T. SENO, G. H. VAN DOORN
Open Access
826
perimental trial lasted only a short time, there were repeated
exposures and the autonomic response is quick, especially if
trials are repeated with short inter-trial intervals. That said, for
autonomic responses to have been a confounding variable the
reported influence of temperature on vection would have to be
explainable having found that autonomic responses occurred in
the 26˚C - 27˚C temperature/downward motion (upward vection)
condition but not in the 26˚C - 27˚C temperature/upward mo-
tion (downward vection) condition, and that this increased the
perceived strength of vection in the former condition. There is
no evidence to support such a view.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the existence of a new
crossmodal correspondence, namely an association between tem-
perature and directional up; vection modulated perceived tem-
perature, and was modulated by actual temperature. As Parise
and Spence (2012) argue, this correspondence might reflect the
natural correlation between physical properties of the world, i.e.
warmer air moves upwards relative to cooler air.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Program to Disseminate Ten-
ure Tracking System, MEXT, Japan.
REFERENCES
Cavanagh, P., MacLeod, D. I., & Anstis, S. M. (1987). Equiluminance:
Spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive
cones. The Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 1428-1438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.001428
Fischer, M. H., & Kornmuller, A. E. (1930). Optokinetic ausgeloste Be-
wegungs-wahrnehmungen und optokinetinetisher Nystagmus. Jour-
nal of Comparative Neurology, 41, 273-308.
Fukuda, H., & Seno, T. (2011). Shrinking neighbors: A quantitative
examination of the ‘Shrinking Building’ illusion. Seeing Perceiving,
24, 541-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187847611X603756
Fukuda, H., & Seno, T. (2012). Healin’ groovy: Movement affects the
appearance of the Healing Grid Illusion. Perception, 41, 243-246.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p7132
Marks, L. E. (2004). Cross-modal interaction in speeded classification.
In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multi-
sensory processes (pp. 85-105). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (2000). Cross-modal interaction between
vision and touch: The role of synesthetic correspondence. Perception,
29, 745-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2984
Miles, L. K., Karpinska, K., Lumsden, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). The
meandering mind: Vection and mental time travel. PLoS One, 5,
e10825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010825
Palmisano, S., & Chan, A. Y. (2004). Jitter and size effects on vection
are immune to experimental instructions and demands. Perception,
33, 987-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5242
Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual crossmodal correspon-
dences and sound symbolism: A study using the Implicit Association
Test. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 319-333.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6
Pilcher, J. J., Nadler, E., & Busch, C. (2002). Effects of hot and cold
temperature exposure on performance: A meta-analytic review. Er-
gonomics, 45, 682-698.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130210158419
Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005).
Influence of auditory cues on the visually-induced self-motion illu-
sion (circular vection) in virtual reality. In M. Slater (Ed.), Proceed-
ings of the 8th International Workshop on Presence 2005 (pp. 49-57).
London: University College London.
Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., & Rieser, J. J. (2008). Auditory self-mo-
tion illusions (“circular vection”) can be facilitated by vibrations and
the potential for actual motion. In S. N. Spence (Ed.), Proceedings of
the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visuali-
zation 2008 (pp. 147-54). New York, NY: The Association for Com-
puting Machinery.
Seno, T., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2009). The object and background hy-
pothesis for vection. Vision Research, 49, 2973-2982.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.017
Seno, T., Ito, H., Sunaga, S., & Nakamura, S. (2010). Temporonasal
motion projected on the nasal retina underlies expansion-contraction
asymmetry in vection. Vision Research, 50, 1131-1139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.020
Seno, T., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011a). Attentional load inhibits vec-
tion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1467-1476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0129-3
Seno, T., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011b). Self-motion perception com-
presses time experienced in return travel. Perception, 40, 497-499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p6885
Seno, T., Ito, H., Sunaga, S., Hasuo, E., Nakajima, Y., & Ogawa, M.
(2011). Consistency between modalities enhances visually induced
self-motion (vection). In G. Suzuki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th In-
ternational Multisensory Research Forum. Fukuoka: I-Perception.
Seno, T., Ogawa, M., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011). Consistent air flow
to the face facilitates vection. Perception, 40, 1237-1240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p7055
Seno, T., Taya, S., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011). Mental number line in
depth revealed by vection. Perception, 40, 1241-1244.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p6965
Seno, T., Yamada, Y., & Ihaya, K. (2011). Narcissistic people cannot
be moved easily by visual stimulation. Perception, 40 , 1390-1392.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p7062
Seno, T., & Fukuda, H. (2012). Stimulus meanings alter illusory self-
motion (vection): Experimental examination of the train illusion.
Seeing & Perceiving, 25, 631-645.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18784763-00002394
Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Cross-modal dy-
namic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across
sensory modalities. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 30, 330-345.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.330
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth
promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606-607.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548