Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.04 No.08(2014), Article ID:48977,9 pages
10.4236/apm.2014.48050
Volume of Geodesic Balls in Finsler Manifolds of Hyperbolic Type
Carlos Ogouyandjou
Institut de Mathematiques et de Sciences Physiques (IMSP), Universite d’Abomey-Calavi, Porto-Novo, Republic of Benin
Email: ogouyandjou@imsp-uac.org
Copyright © 2014 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 20 June 2014; revised 20 July 2014; accepted 28 July 2014
ABSTRACT
Let
be a compact Finsler manifold of hyperbolic type, and
be its universal Finslerian covering. In this paper we show that the growth function of the volume of geodesic balls of
is of purely exponential type.
Keywords:
Finsler Manifold, Gromov Hyperbolic Manifold, Critical Exponent, Volume Entropy

1. Introduction and Main Results
A Finsler manifold
is called of hyperbolic type, if there exists on the manifold M a Riemannian metric
of strictly negative curvature such that F and
are uniformly equivalent (cf. Definition 2.3).
We say that a function
is of purely exponential type if there exist constants
and
such that

for some constant
The real number h is called the exponential factor of f. In 1969, Margulis (see [1] ) proved, for suitable constant
that

exists at each point p in manifolds of negative curvature and that the function a is continuous.
Clearly, this result implies purely exponential growth of volume of geodesic spheres. In 1979, Manning introduced a notion of volume entropy
of a compact Riemannian manifold
as follows (see [2] ): if
denotes the volume of the geodesic ball 

where the limit on the right hand side exists for all 
Manning showed that, in the case of non-positive curvature, 
In 1997, using the notions of Busemann density and Patterson Sullivan measure, G. Knieper proved the following result (see [3] ):
If 



Let 

The main result of this paper is the following:
Theorem 1.1. Let 




Theorem 1.1 implies the following Corollary:
Corollary 1.2. Let 





However, from Theorem 1.1, since all compact orientable surfaces of genus greater than one admits a metric 
Corollary 1.3. Let M be a compact orientable surface of genus greater than one, F a Finsler metric on M and 


The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, we recall some basic facts about the volume entropy of a compact Finsler manifold. Section 3 is devoted to the ideal boundary and the Gromov boundary of the universal Finslerian covering of a Finsler manifold of hyperbolic type. In Section 4, we introduce a notion of quasi-convex cocompact group and we provide the proof of the Theorem 1.1.
2. The Volume Entropy of a Finsler Manifold of Hyperbolic Type
In this section, we briefly recall some notions from Finsler geometry; see [5] or [6] and the references therein for more details. Let M be a manifold and denote by 
with the following properties:
1) 


2) 

3) The 
is positive definite at every point of
Note that any Riemannian manifold 


piecewise 









Note that if F is typically positively homogeneous (of degree 1) the distance 
We say that the Finsler structure F is absolute homogeneous is
In this case, the distance 


Fix an arbitrary Riemannian metric g on M and let 




The Finsler form is given by
which is independant of the choice of the Riemannian metric g.
Definition 2.1. Let 

Definition 2.2. Let 
1) A piecewise 



2) A curve 


3) A curve 


4) A curve 


Definition 2.3. Let 

Let 






Let 

Remark 2.4. Note that if M is compact manifold and F is invariant under the deck transformation 
3. Ideal and Gromov Boundaries of Finsler Manifolds of Hyperbolic Type
The following theorem is fundamental for the study of the ideal boundary of Finsler manifolds of hyperbolic type. It was proved by Morse in dimension 2 and by Klingenberg in arbitrary dimensions. The fact that the Morse Lemma also holds in Finsler case was first observed by E. M. Zaustinsky (see [7] ). Due to Klingenberg (see [8] ), the Morse Lemma holds in any dimension.
Theorem 3.1. (Morse Lemma, cf. [9] ) Let 


1) for any two points x and


2) If 

These properties stay hold for F-backward rays and F-minimal geodesics.
Now let 
















is bijective. Then f defines on 



Let recall now some basic facts about Gromov hyperbolic spaces. Let 

Let


for all x, y, z and every choice of reference point x0. We call X a Gromov hyperbolic space if it is a δ-hyperbolic space for some





Lemma 3.2. (see [11] or [12] ) Let 
for every geodesic segment 
Definition 3.3. A function 


Proposition 3.4. (see [11] or [12] ) Let 

is 4δ-convex.
Definition 3.5. Let 




In a metric space X, a quasi-geodesic (resp. quasi-geodesic ray) is a quasi-isometric map 

Lemma 3.6. (see [11] ) Let 



Now let X be a Gromov hyperbolic manifold, 

If 
Then the definition of the sequence that converges at infinity does not depend on the choice of the reference point. Let us recall the following equivalence relation 
The Gromov boundary 
Let X be a simply connected manifold which is a Gromov hyperbolic space. One defines on the set 
1) if

