Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.09 No.03(2018), Article ID:82318,30 pages
10.4236/jmp.2018.93026
The Application of the Generalized Differential Formulation of the First Law of Thermodynamics for Evidence of the Tidal Mechanism of Maintenance of the Energy and Viscous-Thermal Dissipative Turbulent Structure of the Mesoscale Oceanic Eddies
Sergey V. Simonenko, Vyacheslav B. Lobanov
V.I. Il’ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received: December 22, 2017; Accepted: February 4, 2018; Published: February 7, 2018
ABSTRACT
The practical significance of the established generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics (formulated for the rotational coordinate system) is evaluated (for the first time and for the mesoscale oceanic eddies) by deriving the general (viscous-compressible-thermal) and partial (incompressible, viscous-thermal) local conditions of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy located inside of the individual fluid region of the thermally heterogeneous viscous (compressible and incompressible, respectively) heat-conducting stratified fluid over the two-dimensional bottom topography characterized by the horizontal coordinate along a horizontal axis X. Based on the derived partial (incompressible) local condition (of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and viscous-thermal dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy) and using the calculated vertical distributions of the mean viscous dissipation rate per unit mass and the mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass in four regions near the observed mesoscale (periodically topographically trapped by nearly two-dimensional bottom topography) eddy located near the northern region of the Yamato Rise in the Japan Sea, the combined analysis of the energy structure of the eddy and the viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence is presented. The convincing evidence is presented of the tidal mechanism of maintenance of the eddy energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence (produced by the breaking internal gravity waves generated by the eddy) in three regions near the Yamato Rise subjected to the observed mesoscale eddy near the northern region of the Yamato Rise of the Japan Sea.
Keywords:
Generalized Formulation of the First Law of Thermodynamics, Cosmic Gravitation, Small-scale Dissipative Turbulence, Viscous and Thermal Dissipation Rates, Mesoscale Oceanic Eddies, Internal Tide

