Journal of Water Resource and Protection
Vol.07 No.05(2015), Article ID:55053,7 pages

Determination of PAHs in Surface Waters from the Doce and Piracicaba Rivers in Brazil

Aniel da Costa Lima1, Fernanda Fernandes Heleno2*, Robson José de Cássia Franco Afonso3, Mauricio Xavier Coutrim3

1Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Curvelo, Brazil

2Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil

3Chemistry Departament, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil

Email: *

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 1 December 2014; accepted 24 March 2015; published 26 March 2015


Sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were determined in water samples from the Piracicaba River and the Doce River in the municipality of Ipatinga, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were extracted by solid-phase extraction and were analyzed by high-per- formance liquid chromatographic with diode-array detector. The limit of detection was as low as 1.3 ng∙L−1. All polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were found above the limit of quantification in water from at least four of the eight sampling points. Benzo[a]pyrene and chrysene were found at concentrations up to 80% above the limit set by Brazilian and European environmental legislation (0.05 µg∙L−1). The isomer ratios of the compounds indicated that crude oil and combustion pro- cesses were the main sources of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.


Monitoring, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Water Quality

1. Introduction

Biogenic and anthropogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), mainly derived from fossil fuel combustion, incineration, production of coke and asphalt, oil refining, aluminium manufacture, and burning of agricultural and forest biomass fuels, can reach water bodies and contaminate rivers due to storm water runoff and discharges of domestic sewage and industrial effluents. In Brazil, which possesses 12% of the global supply of fresh water, the contamination of surface waters is of concern in many regions, including Minas Gerais State, where there is extensive agricultural and mining activity and PAHs are by-products of pyrolysis processes. Sixteen PAHs are listed as priority pollutants for monitoring by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and seven of them are recognized as being carcinogenic to animals and to humans by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). According to Brazilian environmental legislation [1] , water intended for human consumption should not contain concentrations higher than 0.05 µg∙L1 of pyrene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]py- rene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene. European Union legislation is even more rigorous and the sum of annual average concentrations should not exceed 0.03 µg∙L1 for the isomers benzo[b]fluoran- thene and benzo[k]fluoranthene, and 0.002 µg∙L1 for the isomers benzo[g,h,i]perylene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]- pyrene [2] .

The determination of PAHs at such low concentrations requires highly sensitive analytical methods with analyte concentration steps such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) and analysis by chromatographic techniques such as HPLC/FL (fluorescence), HPLC/UV-Vis with or without diode arrays, and GC-MS [3] -[6] .

The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of 16 PAHs listed in the US EPA priority pollutant list in water samples collected in 2008 at eight sampling sites along 10.5 km of the Piracicaba River and the Doce River during two periods, summer and winter of 2008. The PAHs were extracted by SPE and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatographic with diode-array detector (HPLC/DAD). The concentration ratios between 3, 4 and 5-ring PAH were used to identify the possible sources of the PAHs.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

A stock standard solution containing the sixteen PAHs (naphthalene (Nap), acenaphthylene (Acy), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Flu), phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (Ant), fluoranthene (Flt), pyrene (Pyr), benzo[a]anthra- cene (BaA), chrysene (Chr), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DahA), benzo[g,h,i]perylene (BghiP), and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene (IcdP)), purchased from Supelco (Kit 610-N), was prepared in HPLC grade acetonitrile with individual concentrations of 200 mg∙L1. The internal standard (IS) was 1,1’-binaphthyl (BNP, 99%), purchased from Aldrich. All solvents used were purchased from JT Baker. The ultra-pure water was obtained from a LAB-UPW system provided by TKA.

2.2. Sampling of Surface Water

Briefly, water samples (1 L) were collected in triplicate in January 2008, at about 30 cm from the surface at four locations along the Piracicaba River and four locations along the Doce River (Figure 1), in the municipality of Ipatinga (19.46˚S, 42.53˚W) by using amber glass bottles that had been cleaned with nitric acid solution (2.5%, v/v). The sampling was repeated in June 2008.

The width and depth of the rivers at the sampling sites were 50 m and 0.8 m, respectively, for the Doce River, and 40 m and 0.5 m, respectively, for the Piracicaba River. The mean water temperature was 20˚C and the water samples presented high contents of particulate matter in summer. After sampling, the samples were maintained below 4˚C and were immediately transported to the laboratory for analysis.

