Open Jour nal of Geol o gy, 2011, 1, 17-36
doi:10.4236/ojg.2011.12003 Published Online July 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojg)
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
Regolith Geochemistry and Mineralogy of the Mbalam
Itabirite-Hosted Iron Ore District, South Eastern
Cameroon
Melvin Tamnta Nforba1,2*, Veronique Kamgang Kabeyene3, Cheo Emmanuel Suh4
1Department of Eart h Sc iences, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2Cameroon Iron Or e Company, Yaoundé, Cameroon
3Higher Teacher’s Training College (ENS), University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé Came roon
4Economi c Ge ology Unit, Department of Geol ogy and Environment al Scienc e, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
E-mail: nforbamel@gmail.com
Received May 3, 2011; revised June 5, 2011; accepted July 7, 2011
Abstract
Mbalam is a major emerging iron ore district in Cameroon. The regolith over the Mbalam itabirite, consists
of relict, erosion and depositional units. Itabirite rock fabric is preserved in the relict regolith, the erosion
unit is marked by erosion of the carapace cap regolith, with the depositional unit dominated by canga (loose
fragments of h ematite and/or itabirite cemen ted by goethite) or loo se scree. Fe concentration i ncreases from
average of 46.18 wt% in the depositional soil material to as much as 79.08 wt% in the relict regolith regime
with variation due to supergene weathering. Fe is the least mobile of the major elements, and the Fe oxides
become significant phases and control the distributions of many elements. Absorption of P by iron oxides or
oxyhydroxides appears to be the major mechanism of P retention in the different regolith environment. Au
dispersion in the weathering profile occurs by two possible mechanisms (mechanical and hydromorphic) and
it distribution is sporadic. Zr maintains a positive correlation with Al and Ti indicating extensive chemical
weathering in the source area and resulting in a relative concentration of those residual elements. The wea-
thered material show relatively high ΣREE; this is due to upward remobilisation from the lower pri mary itabi-
rite, and the downward l eaching of the uppe r m ineral isa ti on hori z ons by the des cending epi ge netic s ol uti ons.
Keywords: Regolith, Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Itabirite, Mbalam, Cameroon
1. Introduction
As the search for ore deposits continues worldwide, the
use of regolith geochemistry will play an increasingly
important role in mineral explor ation [1 ]. Regolith or soil
geochemistry also finds global significance in geochem-
ical ma pping, development of geochemical databases and
in the determination of the background composition of
the soils in a region before mining activity starts. Such
baseline data on regolith composition although applica-
ble to exploration, are vital to monitoring pollution when
the ore extraction process starts. It is against this dual
background that the present study was conducted.
The Mbalam iron ore district in a region of deep wea-
thering is host to over 220 Mt of iron ore and is cur-
rently being investigated by Sundance Resources Li-
mited (www.sundanceresources.com.au). The main ore is
hematite derived from itabirite (metamorphosed banded
iron formation).
Many studies on regolith geochemistry have been
done in Australia mostly related to the older Precambrian
and Archaean geological domains of the Yilgran and
Gawler cratons [2-4]. In the Central African sub region
and Cameroon in particular only limited studies have been
done on the regolith as a tool in exploration and baseline
studies. This study investigates the regolith geochemistry
over weathered itabirite and hematite ore at Mbalam area,
South-eastern Cameroon. The implications of the results
presented to exploration and baseline studies are dis-
cussed. It is envisaged that these findings may be extra-
polated to a regional scale, thus providing a regional
analogue for investigations of the iron deposits within
the Congo Craton and elsewhere in the sub-region.
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
18
2. Geographical and Geological Context of
the Mbalam Iron ore District
The Mbalam Iron ore deposit is located in the Central
African Region in south eastern Cameroon at the north-
ern edge of the Congo craton (Figure 1) near the frontier
with the Republic of Congo. The area lies between lati-
tude (UTM easting) 24500 and 24900 and longitude
(UTM northing) 38200 and 38600.
The Mbalam region like other areas in south eastern
Cameroon is situated in the equatorial forest belt and is
characterised by a humid equatorial climate but lacks
traditional wet and dry seasons. There is a long dry sea-
son from December to May, a light wet season from May
to June, a short dry season from July to October and a
heavy wet season from October to November. Annual
rainfall in the region ranges from between 150 and 220
cm per year [5,6]. It experiences high temperature with
mean daily temperatures averaging nearly 28˚C (82˚F)
year-round while precipitation averages about 150-200
cm (80 inches) year-round. Drainage is well developed
within the highly undulating topography of the region.
Creeks carry torrential flows during the wet season, but
are reduced to a few water holes during the dry season.
Geologically, iron deposits in the Mbalam region are
hosted in Archaean banded iron formations which are
typical supergene hematite enrichments which have re-
crystallized to ferruginous quartzite [7]. The itabirite
hosted massive hematite deposits of the Mbalam region
form part of the Mbalam Series, an Archean greenstone
belt composed of chlorite sericite or amphibolite schists,
pyroxene-bearing amphibolites and serpentinites which
have been dated at 2850 Ma [8]. Similar greenstone ter-
rains with BIF within the Congo Craton are also known
from the High Iv indo in G abon and Nabeba in the Congo
[9]. The metamorphic grade is ambiguous but probably
was amphibolite facies which was subsequently over-
printed by a lower grade sericiteand chloritebearing
green schist event.
The Precambrian crust in Cameroon (Figure 1) has
generally been divided into an Archean cratonic base-
ment underlying the southern part of the country and a
Neoproterozoic mobile belt underlying the central and
northern parts [10,11]. The mobile belt is dominated by
Neoproterozoic (Pan-African) orthogneiss that is well
documented in northern and eastern Cameroon, where
deposition of volcano-sedimentary rocks occurred be-
tween 830 and 700 Ma and was followed by deformation,
metamorphism, and intensive plutonism between 630
and 580 Ma [9-11,15 ].
The Pan-African belt in central Africa north of the
Congo Craton (CC) is the southernmost branch of the
Pan-Africano-Braziliano belt [9-12]. One of the main
characteristics of this regional scale structure is the
presence of Pan-African granulitic rocks in Cameroon
and in Central African Republic (CAR). It includes re-
mobilised and re-worked pre-Pan African basement
(gneiss and migmatite) as well as late Proterozoic meta-
sedimentary rocks that range from low metamorphic
grade up to granulite facies, and Pan African granitoids.
The main geological features of the southern part of the
Central African fold belt (CAFB) is the presence of D2
flat-lying foliations (as well as the granulite facies meta-
morphism) that results from the late Neoproterozoic
stacking of the south-verging thrust unit [12,13] and
reflect a regional E-W nappe. In Cameroon, the nappes
(Fig.1) include the Neoproterozoic Yaoundé group
thrust onto both the Congo Craton and Nyong group,
and the assumed Paleoproterozoic Bafia group thrust
onto the Yaoundé group to the north [12,14]. Metaplu-
tonic rocks include mafic to intermediate rocks and ser-
pentinized chromatic and nickeliferous ultramafic rocks
associated with gabbros, diorites and mafic dykes. Late-
ritic Cu-Ni mineralisation is developed on the serpenti-
nised peridotites located abou t 1000 km due north of the
stud y ar e a.
3. Sampling and Analytical Methods
At each soil sampling location at Mbalam, details of the
landscape position were recorded including aspect, slope,
relief and nature of regolith material. The basic rego-
lith-landform regimes used for the geochemical sampling
were interpretatively mapped as relict, erosional and de-
positional after [16-18]. In the relict and erosional re-
gimes, soil samples were collected between 0.2 to 0.4 m
depth after discarding the humus-rich topsoil. Similar
depths were used in the depositional regime. Every effort
was made to minimize the potential of cross-con ta mi-
nation of samples and introduction of external contami-
nants during sample transportation and preparation.
Drying of samples was conducted at a temperature of
120˚C overnight in a positive pressure fume cupboard in
large calico bags. Splitting was conducted at a local
crushing laboratory, with a dust extraction unit in opera-
tion to remove fine airborne particles derived from sam-
ple preparation and dust in general. All the samples re-
quired pulverizing to obtain homogeneous samples for
chemical analysis. Thus, samples were split in a stainless
steel riffle splitter following pulverization to obtain de-
sired sample for chemical analyses. All soil samples
were milled in an ESSA® mill and fine pulp of 106 µm
mesh size were obtained. After crushing and milling,
samples were split and 50 - 60 g of samples was obtained
for the various analyses.
Chemical and mineralogical analysis was done using
M. T. NFORBA ET AL. 19
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
Figure 1. Map of the Study area. Insert top left shows the road map of Cameroon with an insert of the map of Africa and
the geology map of South east Cameroon (top right).
the pulp at ACME laboratories, Vancouver, Canada.
