Advances in Microbiology
Vol.06 No.03(2016), Article ID:64458,7 pages

Low Efficiency of the Commonly Prescribed Drugs against Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter Species as the Causative Agents of Blood Stream Infection in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

Aleksey Shatalov1, Yaari Shilo2, Rizeq Nakhash3, Dennis Zhdanov4

1Department of Microbiology, La Paz Medical Center, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

2Intern Medicine Department, La Paz Medical Center, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

3Department of Neonatology and Pediatria, La Paz Medical Center, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

4Intensive Care Unit Department, La Paz Medical Center, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 14 February 2016; accepted 11 March 2016; published 14 March 2016


The prevalence of multi drug resistant gram-negative bacteria to commonly first line drugs in blood is a serious problem in Equatorial Guinea and other world. This is the first study describing antibiotic resistance analysis of blood stream infection in Equatorial Guinea. Our study presents alarming rate of inefficiency of the most commonly prescribed drugs to treatment Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter species isolates as the most frequency etiologic agents in blood stream infection. Out of 1849 blood culture the bacterial etiological agents were isolated from 196 (10.6%) samples. E. coli (n = 22), K. pneumonia (n = 39) and Acinetobacter (n = 17) represent 71.6% of all gram negative bacterial isolates. Almost all isolates of K. pneumonia and Acinetobacter sp. (92.1% and 100%, respectively) and about 50% of E. coli strains possessed extended-spectrum β-lactamase activity. Alarming level of multi drug resistant gram negative strains was observed. E. coli and K. pneumonia and Acinetobacter isolates demonstrated low sensitivity to all commonly prescribed drugs such as Ampicillin, Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, Doxycycline, Gentamycin Amoxicicline/Clavulanic Acid, Cefuroxime, Ciprofloxacine. It is especially worth noting the low efficiency of third generation cephalosporins (Cefrtiaxon) against Acinetobacter and Klebsiella with their resistance rate of 94.7% and 100% respectively. Moreover, the alarming level of low sensitivity to Piperacilin/Tazobactam of K. pneumonia (22%) and Acinetobacter (29.4%) was been found. The 17.6% of Acinetobacter isolated was carbomenem resistant. Just Imipenem and Amikacin were the most sensitive drug against these bacterial strains.


Bacteremia, Multi Drug Resistance, ESBL, Gram Negative Rods

1. Introduction

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are among the most serious medical problems with high mortality and morbidity rates in the world and especially in Africa [1] - [4] . Gram-negative bacilli such as Enterobacteriaceae and non- fermenting gram-negative bacilli are the leading cause of bloodstream infection and responsible for the high mortality rates. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing strains are the most important problem as etiology of bacteremia [5] -[8] . The increasing incidence of infections due to antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli in recent years is of great concern [9] [10] . Rapid diagnosis, identification of the causative agents of bacteremia and understanding resistance patterns may help guide effective empirical antibiotic therapy.

In Equatorial Guinea, the etiology of bloodstream infections is still not clear. The problem of antibiotic resistance is compounding because of overuse and misuse of antibiotics. We performed this prospective study in order to identify the most common causative agent of bacteremia and determine their antibiotic resistant pattern.

2. Subjects and Methods

The study was conducted at La Paz Medical Center from July 2013 to January 2016. La Paz Medical Center is a 150 beds hospital situated in the North of Bioko Island near the Malabo city, Equatorial Guinea.

During study period 1849 blood samples were obtained from patients admitted in different departments. These samples were quickly recorded and processed according to standard protocols for blood culture.

2.1. Samples Processing

The blood samples were inoculated into BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic/Anaerobic F medium and incubated in the BACTEC 9050 (Becton-Dickenson, USA) automat system at 35˚C for 5 days. Positive cultures were inoculated on Triptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood (TSAB), Mac Conkey’s agar and Chocolate agar (HyLabs Ltd.) by spread plate technique [11] . The isolated bacteria were then identified by using Gram Staining procedure and their biochemical characteristics using Remelrap ID system kits (Rap ID ONE, Rap ID NF Plus).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar according to the Guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (GCLSI) [12] [13] .

