Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Vol.05 No.11(2015), Article ID:59731,7 pages
10.4236/ojog.2015.511085

Screenning of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Women Attending Outpatient Clinic of Infertility

Heloisa Lopes Lavorato1, Natália Prearo Moço1, Laura Fernandes Martin1, Ana Gabriela Pontes Santos2, Anaglória Pontes2, Marli Teresinha Cassamassimo Duarte3, Márcia Guimarães da Silva1*

1Department of Pathology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil

2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil

3Department of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil

Email: *mgsilva@fmb.unesp.br

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 5 August 2015; accepted 15 September 2015; published 18 September 2015

ABSTRACT

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. trachomatis in women diagnosed with infertility attending the Outpatient Clinic of Infertility from Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Brazil. Patients and Methods: This molecular study enrolled a total of 112 women. Among these patients, 62 presented primary infertility while 50 presented secondary infertility. The criteria for eligibility included women who were: reproductive-aged; no prior report of seroconversion for HIV; no antibiotic or vaginal cream used in the preceding 30 days; and abstinence from sexual intercourse for 72 hours before the visit. The women were submitted to a gynecological examination and cervical samples were collected with an endocervical cytobrush for molecular analysis of C. trachomatis. Results: The prevalence of chlamydial infection was 8% with similar prevalence between primary (8.1%) and secondary (8.0%) infertility. Conclusion: Considering the asymptomatic nature of chlamydial infection and its association with tubal factor infertility, there is a pressing need to incorporate the screening of C. trachomatis infection as part of the routine investigation for infertility. The early diagnostic by screening can minimize complications and reduce Public Health costs with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Keywords:

Chlamydial Infection, Infertility, Molecular Diagnosis

1. Introduction

Infertility is a worldwide health problem among couples with approximately 15% current global infertility rate, translating to one in 6 couples suffering from this condition. Infertility is defined as the inability of sexually active couples taking no contraceptives to achieve pregnancy within 1 year. Primary infertility is used to describe a couple that has never been able to conceive a pregnancy, while secondary infertility is used to describe the inability to become pregnant following the birth of one or more biological children [1] .

According to the World Health Organization, the etiology of infertility is multifactorial, including female, male and combined male and female factors and in some cases without known etiology. A study carried out with 8500 infertility couples shows that 37% are due to female factor, 8% due to male factor, and 35% due to combined male and female factor infertility. The most common identifiable factors associated with female infertility are ovulatory disorders (25%) and tubal pathologies (22%), followed by endometriosis (15%), pelvic adhesions (11%), and hyperprolactinemia (7%) [2] .

The tubal factor infertility (TFI) is often caused by previous episode of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) which is a polymicrobial infection of the upper genital tract. The diagnosis of PID is based primarily on clinical evaluation and the principal symptoms are lower abdominal or pelvic pain and cervical motion or pelvic tenderness [3] . Tubal tissue damage occurs when acute PID progresses into a chronic form of the disease resulting in scarifications and adhesions in the fallopian tubes [4] -[6] . The relative risk for TFI after a single episode of PID is approximately 10% and this risk doubles after each recurrent episode [6] .

Sexually transmitted infections (STI) are often considered the leading preventable cause of infertility worldwide because they are responsible for most cases of PID [7] -[9] . Chlamydial infection, caused by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, is one of most frequently reported STI [2] .

C. trachomatis, an obligate intracellular human pathogen, is a Gram-negative bacterium with a circular genome of 1042 kbp [10] [11] . It can appear as either spherical or ovoid shape [9] . Life cycle of C. trachomatis is composed by two distinct stages named elementary body (EB) and reticulates body (RB). The EB is the extracellular and infectious form while RB is the intracellular, noninfectious and metabolically active form [8] [12] [13] .

According to the World Health Organization in 2008, the total number of new cases of C. trachomatis in adults was 105.7 million worldwide. The prevalence of C. trachomatis in women between 15 - 49 years in Americas was 7.6%, as well as 2.6% in Africa, 1.1% in South-East Asia and 3.9% in Europe [2] . Chlamydial infection is asymptomatic in the most cases and delay in its diagnostic may cause several harmful effects mainly in women [14] -[18] .

