Applied Mathematics
Vol.05 No.15(2014), Article ID:48497,9 pages
10.4236/am.2014.515215
Lecture Notes of Möbuis Transformation in Hyperbolic Plane
Rania B. M. Amer
Department of Engineering Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Email: dr.raniaamer@yahoo.com
Copyright © 2014 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 26 May 2014; revised 2 July 2014; accepted 14 July 2014
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I have provided a brief introduction on Möbius transformation and explored some basic properties of this kind of transformation. For instance, Möbius transformation is classified according to the invariant points. Moreover, we can see that Möbius transformation is hyperbolic isometries that form a group action PSL (2,Â) on the upper half plane model.
Keywords:
The Upper Half-Plane Model, Möbius Transformation, Hyperbolic Distance, Fixed Points, The Group PSL (2,Â)

1. Introduction
Möbius transformations have applications to problems in physics, engineering and mathematics. Furthermore, the conformal mapping is represented as bilinear translation, linear fractional transformation and Mobius transformation.
Möbius transformations are also called homographic transformations, linear fractional transformations, or fractional linear transformations and it is a bijective holomorphic function (conformal map) [1] [2] .
The purpose of this paper is studied the properties of Möbius transformations in detail, and some definitions and theorems are given. The basic properties of these transformations are introduced and classified according to the invariant points. Möbius transformations are formed a group action PSL (2,Â) on the upper half plane model.
A Möbius transformation of the plane is a map f:

(1-1)
which sending each point to a corresponding point, where z is the complex variable and the coefficients a, b, c, d are complex numbers [3] .
Definition (1-1).
The upper half plane model is defined by the set
(1-2)
and the boundary of is defined by
(1-3)
The lines (geodesics) are vertical rays and semicircles orthogonal to ¶H. The angles are Euclidean angles.
Definition (1-2).
A Möbius transformations form a group which is denoted by
.
Remark (1-3).
Since Möbius transformation takes the form

If the point
, this means
so
and we get the following:
1)

2) If c = 0

3) If

Lemma (1-4).
A Möbius transformation consists of four composition functions.
Proof.
The four functions are:
1) translation by

2) inversion and reflection with respect to real axis
then the plane inside turn out and the lines on the plane are lines or circles and right angles stay true and also the circles are circles;
3) dilation and rotation

4) translation by


Remark (1-5).
We can write Möbius transformations as follows

The inverse Möbius transformation is evaluated from the inverse of the metric
then

Theorem (1-6).
Möbius transformations also preserve cross ratio.
Proof.
Given four distinct points z1, z2, z3, z4, their cross ratio is defined by

The cross ratio is invariant of the group of all Möbius transformation so if we transform the four points zi into


Since translation, rotation and dilation preserve cross ratio and Möbius transformation consists of them so Möbius transformation preserves cross ratio.
Corollary (1-7).

If

and therefore

If any one of zi = 0 for example z3 = 0, then

Since the trace of matrix A is tr(A) = a + b and this trace is invariant under conjugation, this is mean,

Every Möbius transformation can be represented by normalized matrix A such that its determinant equal one which mean ad − bc = 1.
Lemma (1-8).
Two Möbius transformations A, B with


Poof.
Let
Since matrix A and B are Möbius transformations, then
Since
If and only if

2. The Fixed Points in Mobius Transformation
A Möbius transformation is
Since fixed points (i.e. invariant points) is defined by f(z) = z, then
This mean

For non parabolic transformation, there are two fixed points 0, ¥ but for parabolic transformation, there is only fixed points ¥ because the fixed points are coincide.
3. The Types of Mobius Transformations
There are Parabolic, elliptic, hyperbolic and loxodromic which are distinguished by looking at the trace tr(A) = a + b.
3.1. For Parabolic Transformations
tr2(A) = 4, the parabolic Möbius transformations forms subgroup isomorphic to the group of matrices


which describes a translation

3.2. For Hyperbolic Transformations


which describes a rotation

3.3. For Elliptic Transformations


which describes a rotation

3.4. For Loxodromic Transformations



which describes a dilation (homothety)

The difference between orientation preserving (invariant) and orientation reversing:
1) Rotation and translation are orientation-preserving.
2) Reflection and glide-reflection are orientation-reversing.
3) A composition of orientation-preserving functions is orientation-preserving.
4) A composition of two orientation-reversing functions is orientation-preserving.
5) A composition of one orientation-preserving function and one orientation-reversing function is orientation- reversing.
6) The determinant of the matrix A = 1 (which mentioned above) then the orientation-preserving but if the determinant of the matrix A = ‒1 then the orientation reversing
7)