2) if 


3) For 

where
for x and y elements of
The set of all 



Lemma 3.7. (see [13] ) Let X be a δ-hyperbolic space. Then
1) Each geodesic 

2) For each







Definition 3.8. Let 


is well-defined on X and is called the Busemann function for the geodesic c.
Lemma 3.9. (see [13] ) Let X be a δ-hyperbolic space, 





where 
Lemma 3.10. (see [11] ) Let 



is bounded above, 

The following lemma give an homeomorphism between the ideal boundary and the Gromov hyperbolic boundary of Hadamard manifolds:
Lemma 3.11. (see [14] ) Let X0 be a Hadamard manifold with sectional curvature 

In particular,
Using Morse Lemma, (see Lemma 3.11) and the properties of the ideal boundaries, we obtain the following lemma:
Lemma 3.12. Let 



Proof. Since 







4. The Growth Rate of the Volume of Balls in Finsler Manifolds of Hyperbolic Type
Definition 4.1. Let X be a Gromov hyperbolic manifold with reference point 







Definition 4.2. Let 




denotes the Poincaré series associated to
is called the critical exponent of 




Lemma 4.3. (see [15] ) Let 


and the modified series
converges for 

Let now 





Let 



The fact that M is compact implies the existence of a constant 
Then, the critical exponent 


Lemma 4.4. Let 



1)
2) 


3) 

4)
Proof of Lemma 4.4.
1) Direct because 

2) Let


3) For all



For all
Hence,
then
4) Let g0 denotes a metric of strictly negative curvature on M. The universal Riemannian covering 



(see [3] ). Since 





that









Let now 





The gromov hull 




Definition 4.5. A non trivial subgroup 


The following lemma is due to Coornaert (see [13] ).
Lemma 4.6. Let 






for all
Proof of Theorem 1.1. By Lemma 4.4, we have





For an orbit 



Let 


Let now 




and for
Then,
By Lemma 4.6, there is a constant 
for all 




Cite this paper
CarlosOgouyandjou, (2014) Volume of Geodesic Balls in Finsler Manifolds of Hyperbolic Type. Advances in Pure Mathematics,04,391-399. doi: 10.4236/apm.2014.48050
References
- 1. Margulis, M.A. (1969) Applications of Ergotic Theory to the Investigation of Manifolds of Negative Curvature. Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 3, 335-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01076325
- 2. Manning, A. (1979) Topological Entropy for Geodesic Flows. Annals of Mathematics, 110, 567-573.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1971239 - 3. Knieper, G. (2002) Hyperbolic Dynamics and Riemannian Geometry. In: Hasselblatt, B. and Katok, A., Eds., Handbook of Dynamical Systems 1A, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 453-545.
- 4. Ezin, J.-P. and Ogouyandjou, C. (2005) The Growth Function of the Volume of Geodesic Balls in Riemannian Manifolds of Hyperbolic Type. IMHOTEP, 6, 9-17.
- 5. Bao, D., Chern, S.-S. and Shen, Z. (2000) An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 200. Communication in Contemporay Math, No. 4, Springer-Verlag, 511-533.
- 6. Shen, Z. (1977) Volume Comparison and Its Applications in Riemann-Finsler Geometry. Advances in Mathematics, 128, 306-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/aima.1997.1630
- 7. Zaustinsky, E.M. (1962) Extremals on Compact E-Surfaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 102, 433-445.
- 8. Klingenberg, W. (1971) Geodatischer Fluss auf Mannigfaltigkeiten vom hyperbolishen Typ. Inventiones Mathematicae, 14, 63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01418743
- 9. Schroder, J.P. (2014) Minimal Rays on Surfaces of Genus Greater than One. arXiv:1404.0573v1 [math.DS]
- 10. Ancona, A. (1988) Théorie du potentiel sur les graphes et les varieties. In: Ancona, A., et al., Eds., Potential Theory, Surveys and Problems, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 1344, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
- 11. Coornaert, M., Delzant, T. and Papadopoulos, A. (1990) Géométrie et théorie des groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. No. 1441, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
- 12. Coornert, M. and Papadoupoulos, A. (1993) Symbolic Dynamics and Hyperbolic Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 1539, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
- 13. Coornaert, M. (1993) Mesures de Patterson-Sullivan sur le bord d’un espace hyperbolique au sens de Gromov. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 159, 241-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1993.159.241
- 14. Cao, J. (2000) Cheeger Isoperimetric Constants of Gromov Hyperbolic Spaces with Quasi-Pole. Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 2, 511-533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219199700000232 - 15. Patterson, S. (1976) The Limit Set of Fuchsian Group. Acta Mathematica, 163, 241-273.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02392046

























































