Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.05 No.14(2014), Article ID:49019,8 pages
10.4236/jmp.2014.514127
Bohr’s Spectrum of Quantum States in the Atomic Hydrogen Deduced from the Uncertainty Principle for Energy and Time
Stanisław Olszewski
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Email: olsz@ichf.edu.pl
Copyright © 2014 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 12 June 2014; revised 8 July 2014; accepted 1 August 2014
ABSTRACT
A modified uncertainty principle coupling the intervals of energy and time can lead to the shortest distance attained in course of the excitation process, as well as the shortest possible time interval for that process. These lower bounds are much similar to the interval limits deduced on both the experimental and theoretical footing in the era when the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been developed. In effect of the bounds existence, a maximal nuclear charge Ze acceptable for the Bohr atomic ion could be calculated. In the next step the velocity of electron transitions between the Bohr orbits is found to be close to the speed of light. This result provides us with the energy spectrum of transitions similar to that obtained in the Bohr’s model. A momentary force acting on the electrons in course of their transitions is estimated to be by many orders larger than a steady electrostatic force existent between the atomic electron and the nucleus.
Keywords:
Uncertainty Principle for Energy and Time, Bohr’s Spectrum of Quantum levels in the Hydrogen Atom

1. Introduction
The Bohr model of the hydrogen atom [1] assumed circular trajectories for electrons circulating about the atomic nucleus and the motion along these trajectories has been quantized. In effect definite radii of the orbits
(1)
and electron velocities on these orbits
(2)
could be calculated. From the balance of the electron energy
(3)
in which
and
are substituted from (1) and (2), a well-known quantum formula
(4)
could be obtained. Later it became possible to derive the same
formula on the basis of a quantum- mechanical approach [2] .
The classical Bohr model stimulated several questions concerning its validity, the main of which was perhaps how the electron―in course of its transition to another orbit―can choose that orbit and become limited in its further motion to it [3] [4] . In other words the problem was concerning not so much separate
, but their differences
(5)
for some
, and the way how (5) can define the atomic spectrum.
The present paper tends to meet this question in case when an approach to the energy spectrum is done on the basis of the uncertainty principle, the essence of which are the energy differences
applied together with the time intervals
(6)
In fact the principle expressed in the form given by Heisenberg [5]
(7)
where
is a difference of energy met in the quantum process, and has been next objected on many occasions [6] - [8] . The effect of that numerous textbooks on physics or quantum mechanics do not even mention the validity; see e.g. [9] . Nevertheless a modification of (7) into a new formula
(8)
could be performed [10] - [12] and we show below that this transformation makes the uncertainty principle suitable in obtainig the atomic spectrum; the Formula (7) is fully ineffective at that point.
But before the spectrum is demonstrated, our aim is to point out that (8) can give also the lower bounds of the space intervals, say that along the Cartesian coordinate
which is

This result can give a similar lower bound of the time intervals (6) met in the quantum processes.
2. Lower Bounds of the Position and Time Intervals Derived from the Uncertainty Principle for Energy and Time
Heisenberg [5] has coupled the observables which are the intervals of the position coordinate and that of momentum in the uncertainty relations similar to that given in (7) for the energy and time. Mathematically this is expressed by the formula

on condition that only the 


The Relations (10) and (7) imply no limits for





in which the particle velocity 




towards its limit of the light velocity



and

entering the (10) and (7) should tend to zero.
But this property has been objected already very soon after the the birth of the Heisenberg uncertainty relations [5] . The objections denying the arbitrary small 



and a minimal 

where 
In order to derive (16) from (8) let us assume that 



where 
On the other hand we have

which is the effect of one of the Hamilton equations:

A transformation of (19) gives

This formula, substituted together with (18) into (8), gives:

or

Therefore we obtain a condition for the smallest 

This expression differs from (16) solely by a factor of





The result in (23) differs from that in (17) solely by the factor of
It can be noted that 

required to transform the kinetic energy of a particle motion into the energy of the electromagnetic radiation [18] .
3. Discussion
The lower bounds of 




and from (8) and (23):

If instead of (8) the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (7) together with (23) is applied, the result for the upper bound of 

We see that the Formulae (25)-(27) for the upper bounds of the intervals of momentum and energy approach the relations which are well known from the classical relativistic mechanics. In the present case, however, they are an effect of the quantum-mechanical uncertainty formulae.
If the limiting values 

tainty Relation (8)―in order to be satisfied--should attain its certitude in the form

for in this case holds the relation

If the energy change 

there should exist the formula

defining a maximal frequency
For 


Roughly a similar result for 
Moreover, for 




If the orbital radii of a hydrogen-like atom having the nucleus of charge 


giving the smallest radius

According to the result obtained in (22) the smallest possible radius (32) should satisfy the relation