1. Introduction
It is well known that the problem of turbulence is “the last great unsolved problem of classical physics” [1] , the solution of which has the practical significance for humankind. Based on the assumption of the local thermodynamic equilibrium [2] , De Groot and Mazur [3] , and Gyarmati [4] defined the macroscopic kinetic energy per unit mass as the sum of the macroscopic translational kinetic energy per unit mass and the macroscopic internal rotational kinetic energy per unit mass . We derived [5] the formula for the macroscopic kinetic energy per unit mass generalizing the classical expression [3] [4] by taking into account the shear component of the macroscopic continuum motion related with the rate of strain tensor [1] [5] . The macroscopic kinetic energy per unit mass is presented [5] as the sum of the macroscopic translational kinetic energy per unit mass [3] [4] [5] [6] and three Galilean invariants: the classical macroscopic internal rotational kinetic energy per unit mass [3] [4] , the established [5] macroscopic non-equilibrium internal shear kinetic energy per unit mass and the established [5] macroscopic non-equilibrium internal kinetic energy of a shear-rotational coupling per unit mass with a small correction . The generalized formula [5] for the macroscopic kinetic energy per unit mass was the basis of the non-equilibrium statistical thermohydrodynamic theory [5] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] of the three-dimensional isotropic homogeneous small-scale dissipative turbulence. The physical correctness of the non-equilibrium statistical thermohydrodynamic theory was demonstrated [5] [7] - [13] for laboratory and oceanic three-dimensional isotropic homogeneous small-scale dissipative stratified turbulence in the wide range of the energy-containing length scales from the inner Kolmogorov length scale [14] to the length scales proportional to the Ozmidov length scale [5] .
The classical Gibbs’ differential formulation [2] [15] of the first law of thermodynamics was generalized [7] [8] [9] [16] - [21] (for the small [7] and for the finite continuum regions considered in the Galilean frame of reference) by taking into account (along with the classical [2] [3] [4] [15] infinitesimal change of heat and the classical [2] [3] [4] [15] infinitesimal change
of the internal thermal energy
) the infinitesimal increment
of the macroscopic kinetic energy
(which contains (for the for the small continuum region
[5] [7] ) the classical macroscopic translational kinetic energy [3] [4] , the classical macroscopic internal rotational kinetic energy [3] [4] , the established [5] macroscopic non-equilibrium internal shear kinetic energy and the established [5] macroscopic non-equilibrium internal kinetic energy of a shear-rotational coupling), the infinitesimal increment
of the gravitational potential energy
, the generalized expression for the infinitesimal work
[7] done by the non-potential terrestrial stress forces (characterized by general symmetric stress tensor
[4] ) acting on the boundary surface
of the continuum region
, the infinitesimal increment
(which is not presented in the generalized differential formulation [7] of the first law of thermodynamics for the small continuum region
) of energy due to the combined cosmic and terrestrial non-stationary energy gravitational influence
on the continuum region
. We founded the generalized thermohydrogravidynamic model [9] [16] [17] [18] of the earthquake focal region based on the generalized differential formulation [9] [16] - [21] of the first law of thermodynamics and using the generalized expression for the infinitesimal work
(for the Newtonian continuum [9] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] ) together with the generalized expression [5] [7] [8] [16] [17] [18] for the instantaneous macroscopic kinetic energy
of the small macroscopic individual continuum region
. We founded [9] [21] also the generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics for the deformed one-component individual finite continuum region
(considered in the rotational coordinate system K related with the rotating Earth) subjected to the non-stationary Newtonian terrestrial gravitational field, the tidal, Coriolis and centrifugal forces, and non-potential terrestrial stress forces (characterized by general symmetric stress tensor
[4] ) acting on the boundary surface
of the individual finite continuum region
. It was pointed out [21] that the generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics [9] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] (for the Galilean frame of reference) is preferable (with respect to the derived generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics [9] [21] formulated for the rotational coordinate system) for consideration of the regional and global seismotectonic activity of the Earth since it gives the possibility to not consider the variable (in time and space) tidal, Coriolis and centrifugal forces acting on the individual finite continuum region
of the Earth. However, in this article we shall consider (for the first time) the established [9] [21] generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics (formulated for the rotational coordinate system K related with the rotating Earth) for analysis of the energy and dissipative structure of the mesoscale eddy observed [22] in the northwestern part of the Japan Sea near the Yamato Rise. The aim of this article is to bring out the practical significance of the established generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics [9] [21] (formulated for the rotational coordinate system K related with the rotating Earth) for foundation of the tidal mechanism (related with cosmic non-stationary gravitational field of the Moon) of maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative turbulent (not isotropic and not homogeneous) structure of the mesoscale oceanic eddies (especially, located near the Yamato Rise of the Japan Sea [22] ). To do this, in Section 2 we present the equivalent generalized differential formulations (11) and (17) of the first law of thermodynamics [9] [21] for the deformed one-component individual finite continuum region
(considered in the rotational coordinate system K related with rotating Earth) subjected to the non-stationary Newtonian terrestrial gravitational field, the tidal forces (related with the cosmic non-stationary gravitational field), the Coriolis and centrifugal forces, and the non-potential terrestrial stress forces acting on the boundary surface
of the individual finite continuum region
. Based on the established [9] [21] generalized differential formulation (17) of the first law of thermodynamics and the related evolution equation (18) for the total mechanical energy
of the deformed finite individual macroscopic region
of the Newtonian continuum (considered in the rotating coordinate system), we formulate in Section 3 the general and partial (incompressible) local conditions ((29) and (30), respectively) of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative (viscous-thermal-compressible and viscous-thermal, respectively) turbulent structures of the mesoscale eddy located inside of the individual fluid region
over the two-dimensional bottom topography
characterized by the horizontal coordinate
along the horizontal axis X. To evaluate the partial (incompressible) local condition (30) (formulated based on the internal tide generation model [23] and considering the thermally heterogeneous incompressible viscous Newtonian fluid characterized by the classical [6] thermal dissipation rate per unit mass
and the classical [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [14] [24] local viscous dissipation rate per unit mass
), in Section 4, we present the calculated vertical
distributions of the mean viscous dissipation rate per unit mass
characterizing the vertical viscous dissipative structure of turbulence in four regions in the vicinity of the mesoscale eddy. The vertical distributions of
are
calculated based on parametrization (45) established using the analysis of the CTD measurements [22] for four regions in the vicinity of mesoscale eddy observed in the northwestern part of the Japan Sea near the Yamato Rise on 25 February-9 March, 2003 in the cruise of R/V Akademik M.A. Lavrentyev. In Section 5, we present the calculated vertical distributions of the mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass
characterizing the vertical thermal dissipative structure of turbulence in four regions in the vicinity of the mesoscale eddy. In Section 5, we present also the calculated mean (for all stations in each considered region in the vicinity of the mesoscale eddy) vertical distributions
(of the mean viscous-thermal dissipation rates per unit mass
) characterizing the vertical viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence in four regions in the vicinity of the mesoscale eddy.
Based on the partial (incompressible) local condition (30), in Section 6, we present the combined analysis of the energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence in the mesoscale (periodically topographically trapped [22] [25] [26] ) eddy located near the northern region of the Yamato Rise in the Japan Sea. In Section 7, we present the summary of main results and conclusion.
2. The Generalized Differential Formulation of the First Law of Thermodynamics for the Rotational Coordinate System Related with the Rotating Earth
Let us consider an individual finite continuum region 