2.3. PAHs Extraction and Analysis

Before analysis, the samples were filtered using cellulose filter (Quanty, 8.0 µm pore size, 90 mm diameter) and glass fiber filter (Prefilter, 0.45 µm pore size, 47 mm diameter). The filtrates (800 mL) were passed through 3 mL Strata C18-E cartridges (Phenomenex) containing 200 mg of C18 adsorbent, previously conditioned by passing 3 mL of dichloromethane, methanol and deionized water at a flow rate of 5 mL∙min1. Clean ambient air was then passed through the cartridge for 20 min, and the PAHs were eluted with 3 mL of dichloromethane. An aliquot of 50 µL of IS solution (1000 µg∙L1 BNP in acetonitrile) was added to the extracts, the solvent was evaporated to dryness with nitrogen gas, and the extract was resuspended in 500 µL of acetonitrile.

Aliquots (20 µL) of the extract were injected, in triplicate, into a liquid chromatography system (Model 20A, Shimadzu) equipped with an automatic injection module (Model SIL-20AC) and a UV-Vis-DAD detector (Model SPM-M20A). The column (Lichrospher PAH, C18, 250 mm × 3 mm, 5 μm, Agilent) was maintained at

Figure 1. Surface water sampling sites for analysis of PAHs.

40˚C. The mobile phase was acetonitrile/water, with an initial concentration of 60:40 for 5 min, followed by a change to 85:15 over 10 min, then to 95:05 over 10 min, with a hold for 9 min, then to 60:40 over 4 min, with a hold for 2 min. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.6 mL∙min1. The chromatograms were obtained using the maximum absorbance wavelength of each PAH: Nap (254 nm), Acy (220 nm), Ace and Flu (226 nm), Phe (250 nm), Ant (250 nm), Flt (235 nm), Pyr (240 nm), BaA (285 nm), Chr (266 nm), BbF (254 nm), BkF (254 nm), BaP (295 nm), DahA (295 nm), BghiP (295 nm), and IcdP (249 nm).

2.4. Method Validation

The linearity of the method was evaluated using the analytical curves obtained by analyzing standard solutions of PAHs in acetonitrile at concentrations ranging from 5 to 400 µg∙L1.

For each PAH, the limit of detection (LOD) was considered as the sample concentration corresponding to three times the standard deviation of the areas obtained in seven injections of the solution with the lowest concentration used for the calibration curve. The estimated limit of quantification (LOQ) was considered to be three times the LOD.

The accuracy was determined from the recovery of the PAHs added to samples of river water, using three PAH concentration levels (6.0, 24.0, and 62.0 ng∙L1) and seven additions for each level. The precision was calculated using the coefficient of variation obtained from the standard deviations of the mean concentrations of the seven spiked samples at each concentration level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chromatographic Analysis

A standard solution containing 100 µg∙L1 of the sixteen PAHs was injected under different chromatographic conditions in order to optimize the separation of the PAHs. The compounds were identified by comparison of the retention times with those of PAH standards, by spiking with individual PAH standards, and by comparison of the UV-Vis molecular absorption spectra.

It was not possible to resolve Flu and Ace using any of the chromatographic conditions evaluated. The results for samples with measurable peaks at the retention times of these compounds were therefore presented as the sum of the individual compounds. Under the best chromatographic conditions, the PAHs were completely eluted from the column in less than 35 min (Figure 2).

3.2. Method Validation

The pre-concentration factor (the ratio of the sample volume (800 mL) and the extract volume (500 µL) was 1600. For all the PAHs studied, the determination coefficients of the calibration curves were higher than 0.99. The LOD and LOQ values (Table 1) were lower than those obtained in other studies using UV-Vis detection, and were similar to those obtained using fluorescence detection [7] -[9] .

An advantage of UV-Vis detection is that it can be used for a wide range of analytes, while only fluorescent analytes can be determined using a fluorescence detector. The UV-Vis detector is also less expensive than the fluorescence detector and is more frequently available in analytical laboratories.

