Open Journal of Forestry
2014. Vol.4, No.1, 14-23
Published Online January 2014 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojf) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2014.41003
OPEN ACCESS
14
The Effectiveness of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation and
Bio-Compost Addition for Enhancing Reforestation with Argania
spinosa in Morocco
Said El Mrabet1,3*, Lahcen Ouahmane2, Abdelhamid El Mousadik3,
Fouad Msanda3, Younes Abbas4
1Regional Department of Forestry and Combating Desertification, Agadir, Morocco
2Polydisciplinary Faculty Safi, Laboratory of Ecology and Environment,
Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, University Cadi Ayyad, Marrakesh, Morocco
3Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valuation of Natural Resources—Faculty of Sciences, Agadir, Morocco
4Root Symbiosis Laboratory, Sylviculture Department, Forest Research Centre, Rabat, Morocco
Email: *saidov2007@gmail.com
Received September 6th, 2013; revised October 4th, 2013; accepted November 2nd, 2013
Copyright © 2014 Said El Mrabet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights ©
2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Said El Mrabet et al. All Copyright ©
2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian.
A field experiment was carried out in arid area to assess the influence of mycorrhizal inoculation with a
native complex and bio-compost addition on establishment of Argania spinosa. The experimental area
was located in the Admine forest at Agadir (Southwestern Morocco). The results showed a positive effect
of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the growth of Argania spinosa seedlings in the nursery. Six
months after planting, the mycorrhizal complex revealed an increase in the growth of Argan seedlings
(51%) compared to non mycorrhizal plants. In the field conditions, after one year of transplantation, this
benefit was maintained. Results showed that the height of Argan seedlings treated with AMF was double
that of the control group. An additional positive effect of inoculation with AMF on plant biomass was
observed and it was closely related to colonization by these microorganisms. There was an estimated
169% increase in biomass compared to contro l plants. The use of bio-compost alone or in combination with
AMF improved the production of shoot biomass of Argan plants (84% and 108% respectively compared
to control plants). In addition, AMF improved the survival rate and the contents of nitrogen (N) and
phosphorus (P) in the tissues of A. spinosa plants. A significant positive correlation between dry biomass
and nutrient content in plant tissue was detected. The content of (P) in the leaves and roots of inoculated
plants was higher than those in non-inoculated and pla nted seedlings in amended soils. Th is result reaffirms
the prime necessity of mycorrhiza in arid conditions. Thus the introduction of mycorrhizal fungi in forest
nurseries is a key tool to improve the quality of seedlings produced and their resistance in reforestation sites.
Keywords: Argania spinosa; Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi; Bio-Compost; Regeneration
Introduction
The Argan tree (Argania spinosa L. Skeels) is one of the
most remarkable species of Moroccan forest landscape. Argan
ecosystems, which cover 871,000 ha (IFN, 1996), were origi-
nally the most special agroforestry system in Morocco. Argan
forests have been exploited for edible oil, firewood, timber, as a
forage for goats and sheep, and as a shade tree for cereal crops,
thereby, supporting the economy of the indigenous population
(Alados, 2008). Indeed, the sustainability of the Argan ecosys-
tem in particular in the plain is affected by the grazing pressure
that trees are encountering intensive agriculture and the arid
climate. Currently this ecosystem continues to be destroyed
with all its components of biodiversity. There are only some
Argan trees scattered in areas that are polluted by pesticides
(Benabid, 2000). The ecosystem has regressed in terms of area
and especially density, mainly due to clearing of Argan trees
and removal of floristic cortege. Between the years of 1969-
1986, the Argan plain lost almost 9900 hectares, an average of
550 ha/year (EL Yousfi, 1988). Due to overexploitation of
these forest resources, there has been an increase in the deteri-
oration of the various components of the ecosystem, especially
plant communities. However, it is recognized that such conse-
quences necessarily lead to the degradation of the physico-
chemical and biological properties of soils (Skujins & Allen,
1986; Albaladejo et al., 1998; Requena et al., 2001; Azcon-
Aguilar et al., 2002). This degradation is manifested by a re-
duction in the diversity and/or terrestrial microbial activity
(Kenny & Smith, 1995). Consequently, the reduction or loss of
this potential can influence the nutritional status of plants and
limit the success of native species plantations (Sylvia, 1990;
*Corresponding a uthor.
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
15
Roldan et al., 1997; Van der Heijden et al., 1998). However,
research has proven that inoculation of plants by mycosymbi-
otes not only facilitates installation of plants (Herrera et al.,
1993; Smith & Read, 2008; Alguacil, 2011) but also improves
the physico-chemical and biological properties of the soil, the-
reby improving soil quality (Carrillo-Garccia et al., 1999; Rillig
and Mummey, 2006; Schmid et al., 2008). This quality can be
improved and the productivity of degraded soils can also be
improved by adding organic soil amendments (Roldan et al.,
1994; Garcia et al., 1998; Zendejas et al., 2011). The beneficial
effects of these amendments include reducing soil bulk density,
improving the capacity of water retention and infiltration rate,
and aggregating stability and development of biochemical ac-
tivities (Zebarth et al., 1999; Caravaca et al., 2002; Fuentes et
al., 2010).
Regeneration programs of Argan tree in the Argan plain for-
est have been initiated since 2000, but have not yielded the
expected results. The reasons for this include: 1) the use of
reforestation techniques is not adapted to difficult soil and cli-
matic conditions prevailing in the arid and semi-arid south-west
of Morocco, 2) the Argan seedlings produced are often non
mycorrhized, and 3) there is no assessment of land mycorrhizal
potential before the launch of any reforestation program. Re-
forestation strategy based on the use of mycorrhizal plant bio-
technology as a tool has never been tested in reconstruction of
the Argan ecosystem. This strategy essentially adapted to
semi-arid and arid areas (Nelson & Safir, 1982) should be
based on an assessment of the chemical and biological soil
fertility, in particular, the estimation of mycorrhizal capacity of
soils. Therefore, the use of local mycorrhizal potential deriving
from shrubs could be considered as a preferential inoculation
strategy to ensure the success of reforestation with native spe-
cies in arid and semi-arid degraded areas (Requena et al., 2001;
Caravaca et al., 2002; Duponnois et al., 2011). Similarly, it has
been shown that in these areas, mycorrhizal fungi help plants
growth and cope with nutrient deficiency, drought, soil distur-
bance and other environmental stresses (Barea et al., 2007;
Martínez-García & Pugnaire, 2009; Martínez-García, 2010).
Some studies have only investigated the effects of mycorrhi-
za on seedlings of Argania spinosa in controlled conditions.
They showed that mycorrhizal inoculation with an artificial
inoculum containing Glomus intraradices has improved growth
and nutrition of seedlings (Nouaim, 1994; Bousselmame et al.,
2002; Echairi et al., 2008). Whereas in this study, we attempt to
evaluate the effect of mycorrhization while using a native in-
oculum, first on Argan seedlings at the nursery stage and se-
condly, it is important to check if the pre-inoculation of seedl-
ings could insure a sustainable advantage after transplantation
on natural environment.