Treatment of PID and TFI engender elevated financial and psychological costs. Screening programmes for chlamydial infection have been implemented in order to decrease these costs. The major aims of C. trachomatis screening are to reduce morbidity by early detection and treatment of lower genital tract infection as well as to decrease prevalence of this infection and consequently reduce their transmission [19] . Randomized controlled trial conducted in the USA demonstrated that selective C. trachomatis screening reduced the incidence of PID by 56% after 1 year of follow up [20] . In addition, for every 83 women screened, one case of PID is prevented [21] . Moreover, several studies suggest that screening of this infection becomes cost-effective at prevalence of 2% - 10% [22] -[25] .

Several studies have been shown the association between chlamydial infection and TFI [26] -[30] . The prevalence of C. trachomatis in infertile women ranges from 3.9% to 32% worldwide [26] -[28] [31] -[39] . The discrepancy between these results could be attributed to differences in the sampling, methodology and type of biological sample [9] [40] [41] .

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of C. trachomatis in women diagnosed with primary and secondary infertility attending the Outpatient Clinic of Infertility from Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Brazil.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This molecular study enrolled a total of 112 women attended the Outpatient Clinic of Infertility of Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. All women that received assistance in this outpatient between July 2008 and June 2009 were included. Among these patients, 62 presented primary infertility while 50 presented secondary infertility. The criteria for eligibility included women who were: reproductive aged; no prior report of seroconversion for HIV; no antibiotic or vaginal cream used in the preceding 30 days; and abstinence from sexual intercourse for 72 hours before the visit. (Sociodemographic and gynecology characterization of the study groups were performed by interview from of all the women enrolled. Following the interview, the women were submitted to a gynecological examination.

The Human Research Ethics Committee of the institution approved the study and all patients provided written informed consent before enrollment.

2.2. Sample Collection

After inserting a non-lubricated speculum, cervical samples were collected with an endocervical cytobrush for molecular analysis of C. trachomatis by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Endocervical samples were inserted in 1 mL of Tris-EDTA-Tween solution that was stored at −20˚C until analysis.

2.3. Detection of C. trachomatis

For the evaluation of C. trachomatis infection by PCR, DNA extraction was performed with a previous digestion with proteinase K. The presence and integrity of DNA samples was confirmed by the amplification of beta-globin constitutive gene using primers GH20 (GAA GAG CCA AGG ACA GGT AC) and PCO4 (CAA CTT CAT CCA CGT TCA CC) which results in amplification of a 268 bp sequence. C. trachomatis was detected by the amplification of a 201 bp sequence by PCR, using Taq DNA Polimerase (Platinum, Invitrogen®) and primers CTP1 (TAG TAA CTG CCA CTT CAT CA) and CTP2 (TTC CCC TTG TAA TTC GTT GC) (Fig. 1B) [42] . Amplification parameters consisted in 39 cycles of 1 min at 95˚C, 1 min at 55˚C and 30 s at 72˚C. In all reactions, negative and positive controls were run simultaneously, with respectively sterile water and CT DNA extracted from infected McCoy cells. Amplicon molecular weight was determined by comparing to a standard size marker, under UV transilumination.

2.4. Data Analysis and Statistics

Sociodemographic data and sexual history from patients included in this study were presented in percentage while gynecologic data was presented as percentage and median followed interquartile range. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the primary and secondary infertility groups was compared using Qui-square test (Sigma Stat 3.1).

3. Results

The sociodemographic and gynecologic characteristics and sexual history of the women included in the study are showed in Table 1.

The median of patient age, menarche and first sexual intercourse was 28 (14 - 44), 12 (9 - 17) and 16 (11 - 38) years, respectively. The median of fertility duration was 4 (1 - 17) years.

The prevalence of chlamydial infection was 8% (9/112). Among infertile women with positive chlamydial infection, pelvic pain was reported by 22.2% (2/9) patients, while dyspareunia, and previous treatment for lower genital tract infection was reported by 44.4% (4/9), and 77.7% (7/9), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the chlamydial infection prevalence between primary (5/62) and secondary (4/50) infertility (p = 0.736). Regarding secondary infertility, 50% (2/4) of patients with chlamydial infection have presented previous miscarriage.

4. Discussion

C. trachomatis is one of the most common worldwide-distributed bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Ac-

Table 1. Sociodemographic and gynecologic characteristics and sexual history of the women included in the study.

cording to a study published by the World Health Organization in 2012, the number of new cases of chlamydial infection has been estimated globally to be 105.7 million in 2008. Although the high incidence of this infection, the real prevalence is difficult to estimate without a screening as the most cases are asymptomatic [16] -[18] .