The local hydrodynamic velocity 

where, 


Figure 1. The rotational Cartesian coordinate system K centred at the mass center of the rotating Earth and the Lagrangian coordinate system 

arbitrary symmetric stress tensor [4] , 










The pressure tensor 

defined by the delta-tensor


determines the time evolution of the specific (per unit mass) internal thermal energy u by taking into account the specific volume



which takes into account the density of the heat flux 
We use the classical de Groot and Mazur expression [3] for the entropy production (per unit mass) 

where T is the absolute temperature. The density of the heat flux 

where 


where

is the classical [3] - [8] [14] [24] local viscous dissipation rate per unit mass (in the Newtonian continuum characterized by the local coefficient of molecular kinematic viscosity 
tensor 

is the classical [3] [4] [6] [7] viscous-compressible dissipation rate per unit mass (in the Newtonian continuum characterized by the coefficient of molecular kinematic viscosity 


is the classical [3] [6] thermal dissipation rate per unit mass determined by the coefficient 

Based on the general equation (1), the decomposition (2), the differential formulation (3) and the heat equation (4) [3] , we derived [9] [21] the generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics (for the symmetric stress tensor 


taking into account the classical differential (during the differential time interval






the differential change 


the generalized [9] [21] differential work

done by non-potential terrestrial stress forces acting on the boundary surface 




due to the non-stationary terrestrial Newtonian gravitational field, and the tidal-centrifugal differential work 

done by the combined tidal and centrifugal forces acting on the considered individual continuum region 

Based on relations (11), (12), (13), (14), (15) and (16), we obtained [9] [21] the equivalent generalized differential formulation of the first law of thermodynamics (for rotational coordinate system

Based on the generalized differential formulation (17) of the first law of thermodynamics, we derived [9] [21] the evolution equation for the total mechanical energy 


which will be used in the next Section 3 for formulation of the general (compressible) and partial (incompressible) local conditions of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative structure of the mesoscale oceanic eddy located over the two-dimensional bottom topography. Based on the evolution equation (18) and the expression (7) for the total kinetic energy dissipation rate per unit mass 


3. The General (Compressible) and Partial (Incompressible) Local Conditions of the Tidal Maintenance of the Quasi-stationary Energy and Dissipative Turbulent Structure of the Mesoscale Eddy Located over the Two-dimensional Bottom Topography
To derive the general (compressible) and partial (incompressible) local conditions of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy located inside of the individual fluid region 









pressure p on the total mechanical energy 
continuum region


















Let us consider the ninth term on the right hand side of the evolution Equation (18). According to the internal tide generation models [23] for the two-dimensional bottom topography


where 





where

is the total barotropic kinetic energy production per unit time (in the individual macroscopic region


is the total baroclinic mechanical energy production per unit time 



According to the internal tide generation models [23] describing the generation of the internal semidiurnal tide by the barotropic tide over the two-dimensional bottom topography (determined by the bottom depth 


where 







According to the internal tide generation models [23] , the baroclinic tidal force 


where the stability frequency 

depending on the local gravity acceleration g, the distribution of the averaged potential density 


of the total semidiurnal velocity field as the sum of the barotropic (




directed to the unit mass of sea water due to the interaction of the barotropic (surface) tide with the two-dimensional bottom topography




depending on the vertical depth (coordinate) z.
To found the general (compressible) and partial (incompressible) local conditions of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy over the two-dimensional bottom topography