In the present study, we used Argania spinosa, which is well
adapted to water stress conditions and belongs to the natural
succession of arid ecosystems in south western of Morocco.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the benefits of the use
of mycorrhizal symbionts to produce vigorous Argan plants
that are able to thrive in threatened land, and to evaluate the
effectiveness of the mycorrhizal inoculation and the addition of
bio-compost through their impact on the physico-chemical
characteristics of rhizosphere soil, on growth, nutrition and
survival of Argania spinosa seedlings planted in field condi-
tions under arid Mediterranean bioclimate. Indeed, two inde-
pendent experiments were carried out in this study and were
individually addressed in the Methods section, as well as in the
Results a nd the Discussion: 1) Evaluation of the effect of native
mycorrhizal complex on growth and nutrition of the Argan
seedlings under greenhouse conditions and 2) Evaluation of
mycorrhiza and the addition of bio-compost on the growth and
nutrition of the Argan seedlings in field conditions.
Material and Methods
Study Site
The experimental area was located in the Argan forest Ad-
mineat Agadir in southwestern of Morocco (coordinates
9˚36'22''W and 33˚55'39''N). The bio-climate can be described
as Mediterranean arid with an average annual rainfall of 243
mm and the elevation above sea level is 63 m. The analytical
characteristics of the soil in the experimental plot, determined
by standard methods (Page et al., 1982) are shown in Table 1.
The plot chosen, occupies an area of 32 a, is devoid of Argan
trees to avoid their influence on young seedlings. This ecosys-
tem had known since the 70s a considerable development of
vegetable and fruit crops which consuming very large amounts
of water drawn by pumping groundwater. However, it is recog-
nized that many communities of AMF are sensitive to distur-
bance associated with agriculture and fertilizer use (Helgason et
al., 1998).
Material
Origin of Argan Seeds
Argan trees can reach 10 to 12 m high and are characterized
by a rugged trunk with rough and cracked bark. This endemic
species in Morocco and irreplaceable in its range is the only
species capable of stopping severe desertification phenomena
observed in recent years in the region (Msanda, 2004) and
therefore it is frequently used in reforestation programs in
semi-arid and arid disturbed lands. The seeds used in this study
were collected under the canopy of Argan trees in the Admine
forest.
Table 1 .
Physico-chemical and biological characteristics of the soil in Ad-
mine forest.
Texture Fine silty-cl a y-sand
pH (H2O) 8.35
Total carbon (%) 0.98
MO (%) 1.69
Total Nit ro g en ( % ) 0.15
C/N 6.53
Available P (mg/Kg) 9
Extractable K (mg/kg) 497
Magnesia (MgO) (mg/kg) 748
Copper (mg/kg) 1.98
Zinc (mg/kg) 1.06
Iron (mg/kg) 6.69
Total limestone % 5.3
AM infective propagules
(MPNg1 dry soil) 0.14
Note: MPN: Most Probable Number.
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
16
Characteristics of bio-Compost
The bio-compost used is organic vegetable compost disin-
fected by thermotherapy. The chemical characteristics of the
bio-compost are shown in Table 2.
Experiment 1: Evaluation of the Effect of Native
Mycorrhi zal Comp l e x on Growth and Nutrition of the
Argan Seedlings under Greenhouse Conditi ons
Production of Inoculum and Inoculation of the Argan
Seedlings
The corn (Zea mays L.) was used as endophytic plant for the
production of endomycorrhizal inoculum. Corn seeds were
disinfected in a solution of 30% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min
and rinsed several times with sterile distilled water and then
planted for three months in plastic pots containing soil from a
preserved Argan forest mountain “Mesguina” at Agadir in
southwestern Morocco (coordinates 9˚47'14''W and 34˚5'4''N).
The soil was taken near the roots (rhizosphere) of Argan trees
and shrubs associated with the tree. Therefore the inoculum
consisted of a mixture of rhizosphere containing spores, hyphae,
and fragments of infected corn roots. This endomycorrhizal
fungi complex, dominated by the Glomus genus is also consti-
tuted by Scutellospora and Acaulospora genus. The inoculum
was brought to the substrate consisting of peat disinfected in
containers of 500 ml. The sowing operation of Argan pre-ger-
minated seeds was carried out in October 2011. Half seedlings
(84U) were planted in a mixture of substrate consisting of peat
and inoculum which is 5% of the substrate. The second half of
seedlings were planted in the same amount of mixture disin-
fected using the autoclave. Seedlings were grown in a green-
house where the temperature was 25˚C to 35˚C with daily wa-
tering. After four months, a total of sixty four each inoculated
and non-inoculated seedlings were planted in the experimental
plot “Admine”. Experiment in greenhouse was continued on
twenty plants each for two months. After the completion of the
observation period in the greenhouse (six months), five plants
were randomly collected to assess the dry biomass, the rate of
mycorrhizal and nutrition of Argan seedlings.
Relative Mycorrhizal Dependency Index (RMDI)
Relative Mycorrhizal Dependency Index is calculated from
the a verage values of shoot and root dry weight of mycorrhizal
Table 2.
Chemical characteristics of bio-compost used in the experiment.
Parameters Bio-compost
pH (H2O) 6
Total ca r bon (%) 35
MO (%) 60
Total Nitrogène (%) 3
C/N 11.6
P (%) 2
K (%) 2
Copper (mg/kg) 150
Zinc (mg/ kg) 100
iron (mg/kg) 2000
plants (DWM) and non-mycorrhizal (DWNM) as described by
Plenchette et al. (1983):
( )
*100.RMDIDWM DWNM DWM


= −
Experiment 2: Evaluation of Mycorrhiza and the
Addition of Bio-Compost on the Growth and
Nutrition of the Argan Seedlings in Field Conditions
Experimental Design and Layout
The experimental plot sufficiently homogeneous was pre-
pared in august 2011 (Opening 128 holes cubic shape 60 * 60 *
60 cm in sixteen lines). The experimental was a randomized
complete block design with two factors of classification: in-
oculation or not mycorrhizal complex and the addition or not of
bio-compost. During the experiment, four treatments and eight
plants per treatment with four repetitions were held on the field
in the form of blocks. Each block contains 32 plants (eight ×
four treatment plants). Half of the holes were amended by 3
kg/hole of bio-compost (Table 2) at a depth of 0 - 20 cm a
month before planting. Thus, mycorrhizal plants and controls
were planted in January 2012 in Admine site. Regular watering
was assured in shearling 10L/plant/month until august 2012. In
September 2012, the irrigation operations were suspended after
registration of significant rainfall slices.