The prevalence of chlamydial infection in infertile women in this study was 8%. Similar prevalence was found in studies carried out in Oman (5.5%) [43] , Central Saudi Arabia (8%) [26] , Poland (8.7%) [44] , Nigeria (9.6%) [35] and Brazil (10% and 10.9%) [39] [45] . However, higher prevalence was found by others studies carried out in Saudi Arabia (15%) [28] , UK (16%) [36] , India (28.1%) [46] and Iran (32%) [34] . Different prevalence around the world showed in these studies could be explained by the methodology employed, type of biological sample collected and population studied [9] [40] [41] .

Our prevalence rate of C. trachomatis in endocervical samples from infertile women was obtained by conventional PCR. This high prevalence was expected due to characteristics of included women. Several studies reported that sexual behaviors such as early age of first intercourse and multiple partners are most common risk factors for this infection [47] -[50] . Alfarray et al. [26] , using the same sample and the same methodology, found 8% of C. trachomatis in infertile women in Saudi Arabia. Similarly, in another study carried out in Brazil, Marques et al. [45] showed 10% of C. trachomatis in endocervical sample from women attended in Outpatient Clinic of Sterility using conventional PCR.

Traditionally chlamydial infection had been diagnosed by culture and rapid antigen detection methods. These methodologies had several limitations which included low sensitivity, long testing time and high cost [9] [51] [52] . Cell culture methods for C. trachomatis have a high specificity however the sensibility can range between 60% - 80%. Additionally, culture methods are difficult to be standardized and technically demanding [51] [52] . Rapid antigen-based testing such as direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) and enzyme immune assay (EIA) also have high specificity [53] [54] but DFA requires expertise in microscopic examination and interpretation of results [9] [51] [55] while the sensibility of EIA tests can vary between 60 - 96 per cent [54] [56] . The development of tests based on nucleic acid amplification technology (NAAT) led to the improvement of sensitivity for C. trachomatis diagnostics. The most widely employed NAAT is polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which is at least 20 - 30 per cent more sensitive and 100 per cent specific due to the ability to detect as little as a single copy of the gene [57] -[61] .

Spread of C. trachomatis from endocervix to female upper genital tract causes PID. Tubal tissue damage resulting from previous episodes of PID leads to tubal blockage and consequently to TFI [7] -[9] [41] . According to Price et al., a single episode of C. trachomatis has a 16% of probability to result in PID [62] . Moreover, Wiesenfeld et al. [63] showed that women diagnosed with subclinic PID have a 40% reduced incidence of pregnancy.

A limitation of the present study is that it is restricted to 112 women attending the Outpatient Clinic of Infertility of Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil and who rely on the public health system exclusively. Thus, these data on chlamydial infection prevalence might not be generalizable to all Brazilian women with infertility.

Given the asymptomatic nature of chlamydial infection and its association with tubal factor infertility, there is a pressing need to incorporate the screening of C. trachomatis infection as part of the routine investigation for infertility. The early diagnostic by screening can minimize complications and reduce Public Health costs with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Cite this paper

Heloisa LopesLavorato,Natália PrearoMoço,Laura FernandesMartin,Ana Gabriela PontesSantos,AnaglóriaPontes,Marli Teresinha CassamassimoDuarte,Márcia Guimarães daSilva, (2015) Screenning of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Women Attending Outpatient Clinic of Infertility. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,05,600-607. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2015.511085

References

  1. 1. Berek, J. (2002) Novak’s Gynecology. 13th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 973.

  2. 2. WHO (2012) Global Incidence and Prevalence of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections—2008. World Health Organization, Geneva.

  3. 3. Gradison, M. (2012) Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. American Family Physician, 85, 791-796.

  4. 4. Mardh, P.A. (2004) Tubal Factor Infertility, with Special Regard to Chlamydial Salpingitis. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 17, 49-52.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001432-200402000-00010

  5. 5. Schindlbeck, C., Dziura, D. and Mylonas, I. (2014) Diagnosis of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID): Intra-Operative Findings and Comparison of Vaginal and Intra-Abdominal Cultures. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 289, 1263-1269.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3150-7

  6. 6. Westrom, L.V. (1994) Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Infertility. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 21, S32-S37.

