Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.07 No.08(2016), Article ID:66193,16 pages
10.4236/jmp.2016.78072
Tetraquark and Pentaquark Systems in Lattice QCD
Fumiko Okiharu1, Takumi Doi2, Hiroko Ichie3, Hideaki Iida4, Noriyoshi Ishii5, Makoto Oka3, Hideo Suganuma6, Toru T. Takahashi7
1Faculty of Education, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
2Theoretical Research Division, Nishina Center, RIKEN, Wako, Japan
3Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
4Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
5Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, Ibaraki, Japan
6Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
7Gunma National College of Technology, Maebashi, Japan

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Received 12 February 2016; accepted 26 April 2016; published 29 April 2016
ABSTRACT
We study multi-quark systems in lattice QCD. First, we revisit and summarize our accurate mass measurements of low-lying 5Q states with J = 1/2 and I = 0 in both positive- and negative-parity channels in anisotropic lattice QCD. The lowest positive-parity 5Q state is found to have a large mass of about 2.24 GeV after the chiral extrapolation. To single out the compact 5Q state from NK scattering states, we use the hybrid boundary condition (HBC), and find no evidence of the compact 5Q state below 1.75 GeV in the negative-parity channel. Second, we study the multi-quark potential in lattice QCD to clarify the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems. The 5Q potential V5Q for the QQ-
-QQ system is found to be well described by the “OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz”: The sum of the one-gluon-exchange (OGE) Coulomb term and the multi-Y-type linear term based on the flux-tube picture. The 4Q potential V4Q for the QQ-
system is also described by the OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz, when QQ and
are well separated. The 4Q system is described as a “two-meson” state with disconnected flux tubes, when the nearest quark and antiquark pair are spatially close. We observe a lattice-QCD evidence for the “flip-flop”, i.e., the fluxtube recombination between the connected 4Q state and the “two-meson” state. On the confinement mechanism, the lattice QCD results indicate the flux-tube-type linear confinement in multi-quark hadrons. Finally, we propose a proper quark-model Hamiltonian based on the lattice QCD results.
Keywords:
Lattice QCD, Multi-Quarks, Quark Confinement, Exotic Hadrons

1. Introduction
The Multi-quark physics is one of the new interesting fields in the hadron physics. So far, several new particles have been experimentally reported as the candidates of multi-quark hadrons.
At first, the candidates of pentaquark (5Q) baryons were reported: a narrow peak identified as the
was found at SPring-8 [1] , ITEP, JLab and ELSA [2] - [4] . The
has the baryon number
and the strangeness
, and hence it is a manifestly exotic baryon and is considered to be a pentaquark (
) in the valence-quark picture. Other pentaquark candidate, the
(
), was reported at CERN [5] ,
and also a charmed pentaquark, the
(
), was reported at HERA [6] . However, after high- energy experimental groups reported no evidence of the
[7] - [9] , these pentaquark candidates are no more credible experimentally at present. (For the recent experimental status of the
, see, e.g., Refs. [10] [11] ). Nevertheless, the very
gave an important trigger to open the new area of the multi- quark physics.
As the next important stage, the candidates of tetraquark (4Q) mesons were experimentally observed. The X(3872) [12] - [15] was found in the process of 










In the theoretical side, the quark model is one of the most popular models to describe hadrons. In the quark model, mesons and baryons are usually described as 






