Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.07 No.09(2016), Article ID:66657,9 pages
10.4236/jmp.2016.79081
Hermitian vs PT-Symmetric Scalar Yukawa Model
Vladimir E. Rochev
State Research Center of the Russian Federation, “Institute for High Energy Physics” of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Protvino, Russia

Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Received 13 April 2016; accepted 20 May 2016; published 23 May 2016
ABSTRACT
A comparative analysis of a model of complex scalar field f and real scalar field c with interaction
for the real and purely imaginary values of coupling g in perturbative and non-perturbative regions is provided. In contrast to the usual Hermitian version (real g), which is asymptotically free and energetically unstable, the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric theory (imaginary g) is energetically stable and not asymptotically free. The non-perturbative approach based on Schwinger- Dyson equations reveals new interesting feature of the non-Hermitian model. While in the Hermitian version of theory the phion propagator has the non-physical non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region of momenta, the non-Hermitian theory substantially free of this drawback, as the singularity moves in the pseudo-Euclidean region.
Keywords:
Scalar Field Theory, Non-Hermitian Lagrangians, Schwinger-Dyson Equations, Asymptotic Behavior

1. Introduction
Non-Hermitian PT-symmetric quantum models, open at the end of the last century [1] , currently have a wide use in various fields of physics (see review [2] and references therein). For a quantum field theory the introduction into circulation the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric models is interesting as an extension of a narrow class of Hermitian models with acceptable physical and mathematical properties (such as stability, unitary, and renormalisability) and opens new possibilities for describing the properties of high-energy particles.
In works of Bender et al. [3] [4] the PT-symmetric model of a scalar field with the interaction
has been investigated. As has long been known (see [5] ), the Hermitian version of this model is asymptotically free, but the unstability of the cubic interaction leads to the fact that models of this type previously considered exclusively as a methodical examples (see, for example [6] ). For the non-Hermitian version of this model with imaginary coupling, however, the main argument of the unstability―the cubic potential is unbounded below―becomes invalid since the set of complex numbers is not an ordered set. Moreover, in work [3] , the arguments are given in favor of energy stability of the non-Hermitian model with cubic interaction. The analysis of Bender et al. (see [3] [4] ) indicates that the
theory is like a
theory: it is energetically stable, renormalized and has the trivial-type ultraviolet behavior, i.e., compared with the conventional
model, the PT-symmetric
theory exhibits new interesting properties.
In this paper we study the scalar Yukawa model, i.e., a model of a complex scalar field
(phion) and a real field
(chion) with the interaction
. This model is used in nuclear physics as a simplified version of the Yukawa model without spin degrees of freedom, as well as an effective model of the interaction of scalar quarks [7] [8] . If the coupling constant g takes purely imaginary values and the field
is a pseudoscalar, such a model is PT-symmetric. As expected, this model is a very similar to the
theory. All arguments of Bender et al. (see [3] ) concerning the unstability of the Hermitian theory and stability of non-Hermitian PT-symmetric theory fully extended to the scalar Yukawa model. An additional argument is the consideration (in the spirit of [9] ) a zero-dimensional version of the theory. The partition function

in a zero-dimensional space becomes the usual improper integral

which converges for
(non-Hermitian case) and diverges for
(Hermitian case).
In the coupling-constant perturbation theory, this model also has a very similar to the 




Section 3 presents an attempt to go beyond the coupling-constant perturbation theory. The formalism of bilocal source is used to build a non-perturbative expansion of the system of the Schwinger-Dyson equations, and equation for the phion propagator in the leading approximation of this expansion is investigated. A remarkable property is established: for the Hermitian theory the phion propagator has a non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region of momenta while for the Hermitian theory this singularity (an origin of a cut) moves in a pseudo- Euclidean region, i.e., from the point of view of the analytic properties the non-Hermitian theory is preferable.
2. Perturbation Theory and Renormalization Group
2.1. Perturbation Theory
We consider the model of interaction of a complex scalar field 


in a d-dimensional Euclidean space 


The perturbation theory on the renormalized coupling constant g gives us the following expressions for the renormalized 1PI functions:
Propagators of the phion

and of the chion

A vertex:

Here 


In the dimensional regularization (
Here 
and by adopting the MS scheme [6] , we get the counter-terms:

2.2. Renormalization Group. Hermitian Theory
The independence of initial (bare) quantities and unrenormalized Green functions from the ’t Hooft scale 

Here 
Counter-terms (5) allow us to calculate renormalization-group coefficients1




These renormalization-group coefficients quite similar to corresponding coefficients of 



At 



with the boundary condition 

For 


i.e. the model possesses the typical asymptotically-free behavior at high momenta with all consequences.
2.3. Renormalization Group. Non-Hermitian Theory
For the non-hermirian PT-symmetric theory one should make the substitution
in formulae of above Subsections. Thus, the expression for 

etc.
The situation in this case is also similar to 



Near the Gaussian point couplings are still defined by their canonical dimensions. Near the non-Gaussian fixed point (14) the scale behavior is modified in accordance with the linearized renormalization group equations. At 
The running coupling in this case is

i.e., the theory at large momenta has the trivial-type behavior, and the perturbation theory in this asymptotic region cannot be applicable.
3. Beyond the Perturbation Theory
3.1. Shcwinger-Dyson Equations
To construct the non-perturbative approximation we will use the formalism of Schwinger-Dyson equations (SDE).
The generating functional of Green functions (vacuum averages) of the model with Lagrangian (1) is the functional integral