8) In Orientation preserving all non collinear points A, B, C, the proper angle measures of the angles ABC and A'B'C' have the same sign but in orientation reversing all non collinear points A, B, C, the proper angle measures of the angles ABC and A'B'C' have opposite signs.
9) Orientation preserving isometries takes counterclockwise angles to counterclockwise angles, and it takes clockwise angles to clockwise angles. An orientation reversing isometries takes counterclockwise angles to clockwise angles, and it takes clockwise angles to counterclockwise angles.
4. Isometries in Mobius Transformation
Definition (4-1).
The group


by Möbius transformations and also the matrices of this group conjugate to the matrix

that


Definition (4-2).
Let

with metric



Remark (4-3).
From this definition the geodesic between two points (x0, y1) and (x0, y2) on the vertical line with y2 > y1 has length ln(y2/y1) but if two points do not lie on a vertical line so the geodesics is circular arc with center on the x-axis as seen in Figure 1.
Remark (4-4).
From the definition (1-1) we can define the isometry of hyperbolic plane

Let a mapping f:



Theorem (4-4).
Möbius transformations act isometries in



Proof.
Möbius transformations preserve distance. A bijective map that preserves distance is called an isometry because an isometry is a transformation which preserves distance. Thus Möbius transformations are isometries of H.
A second proof.
Since the form of Möbius transformations are

Since
Then

From this equation we remark that Möbius transformations preserve the hyperbolic metric so that Möbius transformations are hyperbolic isometries.
A third proof.
From the definition of hyperbolic distance, we want to show that
Since



Figure 1. The plane as boundary of half space model of hyperbolic space.

Let

and from

Since the left hand side is

Since

Then

We get the left hand side equal the right hand side, and then the proof is complete.
Lemma (4-5).
Let Mobius transformations

Proof.
The right hand side


We get the left hand side equal the right hand side, and then the proof is complete.
Remark (4-6).
The group



This action is faithful and







Theorem (4-7).
All orientation-preserving isometries of


Proof.
The isometry group of hyperbolic plane is denoted by






and then, we get:

Let f(z) is an isometry of

Let z1, z2 be two points lie in positive imaginary axis. Let the point z not lie in positive imaginary axis and draw two hyperbolic circles with center z1 and z2 and passing through z, we find these circles intersect in z,



The first case:
If


serving isometries is given by the map

The second case:
If


serving isometries is given by the rotation z → kz and inversion z →−1/z. This means all orientation-preserving isometry of

Theorem (4-8).
Möbius transformations preserve circles and lines (Figure 2).
Proof.
Let the transformation w = 1/z is an inversion and every Möbius transformation (Figure 3) f(z) of the form (1.1) is a composition of finitely many similarities and inversions [6] -[9] .
Since w = u + iv and z = x + iy, then
Figure 2. Circle-preserving maps from the plane to itself.
Figure 3. Möbius transformation is composition of multiple inversions.

From the equation of the circle

But if A = 0, it is a line, if
We can write again the Equation (1-33) w.r.t u, v as follows
If D = 0, it is a line, if
So Möbius transformations preserve circles and lines.
Remark (4-9).
From the last theorem (1-5), we find that the circle goes through the origin may be mapped to the circle or the line.
Theorem (4-10).
Möbius transformations preserve distance.
Proof.
From theorem (1-2) Möbius transformations act isometries in


5. Conclusion
The properties of Möbius transformations are introduced in detail, and some definitions and theorems are given to show that Möbius transformations are one-to-one, onto and conformal mapping. Also, Möbius transformations map circles to circles and also, map the real line to the real line such that the coefficients a, b, c and d are real. Every orientation-preserving isometrics of the hyperbolic plane is Möbius transformations. Every orientation-reversing isometrics of the hyperbolic plane is a composition of Möbius transformations and reflection.



Acknowledgements
I wish to express my gratitude towards to Professor Dr. William M. Goldman, University of Maryland and Distinguished Scholar-Teacher Professor, Department of Mathematics, for his valuable, guidance, patience and support. I consider myself very fortunate for being able to work with a very considerate and encouraging professor like him.
References
- Yilmaz, N. (2009) On Some Mapping Properties of Möbius Transformations. The Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 6, 1-8.
- Nehari, Z. (1952) Conformal Mapping. McGraw-Hill Book, New York.
- John, O. (2010) The Geometry of Möbius Transformations. University of Rochester, Rochester.
- Graeme, K.O. (2012) Random Discrete Groups in the Space of Möbuis Transformations. Msc Thesis, Massey University, Albany.
- Aramayona, J. (2011) Hyperbolic Structures on Surfaces. Lecture Notes Series, IMS, NUS, 9.
- Beardon, A.F. (1995) The Geometry of Discrete Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 91. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Jones, G.A. and Singerman, D. (1987) Complex Functions, an Algebraic and Geometric Viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171915
- Lehner, J. (1964) Discontinuous Groups and Automorphic Functions, Mathematical Surveys, 8. American Mathematical Society, Providence. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/008
- Seppälä, M. and Sorvali, T. (1992) Geometry of Riemann Surfaces and Teichmüller Spaces, Chapter 1. Elsevier Sci- ence Publishing Company, INC, New York, 11-58.
















