Materials Sciences and Applications
Vol. 3  No. 7 (2012) , Article ID: 21161 , 11 pages DOI:10.4236/msa.2012.37066

Surface Photografting of Novel Sulfobetaine Copolymers on Silica

Abhishek Kumar, Nazia Tarannum, Meenakshi Singh*

Department of Chemistry, MMV, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Email: *meenakshi_s4@rediffmail.com

Received March 21st, 2012; revised May 1st, 2012; accepted June 1st, 2012

Keywords: Copolymer, Sulfobetaine; Zwitterionic; Grafted Copolymer; Photopolymerization; Maleimide; Michael-Type Reaction; Surface Initiated Polymerization (SIP); Density Functional Theory (DFT); Fluorescence

ABSTRACT

A couple of novel sulfobetaine copolymer is developed via Michael-type addition reaction. The comonomers, diamines and maleimide react via Michael reaction through UV irradiation using AIBN as photoinitiator producing polyamine chain. Further, sulfobetaine copolymers were obtained on treatment of the polyamine with sulfopropylating agent, 1,3- propane sultone. These novel sulfobetaine polymers were grafted on silica surface to produce responsive biocompatible surface. This easy straightforward, catalyst free facile protocol for synthesis of polymer grafted surface is useful for developing biomedical devices. Additionally, both the copolymers show fluorescence characteristics.

1. Introduction

Surface characteristics of materials involved in wide variety of commercial applications are modified by various laboratory skills, for instance physical deposition of surface-active compounds [1] or by using various “graftingto” techniques [2], through plasma or glow discharge [3- 6], corona discharge [7-9], and γ-ray[10-12] “graftingfrom” techniques. Physical deposition by and large results in noncovalently bound coatings. Developments in UV-induced surface graft polymerization was reviewed by Deng et al. and concluded that surface graft polymerizations induced by UV irradiation exhibit some advantages over other modification methods, e.g., fast reaction rate, low cost of processing, simple equipment, easy industrialization, and may be the most important, the distribution of grafted chains is limited to a shallow region near the surface [13]. Surface photografting polymerization was also found to offer the unique ability to alter and maneuver surface properties with no damage to bulk properties. The pioneering work on photografting polymerization initiated by UV light was published in the 1950s by Oster and coworkers [14]. In view of the significance of the technique and the rapidly extending applications, it is therefore reasonable to attempt photografting of the newly synthesized maleimide copolymers bearing zwitterionic centres on silica particles.

In this work Michael type addition, a reaction traditionally used for the chemical modification of bioactive substances e.g. conjugation of peptides with polymeric substrates, such as PEG [15,16], biofucntional hydrogels [17]; is being attempted for developing responsive, biocompatible surface for biomedical and/or other industrial applications with added advantage of zwitterionic centres by fabricating sulfobetaine polyelectrolytes. Michael addition is one of the valuable and handy strategies for development of novel polymers, in which the nucleophile adds across a carbon-carbon multiple bond and has been employed for the synthesis of linear, graft, hyperbranched, dendritic and network polymers [18]. The advantages of this reaction are numerous, its mild character and high yield in physiological conditions is one of them. Although Michael addition is generally considered the addition of enolate nucleophiles to activated olefins, a wide range of functional groups possess sufficient nucleophilicity to perform as Michael donors. Reactions involving non-enolate nucleophiles such as amines, thiols and phosphines are typically referred to as Michael-type additions. Michael acceptor possesses an electron withdrawing and resonance stabilizing activating group, which stabilizes the anionic intermediate [18]. Here, the -NH2 groups of N-(2-aminoethyl) piperazine/phenylene diamine as nucleophile was condensed with maleimide group which behaves as Michael acceptor possessing electron withdrawing activating group. The maleimide double bond is highly electrophilic due to the two adjacent electron withdrawing carbonyl groups. Copolymerization is possible with a wide range of functional groups due to the variety of chemical reactions possible through the maleimide group. Condensation of maleimide with a range of functional groups is feasible as several chemical reactions are possible through the maleimide group. This study is based on the maleimide/diamine chemistry. With maleimide, reaction occurs through the double bond of maleimide ring. DFT method was used for geometry optimization and energy calculations.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

