N
1111
11121, 1
22 232
21222, 1
32 333
11 1
1,11,21, 1
23
112 1,1
=2
22 232
222 2,1
32 333
=2
11
23
1,
=2
=
=
nn
n
n
n
n
n
nn nn
nn nn
n
jn
j
nn
jn
n
j
nn nnn
nj n
j
NbN b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
b
bb b
bb
 





 
1
1,21, 1
12121, 1
22 232
22222, 1
32 333
11 1
1,21,21, 1
23
=0
1, 1121,1
2, 1222,1
1, 11,21, 1
=0
=
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
nn nn
nn nn
nn
nn
nn nnn
b
b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b

 


 


 



112 1,1
222 2,1
11
1,1,21, 1
112 1,1
22 232
2222,1
32 333
11 1
1,1,21, 1
23
22 232
32 333
11
23
=
=(1
nn
nn
nn
nn nnn
nn
n
nn
n
n
nn nnn
nn nn
n
n
nn nn
bb b
bb b
bb
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
b
bb b
 
 

 
 





12 131
22 232
2
1
1,2 1,31,
12 131
22 232
22 232
32 3331
11 1
1,2 1,31,
23
)
=(1)
=det =0
n
n
n
n
nn nn
n
n
n
nn
n
nn nn
nn nn
bbb
bb b
b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb b
bb
bb b
bb b
 
 
 
N



Remark 2 If is reducible, then this proposition is
asserting that the zero vector ia an eigenvector. If is
irreducible and stochastic, then its adjoint will be of the
form , where is a null vector. Te pro-
M
M(1,,1) T
 uT
u
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
107
position follows from the cofactor formula for the adjoint.
3. Noncommutative Case
In [1], the authors have prove in two manners that are
actually similar, Theorem 9. In the first, results from
variable-length prefix codes are required; and the second
deals with general variable-length codes, not necessarily
prefix. Moreover, in Appendix 2 of [1], we see how the
theory of quasideterminants may be used to obtain these
results on noncommutative matrices.
The major part of the new proof of this Theorem
involves only the elementary operations on the rows and
on the columns of the stochastic matrix. Therefore, we
need the following results.
3.1. Languages and Series
Let
A
be a finite alphabet and *
A
be the free monoid
generated by
A
. A language is a subset of a free
monoid *
A
. A language is rational if it is obtained from
finite languages by the operations (called rational) union,
product (concatenation) and star. The product of two
languages is
12
LL

12 1122
,wwwLwL, and the star
of is
L

*
10
=,0=
n
ni n
LwwwLn L
 . Ra-
tional languages may be obtained by using only unam-
biguous rational operations; these are: disjoint union,
unambiguous product (meaning that if , then
has a unique factorization 12
, ii
12
wLL
www=wwL
) and
the star restricted to languages which are free
submonoids of
*
L
*
A
.
A formal series is an element of the -algebra of
noncommutative series
A
 , where
A
is a set of
noncommuting variables. A rational series is an element
of the smallest subalgebra of
A
 , which contains
the -algebra of noncommutative polynomials
A
,
and which is closed under the operation

1
*
=0
==1
n
n
SS SS
which is defined if has zero constant term. We
denote by the -algebra of rational series.
S
rat
A 
Let be a rational language. Since may be
obtained by unambiguous rational expressions, it follows
L L
that its characteristic series wL is ratio-
nal. We shall identify a language and its characteristic
series. This is exposed in [5] or [6].
wA

3.2. Free Field
Let be a field. If the multiplicative group of is
commutative, then is a commutative field. Else,
is called skew field. The ring of rational formal series in
noncommutative variables
 
 
rat
A
  is not a skew
field. However, skew fields containing
A
 do exist.
One of them is the free field (in the sense of Cohn),
denoted . The free field is the noncommutative
analogue of the field of fractions of the ring of commu-
tative polynomials. There are several constructions of the
free field: Amitsur [7], Bergman [8], Malcolmson [9],
Cohn [10] and [11].
A square matrix of order n is full if it can’t expressed
as a product of matrices 1nn
by . 1nn
Theorem 3 ([11], Thm 4.5.8 .) Each full matrix
with coefficients in
M
X
is invertible in the free field.
A square matrix of order is called ho llow if it
contains a
n
pq
block of zeros such that 1pqn
.
Example 4 The matrix
001
001
111
is hollow since
there is a 22
block of 0 and . 4>3
Proposition 5 ([11], Prop. 4.5.4) A hollow matrix is
not full.
Proposition 6 Take , and
1n
nn
M
1n
, where is a skew field. We suppose that
M is invertible. Then 0
M
is invertible if and
only if 10
M

