Journal of Diabetes Mellitus
Vol.06 No.03(2016), Article ID:69813,4 pages
10.4236/jdm.2016.63023

Evaluation of the Knowledge and Practice about Diabetes Mellitus of Adult Population in Porto Novo (Benin)

Finangnon Armand Wanvoegbe1*, Kouessi Anthelme Agbodandé2, Arnaulde Amoussou-Guenou Fandi3, Marius Boko1, Adébayo Alassani2, Annelie Kerekou2, Daniel Amoussou-Guenou2

1Departmental Teaching Hospital of “Oueme-Plateau” (CHUD-OP) in Porto-Novo, Porto-Novo, Benin

2National Teaching Hospital of Cotonou (CNHU), Cotonou, Benin

3Clinic of Akpakpa in Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 24 July 2016; accepted 14 August 2016; published 17 August 2016

ABSTRACT

Background: Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common non-communicable diseases in the world. The aim of our study was to assess the level of knowledge of the adult population of Porto-Novo on clinical manifestations and complications of diabetes mellitus. Methods: It is a descriptive cross- sectional study conducted under STEP wise approach. It took place from June 1 to July 28, 2014. Results: A total of 240 subjects were included in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 46.07 years ± 12.63 years, ranging from 25 to 80 years. Subjects age between 35 - 45 years are the most represented. Women were mostly represented 162 against 78 men respectively 67.5% against 32.5% with sex ratio of 0.48. The majority of the subjects were scholar (73.3%). For clinical manifestations of diabetes mellitus, 64.2% of subjects had quoted polyuria, asthenia 57.5%, 56.7% weight loss. Polydipsia and polyphagia were less familiar with, respectively, 27.5% and 23.3%. Regarding the complications of diabetes, diabetic foot and coma were the best known, respectively, 78.8% and 58.8%. Nephropathy (45.0%), 39.6% retinopathy and neuropathy (21.7%) were the least known. The prevalence of physical inactivity in this study population was 95.0%. It was 98.1% in women versus 88.5% for men. Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus, whose prevalence is steadily increasing, is not yet well known in our population.

Keywords:

Knowledge, Diabetes, Porto-Novo

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue in the world by its increasing frequency, morbidity, mortality and its economic costs [1] . It is one of the most common non-communicable diseases worldwide [2] [3] . In 2013 Diabetes mellitus affects 381.8 million people in the world according to estimations by the IDF [4] . IDF expected this number to increase to 591.9 million in 2035; an increase of 55.0% [4] . If the prevalence and progression of diabetes mellitus are well understood in Western countries, this is not the case in developing one, because of lack of reliable data [5] and particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa [6] . In Benin, various investigations have been conducted. Thus the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was: 1.1% in 2001 [7] and 2.6% in 2007 nationally [8] . Therefore, various public awareness campaigns have been organized by the National Program against Non Communicable Diseases (PNLNMT). The aim of our study was to assess the level of knowledge of the adult population in Porto Novo on clinical manifestations and complications of diabetes mellitus. Porto-Novo is the capital of the Republic of Benin which is a country of the West Africa.

2. Methods

It is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted according to STEP wise approach recommended by the WHO to screening and monitoring of risk factors for non-communicable diseases [9] . It was a random sampling technique, stratified clusters. It took place from June 1 to July 28, 2014. The target population consisted of adults of five townships of Porto-Novo were included in the study, subjects aged at least 25 years to 80 years at most, regardless of sex, residing in Porto-Novo and consenting. These people were subjected to a questionnaire prepared for this purpose. The required number of participants obtained by Schwartz formula was 211. The number found was increased by 10% to account for non-respondents, giving a size of 232 subjects. A total of 240 subjects were included in the study. HBP was defined as BP equal or higher than 140/90 mm Hg. Obesity was defined as BMI equal or higher than 30 kg/m2.

The collected data were analyzed with Excel and the EPI INFO software version 3.5.3.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of the Population

The mean age of the subjects was 46.07 years ± 12.63 years, ranging from 25 to 80 years. Age subjects between 35 - 45 years are the most represented.

Women were mostly represented 162 against 78 men respectively 67.5% against 32.5% with sex ratio of 0.48.

Traders were most represented (46.7%) in this population (Table 1).

The majority of the subjects were scholar (73.3%). 28.4% of them are obese and 3.3% have diabetes in their family.

3.2. Evaluation of Knowledge of the Respondents on Diabetes Mellitus

Cardinal symptoms of diabetes mellitus:

Polyuria

Table 1. Distribution of subjects according to their occupation.

64.2% of subjects had cited as a symptom of diabetes mellitus.

Asthenia

It was cited by 57.5% of subjects.

Emaciation

56.7% of subjects had itemized it.

Polydipsia

72.5% of the subjects were unaware, so only 27.5% of the subjects knew it as a sign of diabetes.

Polyphagia

It was cited by 23.3% of the respondents.

3.3. The Most Frequent Complications of Diabetes Mellitus

The diabetic foot

This is the most known complication by the surveyed subjects (78.8%).

Coma

58.8% had quoted a coma from complications of diabetes mellitus.

Nephropathy

It was cited by 45.0% of subjects.

Retinopathy

39.6% of subjects had quoted.

Neuropathy

The majority of subjects in our study (78.3%) were unaware of.

3.4. Feeding Behavior

The average number of meals consumed per day was 2.7 (3 meals) ± 0.59 with extremes ranging from 1 to 5 meals.

Snacking was noted in 65.0% (n = 156) in the overall population.

The fruits are consumed by 91.3% of subjects with an average frequency of consumption of fruit per week of 3.31 (3 times/week) ± 2.31, with a range from 1 to 14 times.