Sampling Pr oc edures
One year after planting, four soil samples from each treat-
ment were collected (16 soil samples in total). Each sample
consisted of five sub-samples (200 cm3 soil cores) randomly
collected at 0 - 20 cm in the rhizosphere of five individual
plants. The samples were taken in early February 2013 (before
the dry season) when the highest microbial activity would be
expected (Lax et al., 1997). Furthermore, four plants of each
treatment (one per block) were harvested for analysis.
Plant Analysis and Plant Growth
Twelve months after planting, samples (leaf and root) were
oven dried at 68˚C for 72 h, then crushed. The total nitrogen (N)
was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Page et al., 1982).
Available P was determined by colorimetry according to Mur-
phy and Riley (1962). Extractable K was determined by flame
photometry (Schollemberger and Simon, 1954).The percentage
of root length colonized by AM fungi was calculated by the
gridline intersect method (Giovannetti and Mosse, 1980) after
staining with trypan blue (Phillips & Hayman, 1970).
Regular monitoring of Argan plants was also carried out
during the period of observation. Thus, basal stem diameter,
plant height (main and secondary branches) and survival rates
were recorded after 4, 7, 9 and 12 months from the date of
planting.
Soil Physical-Chemical Analysis
Soil pH was measured in a 1:5 (w:v) aqueous solution. The
total organic carbon (C) was determined by the method of
Yeomans and Bremner, 1989. Total nitrogen (N), available P
(with sodium bicarbonate (Olsen et al., 1954)), and extractable
K (with ammonium acetate) were determined following the
methods described above for plant tissues.
Statistical Analysis
The effects of bio-compost, mycorrhizal inoculation and their
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
17
interactions on measured variables were tested by a two-way
analysis of variance and comparisons among means were made
using least significant difference (LSD) calculated at P < 0.05.
The analysis of correlation between the measured parameters
was performed using Pearson’s rank correlation coefficients.
All data were processed using SPSS Version 18 software.
Results
Experiment 1: Effect of Mycorrhiza on Growth and
Nutrition of the Argan Seedlings under Greenhouse
Conditions
Roots Mycorrhizal Colonization, Growth and Nutrition of
Argan Plant s under Greenhou se Conditions
A positive effect of the AM fungi on Argan seedlings was
shown (Figure 1). Six months after planting, mycorrhizal in-
oculation improved growth of Argan seedlings by 51%. A sim-
ilar trend was observed with basal diameter (on average 29%)
The influence on the biomass production was important. The
average dry root weight was 66% higher compared to control
plants (Table 3). With regard to dry shoot weight, the average
was 60% higher than non-inoculated plants. The mycorrhiza
has also a significant effect on the N and P content of foliar
tissues of Argan plants. The concentrations of N and P are re-
spectively 185% and 118% higher in mycorrhizal plants com-
pared with controls.
Colonization rate of Argan seedling roots had shown that at
least 54.9% of roots are occupied by the mycorrhizal fungi
(Table 3).
Relative Mycorrhizal Dependency Index (RMDI )
Relative Mycorrhiza l Dependency Index, cal culated on the ba -
sis of the a verage dry weight of shoots and roots of mycorrhizal
and non-mycorrhizal plants is 39% after six months of growth.
13.6
19.3
22.1
11
12.8
14.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
5 month
plant height (cm)
MYCORRHIZAL
PLANT
CONTROL
1.49
2.4
3.1
1.29
1.8
2.4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 month
5 month
6 month
Basal stem diameter (mm)
MYCORRHIZAL
PLANT
CONTROL
Figure 1.
Plant height and basal diameter of Argan seedlings inoculated
and not after 4, 5 and 6 months under greenhouse conditions.
Experiment 2: Effect of Mycorrhiza and the Addition
of Bio-Compost on the Growth and Nutrition of the
Argan Seedlings after 12 Months Transplantation in
Field Conditions
Physico-Chemical Parameters of Rhizosphere Soil of Argan
Plants
One year after planting, the addition of composted residue
and mycorrhizal inoculation significantly decreased soil pH
(Table 4). The combination of these two methods of reforesta-
tion (CRM) produced significantly higher values of total nitro-
gen (N) compared to control soil. The addition of bio-compost
increased significantly the levels of total organic carbon and
extractable K, while the total limestone content was signifi-
cantly lower compared to non-amended soils (M and C). Fur-
thermore, the content of available phosphorus in the soil was
increased by the addition of bio-compost. Thus, the content of
available phosphorus in soils amended with bio-compost (CR
and CRM) was about four times higher than in non-amended
soil (C and M). The analysis also showed that mycorrhizal in-
oculation (M) has slightly higher values in total organic C, N, P
and K compared to the values recorded in the rhizosphere soil
of the control plants (C). However, there was no statistically
significant difference between treatments (LSD test). Both me-
thods of reforestation (M, CR and CRM) have a C/N ratio
ranged between 8 and 10, which means the presence of a good
biological activity, while the rhizosphere of control plants
present a ratio which is about 6.9, indicating that there is a low
biological activity in the control soil (Table 4).
Roots Colonization, Biomass Production and Mineral
Nutrition of Argan Plants
Twelve months after planting, the mycorrhizal colonization
of non-inoculated seedlings planted in amended and non-
amended soil (CR and C) have increased by an average of
26.25% and 20% as a result of natural infection (Table 5).
However, there were no significant differences between the
values of these two treatments. Mycorrhizal plants (M) in
non-amended soils showed the highest percentages of root co-
lonization (77.5%) followed by inoculated plants planted in
amended soil CRM (55%). Thus, application of the amendment
had a negative effect on the mycorrhizal colonization of inocu-
lated plants. Furthermore, inoculation had the greatest effect on
the growth of Argan plants producing about 169% shoot dry
matter more than in the control plants at the end of the observa-
tion period. Therefore, stimulating the production of biomass
observed in inoculated plants (M) can be linked to the ability of
the fungi to increase the absorption of nutrients including NPK
from soil relatively low in nutrients compared to amended soils
(Tables 4 and 5). Amended plants (CR and CRM) have shown
also that shoot dry biomass was significantly higher compared
to those of control plants (at least 84%). Results had shown that
the two methods of reforestation (mycorrhizal inoculation or
addition of bio-compost) contributed separately (M or CR) and
simultaneously (CRM) to improve NPK contents in foliar and
root tissues of Argan plants. Therefore, leaf tissues of plants in
amended soil (CR) have significantly higher N, P and K content
than the control plants (C). The combination of the two me-
thods of reforestation (CRM) also produced plants with a leaves
and roots content of NP significantly higher than the control
plants (C). The analysis had shown that the P content in leaf
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
18
Table 3.
Growth, nutrition and roo ts mycorrhizal colonization o f inoculated and non-inoculated Argan plants after 6 months under greenhouse conditions (n =
5).
