Advances in Journalism and Communication
2013. Vol.1, No.3, 26-40
Published Online September 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajc) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2013.13004
A Study on Empathy, Credibility, and Political Attitude in Social
Media: Focused on the Relationship between Empathetic Intention
and the Motivation of Belonging on Intended Pro-Social and
Political Behavior
Seo-young Lee1, Sang Hee Kweon2*
1Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Mass Communication & Journalism, Sungkyunkwan
University, Seoul, Korea
Received April 16th, 2013; revised May 26th, 2013; accepted June 6th, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Seo-young Lee, Sang Hee Kweon. This is an open access article distributed under the Crea-
tive Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any me-
dium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This study explores the relationship how SNS through empathetic intentions and motives affect political
participation and foster positive attitudes. In addition, this research explores how online and offline inter-
action affects attitudes in political participation. The theoretical background of the research is based on
the theory of planned behavior, in which the behavior of individuals is determined by attitudes towards
behavior, and the subjective norms that influence intended behavior. Depending on how much time is
spent on personal online activities, you can predict offline behavior through online attitudes, which can
help to increase the explanatory power of the theory of planned behavior. In this study, there is a verifica-
tion of offline political action related to the attitudes formed through social media. Social network service
(hereafter SNS) could have important implication for modern society as a predictive tool. The research
was conducted on 291 members of an SNS community and based on the survey data gathered, a hierarchi-
cal regression analysis was applied. The analysis was found to significantly predict the behavioral tenden-
cy of the subjects to cooperate and share information online when there is an intent and motive towards
personal empathy. Online cognitive behavior control shows that the higher level of information sharing
and trust, the higher the offline intent to participate in political action. Finally, there is a high correlation
between online and offline political attitudes. The more positive the political attitudes, either online or
offline, the more intent to participate in offline political action.
Keywords: SNS; Trust; Empathy; Pro-Social Behavior; Political Participation
Introduction
The SNS (social network service) is a public space and at the
same time a private space for self-expression. Through SNS,
people have an increased opportunity to express themselves and
expose themselves to the public in which in turn deepens the
level of communication and self-disclosure, so that it promotes
honest and sincere interaction. This can be said to be empathy
(Stern, 2002).
Researchers define empathy in various different ways. They
also focus on very different aspect of empathy in their research
(Eisenberg & Fabes, 1990; Eisenberg & Miller, 1987; Wispé,
1986). The theoretical construct of empathy that has been used
in previous studies include diverse terms such as cognitive em-
pathy, emotional contagion, empathic accuracy, self-other over-
lap, and sympathy (Preston & Hofelich, 2011). In addition, ac-
cording to the theoretical construct of empathy that researcher
have adopted, the subject of studies also vary greatly, for ex-
ample, expressive stereotypical behavior of participants, emo-
tional response and helping behavior, empathy regarding accu-
rate inferences about the thoughts and feelings of subjects, mat-
ching degrees of self-concept and other-concept, etc. ( Batson,
Sager et al., 1997; Davis, Conklin, Smith, & Luce, 1996; Galin-
sky & Moskowitz, 2000; Simpson, Orina, & Ickes, 2003).
Even though the concepts construed and subject matters vary
among researchers, empathy can be divided into two broad
categories, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy. This is
based on the research focus which naturally falls between these
two aspects of empathy. Eisenberg and Miller (1987) who fo-
cused on the emotional aspect defined the empathy as “under-
standing the emotional states of others, and experiencing the
same emotional state”. Ickes (1993) who focused on the cogni-
tive aspect, defined empathy as “the ability to accurately infer
the content of the thoughts and feelings of others”. In addition,
Batson (1987) defined empathy as “one’s perception of others
welfare state and consistent others-oriented emotional reac-
tions.” Galinsky, Ku and Wang (2005) defined it as a “Process
of imagining the self and the world from an others-oriented
perspective”. Looking at these definitions, researchers typically
*Corresponding author.