Taking into account 



of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and viscous-thermal dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy located inside of the individual fluid region 


4. Spatial Spectra of Temperature Fluctuations and the Viscous Dissipative Structure of Turbulence in Four Regions near the Mesoscale Eddy
Mesoscale eddies of the Japan Sea are significant factor of oceanic structure and dynamics [31] related with the development of the submesoscale motion, which maintains the strong turbulent mixing [22] . The experimental studies [22] [31] suggested that the turbulent mixing in the eddies core and the subsequent transport of trapped waters is the significant mechanism of formation of the large-scale structure of the Japan Sea intermediate waters. Taking into account a large number of the eddies and their long life-time, we pointed out [22] the significance of eddies for the vertical transport of heat, salt, dissolved oxygen and the biogenic elements in the deep layers the Japan Sea.
The coexistence of internal gravity waves with mesoscale eddies was revealed [32] based on satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images in the sea south of the Grand Banks. It was shown (based on the linear theoretical analysis [33] ) that the shear instability (related with the variability of the eddy current field) is the dynamical mechanism of internal gravity wave generation.
It was shown (based on the revised estimates [34] of net energy transfers between the internal gravity wave and the mesoscale eddy fields) that the wave-eddy coupling is a significant regional source of internal gravity waves. It was confirmed [35] that the dominant source of energy for the internal wave field in the Gulf Stream area is related with the dissipation of mesoscale eddies due to the generation of internal gravity waves during the mesoscale eddy-internal wave interaction.
The prevalent mechanism of the turbulence generation in the oceanic thermocline was associated [30] previously with the breaking internal gravity waves due to the shear instability. We have the proportionality (of the Richardson number Ri and the stability frequency N) 







To study the fine structure of the temperature field related with an anticyclonic eddy, the CTD survey of northwestern part of the Japan Sea was carried out on 25 February-9 March, 2003 in the cruise of R/V Akademik M.A. Lavrentyev [22] . Special observations were done crossing an anticyclonic eddy of around 70 km in diameter located just to the north of Yamato Rise (see Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b)). Numbers of some stations (St.) referred in the analysis are indicated on Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b).
To analyze the calculated [38] spatial spectra 
The calculated [38] spatial spectra 

for the internal gravity waves (characterized by the small spatial wave numbers k) and for the active overturning turbulence (for large k).
We see on Figure 3(a) that the core of the eddy is characterized by the practically identical spatial spectra 


Figure 2. Distribution of water temperature (˚C) at 150 m depth (a) and along meridional section crossing an anticyclonic eddy (b) in the northwestern Japan Sea on 25 February-9 March, 2003.




Figure 3. The calculated spatial spectra 
we can assume that the mesoscale anticyclonic eddy (located just to the north of Yamato Rise, see Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b)) generates the breaking internal gravity waves, which produce the intense small-scale dissipative turbulence and related strong turbulent mixing [22] in the mesoscale eddy characterized by the fine microstructure of the temperature field characterized by the suggested [37] dependences (31) for the calculated [38] spatial spectra 
It was evaluated [39] that the viscous dissipation rate (per unit mass) 


reveals also the similar remarkable coexistence of strong stratification, extremely large turbulent kinetic energy and extremely large viscous dissipation rate 


Based on the Kolmogorov’s refined hypothesis [24] , we founded [10] that the energy spatial spectrum (of the oceanic turbulence) 


where 





The power 

for very high (large) turbulent Reynolds numbers. The power 


The power 

The energy spatial spectrum (33) corresponds to the spatial spectrum 


characterized by the same power-law dependence 



Using the obtained experimental power 


by substituting the relation (37) into the classical condition [30]

where 

for the interaction time 



of the anisotropic dissipative turbulence characterized by the power 



for the coefficient of turbulent (eddy) viscosity

where 







and equating the relation (44) with the obtained relation (43), we obtained [38] the expression for the mean viscous dissipation rate per unit mass