Height (cm) Basal
Diameter (mm) Aerial dry
weight (g) 1 Root d ry
weight (g) 2 tot al dry wei ght
(g) 3
=
1
+
2 Total N % P mg /plant Roots Mycorrhizal
colonization (%)
Mycorrhizal Plants
24.1a
(±4.47) 3.5a
(±0.42) 0.93a
(±0.21) 0.74a
(±0.18) 1.67a
(±0.38) 4a
(±0.86) 24a
(±1.58) 54.9
(±13.39)
controls 16.2b
(±1.52) 2.83b
(0.13) 0.56b
(±0.13) 0.46b
(±0.14) 1.02b
(±0.14) 1.4b
(±0.15) 11b
(±1.59) 0
Note: Values sharing the sa me lette r within a column are not sig nificantly different at 5% by the LSD test.
Table 4.
Changes in soil chemical properties in response to mycorrhizal inoculation (M) and the addition of bio-compost (CR) (n = 4)
pH (H2O) Total organic
C % total N % P Available
(mg/kg) K Extractable
(mg/kg) C/N Total l imestone (%)
M 8.51a
(±0.43) 1.51ab
(±0.53) 0.18ab
(±0.15) 27.25a
(±2.5) 847a
(±54.3) 8.30ab
(±2.26) 12.42a
(±2.85)
CRM 8.52a
(±0.25) 1.92a
(±0.5) 0.19a
(±0.13) 143b
(±42.4) 850a
(±112.6) 10.26a
(±1.9) 6.25b
(±2.29)
CR 8.55a
(±0.31) 1.80a
(±0.22) 0.18ab
(±0.04) 119.2b
(±18.2) 1218b
(±195) 10.06a
(±1.33) 6.7b
(±2.25)
C 8.62b
(±0.14) 1.16b
(±0.93) 0.17b
(±0.05) 25.75a
(±2.9) 775a
(±30.7) 6.91b
(±0.73) 13.77a
(±0.99)
Note: Values sharing the same letter within a column are not significantly different at 5% (LSD test). (C: control soil, without mycorrhizal ino culation and without com-
posted re sidue addition a nd CRM: c omposted residue addition + mycorrhizal inoculation).
Table 5.
Roots colonization, biomass prod uction and mineral nutrition of Argan plants after 1 2 months transplan tation after mycorrhizal inoculatio n (M) and
composted re s idue (CR) addit ion (n = 4).
Shoot aerial dry
weight (g)
Root coloni s ation
(%) Foliaire tis sue s Root tissues
P mg/kg K mg /kg Total N % P mg/kg K mg/kg Total N %
M 28.95a
(±1.17) 77.5a
(±8.6) 1.64a
(±0.17) 10.80ab
(±1.70) 3.32a
(±0.12) 0.92a
(±0.07) 7.54a
(±0.14) 0.886a
(±0.017)
CRM 22.45b
(±4.08) 55b
(±17.3) 1.04b
(±0.68) 10.51ab
(±2.23) 3.11a
(±0.23) 0.67b
(±0.04) 7.62a
(±0.05) 0.889a
(±0.009)
CR 19.84b
(±4.77) 26.25c
(±4.7) 1.01b
(±0.76) 13.74a
(±1.94) 3.09a
(±0.11) 0.6bc
(±0.05) 3.4b
(±1.05) 0.901a
(±0.024)
C 10.76c
(±3.29) 20c
(±7) 0.74c
(±0.51) 7.80b
(±4.29) 2.71b
(±0.16) 0.55c
(±0.03) 4.06b
(±0.09) 0.545b
(±0.013)
Note: Values sharing the same letter within a column are not significantly different at 5% (LSD test). (C: control soil, without mycorrhizal inoculation and without bio-
compost r esidue additio n and CRM: compost residue addition + mycorr hizal inoculation).
and root tissues of inoculated plants (M) is significantly higher
than that of plants in the other treatments (CR, CRM and C).
The inoculated plants (M) present a difference of the P content
in leaf and root tissues, respectively, 121% and 67% compared
to the values recorded in control plants (Table 5).
The growth and survival of Argan plants
At the moment of planting, the inoculated plants showed
higher growth in height (13.5 cm) than non-inoculated plants
(10.9 cm). This difference was significant at the 5% level
(LSD). Twelve months after planting, the addition of bio-
compost and mycorrhizal inoculation improved both the growth
compared to the control soil (C). Height was improved respec-
tively by 79% and 158% (Figure 2). However, the combined
mycorrhizal× bio-compost treatment (CRM) had only a slight
additive effect but not significant with respect to the addition of
bio-compost (CR). This effect improved the growth of Argan
plants approximately 87% compared to control plants, while the
comparison between the two methods of planting on the growth
of Argan plants showed that the effect of inoculation is indeed
net. Consequently, the mycorrhizal plants (M) are much greater
than non-mycorrhizal plants planted in amended soil (CR). The
difference was significant between the two treatments on the
total height of the main axes and secondary axes and it main-
tains over time to record the seventh month after the date of
planting 58%, 39% in the ninth month and 43% in the 12th
month. A similar trend was observed on the growth of basal
diameter (Figure 2).
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
19
Mycorrhizal symbiosis also helps Argan seedlings to survive
under extreme climatic conditions in this arid area. Indeed, as Figure 3 shows, twelve months after the plantation the percen-
tage of survival inoculated plants (71.8% for M and 68.7% for
Figure 2.
Effect of composted residue addition (CR) and mycorrhizal inoculation (M) on growth (Height and basal di-
ameter) of Argania spinosa under field conditions at the time of planting and after 4, 7, 9 and 12 months from
the date of planting (n = 4). (C: control soil, withou t mycorrhizal inoculation an d without composted residue a d-
dition and CRM: composted residue addition + mycorrhizal inoculation).
78
75
75
72
78
75
72
69
75
66
66
66
63
56
56
56
0
20
40
60
80
100
4month
7month
9month
12month
Survival rate %
Plant age
M
CRM
CR
C
Figure 3.
Survival plants of Argania spinosa in response to mycorrhizal inoculation (M) and the addition of
bio-compost (CR) after 4, 7, 9 and 12 months from the date of planting in the experimental plot. (C: contro l
soil, without mycorrhizal inoculation and without composted resid ue addition and CRM: composted resid ue
addition + mycorrhizal inoculation).
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
20
CRM) was much higher than within non-inoculated plants
(65.6% for CR and 56.2% for C), although there was no statis-
tically significant difference between the first three treatments
(M, CR and CRM). However, the values of the survival rate of
the control plants (C) are significantly lower than those of other
treatments (M, CR and CRM).
Discussion
Effectiveness of Mycorrhiza under Greenhouse
Conditions
This study showed that mycorrhizal inoculation with a native
complex has a positive and significant effect on height, basal
diameter, and biomass and NP contents of leaf tissues of Argan
plants which were planted six months under greenhouse. This
study confirms the results obtained in nursery stage by several
authors (Nouaim, 1994; Bousselmame et al., 2002; Echairi et
al., 2008). The study also shows that the Argan tree is depen-
dent on mycorrhiza for its development and mineral nutrition.