The accuracy of the method was evaluated based on recovery of the PAHs from spiked samples. The precision was based on the coefficient of variation (CV) of the means of the measured PAH concentrations, following the recommendations of the US EPA [10] .

A sample containing low concentrations of PAHs was spiked with PAH standards at three concentration levels (6.0, 24.0, and 62.0 ng∙L1). Seven replicates of the samples (spiked or without spiking) were subjected to the same extraction process, and a total of 28 extracts were injected into the HPLC system (in triplicate). For all PAHs, the CV values were less than 10% at the three levels of enrichment, with the exception of Nap and BaA spiked with 24.0 ng∙L1 (Table 2). These values are below the 20% recommended by the US EPA for this type of matrix [10] . The recovery of most PAHs was between 70% and 130%, as recommended by the US EPA [10] . Only Acy showed recovery greater than 130%, while BbF was the only PAH with more than four rings that showed recovery greater than 70% at all levels of enrichment. A low recovery of higher molecular weight PAHs from surface waters is expected, because they tend to adhere strongly to colloidal and particulate matter present in the medium, which reduces the percentage of analyte extracted [11] . Similar results have been obtained in other studies [12] .

Figure 2. Chromatogram of the 40 µg∙L−1 mixed PAHs standard in acetonitrile, using the optimum chromatographic conditions and detection at 254 nm.

Table 1. Parameters of the PAH analytical curves: slopes, intercepts, coefficients of determination (r2), and limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)*.

*For surface waters, using a pre-concentration factor of 1600.

Table 2. Precision (coefficient of variation) and accuracy (recovery) values for the determination of PAHs at three levels of enrichment.

3.3. PAHs in Surface Waters from the Doce River and the Piracicaba River

The eight sampling sites were located within the municipality of Ipatinga, Minas Gerais, in southeastern Brazil, an area of rainforest at an altitude of 235 m above sea level, with a tropical semi-humid climate. In summer, the average relative humidity is 84%, the average maximum temperature is 29.0˚C, and average precipitation is 200.5 mm (in January). In winter, the average relative humidity is 78.2%, the average minimum temperature is 11.5˚C, and average precipitation is 11.4 mm (in July). The city of Ipatinga occupies an area of 165 km2 and has 240,000 in habitants. Urban development is above the national average, and all sewage is treated in the city. The main economic activity is industry, representing 54% of the local economy (the average values for Minas Gerais State and Brazil are 32% and 29%, respectively). This is because the urban area hosts one of the largest steel mills in Brazil, which is responsible for the presence of many other industries in the region. Ipatinga has 63,000 vehicles and is the sixth largest city in Minas Gerais State in terms of the number of vehicles.

The PAHs evaluated in this study were found above the LOD in water from at least four of the sampling sites (Table 3). In most samples, PAHs with five and six rings were not detected or were found below the LOQ.

Among the four-ring PAHs, Flu and Pyr were found at higher concentrations. However, of the seven PAHs regulated by Brazilian environmental legislation, only Chr (one sample) and BaP (three samples) were found at levels above the 50 ng∙L1 maximum permissible concentration in surface waters intended for human contact [1] .

The samples collected during the rainy season (January) showed concentrations of total PAHs (ΣPAHs) were well above the levels in the dry period (June). This difference could have been due to greater amounts of PAHs transferred to the rivers from the atmosphere and dry surfaces following rainfall.

PAHs with three rings represented more than 50% of the PAHs in all samples, with the exception of the sample collected at Site 2 in January. These three-ring PAHs (Ace, Flu, Phe, and Ant), together with Nap, represent the most volatile compounds of this class of substances. The presence of Nap in environmental samples is related to vehicular and industrial emissions from the combustion of fuels derived from oil. Here, the Nap con- centrations were well below the levels found elsewhere; concentrations as high as 9100 ng∙L1 were reported by

Table 3. Concentrations of PAHs (ng∙L−1) found in samples collected from the Piracicaba River and the Doce River in January and June 2008.

*not determined; **below the limit of detection; ***below the limit of quantification.