.
Proof.
()
Suppose that , then the inverse
1
=
cM

0
of 0
M
is
11111
11 1

 
1
MMcMMc
cM c

Indeed, this matrix is the right inverse of since
M
111111
11 1
1111 1111
1111 11
11 111 1
1111 11
==
0
()(
=()
1
=
cc
c
M
 
 
 
 
  
 






1
)
 

 

MMM MMc
cM c
MMMcMcMM cc
MMcM Mc
cMcMc c
MMcM Mc
  


 
 
 
10
=01



S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
108
This matrix is also the left inverse of since
M
111111
11 1
1 111111 111
11 111
1111111 1
=
11
=
0
()()
=() ()
1
c
c

 
  
 
 











 
M
MMcMMc
cM c
MMcMMMc MMcM
cMMc cM
McMcMMc M
cM
 
 

11
=
cc

 
 
 
10
=01



Suppose that
()0



M
is invertible. Let




M
be its inwe have
Hence 1
verse. Then
0
=
00








M


1

==
0


M

and =
0
0



. It follows
that
1
=
M

1
==
M
 
1
is proposition, we de follo
ry 7 Let
10
M

From theduce thwing result.
Corolla ,
M and
be with
coeffic
matrices
ients in
A
 where M is full. If 0



M
is
not full (in paar, if rticul 0



M
is by
elementary operations on the lines and on the columns to
a hollow
3.
Let be a generic noncommutative matrix;
tive var
ld. We
equivalent
matrix) then in the free field.
1=0
M

3. Generic Stochastic Matrices

i.e. the ij
a are noncommutaiables. We denote
the corresponding free fie associate to M
1,
=ij ijn
a
M
the matrix
S
: it’s exactly the same matrix of which the
coefficients satisfy the dentities stochastic i
(1)
In other words, the sum of each line of
=1j
=1,, ,=1
n
ij
ina
S
is equal to
1; hence
S
is a stochastic matrix. We call
S
a gene-
ric noncommutative stochastic matrix. The algebra over
generated by its coefficients is associative
ra, it is isomorph to the algebr
algeb
free a
a since,ai j
ij

.
e stochastic
/(
1)
ij
h
by
Indeedn eliminate the with t
relations We denote thbra
, we ca
(1).
ii
a
is algea
.
field called
Hence,e is a corresponding free
stochastic free field denoted
ther
S
.
3.4. Paths
Consider the set of nonempty paths in the complete
directed graph with a set of vertices

1,, n starting
from i and not passing through i; we denote by i
P
the sum in ij
a
 of all the corresp
tional series, and t
of the
le
onding words. It is
defines an element classically a rahus
free field .
Examp 8 =ab
cd
M. The graph is
then
**
12
=1 ,=1PbdPc a
We shall also consider rational expressions over any
Ia a
ctua
nocal embedding of into
seen as follows: let tional
ace in it the
skew field D, and say that such an expression is
evaluable in D if it can be evaluated without inversion
of 0. f the elements of D appering in the rationl
expression lly in a subring R of D, we say
that the expression is over R.
There is a cani
are a
rat
A 
ny ra
y 1T
ser
, which can be S be a
ies, we reploperation *
T b

1
, which is
age of
;
then
evalua
one obtains a rational expressi
ble in and represents the im
on in
S
under
the embedding . Thus,
rat
A  each rational
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
109
language and each rational series is naturally an element
of the free field. See [12].
By Theorem 1 of [1], the can be evaluated in the
stochastic free field.
n now state the main result of this paper.
rem 9 Let
i
P
We ca
Theo

1,
=ij ij n
a
M be a generic
stochastic noncommutative matrix. Let defined as
ab
i
ove. Then

11 11
11
,,= ,,
nn
P be
P
PPP
 
 M (2)
In other words,

11
1,,
n
PP

 is the left eenvector
associated to the eigenvalueo
ig
be the m
1 f M.
Example 10 (Continued.) Let be S atrix
with =1ab and =1cd. We show that