Here 
The translational invariance of the functional integration measure leads to relations
and
which can be rewritten as the functional-differential SDE for generating functional G:

and

Here 



(Here
The differentiation of (19) over 

where

is the two-particle phion function. The differentiation of (19) over j with taking into account Equation (20) gives us the chion propagator:

etc. Thus, for a complete description of the model we need to know phion Green function only.
Excluding with the help of the SDE (18) a differentiation over j in SDE (17), we obtain at 

which only contains the derivatives over the bilocal source
Since
reflecting crossing symmetry of the two-particle function, and, accordingly, the Equation (23) can be written as

Both equations give the same coupling-constant perturbation series, and are completely equivalent from the point of view of some visionary exact solutions of Schwinger-Dyson equations. However, these equations give different non-perturbative expansion. This is due to the incomplete structure of the leading-order multi-particle functions of such expansions in terms of crossing symmetry. It is a peculiar feature of some non-perturbative approximations. In order to restore crossing symmetry lost in the leading-order approximation, it is necessary to consider the next-to-leading-order approximation. (A more detailed discussion of this issue see in the papers [11] [12] and references therein).
Equation (23) can be used for the construction of the mean-field expansion (see [11] ). In the language of Feynman diagrams the leading order of this expansion corresponds to the summation of the chains and its structure actually reproduce the renormalization-group summation of the previous section.
In this paper we consider the expansion, based on the Equation (24) (see also [12] ). In the language of Feynman diagrams the leading order of this expansion corresponds to the summation of ladder graphs, so we'll call it the ladder expansion.
For logarithm 

3.2. Legendre Transform
Equation

which determines the phion propagator can be regarded as an equation that determines implicitly 

Assuming the unique solvability of the Equation (26), we can move to a new function variable 

From definitions (26) and (27) it follows that

and SDE (25) takes the form

In this equation, it is assumed that 


which follows from the relation
3.3. Ladder Expansion
SDE (29) tells us a non-perturbative expansion of the generating functional

Next-to-the-leading-order equation is

where 

At the source being switched off, Equation (31) is the equation for the leading-order phion propagator:

A differentiation of equation (31) on 

3.4. Phion Propagator
Lets go to the Equation (33) for the phion propagator. To eliminate ultraviolet divergences in Equation (33) is sufficient to introduce counter-terms of phion-field renormalization 


leads to the renormalized equation in momentum space

where 
Below we consider the case of massless chion:

we obtain

Introducing dimension-less function
where 

which is reduced to the non-linear fourth-order differential equation

This differential equation enables us to calculate the asymptotics of 

where
i.e., for Hermitian theory with 

The equation for the inverse propagator u takes the form:

The cutoff at the lower limit of integration is introduced in order to avoid mass singularities (in the case insignificant).
The exact solution of Equation (42) is

i.e., an asymptotic behavior at large momentum given by the same formula (40).
Thus, we can conclude that for the usual Hermitian theory with 

4. Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric scalar Yukawa model has interesting properties
both perturbative and non-perturbative. In the perturbation region of small momenta, 

fixed point, a non-trivial fixed point of Wilson-Fisher type. As expected, the properties of the scalar Yukawa model in the perturbative region completely analogous to the corresponding properties of 
For a complete description of the leading-order ladder expansion, including its renormalization group analysis, it is necessary to solve Equation (34) for the three-point function. This is a very difficult task, since this equation contains a nontrivial phion propagator, described by Equation (33). Perhaps for the renormalization-group analysis, clarifying the nature of the behavior of couplings in the asymptotic region is sufficient to solve a more limited problem, namely the calculation of the vertex function at zero momentum (which is, however, also very difficult). We can assume that in the Hermitian case the theory retains the property of asymptotic freedom, and everything will return to own. For the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric theory a prediction of the answer is harder. In any case, the results indicate that the non-Hermitian scalar Yukawa model has, compared with the Hermitian version, a number of attractive features, which make it a very interesting object of study.
Acknowledgements
Author is grateful to the participants of IHEP Theory Division Seminar for useful discussion.
Cite this paper
Vladimir E. Rochev, (2016) Hermitian vs PT-Symmetric Scalar Yukawa Model. Journal of Modern Physics,07,899-907. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.79081
References
- 1. Bender, C.M. and Boettcher, S. (1998) Physical Review Letters, 80, 5243-5246.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243 - 2. Bender, C.M. (2015) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 631, Article ID: 012002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/631/1/012002 - 3. Bender, C.M., et al. (2012) Physical Review D, 85, Article ID: 085001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.085001 - 4. Bender, C.M., et al. (2013) Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 085029.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.085029 - 5. Macfarlane, A.J. and Woo, G. (1974) Nuclear Physics B, 77, 91-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90306-X - 6. Collins, J.C. (1984) Renormalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622656 - 7. Guasch, J., et al. (2009) Effective Description of Squark Interactions. JHEP, 0904, 016.
- 8. Abreu, L.M., et al. (2014) Nuclear Physics B, 881, 327-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.02.013 - 9. Cornwall, J.M. and Morris, D.A. (1995) Physical Review D, 52, 6074-6086.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6074 - 10. Dahmen, H.D. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1967) Il Nuovo Cimento A, 52, 807-836.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738845 - 11. Rochev, V.E. (2013) Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46, Article ID: 185401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/18/185401 - 12. Rochev, V.E. (2015) Elementary Particles and Fields Theory, 78, 443-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1063778815020258
NOTES
1We use the notations of Collins [6] . Note, that the complete renormalization-group analysis assumes also an addition the linear term 
2A formalism of the bilocal source was first elaborated in the quantum field theory by Dahmen and Jona-Lasinio [10] . We consider this using presumably as a convenient choice of the functional variable.
