p-Phenylene diamine and silica gel (pore size 60 Å, 230- 400 mesh) were procured from Sigma Aldrich. Maleimide, N-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine, toluene and ethanol were purchased from Merck. Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was obtained from Otto chemie Pvt.Ltd. 1,3-Propane sultone was purchased from Fluka and 3-amino propyl triethoxysilane was procured from Lancaster Synthesis. All the chemicals were of AR grade and used as received. Water used was triple distilled deionized water (0.05 - 0.08 × 106 S/cm).

2.2. Equipments

Elemental analyses were carried out by Vario EL III CHNS. The infrared spectra of the materials were recorded using Jasco FTIR 5300 from 400 - 4000 cm1. NMR spectra were recorded using JEOL AL300 FTNMR. A chamber fitted with mercury lamp (150W) was used for UV irradiation. A Cary 50 Bio (Varian Instrument Inc., Melbourne Australia) was used for all spectrophotometric measurements. pH of the solutions were determined by Systronics mpH system 361. Scanning electron microscopy was performed by FESEM Quanta 200F at 5 KV in low vacuum. Absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded on JASCO UV-550 spectrophotometer and JASCO FP-777 spectrofluorometer.

2.3. Computational Method

All computer simulations were undertaken by the Gaussian software [19]. Geometry optimization and energy calculations were performed using DFT method at B3LYP/ 6-31G(d,p) level of theory.

2.3.1. N-[2-ammonium Ethyl Piperazinium] Maleimidopropane Sulfonate Copolymer (I)

2.3.1.2. synthesis Equimolar solutions of maleimide [0.9712 g (0.01 mol) in 20.0 mL toluene] and 2-aminoethyl piperazine [1.3118 mL (0.01 mol) in 10.0 mL toluene] were prepared separately. The solutions were mixed and photopolymerized by exposure to UV light using AIBN as initiator. Once polymerized, solution of 1,3-propane sultone [0.8774 mL (0.01 mol) in 5.0 mL toluene] was added to the reaction mixture and continued the reaction process under UV light. Yellow fine crystals were obtained on completion of the reaction and were washed in copious amounts of toluene to remove any unreacted species and dried in oven, mp 180˚C. The product (yield 70%) was washed several times with water also and then dried in vacuo at room temperature. Analysis (%): C = 41.8, H = 6.3, N = 12.4. The indicated structure confirms the theoretical percentages (C = 41.0, H = 6.0, N = 11.9); where molecular weight of a monomer is 468 g/mol with the formula C16H28N4O8S2 including end group. The corresponding structure is shown in Scheme 1.

2.3.1.2. Characterization FTIR (400 - 4000 cm–1, KBr):

3446 (n-NH), 2944 (asym. n-CH2), 2833 (sym n-CH2), 1713 (n-C=O), 1461(scissoring n-CH2), 1179, 1039 (asym, sym n-), 792 (n-C-H), 732 (n-NH wagging).

Scheme 1. Scheme of the polycondensation reaction for the polymer I.

H1 NMR (300MHz, CDCl3, ppm):

d 8.11 (1H, s, N-H), 7.86 (1H, s, N-H+), 3.41(2H, t, -CH2), 3.37 (2H, t, -CH2-N), 2.92 (1H, d, -CH C=O), 2.58 (1H, d), maleimide ring 2.5 (2H, t, (N-CH2) piperazine ring, 2.45 (2H,t) piperazine ring, 1.76 (2H, m, CH2-CH2-).

C13 NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, ppm):

d 178.0 (s, C=O),68.9 (1H, s, CH-NH), 55.8 (2H, t, CH2-NH+), 49(2H, t, N+-CH2), 45.0 (2H, CH2-NH), 43.01 (2H, t, CH2-), 28.72 (1H, s, CH-CO-N-), 20.5 (2H, t, CH2-CH2-).