Doong and Lin [13] , who evaluated 48 water samples collected at 12 sites along the Gao-Ping River. In the present case, the low Nap concentrations were probably related to the large number of cars fitted with catalytic converters in the municipality. Acy, Phe, Flt, and Pyr were found at higher concentrations, and the average concentration of Phe was more than three times greater than the concentrations of the other compounds. Emissions from diesel combustion, coal stoves, vehicle exhaust, and urban dusts are the likely sources of these PAHs [14] .

Similar results have been reported by other authors who evaluated PAHs in rivers with similar characteristics to the Doce and Piracicaba Rivers [15] [16] . However, the concentrations measured here were much lower than found previously. Ardag et al. [6] described high concentrations of PAHs in water samples collected at eight sites along the Menderes River in a highly industrialized region of Turkey (ΣPAHs between 1800 ng∙L1 and 24,900 ng∙L1). The highest concentration of BbF (6600 ng∙L1) was almost one thousand times greater than the highest concentration of BbF found in the present study. These results show that the impact of PAHs in the Menderes River in Turkey is much higher than in the Doce and Piracicaba Rivers in Brazil.

In another Brazilian study, Brum & Netto [17] evaluated the same PAHs in surface waters of the Tripuí River, near a large aluminium factory located in the urban area of OuroPreto city. The concentrations of PAHs were higher than those found here, with a maximum ΣPAHs value of 6500 ng∙L1 and the highest individual PAH concentration for Flu (2960 ng∙L1).

It is difficult to accurately identify the sources of PAHs found in the samples from the Piracicaba and Doce Rivers. In general, higher molecular weight PAHs originate from incomplete pyrolysis at high temperatures, such as during the burning of coal for energy production or the manufacturing process of coke, while the lower molecular weight PAHs originate from oil or the products of its refining. Therefore, PAH isomer ratios can be used to assess the likely emission sources [14] . The ratios of the isomers with three rings are used for sources related to oil, while ratios between the 4 and 6 ring isomers are used for pyrolytic sources. Some of the ratios used are: [Ant/(Ant + Phe)], [Flt/(Flt + Pyr)], [BaA/(BaA + Chr)], and [IcdP/(BghiP + IcdP)] [18] . Of these four isomer ratios, the ratio of PAHs with 6 rings was not used, because these PAHs were not quantified in four of the 13 samples. The ratios [Ant/(Ant + Phe)] and [BaA/(BaA + Chr)] could only be used with the results of the first campaign because Ant and BaA were not quantified in any sample collected during the second campaign. For the first campaign, the values of [Ant/(Ant + Phe)] were below 0.1, indicating that petroleum-derived compounds were more important, compared to those originating from combustion processes [15] . However, the ratios of 4-ring PAH isomers indicated that combustion processes also contributed to the origin of these PAHs. For half of the sites evaluated, the values obtained for [BaA/(BaA + Chr)] were between 0.20 and 0.35, and at one site, the value was above 0.35. This indicates that in addition to crude oil compounds, combustion was also an important source of the PAHs [15] . Moreover, in many samples the concentration of Flt was slightly higher than that of Pyr, and the ratio [Flt/(Pyr + Flt)] was greater than 0.5, indicating that pyrolytic combustion may also have been a source of these PAHs [15] . For samples collected at Sites 7 and 8 during the rainy season, all the isomer ratios used in this study indicated that the PAHs mainly originated from petroleum products. However, for the samples collected at Site 7 during the dry period, the [Flt/(Flt + Pyr)] values were lower than 0.5, suggesting that combustion processes were also important in this case. These sites were located downstream of the discharge of a small river (the Ipanema River) into the Doce River, and this small river could have received inputs of runoff water contaminated with oil products, since it flowed through the urban area. During the dry period, this contribution was less important due to lack of rainfall, so that the contribution from deposition of airborne particulate matter, rich in various products of combustion, was more important.

4. Conclusions

The method used in this study provided satisfactory figures of merit for the determination of PAHs in surface water samples from urban areas impacted by heavy industry and traffic.

Although the concentrations of PAHs found in water samples from the Piracicaba River and the Doce River in the municipality of Ipatinga were lower than those found in similar studies in other regions, it was possible to infer the likely sources of the PAHs.


The authors are grateful to the Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for provision of a scholarship, and to the Research Support Foundation of Minas Gerais State (FAPEMIG) for a research grant (CEX-APQ-01113-08).