Major elements (Si, Mg, Fe, Ca, Al, K, P, Ti, Cr) were
analysed by Inductively Couple Plasma—Electro Spec-
troscopy (ICP-ES) following lithium metaborate and/or
tetraborate fusion and dilute nitric acid digestion on a 0.2
g of sample pulp (www.acmelab.com). Rare earth ele-
ments and trace elements were analysed by Inductively
Couple Plasma—Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) follow-
ing an identical sample digestion procedure to ICP-ES on
a 0.1 g sample pulp. The remaining trace elements were
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
20
analysed by ICP-MS after 0.5 g split of sample pulp is
digested in aqua regia. Loss on ignition (LOI) was de-
termined by weight difference after ignition at 1000˚C;
total sulphur (TOT/S) and total carbon (TOT/C) were
determined by combustion analyses. Semi-qualitative
mineral identification was done by X-ray powder dif-
fraction analyses using a Bruckner D4endeavor X-ray
generator at 40 kV and 25mA running conditions. Powd-
er XRD scans were performed with the fine powder
samples and run from 2 to 80˚ 2θ at a step scan of 0.020˚
2θ and 1.00 s counting time per second. Samples for
XRD analysis were taken from each of the regolith soil
material to get an understanding of the element-mineral
association within the regolith material prior to com-
mencement of mining.
4. Results
4.1. Nature of Parent Material and the Different
Weathered Regolith Regimes
The itabirite shows great variation in the thickness of
alternating quartz-rich and Fe-rich layering, and in over-
all Fe content (Figure 2). The layering varies from sub-
mm fine laminations to cm scale. In some very lean (low
Fe portions), layering is more massive, with some thick
beds of pale quartzite (m scale) forming large boulders.
Where the layering is very fine scale it shows great stru c-
tural complex ity, and it owes i ts character to strong shea r-
ing and transposition. It is possible however that some of
the Fe-rich itabirite was generated in fold limbs (or shear
zones) by pressure solution of quartz. Hard mas- sive he-
matite at Mbalam is a late epigenetic type of mineralisa-
tion which forms flat-lying to gently north dipping veins
up to 10 m thick or more that follow low angle brittle
south-verging thrust faults. The hematite is composed of
fine-grained vuggy hematite with late coarse grained
sheaves of specularite inter-grown in places with quartz.
The veins have selvages of early fine grained silica with
pyrite cube s over grown by se condary pyrite.
The relict regolith regime shows typical characteristics
of development on saprolite with a cemented carapace
over the relic material displaying primary structure and
textures and ranging in thickness from 0.5 to 3 m. Imme-
diately beneath the carapace capped relict zone, the BIF
is typically strongly leached and hydrated with abundant
goethite and the destruction of primary textures, but pre-
servation of primary textures, hematite and quartz in-
creases with depth. Minor weathering has occurred
mainly on joints, fault zones, and some bedding planes to
the full depth of most exposed relict material from the
surface, providing good examples of the early stages of
the weathering process for comparison with the fresh
unweathered BIF. High grade enriched soft laminated
(biscuity) ore is limited to relict an d erosional portion s of
Mbarga. It is only expos ed in a few areas (due to intens e
weathering and tree cover) where it is blue-black in co-
lour with powdery hematite interlayered with hard hema-
tite laminations on a millimeter scale. The soft ores on
Mbarga are related to a very well defined plateau with
deep soil and areas of laterite developed over the soft
laminated ore. The laterite shows well preserved relic
laminations.
Locally, erosional regimes are marked by the erosion
of the carapace capped relict which has exposed the un-
derlying goethite zone, which typically shows a vermi-
cular to massive and/or friable biscuit-like textures. This
material consists of nodular to concretionary secondary
goethite with minor pisoliths and botryoidal cavity lin-
ings and numerous small spheroidal (vesicular) to elon-
gated subcylindrical (vermicular) voids and was proba-
bly formed by prolonged weathering of the exposed
goethite zone. Numerous caves found within some ero-
sional iron formations are mainly due to the elutriation of
the fine particles by tunnel erosion along joints and bed-
ding plane s, with enlargem e nt by r o of collaps e .
Most of the depositional lower slopes of Mbarga Hill
(Figure 3) are covered by canga (cemented hematite
scree) or loose scree overlying saprolite. Patches of sil-
crete consisting of bleached chert (quartzitic) fragments
cemented by amorphous silica occur locally. Cavities
ranging in size from a few centimeters to several meters
in length are common within the weathered zone. The
large cavities form partly by solution and dispersion of
colloidal particles, but mainly by elutriation of friable
material along joints and bedding planes, followed by
collapse of the undermined regolith. They are commonly
filled with a heterogeneous assortment of sand-size fria-
ble quartz, silty clay, ferruginous debris, and pisoliths.
4.2 Geochemical Dispersion in the Regolith
Averages for the major, trace and rare earth elements for
the various regolith units are listed in Table 1. The full
data set for analysed samples are presented in Appendix
I.
4.3. Major And Minor Elements
Oxides of three elements, Si, Fe, and Al account for the
bulk of the total rock mass in the form of hematite,
quartz, goethite, kaolinite and gibbsite. These elements
are commonly the residual products of deep chemical
weathering. Concentration of these elements varies sub-
stantially in response to progressive weathering, leaching
and precipitation of the secondary phases within various
regolith regimes. The fresh itabirite fro m Mbalam shows
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
Figure 2. Itabirite outcrop at Mbalam showing alternating of quartz-rich and Fe-rich layering.
Figure 3. Mbalam hills with tropical vegetation cover. Cemented or loose hematite scree on the depositional slopes of the
Mbarga hill (right).
mean silica concentration of 37.40 wt%. Silica concen-
tration within the different weathering regimes ranges
from means of 36.79 wt% in the depositional soil ma-
terial to as low as 8.32 wt% within the relict soil material.
During erosion and weathering of itabirite by chemical
action, there is normally the leaching and dissolution of
silica. The low silica value within the relict and erosional
soil material indicate the high rate of supergene wea-
thering with silica leaching. The sharp decrease in silica
content within the relict and erosional regimes is as a
remains fairly constant in the depositional regolith ma-
consequence of itabirite destruction, but it increases or
terial due to addition of quartz, possibly from colluvial
material. Fe concentration increases from average of
46.18 wt% in the depositional soil material to as much as
79.08 wt% in the relict regolith regime with variation
due to supergene weathering. Iron concentration within
the Mbalam fresh itabirite from 43.88 wt% to 94.19 wt%
(Appendix I) with a mean of 60.36 wt% (Table 1).
Aluminium averages 1.08 wt% in the fresh itabirite,
6.84 wt% in the relict, 18.48 wt% in the erosional and8.94
wt% in the depositional regolith regimes (Table 1). The
samples with high alumina values indicate high rate of
alteration or decomposition of the parent itabirite rock
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
22
Table 1. Average major, trace and REE composition of itabirite (MB), relict (MR), erosional (ME), and depositional (MD)
soil samples from Mbalam regolith.