2.3.2. N-[Phenylenediammonium) Maleimidopropane Sulfonate Copolymer (II)

2.3.2.1. Synthesis Equimolar solutions of maleimide [0.9707g (0.01 mol) in 15.0 mL toluene], phenylene diamine [1.0814 mL (0.01 mol) in 15.0 mL toluene] were prepared separately. The solutions were mixed and photopolymerized by exposure to UV light using AIBN as initiator. Once polymerized, solution of 1,3-propane sultone [0.8774 mL (0.01 mol) in 5.0 mL toluene] was added to the reaction mixture and continued the reaction process under UV light. Dark brown crystals were obtained on completion of the reaction and were washed in copious amounts of toluene to remove any unreacted species and dried in oven. mp 180˚C. The product (yield 70%) was washed several times with water also and then dried in vacuo at room temperature. Analysis (%): C = 47.2, H = 6.0, N = 12.1. The indicated structure confirms the theoretical percentages (C = 47.5, H = 4.9, N = 12.8); where molecular weight of a monomer is 325 g/mol with the formula C13H15N3O5S including end group. The corresponding structure is shown in Scheme 2.

2.3.2.2. Characterization FTIR (400-4000 cm–1, KBr):

3312, 3155 (d, 2˚ N-H asym, sym) 3087 Aromatic str (n-CH), 2976 Aliphatic str (n-CH), 1712 (n-C=O), 1511 2˚ Ar amine, 1358, 1250 C-N str of n-NH, 1162 (C-N linkage-2˚ amine), 1069 (C-N str), 836 (n-CH bending), 678 (n-NH wagging), 673 (deformation n-CH).

H1 NMR (300MHz, DMSO, ppm):

d 11.30 (1H, s, CONH), 7.22 (1H, s, N-H+), 6.89 (4H, m, benzene protons), 4.62 (1H, d, -CO-CH-NH+), 3.49 (1H, s, CH-CO-), 1.85 (2H, t, -CH2-), 1.72 (2H, t, -CH2- NH+).

C13 NMR (75 MHz, DMSO, ppm):

d 178.7 (s, C=O), 148.12 (s, -C5H4), 128.0 (1H, d, benzene ring), 113.21 (1H, d, benzene ring), 52.6 (1H, d, -CH-CO-), 49.1 (2H, t, CH2-), 33.6 (1H, d-CH-CO-).

2.4. Modification of Silica Particles

The grafting of polymer chains on the silica particles were carried out in two steps: 1) introduction of amine groups onto the silica surface, 2) Michael addition of (a) maleimide to amino groups onto silica surface and (b) diamines on thus grafted maleimide groups on silica surface. Further cycles of reactions (a) and (b) were repeated several times to produce polymer grafted silica particles. 2.0 g of silica was refluxed with 5% toluene solution of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane for 8 h. After the reaction, amino-terminated silica particles were filtered on silica glass crucible G-4, washed several times with toluene and dried in oven at 120˚C for 5 h before use. Thus amino-terminated silica particles were subjected to Michael addition with maleimide group in step (a) and further with diamines and 1,3-propane sultone as described above under UV irradiation.

Scheme 2. Scheme of the polycondensation reaction for the polymer II.

2.5. Estimation of Amino Groups on Silica Surface

Amino groups introduced on the silica surface were determined by titration. To 0.10 g silica particles 20 ml of 0.01 N HCl was added and charged the mixture on magnetic stirrer at 65˚C for 2 h. The solution was filtered and filtrate was titrated with 0.01 N NaOH using phenolphthalein as an indicator.

2.6. Results and Discussion

Maleimide is a 1,2-disubstituted cyclic ethylene type monomer. Maleimide group is highly reactive toward primary amine groups to perform Michael addition reactions. This group is chosen due to the facile addition of amine across the e-deficient double bond; with maleimide, reaction occurs through the double bond of maleimide ring.