  7. 7. Paavonen, J. and Eggert Kruse, W. (1999) Chlamydia trachomatis: Impact on Human Reproduction. Human Reproduction Update, 5, 433-437.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.5.433

  8. 8. Manavi, K. (2006) A Review on Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 20, 941-951.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.003

  9. 9. Malhotra, M., Sood, S., Mukherjee, A., Muralidhar, S. and Bala, M. (2013) Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: An Update. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 138, 303-316.

  10. 10. Stephens, R.S., Kalman, S., Lammel, C., Fan, J., Marathe, R., Aravind, L., Mitchell, W., Olinger, L., Tatusov, R.L., Zhao, Q., Koonin, E.V. and Davis, R.W. (1998) Genome Sequence of an Obligate Intracellular Pathogen of Humans. Chlamydia trachomatis. Science, 282, 754-759.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.754

  11. 11. Mishori, R., McClaskey, E.L. and Winklerprins, V.J. (2012) Chlamydia trachomatis Infections: Screening, Diagnosis, and Management. American Family Physician, 86, 1127-1132.

  12. 12. Moulder, J.W. (1991) Interaction of Chlamydiae and Host Cells in Vitro. Microbiological Reviews, 55, 143-190.

  13. 13. Bavoil, P.M., Hsia, R. and Ojcius, D.M. (2000) Closing in on Chlamydia and Its Intracellular Bag of Tricks. Microbiology, 146, 2723-2731.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-11-2723

  14. 14. van de Laar, M.J. and Morré, S.A. (2007) Chlamydia: A Major Challenge for Public Health. Eurosurveillance, 12, E1-E2.

  15. 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance.
    http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats08/

  16. 16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention C (2009) Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2008 Supplement. Chlamydia Prevalence Monitoring Project Annual Report 2007. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.

  17. 17. Andersen, B., Olesen, F., Moller, J.K. and Ostergaard, L. (2002) Population-Based Strategies for Outreach Screening of Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 185, 252-258.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/338268

  18. 18. Stamm, W.E. (1999) Chlamydia trachomatis: Progress and Problems. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 179, S380-S383.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/513844

  19. 19. Land, J.A., Van Bergen, J.E., Morré, S.A. and Postma, M.J. (2010) Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women and the Cost-Effectiveness of Screening. Human Reproduction Update, 16, 189-204.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp035

  20. 20. Scholes, D., Stergachis, A., Heidrich, F.E., Andrilla, H., Holmes, K.K. and Stamm, W.E. (1996) Prevention of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease by Screening for Chlamydia Infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 1362-1367.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199605233342103

  21. 21. Egger, M., Low, N., Smith, G.D., Lindblom, B. and Herrmann, B. (1998) Screening for Chlamydial Infections and the Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy in a County in Sweden: Ecological Analysis. BMJ, 316, 1776-1780.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1776

  22. 22. Marrazzo, J.M., Celum, C.L., Hillis, S.D., Fine, D., De Lisle, S. and Handsfield, H.H. (1997) Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Selective Screening Criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women. Implications for a National Chlamydia Control Strategy. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 24, 131-141.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007435-199703000-00003

  23. 23. Paavonen, J., Puolakkainen, M., Paukku, M. and Sintonen, H. (1998) Cost-Benefit Analysis of First-Void Urine Chlamydia trachomatis Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 92, 292-298.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00167-7

  24. 24. Genc, M. and Mardh, A. (1996) A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening and Treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 124, 1-7.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_Part_1-199601010-00001

  25. 25. Nettleman, M.D. and Jones, R.B. (1988) Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Women at Moderate Risk for Genital Infections Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. JAMA, 260, 207-213.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410020073031

  26. 26. Alfarraj, D.A., Somily, A.M., Alssum, R.M., Abotalib, Z.M., El-Sayed, A.A. and Al-Mandeel, H.H. (2015) The Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Saudi Women Attending the Infertility Clinic in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 36, 61-66.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.9967

  27. 27. Rashidi, B.H., Chamani-Tabriz, L., Haghollahi, F., Jeddi-Tehrani, M., Naghizadeh, M.M., Shariat, M., Akhondi, M.M., Bagheri, R., Asgari, S. and Wylie, K. (2013) Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection on Fertility; A Case-Control Study. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 14, 67-72.