˚ DL MB
(n = 6) MR
(n = 12) ME (n
= 12) MD
(n = 12)
DL MB
(n = 6) MR
(n = 12) ME
(n = 12) MD
(n = 12)
Major & minor oxides (wt %) Trace elements (ppm or ppb)
SiO2 0.01 37.40 8.32 11.60 36.79 Ag 0.10 0.13 0.24 0.63 0.19
TiO2 0.01 0.03 0.22 0.51 0.35
As 0.50 0.73 5.75 7.20 3.88
Al2O3 0.01 1.08 6.84 18.48 9.68
Au 1.00 2.83 1.58 0.83 1.57
Fe2O3 0.04 60.36 79.08 57.39 46.18 Ba 1.00 154.17 73.42 69.83 216.58
MnO 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.09 Be 1.00 1.08 1.21 0.50 0.71
MgO 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.04 Bi 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.31 0.23
CaO 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02
Cd 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Na2O 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03
Co 0.20 1.75 1.95 1.73 5.08
K2O 0.01 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.28 Cs 0.10 0.21 0.30 0.12 0.42
P2O5 0.01 0.09 0.20 0.26 0.13 Cu 0.10 4.13 10.13 13.37 37.78
Cr2O3 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 Ga 0.50 1.59 8.07 18.53 12.28
LOI -5.10 0.73 5.07 11.53 6.23
Hf 0.10 0.21 2.41 7.00 2.68
TOT/C 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.15 0.13
Hg 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.17 0.04
TOT/S 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02
Mo 0.10 0.30 1.72 2.44 1.55
Nb 0.10 0.45 5.10 12.57 4.58
Ni 0.10 3.75 5.85 3.66 10.72
Pb 0.10 0.58 6.22 7.55 12.32
Rare earth elements (ppm) Pd 0.50 0.25 0.72 1.48 0.76
La 0.10 2.88 18.66 35.19 11.69
Pt 0.10 0.23 1.75 1.10 2.79
Ce 0.10 4.65 35.75 68.26 35.59
Rb 0.10 2.03 2.57 0.89 6.78
Pr 0.02 0.64 4.23 7.88 2.68
Sb 0.10 0.05 0.33 0.43 0.17
Nd 0.30 2.62 16.66 30.23 10.68 Sc 1.00 1.42 11.08 15.67 18.33
Sm 0.05 0.69 3.11 5.22 1.97 Se 0.50 0.29 0.30 0.53 0.45
Eu 0.02 0.44 0.92 1.18 0.59 Sn 1.00 0.50 0.96 2.21 0.88
Gd 0.05 1.04 2.97 4.29 1.80 Sr 0.50 31.75 29.24 39.00 12.48
Tb 0.01 0.19 0.48 0.63 0.30
Ta 0.10 0.05 0.31 0.88 0.29
Dy 0.05 1.25 2.52 3.17 1.66
Th 0.20 0.28 5.09 13.42 4.58
Ho 0.02 0.29 0.48 0.56 0.32
Tl 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Y 0.10 10.87 13.62 14.73 8.98 U 0.10 0.36 2.38 2.79 1.66
Er 0.03 0.91 1.30 1.45 0.92 V 8.00 13.33 116.50 193.25 211.25
Tm 0.01 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.15
W 0.50 1.48 2.68 6.58 1.77
Yb 0.05 0.89 1.20 1.55 0.98
Zn 1.00 2.00 7.08 7.92 20.50
Lu 0.01 0.15 0.18 0.24 0.16
Zr 0.10 7.28 92.36 249.46 99.12
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
formation by chemical weathering. The increase in alu-
mina in the erosional regolith profile (Figure 5) also
reflects the abundance of clay minerals and the low solu-
bility of Al2O3. The low silica concentration is due to the
replacement of kaolinite by geothite during the ‘mot-
tling’ process. This is reflected in the increase in goethite
in such samples.
The fresh itabirite from Mbalam P concentration av-
erages 0.09 wt% with P2O5 mostly associated with vivia-
nite and apatite. The P concentration gradually increases
in the regolith, being on average 0.20 wt% P2O5 in relict,
up to 0.26 wt% in the erosional zone, and 0.12 wt% P 2O5
in the depositional regime.
The Mbalam itabirites are relatively Ti-poor, with a
TiO2 content averaging 0.03 wt%, in the form of ilmenite.
The Mbalam regolith contains on average 0.22 wt% TiO2
in relict, 0.51 w t% TiO2 in erosional and 0.33 wt% TiO 2
in depositional regolith soil. Titanium is generally im-
mobile in the regolith environment, and is commonly
retained in form of residual rutile after weathering of the
Ti-rich primary minerals. The high concentration of Ti in
the regolith is also due to the stability of secondary Fe
and Ti in the soils. The alkali elements (Na2O + K2O ) ar e
neither abundant in the Mbalam itabirite nor in the mod-
ified regolith soils. Potassium shows slight enrichment in
the depositional regimes with mean of 0.28 wt% which
also reflects possible input from colluvial material.
4.4. Compa tible Trace Elements: Cr, M n, Ni, Cu,
Zn, V, U, Au
In the regolith environment, abundance of these compa-
tible elements is determined by the stability of their sec-
ondary host phases. Most of the Cr in the fresh itabirite is
hosted by chromite, which is comparatively stable in the
regolith. Due to its stability, Cr persists throughout the
weathering process whereas Mn, Ni and Cu are mobile
due to dissolution occurring in redox conditions observed
during lateritic weathering. Vanadium shows residual
enr ichment in all the weathering regimes. Manganese is
highly mobile in the regolith, responding strongly to
changing eH and pH conditions. The manganese content
in the relict and erosional regimes remain similar to the
least altered itabirite and high-grade ore of Mbalam but
shows enrichment up to average of 0.09 wt% MnO in the
depositional regolith. The enrichment of Mn in the depo-
sitional regolith zone is considered to be due to precipi-
tation of secondary or residual Mn oxides at the past re-
dox front. Several other elements, including Co, Ni and
Cu, have peak concentrations in the depositional zone
and appear to have co-precipitated with or substituted in
Mn oxides. Copper shows greater retention or concentra-
tion (mean of 10.15 ppm) in the relict than Co (1.95
ppm); the same trend of retention for these elements is
observed in the erosion and depositional regolith samples.
Concentrations of these elements are low, relative to Cr
and Mn, in those regimes due to poor retention as well as
low primary abundances in the itabirite and high-grade
ores. Nickel, Cu and Co can readily substitute for Fe in
goethite, a common host for those elements in the rego-
lith. The fresh itabirite shows low U content compared to
the regolith regimes. U concentration ranges from mean
of 0.36 ppm in the fresh itabirite to 2.79 ppm in the ero-
sional zone. Gold averages 2.83 ppb in the fresh itabirite,
1.13 ppb in the relict, 0.93 ppb in the erosional and 2.55
ppb in the depositional regolith zone. The low or weak
supergene enrichment of Au in the erosional material
might possibly be related to the strong leaching of the
most ore-related elements resulting in only subtle surface
expression of Au mineralisation.
4.5. Incompatible Trace Elements
The incompatible elements presented in this section in-
clude Nb, Zr, Ta, Hf, Ba, Sr and rare earth elements
(REE). The Mbalam least altered itabirite contains av-
erage concentration of 0.45 ppm Nb, most of which is
likely hosted in Ti-rich minerals s uch as ilmenite or rutile
(Figure 4(a)). Niobium concentrations increase sharply
in the relict and peak in the erosional zone (average of
12.56 ppm). In the depo sitional regime, Nb concentr ation
is lower than in the erosional zone, probably due to dilu-
tion by quartz and secondary goethite precipitation. Tan-
talum shows strong correlation with Nb, maintaining the
least altered itabirite Nb/Ta ratio throughout the regolith
zones (Figure 4(b)).
Zirconium and Hf in the itabirite are hosted mostly in
Ti-bearing minerals most likely zircon. In the Mbalam
regolith, Zr and Hf maintain their least altered rock ratio
and show a strong correlation with TiO2 except in the
depositional zone possibly from the input of zircon from
colluvial or detrital material (Figures 4(c) and (d)).
Barium and Sr have highest concentrations in the least
altered itabirite samples with averages of 31.75 ppm and
154.16 ppm respectively, and progressively leached in
the different regolith regimes with the exception of the
erosional regime where the concentration of Sr (average
39 ppm) is greater than the average of the least altered
itabirite.
Enrichment patterns of La, Ce, Sm and other REE in
the Mbalam regolith are very similar to that of Ti and
associated Nb, Ta and Zr. The REE patterns show sig-
nificant enrichment in Eu in the depositional profile
(Figure 5) although Eu anomalies are obvious in the
erosional. Alkali elements (Rb, Cs ) show higher conce n-
trations in the depositional material and s lightly depleted
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
24
in the relict and erosional regimes which is consistent
with their high solubility and high mobility. Yttrium and
Ho occur in the trivalent oxidation state and have nearly
identical ionic radii. Accordingly, both elements should
display coherent geochemical behaviour but this is not
the case as Y is highly enriched compared to Ho (Table
1). The REE concentrations in the relict regime are con-
sistently lower relative to the depositional zone. REE
enrichment in those regolith regimes maybe due to the
presence of apatite or monazite while those with low
(a)
(b)
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
(c)
(d)
Figure 4. (a) Plot of TiO2 against Nb for regolith materials, i.e. from relict to depositional, derived from itabirite rock; (b)
Plot of Nb against Ta for regolith samples derived from Mbalam itabirite; (c) Plot of TiO2 against Zr for all regolith samples
from relict to depositional samples, outlined by dashed circle, contain possibly additional Zr derived from colluvial or detrital
material; (d) A similar plot of Zr against Hf for all samples.
REE content may be due to the presence of allanite.
Generally the itabirite show low values of Ce/ΣREE,
Ce/La, and La/Yb (Figure 6) while the regolith soil
show relatively high ΣREE and this might be due to the
upward remobilisation from the lower primary BIF and
the downward leaching of the upper mineralised horizons
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
26
Figure 5. Rare earth element plots of regolith samples normalized to Upper Crust after Taylor and McLennan (1984).
Figure 6. Histogram showing the REE behaviour among the
different regolith regimes.
by the descending e pigeneti c s ol utions.