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
approach empathy as either cognitive empathy or emotional
empathy.
On the other hand, there were some attempts made to com-
prehensively cover the topic that do not distinguish between
cognitive empathy and emotional empathy. Regan and Totten
(1975) claim that taking the perspective of others causes a
change in information processing which would impact on the
sentiment to share.
Davis (1983) conceptualized empathic interest as comprised
of four sub-factors; empathic concern, perspective taking, fan-
tasy, and personal distress. Recently, Hodges and his colleagues
(2010) conducted research on empathic concern and sought to
define the components of empathy and the accuracy thereof
simultaneously in a single experiment.
Therefore, we need to consider carefully social behavior that
appears differently depending on empathetic intention. These
are necessary considerations when trying to identify a pattern
concerning high empathy and pro-social behavior. Because
empathy reflects interpersonal situations between individuals
and others, SNS use can be seen to reflect that intention to em-
pathize with other people. This is apparent in the exchange of
information with others or in any situation in which community
participants talk and exchange opinions.
In this study we attempt to verify perception through asking
questions about the purpose of the SNS connections and the
characteristics of SNS discourse. Therefore, in this study, we
will measure empathetic intent towards others via SNS.
Theoretical Background
Theory of Planned Behavior
The purpose of this study is to measure the correlation be-
tween empathy experience and political expression from a point
of view of theory of planned behavior on the premise that SNS-
mediated experience of empathy has a positive impact on inter-
personal trust and social trust.
According to the theory of planned behavior (TPB), human
behavior is determined by the positive attitudes towards exe-
cuting certain behavior and by the evaluation of actions from
others who are important to the actor. That is, in the theory of
planned behavior, the explanation about an individual’s specific
behavior is modeled as the causality of an attitude toward in-
tended behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral
control that affects behavioral intent, and finally the behavior
intent that drives specific behavior (Ajzen, 1985). The specific
factors that comprise the theory of planned behavior are atti-
tudes that affect behavioral intent, subjective norms, perceived
behavioral control, and behavioral factors. Attitudes means the
assessment made on a specific act of individual and comprise of
the potential of action taken thereby appearing subjective, and
emotional recognition.
In addition, subjective norms are a kind of social pressure
created when somebody initiates specific behavior considering
how other people the actor considers important would assess
that behavior and if the actor can accept that reaction.
Perceived behavioral control means self-awareness of any
action he or she can performs and the extent to which those
actions are being carried out under one’s own control. Lastly
behavioral intent means the expression of willingness to do
one’s intended behavior (Ajzen, 1985).
Online communication effect or pattern is a condition that is
determined by a user’s prejudice and orientation on community
activities. This has emerged in cognitive psychology, as
O1-S-O2-R (Orientation1-Stimuli-Orientation2-Responses, Mar-
kus & Zajonc, 1985) model which says that according to social
background, structural characteristics, the recognition and syn-
chronization characteristics of individual, and the acceptance
state regarding personal messaging activities, choices are in-
duced. It is a very useful model to explain on-line news selec-
tion, sustainable consumption, community activities, and com-
ments activities.
O1-S-O2-R model added complex orientation (O1, O2) to tra-
ditional psychology model of stimulus-response (SR). Prior to
stimulus (S), the use of media or political inclination becomes
the first orientation (O1) of the acceptor. This includes demo-
graphic variables, dependency tendency of online users, etc.
The second orientation (O2) that appears after the use of Inter-
net act as a moderator and political communication through
online activities represent the message type, perceptions, and
attitudes etc. Finally, reaction (R) corresponds to the variables
for online political action.
As described in TPB, theoretically perceived behavioral con-
trols are based on self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1977). Ban-
dura (1977) described self-efficacy as self-confidence that indi-
viduals believe he or she can successfully perform the behavior
for specific results. When this is applied to the political behavi-
or, political self-efficacy can be seen as a person’s beliefs about
one’s ability to affect the political system. Likewise in previous
studies it is reported that people who feel higher political effi-
cacy believe that they can influence their political system or
political process and appreciate political participation and in-
tend actual participation more than those who do not (Kang,
2004). Considering these points, it can be anticipated that high-
er the political efficacy, the higher the intent to participate poli-
tically.
If we apply the theory of planned behavior (TPB) an indi-
vidual’s participation in politics; attitudes, subjective norms,
and political efficacy regarding political participation, influence
the intent to participate politically and again this will influence
actual political participation.
For example, when individual forms a positive attitude to-
ward political participation and when individuals received the
pressure for political participation from their surroundings, he
or she will participate in voting, discussion, or political cam-
paigns.
Thus, the political participation of individuals can be under-
stood as a planned action. Based on these points, in this study
we applied the theory of planned behavior to SNS and we’d
like to explore whether attitudes, subjective norms, and political
efficacy regarding political participation that is formulated
online will predict real-world offline intent to participate poli-
tically.
Empathetic Inten tion and Attit ud e t owards
Political Participation
Research that says empathy causes pro-social behavior is a
consensus that has accumulated in the field of social psycholo-
gy over a long period of time. In the study of Ku, Wang, and
Galinsky (2010), the perspective of the participants were ma-
nipulated to take the point of view of the elderly or to maintain
an objective perspective. After that participant’s conservative-
ness was measured by asking questions such as, the degree in
which they favor of homo-sexual marriage, the degree in which

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
they favor exposure to scenes of sexual activity in over-the-air
broadcast, etc., through a questionnaire. In addition, the parti-
cipants also read a scenario that contained a description that is
difficult to interpret and containing ambiguous behavior, then
they asked the participants to determine the degree to which the
scenario protagonist to relied on others. As a result, the partici-
pants with elderly perspective had higher conservative tendency
than the participants in the controlled environment maintaining
an objective perspective and had a higher tendency to judge that
the protagonist in the scenario is less dependent. In another re-
search, after manipulating participants’ perspective in the same
manner, the time required for participants to walk to elevator
from the research lab was measured after finishing the experi-
ment. As a result, participants with the elder’s perspective
walked more slowly than participants in the controlled envi-
ronment, taking more time to arrive at the elevator. These re-
sults suggest that if someone has cognitive empathy for others,
his or her behavior occurs in a manner consistent to stereotypes
of the empathetic object, however attitudes actually form in the
opposite direction to the stereotypes. Therefore, when one has
interaction with certain objects of his or her stereotype (for
example, black or elderly) behavioral control will happen in a
socially desirable way. In other words, cognitive empathy helps
pro-social expression.
In the study of Batson et al. (1997), participants were ran-
domly assigned to a group in which they imagine what the
character of a scenario would feel in the situation depicted in an
article (high-empathy), and a group in which they read the same
scenario in a highly objective way (low-empathy). After that,
the participants read the scenario presented in the form of an
interview with the head of household of the girl who lost her
parents in a car accident.
Analyzing the results, for the empathy emotions (26 adjec-
tives such as “pitiful”, “thought provoking”, “touching”, etc.)
that participants experienced while reading the scenario, and
the time that participants reported for how much they can vo-
lunteer to help the scenario protagonist, participants who read
the scenario while imagining how the protagonist would feel
reported strong empathetic emotions and applied more time to
spend in volunteer activities compared to participants who read
the scenario with an objective attitude. These results appear
consistently regardless of introducing the scenario protagonist
as a student at the same school with the participants or as a
student at a rival school to the participants. Therefore in this
study, we’d like to understand the impact of online and offline
attitudes towards political participation that appear through
sharing emotions with others from the perspective of emotional
empathy.
Table 1 Sympathy in relation to attitude and intention to-
wards political participation is located in the appendix.
Trust and SNS from the Perspective of Social Capital
Personal behavior is not just determined by personal charac-
teristics. Humans are basically social animals and are influ-
enced by our relationships with others, the social context and
various other factors that occur within that. Therefore, human
social resources can be seen to be the primary means for indi-
viduals to maintain a certain level of welfare and to achieve
goals. Putnam (1995) defined social capital as norms, trust, and
the network that facilitates coordination and cooperation for the
mutual benefit of the members of society.
Social capital refers to something that exists within human
relationships compared to physical capital and human capital
that enables production. But social capital does have something
in common with physical capital and human capital in having a
role to increase production. Social capital is very important
because it has the role of enabling social order by granting be-
havioral norms and common cultural identity shared among
members of society. The role of social capital then can be
summarized into following three factors. First, the role of in-
formation sharing, it enables formal and informal institutions to
provide accurate information. Second, the role of coordination
is to enable interaction between individual to restore trust
among members. Finally, the role of creating external effects is
through collective decision-making.
Trust is the most basic element that comprises social capital
and it is a subjective belief formed through a relationship be-
tween person and the target of trust (Fukuyama, 1999). On trust,
Giddens (1990) claimed that trust is a property like resources
that provides guidance to the behavior of individuals as well as
essential element to maintain and develop society. Such inter-
personal trust means a set of attitudes that people have toward
fellow citizens which can be instituted and accumulated
through a process of repetition and organization. When we con-
sider such factors, it seems obvious that social capital has a
great affect on society as a whole by improving the level of
trust between community members.
Therefore, we need to pay attention to the role of SNS as it
gives opportunities to expand social capital for individuals. The
reason for this is that social capital expanded through SNS al-
lows each individual to affect the outside world through collec-
tive decision-making. In this study, as a extension to the role
that SNS plays in expanding social capital, we will also explore
how SNS influences individual’s intention to engage in offline
political behavior, with an especial focus on the role of trust
that is formed within SNS communities.
Prior to discussing social capital we need to first understand
networks. Interconnection or networking is a basic premise of
forming human community. Networks often provide the me-
chanisms that lead to the realization of a group’s common in-
terests, such as political and economic development of the
group at a collective level (Brehm & Rahn, 1997). The reason
networks form the core of discussion in social capital related
discussions is because networks have become the basis for the
externalization of social capital. For example, interconnection
makes possible for individuals to take on essential roles in
community activities by facilitating the spread of information,
shared responsibility, trust within the group, and external direc-
tion.
Likewise, another reason understanding networks are impor-
tant in discussing social capital is because accrued social capital
generates certain behavioral outcomes. One of these outcomes,
as it has been reported in a study, is that as social capital in-
creases, the social and political participation of individuals also
increases (Putnam, 1995).
Especially after the introduction of Internet, the discussion of
social capital has been divided into theory of enhancement,
decline, and fusion of social capital. The theory of social capital
enhancement assumes that Internet has positive impact on off-
line by linking the people with common interest and forming
intimacy and trust between family, friends, and co-workers. In
other words, due to the technical characteristics of the Internet,
it has become easier to contact others and increases the indi-
28