Different families of antibiotics (discs obtained from OXOID, UK) were: Cephems (cefuroxime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg)); Penicillins (Ampicillin (10 μg)); Beta-lactam + inhibitor (Amoxicillin/ Clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), Piperacilin/Tazobactam (100/10 μg)); Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin (10 μg), Amikacin (30 μg)); Carbapenemes (Imipenem (10 μg)).

Confirmation of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) activity was performed by the standard double-disc synergy testing of Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime in the present and absent of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid.

Multi Drug Resistant bacteria are defined as resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics [14] .

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Office Excel 2003.

3. Results

3.1. Epidemiology of Blood Stream Infection

During the study period, from July 2013 to January 2016 a total of 1849 blood cultures from different wards were collected: 417 (22.6%) from neonates, 623 (33.7%) from children and 783 (43.7%) from adult. The age of patients was ranged from 0 year to 90 years. Bacterial or fungal pathogens were detected in 196 (10.6%) of cultures; of these 109 (55.6%) were Gram negative, 76 (38.8%) were Gram positive an 11 (5.6%) were yeasts (Table 1). For the Gram Negative rods, Klebsiella pneumonia was the most frequent isolate 39 (35.8%) followed by Escherichia coli 22 (20.2%), Acinetobacter species 17 (15.6%). These isolates represent 71.6% of all Gram Negative bacterial strains. Therefore, antibiotic resistance rates were performed specifically these three strains.

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci 49 (%) was the predominant Gram Positive cocci isolated from blood culture and was considered as probable contaminants from skin during the process of venipuncture. Klebciella pneumonia was the most causative agent of bacteremia in neonates, whereas Acinetobacter and E. coli were prevalent bacterial pathogens in bloodstream infection of adult patients. The prevalence of bacterial isolate in different age groups showed in Table 2.

3.2. Antibiotic Resistance

Very high level of resistance to the commonly used antimicrobial drug was observed. The comparison of antibiotic resistance/susceptibility rates was performed specifically for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter sp. (Tables 3-5).

K. pneumoniae, Acinetobacter sp. and E. coli exhibited the highest percentage resistance to the Ampicillin (100%), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (88.2%, 100%, and 88.9% respectively) and Doxycycline (90%, 66.7%, 82.4% respectively). More than 80% of K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter sp. isolates were resistant to

Table 1. Prevalence of organisms isolated from blood cultures.

Table 2. The prevalence of K. pneumoniae, E. coli and Acinetobacter sp. in the different age groups of patients.

Table 3. Antibiotic resistance rates for K. pneumoniae isolates from blood cultures.

Table 4. Antibiotic resistance rates for E. coli isolates from blood cultures.

Table 5. Antibiotic resistance rates for Acinetobacter sp. isolates from blood cultures.

Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid. About 60% of all isolates possessed resistance to fluoroquinolones (Ciprofloxacin). Alarming level of high rate resistant isolates of K. pneumonia (41%) and Acinetobacter sp. (29.4%) was found to Piperacilin/Tazobactam. 89.7% of K. pneumoniae isolates showed high rate of resistance to Gentamicin while Acinetobacter sp. and E. coli were 64.7% and 50.0% resistant respectively.

Among the antimicrobials testing, third generation cephalosporins (Cefrtiaxon) demonstrated the inefficiency against Acinetobacter and K. pneumoniae with their resistance rate of 94.7% and 100% respectively. The most active drug against K.pneumoniae, E. coli and Acinetobacter sp. was Imipenem, followed by Amikacin.

Based on their resistance pattern, the 100% of K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter, 72.7% of E. coli strains were Multi Drug Resistant organisms. The 92.1% (n = 35) isolates of K. pneumonia, 100% (n = 17) of Acinetobacter sp. And 59.1% (n = 13) of E. coli were Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing strains.

4. Discussion

According to the Antimicrobial Resistance Global Report of WHO the information and data about antibiotic resistance situation obtained from the most African countries is still not enough or clear [15] . Blood culture is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections [2] . Rapid and correct choice of the antibiotic enables rapid cure of the patient and the saving of the patient’s life.

In our study, out of 196 (10.6%) cultures were positive. This rate of positive samples from this study was lower than figures from previous studies [16] -[19] in Tanzania (13.4%), Central Africa (15.9%), Ethiopia (28%) and Zanzibar (14%). The difference in rates of positive samples can be explained by the differences in blood culture system, location and health situation in the region, capacity of hospital, epidemiological difference of the etiological agents [1] [3] [6] [16] [17] [20] .

