Creative Education
Vol.07 No.03(2016), Article ID:64596,8 pages

Factors That Influence Efficiency of Writing Essays in Arabic

Salma Endut1, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff2, Mohd Yusri Kamarudin2

1Institute of Teacher Education, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia

2Faculty of Education, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 2 February 2016; accepted 13 March 2016; published 16 March 2016


Writing skill is a conspicuous language-related skill but many regard it as the most difficult skill to be practiced due to the involvement of complex and complicated thought processes. The success or failure of a student to write is often associated with a number of factors. This study has been conducted to evaluate the level of writing skill among students of Islamic Secondary Schools, to measure the difference of writing skills between SMKA and SMAN, to identify the most dominant factor that determine the mastery of writing, and to evaluate such factors’ interaction with student achievement. 184 form-three students were chosen to participate for the purpose of this study. This study used writing efficiency level test and Attitude Questionnaire instruments that contained 25 perception items to represent the five factors studied. Application of mean scale and t-test showed that there was no significant difference in the efficiency of writing between students from both types of school. Other than that, there was no link found between the studied factors except for the teacher factor. This study found that teacher factor is the most dominant one in determining the level of students’ efficiency in writing Arabic.


Writing Essay, Learning Arabic, Learning Skills

1. Introduction

The Malaysian Ministry of Education (2008) has identified that essay-writing is the major obstacle for students to acquiring decent marks in examination. According to Jalaluddin, Yunus, & Yamat (2011) , this is due to the 60 percent of marks being allocated in Lower Secondary Assessment (PMR) for writing while 85 percent are allocated for Malaysian Certificate of Education (SPM). PMR Performance Report, Examination Board, Ministry of Education Malaysia (2002) and SPM Answer Quality Evaluation Report for Higher Arabic Language (Examination Board, 2007) notes that the writing level of forms three and form five students in this subject are at an average level. Studies by Jaafar (2011) and Ahmad (2003) claim that students’ weak efficiency in writing in Arabic results from not completely learning the method to construct sentences. In addition, studies find that writing essays is not an easy task and cannot be merely mastered without any formal practices due to being a complex cognitive activity that requires five attention levels―thematic, paragraph, sentence, grammar, and lexical (Lavelle, Smith, & O’Ryan, 2002) . Hidi & Boscolo (2008) note that there is a difference between a writer and a reader, as writers compose texts within a limited environment and time, and not just simply use them.

Due to such complications, it is no wonder that students face many writing skills-related problems and are often disappointed (Scott & Vitale, 2003) . They identify that these problems stem from issues ranging from more basic mechanical issues such as spelling, idea, and punctuations to higher cognitive and metacognitive problems. Due to this alarming matter, it is therefore important for the affecting factors to be studied and to be learned by language teachers and language curriculum planners. There are various factors that affect students’ efficiency in reading and writing as suggested by many literatures. Yusof (1999) investigates factors that affect efficiency of writing in Malay Language among form four students. They find that environment, reading frequency, support activities, students’ intelligence, and socio-economy status are among the key factors. Additionally, Yusoff & Ghani (1999) find that students’ knowledge background plays the most important role in affecting students’ skill efficiency in reading Arabic among some other factors.

With reference to these findings, teacher, psychology, intellect, and reading materials are the important factors that need to be studied in the present study. Boud (2001) emphasizes the importance of a teacher as a facilitator in various student-centered writing activities, while Witte, Daly, Faigley, & Koch (1983) claim that students themselves want to be taught various kinds of essays effectively. It is claimed that the best writing teacher is one who is good, superior, and has high intellectual level. Previous researchers found that teachers’ behaviors could cause students to have intrinsic motivation (Baba, 2007; Senin, 1997) . Additionally, motivation factor is also regarded as the key factor to success for language learning (Dörnyei, 1990; Gardner, 1985) . It serves as a source of energy and momentum factor to students in enabling them to study more actively and effectively. Studies by Teh (2009), and Crow & Crow (1983) find a positive relationship between students’ interest and motivation with their achievements. Besides that, Schonell (1981) argues that environmental factors such as living residential area and family socioeconomic status affect children’s second language mastery. Furthermore, Khalid (1993) claimed that Arabic mastery is weak in Malaysia due to the lack of language environment that could encourage it, and Zawawi (2001) found that there is indeed, a positive relationship between environment and Arabic speaking skill. On the other hand, Gardner (1985) claimed that individuals, in general, are intelligent and their type of intelligence differentiates them to one another that affect their achievements. Indeed, a study from Zin (2007) and Zin (2006) found that intellectual factor has strong relationship between verbal-linguistic and interpersonal domain. Studies from Mohamad (2009) and Haron (1982) found that the frequency of reading additional materials has significant relationship with students’ language achievement and this claim is supported by Jalil (1993) who said that lacking in reading materials affect students’ writing ability.

