
P. SUN ET AL.
93
2.8. Urine Samples
Rats fed 4 ml sterile water at each day at 9:00 am, and
then placed in metabolic cages, using the cylinder col-
lected 2 ml of urine. Urine samples were centrifuged, 20
min with 10000 rpm, and the supernatant was taken for
further analysis. Following metabolic analysis, rats were
tested in the open field.
2.9. Open-field Experiment Method
The open-field box was by 100 cm 100 cm 50 cm. The
paries and undersurfaces were black. The undersurface
was partitioned into 25 areas with same size by white
lines which were called periphery grilles porch. The wall
and the rest were called central grilles. The rat’s tail was
gripped at 1/3 of the root by the runner, and was put into
the mesh grille. The rat’s behavior changes were record
by photographic recording system for three minutes. (1)
Crossing score: the score is the number of times that
animals cross undersurface grilles. Four claws must all
enter the grille. (2) Rearing score: the score is the num-
ber of times that animals make a perpendicular act. Four
claws must leave empty or hold on to the wall. The
open-field experiment score is the total of the crossing
score and the rearing score. Simultaneously record the
modified time, modified number of times, the number of
times staying on the mesh grille, and dejecta number.
Each rat was used once after being made into the model,
3 min every time. The differences among groups were
compared. The photographic recordings were observed
by three staffs, and the concordance was confirmed
(Kappa exceeded 0.95) [8].
2.10. Analysis Conditions
Chromatographic conditions: Flow 0.4 ml/min, Sample
room temperature: 4, Column temperature: 60℃℃.
MS conditions:
Electrospray ion source, Positive ion mode V, 50-
1000 Da, scan time: 0.1s, inter time: 0.02 s, Lock mass:
0.01 ml/min LE ([M + H] + = 556.2771) (200 pg/ml),
Capillary voltage: 3 kv, Cone voltages: 60v, Ion source
temperature: 100℃, Desolvation temperature: 300℃,
Desolvation nitrogen flow: 700 L/hr, Cone gas flow: 50
L/hr.
2.11. Data Processing
Behavior of experimental data analysis using SPSS 13.0
statistical software, Multiple samples of the comparative
analysis of variance with one factor, UPLC-TOF-MS
spectra data use the Micromass MarkerLynx software
to identify peak and to peak matching, and use principal
component analysis to carry out pattern recognition to
the control group, model group and administration group.
3. Experimental Results
3.1. Comparison of Open-field Experiment Scores
In open-field experiments, compared with the normal
control group, the crossing scores, rearing scores and
open-field experiment total scores of rats in the inva-
sion model group remarkably increased (P < 0.05). The
tendency was retrieved remarkably after medication (P
< 0.05).
3.2. The Spectra Results of the urine Metabolic
Products
There was a remarkable difference between control
group and model group, but the contrasts were subtle
between control group and adminstration group from
Figure 1 showed as below.
3.3. Results of Principal Component Analysis
The scores chart of the urine metabolic product content
through principal component analysis showed as below
(Figure 2). There was so close position that we can
hardly differentiate the box marks (represent the con-
trol group) from the triangle marks (represent the ad-
ministration group), on the contrary, the diamond
marks (represent the model group) distributed far away
from other marks.
The box marks represent the control group, the dia-
mond marks represent the model group and the triangle
marks represent the administration group.
3.4. Analysis of Differences in Metabolic
Products
14 potential biological markers had been detected
through comparing the metabolic fingerprint difference
between model group and control group.
4. Discussion
Quantization evaluation of macroscopic appearance of
animal samples is very valuable to evaluate liver-related
metabolic aspects of the syndrome. Qualitative method
and half quantization bound with four-grade score
method were adopted to evaluate sample’s behaviors and
expressions in early works. The specific method was to
use four-grade score method (“+”expresses masc. result.)
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. CM