The antimicrobial resistance profile of K. pneumoniae, E. coli and Acinetobacter species isolates in our study revealed a generally higher resistance rate than reported in African studies [1] [16] [20] . The previous studies [1] [9] [21] [22] show the efficiency of Gentamicin against Gram Negative rods, but our data show a lower effectiveness of this antibiotic for treatment of K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter isolates with their rate of resistance 87.2% and 64.7% respectively. For E. coli, Acinetobacter and K. pneumoniae, we reported high resistance (about 60%) to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin) which limit the available oral treatment.

Multiple drug resistant Gram Negative bacteria are often associated with hospitals in developed countries where overuse/misuse of large amount of cephalosporin without special control. This antibiotic induces the formation of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) bacterial strains [23] - [25] . More over resistant organisms isolated during therapy to one cephalosporin may also demonstrate reduced susceptibility to other antibiotics not necessary the same chemical class [13] [26] . One explanation is spreading of antibiotic resistance by horizontal transfer of genetic material from one bacterial strain to an others. Antibiotic resistance genes may be transferred by different mechanisms of conjugation, transformation or transduction [9] [10] [27] . This lead to increase number of microorganisms with acquired resistance to second and third generation cephalosporins. [23] [26] [28] Our study have shown the highest level of resistance of K. pnemoniae (97.4%) and Acinetobacter sp. (100%) isolates to 3rd generation cephalosporins. Moreover, almost all isolates of K. pneumonia and Acinetobacter sp. (92.1% and 100% respectively) and about 50% of E. coli strains were Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing strains. These results alarming and show how rapidly this phenomenon of Extended-Spectrum β- Lactamase (ESBL) strains spreads all over the world [7] [9] [15] . One way to decrease a high rate of Extended- Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria is completely eliminate the use of cephalosporins as the first line drug and their replacement for a combination of Piperacillin or carbopenems with an aminoglycosides [7] [9] [26] [29] . Just Imipenem and Amikacin in our study possessed high efficiency against ESBL-producing gram negative bacteria such as E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter and may serve as prefered treatment. These results correlated with other studies in other part of the world [7] [9] [10] [15] .

5. Conclusion

This is the first study describing antibiotic resistance analysis of blood stream infection in Equatorial Guinea. Our study shows alarming inefficiency of the commonly prescribed drugs against Extended-Spectrum β-Lact- amase (ESBL) E. coli, K. pneumonia and Acinetobacter strains as causative agents of bacteremia. Just Imipenem followed by Amikacin was the most sensitive drugs.


The author expresses gratitude to Ms. Yardena Ovadia, Dr. Daniel Sima, Prof. Ami Ballin and all the staff of the La Paz Medical Center for their help and support.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Cite this paper

AlekseyShatalov,YaariShilo,RizeqNakhash,DennisZhdanov, (2016) Low Efficiency of the Commonly Prescribed Drugs against Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter Species as the Causative Agents of Blood Stream Infection in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea. Advances in Microbiology,06,162-168. doi: 10.4236/aim.2016.63016


  1. 1. Reddy, E.A., Shaw, A.V. and Crump, J.A. (2010) Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infections in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 10, 417-432.

  2. 2. Laupland, K.B. (2012) Defining the Epidemiology of Bloodstream Infections: The “Gold Standard” of Population-Based Assessment. Epidemiology and Infection, 141, 2149-2157.

  3. 3. Laupland, K.B. and Church, D.L. (2014) Population-Based Epidemiology and Microbiology of Community Onset Bloodstream Infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 27, 647-664.

  4. 4. Bates, D.W., Pruess, K.E. and Lee, T.H. (1995) How Bad Are Bacteremia and Sepsis? Outcomes in a Cohort with Suspected Bacteremia. Archives of Internal Medicine, 155, 593-598.

  5. 5. Tuon, F.F., Kruger, M., Terreri, M., Penteado-Filho, S.R. and Gortz, L. (2011) Klebsiella ESBL Bacteremia-Mortality and Risk Factors. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 15, 594-598.

  6. 6. McKay, R. and Bamford, C. (2015) Community-versus Healthcare-Acquired Bloodstream Infections at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. South African Medical Journal, 105, 363-369.