4.6. Mineralogy
The mineralogy (element-mineral association) of th e dif-
ferent regolith samples are represented by XRD patterns
of Figure 7. The XRD patterns for whole-rock regolith
samples from the relict regime (Figure 7 (a)) ind icate the
predominance or moderate to significant presence of
hematite, goethite and kaolinite with minor presence of
gibbsite. Goethite and kaolinite peaks are observed to
range from moderate to significant amount, indicating
the high intensity of weathering of the relict regolith.
Patterns from the erosional regime material show do-
minance of hematite and kaolinite (Figure 7(b)) which
reflect the high rate of leaching in this zone. Due to high
leaching within the Mbalam regolith environment, silica
occurs as a minor phase and peaks are discerned only in
the depositional material. Clay minerals identified were
gibbsite and kaolinite. Gibbsite was detected only as
moderate in one sample from erosional materials while
kaolinite occurs as minor to moderate amount in the re-
lict and erosional regime but completely absent in the
depositional region. The appearance of gibbsite points to
extensive mineral alteration in response to weathering
and it is important to note that this mineral appears in the
erosional regime material. Identification of secondary
minerals was difficult, because their peaks tended to be
obscured by the greater peaks of the major minerals he-
matite, goethite, kaolinite, and gibbsite. The XRD peaks
for the erosion and depositional material are noisy, in-
dicative of the abundance of amorphous contents.
5. Discussion
The relict regime over the Mbalam itabirite is dominated
by hematite, goethite, kaolinite and gibbsite. It shows
strong leaching with preservation of primary texture or
relict lamination. Quartz which is an essential component
of the Mbalam itabirite is leache d relatively fast and only
M. T. NFORBA ET AL. 19
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
(a)
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
28
(b)
(c)
Figure 7. (a) Representative XRD patterns of relict regolith material from Mbalam. On the plots Ka refers to Kaolinite and
Go refers to Goethite; (b) XRD pattern of the erosional regolith material from Mbalam. Ka = Kaolinite, Gi = Gibbsite and He
= Hematite; (c) XRD pattern for Mbalam depositional regolith material.
M. T. NFORBA ET AL. 19
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
appears as disseminated minor components in the relict
regime. The erosional regime typically shows a vermi-
cular to massive and/or friable biscuit-like texture rich in
hematite, goethite and kaolinite. The depositional por-
tions are covered by canga or loose scree with patches of
silcrete. Gibbsite and goethite are typical phases in the
degradation process of the lateritic crust in humid cli-
mate and well drained environment. The high kaolinite
content in the Mbalam top soil ( Fig ure 7) sugg est that in
this region, this mineral might not only be a relict from
the parent rock, but also a neoformed mineral since fer-
ruginization and aluminization imply a desilication
process [20]. This also demonstrates that desilication is
one of the dominant processes during soil development
regardless of the type of bedrock [21]. As expected from
weathered rocks, concentration of the major and minor
elements varies substantially in response to progressive
weathering, leaching and precipitation of the secondary
phases within various regolith regimes. Because Fe is the
least mobile of the major elements, the Fe oxides become
significant phases and control the distributions of many
elements. Manganese and Fe oxides and/or oxyhydrox-
ides are often referred to as active trace-element sinks
[22]. In the present study, the distribution of many trace
elements in the regolith is control by their strong affini-
ties for Mn and Fe oxides and/or oxyhydroxides. Trace
elements that show a greater affinity for Mn include Co,
Ni, Zn and to a lesser extent Pb. Conversely, silica,
which is found in the depositional regolith, may act as a
diluent to other elements [4] where it precipitate as
quartz in cracks or voids. Concentrations of Ca, Na and
K in the regolith products and the fresh itabirite are ex-
tremely low and they are even significantly lower than
those in the advanced zone [23,24]. On the contrary,
concentrations of Al, Fe and Ti are higher in the regolith
products (Table 1), which suggests that the chemical
weathering intensity in this environment could be cata-
gorised as extreme [23,24]. The P concentration or
enrichment is consistent with its mobile nature in the
regolith environment. The increase in P concentration
from the relict to depositional regime might possibly be
related to residual concentration of P as phosphate mine-
ralisation. Absorption of P by iron oxides or oxyhydrox-
ides is well known [4,25] and appears to be the major
mechanism of P retention in the different regolith envi-
ronment. Similar to Al, a slight decrease in the P content
in the relict regime is related to the dilution eff ect due to
goethite precipitation and detrital qua rts.
Gold values in all of the weathering regimes appear to
be sporadic, probably in part reflecting the low level in
the fresh itabirite. However, there is a noticeable
enrichment of Au in the deposition regime. Au disper-
sion in the weathering profile occurs by two possible
mechanisms: (1) mechanical—weathering and subse-
quent erosion of the surface with lateral migration of
mineralised fragments. Mechanical dispersion is particu-
larly characteristic of prolonged weathering with marked
seasonal variation [26] as at Mbalam, (2) hydromor-
phic—dis- solution and transport of Au in solution and at
Mbalam this is reflected by the high Au concentration in
the de- position regimes compared to the relict and ero-
sion surfaces. Within the regolith mantle, Au contents
and spatial distributions or occurrences are different from
the parent itabirite. This fact proves that Au distribution
in the weathered regolith mantle is controlled mechani-
cally, that is both by initial mechanical patterns and su-
perimposed hydromorphic weathering processes. Differ-
ent conclusions have been drawn for Au distribution
during itabirite weathering at Maquine mine [27] where
Au contents and spatial distribution in the weathering
mantle was similar to the parent itabirite and the Au
grains di d not present any surficial strain.
Of the major and minor elements Al, Ti and Zr are
generally considered the least mobile during chemical
weatheri ng. Chemically one of t he dominant Zr-containing
minerals, zircon, is considered to be highly mobile. In
fact one of the oldest mineral found on earth is zircon
[28]. Although Ti-containing minerals such as rutile or
ilmenite have been used as index of weathering, those
minerals appear to be relatively more susceptible to
chemical weathering and leaching than Zr. Significant
amounts of Ti and Zr are typ ically fixed in resistate min-
erals such as zircon, rutile and ilmenite. In the Mbalam
regolith, Zr maintains a positive correlation with Al and
Ti indicating chemical weathering in the sou rce area and
resulting in a relative concentration of those residual
elements [29]. Accordingly, Al/Ti values in some depo-
sitional samples are very low, indicating that these sam-
ples contain more Ti than Al. This geochemical feature is
attributed to the supply of detrital materials with high
Ti-bearing minerals to the site of deposition, because the
Ti-bearing minerals are generally associated with detrital
quartz and zircon. Ti-enriched detrital materials are pos-
sibly formed by Al-Ti fr actionation during: (1) exten sive
chemical weathering, or (2) hydrothermal alteration of
the source rocks [30] Niobium is thought of to be asso-
ciated with Ti-rich minerals in the regolith profiles and
this is support by its positive correlation with Ti. Tanta-
lum also shows strong positive correlation with Nb,
maintaining the fresh rock Nb/Ta ratio throughout the
regolith (Figure 4b). Similar enrichment has been report
[25] of Nb du ring tropic a l weatheri n g of kimberl ite.
6. Rare Earth Element Variations
REE content and ratios are changing vertically according
to the different weathering front (i.e. primary itabirite,
relict, erosion and depositional). Studies [30] showed
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
30
that primary manganese ores after extensive leaching
have very low Eu/Sm ratios (0.16 - 0.31). Therefore pri-
mary or protolith rocks are believed to be rich in Eu,
such result was observed in this study. The regolith ma-
terial from this study also shows Eu enrichment (Figure
5) after supergene modification causing very high Eu/Sm
ratio. Besides that, the fresh itabirite show low values of
Ce/ΣREE, Ce/La and La/Yb (Figure 6). The weathered
material show relatively high ΣREE; this is due to up-
ward remobilisation fro m the lower primary itabirite, and
the downward leaching of the upper mineralisation hori-
zons by the descending epigenetic solutions [30]. The
relict and erosional horizons are characterised by inter-
mediate values of Ce/ΣREE, Ce/La, and low values of
Eu/Sm than those of itabir ite and they exhibit the highest
values of La/Yb values (Figure 6). This might be attri-
buted to higher degree of modification compared with
the itabirite which have lower La/Yb ratio. The low
Eu/Sm values and high La enrichment in this zone indi-
cate the remobilisation of primary minerals and their
re-depo- sition under supergene conditions.
In general from the investigation through the regolith
material we noticed an upward increase in Ce, Ce/La,
Ce/ΣREE, in the same time an upward decrease in
Eu/Sm ratio. All those trends are in agreement w ith each
other and would indicate an increasing upward remobili-
sation under oxic conditions, as the upward increase of
Ce/La and Ce/ΣREE ratios are good indicators for ongo-
ing oxic diagenesi s .