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
vidual’s opportunities to form trust, solidarity, and interact co-
operatively (Seo & Park, 2003).
On the other hand, the theory of social capital decline as-
sumes that Internet has negative impact on the formation of
social capital. The Internet is said to cause social inequality and
the loss of opportunities for face-to-face contact due to an in-
formation gap. Therefore people met on the Internet are con-
sidered to be seeking private interests rather than producing
public goods and are therefore taking away from the opportuni-
ties of social participation, and the diversity and depth of the
feedback you need in order to cooperation and form trust with
each other. The theory explains that Internet rapidly personali-
zes recreational activities and blocks the formation of social
capital, reduces interest in social issues, and causes a collapse
of horizontal networks and hence there is a reduction in politi-
cal dialog, which in turn minimizes citizen participation.
In recent years, however, a theory of compliment or fusion
has been raised that emphasizes a new interpretation of the
theory of social capital enhancement and decline. Fusion theory
understands the Internet as interactive space of online-offline
and private-public interests. And the social capital formed here
is interpreted as a new form of social capital. This reflects the
new reality and the characteristics of social movement on In-
ternet. In other words, what is formulated online, the effect of
are expressed offline, and the fact that even though the Internet
is a place to pursue personal interests, it is also used as a tool
for public benefit (Skoric & Ng, 2009).
The discussion of fusion social capital in virtual space and in
the real world emphasizes that Internet fostered social capital
can evolve in a different way from traditional social capital. We
should consider that on the Internet social capital forms through
new kinds of social networks that are different from offline
communities, yet can still be configured into a productive rela-
tionship between the virtual and real world. Based on these
points, we suggest SNS is a system that can expand Internet
social capital and we expect this could play an important role in
the configuration of a productive relationship between virtual
reality and reality.
Table 2 Acceptance as a motivation information sharing and
trust is located in the appendix.
Research Questions and Resea rch Hypotheses
Empathetic Intent and the Attitudes towards
Political Participation
Studies on the effect of sharing emotions with others, emo-
tional empathy, or the about the perceived status of others ap-
pears to be based on emotional reactions (Eisenberg & Miller,
1987) as the act of helping has empathy for others as a prerequi-
site (eg, Batson, 1987; Batson, Klein, Highberger, & Shaw,
1995; Batson, O’Quin, Fultz, Vanderplas, & Isen, 1983; Baston,
Early, & Salvarani 1997 Coke et al., 1978; Toi & Batson, 1982).
Judging from these results, a high empathetic intention in
subjects indicates a high willingness to engage in pro-social
behavior such as information sharing, trust, inter-group coope-
ration. In this study, the following research questions and hy-
potheses were set up.
[Question 1] Does empathetic intention fostered on SNS
have a positive impact on people’s attitude towards political
participation?
(Hypotheses 1-1) With a higher empathetic intent the degree
of information shared will be higher.
(Hypotheses 1-2) With a higher empathetic intent, the degree
of inter-group cooperation will be greater.
The Motivation to Belong and Attitudes towards
Political Participation
The motive to belong is a fundamental human motivation.
Because humans are social animals, to belong to a group of
people, and to become accepted by others is a very powerful
motivation (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). The perception of
others when people meet and the extent to which we are ac-
cepted is a generally a psychological device used to gauge
self-esteem (Sociometer: Leary, 2000), and when people have
been accepted by others to this creates a state self-esteem which
is a positive experience (Leary, Tambor, Terdal, & Downs,
1995).
Thus we can confidently deduce that those that express a
strong motivation to belong will engage in more pro-social
behavior. As pro-social behavior by nature is socially desirable,
it is easier for individuals to win a positive evaluation by enga-
ging in behavior that is consider acceptable to the group. There-
fore, subjects motivated by group acceptance report more pro-
social behavior, namely information sharing, trust, and inter-
group cooperation. In this study, the following research ques-
tions were also addressed.
[Question 2] Does the motivation to belong fostered by
SNS create a positive attitude towards political participa-
tion?
(Hypotheses 2-1)When the motivation to belong is high, the
extent to which individuals share information will be greater.
(Hypothesis 2-2)When the motivation to belong is high, the
degree of confidence that individuals have in each other will be
greater.
(Hypotheses 2-3)When the motivation to belong is high the
consistency of political attitudes offline will also be high.
Attitudes towards Online and Offline Political
Participation
It is a fact that a person’s values have a significant impact on
political attitudes. This reflects a person’s actual attitude a
deeper level than the online or offline political attitude present-
ed to a group as motivated by impression management. This
means that if we examine online and offline political attitudes
they may not necessarily be consistent.
For example, if a person is mainly connected to an internet
community that is politically conservative that person’s per-
sonal attitudes may also seem conservative, but if the same
person is surrounded offline by politically progressive friends
he or she could also display a progressive attitude. In this case,
the political attitudes that a person shows rather than his or
her real attitude, but a temporarily formulated attitude to just
blend in well with others and to seem to be acceptable. In this
study, the following research questions and hypotheses are de-
rived.
[Question 3] Does online and offline political participa-
tion mutually influence attitudes?
(Hypotheses 3-1) Where there is a high cognitive behavioral
control displayed online, there will be a greater intent to engage
in offline political action.
(Hypotheses 3-2) There will be a high correlation between
online and offline political attitudes
(Hypothesis 3-3) Where there is a more positive attitude to-