The RMDI calculated (39%), after six months, is lower than
those found by Nouaim (1994) and Echairi et al. (2008) using a
non-native inoculum containing Glomus intraradices to per-
form the mycorrhiza of Argan plants produced respectively by
in vitro culture and from seeds. Nouaim (1994) found 78% of
RMDI after six months of growth. However, Echairi et al.
(2008) found 48% after nine months of aging under controlled
conditions. The last authors observed an increase in height,
shoot and root biomass respectively 40%, 93% and 41% of
mycorrhizal plants compared to control plants.
Effectiveness of Mycorrhizal Inoculation
Several authors have emphasized the role of AMF in the ab-
sorption of water, absorption of nutrients and stimulation of the
growth of many plant species (Roldan et al., 1996b; Smith &
Read, 1997; Jeffries et al., 2003; Ouahmane et al., 2007). In this
study, inoculation of Argania spinosa seedlings has signifi-
cantly stimulated the production of biomass during the first
year of planting, which is the most critical period for reforesta-
tion, especially in the Mediterranean semi-arid and arid areas
(Meddad-Hamza et al., 2010; Ouahmane et al., 2012). Fur-
thermore, the effect of inoculation on plant biomass is posi-
tively correlated to the level of colonization by AMF (Table 6).
At the end of the period of growth, mycorrhiza increased shoot
biomass of Argan plants to a greater extent, about 169% com-
pared to control plants. Previous studies in Mediterranean areas
have shown similar results. Indeed, Caravaca et al. (2002),
showed that the biomass of inoculated seedlings of Olea euro-
pea subsp. sylvestris and Pistacia lentiscus raised after a year of
planting, respectively to 630% and 300% compared to non-
inoculated plants. Caravaca et al. (2003b) also showed that the
production of root plants biomass of Dorycnium pentaphyllum
inoculated by Glomus intraradices increased by 116% com-
pared to non-inoculated plants. The total content of plant nu-
trients can be considered as a representative indicator of the
effectiveness of mycorrhiza, because it takes into account the
well balanced effects of nutrient uptake and biomass production
(Jeffries et al., 2003). Indeed, the highest levels of P and N in
the leaf tissues were observed in the inoculated plants, which
could explain why the growth of Argania spinosa seedlings was
the highest in this treatment. Thus, we noticed that there is a
positive and significant correlation between shoot dry biomass
Table 6.
Pearson rank correlation between foliar and root levels of NPK, shoot
aerial dry weight and root colonization % (n = 4)a.
Shoot aerial
dry weight
Root colonisation%
FP 0.789** 0.804**
FK 0.265ns 0.037ns
FN 0.806** 0.758**
RP 0.696** 0.827**
RK 0.626** 0.818**
RN 0.753** 0.547*
Root coloni s ation% 0.878** 1
Note: aCorrelation coefficient (significance level); *, **: Respectively significant at
P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; ns: not significant. FP: Foliar P content, FK: foliar K
content; FN: foliar N content, RP: P content in root, RK: K content in root; RN: N
content in root.
and nutrient N and P in plant tissue (Table 6). It is also impor-
tant to note that mycorrhizal inoculation was more effective
than the addition of composted residue on the leaf and root P
content of A. spinosa plants, even if the available P in the rhi-
zosphere soil of plants treated with composted waste is four
times higher than in the rhizosphere soil of inoculated plants.
These results once again reaffirm the capital role of AMF in P
uptake (Harrison, 1999; Bago et al., 2002; Ohtomo & Saito,
2005; Helgason & Fitter, 2009; Smith et al., 2004, 2009). Si-
milarly, increasing the nitrogen content in the tissues of my-
corrhizal plants may be due to the ability of AMF to improve
the decomposition of organic matter and nitrogen capture
(Hodge et al., 2001), and increase the absorption of P which
strongly favors the biological N2 fixation (Azcon & Barea,
1992).
The study also showed that inoculation with the AMF is able
to improve the survival rate of transplanted Argan seedlings in
the Mediterranean degraded environments. This result is in
agreement with the results obtained through the mycorrhizal
symbiosis by several authors in similar conditions. They
showed significant improvement in the survival of many forest
species after transplantation in unfavorable environments
(Boutekrabt et al., 1999; Requena et al., 2001; Ouahmane et al.,
2007, Abbas et al., 2013).
Mycorrhiza is an essential component that facilitates the
success of programs of plant regeneration on degraded soils and
before initiating these programs, so it is necessary to study the
existing vegetation and their partners, particularly mycorrhizal
propagules (Jasper, 1994) that control the biogeochemical
cycles of major elements of soil (Kennedy & Smith, 1995; Re-
quena et al., 2001; Palenzuela et al., 2002; Jeffries et al., 2003;
Ouahmane, 2007). Thus, these programs must include the re-
construction of the mycorrhizal population (Barea et al., 1990)
which can be done through: 1) assessment of mycorrhizal status
of soils including isolation, identification and characterization
of local AM fungi targeted land and 2) the production of a se-
lected inoculum from these AMF which are able to improve the
quality of plants to thrive in arid conditions via improving the
assimilation of nutrients especially P and N (Toro et al., 1997),
mitigation of water stress (Augé, 2001; Herrera et al., 1993;
Roldan et al., 1996b; Barea et al., 2008; Honrubia, 2009) and
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
21
improving the quality of soil (Jeffries & Barea, 2001) and fi-
nally the development of resistance against diseases (Pozo et al.,
1999; Dalpe, 2005; Tahat et al., 2012).
Effectiveness of Soil Amendments
The result of this study has shown the effectiveness of the
addition of bio-compost to improve the growth and nutritional
status (NPK) of young Argan plants. This result is based on the
improvement of soil fertility. In this regard, the addition of
bio-compost increased levels of total organic C, total N, availa-
ble P, extractable K and C/N ratio of the soil, with the largest
increase being observed for available P. This is in agreement
with the conclusion of Roldán et al. (1996a); Caravaca et al.
(2002); and Zendejas et al. (2011), which found that the posi-
tive effect of composted residue on chemical parameters is
primarily due to phosphorus. We also noticed that the soil
amendment has led to a decrease in pH soil. The application of
organic amendments to the soil is an effective method to im-
prove the physico-chemical and microbiological properties of
degraded soils, which in turn promote the creation of stable
vegetation (Roldán et al., 1994). Thus, at the end of the growth
period, the addition of bio-compost increased the biomass of
the Argan seedlings to about 84% compared to control plants.