  28. 28. Kamel, R.M. (2013) Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Infertile Women in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Women’s Health, 5, 277-284.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S46678

  29. 29. Darville, T. and Hiltke, T.J. (2010) Pathogenesis of Genital Tract Disease Due to Chlamydia trachomatis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 201, S114-S125.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/652397

  30. 30. Ray, K. (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis and Infertility. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 123, 730-734.

  31. 31. Dhawan, B., Rawre, J., Ghosh, A., Malhotra, N., Ahmed, M.M., Sreenivas, V. and Chaudhry, R. (2014) Diagnostic Efficacy of a Real Time PCR Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Infertile Women in North India. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 140, 252-261.

  32. 32. Pantoja, M., Campos, E.A., Pitta Dda, R., Gabiatti, J.E., Bahamondes, M.V. and Fernandes, A.M. (2012) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Women Candidates for in Vitro Fertilization at a Public Institution of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 34, 425-431.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032012000900007

  33. 33. Ness, R.B., Soper, D.E., Richter, H.E., Randall, H., Peipert, J.F., Nelson, D.B., Schubeck, D., McNeeley, S.G., Trout, W., Bass, D.C., Hutchison, K., Kip, K. and Brunham, R.C. (2008) Chlamydia Antibodies, Chlamydia Heat Shock Protein and Adverse Sequelae after Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: The PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 129-135.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181557c25

  34. 34. Marashi, S.M.A., Moulana, Z., Fooladi, A.A.I. and Karim, M.M. (2014) Comparison of Genital C. Trachomatis Infection Incidence between Women with Infertility and Healthy Women in Iran Using PCR and Immunofluorescence Methods. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, 7, 1-4.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/jjm.9450

  35. 35. Nwankwo, E.O. and Sadiq, M.N. (2014) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Patients Attending Infertility and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic (STD) in Kano, North Western Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 14, 672-678.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v14i3.24

  36. 36. Pimenta, J., Catchpole, M., Gray, M., Hopwood, J. and Randall, S. (2000) Screening for Genital Chlamydial Infection. BMJ, 321, 629-631.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7261.629

  37. 37. Al-Ramahi, M., Mahafzah, A., Saleh, S. and Fram, K. (2008) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Infertile Women at a University Hospital in Jordan. Eastern Mediterranean Health, 14, 1148-1154.

  38. 38. Afrakhteh, M., Beyhaghi, H., Moradi, A., Hosseini, S.J., Mahdavi, A., Giti, S., et al. (2008) Sexually Transmitted Infections in Tehran. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 2, 123-128.

  39. 39. Fernandes, L.B., Arruda, J.T., Approbato, M.S. and Garcia-Zapata, M.T. (2014) Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea Infection: Factors Associated with Infertility in Women Treated at a Human Reproduction Public Service. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 36, 353-358.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320140005009

  40. 40. Taylor-Robinson, D. and Thomas, B.J. (1991) Laboratory Techniques for the Diagnosis of Chlamydial Infections. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 67, 256-266.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.67.3.256

  41. 41. Ljubin-Sternak, S. and Mestrovic, T. (2014) Chlamydia trachomatis and Genital Mycoplasmas: Pathogens with an Impact on Human Reproductive Health. Journal of Pathogens, 2014, Article ID: 183167.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/183167

  42. 42. Griffais, R. and Thibon, M. (1989) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Polimerase Chain Reaction. Research in Microbiology, 140, 139-141.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0923-2508(89)90047-8

  43. 43. Al Subhi, T., Al Jashnmi, R.N., Al Khaduri, M. and Gowri, V. (2013) Prevalence of Tubal Obstruction in the Hysterosalpingogram of Women with Primary and Secondary Infertility. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 14, 214-216.

  44. 44. Wilkowska-Trojniel, M., Zdrodowska-Stefanow, B., Ostaszewska-Puchalska, I., Zbucka, M., Wolczyński, S., Grygoruk, C., Kuczyński, W. and Zdrodowski, M. (2009) Chlamydia trachomatis Urogenital Infection in Women with Infertility. Advances in Medical Sciences, 54, 82-85.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10039-009-0007-6

  45. 45. Marques, C.A.S., Menezes, M.L.B., Coelho, I.M.G., Marques, C.R.C., Celestino, L.C., Melo, M.C. and Lima, P.R. (2007) Infeccao genital por Chlamydia trachomatis em casais atendidos em ambulatório de esterilidade conjugal. Jornal brasileiro de doencas sexualmente transmissíveis, 19, 5-10.