used for the calculation of 
The numerical coefficient 

and under condition 





The founded parameters












Figure 4. The calculated vertical distributions of the viscous dissipation rate per unit mass 
with the breaking internal gravity waves [31] [37] [39] generating the anisotropic intermittent (locally strong) dissipative turbulence [38] of the frontal zone (shown on Figure 2(a)) and the edge region of the observed mesoscale eddy.
5. The Thermal and Viscous-thermal Dissipative Structures of Turbulence in Four Regions near the Mesoscale Eddy
The vertical distributions of the mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 




for various vertical subranges 








Figure 5. The calculated vertical distributions of the mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 
frontal zone (Figure 5(c)) and in the subarctic waters (Figure 5(d)). The numerical calculations (shown on Figure 5) demonstrate the increased mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 
We calculate the averaged (based on the all stations in the considered regions (a), (b), (c) and (d)) vertical distributions 


where the averaged (based on the all stations in the considered regions (a), (b), (c) and (d)) vertical distributions 



The calculated averaged vertical interpolated distributions of the mean viscous-thermal dissipation rates per unit mass 




Figure 6. The calculated averaged vertical interpolated distributions of the mean viscous-thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 
6. The Combined Analysis of the Energy and Viscous-Thermal Dissipative Structure of Turbulence in Four Regions near the Mesoscale Eddy
The partial (incompressible) local condition (30) gives the partial local normalized condition (for the calculated distributions of 


between the normalized (on the maximal value) local mean viscous-thermal
dissipation rate per unit mass 

The proportionality (49) leads to the corresponding proportionality (for the mean distributions obtained by averaging of the several distributions corresponding to the different stations in each considered region):

between the normalized averaged (for several stations in each considered region) local mean viscous-thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 

7(a) and Figure 7(d) (especially) demonstrate the satisfactory proportionality




Figure 7. The calculated normalized averaged (for several stations of the eddy core (a) and for the subarctic waters (d)) local mean viscous-thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 



(50) for the eddy core (Figure 7(a)) and for the subarctic waters (Figure 7(d)). However, we can see the significant difference between 

We see the satisfactory numerical fulfilment (shown on Figure 7(d)) of the derived non-dimensional partial local condition (50) (derived from the partial
incompressible local condition (30)) for the distributions 

the all stations (stations 30, 31, 42, 43 and 44) of the subarctic waters. We see for the Figure 7(d) (corresponding to the subarctic waters, which are not subjected to the influence of the observed eddy) the more remarkable correspondence (for the range of depth 300 ÷ 2700 m) of the calculated normalized averaged (for
several stations of the subarctic waters (d)) local mean viscous-thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 



(incompressible) local condition (30) of the quasi-stationary energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of the semidiurnal baroclinic tidal motion of the viscous incompressible heat-conducting stratified vortical viscous fluid (over the two-dimensional bottom topography) in the subarctic waters of the Japan Sea.
We use only St. 35 at the edge of the eddy (Figure 7(b)) and St. 36 in the frontal zone (Figure 7(c)) since the different stations from the edge of the eddy and the frontal zone (see Figure 2(a)) have the very large variance of the depth of the sea bottom. The calculated normalized local baroclinic mechanical energies production per unit mass 




The experimental results (of the acoustic tomography of the large-scale heterogeneities in the ocean [51] ) revealed the significant energy losses related with the propagation of the acoustic signal through the anticyclonic oceanic eddy. According to the first point of view, the revealed significant difference between 


According to the second (more adequate) point of view (taking into account a possible influence of the viscous-compressible dissipation rate per unit mass 





The existence of the internal gravity waves is confirmed (based on our statistical analysis of the temperature fluctuations given in Section 4) by the computed spatial spectra 