Effectiveness of the Combination of Soil Amendment
and Mycorrhizal Inoculation
The field experiment also showed that the combination of
soil amendment and mycorrhizal inoculation caused the largest
increase in the total nitrogen content in the rhizosphere of Ar-
gania spinosa. It should also be noted that this combined treat-
ment significantly stimulates the production of biomass in arid
conditions. Thus, it has increased the growth of A. spinosa
seedlings but to a lesser extent as the only treatment of mycorr-
hizal inoculation. There was almost a slightly additive effect
but not significant, compared to adding only bio-compost. This
result is consistent with the widely accepted idea that mycorr-
hiza has few advantages over plants in amended soils (Yanai et
al., 1995; Caravaca et al., 2004). However, our results are in
disagreement with the work of Caravaca et al. (2002, 2003a).
They showed an additive and positive effect of composted
waste and mycorrhizal inoculation on the growth of Retama
sphaerocarpa and Olea europaea subsp. sylvestris plants in
Mediterranean semi-arid condi tions. T he additi on of bio-compost,
inoculation with AM fungi and the combination of these two
treatments had no significant effect on the survival of Argan
plants during the first year of planting. The survival rate of
three treatments ranges from 66% to 72%. These results are
quite similar to those obtained by Alguacil et al. (2008).
In conclusion, the addition of bio-compost was effective to
improve the physical, chemical and biological quality of the
rhizosphere soil of seedlings. Yet, the mycorrhizal inoculation
was the most effective treatment for stimulating the growth of
Argania spinosa plants on abandoned farmlands and subject to
Mediterranean arid climatic conditions. This treatment also has
a significant positive effect on height, basal diameter, biomass,
N and P contents of the plant tissues.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Deutsche Ge-
sellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)/(Adaptation
to climate change project).
REFERENCES
Abbas, Y., Bakkali, Y. S., Prin, Y., Arahou, M., Abourouh, M., &
Duponnois, R. (2013). Growth and nutrition of Tetraclinis articulata
(Vahl) Mast.cultivated in different rhizosphere soils collected from
Tetraclinis stand. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environ-
ment, 17, 3-11.
Alados, C. L., & El Aich, A. (2008). Stress assess ment of Argan (Ar-
gania spinosa (L.) Skeels) in response to land uses across an aridity
gradient: Translational asymmetry and branch fractal di mension.
Journal of Arid E nvironment, 72, 338-349.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.015
Albaladejo, J., Martinez-Mena, M., Roldan, A., & Castillo, V. (1998).
Soil degradation and desertification induced by vegetation removal
in a semiarid environment. Soil Use Manage, 14, 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1998.tb00602.x
Alguacil, M. M., Caravaca, F., Azcónb, R., & Roldán, A. (2008).
Changes in biological activity of a degraded Mediterranean soil after
using microbially-treated dry olive cake as a biosolid amendment and
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44,
347-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.02.001
Alguacil, M. M., Torrecillas, E., Kohler, J., & Roldan, A. (2011). Amo-
lecular approach to ascertain the success of “in situ” AM fungi in-
oculation in the revegetation of a semiarid, degraded land. Science of
the Total Environment, 409, 2874-2880.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.029
Augé, R. M. (2001). Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular
mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza, 11, 3-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s005720100097
Azcon, R., & Barea, J. M. (1992). Nodulation, N2 fixation (5N) and N
nutrition relationships in mycorrhizal or phosphate-amended alfalfa
plants. Symbiosis, 12, 33-41.
Azcón-Aguilar, C., Palenzuela, E. J., Roldan, A., Bautista, S., Vallejo,
R., & Barea, J. M. (2002). Analysis of the mycorrhizal potential in
the rhizosphere of representative plant species from desertification-
threatened Mediterranean shrublands. Applied Soil Ecology, 21, 1-9.
Bago, B., Pfeffer, P. E., Zipfel, W., Lammers, P., & Shachar-Hill, Y.
(2002). Tracking metabolism and imaging transport in arbuscular
mycorrhizal f ungi. Metabolism and transport in AM fungi. Plant and
Soil, 244, 189-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020212328955
Barea, J. M., Salamanca, C. P., Herrera, M. A., & Roldán-Fajardo, B. E.
(1990). La simbiosis microbio planta en el establecimiento de
unacubiertavegetal sobre suelosdegradados. In: J. Albaladejo, M.
Stocking, & E. Díaz (Eds.), Soil degradation and rehabilitation in
Mediterranean environmental conditions (pp. 139-156). Murcia:
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Barea, J. M., Palenzuela, J., Cornejo, P., Sánchez, I., Navarro, C.,
Quiñones, P. B., Azcón, R., Ferrol, N., & Azcón-Aguilar, C. (2007).
Significado, diversidad e impacto de los hongos de las micor-
rizasarbusculares en ambientesmediterráneos. In: J. M. Barea-Azcón,
M. Moleón, R. Travesí, E. Ballesteros, J. M. Luzón, & J. M. Tierno
(Eds.), Biodiversidad y conservación de fauna y flora en ambientes
Mediterráneos (pp. 155-185). Granada: Sociedad Granatense de
Historia Natural.
Barea, J. M., Ferrol, N., Azcón-Aguilar, C., & Azcón, R. (2008). My-
corrhizal symbioses. Series. In: P. J. White, & J. P. Hammond (Eds.),
The ecophysiology of plant-phosphorus interactions. Plant cophy-
siology, Vol. 7 (pp. 143-163). Dordrecht: Springer.
Benabid, A. (2000). Flore et écosystèmes du Maroc. Paris: Ed Ibis Press.
Bousselmane, F., Kenny, L., & Achouri, M. (2002). Effet des
mycorhizes à vésicules et arbuscules sur la croissance et la nutrition
de l’arganier (Argania spinosa L.). Revue Marocaine des Sciences
Agronomiques et Vétérinaires, 22, 193-198.
Boutekrabt, A., Chevalier, G., Pargney, J. C., & Dexheimer, J. (1999).
Mycorhization par Tuber melanosporumVitt de vitroplants de Que-
rcus robur L et Quercus pubescensWilld. Agronomie, 2, 127-132.
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
22
Brundrett, M. C., Piche, Y., & Peterson, R. L. (1985). A developmental
study of the early stages in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal forma-
tion. Canadian Journal of Botany, 63, 184-194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b85-021
Carrillo-García, A., León de la Luz, J. L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay,
G. J. (1999). Nurse plants, mycorrhizae, and plant establishment in a
disturbed area of the Sonoran desert. Restoration Ecology, 7, 321-
335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72027.x
Caravaca, F., Barea, J. M., Figueroa, D., & Roldań, A. (2002). Assess-
ing the effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation and soil compost
addition for reafforestation with Olea europaea subsp. sylvestris
through changes in soil biological and physical parameters. Applied
Soil Ecology, 20, 107-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00015-X
Caravaca, F., Alguacil, M. M., Figuer oa, D. , Bar ea, J. M., & Roldán, A.