Although Michael addition is generally considered the addition of enolate nucleophiles to activated olefins, a wide range of functional groups possess sufficient nucleophilicity to perform as Michael donors [18]. Reactions involving non-enolate nucleophiles such as amines, thiols and phosphines are typically referred to as Michael –type additions. Michael acceptor possesses an electron withdrawing and resonance stabilizing activating group, which stabilizes the anionic intermediate [18]. Here, the –NH2 groups of phenylene diamine as nucleophile was condensed with maleimide The maleimide double bond is highly electrophilic due to the two adjacent electron withdrawing carbonyl groups. Further, the polymer chain was made to react with 1,3-propane sultone , a sulfoalkylating agent. In their reaction with nucleophiles, the nitrogen centres were quaternized resulting in zwitterionic centres along the polymeric chain (Scheme 1). The sulfopropyl groups are introduced by reaction of nucleophiles with commercially available 1,3-propane sultone [20]. The sulfopropyl group has been used extensively to improve the hydrophilicity of a variety of surfactants, dyes, nucleosides, proteins and polymers [21-26].

The infrared (IR) spectra of copolymers I and II are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The imidyl group (O=C-N-C= O) in maleimide has been assigned in literature an intense peak between 1700 and 1750 cm–1 (asymmetric stretching mode) and medium/weak peaks between 1740 and 1850 cm–1 (symmetric stretching mode) [27]. The respective peaks at 1714 and 1712 could be seen in Figures 1 and 2 in the IR spectra of I and II. Absorptions for sulfonate group appear at 1342, 1179 and 1039 cm–1 for I and at 1069 cm–1 in II. Other sulfonate peaks in the region around 1300 or 1150 are overlapped with C-N stretching absorptions. But in H1 NMR and C13 NMR spectra, respective peaks could be observed at 7.86 ppm and 7.22 ppm respectively. H1NMR and C13 NMR spectra are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

The small peak at 128 ppm in C13 NMR of polymer I is puzzling. Generally double bonds at C respond in this range. Geometry optimization and energy calculations were performed using DFT method. The DFT calculation is commonly applied as it has the advantage of highly accurate level of information, reliability and reasonable computational costs in comparison with other computational methods (e.g. ab initio) [28]. Therefore, DFT

Figure 1. Infrared spectra of pure (a) and grafted polymer on silica (b) for polymer I.

Figure 2. Infrared spectra of pure (a) and grafted polymer on silica (b) for polymer II.

Figure 3. H1 NMR (a) and C13 NMR (b) spectra of polymer I.

Figure 4. H1 NMR (a) and C13 NMR (b) spectra of polymer II.

method was selected to set up the calculations. The geometry optimizations were performed at B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) level of theory.

The optimized structure is shown in Figures 5 and 6. This structure (Figure 5) contains one partial double bond in between C7 and N6 in the maleimide ring. The electron density of carbonyl bond and the lone pair on N of maleimide are supposed to involve in this partial double bond proposed by DFT calculations and evinced by C13 NMR spectra. Mǖlliken atomic charges on the monomers and the copolymer units are provided in the supplementary material. For sake of brevity, only those atoms which have significance in our discussion are shown in the tables. In the monomer unit of copolymer I, C2 of maleimide is forming a new bond with primary amine N

Figure 5. Optimized structures of polymer I.

Figure 6. Optimized structures of polymer II.

of 2-aminoethyl piperazine, charge density of C2 has changed from (–0.120) to (+0.049) and that of N9 from (–0.698) to (+0.1537). The charge on N of maleimide ring changes from (–0.681) to (–0.0844). Similarly in the monomer unit of copolymer II, charge density of C2 has changed from (–0.120) to (+0.039) and that of N7 from (–0.836) to (–0.1487). The charge on N of maleimide ring changes from (–0.681) to (–0.0952). The computed dipole moment of I is 19.76 debye whereas that of II is 2.76 (Table 1). The copolymer I is highly polar. In the end, the partial double bond in maleimide ring proposed by the DFT computations might be assigned to the 128 ppm peak in C13 NMR spectra as shown in Figure 5.