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
wards online political action there will also be more intent to
engage in offline political action.
(Hypothesis 3-4) Where there is a more positive attitude to-
wards offline political action there will also be more intent to
engage in offline political action.
Major Factors
Table 3 Major factors is located in the appendix.
Research Methods
Research Meth od s and the Chara cteristics of the
Respondents
This study was conducted using a structured questionnaire
survey method. College students were selected as the target
population due to the convenience of sampling. Also using
standard sampling methods the researchers could easily obtain a
random sample. Therefore, because the rigid measures were
used, the sample in no way lacks representativeness.
However, this study has validity in statistical sampling re-
quirements, rather than the statistical precision but finding the
general trend is within expectations. In addition, college stu-
dents compared to other tiers stand out because of their access
to the latest media and high density of media use is a consider-
able factor in the selection of the sample.
In this study, hierarchical regression analysis was used. In
particular, in order to remove the bias on the tendency of the
individual respondents, the demographic characteristics of the
respondents were entered in Step 1, as demographic variables
(eg., gender, age, education, etc.), and in accordance with the
hypothesis empathetic intentions or motivations were entered in
step 2.
Survey Configuration
In this study, there were several factors extracted from social
media (blogs, Me2day, Twitter, Facebook, Online Communi-
ties, Cyworld). Each of those factors, niche width, niche over-
lap, and niche advantage where used to create a 7-point scale (1
= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = somewhat disagree 4 =
neutral 5 = somewhat agree, 6 = agree, 7 = strongly agree).
The questions used in this study follow those of other studies
of the media, Kim Gwan-gyu (2000, 2002), Kim Yu-Jeong
(2002), Na Eun-young (2001, 2002), No Ki-young and
Ki-Young Lee (2005), and Bae Jin-han (2001, 2003) relevant
factors were extracted from these studies and restructured for
use in this study. In other words, the information identified in
the study, for example, gender, relationships, convenience, en-
tertainment, personality, sociability factors are addressed by the
questions adopted.
Data Collection and Analysis
The survey for this study was given on 9th October 2011 and
was conducted over 11 days. When it was recalled a total of
291 college students responded to the structured self-adminis-
trated questionnaire and the information identified in previous
studies, performance, social relationships, and motivation-re-
lated factors were obtained
This study is a research identifying competition among ser-
vices to meet the users’ satisfaction. Services chosen were ac-
tively used domestic services and social network media such as:
blogs, Me2day, Twitter, Facebook, Online Community, Cy-
world services. In 2011 surveys were conducted on campus in
order to measure levels of satisfaction or the opportunity to
have a satisfactory experience through the use of SNS. The data
secured was analyzed through the Statistical Package of Social
Sciences, SPSS 19.
A look at the demographic characteristics of the respondents
showed that there were 164 male participants (56.0%) and 127
female participants (43.6%) with one non-response, and the
average age was 26 years old. In addition, the age range of 20
to 24 years old, 122 patients (41.9%) was the most common.
In this paper, we sought to verification the hypothesis
through hierarchical regression analysis. In particular, in order
to remove the bias of the responses caused by the demographic
characteristics of the individual and demographic variables in
step 1, the predictive variables for each hypothesis was set in
step 2. The hypotheses, and analysis conducted are presented as
follows.
Tables 4. Measurement variable, 5. Major factors of credi-
bility, 6. The characteristics of the respondents are located in
the appendix.
Hypothesis Testing
Sympathy with the Intent to Participate Politically
Empathetic intention will be stronger the greater the extent to
which information sharing occurs. Hypothesis 1, the results are
as follows:
Does empathetic intention fostered on SNS have a posi-
tive impact on people’s attitude towards political participa-
tion?
(Hypotheses 1-1) With a higher empathetic intent the degree
of information shared will be higher.
You will find that after controlling for the demographic
variables the prediction concerning empathetic intent and in-
formation sharing proved significant; the higher the empathetic
intent, the higher the degree of information sharing. The regres-
sion equation for Model 2 is as follows, and empathetic intent
according to the following regression equation to predict in-
formation sharing had a significance level of p < .001 which is
statistically significant.
1
.358YX



Table 7 Empathy in promoting information sharing, a hier-
archical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in the appen-
dix.
(Hypotheses 1-2) With a higher empathetic intent, the degree
of inter-group cooperation will be greater.
For hypotheses 1-2 empathetic intention will be stronger the
higher the degree of cooperation within the group, results are
summarized as follows.
Empathetic intent significantly predicts the level of coopera-
tion within a group, even after controlling for demographic
variables. In other words, a high degree of empathetic intention
indicates a stronger cooperation within groups. The regression
equation of Model 2 is as follows, and empathetic intent ac-
cording to the following regression equation can predict the
degree of cooperation within the group with a significance level
of p < .001 which is statistically significant.
1
.320YX