(2003a). Re-establishment of Retama sphaerocarpa as a target spe-
cies for reclamation of soil physical and biological properties in a
semiarid Mediterranean land . Forest Ecology and Management, 182,
49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00067-7
Caravaca, F., Barea, J. M., Palenzuela, J., Figueroa, D., Alguacil, M. M.,
& Roldán, A. (2003b). Establishment of shrub species in a degraded
semiarid site after inoculation with native or allochthonous arbuscu-
lar mycorrhizal fungi. Applied Soil Ecology, 22, 103-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00136-1
Caravaca, F., Alguacil, M. M., Azcón, R.,ıaz, G., & Roldán, A.
(2004). Comparing the effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation and
amendment with sugar beet, rock phosphate and Aspergillus niger to
enhance field performance of the leguminous shrub Dorycnium pen-
taphyllum L. Applied Soil Ecology, 25, 169-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.08.002
Dalpé, Y. (2005). Les mycorhizes: Un outil de protection des plantes
mais non une panacée. Phytoprotection, 86, 53-59.
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/011715ar
Duponnois, R., Ouahmane, L., Kane, A., Thioulouse, J., Hafidi, M.,
Boumezzough, A., Prin, Y., Baudoin, E., Galiana, A., & Dreyfus, B.
(2011). Nurse shrubs increased the early growth of Cupressus seedl-
ings by enhancing belowground mutualism and soil microbial activ-
ity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 2160-2168.
Echairi, A., Nouaim, R., & Chaussod, R. (2008). Intérêt de la my-
corhization contrôlée pour la production de plants d’arganier (Ar-
gania spinosa) en conditions de pépinière. Sécheresse, 19, 277-281.
EL Yousfi, M. (1988). Dégradation du couvert forestier dans le Sud
Marocain: Cas de l’arganeraie d’Admine. Rabat: Mémoire de 3 ème
cycle IAV Hassan II, 117p.
Fisher, R. A., & Yates, F. (1970). Statistical tables for biological agri-
culture and medical research (6th ed.). Davien: Hafner Publishing
Company.
Fuentes, D., Valdecantos, A., Llovet, J., Cortina, J., & Vallejo, V. R.,
(2010). Fine-tuning of sewage sludge application to pro mote the es-
tablishment of Pinus halepensis seedlings. Ecological Engineering,
36, 1213-1221.
Garcia, C., Hernández, T., Albaladejo, J., Castillo, V., & Roldán, A.
(1998). Revegetation in semiarid zones: Influence of terracing and
organic refuse on microbial activity. Soil Science Socie ty of America
Journal, 62, 670-676.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030018x
Garcia, C., León de la Luz, J.-L., Bashan, Y., & Bethlenfalvay, G. J.
(1999). Nurse plants, mycorrhizae, and plant establishment in a dis-
turbed area of the Sonoran desert. Restoration E cology, 7, 321-335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72027.x
Giovannetti, M., & Mosse, B. (1980). An evaluation of techniques for
measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New
Phytologist, 84, 489-499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
Harrison, M. J. (1999). Molecular and cellular aspects of the arbuscular
mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and
Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 361-389.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.361
Helgason, T., Daniell, T. J., Husband, R., Fitter, A. H., & Young, J. P.
Y. (1998). Ploughing up the wood-wide web? Nature, 394, 431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28764
Helgason, T., & Fitter, A. H. (2009). Natural selection and evolution in
the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Phylum Glomeromycota). Journal
of Experimental Botany, 60, 2465-2480.
Herrera, M. A., Salamanca, C. P., & Barea, J. M. (1993). Inoculation of
woody legumes with selected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhi-
zobia to recover desertified Mediterranean ecosystems. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology, 59, 129-133.
Hodge, A., Campbell, C. D., & Fitter, A. H. (2001). An arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen
directly from organic material. Nature, 413, 297-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35095041
Honrubia, M. (2009). The Mycorrhizae: A plant-fungus relation that
has existed f or more than 400 million years. Anales del Jardín
Botánico de Madrid, 66, 133-144.
IFN (1996). Synthèse de l’Inventaire forestier national marocain. Rabat:
Direction de Développement Forestier.
Jasper, D. A. (1994). Management of mycorrhiza in revegetation. In A.
D. Robson, L. K. Abbot, & N. Malajczuk (Eds.), Management of
mycorrhizas in agriculture, horticulture and forestry (pp. 211-219).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Jeffries, P., & Barea, J. M. (2001). Arbuscular mycorrhiza—A key
component of sustainable plant-soil ecosystems. In: B. Hock (Ed.),
The Mycota. IX Fungal Associations (pp. 95-113). Berlin: Springer-
Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07334-6_6
Jeffries, P., Gianinazzi, S., Perotto, S., Turnau, K., & Barea, J. M.
(2003). The contribution of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi in sustaina-
ble maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biolog y and Fertil-
ity of Soils, 37, 1-16.
Kennedy, A. C., & Smith, K. L. (1995). Soil microbial diversity and the
sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant and Soil, 170, 75-86.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02183056
Lax, A., Roldán, A., Caravaca, F., & García-Orenes, F. (1997). Rela-
tionships between aggregate i mprovement, microbiological activity
and organo-mineral complex formation in soils from semiarid areas.
In: S. G. Pandalai (Ed.), Recent resea rch developments in so il biolo-
gy and biochemistry (pp. 77-92). Trivandrum: Research Signpost.
López-Bermúdez, F., & Albaladejo, J. (1990). Factores ambientales de
la degradación delsuelo en el áreamediterránea. In: J. Albadejo, M. A.
Stocking, & E. Díaz (Eds.), Soil degradation and rehabilitation in
Mediterranean environmental conditions (pp. 15-45). Murcia: Con-
sejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Martínez-García, L. B., & Pugnaire, F. I. (2009). Interacciones entre las
comunidades de hongosformadores de micorrizasarbusculares y de
plantas. Algunosejemplos en los ecosistemassemiáridos. Ecosistemas,
18, 44-54.
Martínez-García, L. B. (2010). Micorrizas arbusculares en ecosistem-
assemiáridos. Respuesta a factoresde estrésambiental. Tesis Doc-
torales, Almería: Universidad de Almería.
Meddad-Hamza, A., Beddiar, A., Gollotte, A., Lemoine, M. C., Kus-
zala, C., & Gianinazzi, S. (2010). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi im-
prove the growth of olive trees and their resistance to transplantation
stress. African Journal of B iotechnology, 9, 1159-1167.
Msanda, F. (2004). Végétation de l’Anti Atlass occidental et de sa
retombée saharienne (Maroc). Essai de Synthèse, Thèse de Doctorat
ès Sciences, Agadir: Université Ibn Zohr.
Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method
for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica
Acta, 27, 31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
Nelson, C. E., & Safir, G. R. (1982). Increased drought tolerance of
mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutrition.
Planta, 154, 407-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01267807
Nouaïm, R. (1994). Écologie microbienne des sols d’arganeraies.
Activités microbiologiques des sols et rôle des endomycorhizes dans
la croissance et la nutrition de l’Arganier. Thèse d’État, Agadir:
Université Ibn Zohr.