  1. Brasil, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Urbano e Meio Ambiente (2005) Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA); Resolução do n. 357, de 17/03/05, Brasília.
  2. European Companian (2008) Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Environmental Quality Standards in the Field of Water Policy, Amending and Subsequently Repealing. Official Journal of the European Union, L 348, 84-97.
  3. Pichon, V. (2000) Solid-Phase Extraction for Multiresidue Analysis of Organic Contaminants in Water. Journal of Chromatography A, 885, 195-215.
  4. Olivella, M.À. (2006) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Rainwater and Surface Waters of Lake Maggiore, a Subalpine Lake in Northern Italy. Chemosphere, 63, 116-131.
  5. Fan, S.-L., Zhao, L. and Lin, J.-M. (2007) Flocculation-Ultrasonic Assisted Extraction and Solid Phase Clean-Up for Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Rich in Colloidal Particulate with High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Ultraviolet-Fluorescence Detection. Talanta, 72, 1618-1624.
  6. Ardag, H., Ozel, M.Z. and Sen, A. (2011) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water from the Menderes River, Turkey. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 86, 221-225.
  7. Brum, D.M., Cassella, R.J. and Netto, A.D.P. (2008) Multivariate Optimization of a Liquid-Liquid Extraction of the EPA-PAHs from Natural Contaminated Waters Prior to Determination by Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection. Talanta, 74, 1392-1399.
  8. Jin, J., Zhang, Z.P., Li, Y., Qi, P.P., Lu, X.B., Wang, J.C., Chen, J.P. and Su, F. (2010) Enrichment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Seawater with Magnesium Oxide Microspheres as a Solid-Phase Extraction Sorbent. Analytica Chimica Acta, 678, 183-188.
  9. Okuda, T., Naoi, D., Tenmoku, M., Tanaka, S., He, K., Ma, Y., Yang, F., Lei, Y., Jia, Y. and Zhang, D. (2006) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Aerosol in Beijing, China, Measured by Aminopropylsilane Chemically- Bonded Stationary-Phase Column Chromatography and HPLC/Fluorescence Detection. Chemosphere, 65, 427-435.
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Determinative Chromatographic Separations. EPA, Washington DC, Method 8000B.
  11. Jeanneau, L., Faure, P. and Jardé, E. (2007) Influence of Natural Organic Matter on the Solid-Phase Extraction of Organic Micropollutants: Application to the Water-Extract from Highly Contaminated River Sediment. Journal of Chromatography A, 1173, 1-9.
  12. Chen, Y., Zhu, L. and Zhou, R. (2007) Characterization and Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon in Surface Water and Sediment from Qiantang River, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141, 148-155.
  13. Doong, R-A. and Lin, Y-T. (2004) Characterization and Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contaminations in Surface Sediment and Water from Gao-Ping River, Taiwan. Water Research, 38, 1733-1744.
  14. Yunker, M.B., Snowdon, L.R., Macdonald, R.W., Smith, J.N., Fowler, M.G., Skibo, D.N., McLaughlin, F.A., Danyushevskaya, A.I., Petrova, V.I. and Ivanov, G.I. (1996) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Composition and Potential Sources for Sediment Samples from the Beaufort and Barents Seas. Environmental Science & Technology, 30, 1310-1320.
  15. Deng, H., Peng, P.A., Huang, W. and Song, J. (2006) Distribution and Loadings of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Xijiang River in Guangdong, South China. Chemosphere, 64, 1401-1411.
  16. Guo, W., He, M., Yang, Z., Lin, C., Quan, X. and Wang, H. (2007) Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water, Suspended Particulate Matter and Sediment from Daliao River Watershed, China. Chemosphere, 68, 93-104.
  17. Brum, D.M. and Netto, A.D.P. (2009) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tripuí River, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, 447-453.
  18. Yunker, M.B., Macdonald, R.W., Vingarzan, R., Mitchell, R.H., Goyette, D. and Sylvestre, S. (2002) PAHs in the Fraser River Basin: A Critical Appraisal of PAH Ratios as Indicators of PAH Source and Composition. Organic Geo- chemistry, 33, 489-515.


*Corresponding author.