(
First, we investigate the mass and the parity of the 5Q system in lattice QCD. As for the parity assignment of the lowest-lying pentaquark, little agreement is achieved even in the theoretical side: the positive-parity assignment is supported by the chiral soliton model [19] and the diquark model [20] , while the negative-parity assignment is supported by the nonrelativistic quark model [21] , the QCD sum rule [22] and so on. For the exotic hadrons, most investigations have been done with model calculations, but these models were originally constructed only for ordinary hadrons. In fact, it is nontrivial that these models can describe the multi-quark system beyond the ordinary hadrons. To get solid information for the multi-quark systems, we study their properties directly from QCD by the lattice QCD simulation [23] [24] , which is the first-principle calculation and model independent.
Second, we study the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems in lattice QCD. The inter-quark force is one of the most important elementary quantities in hadron physics. Nevertheless, for instance, no body knows the exact form of the confinement force in the multi-quark systems directly from QCD. In fact, some hypothetical forms of the inter-quark potential have been used in almost all quark model calculations so far. Then, the lattice QCD study of the inter-quark interaction is quite desired for the study of the multi-quark systems. It presents the proper Hamiltonian in multi-quark systems and leads to a guideline to construct the QCD-based quark model. In this paper, to clarify the inter-quark force in the multi-quark system, we study the static multi-quark potential systematically in lattice QCD using the multi-quark Wilson loop. We investigate the three-quark (3Q) potential [25] - [28] , which is responsible to baryon properties, and perform the lattice-QCD study for the multi-quark potential, the tetraquark (4Q) and the pentaquark (5Q) potentials [29] - [33] .
We show in Figure 1 our global strategy to understand the hadron properties from QCD. One way is the direct lattice QCD calculations for the low-lying hadron masses and simple hadron matrix elements, although the wave function is unknown and the practically calculable quantities are severely limited. The other way is to construct the quark model from QCD. From the analysis of the inter-quark forces in lattice QCD, we extract the quark-model Hamiltonian. Through the quark model calculation, one can obtain the quark wave-function of hadrons and more complicated properties of hadrons including properties of excited hadrons.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present an accurate mass calculation of low-lying 5Q systems in anisotropic lattice QCD [34] [34] . In Section 3, we perform the systematic study of the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems [28] - [33] . Section 4 is devoted for the summary and concluding remarks.
2. Lattice QCD Study for Multi-Quark Hadrons
There have been many theoretical studies for multi-quark systems in the context of X(3872) and 


Also in lattice QCD, there is no consensus on the existence and the parity assignment of the lowest-lying pentaquark system. Two early works supported the negative-parity state for the 
In this section, we perform the accurate mass measurement of the 5Q system in anisotropic lattice QCD, and apply hybrid boundary condition [34] [43] to distinguish a compact resonance and a scattering state.
2.1. Strategy for High Precession Measurements in Lattice QCD
As a difficulty on the lattice study of multi-quarks, even if a compact multi-quark resonance state exists, there appears a mixture with several multi-hadron scattering states, even at the quenched level. For instance, in the channel of


Figure 1. Our global strategy to understand the hadron properties from QCD. One way is the direct lattice QCD calculations for the low-lying hadron masses and simple hadron matrix elements, although the wave function is unknown and the practically calculable quantities are severely limited. The other way is to construct the quark model from QCD. From the analysis of the inter-quark forces in lattice QCD, we extract the quark-model Hamiltonian. Through the quark model calculation, one can obtain the quark wave-function of hadrons and more complicated properties of hadrons including properties of excited hadrons.
2.1.1. Usage of Anisotropic Lattice QCD
We use the anisotropic lattice, where the temporal lattice spacing 

2.1.2. Usage of the Non-NK-type Interpolating Field Operator
We use a non-NK-type interpolating field to extract the 
would be important and effective. For instance, in Ref. [41] , the authors used the NK-type interpolating field and only obtained the NK scattering state instead of the compact 5Q state. However, their null result may be merely due to a small amount of the compact 5Q component in the NK-type interpolating field, because their calculation suffers from a large contamination of NK scattering states.
We adopt the non-NK-type interpolating field [22] ,

for the 5Q state with spin 



Equation (1) cannot be decomposed into N and K in the nonrelativistic limit and its coupling to the NK state is rather weak. Hence, the 5Q resonance state 
2.1.3. Application of the Hybrid Boundary Condition Method
To distinguish compact resonances from scattering states, we have proposed a useful method with the “hybrid boundary condition” (HBC) [34] [43] instead of the ordinary periodic boundary condition. In the HBC, we impose the it anti-periodic boundary condition for u, d quarks, and the periodic boundary condition for s-quarks, as shown in Table 1. By applying the HBC on a finite-volume lattice, the NK threshold is raised up, while the mass of a compact 5Q resonance 

