Molecular Modeling of Cell Adhesion Peptides on Hydroxyapatite and TiO2 Surfaces: Implication in
Biomedical Implant Devices 355
can be adsorbed directly toinitiate the cell-adhesion pro-
cess during bone tissue regeneration process.
The water molecules occupy the adsorption sites on
the hydrophilic TiO2 surfaces, i.e. the water oxygen at-
oms bond to the surface titanium atoms to form the stable
first hydration layer and interact with the surface oxygen
atoms to form the second hydration layer. Besides being
in competition with RGD for the adsorption sites, the ad-
sorbed water layers also play an intermediary role, form-
ing HB interactions with the hydrophilic groups of RGD.
The guanido (NH2), amino (NH3) and carboxyl groups
(COO-) of tripeptide RGD are the main groups bonding
to TiO2 surface by electrostatic and VDW interactions.
The extent of hydration of different functional groups
on each peptide was also considered. Some of the func-
tional groups in the peptide are still hydrated after ad-
sorption and the others are bonded to the mineral surface.
The final adsorbate structure on the mineral surface eva-
luates which functional groups were bonded to the min-
eral surface, and hydration energies of these functional
groups were subtracted from the peptide vacuum adsorp-
tion energy to obtain the effective adsorption energies.
The NH2- with peptide bond elements are more strongly
hydrated than other functional groups (−1.465 eV hydra-
tion energy), followed by the amide functional group
(C(NH)=NH-NH2) of arginine (R) (−1.106 eV). The
COO- groups have hydration energies of ~−0.2 eV to
−0.5 eV. When the peptide is kept parallel or perpen-
dicular to the [010] direction (orientations 1 and 2), the
amide and carboxylic groups interact with the mineral
surface, allowing the peptide to maintain its “hairpin”
position.
The above hydration strategies were used in exactly
same way when adsorption of peptide is calculated only
on HA surface. Adsorption of peptides on TiO2 surface
followed similar course and the hydration energies for
responsible functional groups on TiO2 surface has been
deducted accordingly to calculate the effective adsorp-
tion energy of RGD, YIGSR on TiO2. The retention of
hairpin like structure of RGD on TiO2 surface is of great
importance in showing similarity of behaviour of RGD
on both HA and TiO2-surface in aqueous environment.
5. Conclusion
The adsorption energies of RGD and YIGSR on Hy-
droxyapatite surface and TiO2 surface reveal similar
trends. Comparing the adsorption energies for both the
surfaces, we can conclude that RGD behaves similarly on
both the surfaces, with positioning of the peptide near the
edge of the cluster (Orientation 4) yielding most favor-
able adsorption energy. This gives us a clear idea about
the peptide orientation during the tissue-engineering
process. When artificial inclusion of Titania-based nano-
particles is required inside the tissue, it is important to
know how the peptides are going to interact with TiO2
surface. The adsorption energies and favorable confor-
mations of peptides on TiO2 assist researches to design
biomedical implants making them appropriately keep in
mind that the most favorable surface for peptide adsorp-
tion on TiO2 is (1 1 0). Future studies will concentrate on
more TiO2 surfaces and more peptides to develop a more
general approach for designing of biomedical implants to
facilitate bone-tissue engineering.
6. Acknowledgements
This work has been partially funded by National Science
Foundation, USA, Tissue Engineering at University of
Michigan, NSF Grant of Prof. Udo Becker at University
of Michigan.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Woo, J. Seo, R. Y. Zhang and P. X. Ma, “Suppression
of Apoptosis by Enhanced Protein Adsorption on Poly-
mer,” Biomaterials, Vol. 28, No. 16, 2007, pp. 2622-
2630.
[2] S. P. Massia and J. A. Hubbell, “Covalent Surface Immo-
bilization of Arg-Gly-Asp-and Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg-Con-
taining Peptides to Obtain Well-Defined Cell-Adhesive
Substrates,” Analytical Biochemistry, Vol. 187, No. 2,
1990, pp. 292-301.
[3] Y. Iwamoto, F. A. Robey, J. Graf, M. Sasaki, H. K.
Kleinman, Y. Yamada and G. R. Martin, “YIGSR, a Syn-
thetic Lamininpentapeptide, Inhibits Experimental Me-
tastasis Formation,” Science, Vol. 238, No. 4830, 1987,
pp. 1132-1134.
[4] W. H. Kim, H. W. Schnaper, M. Nomizu, Y. Yamada and
H. K. Kleinman, “Apoptosis in Human Fibrosarcoma Cells
Is Induced by a Multimeric Synthetic Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-
Arg (YIGSR)-Containing Polypeptide from Laminin,” Can-
cer Research, Vol. 54, No. 18, 1994, pp. 5005-5010.
[5] E. Ruoslahti, “RGD and Other Recognition Sequences for
Integrins,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Bi-
ology, Vol. 12, 1996, pp. 697-715.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697
[6] M. Kantlehner, D. Finsinger, J. Meyer, P. Schaffner, A.
Jonczyk, B. Diefenbach, B. Nies and H. Kessler, “Selec-
tive RGD-Mediated Adhesion of Osteoblasts at Surfaces
of Implants,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition,
Vol. 38, No. 4, 1999, pp. 560-562.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990215)38:
4<560::AID-ANIE560>3.0.CO;2-F
[7] M. Gilbert, W. J. Shaw, J. R. Long, K. Nelson, G. P.
Drobny, C. M. Giachelli and P. S. Stayton, “Chimeric
Peptides of Statherin and Osteopontin That Bind Hydro-
xyapatite and Mediate Cell Adhesion,” Journal of Bio-
logical Chemistry, Vol. 275, No. 21, 2000, pp. 16213-
16218.
[8] U. Becker, S. Biswas, T. Kendall, P. Risthaus, C. V. Put-
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JBNB