Thus, the calculated dependences (which have the more distinct differences between the calculated distributions in the range of depth 500 ÷ 1400 m of the eddy core for Figure 7(a), below the depth of near 300 m at the edge of the eddy for Figure 7(b) and below the depth of near 500 m in the frontal zone for Figure 7(c)) give the obvious evidence (for three regions subjected to the influence of the observed eddy) that the semidiurnal baroclinic internal tide [29] (generated by the semidiurnal barotropic tidal current over the two-dimensional bottom topography [23] ) is the significant energy source of maintenance of the eddy energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence [38] (produced by the breaking internal gravity waves [30] [36] [37] generated by the eddy [22] [32] [34] [35] due to the shear instability [33] ) in three regions (the eddy core (Figure 7(a)), the edge of the eddy (Figure 7(b)) and the frontal zone (Figure 7(c))) near the Yamato Rise subjected to the observed mesoscale eddy.
7. The Summary of Main Results and Conclusion
Based on the evolution equation (18) (deduced from the established [9] [21] generalized differential formulation (17) of the first law of thermodynamics for the rotational coordinate system related with the rotating Earth) for the total mechanical energy 










To use the formulated partial (incompressible) local condition (30), we have presented the analysis of the CTD observations [22] [38] made on 25 February-9 March, 2003 in the cruise of R/V Akademik M. A. Lavrentyev in the northwestern part of the Japan Sea including the area of mesoscale anticyclonic eddy (shown on Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b)) located near the northern region of the Yamato Rise. We have presented in Section 4 the calculated (based on the analysis of the CTD measurements [22] for four regions in the vicinity of mesoscale eddy) vertical distributions of the mean viscous dissipation rate per unit mass 



distributions of


of the eddy (Figure 4(b)) and in the frontal zone (Figure 4(c)) have confirmed the established [22] existence of the strong submesoscale motion [22] (related with the breaking internal gravity waves [33] [34] [36] [37] ) generating the anisotropic dissipative turbulence (characterized by the powers 
Based on the classical [3] [6] relation (10) for the thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 

(47)) 
The calculated vertical distributions of the mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 
mean thermal dissipation rate per unit mass 
intermediate maximums near the depth of 2000 m for all stations located in the eddy core (Figure 5(a)), at the edge of the eddy (Figure 5(b)), in the frontal zone (Figure 5(c)) and in the subarctic waters (Figure 5(d)). Based on the
obtained vertical distributions of 

averaged (using the all stations in four considered regions shown on Figure 2(a))
vertical distributions (shown on Figures 6(a)-(d)) of the averaged viscous-thermal dissipation rates per unit mass 
(48)) characterizing the averaged vertical viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence in four regions near the mesoscale eddy (see Figure 2(a)). The
obtained distributions of 

characterized by the deep intermediate maximums near the depth of 2000 m for the eddy core (Figure 6(a)), for the edge of the eddy (Figure 6(b)), for frontal zone (Figure 6(c)) and for the subarctic waters (Figure 6(d)).
Based on the derived partial (incompressible) local condition (30) (of the tidal maintenance of the quasi-stationary energy and viscous-thermal dissipative turbulent structure of the mesoscale eddy located inside of the individual fluid region 


vertical distributions of 


Figure 6(d)), we have presented in Section 6 the combined analysis of the energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence in four regions near the mesoscale (periodically topographically trapped [22] [25] [26] ) eddy located near the northern region of the Yamato Rise (characterized by the nearly two-dimensional bottom topography
averaged distributions 

and averaging of the several distributions corresponding to the all stations (Sts. 30, 31, 42, 43 and 44) of the subarctic waters. This remarkable correspondence
(between 

emphasize a remarkable association between structure (related in the considered case with the structure of the normalized averaged local baroclinic mechanical energy production per unit mass 

Taking into account that the calculated normalized local baroclinic mechanical energies production per unit mass 