11 11
12 12
,=,
M
P
PPP
 
M
From this systehe two following equa- m, we deduce t
tions:
1
1=
1
Pa P
1
1
(4)
n (3), we have
(5)
*
1
2
=
d
Since we again obtain Equation (5), it follows that
Equation (4) is also satisfied.
Proof of Theorem 9.
Let be the matrix of the automaton
and be the langua
starting fr and not passing through . We have
,n
where
Let
12 1
dP (3)
P

12
2
1=aPdP
11

From the Equatio

11 1
12 1
1=Pa PdP
 

 
11
21
1=1PdPa

 
**
21
=dP aP

* *
1=1dcaabd
**
 
** *** *
1= 1daa ad 
d da
***
=daad
Hence, Equation (3) is satisfied. From the Equation (4),
we have

11
12
1PaPdP


 
11
12
1=1Pa

 
**
12
=aP dP

1,
=ij ij n
a
M
i
P
om
ge of the labels of the paths
i i
=1
=,=1,,
n
iij
j
PLi
=1 =1,
1, =
kk
kj
if ij
==,
nn
ij
ik kjijikkj
LLaaLaifi j


i
S be the system composed of the Equa-
tions , in
n
i
P1,1,1
,, , ,,
iiiii
LLL L

 .
1
Multlying to the
left by
ip
i
P
each equation ofwe obtain the system
n
i
S,

1,
1
:
ii
ij
jji
i
T
Pa

11
1
1,
1=,=1,,
n
n
iij iikkj
kki
PPLi
PLa


1
=
ii
j
PL

Let i ij
QPL, then we have
n
1
=
ij

1
1,
1
1,
1=,=1,,
:
=
ii
j
jji
in
ijiijik kj
kki
PQi
T
QPa Qa


n

This system transforms into the following system
We show that
1
1,
1=,=1,,
n
iij
jji
i
iijij jj
PQin
U
PaQ aQa

 

1
:
0=
n

1, ,
1ikkj
kki
kj
11
11
=1
n
kk
k
Pa P
Define
1
(6)
We show that . So Equation (6) is converted
into the following Equation
0 (7)
ua-
tion (7) and the systems . We have the
matrical representation
1
1
=kk
k
RPa
1
=1
n
P
=0R

11
1111
=2
1=
n
kk
k
RP aPa


Consider the system of the 21n Equations: Eq
n

1,,UU

n
11
11213 1221232
1
1,1
,,,,,,,,,,
,,, =
nn
nn nn
RP QQQP QQQ
PQ Q

 
 Eλ
,
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
110
12
aa
,1 ,1
11121, 11, 11
21222, 12, 12
1,11,21, 11, 11,
1,11,21, 11,11,
,1,2, 1, 1
1
1
=1
1
1
mmmm mmmn
mm
mm
m
m mmmmmmn
mmmmmmmn
nnnm nmnn
a aa
aaa aa
aaa aa
aa aaa
aaa aa
aaa aa



 






n
n

A 
 
E
where =1, ,mn and =(0, ,0,1, ,1)
ntimes
 

 . is a
square mder atrix of or21n. We have 1
=,
RE
2
0,,0)
T
n times

 and =(1,
=0



E
F
. The orde this r of
matrix is . Moreover, with the stochastic identities,
we have
22n
i
B
where the are defined by
n
n
n
a
12,1 ,1
1121,11,11
=1,1
2122, 12,12
=1, 2
1,11,1,11,
=1,2,
1
1,11,21, 11,1,
=1, 1
,1 ,2
mmmm mmmn
n
kmm
kk
n
km m
kk
n
mmkmm m
kk
km
n
mmmmmk mn
kkm
nn
aaa aa
aaa aa
aaa a
aaa a
a a
aa



 

 



 
,1 ,1
=1,
n
nm nmnk
kkn
aa















1, 2
=
mm
a
a
B
aa a
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
111
To show that , we show that the matrix
=0R
F
is
hollow. For this, we apply elementary operations on the
rows and on thns ofe colum
F
Step 2. We want a
until
F
coa ntains
s
t block of 0 s uch that2
n3st .
Step 1. We eliminate the first rowe and the last
column of
F
. We obtain the square matrix 1
F
of order
).
21n (22nst
nn
block of 0 in the right upper
corner of 1
F
. For this, we consider the row of
j-th
1
F
(corresnding t- row ). By
structio , the first index of the elements of the
ro t weer the
first
c. oeth the
ve blocks
po
n of
w of
its ele
tion of
h ha
o the
block is
ents is
We repeat
rst index e
j
j
block
j
th
. Now,
2
B
. Such a
this
quals to
of
c
such that this
ratio
j in
B
onsi
row exists by
n w
the
1
d
i
con
j-
row
co
3
1
B
his
which passes in the
m
2
B
the fi
th
index of
nstru
row whic
,,
p
n
BB

w of
. We add each one of these rows to the j-th
ro 1
F
. It follows that the
atrix
n
ar
last ele
e all equal to
we subtract the last row
ments of the
1. From
j
each
1
first rows of this new m
j
row of the first rows, of
F
.
We obtain the following matrix
where
1,11 1
2, 12, 12
m
mn
m n
a a
aaa