In lattice QCD with the finite spatial volume




scattering state. The HBC imposes the anti-periodic boundary condition for u and d quarks and periodic boundary condition for s quark, while the periodic boundary condition is usually employed for all u, d, s quarks.
In the HBC, the net boundary conditions of both N(uud,udd) and K(

HBC, N and K have minimum momenta 




Figure 2. Schematic figures of the isotropic lattice (left) and the anisotropic lattice (right). On the anisotropic lattice, the temporal lattice spacing 

Table 1. The hybrid boundary condition (HBC) to distinguish a compact multi-quark resonance and an two-hadron scattering state for the 
Table 2. The net boundary condition for 



2.2. Lattice QCD Setup for the Pentaquark Mass
To generate gluon configurations, we use the standard plaquette action on the anisotropic lattice as [34]

with


For the quark part, we adopt the 

with the quark kernel 

where 









For the lattice QCD simulation, we use 










2.3. Lattice QCD Results for the
Now, using anisotropic lattice QCD, we perform the accurate mass measurement of the low-lying 5Q states with
Table 3. The lattice QCD results for the masses of






In Figure 3, we show the lattice QCD results [34] for the masses of lowest positive- and negative-parity 5Q states under the standard periodic boundary condition. After the chiral extrapolation, the lowest positive-parity 5Q state is found to be rather heavy as

On the other hand, we get a lower mass for the negative-parity 5Q state as 


To clarify whether the observed low-lying 5Q state is a compact 5Q resonance 

In Figure 4, we show the mass of the lowest-lying negative-parity 5Q state in lattice QCD with the standard periodic BC and the HBC at each 

As a lattice QCD result, the mass of the 5Q state is largely raised in the HBC in accordance with the NK threshold, which indicates that the lowest 5Q state observed on the lattice is merely an s-wave NK scattering state. In other words, if there exists a compact 5Q resonance 

To conclude, our lattice QCD calculation at the quenched level indicates absence of the low-lying compact 5Q resonance 


2.4. Discussion on Null Result of 
Now, let us consider the physical consequence of the present null result on the low-lying 5Q resonance 

First, the present lattice simulation has been done at the quenched level, where dynamical quark effects are suppressed. This quenching effect is not clear and then it may cause the 5Q resonance 
Figure 3. The lowest mass 

Figure 4. Comparison between the standard periodic boundary condition (Standard BC) and the Hybrid Boundary Condition (HBC) for the lowest mass of the negative-parity 5Q system, taken from Ref. [34] . At each

Second, we investigated the 5Q state with spin 






Third, we have used a localized 5Q interpolating field in this lattice QCD calculation. However, the actual 


the 


2.5. Necessity of the Wave Function of Multi-Quarks
So far, we have performed the direct mass measurement of 5Q states in lattice QCD, where the path integral over arbitrary states is numerically calculated on a supercomputer. In the path-integral formalism, however, it is rather difficult to extract the state information, such as the wave-function of the multi-quark state, and therefore only limited simple information can be obtained in the direct lattice-QCD calculation.
Actually, to distinguish the compact 5Q resonance 

