M. W. NGWARE ET AL.
seating position on learning achievement gains. The study uses
gain score as the outcome variable to measure the amount of
learning that took place within an interval of 10 months, with
the same math test being administered twice. This rich data and
our analyses made it possible to generate scientific evidence
that we use to fill several existing gaps in the literature. For
example, extant literature on learning achievement in Kenya
has not used score gains as an outcome measure, and instead it
relies on test and national examination scores; there is no lit-
erature on Kenya that links seat position to learning gains.
The consideration of the student’s seat position relative to the
student’s academic ability in the Kenyan primary school class-
room deserves more attention. Our analysis shows that seating
in the front row has a positive and significant effect on learning
achievement. Our results corroborate what other studies outside
Kenya have found, though not using gain score.
The linkages between seating position and learner achieve-
ment have important implications for education policy and
classroom practices in Kenya. Teachers can change classroom
seating positions in a way that optimizes learning achievement
for every learner, since the seat position has the potential to
improve achievement gains. In particular, low performing
learners can improve their grades by seating at the front rows
especially in large class sizes. However, the teacher would have
to monitor the progress of those seated away from the front
rows, even if such students are high performers. That is, the
teachers should pay attention to the different seating rows for
the benefit of all students. Teacher preparation programs, both
in-service and pre-service, and teacher employers need to em-
phasize more on classroom environment. This paper shows how
our main explanatory variable predicts learning gains in schools
that are different academically. Although managing classroom
physical environments has the potential to address learning
differentials, different seating positions and arrangements
should be tested for their efficiency in instructional delivery
and effectiveness in improving learning outcomes among
learners with different academic ability.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the important contribution of the African
Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) staff who
participated at various stages of the development of this paper
including data collection and processing as well as giving valu-
able comments during the internal review process. We are also
grateful to our partners including the Ministry of Education for
providing us with introductory letters to the District Education
Officers and school head teachers. Funding for this study was
provided by Google.org through the Education Research Pro-
gram at APHRC. We are grateful to The William and Flora
Hewlett Foundation for their continued support. Finally, we are
grateful to the school principals, teachers, and learners who
participated in this study. The views presented in this paper are
only those of the authors and not necessarily shared by those
mentioned.
REFERENCES
Benedict, M. E., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures:
Are seating preferences or location related to course performance?
Journal of Economic Education, 35, 215-231.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.3.215-231
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A.,
et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activa-
tion in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational
Research Journal, 47, 371-406. http://aerj.aera.net
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Georges, A., Borman, K. M., & Lee, R. S. (2010). Mathematics reform
and teacher quality in elementary grades: Assessments, teacher li-
censure, and certification. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18,
1-36. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/757
Glewwe, P. (2002). Schools and skills in developing countries: Educa-
tion policies and socioeconomic outcomes. Journal of Economic Lit-
erature, 40, 436-482.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161258
Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional de-
velopment affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much
and for how long? Economics of Education Review, 29, 432-439.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002
Government of Kenya (2005). Education statistical booklet 1999-2004.
Nairobi: Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
Granstrom, K. (1996). Private communication between students in a
classroom in relation to different classroom features. Educational
Psychology, 16, 349-364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160401
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality
and student achievement. CALDER Working Paper No. 3.
http://www.caldercenter.org/PDF/1001059_Teacher_Training.pdf
Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005).
The impact of school environments: A literature review. Callaghan,
NSW: University of Newcastle.
http://www.cfbt.com/PDF/91085.pdf
Juhary, J. (2012). An assigned seating arrangement based on students’
performance: A critical review. Journal of Education and Practice, 3.
(Online)
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/3414/3441
Kalinowski, S., & Taper, M. L. (2007). The effect of seat location on
exam grades and student perceptions in an introductory biology class.
Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 54-57.
Kaya, N., & Burgess, B. (2007). Territoriality seat preferences in dif-
ferent types of classroom arrangements. Environment and Behaviour,
39, 859-879. http://eab.sagepub.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298798
Levine, D. W., O’Neal, E. C., Garwood, S. G., & McDonald, P. J.
(1980). Classroom ecology: The effects of seating position on grades
and participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6,
409-412. http://psp.sagepub.com/content/6/3/409.abstract
Marshall, J. H. (2009). School quality and learning gains in rural Gua-
temala. Economics of Education Review, 28, 207-216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.009
Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effect on the
practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139-
156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0239
Marx, A., Fuhrer, U., & Hartig, T. (2006). Effects of classroom seating
arrangements on children’s question-asking. Learning Environment
Research, 2, 249-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009901922191
McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamil-
ton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001067
Morrison, F. J., Bachman, H. J., & Connor, C. M. (2005). Improving
literacy in America: Guidelines from research. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Moore, D. W., & Glynn, T. (1984). Variations in question rate as a
function of position in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 4,
233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341840040304
Ngware, M. W., Oketch, M., & Ezeh, A. C. (2011). Quality of primary
education inputs in urban schools: Evidence from Nairobi. Education
and Urban Society, 43, 91-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124510379131
Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. (2005). The surprising impact of seat
location on student performance. The Physics Teacher, 43, 30-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1845987
Open Access 709