30

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table 8 Empathy in intergroup cooperation, a hierarchical
regression analysis (n = 291) is located in the appendix.
The Motivation to Belong and Attitudes towards Politic al
Participation
[Question 2] Does the motivation to belong fostered by
SNS create a positive attitude towards political participa-
tion?
(Hypotheses 2-1)When the motivation to belong is high, the
extent to which individuals share information will be greater.
Regarding the motivation to belong and information sharing
(Hypothesis 2-1). The results are as follows: Subject motivation
significantly predicted the degree of information sharing that
can be seen even after controlling for demographic variables. In
other words, the higher motivation to belong, the stronger the
intention to share information. Therefore, the regression equa-
tion of Model 2 is as follows, and following regression equation
predicts that the higher motivation to belong the greater the
information sharing, with a significance level of p < .001 which
in regression models is significant.
1
.247YX


Table 9 Acceptance as a motivation and the sharing of in-
formation, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is lo-
cated in the appendix.
(Hypothesis 2-2)When the motivation to belong is high, the
degree of confidence that individuals have in each other will be
greater.
The results and analysis of the hypothesis regarding a high
the motivation to belong, in relation to a strong degree of con-
fidence in others 2-2 is as follows. The motivation to belong
significantly predicted the degree of confidence, even after
controlling for all demographic variables.
Having a high motivation to belong indicates, a higher de-
gree of confidence in the other party. The regression equation
of Model 2 is as follows, and the motivation to belong, accord-
ing to the following regression equation predicts that the higher
the score, the higher the degree of confidence, with a signify-
cance level of p < .001 which in the regression models is sig-
nificant.
1
.293YX


Table 10 Acceptance as a motivation and confidence in oth-
ers, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in
the appendix.
(Hypotheses 2-3)When the motivation to belong is high the
consistency of political attitudes offline will also be high.
On higher motivation to belong and greater consistency of
offline political attitudes (hypotheses 2-3) the results are as
follow. The motivation to belong scores high after controlling
for the demographic variables as well as the consistency of
political attitudes as predicted.
However, in relation to the expression of offline political at-
titudes this was less consistent. This interpretation, however, is
due to the description of the model variance and is not signifi-
cant in the interpretation of the results. Therefore the regression
equation of Model 2 is as follows, and the motivation to belong,
according to the following regression equation predicts that the
higher the score, the higher the consistency of offline political
attitudes, with a significance level of p < .01 which in the re-
gression models is significant.
1
.176YX


Table 11 Motivation and offline political attitudes, a hierar-
chical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in the appendix.
Attitudes towards Online and Offline Political
Participation
[Question 3] Do online and offline political participation
mutually influence attitudes?
(Hypotheses 3-1) Where there is a high cognitive behavioral
control displayed online, there will be a greater intent to engage
in offline political action.
On high online cognitive behavioral control, and a high de-
gree of offline political action hypothesis 3-1 the higher the re-
sults are as follows:
Information-sharing scores significantly predict offline poli-
tical action intentions which can be seen even after controlling
demographic variables. Therefore, the higher level of informa-
tion sharing through SNS, the higher the flow of offline politi-
cal behavior. In addition, offline political trust scores signifi-
cantly predicted behavioral intentions which can be seen even
after controlling for demographic variables; in other words, the
higher the level of trust on SNS, the greater the intent to engage
in offline political action.
Therefore, under the assumption that information sharing and
trust correlate to intent to engage in offline action, the relation
to perceived behavioral control supports hypothesis 3-1.
Table 12 Offline political behavior and information sharing,
a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in the
appendix.
Table13 Trust and offline political action, a hierarchical re-
gression analysis (n = 291) is located in the appendix.
(Hypotheses 3-2) There will be a high correlation between
online and offline political attitudes
The results of the analysis on the correlation of political atti-
tudes in the online, offline (hypothesis 3-2) are as follows.
Online and offline score regarding political attitudes display a
static correlation that can be seen that significant. A consistent
tendency online political attitudes and offline political attitudes
has been observed.
Table 14 Online and offline political attitudes, correlation
analysis (n = 291) is located in the appendix.
Table 15 Online political attitudes and offline political atti-
tudes, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in
the appendix.
In addition, you can see that online political attitude scores to
predict offline political attitude scores after controlling demo-
graphic variables are accurate. Therefore, the more positive
attitudes are toward online politics, the more offline political
attitudes are positive. In the end, hypothesis 3-2 was supported.
(Hypothesis 3-3) Where there is a more positive attitude to-
wards online political action there will also be more intent to
engage in offline political action.
On the relationship between positive online attitudes toward
politics and greater offline political action (hypothesis 3-2) An
analysis of the results are summarized as follows.
Table 16 Online political attitudes and offline political be-
havior, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is located
in the appendix.
Online political attitude scores significantly predicted intend-
ed offline political action which can be seen after controlling
for demographic variables. Therefore, the more positive the
online political attitudes the greater the offline intention to en-
gage in political action is observed. Hypothesis 3-3 was sup-

