Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.05 No.14(2015), Article ID:61921,15 pages
10.4236/apm.2015.514078
On 2 - 3 Matrix Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology
Joseph Dongho*, Epizitone Duebe-Abi, Shuntah Roland Yotcha
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).


Received 29 August 2015; accepted 13 December 2015; published 16 December 2015

ABSTRACT
The main objective of this paper is to provide the tool rather than the classical adjoint representation of Lie algebra; which is essential in the conception of the Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology. We introduce the notion of representation induced by a 2 - 3 matrix. We construct the corresponding Chevalley Eilenberg differential and we compute all its cohomological groups.
Keywords:
Lie Algebra, Cochain, 2 - 3 Matrix Chevalley Eilenberg, Cohomology

1. Introduction
This work is included in the domain of differential geometry which is the continuation of infinitesimal calculation. It is possible to study it due to the new techniques of differential calculus and the new family of topological spaces applicable as manifold. The study of Lie algebra with classical example puts in place with so many homological materials [1] -[3] (Lie Bracket, Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology...). The principal objective of this work is to introduce the notions of deformation of Lie algebra in the more general representation rather than the adjoint representation.
This work is base on 2 - 3 matrix Chevally Eilenberg Chohomology representation, in which our objective is to fixed a matrix representation and comes out with a representation which is different from the adjoint repre- sentation. Further, given a Lie algebra V, W respectively of dimension 2 and 3, we construct a linear map that will define a Lie algebra structure from a Lie algebra V into
by putting the commutator structure in place.
This does lead us to a fundamental condition of our 2 - 3 matrix Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology. We com- pute explicitly all the associated cohomological groups.
2. 2 - 3 Matrix Representation Theorem
We begin by choosing V to be a 2-dimensional vector space and W a 3-dimensional vector space, then we called our cohomology on a domain vector space V and codomain W a 2 - 3 matrix Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology. In what follow, we denoted for all
by
the space of i-multilinear skew symmetric map on V
with valor in W; we also denoted by
and
respectively the basis of V and W. We also suppose
that
is a representation of the Lie algebra
where
is the associated Lie structure.
2.1. Description of Cochain Spaces
Since element of
of
skew symmetric, then for all
, we have
[4] . Let
and
, we have
and





Then,
Lemma 1: If the



Proof. Since


Thus, we define an isomorphic map






Lemma 2: If


Proof. From the expression of an element



column matrix



then
since

Lemma 3: If



Proof. Since for every


2.2. Diagram of a Sequence of Linear Maps
According to the above results, we have the following diagram where we shall identify and define


Expression of

Expression of

Expression of

since

Definition of
i.e

Definition of
which is the matrix of



Definition of
which is the matrix of


2.3. Homological Differential
In this section, we are going to determine expressions of



Proposition 1: If


Proof. We assume that

By definition, we have that


Then by substituting equation (1) into (2),we have
by hypothesis.
Expression of
Let V be a two dimensional Lie-algebra with basis









Let

Therefore;
Since
Therefore,
Also, we have



So,
Therefore,
Now, we compute



By replacing the constants



Thus,

Hence,




Corollary 1: If
then


2.4. Fundametal Condition of 2 - 3 Matrix Chevalley-Eilenberg Cohomology
We now state the main hypothesis for our 2 - 3 matrix Chevalley-Eilenberg Cohomology, which we suppose that
i.e
i.e


This is an important tool in the construction of our 2 - 3 matrix cohomology differential complex.
2.5. Expression of
From the diagram,
where




Hence, the mapping

Corollary 2: If
then the mapping

The matrix




Proposition 2:
Proof. Since


Which gives us our 2 - 3 matrix Chevalley Eilenberg homological hypothesis

Remark 1: By straightforward computation, we have
2.6. Determination of the



iff



Now, we compute the

If

If

If

If

If

If

Thus, we have the image matrix as follows:
Next, we calculate the rank of the matrix



We now reduce the matrix


where




entries of row 1 by



Let






Let








we obtain the following matrix.

Hence we obtain the reduce row echelon form of

We wish to consider now the cases of the matrix

Rank 1: By setting each of the entries on row 2 and 3 of matrix A to zero, we obtain the rank of

Rank 2: By setting each of the entries on row 3 of matrix B to zero, we obtain the rank of

Proposition 3: if


then




Proposition 4: From matrix A, if





Proof. Since the





Proposition 5: From matrix B, if

and


Proof. Since the



By the dimension rank theorem, we have that

Proposition 6: if



and the


Proof. Since the





Now, we compute our quotient spaces of the 2 - 3 matrix Chevalley Eilenberg cohomology which are



For
Case 1:


For
Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 4:


Case 5:


Case 6:


Case 7:


Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 4:


Case 5:


Case 6:


Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 4:


Case 5:


Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 4:


Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 1:


Case 2:


For
Case 1:


Case 2:


Case 3:


Case 4:


We suggest that further research in this direction is to carry out the deformation on the Cohomological spaces



Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor and the referee for their comments.
Cite this paper
JosephDongho,EpizitoneDuebe-Abi,Shuntah RolandYotcha, (2015) On 2 - 3 Matrix Chevalley Eilenberg Cohomology. Advances in Pure Mathematics,05,835-849. doi: 10.4236/apm.2015.514078
References
- 1. Chevalley, C. and Eilenberg, S. (1948) Cohomology Theory of Lie Groups and Lie Algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 63, 85-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1948-0024908-8 - 2. Nijenhuis, A. and Richardson, R.W. (1967) Deformation of Lie Algebra Structures. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, No. 1.
- 3. Hochschild, G., Kostant, B. and Rosenberg, A. (1962) Differential Forms On Regular Affine Algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 102, 383-408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1962-0142598-8 - 4. Goze, M. (1986) Perturbations of Lie Algebra Structures. In: Hazewinkel, M. and Gerstenhaber, M., Eds., Deformation Theory of Lie Algebra and Structures and Application, NATO ASI Series, Vol. 247, Springer, Netherlands, 265-355.
- 5. Hefferon, J. (2001) Linear Algebra. Saint Michaels College Colchester, Vermont.
- 6. Giarlet, P. (1998) Introduction à l’analyse numrique matricielle et l’optimisation. DUMOD.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.







































































