7. Conclusions
We can draw the following conclusions from this study:
The Mbalam regolith has three main un its: relict, er o-
sion and deposition. Itabirite, the protolith progres-
sively weathered into hematite, goethite, kaolinite,
gibbsite. Quartz is minor but visually occurs as dis-
seminated sugary textured fragments within the dif-
ferent regolith units.
The geochemical and mineralogical investigation of
the regolith material indicates that the re has been sig-
nificant leaching of metals and distribution of re-
maining geochemical signatures into Fe oxides. He-
matite and goethite are the major hosts to major ele-
ments.
Regolith material shows relatively high con centration
of Ti due to the resistant nature of the residual rutile
as opposed to the fresh itabirite where Ti is retained
in less resistant mineral ilmenite.
In the Mbalam regolith, Zr maintains a positive cor-
relation with Al and Ti indicating chemical weather-
ing in the source area and resulting in a relative con-
centration of those residual elements.
At Mbalam, Au distribution in the weathered regolith
mantle is controlled mechanically, that is both by in i-
tial mechanical patterns and superimposed hydro-
morphic weathering processes.
The weathered material show relatively high ΣREE;
this is due to upward remobilisation from the lower
primary itabirite, and the downward leaching of the
upper mineralisation horizons by the descending epi-
genetic solutions.
8. Acknowledgement
This article is part of PhD thesis on regolith geochemi-
stry applied to mineral exploration at the University of
Yaoundé I by NMT. We acknowledge the support of
colleagues at the University over the years. This work
was undertaken within the framework of economic ge-
ology research at the University of Buea “The Precam-
brian mineral belt of Cameroon” in collaboration with
other institutions. This article benefited from reviews by
Scott Keith. This and the editorial comments of the Edi-
tor are highly appreciated.
9. References
[1] C. R. M. Butt and R. E. Smith, Characteristic of the
Weathering Profile,” In: C. R. M. Butt, & H. Zeegers, Ed.,
Chapter III.3: Semiarid and arid terrains. Regolith Explo-
ration Geochemistry in Tropical and Subtropical Terrains,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 299-304.
[2] C. R. M Butt and H. Zeegers, Regolith Exploration
Geochemistry in Tropical and Subtropical Terrains,
(Handbook of Exploration Geochemistry,)” Elsevier,
Amsterdam, Vol. 4, 1992, p. 607.
[3] C. R. M. Butt, M. J. Linte rn, and R. R. Anand, “Evolution
of Regoliths and Landscapes in Deeply Weathered Ter-
rain—Implication for Geochemical Exploration,” Ore
Geology Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 3-4, 2000, pp. 167-183.
doi:10.1016/S0169-1368(99)00029-3
[4] M. A. Craig, “Regolith Mapping for Geochemical Ex-
ploration in the Yilgran Craton, Western Australia,”
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, Vol.
1, 2001, pp. 383-390. doi:10.1144/geochem.1.4.383
[5] N. W. Brand, and C. R. M. Butt, “Weathering, Element
Distribution and Geochemical Dispersion at Mt Keith,
Western Australia: Implication for Nickel Sulphide Ex-
ploration,” Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Ana-
lysis, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2001, pp. 391-407.
doi:10.1144/geochem.1.4.391
[6] G. Achoundong, Vegetation,” In: N. Houstin and C.
Seignobos, Ed., Atlas of Cameroon’ Les Éditions Jeune
Afrique, Paris, 2007, pp. 64-65.
[7] M. Tsaléfac, Climate,” In: N. Houstin and C. Seignobos,
Ed., Atlas of Cameroon, Les Éditions Jeune Afrique,
Paris, 2007, pp. 62-63.
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
[8] R. J. Thomas, C. Chevalier and J.F. Makanga, “Precam-
brian Geology and Metallogeny of Gabon,Journal of
African Earth Science, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 78-79.
[9] J. P. Milesi, S. F. Toteu, Y. Deschamps, J. L. Feybesse, C.
Lerouge, A. Cocherie, J. Penaye, R. Tchameni, G.
Moloto-A-Kenguemba, H. A. B. Kampunzu, N. Nicol, E.
Duguey, J. M. Leistel, M. Saint-Martin, F. Ralay, C.
Heinry, V. Bouchot, J. C. Doumnang Mbaigane, V.
Kanda Kula, F. Chene, J. Monthel, P. Boutin, and J.
Cailteux, “An Overview of the Geology and Major Ore
Deposits of Central Africa: Explanatory Note for the
1:4,000,000 Map ‘Geology and major ore deposits of
Central Africa’,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, Vol.
44, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 571-595.
doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.10.016
[10] S. F. Toteu, W. R. Van Schmus, J. Penaye and J. B.
Nyobe, “U-Pb and Sm-Nd Evidence for Eburnian and
Pan-African High-Grade Metamorphism in Cratonic
Rocks of Southern Cameroon,” Precambrian Research,
Vol. 67, No. 3-4, 1994, pp. 321-347.
doi:10.1016/0301-9268(94)90014-0
[11] S. F. Toteu, W. R. Van Schmus, J. Penaye and A. Mich-
ard, “Preliminary U-Pb and Sm-Nd Geochronologic Data
on the North-Central Cameroon: Contribution of an Ar-
chean and Paleo-Proterozoic Crust to the Edification of
an Active Domain of the Pan-African Oroge ny,” Acadé-
mie des Sciences, Vol. 319, 1994, pp. 1519-1524.
[12] D. Soba, A. Michard, S. F. Toteu, D. I. Norman, J.
Penaye, V. Ngako, J. P. Nzenti and D. Dautel, “Donnes
Geochronologiques Nouvelles (Rb/Sr, U/Pb and Sm/Nd)
sur la Zone Mobile Panafricaine de l’Est-Cameroun: Age
Protérozoique Supérieur de la Série de Lom,” Comptes
Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Vol. 312, 1991, pp.
1453-1458.
[13] V. Ngako, P. Affaton, J. M. Nnange, and T. H. Njanko,
“Pan-African Tectonic Evolution in Central and Southern
Cameroon: Transpression and Transtension during Sini-
stral Shear Movements,” Journal of African Earth
Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2003, pp. 207-214.
doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00023-X
[14] S. F. Toteu, J. Penaye, and Y. P. Djomani, Geodymanic
Evolution of the Pan-African Belt in Central Africa with
Special Reference to Cameroon,” Canadian Journal of
Earth Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004, pp. 73-85.
doi:10.1139/e03-079
[15] E. P. Oliveira, S. F. Toteu, M. N. C. Arau´jo, M. J. Car-
valho, R. S. Nascimento, J. F. Bueno, N. McNaughton
and G. Basilici, “Geologic Correlation between the Neo-
proterozoic Sergipano Belt (NE Brazil) and the Yaounde
belt (Cameroon, Africa),” Journal of African Earth sci-
ences, Vol. 44, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 470-478.
doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.014
[16] S. F. Toteu, R. Y. Foutateu, J. Penaye, J. Tchakount e, A.
C. S. Mouangue, W. R. Van Schmus, E. Deloule, and H.
Stendal, “U-Pb Dating of Plutonic Rocks Involved in the
Nappe Tectonic in Southern Cameroon: Consequence for
the Pan-African Orogenic Evolution of the Central Afri-
can Fold Belt,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, Vol.
44, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 479-493.
doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.015
[17] S. F. Toteu, J. Penaye, E. Deloule, W. R. Van Schmus,
and R. Tchameni, “Diachronous Evolution of Volcano-
Sedimentary Basins North of the Congo Craton: Insights
from U-Pb Ion Microprobe Dating of Zircons from the
Poli, Lom and Yaoundé Groups (Cameroon),” Journal of
African Earth Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 4-5, 2006, pp. 428-
442. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.011
[18] C. R. M. Butt, M. J. Lintern and R. R. Anand, “Evolution
of Regoliths and Landscapes in Deeply Weathered Ter-
rain—Implication for Geochemical Exploration,” In: A.
G. Gubins, Ed., Proceedings of Exploration 97: Fourth
Decennial International Conference on Mineral Explora-
tion, 1997, pp. 323-334.
[19] R. E. Smith, R. R. Anand and N. F. Alley, Use and Im-
plication of Paleoweathering Surfaces in Mineral Explo-
ration,” In A.G. Gubins, Ed., Proceedings of Exploration
97: Fourth Decennial International Conference on Min-
eral Exploration, 1997, pp. 335-346.