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
ported.
(Hypothesis 3-4) Where there is a more positive attitude to-
wards offline political action there will also be more intent to
engage in offline political action.
On the relationship between more positive offline attitudes
toward politics and greater offline political action (hypothesis
3-4), an analysis of the results is as follows.
Table 17 Offline political attitudes and political behavior, a
hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291) is located in the ap-
pendix.
Offline political attitude scores significantly predict offline
political action which can be seen after controlling for demo-
graphic variables. Offline political attitudes had an effect on in-
tended offline political action. Therefore, hypothesis 3-4 was
supported.
Conclusion and Implications
The Findings
The impact of this study on political participation, trust and
information sharing through SNS fostered empathetic intention
and motivation, is comprehensively reviewed. The results can
be summarized as follows.
First, a high degree of empathic intention is required to share
information. Second, the higher the degree of cooperation with-
in a group, the stronger the empathetic intention is. Third, a
strong motivation to belong correlates to a high degree of in-
formation sharing. Fourth, the higher the degree of confidence
one has in others the higher the motivation to belong is. Finally,
a consistent political attitude correlates to a high motivation to
belong. The offline hypothesis was rejected.
As you can see, the strong findings from first to fourth indi-
cate that the connection between high empathic intent and
pro-social behavioral tendency was supported to some extent by
the motivation to belong to a much higher degree than higher
reasoning. This is just as in the offline world, therefore, SNS is
significantly predictive of pro-social behavioral tendencies as
they appear online as empathetic intention and motivation.
Sixth, the higher the online/offline cognitive behavioral con-
trol is, the higher the intention to act politically. Seventh, there
is a high correlation between online and offline political attitu-
des. Eighth, there is a close relationship between online/offline
political attitudes and intended political action. Ninth, the more
positive the online/offline political attitude is, the higher the in-
tention to act politically. It is clear that the political attitude that
can be formed through social media have a considerable impact
on behavioral intention, even offline.
Table 18 The impact of the dependent variable on step 2 and
3 (hierarchical regression analysis) is located in the appendix.
The Implications of the Study
The results of this study show that people act in accordance
to their plans in both cyberspace and real space, and this can be
explained. The implications of this present study can be sum-
marized as follows.
The empathetic intentions fostered by SNS tend to affect the
experience of empathy and confidence respectively. We know a
priori that the sympathetic experience of the subjects affect the
behavior in actual reality.
This together with the results of the research on experience
observed by Hunt (2007), enables us to look at the results of
this research on the relationship between empathy and SNS in
the same vein as Raymond, et al. (2009).
The correlation that exists between real political participation
and trust and empathy through SNS is consistent with the exist-
ing research results.
These results are particularly relevant as self-disclosure does
more than simply provide more information but it also appears
to have a positive influence on the experience of empathy, as
prior research on self exposure (Jourard, 1964 As Shapiro &
Swenson, 1977) discussed. Based on this understanding, to can-
didly confide one’s experience and feelings is a process of un-
derstanding the true self, and this seems to create more empathy
as a result.
In addition, it appears that by increasing the amount of in-
formation entrusted to others and as the sharing of experiences
increase so does the degree of sympathy fostered on SNS. Spe-
cifically, the elements of imagining another perspective, sym-
pathetic interest, social trust and interpersonal trust were each
influenced similarly. When we consider claims about the rela-
tionship between empathy and pro-social behavior (Hoffman,
1986; Batson, Ahmad, Lishner, & Tsang, 2002), and emotional
support and relationship formation (Weber, Johnson, & Corri-
gan, 2004), these results are consistent the research. We can see
that the experience of empathy has a positive impact on the
formation of positive relationships with others.
REFERENCES
Bae, J.-H. (2001). Meeting and recognizing the suitability of the mobile
phone as an interpersonal communication medium. Korea press Jour-
nal, 45, 160-188.
Bae, J.-H. (2003). The impact of face-to-face interpersonal communica-
tion media used in the new communications environment. Korea Press
Gazette, 23, 47-77.
Kang, N.-W. (2004). Study on the impact of the Internet and using
mass media to participate. Korea Press Gazette, 48, 116-143.
Kim, K.-G. (2000). Interpersonal impression formation in CMC in ex-
ploratory research. Cyber Communication Gazette, 5-29.
Kim, K.-G. (2002). A comparison of human relationships through com-
puter-mediated communication, relationships and real space. Korea Na-
tional Journal, 16, 73-109.
Kim, M.-J., & Choi, Y,-J. (2012). The impact of online and offline re-
lationships formed on smartphones via Twitter. Korea National Jour-
nal, 26, 43-82.
Kim, Y.-J. (2002). Attitudes of users according to media selection and
the use of media. Broadcasting Gazet t e , 16, 105-135.
Na, E.-Y. (2001). A study affecting the adoption of mobile phone, mo-
bile phone communications, and media properties. Korea Press Journal,
45, 189-228.
Na, E.-Y. (2002). Women’s new media use and its value. Korea Na-
tional Gazette, 16, 77-115.
No, K.-Y., & Lee, M.-Y. (2005). Study on competition in the medium
of the blog. Korea press Journal, 4 9, 318-345.
Park, S.-H. (2004). Empathetic schools yesterday and today. Hakjisa.
Seo, J.-W., & Park, H.-B. (2003). Internet use and social capital: the
possibilities of the cyber-community to form of social capital. Policy
Studies, 12, pp. 27-49.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavi-
or. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to
behavior (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavi-
oral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In
L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp.
65-122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Tsang, J. (2002). Four motives for com-
munity involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 429-445.
doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00269
Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking:
Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758.
doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995).
Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and jus-
tice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042-
1054. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1042
Batson, C. D., O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. (1983).
Self-reported distress and empathy and egoistic versus altruistic moti-
vation for helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,
706-718. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.706
Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang M., Rubchinsky, K., & Daw-
son, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 495-509.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire
for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psy-
chological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Brehm, J., & Rhan, W. M. (1997). Individual level evidence for the
causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Politi-
cal Science, 41, 999-1023. doi:10.2307/2111684
Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation
of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 36, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evi-
dence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 4 4 , 113-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of per-
spective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging
of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,
713-726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization,
measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emo-
tion, 14, 131-149. doi:10.1007/BF00991640
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to pro-
social and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 10 1, 91-119.
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the
ceconstruction of social order. New York: Free Press.
Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective taking and
self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coor-
dination. Group Process and Intergroup Re la tio ns , 8, 109-124.
doi:10.1177/1368430205051060
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: De-
creasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group
favorism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequence of modernity. Standford, CA:
Standford University Press.
Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B.
R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience
on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Per-
sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 398-409.
doi:10.1177/0146167209350326
Hoffman (1986).Effective teaching of reading: Research and practice.
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587-
610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x
Jourard, S. M (1964). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand.
Ku, G., Wang, C., & Gallinsky, A. (2010). Perception through a pers-
pective-taking lens. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46,
792-798. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.001
Leary, M. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer
theory. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Leary, M., Tambor, E., Terdal, S., & Downs, D. (1995). Self-esteem as
an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
Lipps, T. (1907). Das wissen von fremden ichen. Psychologischen
Untersuchungen, 1, 694-722.
Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social
psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of
social psychology (3rd Ed., pp. 137-230). New York: Random House.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, turning out: The strange disappearan-
ce of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 27, 64-
83.
Preston, S. D., & Hofelich, A. J. (2012). The many faces of empathy:
Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems
view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review, 4, 24-33.
Raymond, et al. (2009). Planet-planet scattering in planetesimal disks.
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 699, L88-L92.
doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L88
Regan, D., & Totten, J. (1975). Empathy and attribution: Turning ob-
servers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32,
850-856. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.850
Shapiro, A., & Swenson, C. H. (1977). Self-disclosure as a function of
self-concept and sex. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 144-149.
doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4102_4
Simpson, J. A., Orina, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts,
and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in martial
interactions. Journal of Personality and Soc ial Psy chol ogy, 85, 881-893.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881
Skoric, M. M., Ying, D., & Ng, Y. (2009). Bowling online, not alone:
Online social capital and political participation in Singapore. Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 411-423.
doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01447.x
Stern, S. (2002). Sexual selves on the world wide web: Adolescent
girls’ home pages as sites for sexual self-expression. In J. D. Brown, J.
R. Steele, & K. Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media: In-
vestigation media’s influence on adolescent sexuality (pp. 265-285).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a
source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 43, 281-292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.281
Weber, K., Johnson, A., & Corrigan, M. (2004). Communicating emo-
tional support and its relationship to feelings of being understood, trust,
and self-disclosure. Communication Rese a r c h Reports, 21, 316-323.
doi:10.1080/08824090409359994
Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To
call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and So-
cial Psychology, 50, 314-321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Appendix
Table 1.
Sympathy in relation to attitude and intention towards political participation.
Variables Questions
Access SNS to obtain knowledge and information.
Access SNS in order to share information.
Use SNS because of accessibility of information and the popularity of SNS.
Use of SNS due to interpersonal relationships with members.
Empathetic
Intention
Access SNS to reunite and meet new people and socialize.
I think positively about SNS and online political participation.
I think SNS and political participation by the online community is wise.
I use SNS and participate politically in the online community to resolve social conflicts such as
the economic disparity between rich and poor. This is valuable.
I use SNS and participate politically in the online community to safeguard the thinking of
society, as I consider this important.
Online
political
attitude
I want to use SNS and participate politically in online communities because I enjoy thinking
about such issues.
I think positively about offline political participation.
I think offline political participation is wise.
I participate offline in political issues such as solving the economic disparity between rich and
poor. I think this is valuable.
I practice offline political participation to safeguard the thinking of society as I consider this
important.
Political participation
and empathetic
attitudes towards help
Consistency of
political
attitude
Offline
political
attitude
I think it is advisable to participate in political activities offline.
Table 2.
Acceptance as a motivation, information sharing, and trust.
Variables Questions
We can know other people’s opinions and I think we can compare ourselves on SNS.
I use SNS because it is popular with the people I’m around.
I use SNS because of curiosity about other people.
Motivation of
belonging
I use SNS because I want to stay up to date with the latest social trends.
SNS and the online community provide the information that I need.
SNS and the members of the online community have an abundance of information.
I think that SNS and online communities act in a way that helps to solve problems.
Information
sharing
SNS and the online community provide the sufficient information to fulfill our purposes.
I trust people on SNS and the members of the online community.
The information provided by SNS and the online community is generally reliable.
I trust the SNS activities of my online community.
The participants and administrators of SNS and online communities are usually faithful.
Acceptance as a
motivation,
information
sharing, and trust
Confidence in
others
I have the confidence to talk openly on SNS and with the online community.
34

