M. S. ISLAM, J. SZPUNAR
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. OJNeph
167
clusion
of Urea at different blood flow rate is
REFERENCES
[1] R. M. Hakim,rd, R. A. Wolfe, F
8. Con
The clearance rate
in good agreement with the data provided by the Polyflux
210H manufacturer which ensures that the equations
used to represent the phenomenon of dialysis process are
reasonable. The clearance rate of small molecules—Urea
and Glucose, increases rapidly with increasing blood
flow rate while the clearance rate of Albumin is almost
constant. Also increasing dialysate flow rate ensures fur-
ther clearance of Urea and Glucose. Increasing the length
or radius of the dialyzer fiber ensures better clearance of
Glucose and middle molecules, such as Endothelin and
β2-Microglobulin. Moreover, increasing the length of the
dialyzer fiber shows better clearance than increasing the
radius of the dialyzer fiber, in the case of same amount of
Albumin loss.
P. J. Held, D. C. Stanna.
K. Port, J. T. Daugirdas and L. Agodoa, “Effect of the Di-
alysis Membrane on Mortality of Chronic Hemodialysis
Patients,” Kidney International, Vol. 50, 1996, pp. 566-
570. doi:10.1038/ki.1996.350
[2] M. Hayama, F. Kohori and K. Sakai, “AFM Observation
of Small Surface Pores of Hollow-Fiber Dialysis Mem-
brane Using Highly Sharpened Probe,” Journal of Mem-
brane Science, Vol. 197, No. 1-2, 2002, pp. 243-249.
doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00627-5
[3] S. R. Borzou, M. Gholyaf, M. Zandiha, R. Amini, M
Increases
489_5%20Pol
mate Modelling,” Sprin-
. T.
Goodarzi and B. Torkaman, “The Effect of Increasing
Blood Flow Rate on Dialysis Adequacy in Hemodialysis
Patients,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Trans-
plantation, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2009, pp. 639-642.
[4] A. T. Azar, “Increasing Dialysate Flow Rate
Dialyzer Urea Clearance and Dialysis Efficiency: An in
Vivo Study,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Trans-
plantation, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1023-1029.
[5] Gambro, “PolyfluxTM H–Gambro,” 2013.
www.gambro.com/PageFiles/7431/HCEN2
yflux_H.pdf?epslanguage=en
[6] T. Stocker, “Introduction to Cli
ger, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, p. 57.
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00773-6
[7] B. N. Preston, W. D. Comper, A. E. Hughes, I. Snook and
W. V. Megen, “Diffusion of Dextran at Intermediate Con-
centrations,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday
Transactions 1, Vol. 78, 1982, pp. 1209-1221.
doi:10.1039/f19827801209
[8] R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart and E. N. Lightfoot, “Transport
amoto, M. Hayama, M. Matsuda, T. Yahushiji, M.
Phenomena,” John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 1960. pp.
42-46.
[9] K. Yam
Fukuda, T. Miyasaka and K. Sakai, “Evaluation of Asym-
metrical Structure Dialysis Membrane by Tortuous Cap-
illary Pore Diffusion Model,” Journal of Membrane Sci-
ence, Vol. 287, 2007, pp. 88-93.
doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.018
[10] R. Ouseph, C. A. Hutchison and R. A. Ward, “Differences
in Solute Removal by Two High-Flux Membranes of
Nominally Similar Synthetic Polymers,” Nephrology Di-
alysis Transplantation, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1704-
1712. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm916
[11] A. Hedayat, J. Szpunar, N. A. P. Kiran Kumar, R. Peace,
H. Elmoselhi and A. Shoker, “Morphological Characteri-
zation of the Polyflux 210H Hemodialysis Filter Pores,”
International Journal of Nephrology, 2012.
doi:10.1155/2012/304135