[20] M. Cornelius, R. E. Smith, and A. J. Cox,Laterite Geo-
chemistry for Regional Exploration Surveys—A Review,
and Sampling Strategies,Geochemistry: Exploration, En-
vironment, Analysis, Vol. 1, 2001, pp. 211-220.
doi:10.1144/geochem.1.3.211
[21] A. M. C. Horbe and M. L. da Costa, Lateritic Crusts and
Related Soils in the Eastern Brazilian Amazonia,Ge-
oderma, Vol. 126, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 225-239.
doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.09.011
[22] O. Neung-Hwan and D. D. Richter, “Elemental Translo-
cation and Loss from Three Highly Weathered Soil-
Bedrock Profiles in the Southeastern United States,” Ge-
oderma, Vol. 126, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 5-25.
doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.11.005
[23] Jin-liang Feng, “Trace Elements in Ferromanganese
Concretions, Gibbsite Spots, and the Surrounding Terra
Rossa overlying Dolomite: their Mobilization, Redistri-
bution and Fractionation,” Journal of Geochemical Ex-
ploration, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2011, pp. 99-111.
doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.10.010
[24] H. W. Nesbitt, and G. M. Young, ‘Petrogenesis of Sedi-
ments in the Absence of Chemical Weathering: Effec ts of
Abrasion and Sorting on Bulk Composition and Miner-
alogy,Sedimentology, Vol. 43, 1996, pp. 341-358.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-3091.1996.d01-12.x
[25] H. W. Nesbitt, G. M. Young, S. M. McLennan and R. R.
Keays, “Effects of Chemical Weathering and Sorting on
the Petrogenesis of Siliciclastic Sediments, with Implica-
tions for Provenance Studies,” Journal of Geology, Vol.
104, No. 5, 1996, pp. 525-542. doi:10.1086/629850
[26] B. Singh and M. Cornelius, Geochemistry and Mineral-
ogy of the Regolith Profile over the Aries Kimberlite Pipe,
Western Australia,Geochemistry: Exploration, Envi-
ronment, Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2006, pp. 311-323.
doi:10.1144/1467-7873/06-113
[27] R. J. Bowell, E. O. Alreh, N. d’A. Laffoley, E. Hanssen,
S. Abe, R. K. Yao and D. Pohl, “Geochemical Explora-
tion for Gold in Tropical Soils—Four Contrasting Case
Studies from West Africa,” Transactions of the Institu-
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
32
tion of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Applied Earth
Science, Vol 105, 1996, pp. B12-B33.
[28] C. A. C. Varajao, F. Colin, P. Vieillard, A. J. Melfi and D.
Nahon, “Early Weathering of Palladium Gold under Lat-
eritic Conditions, Maquine Mine, Minas Gerais, Brazil,”
Applied Geochemist ry , Vol. 15, No. 2,2000, pp. 245-263.
doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00038-4
[29] S. A. Wilde, J. W. Valley, W. H. Peck and C. M. Graham,
“Evidence from Detrital Zircons for the Existence of
Continental Cr ust and Oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago,”
Nature, Vol. 409, pp. 175-178. doi:10.1038/35051550
[30] A. Dokuz and E. Tanyolu, “Geochemical Constraints on
the Provenance, Mineral Sorting and Subaerial Weather-
ing of lower Jurassic and Upper ssCretaceous clastic
Rocks of the Eastern Pontides, Yusufeli (Artvin), NE
Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 15, 2006,
pp. 181-209.
[31] K. Sugitani, Y. Horiuchi, M. Adachi and R. Sugisaki,
“Anomalously low Al2O3/TiO2 Values for Archean
Cherts from the Pilbara Block, Western Australia—Pos-
sible Evidence for Extensive Chemical Weathering on the
Early Earth,” Precambrian Research, Vol. 80, 1996, pp.
49-76.
[32] T. El-Hasan, A. Al-Malabeh, and K. Komuro, “Rare
Earth Elements Geochemistry of the Cambrian Shallow
Marine Manganese Deposit at Wadi Dana, South Jordan,”
Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008, pp. 45-52.
doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00005-8
Appendix 1: Major, trace and REE composition of itabirite, relict, erosional, and depositional soil samples from Mbalam
regolith.
Sample
MB1
MB2 Itabirite
MB3
MB4
MB5
MB6
MR1
MR2 Relict
MR3
MR4
MR5
MR6
MR7
MR8
SiO2 51.50 43.43 4.99 51.23 32.62 40.65 21.27 5.25 7.58 1.35 11.05 5.38 6.59 3.63
Al2O3 2.46 0.06 0.16 2.47 0.18 1.17 2.25 13.33 5.11 3.06 8.07 9.10 3.78 0.91
Fe2O3 43.88 55.87 94.19 44.48 66.33 57.40 74.69 72.06 83.42 92.41 73.61 79.66 85.90 94.15
MgO 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
CaO 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03
Na2O 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02
K2O 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.28 0.31 0.05 0.01
TiO2 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.25 0.16 0.09 0.26 0.25 0.17 0.03
P2O5 0.15 0.02 0.07 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.37 0.09 0.15 0.06
MnO 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
Cr2O3 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.04
LOI 1.5 0.5 0.4 1.2 0.5 0.3 1.4 8.8 3.3 2.8 6.1 5.0 3.2 1.0
TOT/C 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.20 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.71 0.14
TOT/S 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Sum 99.9 99.9 99.85 99.91 99.87 99.94 99.87 99.88 99.79 99.88 99.84 99.87 99.86 99.85
Sc 2 0.5 1 2 1 2 6 16 7 8 22 8 5 3
Ba 219 4 129 212 355 6 25 28 290 42 111 33 70 41
Be 2.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 2.0 2 2
Co 1.7 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.8 3.3 1.7 1.3 1.9 1.1 4.9 0.7 2.3 3.0
Cs 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.5 0.2 0.1
Ga 3.0 0.3 0.9 2.6 1.0 1.8 3.0 8.0 7.9 3.0 9.2 7.1 6.7 1.8
Hf 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.9 3.1 1.5 0.8 1.7 1.9 2.2 0.3
Nb 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.5 2.4 5.6 3.1 2.4 4.4 5.5 4.1 0.6
Rb 4.2 0.1 0.2 4.3 0.2 3.2 1.4 1.3 3.6 1.1 6.8 8.4 2.0 0.4
Sn 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5
Sr 52.9 1.3 4.5 50.9 77.1 3.8 16.4 17.0 54.4 24.6 25.7 19.8 39.2 18.8
Ta 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1
Th 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.3 1.7 5.6 2.6 1.5 3.8 4.3 4.2 0.3
U 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 1.6 2.0 2.8 1.2 3.6 2.2 1.3 0.7
V 19 4 9 21 15 12 77 102 120 53 165 68 99 33
W 1.7 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.3 0.5 3.5 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.3 3.5 2.3 2.0
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
Sample
MB1
MB2
Itabirite
MB3
MB4
MB5
MB6
MR1
MR2
Relict
MR3
MR4
MR5
MR6
MR7
MR8
Zr 17.3 0.7 2.2 14.4 0.8 8.3 34.6 112.3 77.9 32.3 75.2 81.7 80.4 8.6
Y 8.2 6.9 23.5 7.9 11.4 7.3 12.1 10.7 19.2 10.3 14.6 9.9 10.3 12.5
La 5.1 0.5 2.6 5.0 0.6 3.5 13.3 19.5 24.2 13.2 23.4 12.4 19.4 12.7