Table 2 shows the solubility of polymers in various solvents. Polymers are insoluble in water but they are soluble in various solvents including dipolar aprotic solvents.

UV and Fluorescence spectra of polymers are shown

Table 1. Energies and dipole moments of monomer constituents and monomers.

Table 2. Solubility of polymers in various solvents.

in Figures 7. Absorption and fluorescence spectra of polymer I and II were recorded in the solution of ethanol:water (1:1) at concentration of 0.0024 g/L and 0.0012 g/L, respectively. Absorption spectra of polymers show absorption at 253 nm. Further, on exciting the polymers I and II at 256 nm and 250 nm, respectively, strong emission band was obtained for both at 357.5 nm. The fluorescence behaviour of the polymers can be attributed to chromophoric group maleimide.

The purpose of this study is to prepare a “responsive” polymer grafted surface for various purposes as required in different biomedical and /or industrial applications. To overcome the limitations of physically deposited polymers on the surface, the ‘grafted from’ procedure was adopted to implant newly synthesized polymer on silica surface. Amine groups introduced on the silica surface (Schemes 3 and 4) were made to react with maleimide under UV irradiation using AIBN as initiator. Thus attached maleimide groups were subsequently reacted with diamines and maleimide and so on in stepwise reactions as in the bulk polymerization discussed above. The copolymer chain was thus grown up from amine grafted silica particles. The IR spectra of copolymer and the silica grafted copolymer are shown in Figures 1 and 2. NMR spectra of grafted silica particles could not be recorded due to solubility problem.

A strong Si-O-Si absorption at 1110 cm–1 as well as

(a)(b)

Figure 7. Fluorescence spectra of polymer I (a) and II (b).

1715, 1680 absorptions other characteristic absorptions as observed in the spectra of bulk polymer appeared in the FTIR spectrum of polymer grafted silica (Figures 1 and 2), indicating that copolymer units were successfully incorporated onto the silica particles. The Michael addition reaction between the amine and maleimide groups formed succinimide groups, which should represent an absorption peak at about 1180 cm–1 which has been overlapped with the silica and sulfonate group absorptions. The content of amino group charged on the surface of silica as an initiator site as per the titration is 0.027 mmol/g whereas the grafting of polyelectrolyte on silica surface leaves behind 6.70 × 10–3 mmol/g of amino centres in case of copolymer I and 2.9 × 10–3  on grafting of copolymer II.

Scheme 3. Grafting of polymer I on silica particles.

The images of bulk polymer and polymer grafted silica particles from scanning electron microscopy technique are shown in Figures 8 and 9. Successful grafting of polymers could be noticed in the images. The grafted surface shows more coarseness than pure silica particle surface.

Further, the grafted surface thus developed has shown good prospects in our laboratory’s experiments as imprinted material to develop the sensitive and highly selective analytical technique to analyze small peptides with complementary chemistry.

3. Conclusion

In summary, we have presented a synthetic protocol for the design and build up of responsive polymer grafted surface based on Michael reaction, a versatile tool in polymer synthesis. At first, a pair of new sulfobetaine polymer is synthesized using Michael addition through

Scheme 4.Grafting of polymer II on silica particles.

(a)(b)

Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy of grafted polymer I on silica (a) at 137× and (b) at 25000× magnification.

Figure 9. Scanning electron microscopy of grafted polymer II on silica at 20000× magnification.

UV irradiation and characterized by means of elemental analysis, FT-IR, H1 NMR, C13 NMR spectral techniques. These polymers were grafted on silica surface to furnish polymer grafted silica particles. Silica particles were modified with APES to introduce amino groups on surface. Maleimide groups were attached to thus grafted amino ends on surface of silica particles and further Michael addition reactions were followed to graft copolymers on silica particles. Grafting steps were monitored and characterized using FTIR spectra. Several distinctive characteristics make the materials promising candidates for potential applications in material science. No catalyst is needed for the formation of the polymeric networks, so the materials are not contaminated with inorganic remains or byproduct as this is observed in other systems [29]. Zwitterionic nature provided by the sulfobetaine group endows them with biocompatibile nature for use in biomedical devices. Additionally, the fluorescence nature of these polyelectrolytes is interesting to explore their optoelectronic application.