112 1,
=1,1
21 2
=1, 2
,1,2,, 1,1
=1,
=
n
k
kk
n
km
kk
m
n
nn nmnm
kkn
aa a
aa
aa aa









C

nk
a
. We reduce


=2,,
mn 2
F
3
in removing the last line
column if we start from the end. We
atrix
and the
have the
nth
following m
F
of order 2
n,
(1
s
tn ).
Step 3. Consider the rows of
i
L3
F
, where
and . We want thathe last
mews to be e to
>in
ele-
nm
0modin
nts of these ro
t
quals
(1)
t
n
0. Le=ik
,
ation wher , then
n
e mn01we apply the transform
(1) (1)
=
iknknmk
LLL L

, to obtain the matrix
=2,,mn
where, for all ,

1,
=,=,=
mm
mijmijij ijnj
ijn
dbd

mm
bb
DB
(1)n
We remove the rows where and
i
L>in
ni and the (1n)
last columns of 4
F
to obtain the
matrix 5
F
of order (st 2
n2n
).
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
112
where m
D
is the matrix obtained from m
D
in remo-
Step 4. Denote by the first column of the matrix
and byn of
ving the last row.
1
m
C
the colum
m
C m
d 5
F
, which is the ex-
tension of . We to be transformed into a
of. For this, we apply the
1
m
,
C
0
want
, ,mn
1
m
C
vector
op
=2
eration 23
j
n
dcc c, where is the it
i
ch
colum 3
n of
F
.
Finally we want that the first n elements t
column
of th
of
e firs
5
F
to
transformati
be all 0; for this, we apply the
on 12
cc c
n. We obtain the matrix 6
F
of order )
21 (stnn22nn
where m
C is the mtrix obtaained from by
remfirst column.
Step 5. We want each will be transformed into a
m colum
m
C
oving the
m
C
atrix of 0. To each n q of m
, denoted m
C

q
C
correspo ding to the


,*,,*
T
q
n column =
qm
d
C of
6
F
. By construction of (hence of ), there exists
a column of
m
Cm
C
q
b6
F
such that
*

=,*,,
T
q
qm
b
C.
Hence, for all, we calculate . We obtain the
matrix
qqq
db
7
F
of). order 21nn (22nnst
Step 6. Permuting tst and the nth column of
7
he fir
F
, we x 8
obtain the matri
F
of der 2
nor 1n
(22stnn
).
where 1
B
is the 1
B
block obtained from by removing
. We find a 1block of 0
upper corn
the first column
located in the right

2
11nn
2
)(1nn 
er and

22
8
= 21=dimnn nn
F
It follows that
F
is a hollow. From Corollary 7,
Let
1
is
Example 11.
11
1
=1
== =0
n
kk
kPa P

RE

. Hence

11
,,P


11n
P
the left eigenvector associated to 1.
11 1213
aa
21
a
22 23
31 3233
=
a
aa a
aa
M be a generic
in w
s
non
de
commutative matrix hich the variables satisfy the
stochastic intitie123ii i
aa a=1
e
associate theutomn
, =1,2,3i. W
at ao
Let 1
P be the language recognized by automaton the
Let ij
L be the language of start from i
to j. We have 1111213
=,PL LL
words which
where
11 =1L
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
113
stem
each equation of
1212 1222 1332
=LaLaLa
1313 12231333
=LaLaLa
We have the sy

12 13
:=
SL
aLaL

112 1212221332
1313 1223 13
1
=
PLL
a
LaLaLa
 

33
Multiplying to left by 1
P
1
S1
, we
obtain the system
Define , then
We obtain
a
Permuting the index of the equations of , we obtain
the two following systems
a
a
To show that
1
U
 