This gives a limiting condition for the atomic number

A similar condition can be obtained by considering the shortest time period 


By applying next the Formula (33a) in (34) we obtain the relation

from which, by multiplying the both sides of the last equation in (35) by 

The sense of (35a) is that in order to obtain from (35a) the same limiting 





4. The Uncertainty Relation (8) Referred to the Energy Spectrum of the Hydrogen Atom
Till the present point the electron motion on the orbits has been mainly taken into account. But in calculating the electron transitions between orbits the electron velocity normal to the orbital trajectories has to be considered. Let the electron which is on a circular orbit labelled by


on condition we assume that

so the term 




The property that the time interval 

In course of the transition process the electron energy on the orbit is changed by an absolute amount equal to [see (5)]:

If we put

we obtain from (39) and (40) the formula

For large 


on the orbit 


where the factor of 137 is coming from the constant expression (33a).
A characteristic point is that a substitution of 


For 


The largest velocity (45) coming from 


If an approximate time interval

is substituted in place of 

from which

This expression becomes equal to that obtained from the Bohr theory in (40) on condition

or

are satisfied.
In effect a proper choice of 


Certainly, the 

5. The Momentary Force Acting on an Electron in Case of Its Transition between the Orbits
A stationary force acting on the electron of the hydrogen atom is a well-known electrostatic force of the electron attraction by the nucleus. This force is assumed by Bohr to be compensated by the centrifugal force of the electron orbital motion, so on an orbit having the index 

Evidently this force is of a stationary character. Our aim is to approach a momentary force acting in course of the electron transition between the orbits.
Since the electron velocity of transition is close to 





where the transition time


When the energy relations instead of the forces are taken into account, the force given in (53) is multiplied by the distance 

on condition the velocity property presented in (38) is unchanged. In this case the energy 

6. Summary
In the first step we have demonstrated on the basis of a modified uncertainty relation between the intervals of energy and time that both an interval of the particle position and that of time can attain some minimal values different than zero. These interval limits differ solely by a factor of 



A separate attention has been attached to the velocity calculation for the electron transitions between the orbits. First, with the aid of the uncertainty principle, it has been demonstrated that―for the atomic levels having index 


The ratio of the stationary electrostatic force acting on the atomic electron to a momentary force active only in course of the electron transition between the orbits has been estimated in (54).
Cite this paper
StanisławOlszewski, (2014) Bohr’s Spectrum of Quantum States in the Atomic Hydrogen Deduced from the Uncertainty Principle for Energy and Time. Journal of Modern Physics,05,1264-1271. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.514127
References
- 1. Bohr, N. (1913) Philosophical Magazine, 26, 1. de Boer, J., Dal, E. and Ulfbeck, O. (1986) The Lesson on Quantum Theory—Niels Bohr Centenary Symposium. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
- 2. Schrodinger, E. (1926) Annalen der Physik, 79, 361-376.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.19263840404 - 3. Bohr, N. (1961) Proceedings of the Physical Society, 78, 1083.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/78/6/301 - 4. Tarasov, L.V. (1978) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Vyzszaja Szkola Moscow. (in Russian)
- 5. Heisenberg, W. (1927) Zeitschrift fur Physik, 43, 172-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280 - 6. Schommers, W. (1989) Space-Time and Quantum Phenomena. In: Schommers, W., Ed., Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality, Springer, Berlin.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95570-9_5 - 7. Allcock, G.R. (1969) Annals of Physics, 53, 253-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(69)90251-6 - 8. Bunge, M. (1970) Canadian Journal of Physics, 48, 1410-1411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p70-172 - 9. Isaacs, A. (1990) Concise Dictionary of Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 10. Olszewski, S. (2011) Journal of Modern Physics, 2, 1305-1309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2011.211161 - 11. Olszewski, S. (2012) Journal of Modern Physics, 3, 217-220.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2012.33030 - 12. Olszewski, S. (2012) Quantum Matter, 1, 127-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/qm.2012.1010 - 13. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1969) Mechanics. Electrodynamics. Nauka, Moscow. (in Russian)
- 14. Ruark, A.E. (1928) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 14, 322.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.14.4.322 - 15. Flint, H.E. (1928) Proceedings of the Royal Society A, London, 117, 630.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0025 - 16. Flint, H.E. and Richardson, O.W. (1928) Proceedings of the Royal Society A, London, 117, 637.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0026 - 17. Jammer, M. (1966) The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- 18. Arbab, A.I. and Yassein, F.A. (2012) Journal of Modern Physics, 3, 163-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2012.32022 - 19. Olszewski, S. (2013) Quantum Matter, 2, 408-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/qm.2013.1072 - 20. Sommerfeld, A. (1931) Atombau und Spektrallinien. Vol. 1, 5th Edition, Vieweg, Braunschweig.
- 21. Slater, J.C. (1960) Quantum Theory of the Atomic Structure. Vol. 1, McGraw-Hill, New York.