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table 3.
Major factors.
Variables Questions Preceding Research
Access SNS to obtain knowledge and information.
Access SNS in order to share information.
Use SNS because of accessibility of information and the popularity of SNS.
Use of SNS due to interpersonal relationships with members.
Empathy
Intent
Access SNS to reunite and meet new people and socialize.
Eisenberg & Miller (1987),
Ku, Wang & Galinsky (2010)
We can know other people’s opinions and I think we can compare ourselves on SNS.
I use SNS because it is popular with the people I'm around.
I use SNS because of curiosity about other people.
Acceptance as
motive
I use SNS because I want to stay up to date with the latest social trends.
Baumeister &
Leary (1995), Leary (2000)
SNS and the online community provide the information that I need.
SNS and the members of the online community have an abundance of information.
I think that SNS and online communities act in a way that helps to solve problems.
Information
Sharing
SNS and the online community provide the sufficient information to fulfill our purposes.
Leary (2000),
Leary, Tambor, Terdal &
Downs (1995)
I trust people on SNS and the members of the online community.
The information provided by SNS and the online community is generally reliable.
I trust the SNS activities of my online community.
The participants and administrators of SNS and online communities are usually faithful.
Confidence in
others
I have the confidence to talk openly on SNS and with the online community.
Leary, Tambor, Terdal &
Downs (1995)
I think positively about SNS and online political participation.
I think SNS and political participation by the online community is wise.
I use SNS and participate politically in the online community to resolve social
conflicts such as the economic disparity between rich and poor. This is valuable.
I use SNS and participate politically in the online community to safeguard the
thinking of society, as I consider this important.
Online
political
attitude
I want to use SNS and participate politically in online communities because I enjoy
thinking about such issues.
Kim Min-jung, Choi
Yoon-jung
(2012)
I think positively about offline political participation.
I think offline political participation is wise.
I participate offline in political issues such as solving the economic disparity between
rich and poor. I think this is valuable.
I practice offline political participation to safeguard the thinking of society as I
consider this important.
Consistency of
political attitude
Offline
political
attitude
I think it is advisable to participate in political activities offline.
Kim Min-jung, Choi
Yoon-jung
(2012)
Measurement is a 7-point scale (1 = does not do this at all/does not / not at all to 7 = very true/very often uses / Strongly Agree).

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table 4.
Measurement variable.
Step 1 Variables Step 2 Variables Dependent variables
Information sharing
Empathy intention
Collaboration within group
Information sharing
Trust for others
Acceptance motivation
Consistency of political attitude
Step 3 Variables Dependent variables
Cognitive-behavioral control
 Information sharing
 Trust
Online political attitudes
Gender
Years
Job
Education
Residence
Monthly income of household
Communication related expenses
Offline political attitudes
Offline political behavior
Table 5.
Major factors of credibility.
Variables Credibility
Empathy intention .90
Acceptance motivation .85
Information sharing .88
Trust for others .90
Online political attitudes .96
Consistency of political attitudes
Offline political attitudes .95
Table 6.
The characteristics of the respondents.
Categories # of people Ratio (%)
Male 128 44.0
Gender
Female 163 56.0
Under the age of 24 133 45.7
25 to 29 years of age 105 36.1
Age
30 years or older 53 18.2
Professional 73 25.1
Student 215 73.9
Job
Unemployed 3 1
Less than 5 million won 155 53.3
More than 5 million won 131 45
Monthly income of
household
No response 5 1.7
University student 122 41.9
Education
University diploma 169 58.1
Seoul 231 79.4
Residence
Outside of Seoul 60 20.6
Total 291 100.0
36