1
22123
1
2121123 31
22321132333
1=
:0= 1
0= 1
PQQ
UPaQaQ
PaQaQ a



2 21
1



1
33132
1
3331311132 21
1
33231123222
1=
:0= 1
0= 1
PQQ
UPaQaQ
PaQaQ a




11 1
1
11
11 121
1=
:=
PPLPL
TPLP
 


1
12113
1 1
121122211332
111 1
1 13113112231 1333
=
aPLaPLa
PLPa PLaPLa
 
 



111111
123 123
,,= ,,PPP PPP

M
111
, it
suffices to prove that 1
111221 3311
=Pa Pa PaP

 .
Define
1
1
1
=
ij ij
QPL
111
111221331 1
=RPa PaPa P


then
1
11213
1
112 112 1222 1332
1
1311312231333
1=
:=
=
PQQ
TQPa QaQa
QPaQaQa



111
111221331
1=RPaPa Pa

  0
Under the matrical system, we have
11
112 13221 23331 32
,1,,,,,,,, =RPQQP QQP QQ

Eλ
 
1
11213
1
1112122213 32
1=
:0= 1
PQQ
UPaQa


where
Q
= 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1λ

1
1
1312231333
0= 1PaQaQ a

and
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
a
We have
11 1213
22 23
32 33
2121 23
11 13
31 33
3131 32
11 12
21 22
100000000
1 000010
0 1000010
0 1000010
00 0001
=000 10001
000 10001
0000 00
00000 100
00 100
aa a
aa
aa
aaa
aa
aa
aa
aa
aa














E
000
1
=
RE
,
,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
where
and E with stochastic iden- tities equal to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
a

= 1,0,0T
1
12 13
12 13
21 2323
3231 32
2121 23
13
3131 32
3131 32
12 1312
2121 23
00000000
000010
0 000010
0 000010
00 0001
0 001
0000 001
0000 00
00000 00
00000 00
aa aa
aa a
aaa
aaa
aa a
aaa
aa
aa a
aaa
 

 





 
12 13
00 0
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
114
Let =0



E
F
, we show that
F
is hollow.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
a
,
000
0
0
0
1
aa aaaa aaa a
a

1
1
 
12 131213
21 2323
323132
2121 23
13
3131 32
3131 32
12 1312
2121 23
1000000000
0 0
0 0000100
0 0000100
00 00010
00 00 0010
0 00 0010
0000 001
00000001
00000001
0000000111
aa aa
aa a
aaa
aaa
aa
aaa
aa
aaa
aaa






F
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
00010
a
12 13
=
0
12 131213
21 2323
323132
2121 23
12 13
1
3131 32
3131 32
12 1312
2121 23
000010
0 000010
0 000010
00 0001
00 00 001
=00 001
0000001
000 0 000
000 0 000
000000011
aa aa
aa a
aaa
aaa
aa a
aa
aa
aa a
aaa
 






F
13
00a
15810 2491036710
,,LLLL LLLL LLLL
12 13121312 131312 1312
2121 232321232121 23
313231 323131 323132
21 23
12 1313
2
3131 32
3131 32
12 1312
000
000
0001
00 00 001
=00 00 001
0000 00
000000
aaaa aaaaa
aaaaaaaa a
aa
aaa
aaa
aa
aaa
 




F
2121 23
01
0000000
000000011
aaa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
21 00a
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
115
0
0
1
1
a
,
a
aaa
,
aaa
1213 12131213131213 12
2121232321232121 23
313231 323131323132
2121 23
3121313
3131 32
3131 32
12 1312
00
00
00
00 001
=00000 10
00 00 01
0000 0
00 0 0 00
00 0 0 0
aa aaaaaaa a
aaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaa a
aaa
aaa
aaa
aa
aaa
a

 




F
212123 01aa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
46 56 79 89
,,,LLLL LLLL
12 13121312 131312 1312
2121 232321232121 23
313231 323131 323132
2121 31233132
4 121331133132
3131 32
3131 21
00
00
00
000 000
=00000 00
00 00010
00 00
aa aaaaaaaa
aaaa aaa aa
aaaa aaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaa
aaa

 
 

 


F
3221 23
12 1321122123
2121 23
00
00 00000
00 00001
aa
aaaaaa
aaa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
12 13121312 131312 1312
2121232321232121 23
313231 323131 323132
521 2131233132
12 13 3113 3132
3131 213221 23
12 1321
=0000
00 000
00 00
00 000
aa aaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaa
aaaa aaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaa
aaaa