REFERENCES

  1. M. Ozdemir, C. U. Yurteri and H.Sadikoglu, “Physical Polymer Surface Modification Methods and applications in Food Packaging Polymers,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1999, pp. 457-477. doi:10.1080/10408699991279240
  2. Z. Jia, S. Du and G. Tian, “Surface modification of Acrylic Fiber by grafting of casein,” Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A: Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2007, pp. 299-304. doi:10.1080/10601320601077351
  3. M. Suzuki, A. Kishida, H. Iwata and Y. Ikada, “Graft copolymerization of acrylamide onto a Polyethylene Surface Pretreated with Glow Discharge,” Macromolecules, Vol. 19, No. 7, 1986, pp.1804-1808. doi:10.1021/ma00161a005
  4. M. Onishi, K. Shimura, Y. Seita, S. Yamashita, A. Takahashi and T. Masuoka, “Preparation and properties of Plasma-Initiated Graft Copolymerized Membranes for Blood Plasma Separation,” International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part C. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1992, pp. 569-576. doi:10.1016/1359-0197(92)90114-U
  5. D. S. Wavhal and E. R. Fisher, “Hydrophilic modification of Polyethersulfone Membranes by Low Temperature Plasma-Induced Graft Polymerization,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 209, No. 1, 2002, pp. 255-259. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00352-6
  6. Y. Q. Song, J. Sheng, M. Wei and X. B. Yuan, “Surface modification of Polysulfone Membranes by Low-Temperature Plasma-Graft Poly(Ethylene Glycol) onto polysulfone membranes,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 78, No. 5, 2000, pp. 979-985. doi:10.1002/1097-4628(20001031)78:5<979::AID-APP60>3.0.CO;2-U
  7. J. Lei, X. Liao and D. Lin, “Studies on Surface Graft Copolymerization of Acrylic Acid onto LDPE film through Corona Discharge,” Chemical Journal on Internet, Vol. 2, 2000, Article ID: 021006pc.
  8. J. Lei, Q. Li, G. He and X. Lin, “Surface Graft Copolymerization of Acrylic Amide onto BOPP film through Corona Discharge,” Acta Chimica Sinica, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2000, pp. 598-600.
  9. J. Lei, M. Shi and J. Zhang, “Surface Graft Copolymerization of Hydrogen Silicon Fluid onto fabric through corona discharge and Water Repellency of Grafted Fabric,” European Polymer Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1277-1281. doi:10.1016/S0014-3057(99)00169-X
  10. S. Mok, D. J. Worsfold, A. Founda and T. Matsuura, “Surface modification of Poly(Ether Sulfone) HollowFiber Membranes by γ-Ray Irradiation,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1994, pp. 193-199. doi:10.1002/app.1994.070510120
  11. A. F. Filho and A. S. Gomes, “Copolymerization of styrene onto Polyethersulfone Films Induced by Gamma Ray Irradiation,” Polymer Bulletin, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2006, pp. 415-421. doi:10.1007/s00289-006-0574-7
  12. E. Bucio, E. Arenas and G. Burillo, “Radiation Grafting of N-isopropylacrylamide onto Polypropylene films by Preirradiation Method,” Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, Vol. 447, No. 1, 2006, pp. 521-531. doi:10.1080/15421400500387593
  13. J. Deng, L. Wang, L. Liu and W. Yang, “Developments and New Applications of UV-Induced Surface Graft Polymerizations,” Progress in Polymer Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2009, pp. 156-194. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.06.002
  14. G. Oster and O. Shibata, “Graft copolymer of polyacrylamide and Natural Rubber Produced by means of ultraviolet light,” Journal of Polymer Science, Vol. 26, No. 113, 1957, pp. 233-234. doi:10.1002/pol.1957.1202611311
  15. B. Kasemo and J. Gold, “Graft copolymer of polyacrylamide and Natural Rubber Produced by means of ultraviolet light,” Advances in Dental Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1999, pp. 8-20. doi:10.1177/08959374990130011901