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table 7.
Empathy in promoting information sharing, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Model  R2 F R2 change F change
Set1 Gender .088
Age .004
Job .174**
Education −.101
Residence −.027
Household monthly income .000
Communication related expenses .113† .049 2.09*
Set2 Empathy intention .358*** .176 7.513*** .127 43.32
Dependent variable: information sharing; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Table 8.
Empathy in intergroup cooperation, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Model  R2 F R2 change F change
Set1 Gender .135*
Age .190*
Job .250***
Education −.027
Residence −.055
Household monthly income .028
Communication related expenses .012 .057 2.47**
Set2 Empathy intention .320*** .159 6.65*** .101 33.89
Dependent variable: cooperation within the group; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Table 9.
Acceptance as a motivation and the sharing of information, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Model  R2 F R2 change F change
Set1 Gender .088
Age .004
Job .174**
Education −.101
Residence −.027
Household monthly income .000
Communication related expenses .113† .049 2.086*
Set2 Acceptance motivation .247*** .109 4.30*** .060 18.88
Dependent variable: information sharing; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table 10.
Acceptance as a motivation and confidence in others, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Model  R2 F R2 change F change
Set1 Gender .145*
Age .131
Job .264***
Education −.035
Residence −.058
Household monthly income −.032
Communication related expenses .108† .071 3.107**
Set2 Acceptance motivation .293*** .155 6.487*** .084 28.061
Dependent variable: confidence in others; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Table 11.
Motivation and offline political attitudes, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Model  R2 F R2 change F change
Set1 Gender −.038
Age −.100
Job .002
Education .036
Residence −.029
Household monthly income −.024
Communication related expenses .084 .015 .603
Set2 Acceptance motivation −.176** .045 1.663 .030 8.96
Dependent variables: offline political attitudes; *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Table 12.
Offline political behavior and information sharing, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Non-standardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
Model
B Standard error Beta
t Significant
probability
1 (Constant) 2.457 .851 2.886 .004
Gender −.117 .126 −.064 −.930 .353
Age .036 .019 .149 1.902 .058
Job .067 .046 .098 1.450 .148
Education −.026 .087 −.020 −.294 .769
Residence −.010 .027 −.021 −.357 .721
Household monthly income −.001 .008 −.010 −.178 .859
Communication related
expenses .006 .015 .022 .374 .709
2 Information Sharing .226 .077 .174 2.924 .004
Dependent variable: offline political behavior.
38

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
Table13.
Trust and offline political action, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Non-standardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
Model
B Standard error Beta
t Significant probability
1 (Constant) 2.457 .851 2.886 .004
Gender −.117 .126 −.064 −.930 .353
Age () .036 .019 .149 1.902 .058
Job .067 .046 .098 1.450 .148
Education −.026 .087 −.020 −.294 .769
Residence −.010 .027 −.021 −.357 .721
Household monthly income −.001 .008 −.010 −.178 .859
Communication related expenses .006 .015 .022 .374 .709
2 Reliance .236 .082 .174 2.869 .004
Dependent variable: Offline political behavior.
Table 14.
Online and offline political attitudes, correlation analysis (n = 291).
Online political attitudes Offline political attitudes
Online political attitudes 1 .523**
Offline political attitudes .523** 1
**p < .01.
Table 15.
Online political attitudes and offline political attitudes, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Non-standardized coefficientsStandardized coefficients
Model
B Standard errorBeta
t Significant probability
1 (Constant) 3.391 .777 4.366 .000
Gender .029 .115 .017 .252 .801
Age () .031 .017 .139 1.776 .077
Job .081 .042 .132 1.935 .054
Education −.040 .080 −.034 −.507 .612
Residence −.004 .025 −.009 −.152 .879
Household monthly income −.005 .007 −.041 −.688 .492
Communication related expenses .007 .013 .032 .532 .595
2 Online political attitudes .467 .046 .522 10.178 .000
Dependent variable: Offline political behavior and attitude.
Table 16.
Online political attitudes and offline political behavior, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Non-standardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
Model
B Standard errorBeta
t Significant probability
1 (Constant) 2.457 .851 2.886 .004
Gender −.117 .126 −.064 −.930 .353
Age () .036 .019 .149 1.902 .058
Job .067 .046 .098 1.450 .148
Education −.026 .087 −.020 −.294 .769
Residence −.010 .027 −.021 −.357 .721
Household monthly income −.001 .008 −.010 −.178 .859
Communication related expenses .006 .015 .022 .374 .709
2 Online political attitudes .504 .051 .511 9.978 .000
Dependent variable: Offline political behavior.

S.-Y. LEE, S. H. KWEON
40
Table 17.
Offline political attitudes and political behavior, a hierarchical regression analysis (n = 291).
Non-standardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
Model
B Standard errorBeta
t Significant probability
1 (Constant) 2.457 .851 2.886 .004
Gender −.117 .126 −.064 −.930 .353
Age () .036 .019 .149 1.902 .058
Job .067 .046 .098 1.450 .148
Education −.026 .087 −.020 −.294 .769
Residence −.010 .027 −.021 −.357 .721
Household monthly income −.001 .008 −.010 −.178 .859
Communication related expenses .006 .015 .022 .374 .709
2 Offline political attitudes .676 .052 .613 13.115 .000
Dependent variable: Offline political behavior.
Table 18.
The impact of the dependent variable on step 2 and 3 (hierarchical regression analysis).
Information sharing Intergroup collaboration
Empathy .358*** .320***
Information sharing Trust for others Online/offline political attitudes
Step 2
Va ri ab les
Acceptance
motivation .247*** .293*** −.176**
Attitude to offline political behavior Offline political behavior
Information sharing .226**
Trust .236**
Online political
attitudes .467*** .504***
Step 3
variables
Offline political
attitudes .676***
Dependent variables: information sharing, intergroup co-operation, trust for others, online/offline political attitudes, attitudes to offline political action, offline political
behavior. Note: The values given are the regression coefficients (). *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.