 
 

 


F
1221 23
aa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
123 423 623
,,CCCCCCCCC
12 131312
21 23232321 23
32313231 3232
6212131233132
12 13 31133132
3131 213221 23
12 1321122123
000
000
000
=000 0
00 000
00 00
00 000
aa aa
aa aaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaa
aaaaaa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
F
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
116
aaa
a
We have a block of zero with . It follows
that
53 72
,,CC CC
12 13
21 2323
323132
7212131 233132
1213 31 13 31 32
3131 213221 23
12 1321122123
00000
00000
00000
=000 0
00 000
00 00
00 000
aa
aa a
aaa
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaa
aaaaaa
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
F
13
CC
13 12
2321 23
31 3232
8 212131233132
12 13 31133132
3131 213221 23
12 1321122123
00000
00000
00000
=0 000
0000 0
0000
0000 0
aa
aaa
aa a
aaaaaa
aaaaaa
aaaaa
aaaaaa
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
F
35 8>7
F
Pa
This pr
is hollow. By C
11
221
Pa


allo
orollary 7,
0
.
Theorem 12. Let be defined as above, then in
we have
(8)
Proof. Define
1 1
1113311
==PaP

R
oof ws us to prove the next result.
i
P
1
=1
=1
n
i
i
P
1
=1
=1
n
i
i
P
R
we will show that
We replace the first column of the matrix
1
=1
=1
n
i
i
P
R
E
by the
vector
and the first element of by 1. Denoted

1,1,0, ,0,1,0, ,0, ,1,0, ,0T
 
λ
E
and
λ
these two matrices. Consider the matrix =0
E
F
.
We repeat each step of the proof of Theorem 9, except
for the last operation of step 4, which concerns the first
column. Again, we show that
F
=0.
is hollow, and hence,
by Corollary 7, we have This proves Equation
(8).
Example 13. (Continued.)
R

11 11*
1211
11* 1*1
11 111
=1byEquation(5)
==1=
PP PPad
PPbdPbd PP
 
 


=1
4. Conclusions
One of the contribution of this article is the using of
elementary operations on the lines and the columns. This
method provides a new way to obtain some results in
skew field theory with a minimum of knowledge of this
theory. Moreover, Theorems 9 and 12 are proved exactly
the same way.
5. Acknowledgements
I am obliged to thank to Christophe Reutenauer for his
comments, corrections and suggestions.
6. References
[1] S. Lavall´ee, D. Perrin, C. Reutenauer and V. Retakh,
“Codes and Noncommutative Stochastic Matrices,” To
S.
LAVALL
E
´
E
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. APM
117
appear, 2008.
[2] A. Broder, “Generating Random Spanning Trees. Proc
30th IEEE Symp,” Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Sympo-
sium on Foundation of Computer Science, Boston, 1989,
pp. 442-447.
[3] V. Anantharam and P. Tsoucas, “A Proof of the Markov
Chain Tree Theorem,” Statistic and Probability Letters,
Vol. 8, No. 2, 1989, pp. 189-192.
[4] D.-J. Aldous, “The Randow Walk Construction of Uni-
form Spanning Trees and Uniform Labelled Trees,”
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 4,
1990, pp. 450-465.
[5] J. Berstel and C. Reutenauer, “Les S´eries Rationnelles et
Leurs Langages,” Masson, Paris, 1984.
[6] J. Bersl and C. Reutenauer, “Rational Series and Their
Languages,” 2008.
http://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~berstel/LivreSeries/LivreSe
ries08janvier2008.pdf.
[7] A. Amitsur, “Rational Identities and Applications to Al-
gebra and Geometry,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 1966,
pp. 304-359.
[8] G. M. Bergman, “Skew Field of Noncommutative Ra-
tional Functions, after Amitsur,” S´eminaire Schu¨tzen-
berger-Lentin-Nivat, Vol. 16, 1970.
[9] P. Malcolmson, “A Prime Matrix Ideal Yields a Skew
Field,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, l.
18, 1978, pp. 221-233.
[10] P. M. Cohn, “Free Rings and Their Relations,” Academic
Press, Salt Lake City, 1971.
[11] P. M. Cohn, “Skew Fields: Theory of General Division
Rings,” Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applica-
tions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
[12] M. Fliess, “Sur le Plongement de l’alg`ebre des S´eries
Rationelles non Commutatives dans un Corps Gauche,”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Paris,
1970.
te
Vo