viscous-thermal dissipation rate per unit mass
on the partial incompressible local condition (30)) that the semidiurnal baroclinic internal tide (generated by the semidiurnal barotropic tidal current over the nearly two-dimensional bottom topography [23] in the Japan Sea [29] near the Yamato Rise) is the significant energy source of maintenance of the eddy energy and viscous-thermal dissipative structure of turbulence (produced by the breaking internal gravity waves [30] [36] [37] generated by the eddies [22] [32] [34] [35] due to the shear instability [33] ) in three regions near the Yamato Rise (the eddy core (Figure 7(a)), the edge of the eddy (Figure 7(b)) and the frontal zone (Figure 7(c))) subjected to the observed mesoscale eddy.
Acknowledgements
Avoid the stilted expression, authors thank reviewers for significant remarks and questions taken into account with gratitude for correction of the article. Authors thank Mrs. A.V. Sereda for help in numerical calculations and Mr. I.A. Kuskov for help in graphic presentation of the calculated results. One of us (S. V. S.) thanks with gratitude Jane GAO, Editorial Assistant of JMP for the best editorial assistance.
Cite this paper
Simonenko, S.V. and Lobanov, V.B. (2018) The Application of the Generalized Differential Formulation of the First Law of Thermodynamics for Evidence of the Tidal Mechanism of Maintenance of the Energy and Viscous-Thermal Dissipative Turbulent Structure of the Mesoscale Oceanic Eddies. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 357-386. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.93026
References
- 1. Saffman, P.G. (1997) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 355, 1949-1956. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1997.0097
- 2. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1976) Theoretical Physics, Vol. V, Statistical Physics. 3rd Edition, Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)
- 3. De Groot, S.R. and Mazur, P. (1962) Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
- 4. Gyarmati, I. (1970) Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Field Theory and Variational Principles. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51067-0
- 5. Simonenko, S.V. (2004) Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 29, 107-123.https://doi.org/10.1515/JNETDY.2004.007
- 6. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1988) Theoretical Physics, Vol. VI, Hydrodynamics. 4th Edition, Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)
- 7. Simonenko, S.V. (2006) Non-Equilibrium Statistical Thermohydrodynamics of Turbulence. Nauka, Moscow.
- 8. Simonenko, S.V. (2012) Fundamentals of the Non-Equilibrium Statistical Thermohydrodynamics of Turbulence. Proceedings of the International conference “Fluxes and Structures in Fluids: Physics of Geospheres”, Vladivostok, 27-30 September 2011, Nauka, Moscow, 100-106.
- 9. Simonenko, S.V. (2014) International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention, 3, 22-58.
- 10. Simonenko, S.V. (2006) Non-Equilibrium Statistical Thermohydrodynamics, Foundation of the Theory of the Small-scale Turbulence and the Tolerances Theory. Pacific State University of Economics Press, Vladivostok. (In Russian)
- 11. Simonenko, S.V. (2011) Fundamentals of the Non-Equilibrium Statistical Thermohydrodynamics of Turbulence. Proceedings of the 7th All-Russia Symposium “Physics of Geospheres”, Vladivostok, 5-9 September 2011, Dalnauka, Vladivostok, 495-499. (In Russian)
- 12. Simonenko, S.V., Varlaty, E.P. and Pavlova, E.P. (2010) Pacific Oceanography, 5, 77-87.
- 13. Simonenko, S.V., Varlaty, E.P., Sereda, A.V. and Cheranev, M.Y. (2012) The High-Frequency Internal Gravity Waves and Dissipative Turbulence in a Shelf Zone of the Japan Sea. Proceedings of the International Conference “Fluxes and Structures in Fluids: Physics of Geospheres”, Vladivostok, 27-30 September 2011, Nauka, Moscow, 113-119.
- 14. Kolmogorov, A.N. (1941) Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 30, 299-303.
- 15. Gibbs, J.W. (1873) Transactions of the Connecticut Academy, 2, 309-342.
- 16. Simonenko, S.V. (2007) Statistical Thermohydrodynamics of Irreversible Strike-Slip-Rotational Processes. In: Milanovsky, E.E., Ed., Rotational Processes in Geology and Physics, KomKniga, Moscow, 225-251. (In Russian)
- 17. Simonenko, S.V. (2007) Thermohydrogravidynamics of the Solar System. Institute of Technology and Business Press, Nakhodka.
- 18. Simonenko, S.V. (2013) International Journal of Geophysics, Article ID: 519829, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/519829
- 19. Simonenko, S.V. (2014) Journal of Advances in Physics, 4, 484-516. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2014/10766
- 20. Simonenko, S.V. (2014) British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4, 3563-3630.
- 21. Simonenko, S.V. (2015) American Journal of Earth Sciences, 2, 106-122.