Indeed, to get the wave function is very important to clarify the further various properties of the multi-quark state such as the underlying structure and the decay width, which cannot be obtained practically only with the direct lattice-QCD calculation.
Then, apart from the direct lattice-QCD calculation, we have to seek the way to obtain the proper wave function of the multi-quark state. To do so, we need a proper Hamiltonian for the multi-quark system based on QCD. One possible way in this direction is to construct the quark model from QCD, as was mentioned in Section 1. In the next section, we study the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems directly from QCD, and aim to construct the QCD-based quark-model Hamiltonian.
3. Inter-Quark Interaction in Multi-Quark Systems in Lattice QCD
In this section, we study the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems using lattice QCD [29] - [33] , and seek for the QCD-based quark-model Hamiltonian to describe multi-quark hadrons. The quark-model Hamiltonian consists of the kinetic term and the potential term, which is not known form QCD in multi-quark systems.
As for the potential at short distances, the perturbative one-gluon-exchange (OGE) potential would be appropriate, due to the asymptotic nature of QCD. For the long-range part, however, there appears the confinement potential as a typical non-perturbative property of QCD, and its form is highly nontrivial in the multi-quark system.
In fact, to clarify the confinement force in multi-quark systems is one of the essential points for the construction of the QCD-based quark-model Hamiltonian. Then, in this paper, we investigate the multi-quark potential in lattice QCD, with paying attention to the confinement force in multi-quark hadrons.
3.1. The Three-Quark Potential in Lattice QCD
So far, only for the simplest case of static 



with r being the inter-quark distance.
To begin with, we study three-quark (3Q) systems in lattice QCD to understand the structure of baryons at the quark-gluon level. Similar to the derivation of the 












within 1%-level deviation [25] - [28] [31] [33] . Here, 
To demonstrate the validity of the Y-Ansatz, we show in Figure 5 the lattice QCD data of the 3Q confine- ment potential


Figure 5. The lattice QCD result for the 3Q confinement potential




and
Here, we consider the physical meaning of the Y-Ansatz. Apart from an irrelevant constant, the Y-Ansatz, Equation (6), consists of the Coulomb term and the Y-type linear potential, which play the dominant role at short and long distances, respectively. The Coulomb term would originate from the one-gluon-exchange (OGE) process. In fact, at short distances, perturbative QCD is applicable, and therefore the inter-quark potential is expressed as the sum of the two-body one-gluon-exchange (OGE) Coulomb potential.
The appearance of the Y-type linear potential supports the flux-tube picture [50] - [53] at long distances, where there appears the color flux tube linking quarks inside hadrons with its length minimized. In particular, the confinement force in baryons corresponds to the Y-shaped flux tube, which implies existence of the three-body interaction in baryons.
In usual many-body systems, the main interaction is described by a two-body interaction and the three-body interaction is a higher-order contribution. In contrast, as is clarified by our lattice-QCD study, the quark confinement force in baryons is a genuinely three-body interaction [25] [26] , which is one of significant features of QCD. In fact, the appearance of the Y-type junction and the three-body confinement force reflect the SU(3) group structure in QCD, e.g., the number of color, 
In lattice QCD, a clear Y-type flux-tube formation is actually observed for spatially-fixed 3Q systems [31] [33] [54] . Thus, together with several other analytical and numerical studies [55] - [57] , the Y-Ansatz seems to be confirmed as the correct functional form of the static 3Q potential. This result indicates the color-flux-tube picture for baryons.
3.2. The OGE Coulomb Plus Multi-Y Ansatz
Now, we proceed to multi-quark systems. We first consider the theoretical form of the multi-quark potential, since we will have to analyze the lattice QCD data by comparing them with some theoretical Ansatz.
By generalizing the lattice QCD result of the Y-Ansatz for the three-quark potential, we propose the one-gluon-exchange (OGE) Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz [29] - [33] ,

for the potential form of the multi-quark system. Here, the confinement potential is proportional to the minimal total length 
In the following, we study the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems in lattice QCD, and compare the lattice QCD data with the theoretical form in Equation (7). Note here that the lattice QCD data are meaningful as primary data on the multi-quark system directly based on QCD, and do not depend on any theoretical Ansatz.
3.3. Formalism of the Multi-Quark Wilson Loop
Next, we formulate the multi-quark Wilson loop to obtain the multi-quark potential in lattice QCD [29] - [33] .
Similar to the derivation of the 


The tetraquark Wilson loop 


where




Here, 


The multi-quark Wilson loop physically means that a gauge-invariant multi-quark state is generated at 



The multi-quark potential is obtained from the vacuum expectation value of the multi-quark Wilson loop:

3.4. Lattice QCD Setup for the Multi-Quark Potential
Here, we briefly summarize the lattice QCD setup in this calculation. For the study of the multi-quark potential, the SU(3) lattice QCD simulation is done with the standard plaquette action at 



Figure 6. (a) The tetraquark Wilson loop 







In this calculation, the lattice spacing a is estimated as


simulation and 300 gauge configurations for the 4Q potential simulation. The smearing method is used for the enhancement of the ground-state component. We here adopt 

3.5. Lattice QCD Result of the Pentaquark Potential
We study the pentaquark potential 


described by the OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz, i.e., the sum of the OGE Coulomb term and the multi- Y-type linear term based on the flux-tube picture [29] [31] - [33] .
We show in Figure 8 the lattice QCD results of the 5Q potential 


In Figure 8, we add the theoretical curves of the OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz, where the coefficients 

parameter in the theoretical Ansatz apart from an irrelevant constant.) In Figure 8, one finds a good agreement between the lattice QCD data of 
In this way, the pentaquark potential 
Figure 7. A QQ-




Figure 8. Lattice QCD results of the pentaquark potential 





where 



3.6. Tetraquark Potential and Flip-Flop in Lattice QCD
We study the tetraquark potential 

1. When QQ and 

2. When the nearest quark and antiquark pair is spatially close, the 4Q potential 

We show in Figure 10 the lattice QCD results of the 4Q potential 


For large value of h compared with d, the lattice data seem to coincide with the solid curve of the OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz,

Figure 9. (a) A connected tetraquark (QQ-

Figure 10. Lattice QCD results of the tetraquark potential V4Q for symmetric planar 4Q configurations in the lattice unit, taken from Ref. [30] . The symbols denote the lattice QCD data. The solid curve denotes the OGE plus multi-Y Ansatz, and the dotted-dashed curve the two-meson Ansatz.
where 


For small h, the lattice data tend to agree with the dotted-dashed curve of the “two-meson” Ansatz, where the 4Q potential is described by the sum of two 

Thus, the tetraquark potential 
two-meson state. In other words, we observe a clear lattice QCD evidence of the “flip-flop”, i.e., the flux-tube recombination between the connected 4Q state and the two-meson state. This lattice result also supports the flux-tube picture for the 4Q system.
3.7. Proper Quark-Model Hamiltonian for Multi-Quarks
From a series of our lattice QCD studies [25] - [33] on the inter-quark potentials, the inter-quark potential is clarified to consist of the one-gluon-exchange (OGE) Coulomb part and the flux-tube-type linear confinement part in 
Furthermore, from the comparison among the


and the OGE result of the Coulomb coefficient A as

in Equations (5), (6), (12) and (13).
Here, the OGE Coulomb term is considered to originate from the OGE process, which plays the dominant role at short distances, where perturbative QCD is applicable. The flux-tube-type linear confinement would be physically interpreted by the flux-tube picture, where quarks and antiquarks are linked by the one-dimensional squeezed color-electric flux tube with the string tension
To conclude, the inter-quark interaction would be generally described by the sum of the short-distance two-body OGE part and the long-distance flux-tube-type linear confinement part with the universal string tension
Thus, based on the lattice QCD results, we propose the proper quark-model Hamiltonian 

where 


It is desired to investigate various properties of multi-quark hadrons with this QCD-based quark model Hamiltonian
4. Summary and Concluding Remarks
We have studied tetraquark and pentaquark systems in lattice QCD Monte Carlo simulations, motivated by the experimental discoveries of multi-quark candidates.
First, we have performed accurate mass calculations of low-lying 5Q states with 