This study was carried out to identify the factors that influence the writing of writing in Arabic among Islamic Secondary School students in Terengganu.

The objectives are as follows:

1) To measure the level of efficiency of writing in Arabic among Islamic Secondary School students and the difference in the levels of students in National Islamic Secondary School (Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama, SMKA) and Sekolah Menengah Agama Negeri;

2) To identify the most dominant factor in determining efficiency of writing among students;

3) To identify the relationship between intellect, psychology, environment, teachers, and reading materials factors in Arabic essay writing.

2. Methodology

This study used a questionnaire and writing efficiency assessment to gather data. The questionnaire contains two parts. Part A contains respondent backgrounds, including as gender, age, address, and type of school. Part B consists of 25 perception items that represent the five factors studied. Items in the questionnaire are modified version of the Attitude Questionnaire (Skurnik & Jeffs, 1970) . The writing efficiency assessment contains four questions employed in previous PMR questions and samples were instructed to choose only one.

Respondents were 184 form three students from two Islamic Secondary Schools in Terengganu. Respondents were chosen from groups with good, average, and weak achievement. For the purpose of this study, respondents were gathered in a hall and were asked to fill in the questionnaires. They were then given language efficiency assessment question sets, answer sheets, and assessment instruction. 45 minutes were allocated for them to answer one of the four questions given with word count not exceeding than a hundred.

Data was then analyzed by using percentage min and t-test. According to Malaysian Board of Examination, marks are categorized as follows ? 60 - 100 marks (good), 40 - 59 (average), and 0 - 39 (weak). T-test was used to analyze writing efficiency level between students in SMKA and SMAN. Correlation coefficient, r, was used to evaluate the relationships between the factors studied. Descriptive test was used to get respondents’ writing efficiency level. This study also used a scale from Baba (1997) that is denoted as follows―mean = 1.00 to mean = 2.00 (very low), mean = 2.01 to mean = 3.00 (low), mean = 3.01 to mean = 4.00 (average), and mean = 4.01 to mean = 5.00 (high). As for the correlation coefficient, this study used relationship scale from Konting (2005) as follows―r = 0.01 to r = 0.09 (very low), r = 0.10 to r = 0.29 (low), r = 0.30 to r = 0.49 (average), r = 0.50 to r = 0.69 (high), and r = 0.70 to r = 1.00 (very high).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Respondents

A total of 184 students from two schools were selected as respondents. Respondents consisted of boys and girls, aged 14 and 15 years. 59.2 percent lived in urban areas. However, the number of respondents in both schools is the same. Details of the demographic respondents are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Writing Efficiency Achievement Level

The result from writing efficiency assessment with 184 form three respondents yielded good writing level. Table 2 shows that SMKA and SMAN students’ achievement are at mean = 64.22 which is at “good” level of between 60 to 100.

3.3. Difference in Writing Efficiency between Smka and Sman

T-test result (Table 3) shows that there was no significant difference in the scores of writing efficiency for SMKA (M = 65.77, SD = 19.81) and SMAN (M = 62.55, SD = 24.81), p > 0.05.

3.4. The Most Dominant Factor Affecting Writing Efficiency

Results from analysis of factors that affect secondary students writing efficiency are shown in Table 4. Teachers factor recorded the highest (mean = 4.15) as compared to psychology (mean = 3.73), followed by environment (mean = 3.44), intellect (mean = 3.31) and reading materials (mean = 3.06). Teachers factor is at high level according to the scale of 4.01 to 5.00. This shows that teachers factor is the most dominant factor affecting Islamic

Table 1. Demographic respondents.

Table 2. Writing efficiency level mean in Islamic Secondary School.

Table 3. T-test result of writing efficiency level between school categories.

