Applied Mathematics
Vol.5 No.9(2014), Article ID:46147,6 pages
DOI:10.4236/am.2014.59130
F-Multiautomata on Join Spaces Induced by Differential Operators
Rajab Ali Borzooei1, Hamid Reza Varasteh2, Abbas Hasankhani3
1Department of Mathematics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran
Email: borzooei@sbu.ac.ir, varastehhamid@gmail.com, abhasan@mail.uk.ac.ir
Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Received 15 February 2014; revised 22 March 2014; accepted 1 April 2014
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we introduce the notion of fuzzy multiautomata and we investigate the hyperstructures induced by the linear second-order differential operators which can be used for construction of fuzzy multiautomata serving as a theoretical background for modeling of processes.
Keywords:Fuzzy Systems, Differential Operators, Hyperalgebraic Structures, Multiautomata
1. Introduction
Hyperstructure theory was born in 1934 when Marty defined hypergroups as a generalization of groups. This theory has been studied in the following decades and nowadays by many mathematicians. The hypergroup theory both extends some well-known group results and introduces new topics, thus leading to a wide variety of applications, as well as to a broadening of the investigation fields. There are applications of algebraic hyperstructures to the following subjects: geometry, hypergraphs, binary relations, lattices, fuzzy sets and rough sets, automata, cryptography, combinatorics, codes, artificial intelligence, and probabilistic. A comprehensive review of the theory of hyperstructures appears in [1] -[3] .
Further, since the beginning of the first decade of this century relationships between ordinary linear differential operators and the hypergroup theory have been studied [4] -[8] .
Zadeh [9] introduced the theory of fuzzy sets and, soon after, Wee [10] introduced
the concept of fuzzy automata. Automata have a long history both in theory and application
and are the prime examples of general computational systems over discrete spaces.
Fuzzy automata not only provide a systematic approach for handling uncertainty in
such systems, but also can be used in continuous spaces [11] . In this paper, we
introduce F-multiautomaton, without output function, where the transition function
or next state function satisfies so called Fuzzy Generalized Mixed Condition (FGMC).These
-multiautomata are systems that can be used for the
transmission of information of certain type. Then we construct
-multiautomata of commutative hypergroups and join spaces
created from second order linear differential operators.
2. Preliminaries
Let J be an open interval of real numbers, and
be the group of all continuous functions from J to interval
. In what follows we denote
that named differential operators of second order. And define
. Recall some basic notions of the hypergroup
theory. A hypergroupoid is a pair
where
and
is a binary hyperoperation on H. (Here
denotes the system of all nonempty subsets of (H)). If
holds for all
then
is called a semihypergroup. If moreover, the reproduction axiom (
, for any element
) is satisfied, then the pair
is called a hypergroup. Join spaces are playing an important role in theories of
various mathematical structures and their applications. The concept of a join space
has been introduced by Prenowitz [12] and used by him and afterwards together with
James Jantoisciak to reconstruct several branches of geometry. In order to define
a join space, we need the following notation: If
are elements of a hypergroupoid
then we denote
and
we intend the set
.
Definition 2.1 [12] [13] A commutative hypergroup
is called a join space (or commutative transposition hypergroup) if the following
condition holds for all elements
of
:
By a quasi-ordered (semi)group we mean a triple
where
is a (semi) group and binary relation
is a quasi ordering (i.e. is reflexive and transitive) on the set G such that, for
any triple
with the property
also
and
hold.
The following lemma is called Ends-Lemma that is proved on [14] [15] .
Lemma 2.2 Let
be a quasi-ordered semigroup. Define a hyperoperation
For all pairs of elements. Then
is a semihypergroup which is commutative if the semigroup
is commutative. If moreover,
is a group, then
is a transposition hypergroup. Therefore, if
is a commutative group, then
is a join space.
Proposition 2.3 For any pair of differential operators
define a binary operation as below:
and define a quasi-ordered relation as following:
Then
is a commutative ordered group with the unit element
□
Now we apply the simple construction of a hypergroup from Lemma 2.2 into this considered concrete case of differential operators:
For arbitrary pair of operators
we put:
Then we obtain the following Corollary from Lemma 2. 2 immediately:
Corollary 2.4 For each, if
Then
is a commutative hypergroup and a join space.
Definition 2.5 [16] Let
be a non-empty set,
be a (semi) hypergroup and
be a mapping such that, for all
, and
:
(2.1)
Then
is called a discrete transformation (semi)hypergroup or an action of the (semi)hypergroup
H on the set X. The mapping
is usually said to be simply an action.
Remark 2.6 The condition (2.1) used above is called Generalized Mixed Associativity Condition, shortly GMAC.
Definition 2.7 [6] [7] (Quasi)multiautomaton without output is a triad, where
is a (semi)hypergroup, S is a non-empty set, and
is a transition map satisfying GMAC condition. The set S is called the state set
of the (quasi)multiautomaton M, the structure
is called a input (semi)- hypergroup of the (quasi)multiautomaton M and
is called a transition function. Elements of the set S are called states and the
elements of the set H are called input symbols.
3. (-Multi Automata
Definition 3.1 A fuzzy transformation (semi)hypergroup (or a fuzzy action) of (semi)hypergroup
H on S is a triple
where
is a non-empty set,
is a (semi)hypergroup, and
is a fuzzy subset of
such that, for all
and
:
(3.2)
Remark 3.2 The condition (3.2) used above is called Fuzzy Generalized Mixed Condition, shortly FGMC.