Ce 6.6 0.7 5.3 8.0 1.2 6.1 22.5 38.9 47.5 26.9 44.4 23.8 35.8 25.8
Pr 1.10 0.13 0.62 1.03 0.16 0.77 2.70 4.73 5.44 3.40 5.00 2.58 3.73 3.38
Nd 4.1 0.6 2.7 4.0 0.9 3.4 9.2 18.9 20.1 14.4 20.2 10.6 13.3 13.5
Sm 0.87 0.30 1.05 0.82 0.55 0.56 1.93 3.00 4.51 3.00 3.70 2.17 1.98 2.62
Eu 0.43 0.26 0.82 0.43 0.42 0.29 0.73 0.87 1.33 0.97 0.99 0.83 0.58 0.83
Gd 0.96 0.58 2.05 0.93 1.09 0.64 2.14 2.42 5.23 2.87 3.51 1.90 1.79 2.67
Tb 0.17 0.11 0.39 0.17 0.20 0.12 0.35 0.33 0.89 0.42 0.54 0.33 0.27 0.43
Dy 0.99 0.70 2.66 1.00 1.22 0.92 1.94 1.76 4.41 2.02 3.14 1.93 1.64 2.24
Ho 0.25 0.19 0.63 0.24 0.26 0.18 0.41 0.36 0.77 0.36 0.54 0.36 0.35 0.41
Er 0.82 0.55 1.95 0.74 0.80 0.58 1.06 0.96 1.78 0.94 1.46 1.02 1.01 1.08
Tm 0.13 0.09 0.34 0.13 0.14 0.10 0.16 0.15 0.23 0.14 0.22 0.17 0.13 0.14
Yb 0.75 0.54 1.93 0.75 0.84 0.55 1.03 0.94 1.32 0.84 1.30 1.04 0.77 0.84
Lu 0.11 0.08 0.33 0.11 0.14 0.10 0.15 0.16 0.20 0.12 0.20 0.16 0.12 0.12
Mo 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 2.0 1.9 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.3 2.5 0.6
Cu 5.2 2.9 2.0 4.1 8.2 2.4 2.6 4.4 7.0 9.7 13.1 2.4 8.1 5.7
Pb 1.3 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.4 0.3 2.5 3.4 8.1 2.9 8.9 4.0 6.3 2.2
Zn 3.0 0.5 0.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 12.0 3.0 6.0 2.0
Ni 4.0 2.6 3.0 4.4 3.6 4.9 5.4 3.3 7.9 3.3 6.7 3.1 9.4 10.2
As 1.8 0.3 0.3 1.6 0.3 0.3 6.3 4.0 2.6 1.7 4.3 1.1 9.6 3.0
Cd 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sb 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1
Bi 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
Ag 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2
Au 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.0 2.3
Hg 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.01
Tl 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Se 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Au 1.0 0.5 0.5 12.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 - -
Pt 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 4.2 2.2 0.4 2.5 0.8 - -
Pd 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.1 0.3 1.2 0.6 - -
ΣREE 30.6 12.2 46.9 31.3 19.9 25.1 69.7 103.7 137.1 79.9 123.2 69.2 91.2 79.3
Ce/ΣREE 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3
Eu/Sm 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3
Ce/La 1.3 1.4 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0
La/Yb 6.8 0.9 1.3 6.7 0.7 6.4 12.9 20.7 18.3 15.7 18.0 11.9 25.2 15.1
Appendix 1 ( continued)
Sample
MR9
Relict
MR10
MR11
MR12
ME1
ME2
ME3
ME4
Erosion
ME5
ME6
ME7
ME8
ME9
ME10
SiO2 8.64 2.90 2.29 23.89 29.66 17.64 0.99 0.81 18.18 1.13 1.34 7.91 22.06 31.86
Al2O3 3.38 5.58 5.19 22.29 24.51 31.16 7.87 3.55 34.62 8.50 8.01 15.24 23.29 31.46
Fe2O3 84.08 80.68 88.85 39.45 31.47 32.57 84.91 88.75 26.85 83.66 80.87 64.79 39.60 19.56
MgO 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
CaO 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Na2O 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
K2O 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.03
TiO2 0.12 0.21 0.06 0.96 0.94 0.76 0.18 0.07 0.78 0.17 0.17 0.58 0.83 0.77
P2O5 0.33 0.88 0.08 0.11 0.12 0.19 0.12 0.84 0.20 0.14 0.25 0.34 0.16 0.12
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
34
Sample
MR9
Relict
MR10
MR11
MR12
ME1
ME2
ME3
ME4
Erosion
ME5
ME6
ME7
ME8
ME9
ME10
MnO
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Cr
2
O
3
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
LOI
3.3
9.5
3.4
13.0
13.0
17.4
5.8
5.8
19.1
6.2
9.2
10.9
13.7
16.0
TOT/C
0.18
0.16
0.05
0.10
0.16
0.33
0.12
0.10
0.18
0.19
0.21
0.09
0.11
0.12
TOT/S
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.01
Sum
99.86
99.85
99.88
99.76
99.81
99.79
99.9
99.87
99.8
99.83
99.86
99.80
99.81
99.84
Sc
12
20
5
21
18
23
9
10
17
7
16
26
19
17
Ba
55
122
26
38
56
54
27
43
27
32
21
155
54
57
Be
2
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Co
2.5
1.0
1.1
1.9
2.2
1.5
1.1
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.7
1.8
Cs
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
Ga
3.5
6.8
2.3
37.5
29.9
27.7
6.1
3.3
34.9
5.4
6.9
23.6
27.7
31.8
Hf
1.0
1.9
0.9
12.7
10.9
11.9
3.8
1.7
10.4
2.6
4.1
6.6
8.9
7.9
Nb
2.6
6.5
1.9
22.1
22.8
18.0
5.0
2.5
17.8
5.0
5.1
14.2
19.4
18.3
Rb
1.5
2.9
0.7
0.7
2.1
0.6
0.1
0.3
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.5
3.1
1.5
Sn
0.5
1
0.5
5
4.0
3.0
0.5
0.5
3.0
0.5
1
3
3
4
Sr
26.5
66.7
16.4
25.4
31.6
35.2
16.3
40.6
27.7
14.7
15.7
36.7
30.2
37.1
Ta
0.2
0.4
0.1
1.4
1.5
1.2
0.4
0.2
1.4
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.4
1.3
Th
1.6
4.0
1.7
29.8
21.7
20.2
6.5
3.3
24.7
5.5
10.5
12.7
17.9
17.6
U
6.7
2.0
1.4
3.1
3.1
3.1
1.2
2.6
2.8
1.6
2.4
4.1
3.3
2.9
V
56
66
27
532
289
325
56
56
283
64
87
303
339
309
W
1.1
2.8
5.7
4.0
3
2.3
2.2
1.5
2
8.4
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.2
Zr
30.6
73.2
32.1
469.4
381.4
472.6
117
53.8
370
88.1
122.6
230.9
336.9
284.6
Y
20.9
15.2
12.8
14.9
15.3
15.1
7.3
9.5
11.2
4.8
9.7
20.1
14.4
13.4
La
10.5
28.7
10.2
36.4
33.1
38.9
18.9
19.7
29.4
20.9
18.9
39.9
36.9
50.2
Ce
20.4
66.8
17.0
59.2
60.9
75.0
37.1
39.0
48.7
37.7
41.4
80.0
68.6
101.1
Pr
2.24
9.10
2.01
6.48
6.59
8.01
4.01
4.66
5.18
4.45
4.85
9.88
7.98
11.19
Nd
9.8
40.8
7.6
21.5
24.4
28.6
13.1
16.7
17.4
16.4
19.3
38.9
29.4
40.2
Sm
1.89
8.04
1.31
3.21
3.68
4.61
2.07
3.16
2.75
2.43
2.92
6.70
4.15
5.54
Eu
0.68
2.02
0.60
0.65
0.75
0.94
0.58
0.87
0.53
0.62
0.80
1.30
0.76
0.97
Gd
2.32
6.60
1.58
2.62
3.07
3.91
1.74
2.55
2.12
1.61
1.89
5.15
3.03
3.93
Tb
0.42
0.94
0.31
0.47
0.52
0.57
0.25
0.37
0.36
0.22
0.29
0.79
0.49
0.59
Dy
2.64
3.98
1.98
2.56
3.00
3.06
1.19
1.76
2.01
0.91
1.52
3.84
2.54
2.81
Ho
0.68
0.61
0.43
0.53
0.56
0.56
0.25
0.31
0.40
0.16
0.32
0.72
0.50
0.51
Er
2.06
1.49
1.10
1.60
1.56
1.64
0.82
0.85
1.19
0.47
0.85
2.05
1.52
1.57
Tm
0.34
0.20
0.15
0.27
0.28
0.27
0.12
0.13
0.21
0.08
0.15
0.33
0.27
0.25
Yb
2.18
1.25
0.97
1.92
1.80
1.95
0.80
0.84
1.41
0.51
0.94
2.07
1.83
1.75
Lu
0.32
0.18
0.14
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.13
0.12
0.22
0.08
0.15
0.31
0.28
0.28
Mo
2.1
2.5
0.5
5.1
2.1
2.4
0.7
1.3
2.5
0.7
2.9
5.2
3.7
2.5
Cu
20.5
27.4
4.0
16.6
11.0
7.6
4.2
11.8
13.5
8.6
14.9
28.0
15.8
14.8
Pb
4.5
11.0
2.0
18.8
11.1
9.7
2.9
3.1
8.8
3.3
4.9
9.3
13.4
9.0
Zn
12.0
11.0
3.0
19.0
10.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
9.0
6.0
11.0
8.0
Ni
10.6
3.0
3.7
3.6
5.4
2.9
1.3
2.9
5.0
3.4
4.7
2.2
4.1
3.0
As
11.4
5.3
2.3
17.4
5.3
7.5
1.7
1.8
8.4
2.1
5.8
25.8
10.1
5.3
Cd
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Sb
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.5
Bi
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.3
0.9
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.3
Ag