Significant at 0.05 level.

Table 4. Efficiency factors mean.

Secondary School students’ Arabic writing efficiency level.

3.5. Relationship between Factors and Students’ Achievements

Table 5 shows the result of the Pearson correlation test between the studied factors with students’ achievements in Arabic writing efficiency. It shows that there is a significant result between teachers’ factor with students’ achievements (p < 0.01). In contrast, there are no significant relationships between other factors with students’ achievements. This draws to the conclusion that the teacher factor has the most significant relationship as compared to the other ones.

4. Discussion and Suggestion

The result of this study shows that students’ efficiency to write in Arabic is of good level. There is no difference of writing efficiency level between students of both schools. There is no significant relationship between the factors to students’ Arabic writing achievements except for teachers’ factor.

This study also found that Arabic writing efficiency level among Islamic Secondary School in Terengganu is at good level even though performance level report of PMR (2002) and SPM (2007) recorded average levels nationwide. Our finding is that only the teacher factor has significant relationship with students’ achievements, which is congruent to findings from previous literatures (Baba, 2007; Boud, 2001; Senin, 1997) . However, our finding is inconsistent to the one by Yusoff & Ghani (1999) who found that students’ knowledge background serves as the most dominant factor in Arabic comprehension.

Therefore, we propose the implications of this study to the teaching and learning process of writing in Arabic. Our finding is parallel with previous studies in that the teacher factor plays a vital role in affecting students’ writing level. Students are depended mostly on teachers and their roles are utterly important in improving students’ performance as indicated in White (1983). Johari (1994) emphasized that teachers’ methodology in conveying lessons towards writing processes need to be considered by language educator. Generally, there are two types of writing approach―product (traditional) and process (Long, 2010) . Product approach took the stance that regards writing process as simple for only focusing on the writing (Jamaluddin et al. 1993). In contrast, approach process is rather delicate and can only be mastered via practices and formal learning (Long & Jauyah, 1995) . It focuses on the writing activities that are considered able to encourage students into being an effective writer. Therefore, process-oriented teaching from writing teachers is anticipated to produce students who are able to write impeccable yet understandable Arabic essays as set forth in 2009 Secondary Schools’ Arab

Table 5. Correlation between factors affecting writing efficiency with students’ achievements.

language syllabus.

Finally, this study had limitations. It was conducted among Islamic Secondary School students at SMKA and SMAN, which limits its generalizability. Findings suggest that teaching styles in Arabic essay writing need to be changed among Arabic teachers. This is one of the challenges that Arabic teachers will have to confront and acknowledge, especially to prepare students to write better.

5. Conclusion

This study has been a success in determining the most important factor that effects Islamic Secondary School students’ writing efficiency. Our findings are important, especially for teachers to practice positive attitudes and employ a process approach method in conveying writing lessons. This is parallel to the targets, objectives, and needs of Arabic syllabus in the Malaysian Secondary School Integrated Curriculum that calls for teachers to utilize such approach in teaching writing skill. Through this approach, activities will not only encourage students to work collaboratively, but also embolden them to be effective and skillful writers.

Cite this paper

SalmaEndut,Nik Mohd Rahimi NikYusoff,Mohd YusriKamarudin, (2016) Factors That Influence Efficiency of Writing Essays in Arabic. Creative Education,07,435-442. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.73043


  1. 1. Ahmad, Z. A. (2003). Arabic Writing Skills among Malay Students. Malaysia: Malaya University.

  2. 2. Baba, A. (1997). Statistical Research in Education and Social Sciences. Malaysia: National University of Malaysia.

  3. 3. Baba, S. (2007). Smart Teaching and Learning Strategies in Prewriting Activities. Malaysia: National University of Malaysia.

  4. 4. Boud, D. (2001). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other. London: Kogan Page.

  5. 5. Crow, A., & Crow, L. D. (1983). Educational Psychology for Teachers. Kuala Lumpur: Macmillan.

  6. 6. Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing Motivation in Foreign Language Learning. Language Learning, 40, 45-78.

  7. 7. Examination Board (2007). Report of Quality Candidates Answer for Arabic Language Paper 2. Malaysian Certificate of Education Report, Kuala Lumpur. Ministry of Education, Malaysia.

  8. 8. Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.