  7. 7. Paterson, D.L. and Bonomo, R.A. (2005) Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases: A Clinical Update. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 18, 657-686.

  8. 8. Kang, C.-I., Kim, S.-H., Park, W.B., et al. (2005) Bloodstream Infections Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Risk Factors for Mortality and Impact of Inappropriate Initial Antimicrobial Therapy on Outcome. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 49, 760-766.

  9. 9. Rawat, D. and Nair, D. (2010) Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in Gram Negative Bacteria. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 2, 263-274.

  10. 10. Shaikh, S., Fatima, J., Shakil, S., Rizvi, S.M.D. and Kamal, M.A. (2015) Antibiotic Resistance and Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases: Types, Epidemiology and Treatment. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22, 90-101.

  11. 11. Murray, P., Baron, E., Jorgensen, J., Pfaller, M. and Washington, R. (2003) Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 8th Edition, American Society for Microbiology Press.

  12. 12. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2014) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100-S24, Vol. 34, No. 1.

  13. 13. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2013) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100-S23, Vol. 33, No. 1.

  14. 14. Magiorakos, A., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R., et al. (2012) Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 18, 268-281.

  15. 15. WHO (2014) Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance.

  16. 16. Moyo, S., Aboud, S., Kasubi, M. and Maselle, S.Y. (2010) Bactereia Isolated from Bloodsrtream Infections at a Tertiary Hospital in Dar es Saalam, Tanzania—Antimicrobial Resistance of Isolates. South Africa Medical Journal, 100, 835-838.

  17. 17. Bahwere, P., Levy, J., Hennart, P., et al. (2001) Community-Acquired Bacteremia among Hospitalized Children in Rural Central Africa. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 5, 180-188.

  18. 18. Wasihun, A.G., Wlekidan, L.N., Gebremariam, S.A., et al. (2015) Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Blood Culture Isolates among Febrile Patients in Mekelle Hospital, Northern Ethiopia. SpringerPlus, 4, 314.

  19. 19. Onken, A., Said, A.K., Jorstad, M., Jenum, P.A. and Blomberg, B. (2015) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Microbes Causing Bloodstream Infections in Unguja, Zanzibar. PLoS ONE, 10, e0145632.

  20. 20. Asrat, D. and Amanuel, Y.W. (2001) Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Bacteria Isolates from Blood Culture in Tikur Anbassa Hospital, Addia Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal, 39, 97-104.

  21. 21. Acquah, S.E., Lawrence, Q., Sagoe, K., et al. (2013) Susceptibility of Bacterial Etiological Agents to Commonly-Used Antimicrobial Agents in Children with Sepsis at the Tamale Teaching Hospital. BMC Infectious Diseases, 13, 89.

  22. 22. Nwadioha, S., Nwokedi, E., Odimayo, M., Okwori, E. and Kashibu, E. (2009) Bacterial Isolates in Blood Cultures of Children with Suspected Septicaemia in Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. The Internet Journal of Infectious Diseases, 8, 1-5.

  23. 23. Follath, F., Costa, E., Thommen, A., Frei, R., Burdeska, A. and Meyer, J. (1987) Clinical Consequences of Development of Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 6, 446-450.

  24. 24. Gentry, L.O. (1991) Bacterial Resistance. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 22, 379-388.

  25. 25. Asensio, A., Oliver, A., González-Diego, P., et al. (2000) Outbreak of a Multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain in an Intensive Care Unit: Antibiotic Use as Risk Factor for Colonization and Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 30, 55-60.

  26. 26. Dancer, S.J. (2001) The Problem with Cephalosporins. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 48, 463-478.

  27. 27. Alekshun, M.N. and Levy, S.B. (2007) Molecular Mechanisms of Antibacterial Multidrug Resistance. Cell, 128, 1037-1050.

  28. 28. Murray, P.R., Granich, G.G., Krogstad, D.J. and Niles, A.C. (1983) In-Vivo Selection of Resistance to Multiple Cephalosporins by Enterobacter Cloacae. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 147, 590.

  29. 29. Ballow, C.H. and Schentag, J.J. (1992) Trends in Antibiotic Utilization and Bacterial Resistance. Report of the National Nosocomial Resistance Surveillance Group. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 15, 37-42.