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, L. A. (1954). Esti-
mation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium
bicarbonate. Circular, Vol 939 (p. 19). Washington, DC: US De-
partment of Agriculture.
S. EL MRABET ET AL.
OPEN ACCESS
23
Ohtomo, R., & Saito, M. (2005). Polyphosphate dynamics in mycorr-
hizal roots during colonization of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus.
New Phytologist, 167, 571-578.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01425.x
Ouahmane, L. (2007). Rôles des plantes associées (Lavandula et
Thymus) dans la régénération du cypres de l’atlasEffets sur la
diversité rhizosphérique. Thèse de Doctorat National, Marrakech:
Université cadi Ayyad.
Ouahmane, L., Hafidi, M., Thioulouse, J., Ducousso, M., Kisa, M., Prin,
Y., Galiana, A., Boumezzough, A., & Duponnois, R. (2007). Im-
provement of Cupressus atlantica Gaussen growth by inoculation
with native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Applied Micro-
biology, 103, 683-690.
Ouahmane, L., Ndoye, I., Morino, A., Ferradous, A., Sfairi, Y., Al
Faddy, M. N., & Abourouh, M. (2012). Inoculation of Ceratonia si-
liqua L. with native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mixture improves
seedling establishment under g reenhouse con ditions. African Journal
of Biotechnology, 11, 16422-16426.
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., & Keeny, O. R. (1982). Methods of soil
analysis. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.
Palenzuela, J., Azcoń-Aguilar, C., Figueroa, D., Caravaca, F., Roldań,
A., & Barea, J. M. (2002). Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation of
shrubs from Mediterranean ecosystems and composted residue ap-
plication on transplant performance and mycorrhizal developments in
a desertified soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 26, 170-175.
Phillips, J. M., & Hayman, D. S. (1970). Improved procedures for
clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular my-
corrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Tra nsactions of the
British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
Plenchette, C., Fortin, J. A., & Furlan, V. (1983). Growth responses of
several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P fertility. I.
Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant and Soil, 70,
199-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02374780
Pozo, M. J., Azcón-Aguilar, C., Dumas-Gaudot, E., & Barea, J. M.
(1999). β-1,3-glucanase activities in tomato roots inoculated with
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or Phytophthora parasitica: Time
course analysis and possible involvement in bioprotection. Plant
Science, 141, 149-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00243-X
Requena, N., Perez-Solis, E., Azcon-Aguilar, C., Jeffries, P., & Barea J.
M. (2001). Management of indigenous plant-microbe symbioses aids
restoration of desertified ecosystems. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 67, 495-498.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.2.495-498.2001
Rillig, M., & Mummey, D. L. (2006). Mycorrhizas and soil structure.
New Phytologist, 171, 41-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x
Roldán, A., García-Orenes, F., & Lax, A. (1994). An incubation expe-
riment to determine factors involving aggregation changes in an arid
soil receiving urban refuse. S oil Biolog y and Biochemis try, 26, 1699-
1707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90323-9
Roldán, A., Albaladejo, J., & Thornes, J. B. (1996a). Aggregate stabili-
ty changes in a semiarid soil after treatment with different organic
amendments. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 10, 139-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15324989609381428
Roldán, A., Querejeta, J. I., Albaladejo, J., & Castillo, V. (1996b).
Growth response of Pinus halepensis to inoculation with Pisolithus
arhizus in a terraced rangeland amended with urban refuse. Plant and
Soil, 179, 35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00011640
Roldán, A., García, C., & Albaladejo, J. (1997). AM fungal abundance
and activity in a chronosequence of abandoned fields in a semiarid
Mediterranean site. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 11, 211-
220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15324989709381474
Schmid, T., Meyer, J., & Oehl, F. (2008). Integration of mycorrhizal
inoculum in high alpine revegetation. Mycorrhiza works. In: F.
Feldmann, Y. Kapulnik, & J. Baar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inter-
national Symposium “Mycorrhiza for Plant Vitalityand the Joint
Meeting of Working Groups 1 - 4 of COST Action 870 (pp. 278-288).
Braunschweig: Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft.
Schollemberger, C. J., & Simon, R. H. (1954). Determination of ex-
change capacity and exchangeable bases in soils. Soil Science, 59,
13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00004
Sieverding, E. (1991). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza management in
tropical agrosystems. Eschborn: GTZ.
Skujins, J., & Allen, M. F. (1986). Use of mycorrhizae for land rehabil-
itation. MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnolo-
gy, 2, 161-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00937191
Smith, S. E., & Read, D. J. (1997). Mycorrhizal symbiosis (2nd ed.).
Academic Press, London.
Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A., & Jakobsen, I. (2004). Functional diversity
in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: The contribution of the
mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal
responses in growth or total P uptake. New Phytologist, 162, 511-524.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01039.x
Smith, S. E., & Read, D. J., (2008). Mycorrhizal symbiosis (3rd ed.).
London: Academic Press.
Smith, F. A., Grace, E. J., & Smith, S. E. (2009). More than a carbon
economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative
arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytologist, 182, 347-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02753.x
Sylvia, D. M. (1990). Inoculation of native woody p lants with ves icular-
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for phosphate mine land reclamation.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 31, 253-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(90)90224-2
Tahat, M. M., Kamaruzaman, S., & Radziah, O. (2012). The potential
of endomycorrhizal fungi in controlling tomato bacterial wilt Ralsto-
nia solanacearum under glasshouse conditions. African Journal of
Biotechnology, 11, 13085-13094.
Toro, M., Azcón, R., & Barea, J. M. (1997). Improvement of arbuscular
mycorrhiza development by inoculaltion of soil phosphate solubiliz-
ing rhizobacteria to improve rock phosphate bioavailability (32P)
and nutrient cycling. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63,
4408-4412.
Van der Hejden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P.,
Streitwolf-Engel, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., & Sanders, I. R.
(1998). Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity,
ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature, 396, 69-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/23932
Yanai, R. D., Fahey, T. J., & Miller, S. L. (1995). Efficiency of nutrient
acquisition by fine roots and mycorrhizae. In: W. K. Smith, & T. M.
Hinckley (Eds.), Resource physiology of conifers: Acquisition, allo-
cation and utilization (pp. 75-103). London: Academic Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-092591-2.50008-X
Yeomans, J. C., & Bremner, J. M. (1989). A rapid and precise method
for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Communications
in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 19, 1467-1476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103628809368027
Zebarth, L. B. J., Neilsen, G. H., Hogue, E., & Neilsen, D. (1999).
Influence of organic waste amendments on selected soil physical and
chemical properties. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 79, 501-504.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/S98-074
Zendejas, L. H. S., Solís, O. M., López, W. W., Vera, R. A., & Gon-
zález, P. J. M. (2011). Effects of compost made with sludge and or-
ganic residues on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop and arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi density. African Jou rnal of Agricultur al Research,
6, 1580-1585.