A. GERSTNEROVÁ
52
ing the two-month period on a basis of two types of analyses:
quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative analysis evaluated the
frequency and the thematic focus of published articles regard-
ing Africa (i.e. identified articled were regrouped according to
the subject treated in up to 22 thematic categories)9, while the
qualitative analysis assessed a content of the selected articles
according to what image of Africa they are giving (1), whether
they tend to enhance xenophobic attitudes within the majority
and if so, to what extent (2), and whether they promote inter-
cultural understanding among communities and if so, to what
extent (3):
1) What image of Africa they are presenting
Point (–1) obtained an article presenting negative image of
Africa (i.e. articles dealing with poverty, civil and ethnical
conflicts or distress of illegal immigrants heading Europe). 1
point obtained an article presenting positive image of Africa
(articles dealing with the richness of African culture, its natural
beauty, and hospitality of African inhabitants). 2 points ob-
tained an article that enriched the positive aspect of Africa by
its further dimension regarding the importance of intercultural
dialogue (i.e. articles described the atmosphere of various so-
cio-cultural events attended by representatives of the African
diaspora and the mainstream society). Finally, when it was not
possible to determine whether the article describe Africa in a
negative or positive way, it received 0.
2) Does the article tend to enhance xenophobic attitudes
within the majority ?
0 obtained an article, in which it was not possible to clearly
determine an eventual effect on the increase of xenophobic
attitudes against immigrants within a major society. By contrast,
1 point obtained an article that expressed concerns of the
Czech/British/French/Belgian population against immigrants
(for example that African immigrants could transmit contagious
diseases or could be a threat for nationals on the local labour
market).
3) Does the article promote intercultural understanding
among communities?
0 was awarded to an article dealing with Africa but disre-
garding the importance of intercultural dialogue among various
communities. 1 point obtained an article which indirectly su-
pported the intercultural understanding (for example by quoting
experience of African immigrants living in the host society).
And the maximum number of points (2 points) received an
article that strengthened the importance of intercultural active-
ties between African diaspora and a major society.
Each article of the selected newspaper obtained relevant
number of points (on a basis of the analysis of the three afore-
mentioned criteria), which became the basic input for the cal-
culation of the average value for each criterion (with the help of
a computer program StatView). Calculation of the average
value for each of the selected criterion facilitated the interpreta-
tion of the effects of published articles (in selected French,
British, Belgian, and Czech newspapers) regarding Africa on
readers.
Analysis of the Czech and European Newspapers –
Comparison of Research Results
The most of the Africa-related articles (of all examined Eu-
ropean newspapers) were published in the Belgian newspaper
Metro (Belgian Metro published 146 articles/2 months), then in
the French newspaper Le Monde (French Le Monde published
122 articles/2 months) and in the British paper The Guardian
(The Guardian published 86 articles/2 months). The Belgian
Metro published almost the same number of Africa-related
articles as it had been published in the four Czech papers alto-
gether within a period of two months (as a whole four Czech
newspapers published 163 Africa-related articles within 2
months). Figure 9 shows the number of published articles about
Africa in selected European newspapers over the two months
period.
In general, the European newspapers tend to present negative
rather than positive image of Africa (this fact was revealed by
the analysis of the first criterion, see Table 2). The most nega-
tive image of Africa during the two month’s press analysis was
imposed by French newspapers (see Table 2). Selected French
newspapers were primarily discussing a dismal political situa-
tion of the former French colonies situated in Sub-Saharan
Africa. On the other hand, the most positive image of Africa
was provided during the two months period by the Czech
newspapers (especially due to a very low number of published
articles in comparison with other analysed European newspa-
pers). Mostly discussed Africa-related topic in selected news-
papers (MF Dnes, Lidové noviny, Týden, 24 hodin; Le Figaro,
Le Monde, Metro France; The Sun, The Guardian, Metro Great
Britain; La Meuse, Le Vif, Metro Belgium) was an African
immigration to Europe, development issues as well as humani-
tarian assistance in Africa. French/British/Belgian newspapers
– on the contrary to the Czech newspapers – did not hesitate to
publish articles on topics that remain taboo in the Czech Re-
public (i.e. articles on global warming and the development of
the Sub-Saharan countries). The articles related to global war-
ming were quite frequently discussed in British newspapers
while articles referring to the development of the Sub-Saharan
countries were mostly discussed in French newspapers. More-
over, West European periodicals dealt more intensively with a
socioeconomic discrimination of Sub-Saharan immigrants in a
host society than did the Czech newspapers. Such a visibility of
the problematic aspects related to the integration process of
African communities in West European newspapers was pro-
bably provoked by the fact that the number of Sub-Saharan
Africans residing in Britain, France and Belgium is much
higher than it is the case in the Czech Republic.
Xenophobic sentiments towards Sub-Saharan Africans (this
fact was revealed by the analysis of the second criterion, see
Table 2) were mainly supported by the British newspaper – The
Sun. The Sun, while describing economic or violent crimes, did
not hesitate to reveal the whole identity of accused but not yet
convicted individuals (in most cases of immigrants of African
and Jamaican origin). Analysis of other selected newspapers
was from this point of view statistically insignificant (see Table
2). A reader could find only solitary articles that might have
had xenophobic effects on members of mainstream society.
One of the most outrageous xenophobic statements addressing
Sub-Saharan Africans was published by the French newspaper
91) Culture, 2 ) Society, 3) Religion, 4) History, 5) Discoveries, 6) Travell i ng
7) Sport, 8) Nature, 9) Economy, 10) Demography, 11) Politics, 12) Devel-
opment and humanitarian aid, 13) Immigration, 14) Infringement of human
rights and democratic values, 15) Armed conflicts, 16) Terrorism, 17)
Defamation of African continent, 18) Deceases, 19) Accidents and natural
disasters, 20) Discrimination, 21) Global warming, and 22) Delinquency o
immigrants in a host society.