- 22. Lobanov, V.B., Ponomarev, V.I., Salyuk, A.N., Tishenko, P.Y. and Talley, L.D. (2006) Structure and Dynamics of Synoptic Scale Eddies in the Northern Japan Sea, In: Akulichev, V.A. and Lobanov, V.B., Eds., Far Eastern Seas of Russia. Vol. I, Oceanological Studies, Nauka, Moscow, 450-473.
- 23. Baines, P.G. (1982) Deep Sea Research Part A: Oceanographic Research Papers, 29, 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(82)90098-X
- 24. Kolmogorov, A.N. (1962) Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 13, 82-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062000518
- 25. Isoda, Y., Naganobu, M. and Watanabe, H. (1992) Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Ehime University, 12, 355-365.
- 26. Isoda, Y., Naganobu, M., Watanabe, H. and Nukata, K. (1992) Umi no Kenkyu, 1, 141-151.
- 27. Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1988) Theoretical Physics, Vol. I, Mechanics. 4th Edition, Nauka, Moscow, 1988. (In Russian)
- 28. Avsjuk, Y.N. (1996) Tidal Forces and Natural Processes. UIPE RAS, Moscow. (In Russian)
- 29. Novotryasov, V.V. and Simonenko, S.V. (1989) Izvestiya, Academy of Sciences, USSR, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 25, 327-330.
- 30. Monin, A.S. and Ozmidov, R.V. (1981) Oceanic Turbulence. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad. (In Russian)
- 31. Takematsu, M., Ostrovskii, A. and Nagano, Z. (1999) Journal of Oceanography, 55, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007846114165
- 32. Fu, L. and Holt, B. (1983) Journal of Geophysical Research, 88, 1844-1852. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC03p01844
- 33. Xu, Q., Zheng, Q., Lin, H., Liu, Y., Song, Y.T. and Yuan, Y. (2008) Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 27, 60-69.
- 34. Polzin, K.L. (2008) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38, 2556-2574. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3666.1
- 35. Polzin, K.L. (2010) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40, 789-801.https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4039.1
- 36. Garrett, C.J. and Munk, W. (1972) Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2, 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927208236082
- 37. Garrett, C.J. and Munk, W. (1971) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1971)001<0196:IWSITP>2.0.CO;2
- 38. Simonenko, S.V and Lobanov, V.B. (2012) Dissipative Structure of Turbulence in Mesoscale Eddy. Proceedings of the International conference “Fluxes and Structures in Fluids: Physics of Geospheres”, Vladivostok, 27-30 September 2011, Nauka, Moscow, 106-112.
- 39. Polzin, K.L. (2004) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34, 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0214:AHDOIW>2.0.CO;2
- 40. D’Asaro, E., Lee, C., Rainville, L., Harcourt, R. and Thomas, L. (2011) Science, 332, 318-322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201515
- 41. Nazarenko, S.V. and Schekochihin, A.A. (2011) Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 677, 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211201100067X
- 42. Capet, X., McWilliams, J.C., Molemaker, M.J. and Shchepetkin, A.F. (2008) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3671.1
- 43. Capet, X., McWilliams, J.C., Molemaker, M.J. and Shchepetkin, A.F. (2008) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 38, 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JPO3672.1
- 44. Miropolsky, Y.Z. and Filyushkin, B.N. (1971) Izvestiya, Academy of Sciences, USSR, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 7, 778-797.
- 45. Rodi, W. (1984) Models of Environmental Turbulence. In: Kollman, V., Ed., Prediction Methods for Turbulent Flows, Мir, Мoscow, 227-322. (In Russian)
- 46. Gregg, M.C. (1987) Journal of Physical Oceanography, 92, 5249-5286. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC05p05249
- 47. Monin, A.S. and Yaglom, A.M. (1975) Statistical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. I, Mechanics of Turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- 48. Canuto, V.M., Dubovikov, M.S., Cheng, Y. and Dienstfrey А. (1996) Physics of Fluids, 8, 599-613. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868844
- 49. Itoh, S., Yasuda, I., Nakatsuka, T., Nishioka, J. and Volkov, Y.N. (2010) Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005629
- 50. Akulichev, V.A. (1978) Cavitation in Cryogenic Fluids. Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)
- 51. Akulichev, V.A., Bugaeva, L.K., Morgunov, Y.N. and Solov’ev, A.A. (2011) Doklady Akademii Nauk, 441, 821-824.
- 52. Prigogine, I. and Stengers I. (1984) Order out of Chaos, Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books, Toronto.
- 53. Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. (1989) Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. W.H. Freeman, New York.