  9. 9. Haron, M. (1982). An overview of the Favorite Reading among Secondary School Students in the Tampin, Negeri. Sembilan. Malaysia: Malaya University.

  10. 10. Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2008). Motivation and Writing. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 144-157). New York: Guilford Press.

  11. 11. Jaafar, W. N. W. (2011). Efficiency of Writing Skills among Student Islamic Secondary Class in Kota Setar, Kedah: National University of Malaysia.

  12. 12. Jalaluddin, I., Yunus, M. M., & Yamat, H. (2011). Teachers’ help for Improve Students’ Writing Skills. In: Z. Mahamod, J. L. Abdul Wahab, & M. S., Ibrahim (Eds.) Transformation and Innovation in Education, Malaysia: National University of Malaysia, Publications Faculty of Education.

  13. 13. Jalil, A. G. (1993). Problems of Teaching and Learning Arabic at Maktab Rendah Sains Mara (MRSM). Malaysia: National University of Malaysia.

  14. 14. Johari, M. J. M. (1994). Teaching Writing Skills in Malay Subject at upper Secondary School. Malaysia: National University of Malaysia.

  15. 15. Khalid, O. (1993). Study Arabic in Schools and Higher Education Institute in Malaysia. In: I. A. Rahman, A. Mohd, & M. Y. Muda (Eds.), Issues of Islamic Education in Malaysia: Challenges and Hopes (pp. 210-217). Malaysia: Sultan Zainal Abidin Islamic College.

  16. 16. Konting, M. M. (2005). Education Research Methods. Kuala Lumpur: Macmillan.

  17. 17. Lavelle, E., Smith, J., & O’Ryan, L. (2002). The Writing Approaches of Secondary Students. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 399-418.

  18. 18. Long, J. (2010). Methods of Teaching and Learning Malay. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

  19. 19. Long, J., & Jauyah, D. (1995). Teaching and Learning to Write: The Process Approach. Malay Educators Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 14-15 December 1995, 161-173.

  20. 20. Malaysia, L. P. (2002). Conclusion of Quality Candidates Answer Book, Lower Secondary Assessment, 2002.

  21. 21. Mohamad, B. H. (2009). Level Communication in Arabic among Students Bachelor of Arabic at Public Universities in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 1, 1-14.

  22. 22. Schonell, F. (1981). The Psychology and Teaching of Reading. London: Heinemann.

  23. 23. Scott, B. J., & Vitale, M. R. (2003). Teaching the Writing Process to Students with LD. Intervention in School & Clinic, 38, 220-224.

  24. 24. Senin, H. (1997). Factors That Influence Achievement in the Subjects of History. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

  25. 25. Skurnik, L., & Jeffs, P. M. (1970). Science Attitude Questionnaire. Slough: NFER Publishing House.

  26. 26. Teh, K. S. M. (2009). Arabic Language Learning Strategy Use among Religious Secondary School Students. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

  27. 27. Witte, S. P., Daly, J. A., Faigley, L., & Koch, W. R. (1983). An Instrument for Reporting Composition Courseand Teacher Effectiveness in College Writing Programme. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 243-261.

  28. 28. Yusof, R. (1999). Factors That Influence Efficiency of Writing Essay among Form Four Students. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

  29. 29. Yusoff, N. M. R. N., & Ghani, K. A. (1999). Arabic for the Purpose of Communication: A Study of Challenges in Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Issues of National Education, Bangi, National University of Malaysia, 26-27 November 1998, 231-241.

  30. 30. Zin, A. M. (2006). Review of Multiple Intelligences among Form Four Students. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

  31. 31. Zin, I. M. (2007). Development of Malaysian Multiple Intelligent Test. Bangi: National University of Malaysia.

Appendix A



Please tick (√) in the appropriate compartments respect yourself

1. Gender: Male ( ) Female ( )

2. Age: 14 years old ( ) 15 years old ( )

3. Address: Urban areas ( ) Un urban areas ( )

4. Type of School: SMKA ( ) SMAN ( )

Appendix B


Please circle your response:

Appendix C


Please choose a topic below and write an Arabic essay not less than 100 words.

1. A cooperative shop in my school.

2. Letter for asking money from your father to join a school excursion during the upcoming holidays.

3. The benefits of transport equipment.

4. Accident at one of the main roads nearby.