Definition 3.3
-(quasi) multiautomaton without outputs is a triad
, where
is a (semi)hyper-group,
is a non-empty set and
is a fuzzy transition map satisfying FGMC condition.
Set S is called the state set and the hyperstructure
is called the input (semi)hypergroup of the
- (quasi)multiautomaton
and
is called fuzzy transition function. Elements of the set
are called states and the elements of the set
are called input symbols.
Definition 3.4
-(quasi)multiautomaton
is said to be abelian (or commutative) if
Example 3.5 Suppose that
Let hyperoperation
on H and fuzzy transition function
are defined as follows:
* |
a |
B |
a |
{a} |
{a,b} |
b |
{a,b} |
{b} |
And for all other ordered triples
we define
. Then
is a commutative
- multiautomaton (Figure 1).
4. (-Multi Automata on Join Spaces Induced by Differential Operators
Proposition 4.1: Let
where, for all
Figure 1. The
-multiautomaton of Example 3.5.
And define:
Then
is a commutative
-multiautomaton.
Proof: By Lemma 2.2 the hypergroupoid
is a join space. Now, we prove this structure is satisfying FGMC property. Let
𝒾
and
, for all
and
.
Then
𝒾
Clearly 𝒾
(since we can take
or
for each
). Then FGMC property holds. Hence
is a
-multiautomaton. In addition, since
, for all
then
is commutative. □
Proposition 4.2: Let
where hyperoperation
was defined in proposition 4.1.
And define:
Then
is a commutative
-multiautomaton.
Proof: By Lemma 2.2 the hypergroupoid
is a join space. Now, we prove this structure is satisfying FGMC property. Let
𝒿
and
for all,
and
.
Then
𝒿
Since
for all
then 𝒿
. Hence FGMC property holds. Therefore
is a
-multiautomaton. In addition, It is clear that
is commutative.
Proposition 4.3: Let
where, for all
:
And define:
Then
is a commutative
-multiautomaton.
Proof: According to Corollary 2.4
is a join space. Now we check the FGMC property for this structure. Let
And
, for all
and
.
Then
Since
for all
then
. Hence
is a
-multiautomaton. It is clear that
is commutative.
□
Proposition 4.4: Let, where hyperoperation * was defined
in proposition 3.4.
And define:
Then
is a commutative
-multiautomaton.
Proof: According to Corollary 2.4
is a join space. Now, we prove this structure is satisfying FGMC property. Let
𝓂
for all
and
.
Then
𝓂
Since
and
, for all
then 𝓂
. Hence
is a
multiautomaton. It is clear that
is commutative.
5. Conclusion
In this research, we introduced
-multistructures which can be used for construction
of
-multiautomata serving as a theoretical background for
modeling of processes. Then we obtain some
-multiautomata of linear second-order differential operators.
In future work, we can introduce
-multiautomaton with output and concrete interpretations
of these structures can be studied.
References
- Corsini, P. and Leoreanu, V. (2003) Applications of Hyperstructure Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3714-1
- Corsini, P. (1993) Prolegomena of Hypergroup Theory. Aviani Editore, Tricesimo.
- Davvaz, B. and Leoreanu, V. (2008) Hyperring Theory and Applications. International Academic Press, USA.
- Chvalina, J. and Rakova, P. (2008) Join Spaces of Smooth Functions and Their Actions on Transposition Hypergroups of Second Order Linear Differential Operators. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 55-63.
- Chvalina, J. and Hoskova, S. (2007) Action of Hypergroups of the First Order Partial Differential Operators. 6th International Conference Aplimat, Department of Mathematics, FME Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, 177- 184.
- Chvalina, J. (2008) Infinite Multiautomata with Phase Hypergroups of Various Operators. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Algebraic Hyperstructures and Applications, University of Defence, Brno, 57-69.
- Chvalina, J. and Chvalina, L. (2009) Action of Join Spaces of Continuous Functions on the Underlying Hypergroups of 2-Dimentional Linear Spaces of Functions. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2, 24-34.
- Hoskov’a, S. and Chvalina, J. (2008) Multiautomata Formed by First Order Partial Differential Operators. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1, 423-430.
- Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Inform and Control, 8, 338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
- Wee, W.G. (1967) On Generalization of Adaptive Algorithm and Application of the Fuzzy Sets Concept to Pattern Classification. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
- Mordeson, J. and Malik, D. (2002) Fuzzy Automata and Languages: Theory and Applications. ACRC Press Company, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420035643
- Prenowitz, W. (1943) Projective Geometries as Multigroups. The American Journal of Mathematics, 65, 235-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2371812
- Prenowitz, W. and Jantosciak, W. (1972) Geometries and Join Spaces. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 257, 100-128.
- Chvalina, J. (1995) Functional Graphs, Quasi Ordered Sets and Commutative Hypergroups. Masaryk University, Brno.
- Novák, M. (2013) Some Basic Properties of EL-Hyperstructures. European Journal of Combinatorics, 34, 446-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2012.09.005
- Hoskova, S. and Chvalina, J. (2008) Discrete Transformation Hypergroups and Transformation Hypergroups with Phase Tolerance Space. Discrete Mathematics, 308, 4133-4143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2007.08.005