L. AUZOULT
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. 743
223-237.
Ashkanasy, N. M., & O’Connor, C. (1997). Value congruence in
leader-member exchange. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 647-
662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595486
Auzoult, L. (2012). How psychological distances from power develop
through power distance values. Psihologia Social a, 29, 7-15.
Auzoult, L., & Abdellaoui, S. (2011). The mediating role of reflexivity
and climate between power distance and efficiency of a working
team. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 17, 1-10.
Beaudin, G., & Savoie, A. (1995). L’efficacité des équipes de travail:
Définition, composantes et mesures. Revue Québécoise de Psy-
chologie, 16, 185-201.
Cabrera, A, Collins, W. C, & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of
individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International
Journal of Human Resources Management, 17, 245-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614
Campion, A. C., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations
between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication
and extension. Personnel Psycholo gy, 49, 429-452.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Human auton-
omy in cross-cultural context, perspectives on the psychology of
agency, freedom and well-being. London: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group
effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite.
Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in
a work organization. Journal of A pplied Psychology, 74, 580-590.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00219010.74.4.580
Dierdorff, E. C., Bell, S. T., & Belohlav, J. A. (2011). The power of
“we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance
over time. Journal of applied psychology, 96, 247-262.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020929
Earley, P. C. (1999). Playing follow the leader: Status-determining
traits in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 192-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2863
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance:
A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 2 2, 175-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222002
Festinger, L. (1950). Informational social communication. Psychologi-
cal Review, 57, 271-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0056932
Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology,
30, 409-425.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory as a new
framework for understanding organizational behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group
effectiveness. Admini s t r a t i o n Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392936
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences—Comparing values, be-
haviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Hsu, M. H., Chen, Y.-L., I., Chiu, C. M., & Ju, T. L. (2007). Exploring
the antecedents of team performance in collaborative learning of
computer software. Computers & Education, 48, 700-718.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.018
Jordan, M. H., Feild, H. S., & Armenakis, A. (2002). The relationship
of group process variables and team performance: A team-level
analysis in a field setting. Small Group Research, 33 , 121-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300104
Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Crevier-Braud, L. (2011). The
fundamental need to belong on the distinction between growth and
deficit-reduction orientations. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 37, 1185-1201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405995
Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L., (2006). Collective efficacy
beliefs in student work teams: relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and
performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 73-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.04.001
Lira, E. M., Ripoll, P., Peirό, J. M., & González, P. (2007). The roles of
group potency and information and communication technologies in
the relationship between task conflict and team effectiveness: A lon-
gitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2888-2903.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.004
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & De Church, L. A. (2009). Information shar-
ing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psy-
chology, 94, 535-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
Mulder, M. (1977). The daily power game. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6951-6
Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohe-
siveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin,
115, 210-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
Ng, S. H. (1980). The social psychology of power. London: Academic
Press.
Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influ-
ence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
Richer, S. F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1998). Construction and validation of
the need to belong scale. European Review of Applied Psychology,
48, 129-137.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Approaching and avoiding self-
determination: Comparing cybernetic and organismic paradigms of
motivation. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Perspectives on behavioral self-
regulation, Volume 12 (pp. 193-217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
baum Associates.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing trans-
formational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behav-
ior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020-
1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020
Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Vandenberghe, C., (2004). Value
congruence and commitment to the organization and to the work
group. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10, 165-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2004.04.008