For vegetables, they are consumed by 95.0% of subjects with an average frequency of vegetables consumption per week of 1.83 (2 times/week) ± 1.2, with a range of 1 to 7 times.

3.5. Prevalence of Physical Inactivity (Sedentary Lifestyle)

The average frequency of sport per week is 1.92 times (2 times/week) ± 1.4 with extremes ranging from 1 to 7 times.

The prevalence of physical inactivity in this study population was 95.0% (n = 228). It was 98.1% in women versus 88.5%.

4. Discussion

Regarding the clinical manifestations of diabetes mellitus, polyuria is the most known symptom (64.2% of subjects had cited as a symptom of diabetes mellitus) followed by asthenia (cited by 57.5% of subjects), weight loss (56.7%). Polydipsia and polyphagia are the least known symptoms (27.5% and 23.3% polydipsia for polyphagia). We can therefore understand that the clinical manifestations of diabetes mellitus are not yet well known by the people of Porto-Novo, despite the various awareness campaigns that apparently have not yet reached the majority of the population.

This lack of knowledge about diabetes was also noted by Katchunga P.B. et al. in South Kivu [10] . Tessaro I. et al. had the same notice in an Appalachian population [11] .

Regarding the complications, diabetic foot is the most known complication (78.8%) because it is the most remarkable complication. The idea that a wound in a diabetic patient takes a long time to heal is very generally spread. Acute complications are also known by more than half of our study population (58.8%). Other complications are less known.

The average number of meals consumed per day was 2.7 (3 meals) ± 0.59 with extremes ranging from 1 to 5 meals. But snacking was noted in 65.0% in the overall population. That percentage is so high and proves that our population needs an education about the feeding behavior.

The fruits are consumed by 91.3% of subjects with an average frequency of consumption of fruit per week of 3.31 (3 times/week) ± 2.31. Vegetables are consumed by 95.0% of subjects with an average frequency of vegetables consumption per week of 1.83 (2 times/week) ± 1.2. That consumption is not enough and should be further encouraged through awareness campaigns.

The prevalence of physical inactivity in the study population was 95.0% (n = 228). It was 98.1% in women versus 88.5%. This high prevalence of inactivity was also found in Cotonou by Kerekou A. et al. in 2011 [12] , which show the lack of awareness of our population on diabetes mellitus prevention.

This study was limited in Porto-Novo and in view of these results, it is important that it be done at national level.

5. Conclusion

Diabetes mellitus, whose prevalence is steadily increasing, is not yet well known in our very inactive population. It is therefore imperative to intensify sensitization and campaigns actions to slow the progression of the disease, which is globally a public health issue now.

Cite this paper

Finangnon Armand Wanvoegbe,Kouessi Anthelme Agbodandé,Arnaulde Amoussou-Guenou Fandi,Marius Boko,Adébayo Alassani,Annelie Kerekou,Daniel Amoussou-Guenou, (2016) Evaluation of the Knowledge and Practice about Diabetes Mellitus of Adult Population in Porto Novo (Benin). Journal of Diabetes Mellitus,06,204-207. doi: 10.4236/jdm.2016.63023

References

  1. 1. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R. and King, H. (2004) Global Prevalence of Diabetes: Estimates for the Year 2000 and Projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27, 1047-1053.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047

  2. 2. Shaw, J.E., Sicree, R.A. and Zimmet, P.Z. (2010) Global Estimates of the Prevalence of Diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87, 4-14.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007

  3. 3. Whiting, D.R., Guariguata, L., Weil, C. and Shaw, J. (2011) IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global Estimates of the Prevalence of Diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94, 311-321.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029

  4. 4. Guarignata, L., Whiting, D.R., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., Hambleton, I., Cho, N.H., et al. (2013) Global Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence in Adults for 2013 and Projection for 2035 for the IDF Diabetes Atlas. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 103, 137-149.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002

  5. 5. Labie, D. (2007) Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa. Médecine Sciences (Paris), 23, 320-322.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2007233320

  6. 6. Mbanya, J.C., Motala, A.A., Sobngwi, E., Assah, F.K. and Enoru, S.T. (2010) Diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa. The lancet, 375, 2254-2266.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60550-8

  7. 7. Djrolo, F., Amoussou-Guénou, K.D., Zannou, D.M., Houinato, D., Ahouandogbo, F., et al. (2003) Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Benin. Louvain Médical, 122, S258-S262.

  8. 8. Final Report of the STEPS Survey in Benin. (2008) Direction Nationale de la Projection Sanitaire, Programme Nationale de Lutte contre les Maladies Non Transmissibles.

  9. 9. World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual (2005) The WHO STEP Wise Approach to Surveillance of Chronic Disease Risk Factors—4. Surveillance Manual WHO STEPS. World Health Organization, Geneva.

  10. 10. Katchunga, P.B., Malanda, B., Mweze, M.C., Dupont, B., M’Buyamba-Kabangu, J.R., et al. (2012) Knowledge of the General Population on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Revue d’épidémiologie et de santé publique, 60, 141-147.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2011.10.005

  11. 11. Tessaro, I., Smith, S.L. and Rye, S. (2005) Knowledge and Perception of Diabetes in a Population of Appalachia. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2, 1-9.
    http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/apr/04_0098_fr.htm

  12. 12. Kerekou, A., Azon Kouanou, A., Bocovo, M., Amoussou-Guenou, D., Djrolo, F., et al. (2014) Prevalence of Physical Activity in External Medicine at CNHU/HKM in Cotonou. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 61, 592-596.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.