  46. 46. Malik, A., Jain, S., Hakim, S., Shukla, I. and Rizvi, M. (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis Infection & Female Infertility. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 123, 770-775.

  47. 47. Lappa, S. and Moscicki, A.B. (1997) The Pediatrician and the Sexually Active Adolescent: A Primer for Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 44, 1405-1445.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70567-8

  48. 48. Araújo, R.S., Guimaraes, E.M., Alves, M.F., Sakurai, E., Domingos, L.T., Fioravante, F.C. and Machado, A.C. (2006) Prevalence and Risk Factors for Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in Adolescent Females and Young Women in Central Brazil. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 25, 397-400.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0142-y

  49. 49. Saxena, S.B. and Jenkins, R.R. (1997) Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Adolescents: Screening and Treatment. Comprehensive Therapy, 23, 108-115.

  50. 50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2001) Surveillance 2001: Special Focus Profiles: STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, 51-58.

  51. 51. Black, C.M. (1997) Current Methods of Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 10, 160-184.

  52. 52. Watson, E.J., Templeton, A., Russell, I., Paavonen, J., Mardh, P.A., Stary, A. and Pederson, B.S. (2002) The Accuracy and Efficacy of Screening Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 51, 1021-1031.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-51-12-1021

  53. 53. Thejls, H., Gnarpe, J. and Gnarpe, H. (1994) Expanded Gold Standard in the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a Low Prevalence Population: Diagnostic Efficacy of Tissue Culture, Direct Immunofluorescence, Enzyme Immunoassay, PCR and Serology. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 70, 300-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.70.5.300

  54. 54. Jalgaonkar, S.V., Pathak, A.A. and Thakur, Y.S. (1990) Enzyme Immunoassay for Rapid Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urogenital Infections. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1, 23-26.

  55. 55. Schachter, J., Stamm, W.E. and Quinn, T.C. (1996) Discrepant Analysis and Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. The Lancet, 348, 1308-1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65783-2

  56. 56. Mylonas, I. (2012) Female Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: Where Are We Heading? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 285, 1271-1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2240-7

  57. 57. Mahony, J.B., Luinstra, K.E., Sellors, J.W. and Chernesky, M.A. (1993) Comparison of Plasmid- and Chromosome-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 31, 1753-1758.

  58. 58. Schachter, J., Hook, W.E., Martin, D.H., Willis, W., Fine, P., Fuller, D., Jordan, J., Janda, W.M. and Chernesky, M. (2005) Confirming Positive Results of Nucleic Acid Amlification Tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: All NAATs Are Not Created Equal. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 43, 1372-1373.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.3.1372-1373.2005

  59. 59. Mushanski, L.M., Brandt, K., Coffin, N., Levett, P.N., Horsman, G.B. and Rank, E.L. (2012) Comparison of the BD Viper System with XTR Technology to the GenProbe APTIMA COMBO 2 Assay Using the TIGRIS DTS System for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 39, 514-517.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31824f2f5b

  60. 60. Van Der Pol, B., Liesenfeld, O., Williams, J.A., Taylor, S.N., Lillis, R.A., Body, B.A., Nye, M., Eisenhut, C. and Hook, E.W. (2012) Performance of the Cobas CT/NG Test Compared to the Aptima AC2 and Viper CTQ/GCQ Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 50, 2244-2249.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.06481-11

  61. 61. Stamm, W.E., Jones, R.B. and Batteiger, B.E. (2005) Chlamydia trachomatis (Trachoma, Perinatal Infections, Lymphogranuloma Venereum and Other Genital Infections). In: Mandell, G.L., Dolin, R., Bennette, J.E., Eds., Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, 2239-2251.

  62. 62. Price, M.J., Ades, A.E., De Angelis, D., Welton, N.J., Macleod, J., Soldan, K., Simms, I., Turner, K. and Horner, P.J. (2013) Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Following Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: Analysis of Prospective Studies with a Multistate Model. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178, 484-492.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws583

  63. 63. Wiesenfeld, H.C., Hillier, S.L., Meyn, L.A., Amortegui, A.J. and Sweet, R.L. (2012) Subclinical Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Infertility. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 120, 37-43.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825a6bc9

NOTES

*Corresponding author.