Second, we have studied the multi-quark potential in lattice QCD to clarify the inter-quark interaction in multi-quark systems. We have found that the 5Q potential 



described by the OGE Coulomb plus multi-Y Ansatz, when QQ and 
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on the unpublished proceeding (hep-ph/0507187, talk by F.O.) at International Workshop on Quark Nuclear Physics, 22-24 Feb 2005. Phoenix Park, Korea. The lattice QCD Monte Carlo calculations were performed on supercomputers at Osaka University and at KEK.
Cite this paper
Fumiko Okiharu,Takumi Doi,Hiroko Ichie,Hideaki Iida,Noriyoshi Ishii,Makoto Oka,Hideo Suganuma,Toru T. Takahashi, (2016) Tetraquark and Pentaquark Systems in Lattice QCD. Journal of Modern Physics,07,774-789. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.78072
References
- 1. Nakano, T., et al., LEPS Collaboration (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 012002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.012002 - 2. Barmin, V.V., et al., DIANA Collaboration (2003) Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 66, 1715.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1611587 - 3. Stephanyan, S., et al., CLAS Collaboration (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 252001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.252001 - 4. Barth, J., et al., SAPHIR Collaboration (2003) Physics Letters, B572, 127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.08.019 - 5. Alt, C., et al., NA49 Collaboration (2004) Physical Review Letters, 92, Article ID: 042003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.042003 - 6. Aktas, A., et al., H1 Collaboration (2004) Physics Letters, B588, 17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.012 - 7. Schael, S., et al., ALEPH Collaboration (2004) Physics Letters, B599, 1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.021 - 8. Bai, J.X., et al., BES Collabolation (2004) Physical Review, D70, Article ID: 012004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.012004 - 9. Abt, I., et al., HERA-B Collaboration (2004) Physical Review Letters, 93, Article ID: 212003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.212003 - 10. Naruki, M. (2009) Lecture Notes in Physics, 781, 139, and Its References.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00961-7_6 - 11. Moritsu, M., et al., J-PARC E19 Collaboration (2014) Physical Review C, 90, Article ID: 035205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.035205 - 12. Choi, S.K., et al., Belle Collaboration (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 262001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001 - 13. Acosta, D., et al., CDF II Collaboration (2004) Physical Review Letters, 93, Article ID: 072001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.072001 - 14. Abazov, V.M., et al., D0 Collaboration (2004) Physical Review Letters, 93, Article ID: 162002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.162002 - 15. Aubert, B., et al., BABAR Collaboration (2004) Physical Review Letters, 93, Article ID: 041801.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.041801 - 16. Aubert, B., et al., BABAR Collaboration (2003) Physical Review Letters, 90, Article ID: 242001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.242001 - 17. Krokovny, P., et al., Belle Collaboration (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 262002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262002 - 18. Aaij, R., et al., LHCb Collaboration (2015) Physical Review Letters, 115, Article ID: 072001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001 - 19. Diakonov, D., Petrov, V. and Polyakov, M.V. (1997) Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 359, 305-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001 - 20. Jaffe, R.L. and Wilczek, F. (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 232003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.232003 - 21. Stancu, F. and Riska, D.O. (2003) Physics Letters B, 575, 242-248.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.061 - 22. Sugiyama, J., Doi, T. and Oka, M. (2004) Physics Letters B, 581, 167-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.12.018 - 23. Creutz, M. (1979) Physical Review Letters, 43, 553-556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.553
Creutz, M. (1980) Physical Review D, 21, 2308-2315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308 - 24. Rothe, H.J. (2012) Lattice Gauge Theories. 4th Edition, World Scientific, Singapore.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/8229 - 25. Takahashi, T.T., Matsufuru, H., Nemoto, Y. and Suganuma, H. (2001) Physical Review Letters, 86, 18-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.18 - 26. Takahashi, T.T., Suganuma, H., Nemoto, Y. and Matsufuru, H. (2002) Physical Review D, 65, Article ID: 114509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.114509 - 27. Takahashi, T.T. and Suganuma, H. (2003) Physical Review Letters, 90, Article ID: 182001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.182001