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.5
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.8
1.2
0.4
0.7
1.5
0.1
Au
1.3
3.5
0.3
2.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.3
0.3
1.7
1.0
Hg
0.02
0.19
0.02
0.60
0.20
0.22
0.09
0.10
0.17
0.18
0.25
0.26
0.14
0.09
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
Sample
MR9
Relict
MR10
MR11
MR12
ME1
ME2
ME3
ME4
Erosion
ME5
ME6
ME7
ME8
ME9
ME10
Tl
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Se
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.9
0.3
1.1
0.3
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
Au
-
-
-
-
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.0
0.5
0.5
-
-
-
-
Pt
-
-
-
-
1.9
1.7
0.4
0.6
1.6
0.4
-
-
-
-
Pd
-
-
-
-
2.8
2.2
0.5
0.3
2.9
0.3
-
-
-
-
ΣREE
77.4
185.9
58.2
152.6
155.8
183.4
88.4
100.5
123.1
91.3
104.0
212.0
172.7
234.3
Ce/ΣREE
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
Eu/Sm
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
Ce/La
1.9
2.3
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.8
2.2
2.0
1.9
2.0
La/Yb
4.8
23.0
10.5
19.0
18.4
19.9
23.6
23.5
20.9
41.0
20.1
19.3
20.2
28.7
Appendix I (continued)
Sample
Erosion
ME11
ME12
MD1
MD2
MD3
MD4
Deposition
MD5
MD6
MD7
MD8
MD9
MD10
MD11
MD12
SiO
2
1.33
6.27
36.09
27.19
21.59
30.59
60.88
47.89
43.51
46.51
20.30
7.64
45.48
53.79
Al
2
O
3
15.05
18.52
10.04
12.86
6.01
16.90
16.76
2.38
3.18
17.83
16.14
5.96
2.25
5.83
Fe
2
O
3
73.75
61.89
43.33
49.98
66.68
40.00
12.65
46.82
50.55
23.04
51.83
81.98
50.32
36.97
MgO
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.17
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.10
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.06
CaO
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.13
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
Na
2
O
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.06
K
2
O
0.01
0.02
0.16
0.25
0.13
0.13
0.21
0.29
0.31
0.16
0.12
0.16
0.35
1.03
TiO
2
0.42
0.44
0.34
0.42
0.24
0.61
0.54
0.05
0.14
0.83
0.60
0.19
0.09
0.19
P
2
O
5
0.18
0.42
0.39
0.22
0.17
0.08
0.03
0.12
0.07
0.14
0.15
0.10
0.07
0.04
MnO
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.82
0.02
0.09
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
Cr
2
O
3
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.04
LOI
9.1
12.2
9.4
8.8
5.0
10.9
8.7
1.2
2.0
11.1
10.6
3.8
1.3
1.9
TOT/C
0.06
0.17
0.11
0.10
0.38
0.16
0.15
0.05
0.09
0.21
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.04
TOT/S
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Sum
99.82
99.78
99.85
99.8
99.9
99.77
99.89
99.69
99.88
99.87
99.81
99.87
99.92
99.95
Sc
8
18
26
19
11
36
18
5
5
48
36
8
3
5
Ba
112
200
100
84
65
49
60
1967
52
63
35
64
22
38
Be
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
Co
2.7
1.2
6.3
3.1
2.8
4.0
1.3
21.0
1.7
4.8
7.5
1.8
4.6
2.0
Cs
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.3
0.8
Ga
11.8
13.3
13.4
17.5
8.1
25.5
19.4
3.1
3.5
16.5
25.9
5.9
3.4
5.1
Hf
6.5
8.7
2.9
3.5
1.7
4.1
4.0
0.5
3.4
3.5
3.8
1.7
1.9
1.1
Nb
11.3
11.4
5.3
6.5
3.9
8.3
7.7
1.1
2.5
5.3
6.3
3.9
1.9
2.3
Rb
0.3
0.7
3.6
7.4
7.3
4.2
6.7
8.6
6.6
6.1
3.1
5.1
6.8
15.9
Sn
2
2
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
3.0
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
Sr
54.8
127.4
11.4
15.4
20.1
11.8
7.6
25.8
14.7
3.4
6.5
15.0
12.1
6.0
Ta
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
Th
7.3
13.1
5.0
10.4
2.9
8.2
6.5
1.1
2.8
2.5
9.7
3.3
1.4
1.1
U
2.2
4.2
1.6
2.2
2.6
2.6
2.2
0.7
1.4
1.3
1.6
1.9
1.1
0.7
V
74
134
165
210
117
816
118
21
70
307
562
55
46
48
W
47.0
2.9
2
2.3
2.4
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.9
1.2
2.3
2.1
1.3
1.6
Zr
234
302
112
139
68.7
144
154
22.5
131
115
127
57.2
74.5
41.9
Y
20.9
35.0
10.0
10.2
12.3
6.6
6.2
12.7
8.0
8.5
5.0
10.2
8.7
9.4
La
30.7
84.8
11.4
15.8
14.3
7.0
11.7
12.7
25.5
7.8
8.1
8.2
11.7
6.1
Ce
66.2
163
117.2
30.5
30.8
14.8
20.0
24.0
51.3
72.1
14.4
18.2
22.3
11.5
M. T. NFORBA ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 Sci Res. OJG
36
Sample
Erosion
ME11
ME12
MD1
MD2
MD3
MD4
Deposition
MD5
MD6
MD7
MD8
MD9
MD10
MD11
MD12
Pr
7.97
19.77
2.63
3.32
3.40
1.56
1.95
3.26
6.09
2.21
1.62
1.86
2.65
1.62
Nd
33.7
84.6
10.2
12.6
13.9
5.9
7.4
14.1
23.3
9.1
5.7
7.7
10.9
7.3
Sm
6.29
18.29
2.10
2.40
2.87
1.24
1.37
2.53
3.10
1.89
0.94
1.79
1.94
1.44
Eu
1.48
4.54
0.59
0.73
0.82
0.34
0.50
0.82
0.76
0.47
0.26
0.74
0.52
0.55
Gd
5.44
17
1.94
2.28
2.94
1.11
1.24
2.31
2.03
1.83
0.88
1.87
1.87
1.33
Tb
0.79
2.35
0.34
0.38
0.49
0.21
0.21
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.17
0.30
0.28
0.23
Dy
3.84
11.52
1.93
2.08
2.49
1.26
1.24
1.92
1.74
1.82
1.00
1.71
1.36
1.39
Ho
0.70
1.68
0.39
0.40
0.46
0.26
0.25
0.38
0.27
0.38
0.20
0.34
0.25
0.28
Er
1.97
2.92
1.15
1.09
1.14
0.71
0.67
1.08
0.88
1.19
0.64
0.98
0.70
0.85
Tm
0.31
0.38
0.19
0.19
0.17
0.14
0.11
0.17
0.14
0.20
0.11
0.15
0.11
0.14
Yb
2.08
2.61
1.27
1.07
1.06
0.91
0.67
1.06
0.86
1.55
0.79
0.98
0.70
0.82
Lu
0.31
0.39
0.20
0.17
0.17
0.15
0.12
0.16
0.14
0.27
0.14
0.15
0.11
0.13
Mo
1.3
4.0
1.5
1.6
1.9
4.0
1.9
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.9
1.3
1.1
0.8
Cu
20.5
9.7
36.7
38.8
16.8
65.9
138.4
5.5
2.8
97.1
40.2
6.1
2.9
2.2
Pb
4.1
11.0
18.4
18.7
6.7
25.1
24.4
1.7
4.4
17.1
18.7
6.4
3.3
2.9
Zn
11.0
6.0
57.0
21.0
13.0
26.0
13.0
10.0
5.0
60.0
25.0
9.0
6.0
1.0
Ni
4.9
4.1
16.6
11.0
7.8
13.6
4.7
13.0
5.5
20.4
19.7
5.6
5.5
5.2
As
3.1
9.5
1.9
4.7
3.9
3.9
9.9
4.3
3.3
1.1
4.9
5.4
1.9
1.4
Cd
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Sb
0.3
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.1
Bi
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
Ag
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
Au
0.3
3.0
1.9
3.1
1.4
2.7
3.2
0.6
3.9
1.1
0.3
7.6
1.5
3.3
Hg
0.05
0.30
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.16
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.01
Tl
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Se
<0.5
<0.5
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.9
0.3
0.6
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Au
-
-
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
3.0
0.5
3.0
-
-
-
-
-
Pt
-
-
6.6
6.5
1.5
2.4
1.8
0.2
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
Pd
-
-
0.8
1.1
0.9
0.6
1.2
0.3
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
ΣREE
182
449
161
83.2
87.3
42.2
53.6
77.5
124
109
40.0
55.2
64.1
43.1
Ce/ΣREE
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
Eu/Sm
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
Ce/La
2.2
1.9
10.3
1.9
2.2
2.1
1.7
1.9
2.0
9.2
1.8
2.2
1.9
1.9
La/Yb
14.8
32.5
9.0
14.8
13.5
7.7
17.5
12.0
29.7
5.0
10.3
8.4
16.7
7.4
Major elements as wt%, t race and REE as ppm or ppb. Total Fe as Fe2O3,