  16. F. H. Jones, “Teeth and Bones: Applications of Surface Science to Dental Materials and Related Biomaterials,” Surface Science Reports, Vol. 42, No. 3-6, 2001, pp. 75-205. doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X
  17. D. Klee and H. Hocker, “Advances in Polymer Science: Biomedical Application/Polymer Blends,” Biomedical Applications Polymer Blends, Vol. 149, 1999, pp. 1-55. doi:10.1007/3-540-48838-3_1
  18. B. D. Mather, K. Viswanathan, K. M. Miller and T. E. Long, “Michael Addition Reactions in Macromolecular Design for Emerging Technologies,” Progress in Polymer Science, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2006, pp. 487-531. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.03.001
  19. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, et al., “Gaussian 03, Revision D.01,” Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.
  20. W. Roberts and W. L. D. Liams, “Sultone chemistry,” Tetrahedron, Vol. 43, No. 6, 1987, pp. 1027-1062. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90041-9
  21. K. D. Schmitt, “Surfactant-Mediated Phase Transfer as an Alternative to Propanesultone Alkylation. Formation of a New Class of Zwitterionic Surfactants,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, Vol. 60, No. 17, 1995, pp. 5474-5479. doi:10.1021/jo00122a028
  22. O. R. Gautun, P. H. J. Carlsen, T. Maldal, O. Vikane and E. Gilje, “Selective Synthesis of Aliphatic Ethylene Glycol Sulfonate Surfactants,” Acta Chemica Scandinavica, Vol. 50, 1996, pp. 170-177. doi:10.3891/acta.chem.scand.50-0170
  23. J. H. Flanagan, S. H. Khan, S. Menchen, S. A. Soper and R. P. Hammer, “Functionalized Tricarbocyanine Dyes as Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes for Biomolecules,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1997, pp. 751-756. doi:10.1021/bc970113g
  24. G. Carrea, G. Ottolina, S. Riva, B. Danieli, G. Lesma and G. Palmisano, “Alkylation of Adenine, Adenosine, and NAD+ with 1,3-Propanesultone. Synthesis of N6-(3-sulfonatopropyl)-NAD+, a new NAD+ derivative with Substantial Coenzyme Activity,” Helvetica Chimica Acta, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1988, pp. 762-772. doi:10.1002/hlca.19880710411
  25. U. T. Ruegg and J. Rudinger, “Reaction of Cysteine Thiol Groups with 1,3-Propane Sultone: S-3-Sulphopropyl as a Modifying Group for Protein Chemistry,” International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1974, pp. 447-456. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1974.tb02405.x
  26. Y. Ikenoue, Y. Saida, M. Kira, H. Tomozawa, H. Yahima and M. Kobayashi, “A Facile Preparation of a Self-Doped Conducting Polymer,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, Vol. 23, 1990, pp. 1694-1695. doi:10.1039/c39900001694
  27. S-J. Xiao, S.Brunner and M.Wieland, “Reactions of Surface Amines with Heterobifunctional Cross-Linkers Bearing both Succinimidyl Ester and maleimide for Grafting Biomolecules,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 108, No. 42, 2004, pp. 16508-16517. doi:10.1021/jp047726s
  28. S. Riahi, F. Edris-Tabrizi, M. Javanbakht, M. R. Ganjali and P. Norouzi, “A Computational Approach to studying Monomer Selectivity towards the template in an Imprinted Polymer,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2004, pp. 829-836. doi:10.1007/s00894-008-0437-2
  29. C. Wood, B. Tan, A. Trewin, H. Niu, D. Bradshaw, M. J. Rosseinsky, Y. Z. Khimyak, N. L. Campbell, R. Kirk, E. Stockel and A. I. Cooper, “Hydrogen Storage in Microporous Hypercrosslinked Organic Polymer Networks,” Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 19, No. 8, 2007, pp. 2034- 2048. doi:10.1021/cm070356a

NOTES

*Corresponding author.