Takahashi, T.T. and Suganuma, H. (2004) Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 074506.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.074506 - 28. Sakumichi, N. and Suganuma, H. (2015) Physical Review D, 92, Article ID: 034511.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034511 - 29. Okiharu, F., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2005) Physical Review Letters, 94, Article ID: 192001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.192001 - 30. Okiharu, F., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, Article ID: 014505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.014505 - 31. Suganuma, H., Takahashi, T.T., Okiharu, F. and Ichie, H. (2005) AIP Conference Proceedings, 756, 123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1920939
Suganuma, H., Takahashi, T.T., Okiharu, F. and Ichie, H. (2005) Nuclear Physics B—Proceedings Supplements, 141, 92-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.12.015 - 32. Okiharu, F., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2005) The Static Pentaquark Potential in Lattice QCD. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pentaquark 04, SPring-8, Hyogo, 20-23 July 2004, 339-343.
- 33. Suganuma, H., Okiharu, F., Takahashi, T.T. and Ichie, H. (2005) Nuclear Physics A, 755, 399-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.098 - 34. Ishii, N., Doi, T., Iida, H., Oka, M., Okiharu, F. and Suganuma, H. (2005) Physical Review D, 71, Article ID: 034001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034001 - 35. Ishii, N., Doi, T., Iida, H., Oka, M., Okiharu, F. and Suganuma, H. (2005) Nuclear Physics A, 755, 467-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.057 - 36. Zhu, S.L. (2004) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 19, 3439-3469.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X04019676 - 37. Oka, M. (2004) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 112, 1-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.112.1 - 38. Csikor, F., Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D. and Kovacs, T.G. (2003) Journal of High Energy Physics, 2003, 070.
- 39. Sasaki, S. (2004) Physical Review Letters, 93, Article ID: 152001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.152001 - 40. Chiu, T.W. and Hsieh, T.H. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, Article ID: 034505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034505 - 41. Mathur, N., Lee, F.X., Alexandru, A., Bennhold, C., Chen, Y., Dong, S.J., Draper, T., Horváth, I., Liu, K.F., Tamhankar, S. and Zang, J.B. (2004) Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 074508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.074508 - 42. Takahashi, T.T., Umeda, T., Onogi, T. and Kunihiro, T. (2005) Physical Review D, 71, Article ID: 114509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.114509 - 43. Ishii, N., Doi, T., Nemoto, Y., Oka, M. and Suganuma, H. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, Article ID: 074503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.074503 - 44. Capstick, S., Page, P.R. and Roberts, W. (2003) Physics Letters B, 570, 185-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.08.010 - 45. Hosaka, A. (2003) Physics Letters B, 571, 55-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.07.067 - 46. Kanada-Enyo, Y., Morimatsu, O. and Nishikawa, T. (2005) Physical Review C, 71, Article ID: 045202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.045202 - 47. Karliner, M. and Lipkin, H.J. (2003) Physics Letters B, 575, 249-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.062 - 48. Bicudo, P. and Marques, G.M. (2004) Physical Review D, 69, Article ID: 011503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.011503 - 49. Sakumichi, N. and Suganuma, H. (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 111501(R).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.111501 - 50. Nambu, Y. (1974) Physical Review D, 10, 4262-4268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.4262 - 51. Kogut, J. and Susskind, L. (1975) Physical Review D, 11, 395-408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395 - 52. Casher, A., Neuberger, H. and Nussinov, S. (1979) Physical Review D, 20, 179-188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.179 - 53. Carlson, J., Kogut, J.B. and Pandharipande, V.R. (1983) Physical Review D, 27, 233-243.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.233
Carlson, J., Kogut, J.B. and Pandharipande, V.R. (1983) Physical Review D, 28, 2807-2817.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2807 - 54. Ichie, H., Bornyakov, V., Streuer, T. and Schierholz, G. (2003) Nuclear Physics A, 721, C899-C902.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01238-7 - 55. Kuzmenko, D.S. and Simonov, Y.A. (2003) Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 66, 950-954.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1577917 - 56. Bowman, P.O. and Szczepaniak, A.P. (2004) Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 016002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.016002 - 57. Cornwall, J.M. (2004) Physical Review D, 69, Article ID: 065013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.065013
Cornwall, J.M. (2005) Physical Review D, 71, Article ID: 056002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.056002











